21.11.2014 Views

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Harlan County U.S.A.<br />

119<br />

every person who’s in the movie, but the key people that you’ve spent all<br />

this time with—those folks have trusted you enough to let you in. We feel<br />

like you need to let them see it with the understanding that they don’t have<br />

editorial control, but that you’re willing to listen. You’re showing it to them<br />

because you really want to understand how they feel about it—what they<br />

think of it. Do they think it’s accurate? If they don’t, then tell us why.<br />

For me, that has most always been a good experience, even though<br />

sometimes it’s a difficult experience. I’ve not always had universal happiness<br />

with what they saw, and so it leads to a discussion. Oftentimes, though,<br />

it has made the film better because they may feel like I’ve got something<br />

wrong, and I will interview them. Usually, if the situation allows it, I will<br />

have a camera when I go to meet them so there’s an opportunity for them to<br />

talk about something. If they say, “You really got that wrong,” it’s like, “OK,<br />

then tell me the way you think it is.” Usually it has made the film better. One<br />

of the things I tell subjects going into these long-term projects is that they<br />

will have that opportunity, and I do think that makes a difference for them.<br />

I don’t say they’ll have editorial control. I’m very clear about that, but I tell<br />

them that they’ll get a chance to look at it, to comment on it, and tell us<br />

what they think. We will take what they say very seriously. I think it makes<br />

a difference because it gives people more of a feeling that they can trust you<br />

in opening up.<br />

It’s interesting that you were talking about Barbara being able to talk<br />

people into an interview. I’ve talked to Fred Wiseman, and he refuses<br />

to do that. He’s said, “I don’t have time to talk anybody into anything.”<br />

It’s like: “This is what we’re doing. Participate or not.”<br />

James: He makes different kinds of films because he doesn’t really interview<br />

people. He goes in primarily and shoots for a discrete amount of time—a<br />

lot, but over a very discrete amount of time, for a couple of months, a few<br />

months. And that’s different than trying to build a relationship with a subject<br />

over a period of many months and even years. It’s a different animal. This is<br />

not to say one is better than the other, but I can understand why he can take<br />

that position. If you’re trying to make a film about somebody, where you’re<br />

going to spend many, many months and even years with them, then you’re<br />

going to build an actual relationship with that person. If it doesn’t have some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!