21.11.2014 Views

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L’âge d’or<br />

141<br />

entomology books because I’d heard that Buñuel loved them. So not just<br />

Jean Henri Fabre but Maurice Maeterlinck’s descriptions of insect behavior,<br />

which are every bit as surreal in the depiction of the way insects love<br />

and behave. It’s like parallel universes to human behavior, and they’re<br />

really cool.<br />

But other than that, I don’t know. Most of those sections have to be deliciously<br />

endured the way you have to wait through Christmas Eve to get to the<br />

presents in the morning. Especially that bandit sequence, which was pretty<br />

dull. When you finally get to Gaston and Lya, then things are great. So I always<br />

try to make myself watch the movie from start to finish, but many times I’ve<br />

cheated and just watched the Gaston and Lya sections.<br />

One of the most controversial scenes is in the sixth section of the film:<br />

Christ comes out after murdering somebody whom he’s presumably<br />

raped, and then there are scalps on the cross. What did you make of<br />

that, if anything, when you first saw it?<br />

Maddin: I’d always been pretty secular, and I kind of bought it. It always<br />

seemed like fair game to kind of scalp the church somehow. It just seemed<br />

kind of quaint that the savagery of Buñuel’s attack always seemed kind of<br />

charmingly distanced for me because I’d already made quite a happy secular<br />

space for myself—that it felt a bit like looking at a picture book of World<br />

War I, or something. <strong>The</strong>re was so much time and space between me and<br />

it that I just saw it as something that must have been pretty important to<br />

the artist.<br />

It gave me a thrill, because clearly he was saving this up to the end and it<br />

really seemed to matter. It just seemed like a Winnipegger sitting pretty far<br />

upwind from the Bible Belt. <strong>That</strong> curious form of rebellion was like looking<br />

at something under glass, so it didn’t lash me into excitement in any way.<br />

For 1930, it was much more controversial. According to some scholars,<br />

it’s his invocation of Marquis de Sade’s 120 Days of Sodom.<br />

Maddin: Well, I’m sure, you know, you couldn’t see that type of scene in<br />

any American studio film then or now without controversy. It would still<br />

be pretty controversial for some people, but for some reason it is the movie<br />

that changed my life the most—made me make movies. It was his approach

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!