21.11.2014 Views

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Clockwork Orange<br />

71<br />

commentary on the fact that this procedure was taking something that<br />

was organic and full of life and color and making it clockwork, making<br />

it mechanical. Alex is the clockwork orange—or they attempt to make<br />

him such. Does that fit?<br />

Dahl: Sure. I guess what I thought was clever about it was that I recognized<br />

that one politician was trying to manipulate the situation to make himself<br />

look good and solve a criminal problem. <strong>The</strong>n the writer in the movie was<br />

in opposition to whatever that party represented.<br />

Does Alex win at the end? I don’t know how Anthony Burgess felt about<br />

it, but I feel like a terrible compromise has been made. This man’s going to<br />

go out and commit more crimes, and I’m in no way gleeful about it. <strong>That</strong>’s<br />

a very powerful juxtaposition with the use of an incredibly happy song, you<br />

know, “Singin’ in the Rain.” You have this incredibly chipper, bright song<br />

leading you to this dark, terrible moment. <strong>The</strong>re’s the music, and the press<br />

is there, and he goes back into his zone. In that very last image, he’s in snow<br />

with these Victorians surrounding him. And then you’re out. I don’t know<br />

what Anthony Burgess’s politics are, or what he was so greatly offended<br />

about. If the idea was that there are no quick fixes to the ills of the world,<br />

yes, his book is always going to be more pure in his mind. To bring that idea<br />

to the cinema and have millions and millions of people see it and continue<br />

to watch it . . . I can understand where he’s coming from. I think the movie<br />

accomplished what he was hoping to accomplish.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only thing that I thought was a wrong turn was the murder scene<br />

because, in the book, he’s much younger. But how are you going to get<br />

a child to do that level of acting? <strong>That</strong>’s a necessary fix. In the book, the<br />

woman whom he murders is, in fact, an elderly woman, and he smashes<br />

her head in with a statue of Ludwig van Beethoven. I thought they lost<br />

a lot of symbolism there. <strong>The</strong> instrument of his destruction is what he<br />

loves most, but he has to give that up—he’s repulsed by Beethoven after<br />

his “treatment.” Instead, what is his murder weapon? A giant ceramic<br />

penis. His libido.<br />

Dahl: I would argue that it’s his libido and his lust that gets him into<br />

trouble. It’s ironic that it’s Beethoven that ultimately gets him caught in<br />

the book.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!