21.11.2014 Views

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

The_Film_That_Changed_My_Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Exterminating Angel<br />

99<br />

And I think—without getting too pointy-headed and analytical about<br />

Buñuel, who sometimes just throws in this stuff for fun—there’s a kind of<br />

repetitious mindlessness. Repetitiousness in the rituals of the bourgeoisie<br />

that underlines this kind of repetition, where they keep going through these<br />

rituals over and over and over again, in a slavish way. And it has that impact.<br />

Also, in the midst of a film, with no particular warning, it really knocks you<br />

for a loop.<br />

One of the interviewers in the booklet that comes with the Criterion<br />

DVD points out that this film seems to be a better-dressed version of<br />

<strong>The</strong> Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. What do you think of that?<br />

Gibney: Well, I think there are certain themes that come up with Buñuel over<br />

and over again. In <strong>The</strong> Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie he had evolved a little<br />

bit more. He takes this theme and works it out a little bit more playfully.<br />

But I do think they’re very similar. <strong>The</strong>y all revolve around eating. He did<br />

another film that I didn’t think was quite so successful in which he kind of set<br />

that ritual: People excuse themselves to go to the eating room, and meanwhile<br />

the dining table is actually the defecating table, where everybody’s shitting<br />

together. And then he has them excuse themselves to go and actually grab<br />

something to eat in what looks like a bathroom but has become the eating<br />

room, as a way of showing how arbitrary these rituals are.<br />

<strong>That</strong> wasn’t so successful for me, but <strong>The</strong> Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie,<br />

which I think is a brilliant film, does take off on the same idea<br />

of <strong>The</strong> Exterminating Angel—these rituals that never really seem to lead<br />

anywhere. In the case of <strong>The</strong> Exterminating Angel, it’s a roach motel. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

can check in but they can’t check out. In <strong>The</strong> Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie,<br />

they never get to eat. <strong>The</strong>y always show up for these dinners, or<br />

even tea, and the restaurant is mysteriously closed. So they always try to<br />

eat and they never get to. It’s always interrupted. In Exterminating Angel,<br />

they can’t leave. It’s similar.<br />

Buñuel had a very particular way of dealing with his actors. <strong>The</strong>re’s a<br />

famous story about how he smeared them with bits of honey and dirt<br />

to make them uncomfortable. I’m wondering what, as a filmmaker,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!