21.11.2014 Views

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Clockwork Orange<br />

67<br />

somebody in a chair and weld their eyes open, and then all of a sudden they<br />

would be a model citizen.<br />

<strong>That</strong>’s a pretty powerful concept for a movie. I think it still is. <strong>The</strong>re’s the<br />

quaint ’70s style of it all, but I think it’s a powerful movie about rehabilitating<br />

criminals. Can you? And if you could, would you?<br />

<strong>The</strong>re’s also this friction between the quick-fix totalitarian state and the<br />

desire for order, which is what Burgess was reacting against. He was<br />

living among the mods in London. <strong>The</strong>re was a bunch of fiery rhetoric<br />

around the violence. Was it responsible to release this? Kubrick himself<br />

pulled the movie from distribution in London, fearful of copycat<br />

crimes and whatnot. Is there any kind of violence in films that you<br />

might regard as socially dangerous?<br />

Dahl: Well, my point of view about it is this: I hardly ever blame the artist<br />

for making the artwork or the desire to make the film. I have a bigger issue<br />

with the companies that put it out there to make a profit. I think they have<br />

to take more responsibility for the public’s reaction to artwork, because<br />

they’re the filter. An artist is going to do what an artist is going to do.<br />

Before, a painter made a painting and stuck it into a gallery, or somebody<br />

wrote a book. Now, when you’re talking about mass media as a conduit to<br />

millions of people, I think the people running the companies have to be<br />

the final filter on what people see and what they don’t see.<br />

<strong>That</strong> is what this film is addressing: Do you want heads of corporations<br />

or politicians deciding what we see or don’t see?<br />

Dahl: Well they do anyway, don’t they? Of course they do. Whatever the<br />

company, corporation, or government—they are final arbitrator of what people<br />

see. I suppose you can point to the artist and say, “Why did you make<br />

that?” But I think with artists, I don’t even know if they really know what<br />

they’re making sometimes. Ultimately, I think the responsibility to society is<br />

from the companies that pay for the film, put it out there, and profit from it.<br />

You’re echoing something that Kubrick said about artists and what the<br />

different causes of violence are. He says, “To try to fasten any responsibility<br />

on art as the cause of life seems to me to put the case the wrong

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!