20.11.2014 Views

Download WCEA/WASC PDF - Bishop O'Dowd High School

Download WCEA/WASC PDF - Bishop O'Dowd High School

Download WCEA/WASC PDF - Bishop O'Dowd High School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

<strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Focus on Learning<br />

Submitted to<br />

The Western Catholic Education Association<br />

and<br />

The Western Association of <strong>School</strong>s and Colleges<br />

in conjunction with<br />

The <strong>School</strong> Department<br />

Diocese of Oakland, California<br />

November 2007


Table of Contents<br />

General Information ...................................................................................4<br />

Preface ...................................................................................................4<br />

Focus on Learning Process....................................................................4<br />

Timeline..................................................................................................6<br />

Committee Assignments.........................................................................8<br />

Strategic Planning Committees ............................................................10<br />

Student and Community Profile................................................................12<br />

History ..................................................................................................12<br />

Demographics and <strong>School</strong> Site ............................................................12<br />

Student Profile......................................................................................14<br />

<strong>School</strong> Administration...........................................................................17<br />

Teacher Profile .....................................................................................18<br />

Program................................................................................................19<br />

Progress Report.......................................................................................21<br />

Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning Results..................................................27<br />

Mission Statement ................................................................................27<br />

Philosophy of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> ..........................................27<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.................................................................28<br />

Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning Results ..............................................28<br />

Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning Results Review Process....................29<br />

Self­ Study................................................................................................31<br />

Category A: Organization for Student Learning ....................................31<br />

A1. <strong>School</strong> Philosophy and Mission: .................................................31<br />

A2. Governance: ...............................................................................34<br />

A3. <strong>School</strong> Leadership Criterion .......................................................37<br />

A4. Staff ............................................................................................43<br />

A5. <strong>School</strong> Environment....................................................................46<br />

A6. Reporting Student Progress .......................................................51<br />

A7. <strong>School</strong> Improvement Process.....................................................54<br />

Category B: Curriculum & Instruction....................................................57<br />

B1. What Students Learn..................................................................57<br />

B2. Curriculum and Instruction criterion: How students learn............66<br />

B3 Curriculum and Instruction Criterion: How Assessment is Used.73<br />

Category C: Support for Student Spiritual, Personal, and Academic<br />

Growth ..................................................................................................78<br />

C1. Campus Ministry/Community Based Service Learning...............78<br />

C2. Student Connectedness Criterion...............................................83<br />

C3. Parent/Community Involvement..................................................93<br />

Category D: Resource Management and Development .................... 100<br />

D1. Resources ................................................................................100<br />

D2. Resource Planning ................................................................... 104<br />

D3. <strong>School</strong> Finance Resources....................................................... 106<br />

D4. Enrollment Resources .............................................................. 110<br />

D5. Development Resources .......................................................... 113<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

2


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007 .....................................117<br />

Appendix A .........................................................................................125<br />

Administrative Structures ................................................................125<br />

Campus Facilities Map....................................................................128<br />

Bell Schedule 2007­2008................................................................129<br />

Calendar Activities .......................................................................... 130<br />

Summary of Personnel Data ........................................................... 131<br />

Technology Summer ’07 Training Schedule ................................... 132<br />

Professional Development Action Plan ........................................... 133<br />

New Teacher Orientation Agendas .................................................139<br />

Student Survey Questions .............................................................. 142<br />

Student Survey Analysis .................................................................145<br />

Faculty and Staff Survey Questions................................................146<br />

Faculty and Staff Survey Analysis................................................... 148<br />

Parent Survey Questions ................................................................151<br />

Parent Survey Analysis................................................................... 154<br />

Alumni Survey Questions................................................................157<br />

Alumni Survey Analysis................................................................... 159<br />

Appendix B .........................................................................................161<br />

Advanced Placement Results .........................................................161<br />

NEDT Program Score Reports........................................................162<br />

National Merit Recognition.............................................................. 162<br />

SAT Historical Data.........................................................................163<br />

HSPT Historical Results.................................................................. 163<br />

Appendix C .........................................................................................164<br />

Clubs and Organizations.................................................................164<br />

Athletic Program .............................................................................165<br />

Athletic Enrollment Breakdown ....................................................... 167<br />

Campus Ministry and Christian Service .......................................... 168<br />

Appendix D .........................................................................................169<br />

Applicant <strong>School</strong>s............................................................................169<br />

2007 Freshmen Applicants .............................................................170<br />

Tuition History 2001­2008............................................................... 170<br />

Information for College Admissions Officers ................................... 171<br />

Profile of the Class of 2006 .............................................................172<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

3


General Information<br />

Preface<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> has experienced significant changes since<br />

the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> accreditation of 2001. The most compelling change<br />

occurred in July 2005 when the Diocese of Oakland, under the direction of<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> Allen H. Vigneron, established a President/Principal model of<br />

governance with a Board of Regents of Limited Jurisdiction.<br />

Consequently, for the first time in the history of the school, the governance<br />

of the school is under the direction of a lay president and principal. Since<br />

the new administration started immediately preceding a <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong><br />

year, an additional year of preparation beyond the traditional six years was<br />

requested and granted to maintain continuity of purpose.<br />

Concurrent to the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> process, the school engaged in a<br />

Strategic Planning process targeted at identifying assumptions, goals, and<br />

objectives for the next ten years. This process involved the major<br />

stakeholders of the school in meetings, discussions, retreats, and<br />

activities designed to generate a plan to guide the growth and direction of<br />

the school. The combined efforts of both processes resulted in the<br />

school’s Action Plan.<br />

Focus on Learning Process<br />

The recent Focus on Learning process started in spring 2006 with the<br />

appointment of the Self­Study Co­chairs. With the assistance of the<br />

Director of Information Services, work began on developing student,<br />

faculty, parent, and alumni surveys during summer 2006. Survey<br />

distribution occurred at the beginning of the 2006­2007 school year with<br />

results posted for all team members in a shared space on Blackboard®. In<br />

August, the Leadership Team formed with members including the<br />

President, Principal, Assistant Principal for Academics, Assistant Principal<br />

for Campus Ministry, Vice President for Advancement, Director of<br />

Curriculum and Instruction, Special Council to the President, Chairman of<br />

the Board of Regents, Parent Association Representative, and the Focus<br />

Group chairs. The team established Focus Group membership with<br />

approximately 20 members in each, 23 Home Groups, and the Student<br />

and Community Profile committee. Additionally, the Leadership Team<br />

established the processes, committees, and timeline necessary to<br />

implement the combined <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> and Strategic Plan initiatives<br />

involving all <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd constituencies.<br />

The ESLR Review Committee finalized its work on September 12, 2006<br />

and the Self­Study Co­Chairs introduced the formal Focus on Learning<br />

process to the faculty, staff, and parent representatives at a school­wide<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

4


in­service on September 29, 2006. Participants discussed the newly<br />

revised Mission, Philosophy, ESLRs, survey results, and Home Group and<br />

Focus Group assignments. Focus Groups and Home Groups gathered<br />

and analyzed evidence and discussed the Self­Study process at<br />

Academic Council meetings, department meetings, and teacher inservices.<br />

Focus Groups reviewed Home Group evidence and survey<br />

results and prepared reports based on the Self­Study Guide Questions for<br />

their respective areas. In February 2007, Leadership Team members<br />

evaluated the areas of strength and areas of growth drafted by the Focus<br />

Groups.<br />

Strategic Planning committees, with the guidance of Catholic <strong>School</strong><br />

Management (CSM), formed and initiated work in September 2006. The<br />

11 committees met regularly from September through December to draft a<br />

set of assumptions and objectives in preparation for the Strategic Planning<br />

Retreat. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd hosted over 75 participants for the Strategic<br />

Planning Retreat on February 2­3, 2007 resulting in the formation of 11<br />

Strategic Planning goals.<br />

The Leadership Team presented the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> areas of growth and<br />

the Strategic Planning goals to faculty, staff, parents, students, and<br />

representatives of the Board of Regents during a full day in­service on<br />

March 20, 2007. Focus Group discussions and activities resulted in a<br />

combined Action Plan document that incorporated the goals from both<br />

groups.<br />

The President presented the Action Plan to the Board of Regents at its<br />

year­end session on May 8, 2007. Finally, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd hosted a followup<br />

Strategic Planning Retreat on June 6 to finalize and confirm the goals,<br />

objectives, and Action Plan.<br />

The President, Principal, and Board of Regents of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd wish to<br />

acknowledge the tremendous commitment of time, effort, and talent of all<br />

who have contributed to the preparation of this report.<br />

“I like the diversity at O’Dowd and feel like<br />

the counselors are very helpful.”<br />

– Student Surveys<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

5


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Timeline<br />

DATE EVENT RESPONSIBLE<br />

9/2006 Determine participants for the Strategic<br />

Planning (SP) Retreat<br />

Compile <strong>School</strong> Profile Data<br />

ESLR Review Process<br />

President/Principal<br />

Profile Committee<br />

Co­Chairs<br />

Review Committee<br />

9/1/2006 Draft SP Assumptions due<br />

Determine Participants for Strategic<br />

Planning Retreat<br />

Administration &<br />

Planning Committee<br />

President/Principal<br />

9­10/2006 Prepare SP Assessment Narratives Committees<br />

9/1­15/2006 Prepare Student, Parent, Faculty, and<br />

Alumni <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Surveys<br />

9/12/2006 <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Faculty Meeting<br />

Focus Group Meetings<br />

Parent Presentation<br />

Director of Information<br />

Services<br />

Co­Chairs<br />

9/7­12/2006 Recruit and Train Home Group Leaders Co­Chairs<br />

9/19/2006 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

9/18­22/2006 Strategic Planning Committee Meetings Co­Chairs<br />

9/22/2006 Department Meetings – Home Groups Co­Chairs<br />

9/26/2006 Faculty In­service – <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Co­Chairs<br />

9­10/2006<br />

10/3/2006<br />

Home Group Work<br />

Strategic Planning Meeting<br />

Co­Chairs<br />

President/Principal<br />

10/10/2006 Faculty Meeting Co­Chairs<br />

10/16/2006 Department Meetings Co­Chairs<br />

10/31/2006 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

Academic Council<br />

Co­Chairs<br />

11/1/2006 Faculty Meeting Co­Chairs<br />

11/3/2006 Finalize assessment narratives President/Principal<br />

11/14/2006 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

Dept Meetings – Finalize Handbooks Co­Chairs<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

6


11/28/2006 Strategic Planning Meeting<br />

Assessment Narratives to Retreat<br />

Participants<br />

Academic Council<br />

President/Principal<br />

President/Principal<br />

Co­Chairs<br />

12/1/2006 Faculty Meeting Co­Chairs<br />

12/6/2006 Department Meetings Co­Chairs<br />

12/12/2006 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

12/18/2006 Responses to Study Packets to CSM Planning Retreat<br />

Participants<br />

1/5/2007 Faculty In­service Day<br />

<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong><br />

Co­Chairs<br />

1/9/2007 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

1/19/2007 Summary Report to SP Retreat<br />

Participants<br />

CSM<br />

1/23/2007 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

Faculty Meeting<br />

Co­Chairs<br />

2/2­3/2007 Strategic Planning Retreat CSM<br />

2/6/2007 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

2/13/2007 Faculty Meeting Co­Chairs<br />

2/21/2007 Strategic Planning Meeting President/Principal<br />

2/23/2007 Department Meetings Co­Chairs<br />

3/20/2007 <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/SP In­Service Co­Chairs<br />

3/28/2007 Finalize Goals Co­Chairs<br />

4/3/2007 Finalize <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> FG Reports, Co­Chairs<br />

Profile<br />

5/4/2007 Finalize Action Plan Co­Chairs<br />

5/8/2007 Present Action Plan to Board President<br />

6/6/2007 Present Action Plan to Retreat Team CSM<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

7


Committee Assignments<br />

Self­Study Core Leadership Team 2006­2007<br />

Stephen Phelps, Ed.D., President<br />

Joseph Salamack, III, M.A., Principal<br />

Gio Welch, Board of Regents President<br />

Lisa Tortorich, M.A. Self­Study Co­Chairperson<br />

Janet Vax, Self­Study Co­Chairperson<br />

Focus Group Category A:<br />

Organization for Student Learning<br />

Chairpersons:<br />

Stephen Phelps<br />

Renee Early<br />

Students:<br />

Tim Kerbavaz<br />

Briana Votto<br />

Faculty/Staff:<br />

Carlos Arriaga<br />

Ginny Arechiga<br />

Jeff Beeby<br />

Fritz Blume<br />

Judy Coleman<br />

Sharon Correia<br />

Lisa Curet<br />

Brian Cushing<br />

Else Dittmer<br />

Amy Fielder<br />

Cynthia Funai<br />

Tommy Haines<br />

Paul Jackson<br />

Dennis Kohles<br />

Joy Lopez<br />

Alex Macmillan<br />

Sandi Manifesto<br />

Diana Murray<br />

Greg Moore<br />

Lorin Peters<br />

Paul Perenon<br />

Mike Rieder<br />

Leonard Rossi<br />

Joseph Salamack<br />

Lina Schoendorf<br />

Peg Valva<br />

Pamela Wagner<br />

Tom Worrel<br />

Gene Yang<br />

Suzanne Young<br />

Focus Group Category B:<br />

Curriculum and Instruction<br />

Chairperson:<br />

Katie Pittman<br />

Students:<br />

Keji Fatona<br />

Keri Ishibashi<br />

Anne Marcuzzo<br />

Emily Perales<br />

Brandon Pinkard­Scott<br />

Allison Plaisance<br />

Faculty/Staff:<br />

Elissa Accardo<br />

Romeo Baldeviso<br />

Tom Beatty<br />

Sarah Bremer<br />

Jennifer Carlisle<br />

Annette Counts<br />

Pat Cross<br />

Bonnie Davis<br />

Liza Dodd<br />

Dennis Dougherty<br />

Laura Fine<br />

Susan Galindo<br />

Tony Green<br />

Julie Guilfoy<br />

Martha Hawkins<br />

David Hodul<br />

Jodie Jonas<br />

Mary Kamian<br />

Debra Kolsrud<br />

Ray Lehner<br />

Dorothy Lubin<br />

Michael Lucas<br />

Dona McCabe<br />

Tim Newman<br />

Ashley Nulph<br />

Zachary Polsky<br />

Karen Proehl<br />

Fred Randolph<br />

Kathy Riley<br />

Frank Rooney<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

8


Focus Group Category B:<br />

Curriculum and Instruction (cont.)<br />

Javier Sanchez<br />

Louis Segura<br />

Wayne Shaffer<br />

Bonnie Sussman<br />

Jon Thorpe<br />

Gretchen Tornabene<br />

Sara Troyani<br />

Michael Turnacliff<br />

Doug Vierra<br />

Douglas Vierra Jr.<br />

Ute von Doyen<br />

George Watson<br />

Lani Wolf<br />

Focus Group Category C:<br />

Support for Student Personal and<br />

Academic Growth<br />

Chairpersons:<br />

Fran Warmerdam<br />

Rachel Pinette<br />

Students:<br />

Caroline Caselli<br />

Caitlin Meyer<br />

Arianna Parsons<br />

Parents:<br />

Lynn Hutchins<br />

Kathy Knutson<br />

Faculty/Staff:<br />

Cora Antonio<br />

Sara Bauermeister<br />

Holly Brown<br />

Mike Bowler<br />

Summer Dittmer<br />

Marc Dominguez<br />

Prescilla Gonzalez<br />

Marguerite Green<br />

Brian Judd<br />

Chris Kyriacou<br />

Mark Lederer<br />

Bill Lyons<br />

Eva Marlatt<br />

Jennifer Mullin<br />

Lisa Mahoney<br />

Gary Mason<br />

Trina Oliver<br />

Dick Roza<br />

Kathy Soller<br />

Laurie Thirion<br />

Focus Group D:<br />

Resource Management and<br />

Development<br />

Chairpersons:<br />

Steve Depetris<br />

Michael Petrini<br />

Student:<br />

Megan McFarland<br />

Faculty/Staff:<br />

Sondra Arnsdorf<br />

Claude Barnes<br />

Anton Brammer<br />

Kathleen Clapp<br />

Christine Cooke<br />

Kevin Cushing<br />

Jeanne Dupont<br />

Tommy Gilbert<br />

Don Goss<br />

Joan Grell<br />

Michelle Hawkins<br />

Kathy Hodson<br />

Sharon Huff<br />

Tyler Kreitz<br />

Jaz Kumar<br />

Alberto Loyola<br />

Nancy MacKinnon<br />

Dan Malmgren<br />

Briana Miller<br />

Lys Pence<br />

Michael Petrini<br />

Candy Promes<br />

Thien Pham<br />

Annie Prutzman<br />

Steve Twomey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

9


Strategic Planning Committees<br />

Catholic Identity/Charism<br />

Brian Judd, Chair/AP Campus Ministry<br />

Stephen Phelps, President<br />

Fr. Leo Edgerly, Pastor, Corpus Christi Parish<br />

Dennis Ring, Parent<br />

Doug Vierra, Chair Religious Studies<br />

Sr. Rose Marie Hennessy, Regent<br />

Ray Lehner, Teacher<br />

Rachel Pinette, Teacher<br />

Development/Public Relations<br />

Steven Burke, Regent, Parent<br />

Kathy Dwyer, Parent<br />

Cynthia Funai, Counsel to the President<br />

Michelle Hawkins, Dir of Annual Giving<br />

Doug Litke, Parent<br />

Lisa Coffey Mahoney ’76,<br />

Communications Dir.<br />

Linda Spencer, Parent<br />

Ownership/Governance/Administration<br />

Stephen Phelps, Chair, President<br />

Evelyn Dilsaver, Parent, Regent<br />

Joseph Salamack, Principal, Parent<br />

Janet Vax, <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Co­Chair<br />

Gio Welch ’86, President Board of Regents<br />

Staffing<br />

Stephen Phelps, Chair, President<br />

Steve Depetris, Director of Finance<br />

Cynthia Funai, Counsel to the President<br />

Joseph Salamack, Principal, Parent<br />

Lisa Tortorich, AP Academics<br />

Janet Vax, <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Co­Chair<br />

Curriculum/Programs<br />

Lisa Tortorich, Chair, AP Academics<br />

Alison Burke, Parent<br />

Mary Ishihara, Parent<br />

Jodie Jonas, Teacher<br />

Doreen Jones, Regent<br />

Neuritsa Lancaster, President Parent Assoc.<br />

Michael Lucas, Teacher<br />

Karen Proehl, Teacher<br />

Sheila Ring, Parent<br />

Deborah Roosevelt, Regent<br />

Joseph Salamack, Principal, Parent<br />

Lina Schoendorf, Teacher, Parent<br />

<strong>School</strong> in the Community<br />

Joseph Salamack, Chair, Principal,<br />

Sondra Arnsdorf, Dean<br />

Sara Bauermeister, Teacher<br />

Lisa Curet, Web Master<br />

Cynthia Funai, Counsel to the President<br />

Michelle Hawkins, Dir of Annual Giving<br />

Regina Jackson ’80, Regent<br />

Lisa Coffey Mahoney ’76,<br />

Communications Dir.<br />

Fr.Jay Matthews, Pastor St. Benedict<br />

Stephen Phelps, President<br />

Brian Rogers ’91, Regent<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

10


Counseling<br />

Janet Vax, Chair, <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Co­Chair<br />

Anne Bookin, Parent<br />

Cynthia Funai, Counsel to the President<br />

Michelle Hawkins, Dir. Annual Giving, Parent<br />

Kathy Knutsen, Parent<br />

Lisa Tortorich, AP. Academics,<br />

<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Co­Chair<br />

Fran Warmerdam, Dir. of Counseling, Parent<br />

Finance<br />

Robert Jones ’63, Chair, Regent<br />

Steve Depetris, Dir of Finance, Parent<br />

Evelyn Dilsaver, Regent, Parent<br />

Cynthia Funai, Counsel to the President<br />

Steve Ghiglieri, Regent, Parent<br />

Enrico Hernandez, Regent<br />

Enrollment<br />

Joseph Salamack, Chair, Principal, Parent<br />

Cynthia Funai, Counsel to the President<br />

Regina Jackson ’80, Regent<br />

Lys Pence, Dir. of Admissions, Parent<br />

Stephen Phelps, President<br />

Leslie Robertson ’81, Parent<br />

Deborah Roosevelt, Regent, Parent<br />

Nicole Shaw ’81, Alumnae<br />

Diane Smahlik ’62, Regent, Parent<br />

Lisa Tortorich, AP Academics<br />

Facilities<br />

Gio Welch ’86, Chair, Regent<br />

Peter Belanger, Parent<br />

Mike Bowler, Athletic Director, Parent<br />

Steve Depetris, Dir. of Finance, Parent<br />

Sr. Kathy Lang, Regent<br />

Dan Malmgrem, Dir. Buildings & Grounds<br />

Paul Perenon, Teacher, Parent<br />

Stephen Phelps, President<br />

Annie Prutzman, Teacher<br />

Greg Schopf, Parent<br />

Burl Toler, Regent, Parent<br />

Technology<br />

Joy Lopez, Chair, Dir. Technology<br />

Susan Bailey, Parent<br />

Romeo Baldeviso, Teacher<br />

Kevin Cushing, AP Campus Life<br />

Steven dos Remedios, Community Member<br />

Paul Jackson, Dir. Technology Infrastructure<br />

Stephen Phelps, President<br />

Lisa Tortorich, AP Academics<br />

Gene Yang, Dir. of Technology Services<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

11


Student and Community Profile<br />

History<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is a Roman Catholic co­educational college<br />

preparatory high school located in the city of Oakland, in the County of<br />

Alameda. Named in honor of <strong>Bishop</strong> James T. O’Dowd, the Auxiliary<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> of San Francisco and Archdiocesan Superintendent of <strong>School</strong>s,<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> formed in order to address the needs of the<br />

population of the San Francisco Archdiocese.<br />

John Joseph Mitty, Archbishop of San Francisco, established <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

<strong>O'Dowd</strong> as a Catholic, co­instructional high school in September 1951 on<br />

the St. Louis Bertrand elementary school campus. The original student<br />

body of 120 students was administered by Fr. Mark J. Hurley, Principal,<br />

two Diocesan priests, and four Adrian Dominican Sisters. In September<br />

1952, classes met for the first time on the present campus. A grade level<br />

was added each year until the school reached an enrollment of 900<br />

students with the Class of 1955 as the first graduates. Diocesan priests<br />

administered the school until the new Diocese of Oakland formed in 1962.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> Aldin Begin transferred the administration of the school to the<br />

Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate who administered the school from<br />

1966­1978. Under their direction, the school became fully co­educational<br />

and built a reputation for academic excellence as well as distinction in<br />

athletics and performing arts. In 1978, the Diocese transferred the<br />

administration of the school to the Congregation of St. Basil. The Adrian<br />

Dominican Sisters continued to staff the school until 1984 when they<br />

withdrew due to declining numbers. The Basilian Fathers initiated major<br />

physical changes to the campus including a football field with bleachers,<br />

additional parking, new computer labs, additional classroom wing,<br />

expanded library, and theater facilities. On July 1, 2005, the Diocese of<br />

Oakland established a President/Principal model of governance with a<br />

Board of Regents of Limited Jurisdiction.<br />

Demographics and <strong>School</strong> Site<br />

The population of Alameda County is approximately 1,510,000 with<br />

410,000 living in the city of Oakland, and the remaining population in 13<br />

cities and unincorporated areas.<br />

The city of Oakland is composed of the following ethnic groups: 34%<br />

African­American, 30% European­American, 21% Latino, 14% Asian<br />

American, and less than 1% other. The average household income in the<br />

county has increased by 9.05% in the last ten years to approximately<br />

61,000. In the city of Oakland, which has the lowest average income in the<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

12


county, the income growth rate is 15.7% and the median home price is<br />

$650,000. Due to the increased cost of living, retaining and hiring qualified<br />

teachers becomes challenging.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is located on a 14.5­acre campus bordered<br />

by Stearns Avenue, 98 th Avenue, and the East Bay Municipal Utility<br />

District reservoir. The school has one major entrance and exit with an<br />

additional drop­off area on 98 th Avenue added in 2001.The widening of<br />

98 th Avenue, a major artery between <strong>High</strong>ways 580 and 880 and an<br />

approach to the Oakland airport, has resulted in increased traffic flow.<br />

Parking limitations have had an impact on available spaces for student<br />

drivers. The increase in traffic and the need for parking space have<br />

necessitated an on­going dialogue with the Toler Heights Neighborhood<br />

Association. The school continues to explore mutually acceptable<br />

solutions. In summer 2006, the administration expanded the lower parking<br />

lot to provide more on­campus student parking.<br />

Originally built for 750 students, the school expanded in the 1960s with the<br />

addition of portable classrooms and a cafeteria­annex to serve as many<br />

as 1,200 students. A music and drama building was added in the 1970s<br />

and the library was expanded in 1985. In 1988, the school installed an<br />

elevator in the classroom building and restroom remodeling occurred in<br />

the administration and classroom buildings in order to accommodate<br />

handicapped accessibility regulations. In 1992, a ten­classroom addition<br />

replaced the thirty­year­old portables and provided extra instructional<br />

space. In 2000, the new Performing Arts Theatre was completed and an<br />

all­weather athletic field constructed. Currently, <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> has 36 classrooms, four science labs, three computer labs, one<br />

band room, and one drama room.<br />

Significant reforms in the technology program have occurred since the last<br />

<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> visit. In 2001, the school hosted approximately 220<br />

computers on campus with 140 of those computers dedicated to student<br />

use. At that time, there were seven servers, no off­site access to schoolbased<br />

services and minimal WiFi availability. By 2006, there were 420<br />

computers on campus with 200 dedicated to student use. Fourteen<br />

servers manage the various programs including video surveillance, voice<br />

mail management, video­on­demand, online learning, and the student<br />

management system with parental portal. There is offsite access to email,<br />

file storage, printing services, grade reporting, and online learning. The<br />

school initiated wireless services for the campus in 2002. In 2006, WiFi<br />

access expanded and teachers received tablet computers equipped with<br />

essential educational software programs. Eighteen remodeled classrooms<br />

now include wireless, ceiling mounted LCD projectors with DVD/VCR<br />

players with TV tuner and classroom sound systems. In addition, six<br />

science classrooms and labs are equipped with ceiling­mounted<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

13


projectors. Cart­mounted projectors are available for teacher use and<br />

printers are located throughout the plant. Teachers and students print to<br />

these computers from both on and off campus.<br />

Student Profile<br />

A majority of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> students reside within the<br />

borders of Alameda County. The present student body of 1,180 is<br />

comprised of 313 freshmen, 317 sophomores, 266 juniors, and 284<br />

seniors. The student body is composed of the following ethnic groups:<br />

53.7% European American, 14.5% African American, 8.5% Asian/Pacific<br />

Islander, 5.5% Hispanic, 2.5% Filipino, and 0.3% Native American. A<br />

growing number of students, 15%, identify themselves as “Other” for the<br />

census. The student body is approximately equally divided between male<br />

and female students. Census numbers indicate 53% identifying<br />

themselves as Catholic.<br />

Other<br />

1%<br />

Orthodox<br />

1%<br />

none<br />

4%<br />

Enrollment by Religion<br />

2006­2007 <strong>School</strong>­year<br />

unknown<br />

13%<br />

Buddist<br />

1%<br />

Roman Catholic<br />

53%<br />

Protestant<br />

22% Jewish<br />

5%<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd attracts students from schools throughout the city of<br />

Oakland and Alameda County. The majority of students apply from<br />

Catholic schools, private schools, and public schools, respectively.<br />

Since 2000, the number of students taking the entrance exam has<br />

averaged 515. In 2001­02, the school experienced the beginning of a<br />

decline in new student applications with a low of 435 applicants in the<br />

2004­05. Applicants increased to 500 in 2005­2006. For 2007­2008, new<br />

applicants numbered 550. Four hundred and seventy students were<br />

accepted and 315 began the school year in August 2007. Twenty transfer<br />

students enrolled in 2007­08. Each year, between 50 and 60 students<br />

apply with documented learning differences.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

14


Overall, entrance test scores (<strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> Placement Test, HSPT) for the<br />

last three years indicate an increase in scores in the top quartile and a<br />

decrease in scores below the 15% percentile.<br />

80<br />

HSPT Examination Scores<br />

Class of 2009, 2010, 2011<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Top quartile Above 50% Below 50%<br />

Category<br />

2009 2010 2011<br />

In October, all freshmen take the National Educational Developmental<br />

Test (NEDT). Following a two­year decline in test scores with the class of<br />

2008 and 2009, scores have increased with the class of 2010. Compared<br />

to the top quartile trends of the HSPT, it is projected that NEDT scores for<br />

the incoming class will continue to trend upwards (see Appendix B)<br />

Composite NEDT Program Score<br />

86<br />

85<br />

84<br />

82<br />

82 82<br />

82<br />

80<br />

80<br />

78<br />

78<br />

78<br />

78<br />

76<br />

74<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Class of<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

15


Each year all juniors take the PSAT. Scores from the PSAT determine<br />

National Merit Scholarship recognition. The school has seen a significant<br />

decrease in the number of recognized student scholars down from a high<br />

of 44 for the class of 2002 to 17 for the class of 2007.<br />

Number of National Merit Scholarship Recognition<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

39<br />

35<br />

33<br />

34<br />

37<br />

33<br />

39<br />

44<br />

34<br />

29<br />

25<br />

20<br />

23<br />

23<br />

15<br />

10<br />

15<br />

17<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Years<br />

Continuing in the junior and senior years, students take the SAT<br />

Reasoning Test (formerly known as the SAT­I). <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd scores<br />

declined in 2005­2006 after remaining constant for the previous three<br />

years.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>' Historical SAT Scores<br />

600<br />

590<br />

580<br />

570<br />

560<br />

550<br />

540<br />

530<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Year Tested<br />

Verbal<br />

Math<br />

In addition, overall scores on the Advanced Placement (AP) exams also<br />

declined beginning in 2004 through 2006. Scores are slowly on the<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

16


increase, but remain down from a pass rate of approximately 75% to 60%<br />

(see Appendix B)<br />

Total Advanced Placement<br />

Test Pass Rate<br />

100%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

85%<br />

80%<br />

75%<br />

78%<br />

75%<br />

70%<br />

65%<br />

74%<br />

68%<br />

60%<br />

55%<br />

58%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Tested Years<br />

In summary, scores for the HSPT and NEDT are increasing while the<br />

results of National Merit Scholar Recognition, SAT scores, and AP pass<br />

rates are down. With the change of administration in 2005, a major shift in<br />

admissions policies occurred which placed a higher emphasis on incoming<br />

student HSPT test scores and 7 th and 8 th grade grades. As a result, the<br />

incoming classes of the last two admissions cycles reflect an increase in<br />

composite HSPT scores and an increase in NEDT scores for the class of<br />

2010. If current trends continue, classes admitted under the new<br />

admissions policies should reflect an overall increase in standardized test<br />

scores.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Administration<br />

The President, Principal, Assistant Principal for Academics, Assistant<br />

Principal for Campus Ministry, Assistant Principal for Campus Life, Vice<br />

President for Advancement, and the Director of Finance and Facilities<br />

serve on the Executive Council, which oversees internal affairs, academic<br />

affairs, student affairs, and teaching personnel. The Directors of Activities,<br />

Athletics, and Counseling, Principal, Assistant Principal for Academics,<br />

Assistant Principal of Campus Ministry, Assistant Principal for Campus<br />

Life, Vice President for Advancement, the Deans of Students and the<br />

President (ex officio), serve on the Directors’ Council and manage the<br />

day­to­day operations of the school (see Appendix A). Other mid­level<br />

administrators serve as directors of programs around campus.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

17


Teacher Profile<br />

The faculty consists of 78 instructors: 61 full­time instructors, six part­time<br />

and 11 instructors who teach and hold other school positions. Of the 78<br />

instructors, 50 hold teaching credentials and eight are currently pursuing a<br />

credential. Forty teachers possess a Masters degree with six currently<br />

pursuing a Masters degree. Four teachers hold a Doctorate degree with<br />

two pursuing a Doctorate of Education. Of the 28 non­credentialed<br />

teachers, seven are in the Religious Studies department and eight are in<br />

the Fine Arts Department. These teachers all possess a BA or MA in their<br />

fields. Of the remaining 13 non­credentialed teachers, seven have<br />

advanced degrees in their fields. Two have bachelor degrees in their<br />

teaching field, four have a BA or MA in their non­teaching field (see<br />

Appendix A).<br />

Eighty­four percent of the faculty and staff identify themselves as Catholic.<br />

The ethnic diversity of the faculty is as follows: 81% European­American,<br />

7% Asian American, 5% Latino, 5% African­American, 1% Native<br />

American, 1% Pacific Islander, and 2% other. The graph below compares<br />

the ethnic composition of the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd student body, faculty, and<br />

the population of Alameda County.<br />

Ethnic Comparison<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

Percentage of Population<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

African­American Asian­American<br />

European­<br />

American<br />

Latin American Native American Other Pacific Islander<br />

Student 15% 8% 47% 5% 1% 20% 4%<br />

Faculty 5% 7% 81% 5% 1% 2% 1%<br />

Alameda Co. 14% 24% 38% 20% 1% 2% 1%<br />

Ethnicity<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

18


The average tenure of teachers is ten years. The average number of<br />

years of experience in education is 16 years. Eight of the faculty members<br />

are alumni.<br />

Program<br />

Current tuition and fees are $12,600 (see Appendix D). Approximately<br />

20% of the student body receives financial assistance through <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd. Eighty­five percent of financial assistance derives from the<br />

school budget, 3% from endowment income, and 12% from foundations.<br />

The school reflects its Catholic identity through the four­year religious<br />

education program, school­wide liturgies, class retreats, and the cocurricular<br />

programs of Campus Ministry and Service Learning. Each<br />

school day begins with a Morning Prayer led by a member of the faculty or<br />

a student. The school day is an alternating day schedule (80 minute<br />

periods) with a weekly rotation of periods. <strong>School</strong> days begin at 8:30 a.m.<br />

and conclude at 3:00 p.m. The alternating day schedule started in 2001<br />

with three special schedules designed to accommodate the extracurricular<br />

and co­curricular programs. The average class size is 26.5<br />

students.<br />

In spring 2000, the Information Technology Department formed to assist<br />

faculty and staff with integrating technology across the curriculum. In<br />

2006, all teachers received laptops and technology training in the areas of<br />

productivity, presentation, and information technology. In 2006­07, the<br />

school introduced Power<strong>School</strong>® to students and families with the goal of<br />

providing more immediate and ongoing access to student progress. In fall<br />

2007, the Counseling Department introduced the college counseling<br />

program Naviance® and Blackboard® replaced individual teacher<br />

websites as the primary online tool for posting student assignments and<br />

class materials.<br />

The Counseling Department consists of five full­time counselors. Four of<br />

the five counselors hold a credential in Pupil Personal Services (PPS),<br />

one has a Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) certification and an MS in<br />

Clinical Counseling. The school offers a wide variety of student support<br />

services. In 2001, a part­time Special Needs Coordinator facilitated<br />

extended time and accommodations for special needs students. In 2004,<br />

the Special Needs Coordinator evolved into a full­time position.<br />

Class of 2006 graduates continuing their education at four­year colleges is<br />

92%. The percentage of students attending two­year colleges is 6% with<br />

the remaining undecided (see Appendix D).<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

19


Parents play an integral role in the school community with numerous<br />

vehicles of communication and support including the Parent Association<br />

and Friends of the Dragon organizations. Parents are regular contributors<br />

to school communication through the Dragon Parent newsletter and<br />

parent grade­level e­mails. Additionally, parents offer financial support<br />

through various fundraising events and assist in organizing and publicizing<br />

parent information evenings.<br />

As a means of strengthening relationships with past graduates, the school<br />

created the Alumni Relations Director position. This director coordinates<br />

reunions, special alumni events, and maintains on­going contact with<br />

alumni. Alumni continue to be involved with the school through class<br />

reunions, as mentors for career guidance, during Career Day, as well as<br />

through fundraising and financial support.<br />

“I feel most of the teachers at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd are excellent<br />

and they really know how to teach well and what they are talking about.<br />

The campus is very well maintained and I feel very comfortable here.<br />

I am able to look forward to school starting again after summer vacation.”<br />

– Student Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

20


Progress Report<br />

The changes since the last <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> visit reflect both the leadership<br />

of the previous administration as well as the present governance of the<br />

school. The following is a narrative of significant changes and Critical<br />

Areas for Follow­up since 2001.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: Clarify and publicize the roles,<br />

responsibilities, and accountability of those governing the school.<br />

The Congregation of St. Basil (Basilian Fathers) administered the school<br />

for the Diocese of Oakland from 1978 until 2005.<br />

Under the leadership of <strong>Bishop</strong> Allen Vigneron of the Diocese of Oakland,<br />

the school engaged in an in­depth Self Study in conjunction with Catholic<br />

<strong>School</strong> Management (CSM). The goal of the Self Study was to assess the<br />

school’s governance model and was the culmination of a ten­year review<br />

of the governance structure. The recommendation of CSM, confirmed by<br />

the <strong>Bishop</strong>, was to establish a President/Principal model administered by<br />

laity.<br />

In spring 2005, after an extensive search, the Board welcomed the new<br />

President of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> who subsequently accepted the<br />

recommendation of the Principal search committee. The new President<br />

and Principal selected a new Assistant Principal of Academics to complete<br />

the new leadership team.<br />

On July 1, 2005, the Diocese of Oakland established a President/Principal<br />

model of governance with a “Board of Limited Jurisdiction” as defined in A<br />

Primer on Educational Governance in the Catholic Church. The Board of<br />

Regents concerns itself with planning and policy issues pertaining to the<br />

general excellence of Catholic education at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.<br />

The new Board of Regents works in close collaboration with the President<br />

of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> and formulates policies and plans that<br />

enable the school to reach established goals.<br />

In spring 2006, the Superior General of the Basilian Fathers reassigned<br />

the Basilian Fathers to staff their three existing Basilian schools.<br />

The need to facilitate the growing programs at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd resulted in<br />

the establishment of two new executive positions including Assistant<br />

Principal for Campus Ministry and Assistant Principal for Campus Life.<br />

The Directors’ Council was created consisting of the Principal, Assistant<br />

Principals, Deans, Director of Student Activities, Vice President for<br />

Advancement, and Director of Counseling. Additionally, the Executive<br />

Council meets regularly and includes the President, Principal, Assistance<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

21


Principals, Vice President for Advancement, and the Director of Finance.<br />

Both councils provide minutes to all faculty and staff on a regular basis.<br />

Under the leadership of the President, the Campus Ministry program<br />

expanded to reflect an emphasis on cultivating Catholic values and the<br />

spiritual formation of the school community. In support of the school’s<br />

Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs, the Campus Ministry program increased<br />

its staffing to meet the criteria in key areas including prayer, liturgy,<br />

retreats, adult spirituality, leadership opportunities, service learning, and<br />

community outreach. The Campus Ministry Team works in collaboration<br />

with the Religious Studies faculty to ensure on­going curriculum<br />

integration. One full­time and three part­time positions expanded the<br />

Campus Ministry staff.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: Implement a school­wide faculty<br />

evaluation and supervision process.<br />

Under the governance of the Basilian Fathers, a plan for the professional<br />

development and accountability of faculty and staff was developed. During<br />

the 2004­05 school year, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd contracted with educational<br />

consultants to offer summer professional development courses including<br />

Studying Skillful Teaching and Teaching with Technology. Additional<br />

courses offered in the summer 2006 and 2007 included Observing and<br />

Analyzing Teaching, Understanding the Role of the Department Chair, and<br />

Understanding by Design. No Child Left Behind funds provided significant<br />

financial support for these professional growth opportunities emphasizing<br />

best practices in curriculum design and the faculty evaluation and<br />

supervision process. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd has increased emphasis on clinical<br />

supervision by requiring all department chairs to enroll in the seven­day<br />

course, Observing and Analyzing Teaching and by offering on­going<br />

support and training for delivering both formal and informal observations.<br />

In fall 2007, the Principal appointed a new Director of Curriculum and<br />

Instruction to assist the Principal and Assistant Principal for Academics in<br />

providing support for all teachers and in researching and establishing<br />

effective and systematic faculty supervision and evaluation processes.<br />

Recently, the school initiated a Peer Mentoring Program designed to train<br />

a team of mentors in developing and delivering on­going peer support,<br />

observation, and collaboration within a professional learning community.<br />

Additionally, this program offers wider support for new teachers in<br />

cognitive coaching as well as cultivating a sense of school mission within<br />

new hires. Peer mentors receive compensation and professional training<br />

from outside consultants.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

22


All <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd faculty and staff now receive an annual performance<br />

appraisal. Faculty and staff meet with their supervisor in the spring of each<br />

year to review performance and to set goals for the coming year.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: Provide more faculty resources<br />

designed for students with learning disabilities.<br />

Under the new leadership, the school hired one full­time counselor to<br />

support students with learning differences and assist teachers in<br />

implementing effective and appropriate instructional strategies for<br />

addressing students with learning differences. Students qualifying for the<br />

Learning Needs Program must have a documented learning disability. The<br />

Learning Needs Program offers preliminary diagnostic testing for students<br />

and families. There are currently 50 students in the Learning Needs<br />

Program. The Director for Learning Differences reviews diagnostic reports,<br />

develops individualized accommodations and modifications plans for<br />

students, and establishes on­going communication with the teachers of<br />

students with learning needs. Consequently, a critical role for the Director<br />

of Learning Needs is to educate and support teachers and parents in<br />

effectively implementing the Learning Needs Program. Individualized<br />

teacher training and educational presentations at department and faculty<br />

meetings as well as parent information evenings offer opportunity for<br />

additional training and support.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: On­going needs to research, evaluate,<br />

and implement additional assessment strategies to enhance student<br />

learning.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: Implementation of additional in­service<br />

and professional growth activities directed at using a variety of<br />

assessment strategies and teaching to a variety of teaching<br />

modalities.<br />

The previous administration introduced alternative assessment strategies<br />

such as student portfolios, research assignments, group projects,<br />

cooperative learning, student performances, and simulations. On­going<br />

professional growth opportunities and summer curriculum grants provide<br />

the time and compensation for faculty and administrators to continue to<br />

learn new and effective assessment strategies for enhancing student<br />

learning. Specifically, the school has contracted with Life­long Learning, a<br />

nationally recognized educational team, to offer on­going training for<br />

teachers in curriculum design and assessment. Life­long Learning has<br />

offered the Understanding by Design workshop for the past two summers<br />

and will be coaching teachers on a monthly basis for the 2007­2008<br />

academic year. This serves as the basis for establishing and developing<br />

professional learning communities with the goal of having teachers<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

23


collaborate on common assessments, analyze assessment data, and<br />

refine instructional strategies.<br />

Additionally, Advanced Placement teachers completed the AP Audit in<br />

June 2007 and are encouraged to attend AP seminars focused on<br />

specialized training for AP assessment strategies.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: Continue to examine the Catholic<br />

identity of the school.<br />

In fall 2005, under the leadership of the new President, the school<br />

engaged in a process to review and revise the current Mission and<br />

Philosophy to reflect the new governance of the school and to serve as a<br />

guide into the 21 st century. The committee consisted of members of the<br />

Board of Regents, faculty, parents, and students. The review process<br />

involved discussions and revisions resulting in a statement that has<br />

received support and praise for its clear communication of Catholic<br />

identity. The new Mission and Philosophy, confirmed and accepted by the<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> and the Superintendent of <strong>School</strong>s, are now proudly displayed<br />

throughout the school, published on the school’s website and featured in<br />

promotional materials and handbooks.<br />

The Mission and Philosophy also generated an ESLR review process.<br />

This resulted in the creation of six global outcomes accompanied by subglobal<br />

items for each. A process for ESLR integration and implementation<br />

is included in the Action Plan.<br />

The Charism Committee, comprised of members of the Board of Regents,<br />

faculty, administration, and parents, initiated the process of charism<br />

identification in fall 2006. In fall 2007, key members of the committee<br />

planned and delivered a faculty in­service focused on charism<br />

identification and discernment.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: Increase coordination and collaboration<br />

among all providers of student support services.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> recognizes the importance of coordination<br />

and collaboration among all providers of student support services.<br />

Consequently, a strategic plan for coordinating academic support services<br />

emerged with positive results including the following programs:<br />

· Dragon Success: Individualized organization and time<br />

management support. Trained adult tutors offer students<br />

specialized curriculum instruction for 90 minutes per week. One<br />

semester commitment required.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

24


· Academic Support Center (Just ASC): Individualized content<br />

area support tutoring offered daily by certified teachers before,<br />

during, and after school.<br />

· Peer Homework Support: Trained peer tutors available daily<br />

before, during (MPs) and after school designed for just­in­time<br />

tutoring for all students.<br />

· Study Hall: Monitored study periods scheduled for students in<br />

need of extra study time.<br />

· Learning Differences: Specialized counseling and academic<br />

support services offered for students and families.<br />

· Technology Support: Full­time drop­in center for students needing<br />

assistance with technology needs.<br />

Critical Area for Follow­up: Create and implement a development<br />

plan to provide endowment funds to attract and retain highly<br />

qualified teachers, to support professional growth, and to build<br />

financial assistance resources for families.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd recognizes the critical need for tuition assistance and the<br />

first priority is to increase endowment funds for financial assistance.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd currently awards over $1,000,000 in tuition assistance.<br />

This figure has increased from approximately $680,000 in 2005. Clearly,<br />

the need for tuition assistance continues to grow as the cost of living in the<br />

Bay Area increases. The school’s operating budget currently funds tuition<br />

assistance and in the last ten years, tuition has more than doubled. <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd’s target is to increase its endowment to a level that provides a<br />

solid foundation for increasing financial assistance and minimizes the<br />

need for tuition increases. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd provides tuition assistance at<br />

the level of 87% of verified need with a goal of keeping the school<br />

accessible to qualified students by providing 100% of verifiable tuition<br />

needs. The school plans to limit tuition increases in order to maintain<br />

affordable education for all families. At this time, the school’s financial<br />

assistance endowment is approximately $1 million with a short­term goal<br />

to build the endowment to $5 million.<br />

The Board of Regents and the administration recognize the need to<br />

establish an endowment fund addressing teacher salaries and<br />

professional growth so that the school is able to continue to attract and<br />

retain highly qualified teachers. By focusing on building the endowment for<br />

financial assistance as a first step, additional funds will be available for<br />

teacher salaries on a more immediate basis.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

25


Critical Area for Follow­up: Implement Phase Two of the New<br />

Century Campaign as soon as possible.<br />

After evaluation of the Phase One New Century Campaign, the<br />

administration determined that Phase Two was not financially feasible.<br />

The new governing board initiated a feasibility study to determine donor<br />

capacity and inclination to support a comprehensive fundraising<br />

campaign.<br />

“The commitment of administrators and faculty to providing<br />

an excellent high school experience is its greatest strength.<br />

They target the development of the whole child<br />

– academically, socially, and spiritually.”<br />

­ Parent Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

26


Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning Results<br />

Mission Statement<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is a Catholic co­educational, college<br />

preparatory high school administered by the Diocese of Oakland, which<br />

affirms the teachings, moral values, and ethical standards of the Catholic<br />

Church. This unique and diverse community strives to develop young men<br />

and women of competence, conscience, and compassion through an<br />

integrated academic, spiritual, and extra­curricular program. <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd seeks to develop persons of influence who are loving, open to<br />

growth, religious, intellectually competent, and skilled leaders committed<br />

to justice and peace.<br />

Philosophy of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> is a coeducational, college preparatory Catholic high<br />

school sponsored by the Diocese of Oakland serving the diverse range of<br />

students in Oakland and surrounding communities. Our integrated<br />

academic, spiritual, and extra­curricular programs develop exemplary<br />

graduates who communicate Christ to others by their lives and enrich<br />

society with Gospel values. Our school is a partnership of students, staff,<br />

parents, the community, and the Diocese of Oakland.<br />

As a Catholic high school, <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> challenges and encourages all<br />

members of its community to be loving and rejoice in our diversity. While<br />

giving preference to Catholics, we welcome students of all faiths who<br />

embrace our philosophy and are willing to contribute to it. We have rooted<br />

our educational philosophy in our Catholic heritage so that our graduates<br />

will care for creation and live extraordinary lives dedicated to building a<br />

moral, just, and peaceful world.<br />

“The teachers are very approachable and helpful.”<br />

– Student Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

27


<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning Results<br />

Guided by the Mission of <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> to prepare students for<br />

lives of spiritual, intellectual, and personal growth, graduates will be:<br />

Academic Achievers who…<br />

• Exhibit knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in college.<br />

• Practice critical thinking and problem solving skills.<br />

• Research, analyze, and synthesize information effectively.<br />

• Demonstrate innovation, creativity, and a love of the arts.<br />

Spiritual Individuals who…<br />

• Demonstrate knowledge and appreciation of Catholic faith and traditions.<br />

• Participate actively in their faith community.<br />

• Respect diversity of religion and culture.<br />

• Make moral, ethical, and healthy choices in daily living.<br />

Effective Communicators who…<br />

• Exhibit expert writing and reading skills.<br />

• Articulate ideas clearly and creatively.<br />

• Use information technology effectively and ethically.<br />

• Understand divergent points of view.<br />

Active Leaders who…<br />

• Model personal integrity, responsibility, and ethical behavior.<br />

• Use emotional and social skills to build collaboration and teamwork.<br />

• Embrace diversity and promote excellence.<br />

• Demonstrate effective decision­making skills.<br />

Responsible Global Citizens who…<br />

• Model human connectedness through a commitment to social justice.<br />

• Respect cultural and ethnic influences.<br />

• Work for a moral, just, and peaceful world.<br />

• Exhibit care and respect for the environment.<br />

Life­long Learners who....<br />

• Demonstrate openness to growth.<br />

• Take responsibility for their own actions and the welfare of others.<br />

• Critically assess the values of contemporary culture in light of the Gospel.<br />

• Promote justice and peace in service to their faith.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

28


Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning Results Review Process<br />

In preparation for the 2001 <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Focus on Learning visit, <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

<strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> engaged in a school­wide process to draft a set of<br />

Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning Results (ESLRs) for current and<br />

prospective graduates. The process resulted in a list of 13 ESLRs that<br />

were adopted by the Board of Regents and confirmed by the faculty, staff,<br />

students, and parents. The school incorporated the ESLRs into all facets<br />

of the school community. These key school standards became the focus<br />

of curriculum planning, instructional supervision, leadership goal setting,<br />

and were visible throughout the school, in school publications, and on the<br />

school’s website.<br />

In fall 2006, the new leadership team initiated the task of reviewing and<br />

revising the previous ESLRs to reflect the newly revised Mission and<br />

Philosophy of the school. The review called for an examination of the<br />

current ESLRs with regard to organization, clarity, and relevance for 21 st<br />

century teaching and learning. The ESLR Review Committee referred to<br />

key documents such as the newly adopted school Mission and<br />

Philosophy, Skills for the 21 st Century, Themes from Catholic Social<br />

Teaching, as well as sample ESLRs from Catholic high schools in the<br />

surrounding community.<br />

Members of the ESLR Review Committee included the President,<br />

Principal, Assistant Principal for Academics, Director of Instructional<br />

Technology, Assistant Principal for Campus Ministry, Director of Annual<br />

Giving, Social Studies Department Chair, Religious Studies Department<br />

Chair, <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Self­Study Co­Chair, Director of Alumni Relations,<br />

two student ASB leaders, and a Parent Association representative.<br />

Committee members communicated with their various constituencies and<br />

met formally three times to share research, discuss suggestions and<br />

concerns, and draft new ESLRs. The first meeting was held on September<br />

8, 2006 with the goal of generating a workable list of global outcomes. At<br />

the September 14 meeting, the committee drafted a preliminary set of<br />

global ESLRs and discussed appropriate sub­global ESLRs. The agenda<br />

for the final meeting on September 27 was to confirm the final draft and<br />

develop the opening statement as the framework for the ESLRs.<br />

The Board of Regents under the leadership of the President approved the<br />

final ESLRs. The <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Co­chairs shared the newly revised<br />

ESLRs with the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd faculty and staff at the September 29<br />

Faculty in­service.<br />

The ESLRs have served and continue to serve as key components in<br />

formulating the Focus on Learning document; have been instrumental in<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

29


guiding the organization of curricular areas, served as a focus of<br />

discussion at Student Council meetings, Academic Council meetings,<br />

Department meetings, Directors’ Council, President’s Council, and faculty<br />

in­service days.<br />

On October 31, 2006 an in­service was conducted with the Academic<br />

Department Chairs with follow­up on January 5, 2007, and February 13,<br />

2007. In subsequent department meetings and Academic Council<br />

meetings, faculty and staff engaged in a process to provide evidence in<br />

support of the newly adopted ESLRs.<br />

“O’Dowd is providing an excellent academic program.<br />

The staff is knowledgeable and they care about individual needs.<br />

Our son is thriving in the atmosphere that O’Dowd is providing.”<br />

– Parent Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

30


Self­ Study<br />

Category A: Organization for Student Learning<br />

A1. <strong>School</strong> Philosophy and Mission:<br />

To what extent has the school established a clear statement of<br />

Philosophy that reflects the beliefs of the institution, a commitment<br />

to Catholic identity, thoroughness of instructions, focus on the<br />

needs of the whole person, and recognizes the dignity of all<br />

members of the school community? To what extent does Philosophy<br />

and Mission reflect parents as primary educators and teachers as<br />

facilitators of learning? To what extent is the Mission defined further<br />

by adopted expected school­wide learning results that form the basis<br />

of the educational program for every student?<br />

With the newly restructured Board and President/Principal model, the<br />

Board, President, Principal, and key leaders revised the Mission to<br />

strengthen focus on Catholic identity in summer 2005. The newly<br />

constituted Board focused on the Mission during their first retreat in July<br />

2005 and later that summer, the <strong>Bishop</strong> of the Diocese of Oakland and the<br />

Board of Regents formally adopted the Mission of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>. Additionally, the key leaders and members of the school<br />

community reviewed the Philosophy in the spring and summer of 2006<br />

and revised it to emphasize Catholic identity and to align more completely<br />

with the Mission. The Board of Regents and <strong>Bishop</strong> accepted these<br />

changes to the Philosophy and the school consequently disseminated the<br />

newly adopted documents to the community.<br />

The newly revised Mission was introduced to the faculty, staff, and parents<br />

at the beginning of 2005­06 and the new school Philosophy introduced to<br />

the faculty, staff, and parents in September 2006. The school website,<br />

Parent/Student Handbook, and all school publications reflect the new<br />

Mission and Philosophy. Ninety­five percent of parents agree that the<br />

Mission accurately characterizes <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>. Eighty<br />

percent of faculty members agree that the Mission and Philosophy are<br />

clearly defined and evident at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd. Seventy­five percent of<br />

students state that they understand the Mission and Philosophy. The<br />

administration recognizes the need to articulate and implement the newly<br />

revised Mission and Philosophy into the life of the school community.<br />

After completing the revision of the Mission and Philosophy, it became<br />

apparent that the Expected Student Learning Results (ESLRs) needed reevaluation.<br />

A committee involving all major stakeholders of the school<br />

formed in fall 2006­07. This committee developed and disseminated a<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

31


series of drafts of revised ESLRs over a period of two months to various<br />

stakeholders. The Leadership Team formally accepted the new ESLRs in<br />

October 2006.<br />

The school values and affirms that the education of our students is a<br />

partnership between parents and the school as evidenced by the<br />

statement in our Philosophy that “Our school is a partnership of students,<br />

staff, parents, the community, and the Diocese of Oakland.” These words<br />

acknowledge the connection between school and home in the education<br />

of students.<br />

The school strengthens the partnership between home and school through<br />

the school website, Power<strong>School</strong>®, course websites on Blackboard®,<br />

Naviance® (college counseling), Dragon Parent (parent magazine),<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd weekly E­news, Teen Challenge parent meetings, grade<br />

level parent workshops, and Student/Parent Handbooks. The school<br />

website includes school­wide information such as schedules, calendars<br />

and announcements, teacher websites, student access to school services,<br />

and library databases. Power<strong>School</strong>®, introduced to parents in winter<br />

2007, is an online grade management program where parents and<br />

students can access current academic progress. Blackboard® and<br />

Naviance® continue the partnership by providing tools for posting critical<br />

class materials and dynamic college counseling information online. These<br />

online technology tools strengthen the partnership between students,<br />

parents, and teachers as they work together to support students in<br />

achieving course outcomes.<br />

The <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> Mission states, “Our integrated<br />

academic, spiritual, and extra­curricular programs develop exemplary<br />

graduates who communicate Christ to others by their lives and enrich<br />

society with Gospel values.” The Expected <strong>School</strong>­wide Learning<br />

Expectations reflect the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd Mission and demonstrate six key<br />

themes: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective<br />

Communicators, Active Leaders, Globally Responsible Citizens, and Lifelong<br />

Learners. The major topics and their descriptors define the learning in<br />

the academic, spiritual, and extra­curricular programs evident at <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>. The ESLRs clearly articulate the outcomes of a<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd education for parents and students. The school needs to<br />

offer opportunity for parents to embrace and understand how the ESLRs<br />

support student educational and spiritual growth. Additionally, the school<br />

should implement a process for communicating the ESLRs and effectively<br />

evaluating outcome achievement.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

32


Areas of Strength<br />

1. The recently revised Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs reflect the vision<br />

of Catholic, college preparatory education at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>.<br />

2. The school strengthens its partnership between home and school<br />

through the school website, Power<strong>School</strong>®, course websites on<br />

Blackboard®, Naviance®, Dragon Parent (parent magazine), <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd E­news weekly update, Teen Challenge parent meetings,<br />

grade level parent workshops, and Student/Parent Handbooks.<br />

Evidence<br />

· <strong>School</strong> website<br />

· Mission, Philosophy, ESLRs<br />

· 2006 Surveys<br />

· The Dragon Parent<br />

· E­news weekly update<br />

· Student/Parent Handbook<br />

· Board Minutes<br />

· Teen Challenge agendas and materials<br />

· 21 st Century Skills<br />

· Parent Workshop Agendas and PowerPoint® presentations<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Develop a plan to raise awareness of the new Mission, Philosophy,<br />

and ESLRs in the school and greater community.<br />

Rationale: After a review of the faculty, student, and staff surveys,<br />

evidence suggests a disparity amongst the various constituencies with<br />

regard to the awareness of the Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs.<br />

2. Develop a process to assist teachers in incorporating and<br />

implementing the new ESLRs into curriculum and instruction.<br />

Rationale: Students and teachers agree on the need to clearly<br />

articulate and more effectively integrate the ESLRs in teaching and<br />

learning.<br />

3. Develop a process for evaluating the extent to which the students are<br />

achieving the ESLRs.<br />

Rationale: Teachers state that they are teaching the ESLRs<br />

informally. Effective evaluative tools and data are critical for<br />

assessment of student achievement of the ESLRs.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

33


A2. Governance:<br />

To what extent does the governing authority, committed to sharing<br />

the Catholic vision, adopt policies which are consistent with the<br />

school’s Philosophy and Mission, and support the achievement of<br />

the expected school­wide learning results for the school? Does the<br />

governing authority delegate implementation of these policies to the<br />

professional staff? Does the governing authority monitor results?<br />

The Board of Regents, the President, and the Principal adopt policies that<br />

are consistent with the school’s Philosophy and Mission and support the<br />

achievement of the ESLRs. The Mission Effectiveness Committee, as a<br />

standing committee of the Board of Regents, ensures that all policies<br />

considered and ultimately adopted by the Board of Regents are consistent<br />

with the school’s Mission and Philosophy. The Superintendent of <strong>School</strong>s<br />

for the Diocese of Oakland also meets with the President and Principal<br />

and the Board Chair to ensure that policies are consistent with the<br />

Mission. One example of the school’s commitment to the Mission and<br />

Philosophy includes the adoption of the revised ESLRs designed clearly<br />

articulate the Mission and Philosophy. In order to ensure school<br />

community ownership of the ESLRS, the governing authority and<br />

administration agree on the need for the development of an annual<br />

process to review ESLR effectiveness.<br />

The expansion of the Campus Ministry Program exemplifies the governing<br />

authority’s commitment to the Mission and Philosophy. In 2006­2007, the<br />

administration elevated the position of the Director of Campus Ministry to<br />

an Assistant Principal for Campus Ministry. The expansion of student<br />

support services also demonstrates the governing authority’s commitment<br />

to the Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs with the appointment of two new<br />

positions including the Director of Learning Needs and the Academic<br />

Support Center Coordinator. In fall 2005, the new administration<br />

developed a series of programs and policies to provide additional support<br />

for struggling students. The Board of Regents clearly demonstrated its<br />

support for these policies and programs by allocating additional funding<br />

and personnel for the Dragon Success Program, Learning Needs<br />

Program, Academic Support Center, Peer Homework Support, an<br />

additional counselor, Summer Curriculum Grants, and enhanced<br />

professional development. These resources and programs have resulted<br />

in earlier and more effective intervention when a student first begins to<br />

have difficulties.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

34


The governing authority delegates all policy implementation to the<br />

professional staff through the President and Principal of the school as<br />

evidenced by the minutes of the Board of Regents meetings. The<br />

President, the Principal, and appropriate members of the administrative<br />

staff and faculty develop the specific details necessary to implement these<br />

policies as evidenced by the minutes from the Executive Council,<br />

Directors’ Council, and other school administrative groups. The governing<br />

authority monitors results through a variety of means. The President<br />

regularly confers with the Board Chair, attends the monthly Board of<br />

Regents meetings, and presents both a written and oral report on the<br />

school’s major programs and their results. The President and other school<br />

administrators attend monthly Board Committee meetings to report on<br />

developments at the school.<br />

Inclusion of Board Members on Strategic Planning Committees affords<br />

them the opportunity to analyze and study student achievement of the<br />

ESLRs. The inclusion of the Board Chair as a member of the<br />

<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Leadership Team provides him the opportunity to monitor<br />

student achievement.<br />

Additionally, the Board of Regents schedules regular presentations by<br />

faculty and students as part of its monthly meetings in order to stay<br />

informed about the key areas of the school. In spring 2007, presentations<br />

to the Board included an overview of Campus Ministry, Admissions, and<br />

Curriculum.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. Evidenced by its willingness to allocate the necessary resources, the<br />

governing authority remains committed to the Mission, Philosophy, and<br />

ESLRs.<br />

2. The governing authority delegates all policy implementation to the staff<br />

through the President and Principal.<br />

3. The governing authority is committed to clear communication between<br />

President, Principal, and Board.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Mission<br />

· Philosophy<br />

· Board Minutes<br />

· Directors Council and Executive Council Minutes<br />

· Board Membership<br />

· <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> and Strategic Planning In­Services<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

35


Area of Growth<br />

1. Promote ownership of the Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs by all<br />

constituencies.<br />

Rationale: When faculty, parents, and coaches work in partnership<br />

toward common goals, a renewed appreciation develops within the<br />

community for Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

36


A3. <strong>School</strong> Leadership Criterion<br />

To what extent does the school leadership encourage the cultivation<br />

of Catholic values and the spiritual formation of the school<br />

community in various ways? To what extent does the school<br />

leadership make decisions to facilitate the actions that focus the<br />

energies of the school on student achievement of the ESLRs? To<br />

what extent does the school leadership empower the staff? To what<br />

extent does the school leadership promote shared accountability for<br />

student learning?<br />

The school leadership encourages the cultivation of Catholic values and<br />

spiritual formation through a variety of opportunities. The expanded<br />

Campus Ministry program oversees and facilitates the various dimensions<br />

of faith and Christian service at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>. These<br />

include liturgies, retreats, charity drives, prayer services, and service<br />

projects. Junior and senior students lead retreats for freshman and<br />

sophomore students. Faculty members facilitate junior and senior retreats<br />

of two and three day duration respectively. The Director of Campus<br />

Ministry position has been elevated to Assistant Principal for Campus<br />

Ministry and now manages a Campus Ministry Team. The team includes<br />

two part­time class­level moderators, two part­time adult spirituality<br />

coordinators, one full­time Service Learning Coordinator, and a half­time<br />

support person.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s Service Learning Program launched in fall 2006.<br />

Students in the class of 2010 are required to complete 100 hours of<br />

service during their four years. Freshmen serve a minimum of 15 hours<br />

volunteering with the elderly within the context of their Hebrew Scripture<br />

course. Sophomores attend a one­day service immersion with their<br />

Catholic Experience class, serving and learning from the homeless.<br />

Juniors complete service within their Christian Morality curriculum. The<br />

administration demonstrates its support of these programs by allocating<br />

the resources and staff necessary to accomplish the goals of the program.<br />

Students and faculty evaluated the Campus Ministry program through the<br />

2006 survey process. The survey results reflect an evaluation of the<br />

former Campus Ministry Program due to the concurrent launching of the<br />

expanded program and the administration of the survey. Student and<br />

faculty surveys indicate that 72% of the teachers affirm that school<br />

liturgies and prayer services are celebrations of who we are as a school<br />

community and 76% of the students state that the Catholic identity of the<br />

school is clear. Fifty­six percent of students state that co­curricular<br />

activities provide support and opportunity for the development of personal<br />

faith. There is need to address the overall student and staff<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

37


connectedness to the Catholic identity of the school. This data suggests<br />

that evaluation and promotion of the expanded Campus Ministry program<br />

should be ongoing.<br />

Ninety­three percent of parents indicate that the school respects Catholic<br />

practices and traditions and that a sense of spirituality is evident at the<br />

school (99%). The parents feel strongly that the school fosters a sense of<br />

community responsibility through its Christian Service programs. (ESLR II)<br />

The school’s ESLRs guide decisions regarding student achievement. For<br />

example, new courses reflect our six ESLR themes including a freshman<br />

Biology option, Connections: Freshman Science Foundations, Italian<br />

Language, AP Psychology, Computer Art II, and History of the Middle<br />

East.<br />

Improvements in tracking and supporting at­risk students reflect the efforts<br />

to ensure student achievement of the ESLRs. The Assistant Principal for<br />

Academics, in partnership with the counseling department, monitors atrisk<br />

students through meetings and review of academic records. The<br />

Director of Learning Needs forms a partnership with students, teachers,<br />

and parents in support of student academic success. This new partnership<br />

directly assists struggling students early in the semester, reducing the<br />

attrition rate due to academic failure and strengthens the overall academic<br />

program. (ESLR I)<br />

Classroom teaching reflects current trends and tools for effective<br />

instructional technology integration. Leveraging innovative technology,<br />

teachers are able to expand their instructional strategies, address diverse<br />

learning styles, and teach 21 st century skills. Providing all teachers with<br />

laptops allows for efficient access to a superior range of technology<br />

programs and additional support for their professional growth. In<br />

responding to the needs of students and parents for enhanced access to<br />

student progress, teachers publish assigned work on Blackboard® and<br />

post grades online through Power<strong>School</strong>®. These tools allow students<br />

immediate access to course requirements, grading policies, assignments,<br />

and grades. The new programs continue to strengthen partnership with<br />

parents and promote student achievement of the ESLRs. (ESLR III)<br />

The school administration is committed to empowering faculty and staff to<br />

foster a culture of collaboration toward a common vision. Faculty members<br />

annually vote for two faculty representatives who regularly communicate<br />

concerns and ideas to the administration. The Academic Council<br />

comprised of the administration, department chairs, and parent and<br />

student representatives, meet monthly to discuss the needs of the<br />

academic departments, set academic policies, and discuss new course<br />

offerings. Additionally, the executive secretary distributes meeting minutes<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

38


to all faculty and staff for Executive Council, Directors’ Council, Academic<br />

Council, and Department Meetings as appropriate.<br />

In spring 2007, the administration initiated a Peer Mentoring Program to<br />

broaden teacher support and enhance the curriculum evaluation<br />

processes. Each department designated key faculty mentors who received<br />

specialized training to assist new and returning teachers. Mentors help<br />

teachers incorporate the ESLRs into their curriculum and instruction, form<br />

collaborative groups, and evaluate and model best practices in their<br />

subject areas. The goal of this mentoring model is to inspire teachers to<br />

collaborate in order to support student achievement of the ESLRs.<br />

Teachers new to the school begin their experience at a New Teacher<br />

Orientation, a two­day in­service designed to provide knowledge of and<br />

familiarity with the school’s Mission, Philosophy and ESLR’s as well as<br />

basics for starting a new school year. New teachers receive a packet of<br />

materials well in advance of the August in­service. The materials include<br />

the New Teacher Handbook, organizational tools, tips for navigating<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd and books designed to address strategies for classroom<br />

management. During the in­service, new teachers build a supportive<br />

learning community that continues to gather at lunchtime throughout the<br />

school year. New teachers also meet their trained peer mentor at this<br />

orientation. Throughout the first year, peer mentors perform formal<br />

observations, complete logs, meet informally with their colleague, and<br />

serve as a guide through the daily operations of the school. At the end of<br />

the school year, new teachers submit an evaluation of the school’s efforts<br />

to welcome and support new teachers. The analysis of the results serves<br />

as a planning tool for program growth.<br />

The leadership has dedicated significant resources to professional growth.<br />

Funds made available through the Professional Development budget and<br />

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) exceeded $200,000 for the 2006­07<br />

academic year. The funds support faculty attendance at seminars,<br />

conferences, courses, advanced degrees, and faculty workshops.<br />

Additionally, the Summer Curriculum Grant Program, $50,000 in 2007­08,<br />

supports teachers in collaborative curriculum development specific to their<br />

departments. Faculty listed support for professional growth as one of their<br />

top areas of strength on the faculty survey. Ninety­one percent of teachers<br />

stated that there is sufficient support and encouragement for their<br />

academic growth.<br />

Evaluations empower and provide direction to the faculty in identifying<br />

areas of strength and growth. Ninety­one percent of teachers feel<br />

supported by their departments in their work with students. However, only<br />

62% of teachers state that professional evaluation is used as an effective<br />

tool for fostering professional growth. In fall 2007, the administration<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

39


created a new position entitled Director of Instruction and Curriculum<br />

designed to assist the Principal and Assistant Principal for Academics in<br />

providing more effective teacher evaluation and support. The need to<br />

develop strategies for a more consistent teacher evaluation program is an<br />

area of growth.<br />

The administration of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> promotes data­driven<br />

decisions when discussing and evaluating student learning and ESLR<br />

effectiveness. Class statistics allow department chairs and administrators<br />

opportunity to compare grades assigned by subject in an effort to create<br />

continuity across teachers and courses. Through analyzing various data<br />

sources, the administration shares the accountability of student learning<br />

with the teachers. In addition, Power<strong>School</strong>® and Blackboard® provide<br />

systemic data evaluation opportunities. Further analysis and synthesis of<br />

data promotes shared accountability for student learning and is an area of<br />

growth.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

40


Areas of Strength<br />

1. The addition of the full­time Assistant Principal for Campus Ministry<br />

and the expansion of the Campus Ministry team enhance the spiritual<br />

leadership and spiritual direction of the school.<br />

2. The administration has demonstrated its support for the Service<br />

Learning Program through the design and major expansion of the<br />

program and the hiring of a full­time Service Learning Coordinator.<br />

3. New programs, courses, and policies continue to strengthen<br />

partnership with parents and have promoted student achievement of<br />

the ESLRs.<br />

4. The administration has demonstrated its commitment to empower<br />

faculty and staff to create a culture in which all work toward a common<br />

vision.<br />

5. Funds made available through the Professional Development budget<br />

and No Child Left Behind (NCLB) exceeded $200,000 for the 2006­07<br />

academic year.<br />

6. The Learning Needs Program and the partnership with students,<br />

parents, and teachers is a valuable resource in support of student<br />

academic success.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Professional development documents<br />

· Parent information evening agendas<br />

· Learning Needs documents<br />

· Course catalog<br />

· Learning Needs binder<br />

· Position descriptions<br />

· Faculty handbook<br />

· Academic and Executive Council minutes<br />

· Campus Ministry Summer Curriculum Grant<br />

· Service Learning program strategic plan<br />

· Technology Plan<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Evaluate and promote the expansion of the Campus Ministry program,<br />

including the new Service Learning Program.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

41


Rationale: Systematic evaluation of new programs results in effective<br />

program administration and organization that benefits all<br />

constituencies.<br />

2. Address the overall student and staff connectedness to the Catholic<br />

identity of the school.<br />

Rationale: Student and faculty surveys, as well as student<br />

demographics (54% Catholic), indicate a need to review<br />

connectedness to the Catholic identity.<br />

3. Develop strategies for a more consistent teacher evaluation program.<br />

Rationale: Evaluations empower and provide direction to the faculty<br />

in identifying areas of strength and growth.<br />

4. Develop effective strategies for analysis and synthesis of data in order<br />

to promote shared accountability for student learning.<br />

Rationale: There is no system in place to assure effective<br />

implementation of research­based assessment strategies (e.g.<br />

horizontal alignment of curriculum and assessment).<br />

“It [the Peer Teacher Mentoring Program] provides a venue and vehicle<br />

for intellectual exchange on a regular basis since<br />

both parties are held accountable to meeting with each other<br />

and meeting certain milestones throughout the school year.<br />

That is, because of the frequency of these informal meetings,<br />

there seems to be a certainty of growth that is not experienced<br />

in the large faculty meeting gatherings or<br />

the department meetings.”<br />

­ Faculty Member<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

42


A4. Staff<br />

To what extent are the school administration and staff qualified for<br />

their assigned responsibilities? To what extent are the school<br />

administration and staff committed to the school’s Philosophy and<br />

Mission? To what extent does the school administration and staff<br />

engage in on­going spiritual and professional development that<br />

promotes student learning? To what extent do the administration<br />

and staff lead by example and work to create a community of faith?<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> remains committed to hiring and retaining<br />

highly qualified administrators, teachers, and support personnel. A<br />

rigorous recruitment and hiring practice ensures highly qualified and<br />

competent staff. The majority of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd faculty members hold<br />

baccalaureate and credentials relevant to their subject area. Most faculty<br />

members have earned graduate degrees or are in process of earning an<br />

advanced degree in their field. Furthermore, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd seeks to<br />

ensure that staff members are assigned positions and responsibilities<br />

matching their educational backgrounds and professional expertise. Major<br />

administrative hiring decisions involve search/interview committees<br />

representing major stakeholders. Qualifications for administrators include<br />

experience, graduate education, and on­going professional development.<br />

Significant professional growth resources for advancing degrees are<br />

available to all faculty members. Consequently, five teachers pursued their<br />

teaching credential in the 2006­07 school year and several continue work<br />

on advanced degrees.<br />

The Mission and Philosophy statements are integral to the work of the<br />

school and permeate every aspect of campus life. Faculty, staff, parent,<br />

and student representatives collaborated on the revision of the Mission<br />

and Philosophy and the development of the ESLRs. The 2006 faculty<br />

surveys indicate that 85% of the faculty members agree with the<br />

statement “I understand and support the Mission and Philosophy of the<br />

school.” The administration supports the professional and spiritual growth<br />

of all employees. According to the Faculty Survey, 88% believe the school<br />

administration supports the professional development of faculty through<br />

allocation of release time and resources. Ninety­one percent indicate that<br />

there is sufficient support and encouragement for their academic growth.<br />

The administration is committed to providing additional faculty growth<br />

opportunities to foster ownership of the newly revised Mission and<br />

Philosophy.<br />

Facilitating the design and revision of the Mission and Philosophy, the<br />

Board, administration, and staff continue to demonstrate their commitment<br />

to the Mission and Philosophy of the school. Faculty, staff, student, and<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

43


parent representatives played an integral role in the selection of the<br />

ESLRs and the approval of the Mission and Philosophy. In addition,<br />

discerning support for and willingness to promote the Mission and ESLRs<br />

are integral to the hiring process.<br />

To achieve the school’s Mission, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd administrators monitor<br />

the faculty’s pursuit of excellence in all dimensions of school service. The<br />

courses offered through the Professional Development Program seek to<br />

promote student achievement of the ESLRs. The school collaborates<br />

extensively with other schools to share resources and expertise in order to<br />

offer a wider variety of course offerings.<br />

The hiring of a full­time Director of Instructional Technology and a parttime<br />

assistant provides opportunity for on­going and consistent<br />

professional development further demonstrating the administration’s<br />

commitment to professional growth. The technology team prepares<br />

teachers in effectively leveraging digital technology, integrating innovative<br />

software, and implementing effective course management systems.<br />

Additionally, the school provides all faculty members with personal laptops<br />

and installed LCD projectors in classrooms for enhanced instructional<br />

productivity. There is need for on­going training of all professional and<br />

support staff in the use of current and planned software and digital<br />

hardware.<br />

Faculty members further support the ESLRs by providing leadership for<br />

extracurricular activities such as athletic coaching, Mock Trial, Amnesty<br />

International, Key Club, Black Student Union, Asian Student Alliance, and<br />

other cultural clubs. They serve as retreat and immersion leaders,<br />

accompany students on service learning projects and environmental<br />

service projects, and direct and coach students in a variety of off­campus<br />

drama and music performances.<br />

The administration encourages the development of a community of faith.<br />

The school year begins with a faculty/staff retreat providing valuable time<br />

for spiritual renewal and community building. The staff and administration<br />

attend school­wide and grade­level liturgies, faith sharing opportunities,<br />

and student retreats. Each morning, school begins with prayer lead by a<br />

staff member, administrator, or students from various faith backgrounds.<br />

The newly reorganized Campus Ministry Program provides weekly Mass,<br />

prayer opportunities, and a Lenten series, all of which offer members of<br />

the broader community ways to practice and share spiritual disciplines.<br />

Few faculty and staff attend. Last year, the Campus Ministry Program<br />

launched a modest but growing Adult Spirituality Program. There is need<br />

to evaluate and expand this new program in order to better support faculty<br />

modeling of the spiritual and religious values expressed in the ESLRs.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

44


Areas of Strength<br />

1. The administration fully supports a well­developed professional growth<br />

program and extensive collaboration with other Bay Area high schools.<br />

2. The administration supports the professional growth of faculty and staff<br />

through the laptop program and the new Director of Instructional<br />

Technology.<br />

3. State­of­the art software and course management systems such as<br />

Power<strong>School</strong>® and Blackboard® promote student learning.<br />

Evidence<br />

· <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Faculty/Staff Survey<br />

· Campus Ministry materials<br />

· Club rosters<br />

· Club minute notebooks<br />

· Faculty Handbook, pay scale, and faculty meeting agendas<br />

· Parent Association documentation<br />

· BOD website<br />

· The Dragon Fall 2005 and 2006<br />

· ESLRs<br />

· Mission Statement<br />

· Dragon Parent Aug/Sept 2005<br />

· Faculty/Staff Excel Chart 2006 – 2007<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Gather and evaluate data on the degree to which each faculty<br />

member, administrator, and staff member is qualified and trained for<br />

his or her positions. Act to ensure that all <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd employees<br />

have the training required for high­level job performance.<br />

Rationale: There is insufficient reliable data in this area and no<br />

consistent requirement for administrators, faculty, and staff to update<br />

skills.<br />

2. Gather evidence regarding spiritual needs of faculty and staff.<br />

Rationale: Faculty and staff have expressed a desire for more<br />

support in the area of personal spiritual growth.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

45


A5. <strong>School</strong> Environment<br />

To what extent does the school have a safe, healthy, nurturing<br />

environment that reflects the school’s Mission and Philosophy? To<br />

what extent does the school environment foster community and the<br />

achievement of religious and educational goals? To what extent is<br />

the school environment characterized by a respect for differences,<br />

trust, caring, professionalism, support, and high expectations for<br />

each student?<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> strives to provide a safe, healthy, and<br />

nurturing environment reflective of the school’s Mission. Students and<br />

parents are expected to read and abide by policies and procedures as<br />

stated in the Student Parent Handbook, delineating clear school policies<br />

pertaining to responsible student behavior including drugs, alcohol,<br />

cheating, electronic devices, and liability. Emergency cards, fire drill, and<br />

earthquake procedures are reviewed and updated annually. Faculty<br />

members are trained annually in emergency procedures. Emergency<br />

evacuation instructions and first aid kits are present in every room.<br />

In an attempt to maintain the personal safety of each student, the school<br />

adheres to requirements set by the Diocese of Oakland’s Safe<br />

Environment for Children Project precautions. Faculty and staff undergo<br />

yearly safe environment training and workshops through the Shield the<br />

Vulnerable initiative.<br />

In order to help maintain student health, the school offers teen education<br />

programs for both students and parents. A course entitled Christian<br />

Sexuality provides education and moral instruction on sexuality. Tenth<br />

grade physical education classes provide drug awareness and health<br />

education. Each fall, the Parent Association, in partnership with the<br />

school, offer four Teen Challenge nights, providing timely information for<br />

parents concerning student wellness topics. Parents must attend one of<br />

these nights in order for their student to attend dances, activities, and<br />

participate in sports. The sessions seek to equip parents with the skills<br />

and information necessary to speak with their teenagers about drugs,<br />

alcohol use, and dating activities.<br />

In spring 2006, the school participated in Every 15 Minutes, a two­day<br />

program that re­enacts a realistic dramatization of a drunk driving<br />

accident. Student participation in this activity encouraged serious<br />

reflection on the dangers of drinking and driving. Ninety­five percent of<br />

parents surveyed felt the school provides effective education programs for<br />

parents and teens on teen issues of drugs, alcohol, smoking, teen<br />

sexuality, and depression.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

46


The school makes an effort to provide a healthy and nurturing<br />

environment; however, the most recent student survey indicates that many<br />

students feel that this environment is not adequate. According to the<br />

student survey, only 61% of students feel that teachers are approachable<br />

and care about them as a person, 63% of teachers treat students with<br />

respect and provide help when possible, and 68% state, “…my counselors<br />

show concern and care for me as a person by treating my questions and<br />

problems with respect.” Sixty­one percent of students state that teachers<br />

and coaches are role models of Catholic values. There is a need to study<br />

this issue to ensure that students will experience care, respect, and<br />

concern from every teacher, counselor, and staff person.<br />

The school is working to develop a sense of community. According to the<br />

<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> surveys, 92% of faculty members feel <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd is a<br />

good place to work, 94% of parents state the school makes all students<br />

feel a welcome part of the community, but 73% of students feel it is a<br />

place where they are respected and belong. There is need to further study<br />

why 27% of students feel that they are not fully respected and do not<br />

belong to the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> Community.<br />

A charism is a gift from God bestowed on one or several people as a<br />

manifestation of deep and enduring Catholic and human values. <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> does not possess a defined religious charism. In the<br />

absence of a defined charism, the faculty, staff, and administration<br />

struggle to find a common foundation on which to build community.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> needs to discern and name a specific<br />

Catholic charism to help support its identity as a Catholic high<br />

school. Many successful Catholic high schools rely on the charism of their<br />

founding orders to help articulate the school’s identity. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s<br />

charism has its roots in Catholic traditions, but the community is lacking<br />

clearly shared traditions that articulate or name parts of its Catholic<br />

heritage.<br />

In the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> survey, 85% of faculty state they support<br />

opportunities for spiritual formation for students and colleagues. The<br />

Campus Ministry Program offers spiritual support to students and faculty<br />

through the Service Learning Program, retreats, liturgies, morning prayer<br />

services, charity drives, national and international immersion experiences,<br />

adult spirituality activities, and Campus Ministry Teams.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> fosters achievement of educational goals for<br />

all students. The Learning Needs Program supports students who have<br />

documented learning disabilities. The Director of Learning Needs<br />

provides all teachers with information and training regarding learning<br />

needs students and the appropriate accommodations. Additionally, the<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

47


Dragon Success Program, Academic Support Center, and Peer<br />

Homework Support Program provide before, during, and after school<br />

tutoring to promote academic success for all students. A variety of honors<br />

and AP classes offer students a challenging course of study. The vast<br />

majority of students surpass the minimum graduation requirements of<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd Philosophy states, “<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd challenges and<br />

encourages all members of its community to be loving and rejoice in our<br />

diversity.” In the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> survey, 73% of students state that the<br />

school is a good example of a diverse learning community. Ninety­three<br />

percent of parents state that the school respects diversity and makes<br />

students feel part of the community. Ninety­five percent of teachers<br />

welcome the opportunity to teach to a diverse group of students. Respect<br />

for diversity is encouraged through liturgy and prayer, cultural events, and<br />

activities during Multi­cultural week. Faculty model an appreciation for<br />

cultural identity by sponsoring and facilitating a diverse mix of cultural and<br />

ethnic clubs.<br />

The administration encourages a high level of professionalism on the part<br />

of the faculty and staff. Seventy­seven percent of teachers believe the<br />

administration holds faculty and staff to high standards of job<br />

performance. Professional standards for faculty and staff include returning<br />

phone calls and emails within 48 hours, publishing comprehensive syllabi<br />

and grading scales, updating grades every two weeks, and providing<br />

additional information for every grade below a C­. There are minimum<br />

technology requirements for all teachers based on the National<br />

Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS). Teachers are<br />

required to use the Blackboard® Course Information System, the school<br />

email system, Power<strong>School</strong>® for online grading and attendance, Microsoft<br />

Word, incorporate technology into their class design and instruction, and<br />

continually update their technological skills.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. The school is committed to a growing parent education program for<br />

teen wellness including Teen Challenge.<br />

2. The Learning Needs Program, Dragon Success Program, Academic<br />

Support Center, and Peer Homework Support Program foster the<br />

academic success of all students.<br />

3. The Campus Ministry Program offers spiritual support to students and<br />

faculty.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

48


4. Respect for diversity is encouraged and supports the core values of<br />

the school.<br />

5. Students and parents read and abide by policies and procedures as<br />

stated in the Student­Parent Handbook, which contains clear school<br />

policies pertaining to responsible student behavior.<br />

6. The school maintains high academic and spiritual expectations for all<br />

students.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Parent­student handbook<br />

· Parent notification system<br />

· Dean’s policy<br />

· Diocese of Oakland website<br />

· Shield the Vulnerable website<br />

· PE department files: “Families are Forever”<br />

· Teen Challenge documentation<br />

· Every 15 Minutes program and parent/faculty responses<br />

· <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Faculty, Parent, and Student Surveys<br />

· Counseling Department documentation<br />

· Cookies, Cocoa, and Cram data<br />

· Learning Needs Program documentation<br />

· Food and Toy Drive, Dollar Day, Mission Drives<br />

· Service Learning Program<br />

· Campus Ministry Description<br />

· Study Hall Description in Course Catalog<br />

· Power<strong>School</strong> documentation<br />

· On­going relationship with the Oakland Police and Fire<br />

Departments<br />

· Updated earthquake and emergency plan<br />

· 24­hour on­campus security.<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Develop policies and programs to inculcate the newly designed ESLRs<br />

and Mission into the curricular and co­curricular life of the school.<br />

Rationale: The new ESLRs require an action plan.<br />

2. Identify, learn, and promote a charism that better articulates and<br />

makes memorable the core values represented in the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong><br />

Mission and ESLRs.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

49


Rationale: The school has no defined charism forming the foundation<br />

of our community.<br />

3. Evaluate students’ perception that teachers and counselors are not<br />

approachable and do not sufficiently care about them as persons.<br />

Implement appropriate measures to address this perception.<br />

Rationale: Care and respect are core values in the school Mission. It<br />

is essential that the school community have accurate information about<br />

this issue and act to correct any violations of its Mission.<br />

“The three greatest strengths are the school’s acceptance and<br />

encouragement of all students in such a diverse population,<br />

its nurturing of the morals and values within the students<br />

to grow them into successful young adults, and the amazing, consistent<br />

and wisely chosen plays that the school performs.<br />

We haven’t missed a one in 8 years.”<br />

– Parent Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

50


A6. Reporting Student Progress<br />

To what extent does the school administration and staff regularly<br />

assess student progress toward accomplishing the school’s ESLRs?<br />

To what extent does the school administration and staff report<br />

student progress to the rest of the school community?<br />

The <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd ESLRs begin with this statement, “Guided by the<br />

Mission of the school to prepare students for lives of spiritual, intellectual,<br />

and personal growth, graduates will be academic achievers, spiritual<br />

individuals, effective communicators, active leaders, responsible global<br />

citizens, and life­long learners.” <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> regularly<br />

assesses student progress toward achievement of the ESLRs in a variety<br />

of ways.<br />

Faculty members regularly assess student academic achievement through<br />

formal and informal assessment. Quizzes, tests, projects, cooperative<br />

activities, discussion boards, standardized tests, and classroom<br />

discussions are used to assess students’ growth. Counselors assess<br />

academic achievement through analysis of grade point averages,<br />

standardized tests, and individual discussions with students.<br />

Administration reviews standardized test scores, AP scores, and<br />

comparative analysis of data. The administration, through formal and<br />

informal means, communicates regularly with students, parents, teachers,<br />

counselors, and coaches in order to facilitate student achievement of the<br />

ESLRs.<br />

To prepare students as spiritual individuals, moral, ethical, and faith<br />

development are incorporated into curricular and extra­curricular activities.<br />

Spiritual growth is evidenced through journals, reflections, research<br />

projects, and classroom activities focused on Catholic social teachings.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd seeks to promote student leadership through leadership<br />

roles in student government, Campus Ministry, athletics, drama, in<br />

classrooms, and through the Dragon Ambassador program. Campus<br />

Ministry regularly incorporates leadership training and experiences into the<br />

retreat programs. Student assessment of liturgies and prayer services<br />

serve as an evaluative tool to improve faith experience for the community.<br />

Development and expansion of programs to support this ESLR are<br />

needed to prepare students to take their role as active leaders.<br />

World language courses, Christian Morality, and AP Environmental<br />

Science, alert students to the need to be globally responsible citizens.<br />

Class activities, journals, quizzes, and tests are evidence of student<br />

achievement of this ESLR. Participation in immersion programs and<br />

service learning introduces students to concerns of social justice, cultural<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

51


diversity, and human suffering. Additional assessment and reporting is<br />

needed to accurately assess student achievement of this goal.<br />

The service learning and retreat programs, ASB leadership camp, Junior<br />

Statesmen of America, Mock Trial, and various campus organizations<br />

promote life­long learning. Student engagement in these programs<br />

demonstrates their commitment to life­long learning.<br />

While many of the goal outcomes of the ESLRs are indirectly assessed in<br />

the academic life of the school, there is need for conscious,<br />

comprehensive, and systematic appraisal of student achievement of the<br />

ESLRs.<br />

The administration and staff of the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> community regularly<br />

report student achievement to the broader school community. The<br />

reporting of student progress takes a variety of forms such as report<br />

cards, progress reports, <strong>School</strong> Profile, emails, e­News updates, the<br />

school website, the Dragon Parent, Dragon magazine, PowerGrade®,<br />

parent conference evenings, and informal parent conferences. Honor Roll<br />

lists and various academic award plaques are publicly displayed. Formal<br />

and informal articulation with support school principals and eighth grade<br />

teachers occurs on a regular basis.<br />

In fall 2006, the school adopted Power<strong>School</strong>® as an on­line grade<br />

reporting system. Power<strong>School</strong>® enables parents, students, teachers,<br />

counselors, coaches, and administrators "real time" access to student<br />

grades and attendance.<br />

The school recognizes academic honors during academic assemblies, at<br />

commencement, and on the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> website. Each of these<br />

venues provides a unique means for the school to celebrate and support<br />

students and to honor their successes.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. Faculty members assess student academic achievement through<br />

formal and informal assessment.<br />

2. Spiritual growth is evidenced through journals, reflections, research<br />

projects, and classroom activities focused on Catholic social<br />

teachings.<br />

3. Student leadership and life­long learning is promoted through a<br />

variety of curricular and co­curricular activities.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

52


4. Student achievement is regularly reported to the broader school<br />

community by the administration and staff of the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Power<strong>School</strong>®<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> Website<br />

· ESLRs<br />

· The Dragon<br />

· Dragon Parent<br />

· Progress reports and report cards<br />

· Power<strong>School</strong>® usage reports<br />

· e­News<br />

· <strong>School</strong> profile<br />

· English department portfolios<br />

· Immersion program reflections<br />

· Commencement program<br />

· Articulation meetings<br />

Area of Growth<br />

1. Develop tools to assess achievement of the new ESLRs.<br />

Rationale: Frequent and clear assessment of student<br />

achievement of the ESLRs will ensure integration throughout the<br />

life of the school community.<br />

“…teachers are prepared for class and when I need help,<br />

they find a time that would work for both of us.”<br />

– Student Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

53


A7. <strong>School</strong> Improvement Process<br />

To what extent does the school leadership facilitate school<br />

improvement which is driven by plans of action that embody faith<br />

formation and enhance quality learning for all students? To what<br />

extent does the school leadership have school community support<br />

and involvement? To what extent does the school leadership<br />

effectively guide the work of the school? To what extent does the<br />

school leadership provide for accountability through monitoring of<br />

the school­wide action plan?<br />

The leadership of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is fully committed to the<br />

school improvement process as evidenced by significant restructuring of<br />

the governance, Mission, Philosophy, ESLRs, and the on­going<br />

development of a Strategic Plan. The President and Principal, in concert<br />

with the current Board of Regents, implemented necessary changes and<br />

plans that sufficiently address the Mission and needs of the school over<br />

the coming years.<br />

<strong>School</strong> improvements completed over the past two years reflected the<br />

recommendations proposed in the Catholic <strong>School</strong> Management (CSM)<br />

Assessment Report (fall 2004). The administration addressed all 70 of the<br />

CSM report recommendations by fall 2006, including the following:<br />

· Increasing the Board of Regents’ authority and responsibility by<br />

revising it into a Board of Limited Jurisdiction<br />

· Adopting the President/Principal model of governance<br />

· Improving financial oversight and the budgeting process<br />

· Addition of the Office of Advancement<br />

· Restructuring and additional staffing for the following departments:<br />

Campus Ministry, Service Learning, Technology, Counseling,<br />

Athletics, Admissions, and Security<br />

· Restructuring and additional staffing for school administration<br />

· Formalization of teacher evaluation<br />

· Review, revision, and restructure of job descriptions<br />

· Reemphasis on faculty professional development with appropriate<br />

funding and incentives<br />

· Creation of Learning Needs Program<br />

· Improved communication amongst all constituencies<br />

· Continuous evaluation of existing and planned curriculum offerings<br />

· Initiation of a formal strategic planning process<br />

Parents support the general direction of the school, as evidenced by<br />

parental survey responses stating that 95% agree with the statement,<br />

“The mission statement accurately characterizes <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>.” Eighty­six percent agree with the statement, “If I had to do it<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

54


again, I would enthusiastically send my child to <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd.” Eightysix<br />

percent of teachers are pleased with the direction in which the school<br />

is heading. It is apparent that the school’s leadership has effectively<br />

utilized its evaluation tools, made relevant decisions, and provided<br />

guidance to make improvements that enhance student learning and faith<br />

formation.<br />

The school leadership regularly communicates regarding the progress of<br />

the school. Both the Executive Council and Directors’ Councils meet bimonthly<br />

and minutes of those meetings are distributed to the entire faculty<br />

on a regular basis. Parents and alumni are informed of projects and plans<br />

through the weekly e­News update, the monthly Dragon Parent<br />

newsletter, and the quarterly Dragon alumni magazine. Officers of the<br />

parent organizations meet on a monthly basis to share information with<br />

the President and Principal. Students are kept aware of major school<br />

issues through daily announcements, homeroom, school website, the<br />

school newspaper, and bi­annual class meetings. All of these methods<br />

keep the lines of communication open to the various constituencies of the<br />

school.<br />

<strong>School</strong> leadership effectively and precisely guides the work of the school.<br />

Policy and practice issues are executed openly and communicated<br />

effectively after input is gathered by the administration from its various<br />

resources – most notably the faculty, staff, Board of Regents, Directors,<br />

and Executive Councils. The leadership of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd is dedicated to<br />

school improvement as identified by the strategic planning process as well<br />

as <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Self­Study and recent CSM evaluation.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. The school completed all 70 recommendations from the CSM<br />

evaluation report.<br />

2. The school involved all major stakeholders in the school improvement<br />

process.<br />

Evidence<br />

· CSM Report<br />

· Minutes from Board of Regents, Executive Council, Directors’<br />

Council, and Academic Council meetings<br />

· Leadership Team notes<br />

· Strategic Planning documents<br />

· Dragon Parent<br />

· Dragon<br />

· E­News<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

55


· <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> surveys<br />

· President and Principal evaluations<br />

Area for Growth<br />

1. Continued follow­up and evaluation of Action Plan<br />

Rationale: The Action Plan is a living document that will need to be<br />

monitored and updated to ensure its full implementation.<br />

“Our daughter chose O’Dowd because she wanted<br />

to experience more diversity in her school setting.<br />

She has been enlightened by the ethnic, economic,<br />

religious, and social diversity surrounding her everyday.”<br />

– Parent Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

56


B1. What Students Learn<br />

Category B: Curriculum & Instruction<br />

To what extent does the school provide a challenging,<br />

comprehensive and relevant curriculum for each student that fulfills<br />

the philosophy and mission of the school, strengthens Catholic<br />

identity and results in student achievement of the expected schoolwide<br />

learning results through successful completion of any course<br />

of study offered?<br />

The school provides a challenging, comprehensive, and relevant<br />

curriculum for each student that fulfills the school’s Mission and<br />

Philosophy, strengthens Catholic identity, and results in student<br />

achievement of the expected school­wide learning results. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

is a Catholic co­educational, college preparatory high school, administered<br />

by the Diocese of Oakland. It seeks to affirm the teachings, moral values,<br />

and ethical standards of the Catholic Church. This unique and diverse<br />

community strives to develop young men and women of competence,<br />

conscience, and compassion through an integrated academic, spiritual,<br />

and extra­curricular program. Guided by the Mission of the school, <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd has chosen a set of outcomes to prepare graduates who will be<br />

academic achievers, spiritual individuals, effective communicators, active<br />

leaders, globally responsible citizens, and life­long learners (ESLRs I, II,<br />

III, IV, V, VI).<br />

The academic program at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd challenges students with a<br />

college preparatory curriculum that exceeds the standards of the<br />

University of California. According to the data for the 2005­2006 academic<br />

year, 94% of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd seniors enrolled in a fourth year of<br />

mathematics and 88% enrolled in a third year of science when UC<br />

requirements mandate only three and two years respectively. Fifty­one<br />

percent of graduating seniors studied beyond the UC requirement of two<br />

years of world language, with 37% of those taking a fourth year.<br />

Additionally, students who enroll in the honors program challenge<br />

themselves beyond a regular college preparatory curriculum. During 2005­<br />

06, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd offered 28 honors courses, 15 of which were AP<br />

courses.<br />

Standardized test scores and college matriculation data further<br />

demonstrate that <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd provides a challenging curriculum. In<br />

2007, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd administered 498 AP exams achieving an overall<br />

pass rate of 60%. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd students continue to surpass both state<br />

and national averages on standardized tests (SAT, PSAT, SAT II). On<br />

average, student SAT scores (combined verbal and math) have exceeded<br />

the national average by approximately 148 points. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

57


successfully prepares its graduates for college study. Ninety­two percent<br />

of the 2006 graduating class attended four­year colleges. The majority of<br />

the remaining graduates attended two­year institutions, bringing the<br />

overall matriculation rate to 98%. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd graduates attend a<br />

variety of institutions including Ivy League and pre­eminent West coast<br />

schools, such as Stanford and UC Berkeley. In 2006, 27% the graduates<br />

attended UC schools, 34% Catholic and private universities, and 30%<br />

attended Cal State schools.<br />

Information gathered from the 2006­07 Alumni Survey (144 respondents)<br />

demonstrates satisfaction among alumni with their BOD education and<br />

confirms that graduates feel prepared for the rigors of a college<br />

curriculum. Eighty­four percent of the Alumni respondents strongly agreed<br />

or agreed with the statement, “My <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> education prepared me<br />

to excel in my college coursework.” There was mixed reaction however in<br />

the Alumni Survey to the statement, “Overall, <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> helped me<br />

become a person of influence who is loving, open to growth, spiritual,<br />

intellectually competent, and a skilled leader committed to justice and<br />

peace”, (taken from the school’s Mission) with 76% affirming that they<br />

strongly agreed or agreed with the statement on Mission effectiveness.<br />

Teachers at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd work collaboratively toward designing a<br />

coherent and sequential curriculum in conjunction with national and state<br />

standards, the school’s Mission, and ESLRs. Efforts to communicate<br />

curricular outcomes and to design curriculum for students to achieve these<br />

stated outcomes continue to expand. However, information gathered from<br />

the 2006 Student Survey (1,039 respondents) indicates mixed satisfaction<br />

among students regarding clear course expectations with 71% of student<br />

respondents strongly agreeing or agreeing with the statement, “My<br />

teachers effectively communicate their course expectations and grading<br />

system to me.” In addition, information gathered from the 2006 Faculty<br />

Survey demonstrates that only 36% of faculty agree or strongly agree with<br />

the statement, “Students understand the <strong>School</strong>’s ESLRs.” An enhanced<br />

effort in clearly communicating curriculum expectations and school ESLRs<br />

is critical to improving school­wide student outcomes.<br />

The 2006 Student Survey asked students to rank the effectiveness of the<br />

academic departments at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd with 1 indicating that they<br />

strongly disagree with the effectiveness of the program and 5 strongly<br />

agreeing with the effectiveness. Results indicate a general satisfaction<br />

with departments with an average of 84% strongly agreeing or agreeing<br />

with the effectiveness of the departments.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

58


Department 1 Strongly disagree 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree<br />

English 0% 5% 9% 32% 54%<br />

Foreign Language 2% 6% 11% 31% 50%<br />

Social Studies 1% 1% 6% 28% 64%<br />

Mathematics 2% 4% 7% 31% 56%<br />

Physical Education 2% 2% 9% 27% 60%<br />

Religions Studies 1% 3% 10% 31% 55%<br />

Science 0% 1% 10% 35% 54%<br />

Technology 0% 5% 11% 33% 51%<br />

Visual Fine Arts 0% 2% 11% 26% 60%<br />

Music 2% 9% 17% 31% 41%<br />

The Academic Council — comprised of all department chairs, Assistant<br />

Principal for Academics, Principal, Director of Counseling, Director of<br />

Learning Needs , Director of Curriculum and Instruction, Director of<br />

Instructional Technology, two student representatives, and one parent<br />

representative — oversees the program of study. The Academic Council,<br />

as well as each department, meets monthly to discuss curricular and other<br />

academic issues. Evaluation of the entire academic program is an ongoing<br />

process.<br />

The curricular program at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd reflects the changing issues and<br />

needs of students and the community at large. For example, 18% of<br />

freshmen enrolled in Freshmen Reading, a remedial course designed to<br />

bring students up to grade level. Additionally, 14% of students enrolled in<br />

Algebra 1a and Algebra 1b, a modified two­year algebra course. Students<br />

identified as needing to enroll in Freshmen Reading and Algebra 1a and<br />

1b are required to attend summer school the summer prior to attending<br />

the ninth grade. Italian was added to the World Languages Department in<br />

fall 2005 in response to family requests. Honors Italian III was added to<br />

the course curriculum for the 2007­08 academic year. Journalism was<br />

added in 2005 in response to the need for a more comprehensive and indepth<br />

newspaper and yearbook course. The academic excellence of the<br />

journalism class was nationally recognized with numerous awards.<br />

Moreover, several revisions to the Science Department have resulted in a<br />

one­semester science foundations course entitled Connections: Freshmen<br />

Science Foundations as well as Biology for qualified entering freshmen,<br />

determined by HSPT composite scores. The AP Biology course moved<br />

from sophomore year to junior year.<br />

In the past two years, additional new courses have been added based on<br />

student interest and need including: Painting II, Instrumental Ensemble,<br />

Producing the Play, Computer Art II, Honors English 9, Theater Design<br />

and Production, AP Psychology, History of the Middle East, and AP<br />

Statistics. A new computer Technology Team course was added in 2006<br />

in order to provide authentic learning experiences for students interested<br />

in practical applications for technology.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

59


A wide variety of courses requires the application of acquired classroom<br />

knowledge to real­life situations. Last year, the Science Department took<br />

students to the Galapagos and Costa Rica, where students engaged in<br />

extensive field research. The Science Department is cultivating a<br />

partnership with the Oakland Zoo and curriculum planning with the zoo is<br />

an area of growth. Some courses and clubs also introduce “real­world”<br />

learning such as the stock market simulation, Yosemite Program, the<br />

Close­up Program in Washington D.C., the Living Lab, Mock Trial, and the<br />

Junior Statesmen of America Program. Moreover, coordinated student<br />

activities reflect the school’s ESLRs including Multicultural week, Mission<br />

Drive week, Catholic <strong>School</strong>s Week, and Spirit week.<br />

Some classroom activities reflect cross­disciplinary collaboration and<br />

instruction. Several faculty members have initiated interdisciplinary<br />

curriculum development with measured success. For example, in the<br />

recently instituted One Book, One Community Program, all students,<br />

teachers, and staff read the same book over the summer. Various<br />

departments implemented cross­curricular activities focusing on the<br />

book’s themes. The English Department encourages students to opt for<br />

non­literary topics when writing their junior term papers; this flexibility in<br />

choosing a topic of research often leads students to explore crosscurricular<br />

topics. The positive results of these interdisciplinary activities<br />

support the need to commit resources to develop interdisciplinary<br />

programs across the curriculum.<br />

An analysis of performance data in various departments has led to a<br />

redefinition of student learning needs and to a revision of departmental<br />

practices. For example, diminishing numbers of students in upper division<br />

World Languages as well as a decreased pass rate for World Languages<br />

AP scores, led the department to review curriculum alignment and<br />

instructional and assessment strategies. The World Languages<br />

Department is presently reviewing its assessment strategies to design<br />

tools to measure student progress. Analysis of performance data in all<br />

departments leading to a redefinition of student learning needs and a<br />

revision of the departmental practices is an area of growth.<br />

Additionally, all academic departments need to implement a strategy for<br />

analysis of overall existing courses and programs. For example, the music<br />

program at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> maintains several instrumental<br />

groups, but student and parent interviews indicate that the program needs<br />

additional resources in order to provide a truly exceptional and competitive<br />

music program including instrumental support (e.g. artists in residence),<br />

dance program, and enhanced choral and vocal ensemble. Systemic<br />

evaluation of program efficacy and student need is critical in consistently<br />

evaluating data on student achievement and in determining program goals<br />

and outcomes.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

60


The spiritual growth and social consciousness of each student are<br />

institutional commitments that stand at the core of the school Mission, are<br />

central to the curriculum, and are encouraged through community service,<br />

religious celebrations, and daily prayers. Students may choose to join over<br />

50 clubs, engage in fine and performing arts, participate in athletic<br />

activities, and take part in other opportunities for social, spiritual, physical,<br />

and intellectual development. In addition to the core academic curriculum<br />

in Religious Studies, all students are required to perform community<br />

service each year through the Service Learning Program introduced in<br />

2006. Service is centered on the exercise of social justice linked to<br />

Christian social teachings with clear curricular outcomes: the freshmen<br />

class focuses on elders in society through the Hebrew Scriptures course,<br />

sophomores focus on children through the Catholic Experience course,<br />

and junior and senior classes examine societal marginalization in their<br />

course entitled Christian Morality. In spring 2006, every faculty and staff<br />

member spent a day volunteering in the community performing service<br />

committed to social justice. This faculty commitment to the Service<br />

Learning program continues to serve as a model of Christian service to<br />

students within the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd community.<br />

The Religious Studies Department offers courses with the intent of<br />

awakening in students the call to be agents of social justice. Numerous<br />

electives such as Bio­Ethics, Living and Dying, Ethics and Media, and Bay<br />

Area Social Concerns serve as examples of these opportunities. Retreats<br />

and all­school liturgies complement the theology courses and service<br />

experiences. Gospel values highlight departmental curricula providing<br />

support for Catholic traditions and beliefs as well as demonstrating respect<br />

for the teachings of other religions. There is a need to evaluate and<br />

promote the teaching of Catholic values and perspectives across the<br />

curricular and co­curricular programs.<br />

Faculty at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd regularly update their knowledge of curriculum<br />

and teaching methodologies to create a challenging, coherent, and<br />

relevant curriculum. The administration strongly encourages faculty at<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd to seek professional development opportunities. Funds,<br />

made available through the Professional Development budget and NCLB<br />

funds (2006­07 budget exceeded $200,000), cover the cost of the majority<br />

of these activities. Faculty members are involved in various opportunities<br />

ranging from attending weekend workshops to completing advanced<br />

degrees. These professional development activities provide faculty with an<br />

opportunity to expand their knowledge base and reflect on their practice.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd sponsors annual summer workshops including such<br />

courses as Studying Skillful Teaching, Observing and Analyzing Teaching,<br />

Analyzing the Role of the Department Chair, Technology Integration,<br />

Understanding By Design, Peer Mentoring, and Cooperative Learning.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

61


Students directly benefit from such professional development<br />

opportunities because teachers are able to challenge their students with a<br />

comprehensive, rigorous, and relevant curriculum. For example, the<br />

Summer Curriculum Grant Program offers teachers opportunity to develop<br />

curriculum and improve learning during the summer. Specifically, the<br />

Summer Curriculum Grant Program funds projects such as the planning of<br />

a new course, revision of a course with new technology, developing new<br />

assessment strategies, or creating innovative classroom activities. In an<br />

effort to improve course curriculum and student learning, these<br />

collaborative endeavors enable teachers to examine and revise individual<br />

lesson plans, units, and courses.<br />

Summer Grant participants attend the Understanding by Design workshop<br />

targeted at assisting teachers in aligning curriculum and assessment with<br />

standards using the backward design methodology. Workshop participants<br />

learn how to design and gather assessment data and to use it effectively.<br />

Thirty teachers have participated in the 2006 and 2007 summer<br />

workshops. The annual budget for the Summer Curriculum Grant Program<br />

increased from $40,000 in 2006 to $50,000 in 2007. Effective curriculum<br />

design continues to be an area of growth for all faculty and curricular<br />

departments.<br />

In order to foster greater collaboration, the school leadership has initiated<br />

a Peer Mentoring Program to share ideas, to observe and coach new<br />

teachers and peers, and to encourage collegiality. Twelve teachers<br />

received training by nationally recognized experts in cognitive coaching<br />

during the program’s first year in 2007. Additional teams will join annually<br />

to enhance collegial support and innovation. Information gathered from the<br />

2006 Faculty Survey indicates that teachers see the need for additional<br />

evaluative support as only 61% of faculty strongly agree or agrees with the<br />

following statement, “Professional evaluation is utilized as a tool for<br />

fostering the professional growth of faculty, staff, and administration.”<br />

Continued opportunities for formal and informal cognitive coaching,<br />

collaboration, observation, and evaluation would be beneficial. The<br />

administration demonstrates its continued support by allocating resources<br />

for professional development and by the appointment in 2007 of a new<br />

Director of Curriculum and Instruction dedicated to faculty support and<br />

evaluation.<br />

Technology supports student learning. The restructuring of the <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd Tech Team in 2006 has assisted faculty and staff in effectively<br />

integrating technology into the curriculum. All faculty members received<br />

wireless­enabled laptops to help them in becoming more efficient and<br />

effective in planning, creating, and delivering technology­enhanced<br />

curricula. For example, the World Languages Department systematically<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

62


incorporated Rosetta Stone® software across the language curriculum.<br />

Teachers maintain a web presence through their own Blackboard®<br />

courses and all teachers are required to enter grades through<br />

Power<strong>School</strong>® and update grades every two weeks. Additionally, teachers<br />

recognize the need to teach students about the ethical and appropriate<br />

use of technology. Effective implementation of technology provides<br />

opportunity for faculty to communicate more effectively with both students<br />

and parents. There is a need to gather data on student technology literacy<br />

and implement a process to collect data on the effect of technology on<br />

student outcomes.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. The school provides a challenging, comprehensive, and relevant<br />

curriculum for each student that reflects the philosophy and fulfills the<br />

Mission, strengthens Catholic Identity, and results in student<br />

achievement of the ESLRs.<br />

2. The academic program at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd challenges students with a<br />

college preparatory curriculum that exceeds the standards of the<br />

University of California.<br />

3. Teachers at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd work collaboratively toward designing a<br />

coherent and sequential curriculum in conjunction with national and<br />

state standards, the school’s Mission, and ESLRs.<br />

4. In order to foster greater collaboration, school leadership initiated a<br />

Peer Mentoring Program to share ideas, observe and coach new<br />

teachers and peers, and encourage collegiality.<br />

5. The curricular program at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd reflects the changing issues<br />

and needs of students and the community at large.<br />

6. A wide variety of courses requires the application of acquired<br />

classroom knowledge to real­life situations.<br />

7. The spiritual growth and social consciousness of each student are an<br />

institutional commitment that stands at the core of the school Mission,<br />

is central to the curriculum, and is encouraged through community<br />

services, religious celebrations, and daily prayers at the school.<br />

8. The leadership at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> provides significant<br />

resources and opportunities for the faculty to update their knowledge of<br />

curriculum and teaching methodologies in order to create a<br />

challenging, coherent, and relevant curriculum.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

63


9. The new Service Learning Program has clear curricular outcomes and<br />

focuses on the exercise of social justice linked to Christian social<br />

teachings.<br />

10.The restructuring of the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd Tech Team has assisted<br />

faculty and staff in effectively integrating technology into all areas of<br />

the curriculum.<br />

11.Student activities reflect the school’s ESLRs including Multicultural<br />

Week, Mission Drive Week, Catholic <strong>School</strong>s Week, and Spirit Week.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Department handbooks with course descriptions and syllabi that<br />

reflect ESLRs<br />

· Statistics on matriculation<br />

· Statistics on student enrollment in courses beyond those required<br />

· Statistics on AP program<br />

· Student, faculty, parent, and alumni surveys<br />

· Counseling Department statistics<br />

· Home Group reports<br />

· Summer Curriculum Grants<br />

· Service Learning Program Description<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Evaluate and promote the teaching of Catholic values and<br />

perspectives across the curricular and co­curricular programs.<br />

Rationale: The teaching of Catholic values within curricular and cocurricular<br />

programs is a core value and integral in achieving the<br />

school’s Mission.<br />

2. Establish processes for more effective communication of curriculum<br />

expectations and school ESLRs critical to improving school­wide<br />

student outcomes.<br />

Rationale: Student surveys indicate that students do not fully<br />

understand their course expectations and school ESLRs. Student<br />

learning is compromised when learning outcomes are unclear.<br />

3. Commit additional resources to develop interdisciplinary programs and<br />

policies across the curriculum.<br />

Rationale: Cross­curricular programs provide a shared learning<br />

experience for students including course policies, outcomes, and<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

64


assessments. Student learning is more powerful when connections<br />

among various disciplines are clear. More interdisciplinary projects will<br />

allow for more effective student achievement of ESLRs.<br />

4. Develop successful curriculum design practices to address studentlearning<br />

needs based on performance data analysis.<br />

Rationale: Research supports the efficacy of data analysis in<br />

supporting student­learning outcomes. Consistent desegregation of<br />

data will help all departments revise curriculum in response to student<br />

achievement.<br />

5. Continue to build opportunities for formal and informal cognitive<br />

coaching, collaboration, observation, and evaluation both within and<br />

among departments.<br />

Rationale: Students directly benefit from on­going professional<br />

development of teachers.<br />

6. Gather data on student technology literacy and implement a process to<br />

collect data on the effect of technology on student outcomes.<br />

Rationale: Technology continues to play a critical role in the<br />

development and design of effective 21 st century curriculum. Data<br />

analysis of this technology­rich curriculum design contributes to<br />

successful implementation and a better understanding of its effect on<br />

student achievement.<br />

“We chose <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd because it seemed to be<br />

the most inclusive and truly diverse school in the east Bay.”<br />

– Parent Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

65


B2. Curriculum and Instruction criterion: How students learn<br />

To what extent does the professional staff use research­based<br />

knowledge about teaching and learning and design and implement a<br />

variety of learning experiences that actively engage students at a<br />

high level of learning consistent with the school philosophy and<br />

mission and the ESLRs?<br />

The professional staff at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> effectively and<br />

regularly uses research­based knowledge about teaching and learning to<br />

design and implement a variety of learning experiences. These enable<br />

students to learn at a high level, consistent with the school's goal of<br />

developing young men and women of competence, conscience, and<br />

compassion.<br />

Professional development for teachers and administrators is a primary<br />

focus at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>. Substantial resources provide<br />

faculty assistance in integrating research­based knowledge about<br />

teaching, learning, leadership, and curriculum into their practice. In order<br />

to update curriculum, teaching methodologies, and leadership concepts,<br />

teachers and administrators regularly attend conferences and workshops,<br />

participate in and present at national and local organizations, and<br />

subscribe to relevant subject and teaching publications. As a result,<br />

teachers are beginning to design and implement a variety of learning<br />

experiences using their knowledge of effective teaching strategies:<br />

traditional lecture, cooperative group learning, discovery learning, audiovisual<br />

presentations, lab, demonstrations, library and online research, art<br />

projects, class discussions, games, computer work, role play, debates,<br />

field trips, simulations, and the adoption of Blackboard® across the<br />

curriculum.<br />

Information and methodologies from mandatory workshops and in­service<br />

training such as Studying Skillful Teaching, Peer Mentoring,<br />

Understanding by Design, and Cooperative Learning, complemented by<br />

an understanding of the latest research on pedagogy and teaching, assist<br />

teachers in designing effective instructional strategies to support student<br />

achievement. The school maintains a professional development website<br />

available to faculty within and outside of <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> that<br />

provides a library of current pedagogical research, circulates diverse<br />

articles, books, films, and newsletters; and notifies faculty and staff of<br />

relevant opportunities for professional development. Data gathered from<br />

the Faculty Survey indicates support for professional growth with 91% of<br />

respondents indicating that they strongly agree or agree with the<br />

statement, “There is sufficient support and encouragement for my<br />

academic growth.”<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

66


To ensure active learning for all students, teachers apply varied<br />

instructional methodologies, diverse materials, and innovative technology<br />

implementation strategies. When planning lessons, teachers consider<br />

different learning styles in order to foster academic competence, higherorder<br />

thinking skills, critical thinking, and competence in the use of<br />

technology in all the students. However, Student Survey respondents<br />

expressed mixed reviews of consistent implementation of effective<br />

instructional strategies as only 27% strongly agreed and 42% agreed with<br />

the statement, “My teachers use a variety of teaching methods appropriate<br />

to the subject matter and grade level.” While most teachers have initiated<br />

efforts to improve instructional strategies to meet the needs of all students,<br />

consistent application across the curriculum is an area of growth.<br />

In order to address different learning styles and strengths, students get<br />

specialized study skills instruction in their first year. In the context of<br />

programs such as Freshmen Connections, Freshmen Study Skills, and<br />

Dragon Success, students receive instruction on strategies for effective<br />

note­taking, planning, test­taking skills, basic technology skills, and time<br />

management. Additionally, teachers receive the Freshmen Study Skills<br />

reference book. However, leadership in furthering the active<br />

implementation of these study skills across the curriculum is needed. The<br />

2006 Student Survey indicates that students have not effectively<br />

developed strong study skills. Only 57% of students strongly agreed or<br />

agreed with the statement, “I have developed good study habits.” Fortyone<br />

percent of students strongly agreed or agreed with the statement,<br />

“Teachers discuss how we can manage our time to accomplish work<br />

efficiently.” Evidence demonstrates that effective and consistent<br />

instruction in organization, time management, and study skills strategies<br />

across the curriculum is an area of growth.<br />

The Dragon Success Program, implemented at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> in 2006, has exhibited exemplary success in addressing learning<br />

differences and in providing resources and support of qualifying students<br />

for improving organization and time management skills. In the context of<br />

Dragon Success, 14 teachers provide tutorial sessions before and after<br />

school, and their Dragon Success mentor and school counselor assesses<br />

program participants. During the spring semester 2007, 47 students<br />

participated in Dragon Success, with 44 of those students raising their<br />

GPAs. The Dragon Success Program has generated much more demand<br />

than <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd can accommodate. Additional resources are required<br />

in order to address the needs of all students who would benefit from this<br />

individualized and effective program. Additionally, the newly created<br />

Academic Support Center addresses student needs in a variety of subject<br />

areas with tutoring available before, during, and after school. The school<br />

has committed a 3/5 position to develop and manage adult and peer<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

67


tutors. Expanded library hours help accommodate this program. Over 50<br />

trained peer tutors work with this program.<br />

As part of the admission process, freshmen with physical, emotional, and<br />

learning needs provide the Counseling Department with documentation.<br />

The Director of Learning Needs makes recommendations to teachers for<br />

appropriate accommodations including extended testing time, use of<br />

special aids, and working alone or in collaborative settings. Families<br />

receive information on testing and referrals as appropriate. Information<br />

gathered in the 2006 Faculty Survey indicates that 89% of faculty strongly<br />

agree or agree with the statement, “As a teacher, I consider student<br />

learning differences when planning curriculum.” Additionally, 78% of<br />

faculty respondents strongly agreed or agreed with the statement, “There<br />

is adequate support at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> for students with learning<br />

differences.” While teachers indicate a strong support for the Learning<br />

Needs Program, teachers continue to need effective support and<br />

resources to understand appropriate and evolving strategies for<br />

addressing unique student needs.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd recognizes that a positive atmosphere is conducive to<br />

student learning. Students, faculty, and staff are encouraged as a<br />

community to model and practice the school Mission, Philosophy, and<br />

ESLRs. Information gathered in the Student Survey indicates that 62% of<br />

students strongly agree or agree with the statement, “My teachers and<br />

coaches are good role models of Catholic values.” Sixty­eight percent of<br />

the student respondents strongly agree or agree with the statement, “The<br />

curriculum and instruction reflect the Mission and Philosophy.” Students<br />

indicate that teachers demonstrate inconsistent attitudes toward them as<br />

students, as 23% strongly agree and 38% agree with the statement, “My<br />

teachers are approachable and care about me as a person.” Student<br />

response indicates a need to build a stronger presence of Mission and<br />

demonstration of the ESLRs consistently across the curriculum and into<br />

the fabric of the school.<br />

Students, parents, and faculty regularly provide feedback for on­going<br />

modification of the learning environment and classroom setting. For<br />

example, the 2006­07 implementation of the Power<strong>School</strong>® online grading<br />

program occurred as a response to parent requests and interviews. The<br />

school as a whole emphasizes an atmosphere of mutual respect in<br />

addressing the Mission to embrace cultural differences. Examples of the<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd Mission in action include celebrations of multiculturalism<br />

through courses, clubs, and school­wide events. The Church and the<br />

African American Community religion elective, the Black Student Union<br />

(BSU) club, Asian Student Union, Hispanic club, Jewish club, and the<br />

Multicultural Assembly offer opportunity for students to embrace the<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd Mission.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

68


In 2006­07, 29 teachers at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd attended technology<br />

conferences in order to learn the latest technology affecting student<br />

achievement. Approximately 20 teachers attend CUE (Computer­Using<br />

Educators) conference and NECC (National Educational Computing<br />

Conference) annually. Participants of the conferences return to <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd to share the latest ideas for classroom integration and innovation<br />

with faculty and staff. Students directly benefit as teachers apply these<br />

new technology skills in the classroom. The new Computer Art II course,<br />

which integrates state­of­the­art animation software, and the addition of<br />

Rosetta Stone® software in World Languages classes are examples of<br />

recently applied innovations.<br />

Within the school, the newly enhanced Information Technology<br />

Department addresses the needs of the entire student body, faculty, and<br />

staff to ensure that the school­wide goal of improving the use of<br />

technology throughout the curriculum becomes a reality. Students and<br />

teachers increasingly use the Internet as a source of information. In<br />

response to this educational trend, one of the major goals of all<br />

departments is to increase the level of understanding and expertise in the<br />

use of technology as a transparent instructional tool. To respond to this<br />

need, the Information Technology Department provides individualized and<br />

group training for teachers who wish to implement the use of technology in<br />

the classroom. Weekly workshops include such topics as Basic Tablet<br />

Tools, Blackboard®, PowerGrade®, and Rosetta Stone®.<br />

Formal and informal interviews with faculty indicate a concern regarding<br />

class size. While some classes are smaller (20­25) due to space limitation<br />

and student interest, others are considered too large by teacher standards<br />

(30­35). In order to address the needs of students in the newly created<br />

Algebra 1a and Algebra 1b, the class size was reduced. Members of the<br />

English Department, however, recommend that smaller class size would<br />

accommodate more opportunities for writing and assessment. The World<br />

Languages Department advocates smaller class size in order to provide<br />

more opportunities for language acquisition, practice, and application.<br />

Data analysis on the relationship of class size and student achievement is<br />

an area of growth.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> moved to the alternating day/rotating block<br />

schedule in 2003. The Scheduling Committee reviewed the effectiveness<br />

of the schedule in 2006 and recommended revisions. The core<br />

recommendations suggested teacher training and a clear vision of the<br />

expectations and effective strategies for teaching in the block period. In<br />

addition, the need to convey a consistent message to students on the<br />

expectations for learning in the block schedule, as well as to provide<br />

student­assistance programs and counseling for students who struggle<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

69


with the schedule should be considered. On­going evaluation of the<br />

effectiveness of the daily and yearly schedule and its impact on student<br />

learning is an area of growth.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. Professional development for teachers and administrators is a primary<br />

focus at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>. Faculty members receive<br />

substantial resources for professional development targeted at<br />

integrating research­based knowledge about teaching, learning,<br />

leadership, and curriculum into their practice.<br />

2. The Dragon Success Program, implemented at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> in 2006, has demonstrated exemplary success in addressing<br />

learning differences and in providing resources and support to all<br />

students for improving organization and time management skills.<br />

3. The school as a whole emphasizes an atmosphere of mutual respect<br />

in keeping with <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s Mission to embrace cultural<br />

differences.<br />

4. A growing number of teachers at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd attend technology<br />

workshops in order to learn the latest technology affecting student<br />

achievement.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Sample tests, quizzes, exams<br />

· Dragon Success statistics<br />

· AP French Podcasts session and students’ voice samples<br />

· Department project samples<br />

· Student work samples<br />

· Legacy project survey: teaching methodology, critical thinking, and<br />

creativity.<br />

· College Board publication regarding LD<br />

· Statistics on technology conferences<br />

· IT Workshops<br />

· Scheduling Committee survey and recommendations<br />

· Student academic plan (sample)<br />

· Parent­Teacher conferences<br />

· Course evaluations<br />

· Faculty and Student Handbooks<br />

· PowerGrade®<br />

· Faculty Mentor Binder<br />

· Report of mentoring<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

70


· Department surveys<br />

· Student work<br />

· Information technology list of resources<br />

· Classroom maintenance<br />

· Course projects and posters<br />

· Teacher Blackboard classes<br />

· Deforestation Handout<br />

· Recycle Week Pamphlets and posters<br />

· Fine art critiques<br />

· Videotapes<br />

· Department surveys<br />

· Class lists/ schedules/teacher­student ratios<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Design and implement instructional strategies across the curriculum to<br />

meet the needs of all students.<br />

Rationale: Teachers receive on­going training, peer mentoring, and<br />

examples of best practices in teaching and learning. These strategies<br />

need to be translated into day­to­day classroom teaching.<br />

2. Implement effective and consistent instruction in organization, time<br />

management, and study skills strategies across the curriculum.<br />

Rationale: Students receive study skills instruction in their first year<br />

during freshman orientation. Teachers need to incorporate these<br />

strategies into their classes.<br />

3. Educate teachers and provide appropriate resources to understand<br />

and address the unique learning needs of each student.<br />

Rationale: In an effort to ensure that all students achieve the ESLRs in<br />

a learning environment appropriate to their needs, teachers require the<br />

necessary resources and strategies.<br />

4. Develop a stronger presence of Mission and demonstration of the<br />

ESLRs consistently across the curriculum.<br />

Rationale: Student and faculty surveys indicate a need for a greater<br />

emphasis and incorporation of the newly revised Mission and ESLRs<br />

into the life of the school.<br />

5. Develop understanding and expertise in the use of technology as a<br />

transparent instructional tool.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

71


Rationale: In order to infuse 21 st century skills into teaching and<br />

learning, teachers need technology training and appropriate classroom<br />

resources.<br />

6. Evaluate the effectiveness of the daily and yearly schedule and its<br />

impact on student learning.<br />

Rationale: The newly revised daily and yearly schedules need ongoing<br />

evaluation in order to determine if current scheduling promotes<br />

the best student learning outcomes.<br />

7. Analyze the relationship of class size and student achievement.<br />

Rationale: Teachers in several departments express concern over the<br />

size of classes and the ability to engage all students effectively.<br />

“I believe very strongly that the school embodies the spirituality<br />

and values of its mission statement, and fosters<br />

a sense of community for all of the students.”<br />

– Parent Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

72


B3 Curriculum and Instruction Criterion: How Assessment is Used<br />

To what extent is teacher and student use of assessment frequent<br />

and integrated into the teaching/learning process? To what extent<br />

are assessment results the basis for measurement of each student’s<br />

progress toward the expected school­wide learning results? To what<br />

extent are the assessment results the basis for regular evaluation<br />

and improvement of curriculum and instruction? To what extent are<br />

the assessment results the basis for the allocation of resources?<br />

The use of assessment at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is frequent and<br />

integrated into the teaching and learning process. It is the basis of the<br />

measurement for each student’s progress toward achieving student<br />

outcomes, is used for evaluating and improving curriculum and instruction,<br />

and is the basis for the allocation of resources.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s curriculum incorporates a wide range of assessment<br />

strategies to promote student growth and address student needs in the<br />

classroom. Teachers consider individual student needs when designing<br />

assessments and as a result, provide students with a variety of<br />

opportunities to convey their understanding of learning objectives. Using<br />

written assignments, daily homework, oral assessments, technologybased<br />

presentations, cooperative group work, paper and pencil tests,<br />

dramatization, and standardized tests, teachers effectively evaluate<br />

students’ growth in content area­specific knowledge as well as study skills<br />

and higher­order thinking skills. Revision is also an important part of the<br />

assessment process as most departments allow or require students to<br />

revise their work and submit it in stages for teacher and peer review.<br />

Sixty­seven percent of respondents in the Student Survey strongly agreed<br />

or agree with the statement, “In my classes in general, I am able to<br />

demonstrate my learning not only through quizzes and tests, but also in<br />

other was such as creative projects, essays, portfolios, oral presentations,<br />

and discussions.” Ninety­seven percent of respondents in the Teacher<br />

Survey strongly agree or agree with the statement, “I use a variety of<br />

assessment techniques to measure expected student learning results.”<br />

Teachers report that a variety of assessment techniques are used<br />

regularly in the classroom, but inconsistency in student recognition of that<br />

process indicates that further professional development is needed in<br />

designing, integrating, and clearly communicating a variety of assessment<br />

techniques.<br />

Departments at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd are beginning to design assessments<br />

aligned with stated learning objectives and expected outcomes in specific<br />

areas of the standards­based curriculum. Meeting expected outcomes<br />

becomes the assessment of student growth. However, the school needs<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

73


to implement strategies for providing time for collaboration and<br />

professional development in designing a consistent school­wide practice<br />

for standards­based assessment and analysis of cross­curricular student<br />

outcomes.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd offers programs to help students improve performance on<br />

assessments. Dragon Success is yielding positive results (See Section<br />

C2, Support Services) as well as the Academic Support Center and Peer<br />

Homework Support Program. Additionally, extended time testing for<br />

students with special needs and training for teachers in addressing these<br />

needs requires assessment.<br />

Emphasis on the ESLRs in curriculum planning, teaching, evaluation, and<br />

outcomes, guides the teaching and learning at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd. While<br />

some teachers incorporate the ESLRs into classroom instruction, at this<br />

time, the integration is intuitive rather than overt. Information gathered<br />

from the 2006 Faculty Survey indicates that only 36% of faculty agree or<br />

strongly agree with the statement, “Students understand the <strong>School</strong>’s<br />

ESLRs.” An effective ESLR assessment process is needed to evaluate<br />

whether students achieve the school’s ESLRs. Enhanced effort in clearly<br />

communicating and assessing the school expectations and school ESLRs<br />

is critical to improving school­wide student outcomes and effective ESLR<br />

assessment tools need to be developed to measure student achievement<br />

of ESLRs.<br />

On­going formative assessment provides teaching and learning feedback<br />

for teachers, students, and parents and offers data to support curriculum<br />

revisions to further support effective instructional strategies. A few<br />

examples of formative assessment at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd include English<br />

Department portfolios, Religion Department journals, Math Department<br />

grading rubrics, and in­class and rubric­based writing assignments. An<br />

area for growth is the need to institutionalize the process of formative<br />

assessment by helping teachers understand the importance of data­driven<br />

instruction and assessment.<br />

Additionally, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd uses standardized tests to determine student<br />

preparation for the curricula and to place incoming freshmen into<br />

appropriate English, Science, Math, World Languages, and Social Studies<br />

classes. Some of these placement test results place students with special<br />

educational needs in math and reading classes that reinforce study skills<br />

and support students in achieving course outcomes. Students are further<br />

assessed through standardized testing one day a year, when freshmen<br />

take the NEDT test, sophomores take the PLAN test, and juniors take the<br />

PSAT. Students also take Advanced Placement exams annually in May<br />

and results are monitored and recorded. However, the school has not<br />

consistently tracked and analyzed the data from such standardized tests<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

74


including data from SATs, SAT Subject Tests, and other available data<br />

from the APs, PSATs, NEDT, and PLAN tests. The College Board offers<br />

significant breakdowns of student performance for each of these tests and<br />

the school needs to develop a system to analyze such data with the goal<br />

of developing data­driven curriculum decision­making.<br />

The introduction of the online grading program Power<strong>School</strong>® has offered<br />

expanded opportunity for parents, students, teachers, counselors, and<br />

administrators to monitor and track student progress and achievement.<br />

Teachers are required to post grades every two weeks with a minimum of<br />

15 assignments posted per quarter. Analysis of assignment quality and<br />

frequency of teacher feedback has become more transparent for all<br />

constituencies through use of the Power<strong>School</strong>® system. Parents and<br />

students continue to provide positive feedback on the system and have<br />

complimented the school on investing in the implementation of the<br />

program.<br />

In 2006, <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> hired a full time Director of Information Services<br />

responsible for disaggregating data, surveys, and software. The school<br />

recognizes that data gathering and survey processes should be on­going<br />

and systematic, taking all areas of the school into account. Understanding<br />

the areas of data analysis and the application of that data is an area of<br />

growth.<br />

This year, as part of the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> self­study planning process, four<br />

surveys were designed and administered: (a) the Alumni Survey, (b) the<br />

Faculty Survey, (c) the Parent Survey, and (d) the Student Survey. This<br />

data was used for narratives and the complete results are listed in the<br />

<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Self Study Appendix B. There is need for each academic<br />

department to work with the Director of Information Services to prepare<br />

and analyze surveys of graduates about the strengths and areas for<br />

growth of their education while at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. The use of assessment at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is frequent and<br />

integrated into the teaching and learning process.<br />

2. Departments at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd are beginning to design assessments<br />

aligned with stated learning objectives and expected outcomes in<br />

specific areas of the standards­based curriculum.<br />

3. The Dragon Success Program, Academic Support Center, and Peer<br />

Homework Support Program provide tutors to work with individual<br />

students and is yielding positive results.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

75


4. Expected school­wide learning results are integrated into curriculum,<br />

teaching, evaluation, and outcomes.<br />

5. The introduction of Power<strong>School</strong>® expands the opportunity for parents,<br />

students, teachers, counselors, and administrators to monitor and track<br />

student progress and achievement.<br />

6. As part of the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> self­study, four surveys were designed<br />

and evaluated: the Alumni Survey, the Faculty Survey, the Parent<br />

Survey, and the Student Survey.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Pre­ and post­ reading tests<br />

· English Department essays<br />

· History Department PowerPoint® assignments<br />

· Art portfolios<br />

· Drama monologues<br />

· Oral assessments<br />

· Study Skills Program<br />

· Comprehensive final exams<br />

· Learning Needs Program<br />

· Web research assignments<br />

· Department scope and sequence<br />

· <strong>School</strong> schedule<br />

· Campus Ministry retreats<br />

· Service Learning program<br />

· Multicultural Week events<br />

· Semester exams<br />

· AP French curriculum<br />

· Holocaust curriculum<br />

· HSPT, SAT, PSAT, and PLAN results<br />

· Progress reports<br />

· Academic probation<br />

· Parent­Teacher conferences<br />

· Back­to­<strong>School</strong> Night<br />

· No Child Left Behind funding<br />

· Degrees of faculty<br />

· New classrooms<br />

· Technology in­service<br />

· Technology support team<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

76


Areas of Growth<br />

1. Design a consistent school­wide professional development program<br />

and practice in order to help teachers design, integrate, and clearly<br />

communicate a standards­based assessment and analysis of crosscurricular<br />

student outcomes.<br />

Rationale: While teachers feel that they use a variety of assessment<br />

techniques, student surveys indicate that further development and<br />

implementation is necessary.<br />

2. Develop effective tools for clearly communicating and assessing the<br />

school ESLRs.<br />

Rationale: Since the ESLRs were revised in 2006, the school also<br />

needs to revise the tools necessary to evaluate student achievement of<br />

the ESRLs.<br />

3. Institutionalize the process of formative assessment by helping<br />

teachers understand the importance of data­driven instruction and<br />

assessment.<br />

Rationale: Frequent use of well­designed formative assessments<br />

increases student achievement. Faculty will require training in the<br />

effective collection, analysis, and interpretation of relevant data.<br />

4. Analyze standardized test score data with the goal of developing datadriven<br />

curriculum.<br />

Rationale: Data from standardized tests, such as SAT Subject Tests<br />

and PSAT, need to be collected and analyzed to further evaluate<br />

effectiveness of curriculum and student achievement.<br />

“I think the general atmosphere within all the classes and student body<br />

as well as the diversity are strengths at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.”<br />

– Student Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

77


Category C: Support for Student Spiritual, Personal, and Academic<br />

Growth<br />

C1. Campus Ministry/Community Based Service Learning<br />

To what extent do students grow as persons of faith through<br />

appropriate and meaningful experiences of prayer, liturgy, and<br />

community –based service learning which support spiritual<br />

formation, the philosophy and mission of the school, and the<br />

accomplishment of the ESLRs?<br />

In support of the school’s Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs, <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> offers a comprehensive program to, “…develop<br />

young men and women of competence, conscience and compassion”,<br />

and “…to develop persons of influence who are loving, open to growth,<br />

religious…and skilled leaders committed to justice and peace.”<br />

The new school leadership expanded the Campus Ministry program<br />

leading to:<br />

· Elevation of Campus Minister to Assistant Principal for Campus<br />

Ministry<br />

· Increased staffing in Campus Ministry (by 1.2 FTE)<br />

· Expanded Service Learning Program and the addition of a Service<br />

Learning Coordinator<br />

· Creation of an Adult Spirituality Program<br />

· Increased student opportunities for leadership and participation in<br />

Campus Ministry<br />

The existing and newly expanded programs in Campus Ministry fall into<br />

six areas: prayer, liturgy, retreats, leadership opportunities, service<br />

learning, and charity drives.<br />

Prayer is a critical component of the religious life of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd and<br />

promotes student spirituality in a number of ways. Ninety­one percent of<br />

parents indicate that the Campus Ministry programs support student<br />

spiritual development. Seventy­five percent of faculty state that the school<br />

provides students with a variety of spiritual experiences that are<br />

meaningful to young people. Sixty­six percent of students agree that the<br />

school provides a variety of prayer opportunities. Morning prayer, led by<br />

both students and faculty, begins each school day, reminding the<br />

community of our common purpose and Catholic identity. Prayer is a<br />

central component of classroom instructional practices and student and<br />

faculty retreats.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

78


Liturgies are at the heart of the school’s Catholic identity and proclamation<br />

of the Gospel message. A highlight of each new school year is the<br />

opening school liturgy. Monthly all­school liturgies build our faith<br />

community in an atmosphere of prayer, reflection, and celebration. Prior to<br />

these liturgies, the student­led Campus Ministry Team and Campus<br />

Ministry staff collaborate with faculty in liturgical instruction to promote a<br />

prayerful atmosphere. Individual classes gather for liturgy under the<br />

leadership of Class Ministry Teams. In an effort to meet the spiritual needs<br />

and build community in each of the grades, individual class liturgies were<br />

introduced during the 2005­06 school year. The sacrament of<br />

reconciliation is offered to the student body during Lent. A school­wide<br />

ecumenical service is celebrated each spring in support of students from<br />

non­Catholic traditions.<br />

Student surveys demonstrate that 46% of students state that liturgies and<br />

prayer services are meaningful events for them. Sixty­one percent of<br />

students state that they have opportunity to provide input for liturgies<br />

through the Campus Ministry Teams. Seventy­two percent of teachers<br />

state that school liturgies and prayer services are celebrations of who we<br />

are as a school community. Developing a systematic process for<br />

reviewing the effectiveness of liturgical experiences for students and<br />

faculty is an area of growth. As liturgical offerings increase, the need for a<br />

liturgy coordinator should be explored.<br />

The current facilities are too small to fit our entire community, resulting in<br />

all­school liturgies concurrently held in the large and small gyms. A space<br />

that can accommodate the entire student body is needed in order to<br />

gather as one community in prayer and celebration. Additionally, the<br />

current chapel cannot accommodate enough students for single class<br />

liturgies. The school needs a chapel large for single class liturgies. The<br />

placement of a Campus Ministry Center adjacent to such a chapel will<br />

further strengthen the work of Campus Ministry by providing a spiritual<br />

center for the school.<br />

The <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> retreat program is a hallmark of the<br />

Campus Ministry Program and an essential part of the spiritual growth of<br />

students. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> offers a comprehensive retreat<br />

program teaming with key leaders, teachers, and students in its planning,<br />

implementation, and evaluation. The retreat program involves students at<br />

all grade levels. Freshmen and sophomores participate in a one­day<br />

retreat, working in small groups led by juniors and seniors. Juniors and<br />

seniors have the opportunity to participate in overnight retreats. The<br />

themes of the junior and senior retreats are “values” and “journey”<br />

respectively.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

79


Campus Ministry promotes active leadership throughout its programs in a<br />

variety of ways. Students are encouraged to become leaders in ministry<br />

through class ministry teams and the retreat team. In order to meet the<br />

spiritual needs of the students and to include more students in the<br />

liturgical life of the school, Campus Ministry staff guide the Freshmen,<br />

Sophomore, and Junior Class Ministry Teams in the development of age<br />

appropriate themes for liturgical celebrations and faith sharing<br />

experiences. The existing Senior Campus Ministry Team meets as a class<br />

and leads school­wide gatherings, teaching, and involving the younger<br />

class ministry teams. An average of 20 students per class participates in<br />

each of the ministry teams. Approximately 100 junior and senior students<br />

volunteer to be Retreat Team leaders. Retreat Team leaders are trained to<br />

lead freshmen and sophomore retreats, during which they share their own<br />

journeys in faith development. All of the above leadership opportunities<br />

encourage students in critical thinking, public speaking, small group<br />

discussions, decision­making, and self­reflection.<br />

Annually, 100 juniors and 150 seniors choose to participate in retreats,<br />

indicating that students are interested in these experiences. Evaluation of<br />

the retreat program takes place after each overnight retreat, the results of<br />

which continue to be positive. According to the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> surveys,<br />

75% of students state that retreats provide opportunities to develop and<br />

enhance their faith and spirituality. Through dialogue with other Catholic<br />

high schools, varieties of retreat models have emerged. Some of the<br />

models under investigation require increased staffing. The rising cost of<br />

transportation, housing, and food on overnight retreats has increased the<br />

need for financial aid for students attending retreats. In keeping with our<br />

policy of not turning anyone away based on financial need, the school has<br />

been distributing increased amounts of scholarship aid for retreat<br />

attendance. As a result, the Campus Ministry team needs to investigate<br />

other forms of retreats, resources, funding, and staffing in order to<br />

enhance students’ personal faith and spiritual formation.<br />

In keeping with the school’s Mission and Philosophy, the new President<br />

and Principal have provided leadership in the creation of the Service<br />

Learning Program. Students, faculty, and staff have a variety of<br />

opportunities to participate in this program. The Service Learning<br />

Coordinator works with Campus Ministry staff to facilitate a program for all<br />

grade levels that is committed to the principles of Catholic social teaching.<br />

Beginning with the class of 2010, each student is required to fulfill 100<br />

hours of community service. All freshmen commit to 15 hours of service<br />

with the elderly, while sophomores commit 25 hours of service to children<br />

with disabilities and the homeless. Juniors and seniors commit to 60 hours<br />

of working with a particular population of their choosing. Throughout the<br />

four­year program, service is linked to in­class instruction on social justice<br />

issues. Upper­division coursework in Christian Morality, Bay Area Social<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

80


Concerns, Alternatives to Violence, and Community Service Project<br />

incorporate social justice issues with service learning in the local<br />

community. Ninety percent of parents state that the school fosters a sense<br />

of community responsibility through its Christian Service and other<br />

programs. Forty­eight percent of students state that they are aware of the<br />

expanded Service Learning Program. However, this statistic was gathered<br />

during the first semester of the program’s existence. Visibility of this<br />

program needs to be enhanced so that students can express their<br />

awareness of this program and its goals.<br />

Campus Ministry is a leader in school­wide initiatives that support local<br />

and global charities. The annual Food and Toy Drive, the annual Mission<br />

Drive, and monthly Dollar Day collections are central to this effort.<br />

Students, faculty, and staff are challenged to put their faith into action.<br />

Spiritual growth is promoted by raising awareness of the needs of others<br />

in our community and in the world. In 2005­2006, our students, faculty,<br />

and staff contributed over $20,000 to various charitable organizations.<br />

Eighty­three percent of students state that Dollar Days and Charity drives<br />

reflect the school’s Mission and values. Sixty­nine percent of students<br />

state they have learned about helping others as a result of the school’s<br />

Dollar Days and Charity drives.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. The expansion of the Campus Ministry program enhances the spiritual<br />

and personal growth of all students.<br />

2. The <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd Retreat program is a hallmark of the Campus<br />

Ministry program, enhancing the spiritual growth of students.<br />

3. The newly created Service Learning program and the addition of a<br />

Service Learning Coordinator promote the principles of Catholic social<br />

teaching.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Student, Faculty, Parent Surveys<br />

· Retreat information<br />

· Service Learning outline<br />

· Service Learning and retreat reflections<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Develop a systematic process for reviewing the effectiveness of<br />

liturgical experiences for students and faculty.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

81


Rationale: Student and Faculty Surveys indicate that there is a need<br />

for greater spiritual guidance and connectedness.<br />

2. Build a chapel that can accommodate the class liturgies and an<br />

adjacent Campus Ministry Center, as well as a space that can<br />

accommodate the entire student body.<br />

Rationale: The school needs a spiritual center and a space where the<br />

entire school community can gather in prayer and celebration.<br />

3. Investigate other forms of retreats, resources, funding, and staffing.<br />

Rationale: Students report that retreats are meaningful to their<br />

personal faith development. Other forms of retreats should be<br />

investigated and funding sources identified, to enable all students to<br />

growth to their spiritual potential.<br />

4. Enhance visibility of the Campus Ministry and Service Learning<br />

programs and opportunities.<br />

Rationale: Many of the programs within this department are new. In<br />

order for students to take full advantage of these programs, Campus<br />

Ministry and Service Learning Programs need promotion.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

82


C2. Student Connectedness Criterion<br />

To what extent are students connected to a system of support<br />

services, activities, and opportunities within the school’s community<br />

of faith that meets the challenges of the curricular/co­curricular<br />

program in order to achieve the ESLRs?<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> students are supported by a network of<br />

services, activities, clubs, interest groups, fine arts, athletics, and spiritual<br />

opportunities within the curricular and co­curricular program in alignment<br />

with the Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs. In recognition of the importance<br />

of these programs to student life on campus, in June 2007 the<br />

administration elevated the position of Director for Campus Life to<br />

Assistant Principal for Campus Life.<br />

Counseling<br />

Five full­time counselors, a Director of Learning Needs , and a Registrar<br />

staff <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>’s Counseling Department. The current<br />

counselor­student ratio is 1:233. Students meet with their counselors to<br />

discuss academic, personal, college, and career issues. Students are<br />

oriented to the support services provided by the Counseling Center at the<br />

beginning of their freshman year or, in the case of transfers, at the<br />

beginning of their first semester at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd. Students continue to<br />

work in collaboration with their assigned counselor throughout their four<br />

years. Students are able to self­refer or are referred by peers, teachers,<br />

parents, and adults in the school community for a variety of personal and<br />

academic issues. Support groups, such as cancer support, eating<br />

disorders, depression, and adjustment issues, are available to students<br />

during the school day. Students evidence a growing need for additional<br />

personal, group, and individual counseling. In order to enhance the range<br />

of services and provide students and their families a fully effective,<br />

personal, and comprehensive counseling program, a reduction in the<br />

counselor to student ratio (1:125) is recommended.<br />

Formal counselor meetings occur twice yearly for freshmen, once yearly<br />

for sophomores, and numerous times for juniors and seniors. Both group<br />

and individual support are available and accessed by students and their<br />

parents. On an annual basis, over 1200 students self­initiate<br />

appointments. Academic advising includes programming for each<br />

successive year, problem solving, and study skills advisement.<br />

In spring 2007, the Counseling Department introduced Naviance®, an online<br />

college application and career planning system. Through Family<br />

Connection, a component of Naviance®, students, parents, and<br />

counselors can collaborate in the college application process.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

83


College counseling begins formally during the sophomore year when<br />

PLAN test results are reported to the students. Naviance® is introduced to<br />

students at this time, and they complete a Learning Style Inventory, the<br />

results of which are available to students, counselors, and parents. In the<br />

fall, juniors take the PSAT and meet with parent volunteers to learn how to<br />

use the College Board website and Naviance® for college research.<br />

Throughout the spring semester, counselors and juniors form a<br />

partnership in the process of investigation that includes numerous<br />

meetings, visits to the Career Center, planning for college admissions<br />

testing, and college visits.<br />

Counselors work individually with seniors as they navigate the college<br />

admissions process, by fine­tuning college lists, previewing essays, and<br />

supporting students through the college application and financial aid<br />

process. Through this partnership, students are able to think critically<br />

about life choices, make appropriate decisions, and manage the college<br />

admissions process.<br />

Each fall, the Counseling Department organizes and holds an extensive<br />

College Fair for juniors and seniors. Students from diocesan Catholic high<br />

schools are invited to attend. In January, a Financial Aid Night is<br />

presented to seniors and their parents to familiarize them with the federal<br />

and institutional processes. Parents of sophomores, juniors, and seniors<br />

are invited to attend evening workshops on a variety of topics of interest in<br />

support of student success.<br />

During the summer of 2007, counselors and religion teachers completed a<br />

Summer Curriculum Grant to redesign the College Planning Process and<br />

Career Week, incorporating Naviance® as an essential component in the<br />

college process. This process includes information on values clarification<br />

and connection of career interest areas to college choices that is<br />

incorporated into freshmen and junior religion courses by the counseling<br />

staff.<br />

According to the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> surveys, 57% of students state that<br />

counselors help them make wise decisions and enable them to manage<br />

their time so that they are able to succeed academically. Sixty­three<br />

percent state that their counselor follows up on actions that he or she<br />

agreed to do. Sixty­eight percent state that their counselor shows care and<br />

concern of them as a person. Seventy­two percent of students understand<br />

how to use the counseling services, and 73% believe that their counselors<br />

are knowledgeable and informative about the college application process.<br />

Seventy­eight percent of parents state that counselors are accessible and<br />

responsive to parent needs. The scope of counseling services needs to be<br />

defined and the necessary resources articulated to provide support for all<br />

students in the areas of academic, personal, and college/career<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

84


counseling. Through communication and partnerships with students,<br />

faculty, and parents, students are supported in the achievement of the<br />

ESLRs.<br />

Academic Support<br />

Students are supported academically through a variety of programs.<br />

Students formally and informally access teachers for tutoring during class,<br />

before, during, and after school, by appointment, as well as during the<br />

Meeting Period (MP). Their counselor and the Assistant Principal of<br />

Academics, through a formal system of meetings and progress reports,<br />

individually monitor students who are on academic probation, below a 2.0<br />

at the end of a marking period. This system was instituted in 2005­06.<br />

Students and counselors work together to develop individual academic<br />

strategies that are documented in an Academic Probation Contract, the<br />

goal of which is to encourage students to become academic achievers.<br />

Interventions may include enrollment in the Dragon Success Program<br />

(organizational and time management strategies), visits to the Academic<br />

Support Center, and individual tutoring with teachers, peer mentors, or<br />

tutors. The Counseling Department maintains an updated referral list of<br />

tutors, learning specialists, and individual therapists.<br />

The recent introduction of Power<strong>School</strong>® to the school community allows<br />

students to have real­time access to records, which promotes student selfadvocacy<br />

and responsibility. During the first semester that Power<strong>School</strong>®<br />

was available by Internet access, 93% of students and parents accessed<br />

grades and/or attendance one or more times. Each of these programs<br />

strengthens the support network for our students so they can achieve<br />

academic success.<br />

Learning Needs Program<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> admits students in accordance with criteria<br />

considered indicators of success and seeks to educate students within the<br />

context of the school’s Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs. In keeping with<br />

the commitment to “… create a unique and diverse community,” the<br />

school recognizes that each student is unique and learns in a variety of<br />

ways. The school recognizes that students with diagnosed learning<br />

differences may be in need of additional support so that they may have a<br />

fair and reasonable opportunity for success.<br />

The Learning Needs Program is open to students in grades 9­12 with a<br />

documented learning disability. The program seeks to educate and<br />

support students for success through teamwork. Students, parents, and<br />

teachers enter into a partnership through education, understanding,<br />

communication, and commitment as a means of ensuring academic<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

85


success. The Director of Learning Needs oversees the program, provides<br />

educational counseling and intervention, teacher professional<br />

development, and parent education opportunities. The Director also<br />

reviews the recommendations provided by educational specialists.<br />

Students work as needed with the Director of Learning Needs ,<br />

counselors, and classroom teachers.<br />

2002­2003 2003­2004 2004­2005 2005­2007 2006­2007<br />

43 48 56 54 57<br />

Number of students with documented learning disabilities enrolled in the Learning Needs<br />

Program<br />

A hallmark of the Learning Needs Program is the after­school program,<br />

Dragon Success. Students enroll for one semester and receive support in<br />

skills related to academic success. These include time­management,<br />

planning, note­taking, organization, study skills, and test­taking strategies.<br />

Students, parents, and academic “coaches” enter into an agreement, the<br />

goal of which is increased measures of success. While originally designed<br />

for students challenged by AD/HD, Dragon Success is open to any<br />

struggling student. A mandatory parent orientation session includes<br />

techniques for support at home, increased communication skills, and<br />

follow through. The program has been in existence for three semesters<br />

and has seen dramatic results.<br />

Semester Spring, 2006 Fall, 2006 Spring, 2007<br />

# of Students 45 44 47<br />

# of Raised GPAs 38 39 44<br />

Dragon Success Staff<br />

Spring, 2006 Fall, 2006 Spring, 2007<br />

# of Staff 9 11 14<br />

Ave. # of Days 1.89 1.9 2.0<br />

Title I Program<br />

A small number of students qualify for No Child Left Behind, Title I funding<br />

for additional academic support based upon HSPT scores. Students with<br />

reading and math scores below grade level receive intensive after­school<br />

tutorials to build skills and the capacity to succeed in a college prep<br />

curriculum. Students meet in small groups with a trained staff member to<br />

assist in study skills and content related tutoring. The program is a<br />

partnership between students, staff, and parents with all participants<br />

committing to an educational agreement. Since its inception, the Title I<br />

program has served over 45 students.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

86


Title I Funds and Number of Students Served<br />

2003­ 2004­2005 2005­2006 2006­2007<br />

2004<br />

# of Students<br />

26 19 12 8<br />

Served<br />

NCLB Funds $18,000 $16,000 $15,000 $12,000<br />

Federal Funding, from a high of $18,000, has decreased yearly due to the<br />

increased numbers of private schools drawing from the available pool of<br />

resources. Currently, the program is offered to 9 th grade students. Ongoing<br />

review of the program continues to focus on the success of students<br />

in relation to the number of students served. Focused evaluation of the<br />

Title 1 Program, to determine effectiveness of serving <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

students, needs to be undertaken.<br />

Student Activities and Clubs<br />

In keeping with the Mission and Philosophy, <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

supports over 50 active clubs, committees, and student organizations that<br />

are open to any student (see Appendix C). Approximately 500 students<br />

are currently members of clubs and organizations. Student participation is<br />

encouraged and solicited through a sign­up process at a Club Fair at the<br />

beginning of each year. Club rosters and meeting minutes are updated<br />

and maintained in the Club/Moderator Binder. New clubs form by students<br />

through a formal system of application, the formation of a charter, and the<br />

selection of an adult moderator. Students serve as the leaders of each<br />

club, and actively engage in the planning and implementation of activities.<br />

Sixty­five percent of students state that the school provides meaningful<br />

and organized co­curricular activities outside of sports.<br />

Clubs and organizations meet during the Meeting Period (MP), before and<br />

after school, as well as on the weekends in order to complete business<br />

and plan events. Club meeting information is communicated through the<br />

morning announcements, in homeroom, in student council meetings,<br />

student activities office, and on the website.<br />

Student leadership opportunities are available through class­level and<br />

school­wide student government, as officers, committee members, and<br />

student representatives. Student leaders gain communication and<br />

leadership skills through attendance and participation in summer camps,<br />

in association with diocesan high schools, and coordinated by the office of<br />

Director of Student Activities. Fifty­five percent of students state that<br />

student government leaders are effective in helping communication<br />

between students, teachers, and administration. Further analysis is<br />

needed of student connectedness to student leadership opportunities and<br />

co­curricular activities.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

87


<strong>School</strong>­wide events, such as Spirit Week, Multicultural Week, and Mission<br />

Drive foster the involvement and participation of the student body. Student<br />

council members, club leaders and members, as well as individual<br />

students, participate in planning assemblies and performances. The<br />

Student Activities program continues to explore new ways to involve<br />

students in the extracurricular life of the school, for example; Battle of the<br />

Bands, Junior Ring Ceremony, and Jefferson Awards. An evaluation<br />

process of school­wide events needs to be implemented in order to attract<br />

and involve a larger number of students.<br />

New Student Orientation<br />

New student orientation begins in April with a half­day program for<br />

students and their parents, entitled “Navigating O’Dowd.” Prior to the start<br />

of each school year, new students are oriented to the school by teachers,<br />

administrators, and student government leaders. Topics include study<br />

skills training, campus tours, introductions to personnel, and orientation to<br />

campus technology, as well as topics regarding the Mission and<br />

Philosophy, academic integrity, dress code, and behavior.<br />

In 2006, an orientation program was created and implemented to address<br />

the needs of transfer students and their families. Students new to <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd participate in small groups designed to provide important<br />

information in a personalized setting. Student leaders facilitate the<br />

sessions on student culture, resources, clubs, organizations, activities,<br />

and athletics. Additionally, transfer students met with the Assistant<br />

Principal for Campus Life throughout their first semester to address their<br />

questions and concerns. Parents of transfer students attend a pot­luck<br />

hosted by the Parent Association, which provides orientation, support, and<br />

discussion about the workings of the school. Formal and informal<br />

interviews with students and parents indicate a need for more expanded<br />

freshmen orientation throughout the first year as well as continued support<br />

for transfer students.<br />

Athletics<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd offers a wide variety of opportunities to participate in<br />

athletics. Over 700 student athletes participate in 26 sports (13 each, male<br />

and female) comprised of 55 teams (see Appendix C). The coaching staff<br />

is comprised of 58 coaches: 10 on­campus, 48 off­campus. Directors,<br />

coaches, and trainers in the athletic program are charged with furthering<br />

the Mission of the school. In attempting to achieve this Mission, <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> student­athletes are challenged to demonstrate<br />

openness to growth as they mature physically, emotionally, socially, and<br />

spiritually. Coaches are trained to model good sportsmanship and assist<br />

athletes in the development of their leadership potential. A full­time<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

88


Athletic Director, Assistant Athletic Director, Athletic Trainer, and a parttime<br />

administrative assistant provide support for student athletes and<br />

coaches.<br />

Freshmen level teams have been added in women’s volleyball, and men’s<br />

and women’s soccer, allowing more students access to participation in<br />

organized athletics. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd offers competitive varsity level sports<br />

in which student athletes can excel, and provides teams accessible to<br />

many levels of participants, supporting a philosophy of inclusion.<br />

In support of student academic success, some athletic teams require<br />

students to attend mandatory study halls during MP or after school.<br />

Coaches regularly monitor academic progress through student interaction<br />

and Power<strong>School</strong>®. These practices support the school’s Mission and<br />

Philosophy to support the development of the whole person.<br />

Student athletes develop their leadership skills through participation in<br />

programs such as Positive Coaching Alliance and the Athletic Department<br />

Leadership Retreat. Team participation in community service is<br />

encouraged, and aligned with the Service Learning Program. Teams<br />

participate in spiritual growth through prayer before games, after practices,<br />

and team prayer services, thus supporting student connection to team and<br />

God. While all coaches receive considerable support from the Athletic<br />

Department, on­campus coaches benefit daily from emotional and spiritual<br />

support from the faculty and administration. Consequently, more oncampus<br />

coaches would facilitate student connectedness in the classroom<br />

and on the field.<br />

The Athletic Department has engaged in a number of initiatives to<br />

strengthen alignment of the athletic program’s mission with the Mission of<br />

the school. The Athletic Department hosted a coaching workshop entitled<br />

Mission and Coaching in a Catholic <strong>School</strong>. The Religious Studies<br />

Department sponsored three evening discussion groups based on<br />

Leading with your Heart. The Assistant Athletic Director maintains a<br />

Blackboard® course in which coaches can collaborate, share best<br />

practices, and continue to develop as leaders. This professional growth<br />

opportunity serves to increase the development of student leaders of<br />

competence, conscience, and compassion. The Athletic Department’s<br />

commitment to on­going professional development is commendable and a<br />

strength of the Athletic Program.<br />

Co­curricular Student Involvement<br />

Student connectedness is in evidence through a variety of curricular and<br />

co­curricular opportunities. These opportunities provide an additional level<br />

of student involvement. For example, drama and art students participate<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

89


annually in drama competitions and productions, as well as in school and<br />

community sponsored art shows. Students in the Producing the Play and<br />

Introduction to Technology courses provide support to students and staff<br />

by sharing their developing skills. The Peer Homework Support Program<br />

offers 50 trained student tutors for student support before, during, and<br />

after school. AP Environmental Science students educate the community<br />

about conservation and recycling as well as maintaining and updating the<br />

school’s Living Laboratory. The extension of classroom curriculum into a<br />

broader context connects students to their peers, the school, and the<br />

greater community. In the 2006 student survey, 82% of students agree<br />

that the Fine Arts Department provides a quality program. Formal and<br />

informal interviews indicate that the co­curricular component promotes a<br />

sense of community and school pride.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. In the spring of 2007, the Counseling Department introduced<br />

Naviance®, an on­line college application and career planning system.<br />

Counselors and religion teachers redesigned the college planning<br />

process, incorporating Naviance® as an essential component in the<br />

college process.<br />

2. Parents of freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors are invited to<br />

attend evening workshops on a variety of topics of interest to parents<br />

in support of student success.<br />

3. The recent introduction of Power<strong>School</strong>® to the school community<br />

allows students, parents, teachers, administration, and coaches realtime<br />

access to records, which promotes student self­advocacy and<br />

responsibility.<br />

4. Students are supported academically through a variety of programs<br />

including tutorial support through Dragon Success, Academic Support<br />

Center, Peer Homework Support, Title I tutoring, and strong academic<br />

probation monitoring.<br />

5. The Director of Learning Needs provides educational counseling and<br />

intervention, teacher professional development, and parent education<br />

opportunities.<br />

6. <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> supports over 50 active clubs and student<br />

organizations that are open to any student.<br />

7. Freshmen level teams have been added in women’s volleyball and<br />

men’s and women’s soccer, allowing more students access to<br />

participation in organized athletics.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

90


8. The Athletic Department’s commitment to on­going professional<br />

development is commendable and a strength of the Athletic Program.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Teacher referrals<br />

· Student logs<br />

· Parent phone call logs<br />

· CPS reports<br />

· Student survey<br />

· Power<strong>School</strong>® records<br />

· Academic probation contracts<br />

· Academic probation progress reports<br />

· Student log entries<br />

· Agenda for transfer student meetings<br />

· Parent orientation letter<br />

· Follow­up responses<br />

· Athletic Department Mission statement<br />

· Athletic Department Handbook<br />

· Student/Parent Athletic Handbook<br />

· Coach evaluations<br />

· Club/moderator binder<br />

· Club applications and charters,<br />

· Club rosters<br />

· Spirit Week evaluations<br />

· Leadership training agenda<br />

· Counselor blue sheet referral forms<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Evaluate the scope of counseling services and necessary resources<br />

required in order to provide support for all students in the areas of<br />

academic, personal, and college/career counseling through<br />

communication and partnerships with students, faculty, and parents.<br />

Rationale: The Counseling Department needs to ensure that they<br />

have adequate resources to support student achievement and<br />

effectively communicate with parents.<br />

2. Develop processes to evaluate the effectiveness and available<br />

resources of all academic support services.<br />

Rationale: Currently the Dragon Success Program is limited to serving<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

91


approximately 60 students and has a wait list. Evaluating strategies for<br />

extending these services is essential.<br />

3. Analyze the effectiveness of student leadership opportunities and cocurricular<br />

activities.<br />

Rationale: Student Surveys indicate a need for a stronger presence<br />

and opportunities for student leadership.<br />

4. Evaluate the freshmen and transfer student orientation programs<br />

throughout the first year.<br />

Rationale: There is a need to enhance the freshman and transfer<br />

student orientation in order to further ensure student connectedness<br />

into the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd community.<br />

5. Develop a process for recruiting more on­campus coaches with the<br />

goal of facilitating more effective student connectedness in the<br />

classroom and on the field.<br />

Rationale: On­campus faculty benefit from daily support and<br />

professional growth opportunities that directly affect the studentathlete.<br />

6. Implement an evaluation process of school­wide events in order to<br />

attract and involve a larger number of students.<br />

Rationale: Student surveys indicate that the school needs to provide<br />

additional opportunities for student involvement.<br />

“The extra curricular activities are amazing.”<br />

– Student Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

92


C3. Parent/Community Involvement<br />

To what extent does the school leadership employ a wide range of<br />

strategies to ensure that parental and community involvement is<br />

integral to the school’s established support system for students?<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> “is a partnership of students, staff, parents,<br />

the community, and the Diocese of Oakland.” <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

recognizes the importance of the relationship between student success<br />

and the active involvement of parents and the community at large. Parent<br />

involvement is abundant and wide­ranging, and the communication<br />

between the school and parents is excellent. The school is extremely<br />

appreciative of the tremendous efforts of parents who have been<br />

exceedingly generous with both their time and financial support. This<br />

involvement depends on a system of communications that reaches as<br />

many elements of the parent community and the greater community as<br />

possible. The leadership in the school has set in place a wide range of<br />

strategies to accomplish this purpose.<br />

Communication<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> communicates to all constituencies through a<br />

variety of media throughout the year. For example, mailings and<br />

publications during the year provide parents with tools to navigate their<br />

student’s time at the school. These include the Course Catalog, student<br />

registration materials, the Student Directory, the monthly Dragon Parent,<br />

and the Dragon alumni magazine. Additionally, the school also leverages<br />

technology to keep parents informed. Ninety­two percent of parents<br />

strongly agreed or agreed that they are well informed of school events,<br />

activities, and major policy changes. The <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

website is one resource where parents can access calendars, bell<br />

schedules, and many academic and extracurricular resources. Parents<br />

also receive weekly e­News with information regarding school­wide<br />

achievements and up­coming events. The hiring of a full­time publicist and<br />

webmaster/graphic designer has provided the resources to update the<br />

web page and other publications more regularly. Feedback on the<br />

introduction of the expanded parent and alumni publications as well as<br />

web resources and the weekly e­News has been positive. Additionally, an<br />

electronic phone and e­mail communication system has been<br />

implemented to allow broadcast messages to be sent to constituencies<br />

automatically.<br />

Furthermore, the addition of grade­level parent groups has significantly<br />

added to the parent support and communication efforts of the school.<br />

Organized by the Parent Association, these support groups have<br />

organized grade­level e­mail groups and special events in order to<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

93


improve communication and to support the needs of different parent level<br />

groups. Special e­announcements also inform the student body parents or<br />

the parents of a particular class. Finally, the community at large can read<br />

about events and accomplishments of the community at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong><br />

<strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> through the many newspaper stories that report on the<br />

school.<br />

Formal and informal interviews with parents indicate that parents feel<br />

more informed on some areas of the school than others. While<br />

communication between the school and parents has improved, the school<br />

Mission still needs to be communicated more clearly, and parents need to<br />

be increasingly engaged as partners in helping students achieve all school<br />

outcomes.<br />

Parent Volunteering, Leadership, and Fundraising<br />

The parent community provides a supportive, collaborative partnership<br />

with the school in the spiritual, intellectual, and personal growth of<br />

students. The Parent Association provides the school with hospitality for<br />

many school functions that include monthly teacher/staff treats, the Senior<br />

Mass reception, and the Freshman Barbeque. They also provide staffing<br />

for Open House and parent workshop evenings. The Parent Association is<br />

responsible for parent education and hosts monthly general meetings for<br />

parents. They work with the school to organize the Teen Challenge<br />

meetings and to present Every 15 Minutes, an alcohol education program.<br />

The fall auction is the largest fundraising event sponsored by the Parent<br />

Association. This event involves hundreds of parents who donate time,<br />

products, and money. Parent involvement is also integral to the annual<br />

Golf Tournament. The parents enthusiastically support co­curricular<br />

activities, as evidenced by their financial generosity and strong attendance<br />

at sporting events, fine arts performances, and various club events.<br />

Broadening the base of parent involvement and support in all these areas<br />

would enhance the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd community and contribute to the<br />

greater success of these events. The expansion of the leadership role and<br />

volunteer opportunities for parents at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd continues to be an<br />

area of growth.<br />

Academics<br />

In order to support the students in becoming academic achievers, the<br />

leadership of the school, along with the teachers, work diligently to<br />

communicate with the parents and keep them informed about the<br />

academic progress of their student. Parents are invited to attend Open<br />

House, Back to <strong>School</strong> Night, and Parent/Teacher/Student Conferences.<br />

A variety of educational programs such as the Teen Challenge sessions<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

94


and a parent workshop series for the individual grade levels are offered to<br />

parents.<br />

Teachers interface with parents on a daily basis. Teachers use<br />

Blackboard® to post lessons and homework easily accessible to their<br />

students and hence to the parents as well. Teachers communicate with<br />

parents via voice­mail and e­mail. In support of parent and student<br />

involvement in learning, Power<strong>School</strong>® enables students and parents to<br />

access student grades on­line.<br />

Athletics<br />

The Athletic Department at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> brings parents<br />

and the community at large together in multiple ways. The many sports<br />

events find parents, alumni, and fans supporting teams. The primary<br />

parent volunteer group is Friends of the Dragon. This group engages<br />

volunteers to run various snack bars and identifies that every team has a<br />

team parent whose job description includes helping with the teams preseason<br />

meeting, organization of team dinners and post­season awards,<br />

promotes alumni games, and communicates with the rest of the parents<br />

on the team in terms of schedules, etc. The group also engages in social<br />

fundraising activities such as the Crab Feed and Dragon Ticket program.<br />

The events to which the parents are invited include the Sports Faire for<br />

incoming freshmen, Back to <strong>School</strong> Night, pre­season team parent<br />

information meetings, Open House, College Recruiting Night, team<br />

dinners, end of season banquets/awards ceremonies and college signing<br />

reception. Coaching in­services such as Coaching for Character and<br />

Coaching in a Catholic <strong>School</strong> are open to both parents and the public.<br />

Parents are kept informed through the Athletics Department’s website,<br />

direct mailings, phone trees, team information sheets, and contact<br />

information/web links. Student and parent e­mails are available to the<br />

Athletic Department, athletic trainers, coaches, and team parents.<br />

Fine Arts<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> offers parents and the community many<br />

opportunities to experience the creativity and love of the arts with their<br />

high school students. Parents can enjoy several symphonic band and jazz<br />

concerts throughout the year are also invited to the plays to watch their<br />

students provoke critical thinking and analysis through the stories played<br />

out on the stage. In the visual arts department, parents are welcome to<br />

see their students articulate ideas clearly and creatively through their oncampus<br />

displays and spring art show. Parents can volunteer to help in the<br />

box office for the drama productions and in costuming, yet unlike athletics,<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

95


fine arts has no official parent group. This type of official parent support<br />

group is something to consider for the future.<br />

Alumni Support and Involvement<br />

Through The Dragon, the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd alumni magazine, alumni are<br />

informed of events and changes at the school. The Dragon also includes<br />

articles on featured alumni, as well as sections chronicling other alumni<br />

updates. Furthermore, the Director of Alumni publishes and updates the<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd website with the latest alumni events and information.<br />

With the assistance of the Alumni Board, the Director of Alumni plans and<br />

coordinates annual fundraising events, solicitations, and reunions. Annual<br />

events include an Alumni reunion for many of the sports programs on<br />

campus. The <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd alumni are a rich source of data regarding<br />

academic preparation and whether school ESLRs are being met.<br />

Additional alumni data should be gathered and analyzed.<br />

Community Involvement<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd is blessed with many opportunities to enrich its curricula<br />

with resources beyond the classroom, providing numerous community<br />

resources and outreach programs that enhance the educational<br />

experience of all our students. For example, Career Day brings to campus<br />

professionals from nearly 40 career fields who make presentations to our<br />

students. Many of these professionals are alumni, and all generously<br />

donate their time. In addition, faculty members routinely include guest<br />

speakers in their courses, capitalizing upon the vast reservoir of<br />

knowledge and experience that resides beyond the school walls. In the<br />

area of student health and safety, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd takes advantage of<br />

numerous community resources. Every 15 Minutes is a two­day program<br />

that challenges high school students to reflect upon the dire risks of<br />

drinking and driving and to consider their responsibility for making mature<br />

decisions that potentially affect family, friends, and many others.<br />

Partnership with AIM HIGH has enabled <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd to invite middle<br />

school students on campus for tutoring and summer growth opportunities<br />

that provides important community outreach by serving middle school<br />

students from Oakland and surrounding communities. The Key Club<br />

participates in a number of volunteer opportunities including tutoring and<br />

mentoring young students at REACH Academy serving students in the<br />

immediate neighborhood of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd. The need to explore<br />

additional areas of community outreach is an area of growth.<br />

In an effort to promote better relations, security at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> interfaces with parents, the neighborhood, and the community at<br />

large on a daily basis. They alert neighbors to major on­campus events<br />

that may impact parking and traffic.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

96


Facilities<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>, through a philosophy of serving a diverse<br />

range of students in Oakland and surrounding communities, allows<br />

facilities to be rented, and by doing so, creates stronger ties with the<br />

community at large. The facilities, are rented to such groups as Aim <strong>High</strong>,<br />

Conservatory Ballet, CYO: Catholic Elementary <strong>School</strong>s, Diocese of<br />

Oakland, Lillian Black Art Festival, SAT Prep Class, Institute of Reading<br />

and Development, Kids Take the Stage, Jack London Youth Soccer Club,<br />

Positive Coaching Alliance, Oakland Little League, Oakland Unified<br />

<strong>School</strong> District, California Youth Soccer Olympic Development Program,<br />

Oakland Raiderettes, Team East Oakland, Toler Heights Community<br />

Association, and Triple Threat Academy.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> communicates to all constituencies<br />

through a variety of media throughout the year.<br />

2. The hiring of a full­time publicist and webmaster/graphic designer has<br />

provided the resources to update the web page and other publications<br />

more regularly.<br />

3. Parents provide <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> with countless hours of<br />

volunteer service, leadership, and fundraising efforts each year.<br />

4. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd is able to provide our students numerous community<br />

resources and outreach opportunities that enhance the educational<br />

experience of all our students.<br />

5. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>, through a philosophy of serving the<br />

diverse range of students in Oakland and surrounding communities,<br />

rents facilities to the larger community on a regular basis.<br />

Evidence<br />

· The <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd website<br />

· The Course Catalog<br />

· Student registration materials<br />

· The Student Directory<br />

· The monthly Dragon Parent<br />

· The Dragon alumni magazine<br />

· The E­News<br />

· Parent survey results<br />

· Grade level parent feedback<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

97


· Parent Home Group report<br />

· Parent Association records<br />

· Parent Association volunteer hours<br />

· Every 15 Minutes parent summary<br />

· Parent Association auction results<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>School</strong> Calendar for events such as:<br />

o Open House<br />

o Back to <strong>School</strong> Night<br />

o Parent/Teacher/Student Conferences<br />

o Teen Challenge Sessions<br />

o Parent Workshop Series<br />

· Blackboard®<br />

· PowerGrade/Power<strong>School</strong>®<br />

· Phone­tree data<br />

· Team information sheets<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd planner<br />

· Fine Arts Department pictures and videos of events<br />

· Trophies<br />

· Drama Department spreadsheet of parent volunteers<br />

· Business Office facilities schedule database<br />

· Summer school files<br />

· Key Club records and calendar of events<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Evaluate strategies for continuing to communicate with all<br />

constituencies.<br />

Rationale: The school continues to explore new ways of leveraging<br />

state of the art technology in order to improve communication with<br />

parents, students, alumni, and community.<br />

2. Analyze Power<strong>School</strong>® data in order to continue to better serve the<br />

needs of students.<br />

Rationale: Since introducing Power<strong>School</strong>® to parents and students in<br />

January 2007, accessibility to grades, improved accuracy, and timely<br />

accounting has significantly contributed to supporting student<br />

achievement. Continued evaluation of Power<strong>School</strong>® data is critical.<br />

3. Explore strategies for expanding the leadership role and volunteer<br />

opportunities for parents and alumni at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd.<br />

Rationale: Parents and alumni are key contributors to the success of<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> and their potential has yet to be realized.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

98


4. Systematically gather and analyze alumni data.<br />

Rationale: The school needs to continue to evaluate effective<br />

database systems in order to efficiently track and reconnect alumni.<br />

5. Explore additional areas of community outreach.<br />

Rationale: Increased visibility within the community benefits the school<br />

and helps our students achieve the ESLRs.<br />

6. Investigate strategies for implementing additional parent support<br />

groups.<br />

Rationale: The Friends of the Dragon organization has been so<br />

successful in supporting the Athletic Department, the school would<br />

benefit from using that model to support other school programs.<br />

“The Dragon and the O’Dowd on­line newsletter keeps us informed<br />

with all that is happening at O’Dowd”<br />

– Alumni Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

99


D1. Resources<br />

Category D: Resource Management and Development<br />

To what extent does the school demonstrate responsible<br />

stewardship? To what extent are the resources available to the<br />

school sufficient to sustain the school program and effectively used<br />

to carry out the school’s Philosophy and Mission and student<br />

achievement of the ESLRs.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd demonstrates responsible stewardship of its resources in<br />

a variety of ways. A number of groups and committees are responsible for<br />

financial decisions that guide the school. The Board of Regents meets<br />

monthly, but individual members work effectively in their roles within<br />

various subcommittees. The Finance and Audit Committees work with<br />

school personnel to guide and advise the school in their areas of<br />

expertise. Internally, the school has a variety of groups in place to set and<br />

review financial policy and process, including Executive Council, Directors’<br />

Council, and Buildings & Grounds.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd has the resources to sustain the school program and<br />

effectively carry out its Mission. The school has a steady increase in net<br />

assets from $4,002,000 as of June 30, 2004, to $6,908,000 as of February<br />

28, 2007. The 2005­2006 audit reflects total income of $14,053,000 as of<br />

June 30, 2006, and expenses of $12,196,000, a net increase of<br />

$1,857,000 in net assets. Currently the school has approximately<br />

$2,000,000 in board restricted funds, $750,000 in restricted scholarship<br />

endowment funds and $1,500,000 in unrestricted savings. The school<br />

budget produces a positive cash flow annually, even though it includes in<br />

excess of $1Million per year for capital improvements. According to the<br />

faculty survey, 70% of faculty feel that they are kept informed of the school<br />

budget and finances. Creating processes for more effective<br />

communication with faculty regarding budget and finances is a school<br />

growth area.<br />

Responsible stewardship of the school’s assets begins with an oversight<br />

process. At <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>, oversight begins with a detailed<br />

monthly review of the actual financial results, completion of an updated<br />

financial forecast for the entire budget year, and a comparison of the<br />

forecast with the budget. Department chairs receive a report each month<br />

listing their current expenses and balance. The updated financial<br />

statements, including the updated forecast, are distributed to the Board<br />

Finance Committee, Superintendent of <strong>School</strong>s, and the Chief Financial<br />

Officer of the Diocese, as well as key school administrators.<br />

The school purchasing policy requires preparation of a purchase order for<br />

all purchases over $500. The purchase order must be approved by the<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

100<br />

September 22, 2007


Department Chair and the Business Office, verifying that the purchase is<br />

in compliance with the department budget. Employees who collect checks<br />

and cash on behalf of the school must follow the procedures that require<br />

timely deposit of all monies in the Business Office. Events generating<br />

funds such as plays and athletic events, must use tickets or attendee<br />

record slips.<br />

The tuition collection policy requires a signed contract by all<br />

parents/guardians. Tuition arrears have been minimal over the last four<br />

years as a result of constant communication by the Business Office. The<br />

success rate for tuition collection has exceeded 99% during the last four<br />

years.<br />

Year Collected Tuition (%)<br />

2002­03 99.98%<br />

2003­04 99.97%<br />

2004­05 100.00%<br />

2005­06 99.96%<br />

A number of programs have been implemented by the school to help<br />

reduce their environmental footprint. Utility usage, both electricity and<br />

natural gas, is carefully tracked to establish whether or not energy<br />

reduction programs implemented by the school have been successful. The<br />

evidence contains 5­year summaries of electricity and natural gas usage<br />

that illustrate that there has been reduction in utility usage. A recycling<br />

program has saved the school approximately $30,000 a year for the last<br />

five years and reduced our impact on the environment.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> consists of twelve permanent buildings, nine<br />

of which were constructed in the early 1950s, one “temporary” classroom<br />

building, three storage sheds, two large athletic fields, a track, parking for<br />

300, and a Living Laboratory. The school’s facilities are adequate to<br />

provide a college preparatory curriculum and participation in many extracurricular<br />

activities and interscholastic athletics. However, many of the<br />

school’s buildings are over 50 years old and in need of maintenance.<br />

Additionally, with the school’s increased enrollment there is no place on<br />

campus for the entire school to gather. The school needs to evaluate its<br />

existing facilities to develop a Master Facilities Plan for future growth.<br />

One of the most important resources of the school is the faculty and staff.<br />

The school shows its commitment to the faculty and staff in a variety of<br />

ways, including supporting the professional and spiritual growth of all<br />

employees. According to the faculty surveys, 88% believe the school<br />

administration supports the professional development of faculty through<br />

allocation of release time and resources. Ninety­one percent indicate that<br />

there is sufficient support and encouragement for their academic growth.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

101


Areas of Strength<br />

1. The faculty and staff are the school’s greatest strength.<br />

2. The school has a sound financial base.<br />

3. The school engages in regular financial reporting and review.<br />

4. The Finance and Audit Committees work with school personnel to<br />

guide and advise the school in their areas of expertise.<br />

5. The school budget produces a positive cash flow annually.<br />

6. Consistent and planned oversight of spending is an area of strength.<br />

Evidence<br />

· <strong>School</strong> budget<br />

· <strong>School</strong> financial report – 5 years (2002­03 to 2006­07)<br />

· Monthly financial reporting to department heads<br />

· Department budget worksheets<br />

· Finance committee meeting minutes<br />

· Cash handling procedures – including forms used and event<br />

ticketing<br />

· Business policies & accounting practices<br />

· Purchasing procedures<br />

· Tuition history<br />

· Annual report<br />

· Tuition collection policy & results<br />

· Tuition comparison with other Catholic/private schools<br />

· Financial aid policy/procedures<br />

· Financial aid history, including applications/need/grants<br />

· Financial aid comparison with other Catholic schools<br />

· Facilities maintenance procedures<br />

· Capital budgeting procedures<br />

· Capital projects history – 5 years<br />

· Utility usages (electricity, natural gas, water)<br />

· Master facility plan<br />

· 5­Year financial plan<br />

· Reserve study – an analysis of the current condition of all school<br />

assets, their current remaining life, and the cost to replace them<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

102


Areas of Growth<br />

1. Evaluate the school’s existing facilities in order to develop a Master<br />

Facilities Plan for future growth.<br />

Rationale: A Master Facilities Plan must be developed in order to<br />

address the current educational needs.<br />

2. Improve communication with the faculty regarding school finances.<br />

Rationale: To achieve transparency regarding all aspects of school<br />

operations with stakeholders, processes need to be implemented to<br />

improve communication and education.<br />

“Three areas of strength are their sports in general.<br />

Also, their drama department and technology department.”<br />

– Student Survey<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

103


D2. Resource Planning<br />

To what extent do the governing authority and the school execute<br />

responsible resource planning for the future?<br />

Responsible resource planning is executed at all levels, from the Board of<br />

Regents and school administrators, to faculty and staff.<br />

The school prepares its annual budget with the collaboration of the faculty,<br />

administration, and Board of Regents. Every Department Chair receives a<br />

budget worksheet prepared especially for his/her department. It<br />

summarizes the previous year’s actual expenses in his/her department<br />

and presents the current year approved budget detail. The Principal and<br />

the Assistant Principals are given the budget planning documents for<br />

Instructional Expense and Administration. A preliminary budget is<br />

prepared from the individual budget worksheets.<br />

Once the preliminary budget is completed, it is submitted to the Principal<br />

and the President for their initial review. Next, it is submitted to the Board<br />

of Regents Finance Committee. At this stage of the budget process,<br />

several budget models are prepared using key variables such as tuition<br />

and faculty/administration pay increases. Once the Finance Committee<br />

approves the school budget, it is submitted to the full Board of Regents<br />

(usually at the February board meeting) for approval by the full board.<br />

Upon budget approval, copies of each department’s budget are given<br />

back to the departments. This collaborative budgeting process fosters<br />

transparency and ownership of the budget by individual stakeholders.<br />

The school has a standing Buildings & Grounds Committee as well as a<br />

Regent Committee of the same name. The school committee, comprised<br />

of five administrators, meets twice a month to discuss various projects,<br />

problems, and concerns. The school committee not only functions to point<br />

out problems, but is also responsible for approving any capital expenditure<br />

over $1,000. The Regents Committee is then responsible for approving<br />

any expenditure over $10,000. This is also a part of the budget planning<br />

process.<br />

Progress on the development of a long­term Master Facilities Plan was<br />

initiated in fall 2006. Working in collaboration with the <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong><br />

planning process, a wide range of stakeholders contributed to the ongoing<br />

evaluation of the school facilities and resources. Additionally, work<br />

has begun on a 5­year financial plan to identify the financial resources<br />

necessary to implement the master facilities plan.<br />

Under the direction of the Buildings & Grounds committees of the Board of<br />

Regents and the school, a Reserve Replacement Study was completed<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

104


which looked at all of the school’s physical assets and estimated the cost<br />

of maintaining and/or replacing them over the next 20+ years. This study<br />

estimated that the school will need approximately $7.8 million over the<br />

next 20 years to maintain its current assets. The study further<br />

recommended that the school start budgeting $200,000 a year for capital<br />

asset replacement. The school’s current year budget includes<br />

approximately $750,000 for capital asset replacement.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. The collaborative budgeting process fosters transparency and<br />

ownership of the budget by individual stakeholders.<br />

2. The school prepares its annual budget with the collaboration of the<br />

faculty, administration, and Board of Regents.<br />

3. The Buildings & Grounds, Development, and the Finance Committees<br />

of the Board of Regents actively participate in planning for the school.<br />

4. The school’s current year budget includes approximately $750,000 for<br />

capital asset replacement.<br />

Evidence<br />

· <strong>School</strong> Budget<br />

· Strategic Plan<br />

· Master Facility Plan<br />

· 5­Year Financial Plan<br />

· 2006 Reserve Study<br />

· Board of Regents Meeting Minutes<br />

Area of Growth<br />

1. Identify the financial resources necessary to implement the master<br />

facilities plan.<br />

Rationale: Systematic planning to identify and obtain financial<br />

resources must begin in order to implement the master facilities plan.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

105


D3. <strong>School</strong> Finance Resources<br />

To what extent are the school’s financial resources adequate to fulfill<br />

its mission and programs? To what extent are the school’s financial<br />

operations conducted with integrity and in accordance with<br />

acceptable accounting practices?<br />

The school has a solid financial condition and constantly strives to ensure<br />

its future financial stability. To meet the needs of its students now and in<br />

the future, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd must maintain a fiscally sound position to do<br />

the following:<br />

· Keep tuition affordable<br />

· Provide funds for financial assistance<br />

· Attract and retain committed and qualified administration,<br />

faculty, and staff<br />

· Provide for capital improvements<br />

· Maintain the school’s competitive edge<br />

· Support the fast­changing academic tools and programs<br />

students require<br />

In the last ten years, tuition has more than doubled. For the 1994­95<br />

school year tuition was $4,950. In 2006­07, tuition was $11,200. Tuition<br />

increases have ranged from a low of 3.1% in 1998­99 to a high of 12.7%<br />

in 2004­05 (See Appendix D). <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd currently provides tuition<br />

assistance at the level of 87% of verified need with a goal of keeping the<br />

school available to any qualified student by providing 100% of verifiable<br />

tuition need.<br />

Year Aid Granted As A Percentage Of Actual Need (%)<br />

2002­03 64%<br />

2003­04 62%<br />

2004­05 76%<br />

2005­06 86%<br />

2006­07 87%<br />

Approximately 7.7%, or over a million dollars, of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s<br />

operating budget funds tuition assistance as compared with the 8.6%<br />

spent on tuition assistance by other Catholic high schools. Survey data<br />

from 30 Catholic high schools in Northern California illustrates that <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is comparable with other Catholic high schools in the<br />

area. Data also illustrates that <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd relies too heavily on<br />

operating budget for its tuition assistance, funding (84%) compared to the<br />

other Catholic high schools (average 42%), with strong percentage of<br />

schools receiving all of their aid funds from scholarship endowments. In<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

106


light of increasing costs, the need for tuition assistance will continue to<br />

grow. If the school is to keep tuition affordable, the endowment must be<br />

increased to supplement the tuition assistance program. The school needs<br />

to develop and implement a strategy for growing its endowment. An area<br />

of growth is to analyze data and identify additional sources of tuition<br />

assistance funding.<br />

The Business Office supervises the day­to­day business of <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd’s finances. Monthly updates, including a financial forecast for the<br />

year, are issued to the President, Principal, Finance Committee, and<br />

Diocesan offices. All financial operations are conducted with integrity and<br />

in accordance with accepted accounting procedures. An independent<br />

accounting firm conducts an annual audit of the school’s financial<br />

statements. The auditor’s procedures include tests of documentary<br />

evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, tests of the<br />

physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of receivables,<br />

assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected customers,<br />

creditors, and banks. The auditors request written representations from<br />

the school’s attorneys as part of the engagement. At the conclusion of the<br />

audit, the auditors also request certain written representations from the<br />

school about financial statements and related matters.<br />

The auditors then publish a detailed financial audit report. The school’s<br />

most recent audit report states, “In our opinion, the financial statements<br />

referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial<br />

position of <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> as of June 30, 2006 and 2005,<br />

and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years then<br />

ended, in conformity with accounting Principals generally accepted in the<br />

United States of America.”<br />

The auditors issue an Annual Management Letter which presents<br />

recommendations to the school to build and improve on current<br />

procedures for financial controls. Working closely with the Finance<br />

Committee of the Board of Regents, the school routinely implements its<br />

auditor’s recommendations. Audit recommendations implemented over the<br />

past few years have included policies and procedures regarding the<br />

opening of new bank accounts, vendor contracting policies with approval<br />

levels, regular review of pledge receivables and periodic write­offs when<br />

appropriate, monthly journal entry reviews, and review of department<br />

budgets. Some of the auditors’ recommendations still need to be<br />

implemented, including completing an inventory of all fixed assets and<br />

implementing a written salary administration policy and procedures.<br />

The Office of Institutional Advancement records all contributions and<br />

donations. All funds are processed through the Business Office, and the<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

107


Business Office verifies all deposits. The Office of Institutional<br />

Advancement does not hold any funds on hand.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. The current tuition assistance program awards nearly $1,000,000<br />

annually.<br />

2. Annual audits are conducted by an independent accounting firm.<br />

Evidence<br />

· <strong>School</strong> budget<br />

· Investment allocation & cash resources – 5 year history<br />

· <strong>School</strong> financial report – 5 years (2002­03 to 2006­07)<br />

· Finance committee meeting agendas<br />

· Outside audits<br />

· Tuition history<br />

· Tuition collection policy<br />

· Tuition collection results – 5 years<br />

· Financial aid policy/procedures<br />

· Financial aid history, including applications/need/grants – 5 years<br />

· Financial aid history, as a percentage of school total expenses – 5<br />

years<br />

· Financial aid comparison with other private/Catholic high schools<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Develop and implement a strategy for increasing the school’s<br />

endowment.<br />

Rationale: Currently, a significant percentage of the school’s operating<br />

budget is devoted to providing tuition assistance. Development of a<br />

strong endowment fund is essential to release operating funds for use<br />

on other critical school needs.<br />

2. Develop and implement strategies to limit tuition increases.<br />

Rationale: In keeping with the Mission of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>,<br />

the school is committed to keeping its tuition affordable for all families.<br />

3. Gather and disaggregate data to identify additional sources of tuition<br />

assistance funding.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

108


Rationale: Building a strong endowment takes considerable time and<br />

resources. The school must identify alternate sources of funding in the<br />

interim.<br />

4. Review auditor reports annually and implement the recommendations<br />

as appropriate.<br />

Rationale: <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> needs to demonstrate fiscal<br />

responsibility to all stakeholders.<br />

“We have wonderful counselors whom really make us<br />

feel like we matter in the O’Dowd community.”<br />

– Student Surveys<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

109


D4. Enrollment Resources<br />

To what extent are the school’s admissions policies and procedures<br />

consistent with its philosophy? To what extent are the school’s<br />

marketing, recruitment and public relations efforts effective in<br />

attracting qualified students? To what extent is enrollment targeted<br />

to maintain effective and meaningful curricular and co­curricular<br />

programs that meet the philosophy and goal expectations of the<br />

school?<br />

The school’s admission policies and procedures are consistent with the<br />

Philosophy of the school. It is the school’s Philosophy to provide an<br />

integrated academic, spiritual, and extra­curricular college preparatory<br />

education that develops “…exemplary graduates who by their lives enrich<br />

society with Gospel values … While preference is given to Catholics,<br />

enrollment is open to students of all faiths who embrace our philosophy<br />

and are willing to contribute to it.” As a result, application for admission is<br />

open to all students who have successfully completed the eighth grade.<br />

Academic readiness represents the initial criterion of the admissions<br />

process. In reviewing applications, the Admissions Review Committee<br />

considers <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> Placement Test (HSPT) results, junior high grades,<br />

principal and teacher recommendations, and student essay in its<br />

assessment of eligibility. Students achieving below grade level or below<br />

the 50 th percentile on the HSPT are accepted to <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> conditionally, pending successful completion of summer school.<br />

Beyond academic readiness, demonstrated openness of the applicant and<br />

family to the spiritual dimension of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is<br />

essential for a successful applicant. A favorable recommendation from<br />

clergy, outlining a desire to participate in the spiritual dimension of the<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> community, is also required.<br />

Another vital aspect of the school’s Philosophy is its commitment to and<br />

celebration of diversity. The school “…challenges and encourages all<br />

members of its community to be loving and rejoice in their diversity.” This<br />

commitment is reflected through admissions in a variety of ways. For<br />

example, for 2007­08 <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> budgeted $1.2 million<br />

in tuition assistance with the goal of attracting and supporting a broader<br />

socio­economic base of students. With regard to religious diversity, the<br />

2006­07 student body reflects approximately 55% Catholics and 45% non­<br />

Catholics. Our admissions process welcomes students of all faiths with the<br />

understanding that such enrollment nurtures religious diversity, allowing<br />

students to grow in their own spiritual faiths. Ninety­three percent of<br />

parents state that the school admits a diverse student body and makes all<br />

students feel a welcome part of the community, and 95% of teachers<br />

welcome the opportunity to teach a diverse student body.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

110


Of the 1161 students enrolled in the 2006­07 school year, approximately<br />

530 come from a Catholic school background, 238 from a nondenominational<br />

private school background, and 380 from a public school<br />

background.<br />

In fall 2005, the administration established new marketing procedures and<br />

policies in order to attract and enroll new students. These efforts included<br />

revised marketing collateral, updated website information, an expanded<br />

range of feeder school presentations, redesigned campus visits to include<br />

parents, and a restructured Open House event. Additionally, personal<br />

contacts to key support schools were initiated by the President and<br />

Principal. An annual articulation meeting with elementary school principals<br />

and teachers launched in fall 2006.<br />

The school’s admissions marketing, recruitment, and public relations<br />

efforts have attracted a growing number of qualified applicants. The<br />

school received over 600 freshman applicants in 2005­06. This represents<br />

a 22% increase from the previous admissions calendar year. While<br />

marketing efforts have been successful in increasing the number of new<br />

student and transfer applications, strategies must be developed to analyze<br />

the relative effectiveness of marketing, recruitment, and public relations<br />

efforts. In addition, changing demographics in Oakland and the East Bay<br />

Area may result in a decline in the number of high school­age students.<br />

Consequently, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> must continue to analyze<br />

population data and implement additional recruitment strategies to attract<br />

and retain a qualified and diverse student body. Accurate and expanded<br />

admissions record keeping is an area of growth.<br />

Admissions outreach and marketing make it clear that the excellence we<br />

seek encompasses more than academics. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

selects students from a diverse applicant pool who help sustain strong<br />

programs in all areas of the school. Academically, over 98% of <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

<strong>O'Dowd</strong> graduates enroll in colleges and universities in California and<br />

across the nation. Additionally, a vast majority of students participate in<br />

athletics, student government, clubs, activities, and the Fine and<br />

Performing Arts.<br />

Students involved in the Campus Ministry Program at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

<strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> actively demonstrate their commitment to promoting the<br />

school’s Mission and Philosophy. An average of 20 students per grade<br />

level participate in each of the ministry teams, and 100 juniors and 150<br />

seniors choose annually to participate in retreats, showing that students<br />

continue to benefit from these experiences. All students participate in<br />

monthly charitable drives and the school’s annual Mission Week.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

111


Areas of Strength<br />

1. The school’s admission policies and procedures are consistent with the<br />

Philosophy of the school.<br />

2. The school’s culture demonstrates a commitment to and celebration of<br />

diversity.<br />

3. The administration established new marketing procedures and policies<br />

in order to attract and enroll new students.<br />

4. Articulation meetings with elementary school principals and teachers<br />

designed to improve communication regarding admissions policies and<br />

practices, are held annually.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Historical records of enrollment<br />

· Diversity breakdown data<br />

· Admissions and marketing collateral materials<br />

· Past/current admission policies<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Develop effective strategies for marketing, recruitment, and public<br />

relations in the admissions process.<br />

Rationale: Consistent with the school’s Mission, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> remains committed to attracting diverse and qualified<br />

applicants.<br />

2. Analyze population data and implement additional recruitment<br />

strategies to attract and retain a qualified and diverse student body.<br />

Rationale: Due to changing demographics, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> must be diligent in understanding its applicant pool.<br />

3. Develop and implement a plan to maintain accurate admissions data.<br />

Rationale: <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> requires accurate applicant<br />

data in order to analyze trends and focus recruitment efforts.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

112


D5. Development Resources<br />

To what extent has the school an effective development/fundraising<br />

program that is consonant with the school’s philosophy? To what<br />

extent is there evidence of development planning?<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>’s Advancement program is an integral facet<br />

of the school charged with advancing the school’s Mission and Philosophy<br />

through a comprehensive program of fund development and external<br />

relations. The program is consonant with the Mission of the school through<br />

its adherence to the Council for Advancement and Support of Education<br />

(CASE) best practices, as well as the accurate and ethical representation<br />

of the school to the community.<br />

A reconfiguration of the Advancement program in 2006, consisting of a<br />

Vice President for Advancement, Director of Alumni Relations, Director of<br />

the Annual Fund, Director of Communications, Director of Planned Giving,<br />

Web Designer and Advancement Coordinator, has increased collaboration<br />

among these departments and enhanced fundraising results.<br />

Private schools traditionally charge less in tuition than the actual cost of<br />

educating each student. This sets up an inherent challenge in order to<br />

balance the school’s budget. <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> relies on<br />

fundraising to make up the difference between tuition revenue and cost of<br />

education (in 2006­07 approximately $2,000 per student), as well as to<br />

support capital improvement projects and competitive teacher salaries.<br />

In addition, a primary mission of Catholic education is to provide the<br />

opportunity for a quality education to historically underserved populations,<br />

as well as academic and spiritual nurturing to all those who are admitted.<br />

This requires substantial funding for tuition assistance to deserving<br />

students (over $1 million in 2007­08). Tuition assistance is essential to<br />

maintaining diversity at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd.<br />

In the past, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> has generally been a tuitiondependent<br />

school. In 2004­05, tuition provided almost 97% of the<br />

operating revenue. This ratio has been decreased to 92% in the current<br />

school year through growth of the school’s endowment from approximately<br />

$2 million to over $4 million. Interest revenue from the endowment<br />

supplements operating costs in the school’s budget.<br />

Total Advancement income for 2005­06 was $1.3 million. Contributing to<br />

that total were fundraising events (an auction, golf tournament, and crab<br />

feed), and donations restricted to tuition assistance, specific programs,<br />

student activities, and scholarship funds. Central to Advancement income<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

113


is the Annual Fund, which raises unrestricted operating support. In the last<br />

three years Annual Fund results have increased dramatically.<br />

Annual Fund Totals<br />

Fiscal Year 2003­04 Fiscal Year 2004­05 Fiscal Year 2005­06<br />

$133,965 $422,519 $806,205<br />

In 2004­05 <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> instituted a program through<br />

which parents commit to a multi­year pledge in support of the Annual<br />

Fund. The pledge program has positively impacted annual fundraising.<br />

Building on the success of the Annual Fund, a major gifts program has<br />

been initiated to raise both unrestricted and designated funds. The school<br />

continues to solicit grants from foundations for campus renovations and<br />

other projects. As <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> embarks upon a major<br />

capital campaign, the building blocks for success have been laid by the<br />

cultivation of donors achieved through these programs.<br />

A goal of the Advancement Program is to strengthen <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>’s relationships with various community groups and individuals in<br />

order to promote and build support for its Mission.<br />

Alumni remain the school’s constituency with the largest potential for<br />

growth in annual fundraising. A concerted effort is underway to re­connect<br />

alumni through events and communications other than solicitations.<br />

Electronic communications include an enhanced alumni on­line web­site<br />

community, and a weekly e­newsletter providing alumni the means to stay<br />

abreast of campus news and alumni events. In addition, The Dragon<br />

magazine and notification of alumni events are mailed to alumni to provide<br />

campus connection. Continued attention to alumni through nonfundraising<br />

programs re­connects them with the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

community. This reconnection aids the school outreach to alumni through<br />

peer solicitation, demonstrating <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>’s<br />

appreciation for its graduates.<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> has the benefit of two parent support<br />

organizations: the Parent Association and the Friends of the Dragon. Both<br />

organizations raise funds. Advancement must continue to assist its parent<br />

organizations in building the community and capacity to further the<br />

Mission of the school in this interconnected world.<br />

Planning is vital to the continued success of Advancement at <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

<strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>. The 2007 campaign feasibility study will help<br />

determine the school’s ability to fund its Master Facilities Plan, increase its<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

114


endowment, and provide critical information regarding prospective donor<br />

interest, capacity, and commitment. The feasibility study will result in the<br />

creation of a long­range development plan for major gifts within a capital<br />

campaign. The plan will include vision, goals, and timelines for the<br />

program.<br />

The Wayne and Gladys Valley Foundation has pledged a challenge grant<br />

to <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> in support of its 21 st Century Classroom<br />

project, Phase One of the Master Facilities Plan. Upon successful<br />

completion of the campaign feasibility study, the effort to raise funds<br />

toward the classroom project will be coordinated with major gift<br />

solicitations within the scope of the capital campaign.<br />

In addition to long­range planning, a yearly calendar of Advancement<br />

activities, including volunteer fundraising events, has been developed.<br />

Foundation and corporate grant requests, as well as planned giving<br />

efforts, are on­going. This planning contributes to the financial integrity of<br />

the school’s support organizations and ensures appropriate solicitation<br />

and stewardship of donors and their gifts.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

1. Reconfiguration of the Advancement Team in 2006 has resulted in<br />

increased collaboration, communication, and coordination.<br />

2. Increased fundraising efforts have resulted in a decrease of tuition<br />

dependency for operating revenue.<br />

Evidence<br />

· Board of Regent minutes<br />

· Audits<br />

· Financial statements<br />

· Budgets<br />

· Parent survey<br />

· Alumni survey<br />

· Feasibility study<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

1. Develop an Advancement Plan based on the 2007 feasibility study.<br />

Rationale: An Advancement Plan needs to be developed in order to<br />

fund the school’s Master Facilities Plan, increase endowment, and<br />

capitalize on information regarding prospective donor interest,<br />

capacity, and commitment.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

115


2. Strengthen <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>'s relationships with various community<br />

groups, foundations, corporations, and individuals (particularly alumni)<br />

in order to build financial support for the school’s mission.<br />

Rationale: Donations are vital to funding the programs, faculty<br />

salaries, and campus improvements necessary to fulfill the school’s<br />

mission.<br />

“It [the Peer Teacher Mentoring Program] allows for growth by both the<br />

mentor and the mentee in multiple<br />

areas of teaching as it opens opportunities<br />

for both to learn more about the profession and<br />

challenges in the classroom as well as across multiple subjects.”<br />

– Faculty Member<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

116


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007<br />

Category A: Organization for Student Learning<br />

1. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> will articulate an inspiring Catholic charism,<br />

infused in all programs, which embraces diversity through lay leadership.<br />

ESLRs Addressed: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective Communicators,<br />

Active Leaders, Responsible Global Citizens, Life­long Learners<br />

Rationale: A charism is a gift from God bestowed on one or several people as an act of<br />

grace for the reign of God. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd needs to discern and name a specific<br />

Catholic charism to help support its identity as a Catholic high school.<br />

Strategies Persons/Resources Evaluation/Timeline<br />

President, Principal, AP Campus<br />

Surveys, Agendas, Minutes<br />

Ministry, Charism Committee<br />

Identify a charism that articulates<br />

and makes memorable the core<br />

values represented in the Mission<br />

and ESLRs.<br />

Summer Grant Stipends, Charism<br />

Conferences, Meeting Time<br />

2007­2008<br />

Develop strategies for the infusion<br />

and implementation of the charism<br />

across curricular and co­curricular<br />

programs.<br />

President, Principal, AP Campus<br />

Ministry, Charism Committee<br />

Faculty in­service, <strong>School</strong> Budget, Staff<br />

Dept. Handbooks, Course<br />

Catalog, Faculty<br />

Handbook, Student Parent<br />

Handbook, Surveys<br />

2007­2009 ­ on­going<br />

Develop strategies for the infusion<br />

and implementation of the charism<br />

into all constituencies.<br />

Promote the identified charism.<br />

President, Principal, AP Campus<br />

Ministry, Charism Committee<br />

<strong>School</strong> Budget, Staff, Website,<br />

Publications<br />

President, Principal, AP Campus<br />

Ministry, Charism Committee<br />

<strong>School</strong> Budget, Staff, Website,<br />

Publications<br />

Athletics Handbook,<br />

Student Activities<br />

Handbook, Student Parent<br />

Handbook,<br />

Alumni Communications<br />

2007­2009 ­ on­going<br />

BOD Publications and<br />

Materials<br />

2008 ­ on­going<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

117


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007<br />

Category A: Organization for Student Learning<br />

2. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> will design and implement a plan to infuse the<br />

ESLRs into the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd community through the partnership of<br />

administration, faculty, staff, and parents in order to better prepare students for<br />

graduation.<br />

ESLRs Addressed: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective Communicators,<br />

Active Leaders, Responsible Global Citizens, Life­long Learners<br />

Rationale: Student achievement of ESLRs is dependent upon the ability of all<br />

stakeholders to understand thoroughly and articulate effectively the Mission of the<br />

school.<br />

Strategies Persons/Resources Evaluation/Timeline<br />

Develop a plan to raise awareness<br />

and promote ownership of the Mission,<br />

Philosophy, and ESLRs in the school.<br />

President, Principal, APs, ESLR<br />

Committee*<br />

Committee, Faculty Meeting Time<br />

Faculty, ESLR Team, Dept.<br />

Meeting Agendas and<br />

Minutes<br />

2007­ 2008<br />

Align curriculum expectations to the<br />

ESLRs.<br />

Assist teachers in incorporating the<br />

ESLRs into curriculum and instruction.<br />

Develop and implement a process for<br />

evaluating the extent to which the<br />

students are achieving the ESLRs.<br />

President, Principal, APs, Dir. of Curr. &<br />

Instr. & ESLR Committee<br />

Summer Grant Stipends, Department<br />

Meeting Time<br />

President, Principal, APs, Dir. of Curr.<br />

Instr., ESLR Committee<br />

Summer Grant Stipends, Mentor<br />

Teacher Stipends, Department Meeting<br />

Time<br />

President, Principal, APs, Dir. of Curr.<br />

Instr., ESLR Committee<br />

Staff, Class Time<br />

Dept. Handbooks, Course<br />

Catalogs, Course Syllabi,<br />

Student Work<br />

2007­ 2008<br />

Dept. Handbooks, Course<br />

Catalogs, Course Syllabi,<br />

Student Work<br />

2007 ­ on­going<br />

Course Catalogs, Course<br />

Syllabi, Student Work,<br />

Evaluations/Surveys,<br />

Department Handbooks,<br />

Senior Survey<br />

2007 ­ on­going<br />

Develop and implement a plan to raise<br />

awareness and promote ownership of<br />

the Mission, Philosophy, and ESLRs in<br />

the greater community.<br />

President, Principal, APs,<br />

VP Advancement, ESLR Committee<br />

Staff, Class Time, Website,<br />

Publications,<br />

Public Relations, <strong>School</strong> Budget<br />

BOD Publications and<br />

Materials<br />

2007­ on­going<br />

*ESLR Committee comprised of representatives of all stakeholders of the school.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

118


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007<br />

Category A: Organization for Student Learning<br />

3. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> will design and maintain a human resource plan to<br />

attract, hire, retain, and support highly qualified faculty and staff who embrace<br />

and model the Mission of the school.<br />

ESLRs Addressed: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective Communicators,<br />

Active Leaders, Responsible Global Citizens, Life­long Learners<br />

Rationale: The school needs to develop a model that contains policies and procedures<br />

to attract, retain, and support high quality administrators, faculty, and staff.<br />

Strategies Persons/Resources Evaluation/Timeline<br />

President, Principal, Staff<br />

Teacher Evaluation Tool and<br />

Committee<br />

Program<br />

Develop a consistent evaluation<br />

program for administrators, faculty,<br />

and staff.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Budget, Staff, Stipends,<br />

<strong>School</strong> Budget<br />

Fall 2007 – Fall 2008<br />

Work in partnership with the<br />

Diocese for an equitable diocesan<br />

high school salary scale, standardizing<br />

and improving <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s<br />

compensation plan for both faculty<br />

and staff.<br />

Design and implement a recruitment<br />

plan to attract high quality faculty and<br />

staff.<br />

Design and implement a professional<br />

growth plan for administrators, faculty<br />

and staff.<br />

President, Principal, Board of<br />

Regents<br />

<strong>School</strong> budget, Staff, Meeting Time<br />

President, Principal, APs, Dir.<br />

Curr. & Instr., Board of Regents<br />

<strong>School</strong> Budget, Staff, Consultants<br />

and Workshops<br />

President, Principal, APs, Dir<br />

Curr & Instr, Board of Regents<br />

Staff, Faculty In­service, NCLB<br />

Funds, BOD Professional<br />

Development Funds<br />

Revised Salary Scale and<br />

Compensation Packet<br />

2007­2008 – on­going<br />

Staff Profile<br />

2007­2008 – on­going<br />

Teacher Professional Growth<br />

Plans<br />

2007­2008 – on­going<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

119


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007<br />

Category B: Curriculum & Instruction<br />

4. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> will develop, evaluate, and update curriculum that<br />

reflects the Mission and integrates 21 st Century Skills while providing support,<br />

time, and resources for development of research­based best practices in<br />

education.<br />

ESLRs Addressed: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective Communicators,<br />

Active Leaders, Responsible Global Citizens, Life­long Learners<br />

Rationale: The school needs to develop an on­going evaluative model to ensure high<br />

quality instruction and a challenging, comprehensive, and relevant curriculum for each<br />

student.<br />

Strategies Persons/Resources Evaluation/Timeline<br />

Principal, AP Academics, Dir Curr & Instr,<br />

Mentoring Coordinator<br />

Implement a systematic plan for<br />

integrating formal and informal<br />

cognitive coaching, collaboration,<br />

observation, and evaluation both<br />

within and among departments.<br />

NCLB and BOD Professional Development<br />

Funds, Release Time, Summer Grant<br />

Stipends<br />

Mentoring and<br />

Observation<br />

Workshops, Mentoring,<br />

Summer<br />

Grant Evaluation,<br />

Observation<br />

Schedule and<br />

Documentation,<br />

Surveys<br />

2007 – on­going<br />

Educate teachers and provide<br />

appropriate resources to understand<br />

and address the unique learning needs<br />

of each student.<br />

Evaluate the effectiveness of the daily<br />

and yearly schedule and its impact on<br />

student learning.<br />

Analyze the relationship of class size<br />

and student achievement.<br />

Implement an information management<br />

system (including teacher training) to<br />

access, disaggregate, and analyze<br />

data to improve student learning.<br />

AP Academics, Dir Curr & Instr, LD<br />

Coordinator, Department Chairs<br />

BOD Professional Development Funds,<br />

Release Time, Summer Grants, Faculty<br />

In­service<br />

AP Academics, Dir Curr & Instr, Academic<br />

Council, Scheduling Committee<br />

Meeting Time<br />

AP Academics, Dir Curr & Instr, Academic<br />

Council, Class Size Committee<br />

Meeting Time, Budget, Staff, In­service,<br />

Consultants<br />

AP Academics, Dir Curr & Instr,<br />

Department Chairs, Dir Technology, Dir.<br />

Data, Dir. Counseling<br />

Staff, <strong>School</strong> Budget, Consultants, Faculty<br />

In­services<br />

Teacher Training, Followup<br />

Documentation<br />

2007 – on­going<br />

Scheduling Committee<br />

Minutes,<br />

Surveys<br />

2008 – on­going<br />

Class Size Committee<br />

Minutes,<br />

Surveys<br />

2008 – on­going<br />

Teacher Training, Course<br />

Data,<br />

AP, SAT, ACT<br />

Comparison, Data<br />

Evaluation Plan<br />

2008 – on­going<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

120


Develop and implement strategies for<br />

effectively supporting and integrating<br />

appropriate technology that benefits<br />

the school community.<br />

Continue implementing process of<br />

evaluating and updating curriculum in<br />

all departments, including aligning with<br />

state and national standards,<br />

sequencing of courses, and<br />

interdepartmental alignment.<br />

AP Academics, Dir Curr & Instr,<br />

Department Chairs, Dir Technology<br />

Staff, In­service, Emerging Technologies,<br />

Teacher laptops<br />

AP Academics, Dir Curr & Instr,<br />

Department Chairs, Academic Council<br />

Summer Grant Stipends, Workshops, NCLB<br />

Funds, Consultants<br />

Tech Workshops, Surveys,<br />

Laptop<br />

Implementation Plan<br />

2007 – on­going<br />

Curriculum Design<br />

Workshops,<br />

Dept Minutes, On­going<br />

Mentoring<br />

and Development<br />

2007 ­ 2010<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

121


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007<br />

Category C: Support for Student Spiritual, Personal, and<br />

Academic Growth<br />

5. In support of student personal, academic and spiritual growth, <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> will continue to research and implement best<br />

practices in Campus Ministry, Student Activities, and Counseling in order<br />

to fulfill the school’s Mission.<br />

ESLRs Addressed: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective Communicators,<br />

Active Leaders, Responsible Global Citizens, Life­long Learners<br />

Rationale: <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd students in the 21 st Century need strong minds and bodies to<br />

navigate the complex moral and ethical issues of their day.<br />

Strategies Persons/Resources Evaluation/Timeline<br />

AP Campus Ministry, Service Learning<br />

Coordinator, Campus Ministry<br />

Leadership Team<br />

Expand the Campus Ministry<br />

Program including the Service<br />

Learning Program.<br />

Summer Grant Stipend, Budget, Release<br />

Time<br />

Student/faculty<br />

Surveys, Service<br />

Learning Handbook,<br />

Campus Ministry<br />

Annual Report<br />

2007 ­ on­going<br />

Promote the Campus Ministry<br />

Program including the Service<br />

Learning Program.<br />

Design and implement counseling<br />

support services for all students in<br />

the areas of academic, personal, and<br />

college/career counseling.<br />

President, Principal, AP Campus<br />

Ministry, Campus Ministry Leadership<br />

Team<br />

Public Relations, Website, Publications<br />

Summer Grant Stipend, Budget, Release<br />

Time<br />

Principal, AP Academics, Dir. of Counseling<br />

Summer Grant Stipend, Release Time,<br />

NCLB Funds<br />

Student/Faculty<br />

Surveys, Service<br />

Learning Handbook,<br />

Campus Ministry<br />

Annual Report<br />

2007 ­ on­going<br />

Surveys, Summer<br />

Grant Report<br />

2007 – 2008 ­ ongoing<br />

Evaluate school­wide events and AP Campus Life, Dir. Student Activities Surveys, Campus Life<br />

activities in order to involve a larger<br />

Annual Report<br />

number of students. Budget, Staff, Training Spring 2008<br />

Define and publicize the scope of<br />

student support services.<br />

Dir. Counseling, AP Academics, AP<br />

Campus Life, Student Support Services<br />

Coordinator<br />

Budget, Staff, Training, Summer Grant<br />

Stipend, Website, Publications<br />

Dragon Success<br />

Schedule,<br />

Peer Tutoring Report,<br />

Counseling Summer<br />

Grant Report,<br />

Campus Life Annual<br />

Report<br />

2007­2008<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

122


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007<br />

Category D: Resource Management and Development<br />

6. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> will plan and implement a sustainable program to<br />

secure the resources, both human and financial, necessary to fund the strategic<br />

plan, support capital giving, and fulfill the Mission of the school.<br />

ESLRs Addressed: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective Communicators,<br />

Active Leaders, Responsible Global Citizens, Life­long Learners<br />

Rationale: Historically, the school’s budget has been almost entirely funded by tuition.<br />

Relying primarily on tuition will not be sufficient to enable the school to provide a 21 st<br />

century learning environment.<br />

Strategies Persons/Resources Evaluation/Timeline<br />

President, Principal, VP,<br />

Advancement, Board of<br />

Regents, Finance Committee<br />

Financial Reports,<br />

Auditor’s<br />

Report, Board of Regents<br />

Develop a long­range financial plan that<br />

addresses school operations, tuition<br />

assistance, sustainable tuition levels and<br />

attracts and retains qualified staff and<br />

faculty.<br />

Board of Regents Finance<br />

Committee, <strong>School</strong> Financial<br />

Reports<br />

Finance Committee Report<br />

Fall 2007 – Spring 2009<br />

Implement a long­range financial plan that<br />

addresses school operations, tuition<br />

assistance, sustainable tuition levels and<br />

attracts and retains qualified staff and<br />

faculty.<br />

President, Principal, VP,<br />

Advancement, Board of<br />

Regents, Finance Committee<br />

Staff<br />

Finance Committee<br />

Minutes,<br />

<strong>School</strong> Financial Report,<br />

<strong>School</strong> Census<br />

Fall 2007 – Spring 2009<br />

Develop and implement a Public Relations<br />

Plan addressing <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s image,<br />

Identity, and community presence.<br />

Develop and implement a student<br />

recruitment and admissions process to<br />

attract and retain a qualified and diverse<br />

student body.<br />

President, Principal, VP,<br />

Advancement, Dir Admissions<br />

Dir Communications,<br />

Web Designer<br />

President, Principal, Dir.<br />

Admissions<br />

Web Designer, Infosnap,<br />

<strong>School</strong> Budget, Dragon<br />

Ambassadors<br />

Admissions Interviews,<br />

Publications, Website<br />

Fall 2007 – Spring 2009<br />

Admissions Interviews,<br />

Admission Statistics,<br />

Student<br />

Exit Interviews<br />

Fall 2007 – on­going<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

123


<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong>/Strategic Plan Action Plan 2007<br />

Category D: Resource Management and Development<br />

7. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> will approve the Master Facilities Plan, launch a<br />

major capital campaign, and begin construction on school improvements within<br />

three years.<br />

ESLRs Addressed: Academic Achievers, Spiritual Individuals, Effective Communicators,<br />

Active Leaders, Responsible Global Citizens, Life­long Learners<br />

Rationale: A Master Facilities Plan will ensure the school’s current and future ability to<br />

support and deliver its total program.<br />

Strategies Persons/Resources Evaluation/Timeline<br />

President, Principal, Board<br />

of Regents<br />

Develop a Master Facilities Plan for <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.<br />

Architectural Consultants,<br />

Budget, Staff, In­service,<br />

Cost Replacement Study<br />

Board of Regents Building<br />

and Grounds Committee<br />

Minutes and<br />

Report, Architectural<br />

Drawings and Report<br />

Summer ­ Fall 2007<br />

Complete a feasibility study to examine<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s readiness and capacity<br />

to support a capital campaign.<br />

President, Principal, VP<br />

Advancement<br />

Feasibility Consultant, Staff,<br />

Proposed Campaign<br />

Prospectus, Advancement<br />

Office Audit<br />

Report from Feasibility<br />

Consultant<br />

June – October 2007<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

124


Administrative Structures<br />

Appendix A<br />

Authority Relationship<br />

Consultative Relationship<br />

Diocesan<br />

<strong>School</strong> Board<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> of Oakland<br />

Moderator of the Curia<br />

Superintendent of<br />

<strong>School</strong>s<br />

Board of Regents<br />

President<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Diocese of Oakland, CA.<br />

Administrative Structure<br />

Principal<br />

VP<br />

Institutional<br />

Advancement<br />

Director<br />

Finance &<br />

Facilities<br />

Director,<br />

Building<br />

& Grounds<br />

Director,<br />

Adult<br />

Spirituality<br />

Director,<br />

Service<br />

Learning<br />

Assistant<br />

Director,<br />

Finance<br />

Librarian<br />

Asst. Principal<br />

Campus Ministry<br />

Student Activities<br />

Director<br />

Security<br />

Asst. Principal<br />

Campus Life<br />

Department<br />

Chairs<br />

Deans of<br />

Students<br />

Director,<br />

Athletics<br />

Asst. Principal<br />

Academics<br />

Director<br />

Inst.Tech.<br />

Director<br />

Curr. & Instur.<br />

Director of<br />

Learning Needs<br />

Director,<br />

Counseling<br />

Counselors<br />

Publicist<br />

Web<br />

Designer<br />

Director,<br />

Admissions<br />

Director,<br />

Technology<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Director,<br />

Alumni Relations<br />

Director,<br />

Annual Fund<br />

Director,<br />

Planned Giving<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

125


<strong>Bishop</strong> of Oakland<br />

(Reserve Powers)<br />

Superintendent of <strong>School</strong>s<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Diocese of Oakland, CA.<br />

Administrative Functions<br />

Board of Regents ­ Limited Jurisdiction<br />

with oversight for:<br />

• Planning & Policy<br />

• Financial Performance<br />

• Evaluation & Mission Effectiveness<br />

• Institutional Advancement<br />

President (CEO) ­ Oversight of:<br />

• External & Community Affairs<br />

• Institutional Advancement<br />

• Business & Personnel Affairs<br />

• Board/Diocese/ Parish Relations<br />

• Technology Infrastructure<br />

Asst. Principal, Campus<br />

Ministry<br />

• Faith Community Affairs<br />

• Liturgies<br />

• Retreats<br />

• Religious Activities<br />

• Mission Effectiveness<br />

Director, Build & Grounds<br />

• Plant Operations<br />

• Campus Maintenance<br />

• Campus Cleaning<br />

Asst. Director, Finance<br />

• Human Resources<br />

• Employee Benefits<br />

• Payroll Admin.<br />

Director, Service Learning<br />

• Service learning programs<br />

Director, Adult<br />

Spirituality<br />

• Faculty/Staff programs<br />

Director, Finance & Facilities<br />

• Business Affairs<br />

• Budget & Financial Mgmt<br />

• Financial Reporting<br />

• Facilities<br />

• Food Service<br />

• Transportation<br />

Asst Principal, Campus<br />

Life<br />

• Student Activities<br />

• Interscholastic Athletics<br />

• <strong>School</strong> Safety Planning<br />

Dir, Student Activities<br />

• Student Activities<br />

• Master Calendar<br />

Director, Athletics<br />

• Interscholastic<br />

Athletics<br />

• Coaching Supervision<br />

Deans of Students<br />

• Student Safety<br />

• Discipline<br />

• Decorum<br />

• Attendance<br />

Principal (COO) – Oversight of:<br />

• Internal Affairs<br />

• Academic Affairs<br />

• Student Affairs<br />

• Teaching Personnel<br />

Asst. Principal, Academic Affairs<br />

• Teacher Supervision/evaluations<br />

• Curriculum Development<br />

• Instructional Technology<br />

Integration<br />

• Professional Development<br />

Dir. Curriculum & Instruction<br />

• Master Schedule<br />

• Grade Reporting<br />

•Professional Development<br />

Director, Counseling<br />

• Academic/Personal Counseling<br />

• College Placement<br />

• Testing<br />

• Career Guidance<br />

Dir. Instructional Technology<br />

• Technology Integration<br />

• Professional Development<br />

• Training<br />

Director, Security<br />

• Campus Security<br />

• Student Security<br />

Dir. Admissions<br />

• Marketing<br />

• Recruitment<br />

• Admissions<br />

• Student retention<br />

Dir, Tech Infrastructure<br />

• Technology Planning<br />

• Tech Development<br />

• Tech Maintenance<br />

• Office Technology<br />

• Tech Purchasing<br />

Publicist<br />

• <strong>School</strong> Publications<br />

• Public/Media Relations<br />

Web Designer<br />

• Website Development<br />

VP, Development<br />

• Fundraising<br />

• Major Gifts/Grants<br />

• Special Events<br />

• Endowments<br />

• Alumni Affairs<br />

• Planned Giving<br />

Director, Annual Fund<br />

• Annual Fund Dev<br />

Director, Alumni<br />

Relations<br />

• Alumni Relations<br />

• Grants<br />

Director, Planned<br />

Giving<br />

• Planned Giving<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

126


Executive Council<br />

Directors’ Council<br />

President<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Diocese of Oakland, CA.<br />

Administrative Councils<br />

Principal<br />

Director,<br />

Finance &<br />

Facilities<br />

Asst. Principal,<br />

Campus Ministry<br />

Asst. Principal,<br />

Campus Life<br />

Asst. Principal,<br />

Academics<br />

VP,<br />

Institutional<br />

Advancement<br />

Director,<br />

Counseling<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

Director,<br />

Student Activities<br />

Deans of<br />

Students<br />

Director,<br />

Athletics<br />

127


Campus Facilities Map<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

128


Bell Schedule 2007­2008<br />

GOLD DAY<br />

(80 minutes)<br />

1 8:30 ­ 9:55<br />

Break 9:55 ­ 10:05<br />

3 10:10 ­ 11:30<br />

5a 11:35 ­ 12:55<br />

5b 12:15 ­ 1:35<br />

7 1:40 ­ 3:00<br />

BLACK DAY<br />

(80 minutes)<br />

2 8:30 ­ 9:55<br />

Homeroom 10:00 ­ 10:10<br />

Break 10:10 ­ 10:20<br />

4 10:25 ­ 11:45<br />

6a 11:50 ­ 1:10<br />

6b 12:30 ­ 1:50<br />

MP 2:00 ­ 3:00<br />

SILVER DAY<br />

(80 minutes)<br />

2 8:30 ­ 9:55<br />

Break 9:55 ­ 10:10<br />

4 10:15 ­ 11:35<br />

Break 11:35 ­ 11:45<br />

6 11:50 ­ 1:10<br />

* DISMISSAL @ 1:10PM<br />

Lunch 1 11:30 ­12:10<br />

Lunch 2 12:55 ­ 1:35<br />

DRAGON DAY<br />

(45 minutes)<br />

1 8:30 ­ 9:20<br />

2 9:25 ­ 10:10<br />

3 10:15 ­ 11:00<br />

Break 11:00 ­ 11:10<br />

4 11:15 ­ 12:00<br />

5a 12:05 ­ 12:50<br />

5b 12:40 ­ 1:25<br />

6 1:30 ­ 2:15<br />

7 2:20 ­ 3:05<br />

Lunch 1 12:00 ­12:35<br />

Lunch 2 12:50 ­ 1:25<br />

Lunch 1 11:45 ­ 12:25<br />

Lunch 2 1:10 ­ 1:50<br />

WHITE DAY<br />

(80 minutes)<br />

*For liturgy & assemblies.<br />

2 8:30 ­ 9:55<br />

Homeroom 10:00 ­ 10:10<br />

Extra 10:10 ­ 11:25<br />

Break 11:25 ­ 11:35<br />

6a 11:40 ­ 1:00<br />

6b 12:15 ­ 1:35<br />

4 1:40 ­ 3:00<br />

Lunch 1 11:35 ­ 12:10<br />

Lunch 2 1:00 ­ 1:35<br />

MINIMUM DAY<br />

(30 minutes)<br />

*For Special Event use.<br />

1 8:30 ­ 9:02<br />

2 9:07 ­ 9:37<br />

3 9:42 ­ 10:12<br />

4 10:17 ­ 10:47<br />

Break 10:47 ­ 11:05<br />

5 11:10 ­ 11:40<br />

6 11:45 ­ 12:15<br />

7 12:20 – 12:50<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

129


Calendar Activities<br />

August September October November<br />

Freshmen Study Skills<br />

New Student Orientation<br />

First Day of <strong>School</strong><br />

Opening <strong>School</strong> Mass<br />

Back­to­<strong>School</strong> Night<br />

Senior Retreat<br />

Homecoming<br />

Recycling Week<br />

Club Fair<br />

Campus Tours begin<br />

Junior Class Ring Ceremony<br />

Parent­Teacher Conferences<br />

Spirit Week<br />

Oktoberfest Auction<br />

Freshmen Retreats begin<br />

College Night<br />

Golf Tournament<br />

December January February March<br />

Food and Toy Drive<br />

Advent Liturgy<br />

Finals<br />

Freshmen Liturgy<br />

Black History Month Assembly<br />

Ash Wednesday Liturgy<br />

College Financial Aid Night<br />

Respect Life Week<br />

Catholic <strong>School</strong>s Week<br />

Close­up Trip<br />

HSPT Prep Workshop<br />

Winter Ball<br />

April May June<br />

Earth Week<br />

Spring Musical<br />

AP Exams<br />

Award Assemblies<br />

Baccalaureate<br />

Final Exams<br />

Senior Bar­b­que<br />

Yearbook Day<br />

Grad Night<br />

Senior Ball<br />

Navigating O’Dowd<br />

Spring Concert<br />

End of <strong>School</strong> Mass<br />

Graduation<br />

Summer <strong>School</strong> Begins<br />

All Saints Liturgy<br />

Sophomore Immersion begins<br />

Blood Drive<br />

Junior Retreat<br />

Open House<br />

Fall Play<br />

Multi­cultural Week<br />

Student Nominating Convention<br />

Mission Drive<br />

Junior Prom<br />

New Student Registration<br />

Friends of the Dragon Crab Feed<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

130


Summary of Personnel Data<br />

Teacher Profile<br />

Total number of Teachers = 78<br />

· 61 teach full­time (78%)<br />

· 6 teach part­time (8%)<br />

· 11 teach and hold other positions (14%)<br />

Teachers without credential = 28* (36% w/o credential of these 25% are in Religion<br />

department & 29% are in Art department only)<br />

· In process of achieving credential = 8<br />

· Teachers with MA or MS degree = 40<br />

· Teachers pursuing MA/MS degrees = 6<br />

· Teachers with Doctorate = 3<br />

· Teachers pursuing Doctorate = 1<br />

· Teachers with JD = 1<br />

* Of the 28 without a teaching credential:<br />

Religion Dept = 7 Art Dept = 8<br />

Religion Teachers with MA = 5 Art Teachers with MA = 2<br />

Religion Teachers with BA = 7 Art Teachers with BA = 8<br />

Miscellaneous teachers without credential = 13<br />

· 5 have MA in teaching field<br />

· 2 have Ph.D. in teaching field<br />

· 1 has MA in non­teaching field<br />

· 2 have BS in teaching field & are pursuing credentials<br />

· 3 have BA in field other than that teaching, 1 is pursuing MA and credential in<br />

field<br />

Counseling Department<br />

· 4 counselors have Pupil Personnel K­12 credential<br />

· 1 counselor holds a Marriage Family Therapy certificate and a MS in Clinical<br />

Counseling<br />

· 2 counselors have MA degrees in Counseling.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

131


<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

Technology Summer ’07 Training Schedule<br />

Technology Training June 4 – 7 8:30 am – 2:30 pm<br />

June 11­14<br />

8:30 am – 2:30 pm<br />

This four­day training involves basic skill development, teacher productivity, and<br />

classroom integration. All participants receive hands­on instruction in general computer<br />

operation, software basics (Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Blackboard) as well as<br />

classroom integration ideas including lesson plan ideas and best practices. Please note<br />

that the series is repeated a second week to accommodate more people and keep the<br />

classes small.<br />

Please sign up with Lisa T. since these sessions are open to other schools.<br />

Power<strong>School</strong> Quick Review Aug. 13 9:00 ­1 0:30 am<br />

Come to this work session to help you set­up your classes for the fall. Peg and Joy will be<br />

available to assist individual needs with regards to setting up classes. This session is for<br />

teachers needing basic assistance with regards to Power<strong>School</strong>.<br />

Organization & Troubleshooting Aug. 13 11:00 am ­1:00<br />

pm<br />

This session will cover basic troubleshooting for the computer. You will learn how to back<br />

up your laptop, configure your computer for wireless, scan for viruses, and make sure<br />

your computer is working efficiently. In addition, you will find out how to organize your<br />

work by using folders, how to search for files, and where things are located on your<br />

computer.<br />

Beginning Blackboard Aug. 13 1:30 – 3:00 pm<br />

Get a jump start on setting up your classes for next year. This session will walk you<br />

through setting­up a course in Blackboard, customizing your site, using the Control<br />

Panel, and adding information to your course.<br />

Intermediate Blackboard Aug. 14 9:00 ­1 0:30 am<br />

Learn how to use the discussion board, groups, and the virtual class in Blackboard. The<br />

TurnItIn course integration will be explored as well. This is a good class for those of you<br />

who want to take your class a bit further next year.<br />

*Beginning Blackboard Aug. 16 8:00 am – 10:00 am<br />

Set up your classes for fall. This session will walk you through setting­up a course in<br />

Blackboard, customizing your site, using the Control Panel, and adding information to<br />

your course.<br />

*Power<strong>School</strong> Basics Aug. 16 10:30 am – 12:30 pm<br />

This course will introduce you to Power<strong>School</strong> and how it is used at BOD. This is<br />

beginning Power<strong>School</strong>, and will provide support for teachers who need more than a<br />

quick review in order to get their classes set up for fall.<br />

Power<strong>School</strong> Quick Review Aug. 16 12:30 – 1:30 pm<br />

Come to this work session to help you set­up your classes for the fall. Peg and Joy will be<br />

available to assist individual needs with regards to setting up classes. This session is for<br />

teachers needing basic assistance with regards to Power<strong>School</strong>.<br />

**Voice over IP (VoIP) Sept. 4,5,6 During prep periods<br />

Every classroom will be equipped with a new phone system. Teachers and administrators<br />

will learn how to use our new VoIP system in this class.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

132


<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Professional Development Action Plan<br />

2007­2008<br />

Description<br />

The Professional Development program at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> provides<br />

ongoing support and professional growth opportunities for 21 st century<br />

technology integration, curriculum design, instructional management,<br />

collaboration, and planning.<br />

The Strategic Planning Curriculum committee recommends the following goals<br />

relating the professional development at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd:<br />

1. A culture of professional learning communities both within disciplines and<br />

among disciplines in all area of school life.<br />

2. A culture where excellence in teaching pervades every department,<br />

course, and activity. Best research­based practices are implemented and<br />

student achievement of the mission drives decision­making.<br />

3. A professional learning culture with the opportunities to make consistent<br />

and ongoing improvement in:<br />

a. The use of data to drive instruction and improve learning on a<br />

daily basis.<br />

b. The use of technology to improve student outcomes.<br />

c. Assessment literacy to assist teachers in meeting the learning<br />

needs of each student.<br />

d. The refinement of precise instructional strategies in order to bridge<br />

the gap between successful and struggling students.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

133


Professional Development Outcomes for 2007­2008<br />

· Establish a support system for the development and implementation of<br />

professional learning communities as a sustainable model.<br />

· Develop opportunities for understanding the value and impact of datadriven<br />

decision­making.<br />

· Develop department leadership models that successfully guide teachers<br />

in curriculum development, instructional strategies, and peer­to­peer<br />

observations.<br />

· Promote the sharing, development, and articulation of best practices<br />

within and among departments.<br />

· Empower teachers to be independent and innovative users of technology.<br />

· Guide department leaders in evaluating, selecting, and integrating<br />

appropriate and effective content specific technologies.<br />

· Support, lead, and mentor new teachers into the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd spiritual<br />

and educational community.<br />

· Successfully integrate school ESLRs into curriculum and campus life.<br />

· Effectively steward NCLB funding for professional development.<br />

· Develop process for sharing professional development experiences and<br />

learning within the school community.<br />

· Establish professional development norms and expectations for faculty,<br />

staff, and administration.<br />

· Implement a technology enhanced management system for the college<br />

planning process.<br />

· Investigate and implement current education research and trends.<br />

· Expand professional development presence on the <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

website.<br />

· Perform systematic faculty Needs Assessment and design professional<br />

development opportunities to respond to immediate and long­term needs.<br />

· Support and develop Catholic leadership for the 21 st century.<br />

· Collaborate with other schools in promoting and presenting professional<br />

development opportunities.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

134


Professional Development – Summer ‘06<br />

The following Professional Development workshops were offered to <strong>Bishop</strong><br />

O’Dowd teachers:<br />

June 6 – 9<br />

Studying Skillful Teaching (12 BOD)<br />

June 8 – 9<br />

Cooperative Learning (12 BOD)<br />

June 12 – 15 Observing and Analyzing Teaching (12 BOD)<br />

June 19 – 21 Technology Support Workshop (8 BOD)<br />

June 26 – 28 Technology Support Workshop (8 BOD)<br />

June 27 – 29 Backwards Design Workshop (Summer Curr Grants ­10)<br />

July 10 – 12 Power<strong>School</strong> Training (admins ­ 8)<br />

August 14 – 16 Power<strong>School</strong> Training (all faculty/staff)<br />

August 14 – 16 Study Skills Training (12 BOD)<br />

Ü Studying Skillful Teaching<br />

This course introduces current research, case studies, collaborative inquiry and<br />

problem solving, video clips, and ongoing reflection about our experiments and data<br />

to construct powerful understandings about what makes a difference for students.<br />

Ü Observing and Analyzing Teaching<br />

This course focuses on the work that teacher leaders, supervisors, and evaluators do<br />

to support and sustain high­quality teaching. The knowledge base on teaching, video<br />

clips, role plays, collegial consultation and feedback and on­site performance<br />

assessment are used to build capacity to identify what makes a difference to students<br />

and their learning.<br />

Ü Cooperative Learning<br />

Learn how to design, develop, and deliver effective cooperative learning activities<br />

and evaluate your current effectiveness in your classroom design. Share ideas and<br />

practice effective strategies for making a difference in your students and instruction.<br />

Ü Technology Support Workshops<br />

Participants learn and practice basic Microsoft Office skills including the<br />

fundamentals of MS Word, MS Excel, MS PowerPoint. All participants receive an<br />

easy step­by­step skill book and classroom activities idea book. Training is<br />

customized for teachers, staff, and administrators.<br />

Ü Backwards Design Workshop<br />

Summer Grant participants and other interested participants are invited to learn more<br />

about “unpacking” content specific educational standards and using those standards<br />

as the basis for constructing and developing effective using the “Understanding by<br />

Design” curriculum development model.<br />

Ü Power<strong>School</strong> Training for Administrators and Staff<br />

Pearson Publishing provides a trainer and teacher to guide <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd<br />

administrators and staff to guide new users through the Power<strong>School</strong> features and<br />

benefits. Participants include key administrators, counselors, staff, technology team,<br />

and select teachers.<br />

Ü Power<strong>School</strong> Training for Teachers<br />

The BOD technology team provides a training process for all teachers with the goal<br />

of offering clear and complete skill steps, procedures, and expectations for the<br />

successful implementation of the Power<strong>School</strong> system. All participants receive a<br />

complete technology “toolkit” for sustained usability.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

135


Ü Study Skills Training<br />

Teachers learn best practices for effectively evaluating and implementing the new<br />

freshmen study skills curriculum.<br />

Professional Development –<br />

Professional Development Outcomes<br />

Summer­Fall­Winter ‘06<br />

Conferences Supported:<br />

National PE Teacher Educators<br />

Professional Enhancement Math Association<br />

43rd Annual Society of Engineers<br />

Discovering Geometry<br />

Fundamentals of Linguistics<br />

Health Education for Teachers<br />

National Educators Computing Conference<br />

AP Summer in Psychology<br />

Teachers as Artists<br />

Second Language Acquisition<br />

Multicultural Education<br />

Ed: Student Teaching Single Subject<br />

The Latin Workshop<br />

Project Zero Classroom<br />

AP Summer Institute<br />

Italia! Italia!<br />

California Science Educational Conference<br />

NABT Prof Development Conference<br />

2006 National Sexuality Conference<br />

Dramatic Literature<br />

Social Foundations Conference<br />

NCSS Annual Conference<br />

NCSS Annual Conference<br />

Instructional Leadership Conference<br />

Blackboard Integration Training<br />

USD AP Summer Institute<br />

Summer Workshop Fall Follow­up<br />

R Studying Skillful Teaching (2 days)<br />

R Cooperative Learning (1 day)<br />

R Observing and Analyzing Teaching (3 days)<br />

R Backwards Design (2 days)<br />

R <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Data­Driven Evaluation (2 days)<br />

• Investigate and implement current<br />

education research and trends.<br />

• Develop department leadership<br />

models that successfully guide<br />

teachers in curriculum development,<br />

instructional strategies, and peer­topeer<br />

observations.<br />

• Promote the sharing, development,<br />

and articulation of best practices<br />

within and among departments.<br />

• Develop opportunities for<br />

understanding the value and impact of<br />

data­driven decision­making.<br />

• Empower teachers to be independent<br />

and innovative users of technology.<br />

• Guide department leaders in<br />

evaluating, selecting, and integrating<br />

appropriate and effective content<br />

specific technologies.<br />

• Effectively steward NCLB funding for<br />

professional development.<br />

Graduate Course Participants<br />

Kevin Cushing Don Goss Romeo Baldeviso<br />

Ray Lehner Edwige Gamache Summer Dittmer<br />

Lani Wolf Katherine Pittman Else Dittmer<br />

Anton Brammer George Watson Louis Segura<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

136


Professional Development – Technology<br />

Fall – Winter ­ Spring ’06­‘07<br />

Ongoing Technology Workshop Opportunities<br />

Workshops are offered weekly to teachers for 1­2 hours<br />

after school. Personal instruction and coaching on these<br />

technologies is also available during the school day.<br />

R Safari Montage<br />

R Blackboard<br />

R Turn­it­in.com<br />

R PowerGrade<br />

R e­mail<br />

R Quia<br />

R Quizdom<br />

R Tablet Basics<br />

R Rosetta Stone<br />

Content Workshop Opportunities<br />

The following workshops were designed and scheduled<br />

to meet specific technology and content needs.<br />

R TI Navigator – January (six hours)<br />

Math Department personnel<br />

Professional Development<br />

Outcomes<br />

• Promote the sharing,<br />

development, and articulation of<br />

best practices within and among<br />

departments.<br />

• Empower teachers to be<br />

independent and innovative users<br />

of technology.<br />

• Guide department leaders in<br />

evaluating, selecting, and<br />

integrating appropriate and<br />

effective content specific<br />

technologies.<br />

• Implement a technology<br />

enhanced management system<br />

for the college planning process.<br />

R Naviance – February 16 (six hours)<br />

Perform systematic faculty Needs<br />

Counseling Department personnel (college planning software)<br />

R Power<strong>School</strong> Scheduling ­ February (3 days)<br />

Gene Yang, Fran Wamerdam, Candy Promes, Lisa Tortorich<br />

R Computer Using Educators – February (4 days)<br />

15 teachers and administrators will attend<br />

Just­in­Time Training (immediate need instruction)<br />

R LCD Projector basics and troubleshooting<br />

R PowerGrade<br />

R PC Troubleshooting<br />

R Library Databases<br />

Dr. Joy Lopez is evaluating library data base usage and plans to train<br />

new librarian personnel on effective database usage.<br />

Blackboard Department Training<br />

Teachers are offered individual and department training for the Blackboard<br />

content management system. Specific departments and groups have formed<br />

communities or requested department specific Blackboard training. The goal is to<br />

have all teachers effectively using Blackboard by mid­fall 2007.<br />

R Religion Department (learning community)<br />

R Social Studies<br />

R Coaching for Excellence<br />

R <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong><br />

R AP Psychology cartridge<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

137


Professional Development Opportunities<br />

Spring – Summer ‘07<br />

Productivity Software for Support Staff<br />

MS Word, PPT, Database, e­mail, Power<strong>School</strong><br />

Laptop Program for Teachers<br />

June – August 2007<br />

Library Technology Training<br />

Database training for new personnel<br />

Peer­to­Peer Mentoring<br />

Fifteen participants<br />

February 9 & March 8<br />

Effective Assessment Strategies<br />

Backward Design Follow­up<br />

March 8<br />

<strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong><br />

Faculty In­service ­ March 20<br />

Summer Workshops<br />

Backward Design<br />

Life­Long Learning (Chalk & Ramirez)<br />

Professional Learning Communities<br />

Studying Skillful Teaching<br />

Research for Better Teaching (w/ SI)<br />

Professional Development Outcomes<br />

• Investigate and implement current<br />

education research and trends.<br />

• Develop department leadership<br />

models that successfully guide<br />

teachers in curriculum development,<br />

instructional strategies, and peer­topeer<br />

observations.<br />

• Promote the sharing, development,<br />

and articulation of best practices<br />

within and among departments.<br />

• Develop opportunities for<br />

understanding the value and impact of<br />

data­driven decision­making.<br />

• Empower teachers to be independent<br />

and innovative users of technology.<br />

• Guide department leaders in<br />

evaluating, selecting, and integrating<br />

appropriate and effective content<br />

specific technologies.<br />

• Effectively steward NCLB funding for<br />

professional development.<br />

• Empower teachers to be independent<br />

and innovative users of technology.<br />

Moral Development Across the Curriculum ­ August<br />

Cooperative Learning<br />

Research for Better Teaching<br />

Peer­to­Peer Mentoring ­ August<br />

New Teacher Orientation (Technology Training)<br />

Understanding the Role of the Department Chair<br />

Lorraine Ozar (in cooperation with DLS)<br />

Observing and Analyzing Teaching – ongoing coaching from RBT<br />

Naviance Training – ongoing with teachers (English and religion)<br />

September – Building a Community of Learners<br />

Professional Learning Communities<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

138


New Teacher Orientation Agendas<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

August 13­14, 2007<br />

Day 1 – August 13: 8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Board Room, Dominican Hall<br />

Agenda<br />

8:30 – 9:00 Prayer, Welcome Steve Phelps, Joe Salamack<br />

Overview of Day 1<br />

Janet Vax<br />

9:00 – 9:25 Ice Breaker Janet Vax<br />

9:25 – 10:00 <strong>School</strong> History, Mission, Vision Janet Vax<br />

Nuts and Bolts<br />

Materials, Front Office, supplies, xerox<br />

10:00­10:15 Break<br />

10:15­11:15 Faculty Handbook Lisa Tortorich<br />

Graduation Requirements<br />

11:15­12:00 Attendance, Dress Code, Student Safety, Parking<br />

Sondra Arnsdorf, Gary<br />

Mason<br />

12:00­12:45 Working lunch<br />

Business Office<br />

Steve Depetris, Joan Grell<br />

12:45­1:30 Academics Janet Vax<br />

Course Information sheets<br />

Grading policies, make­up work<br />

Expectations for returning calls, how to communicate<br />

Final exams<br />

Course evaluations<br />

Establish number of graded assignments<br />

<strong>School</strong> calendar<br />

Handling parent concerns<br />

1:30­1:45 Campus Ministry Brian Judd<br />

1:45 – 2:00 Break<br />

2:00­3:30 Email, laptops, printers and more Joy Lopez, Peg Valva<br />

3:30 ­ 4:00 Homework: Development of Course Information Sheets<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

139


August 13­14, 2007<br />

Day 2 – August 14: 8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Board Room, Dominican Hall<br />

Agenda<br />

8:30­9:00 Prayer, Welcome Janet vax<br />

Day 2 Overview<br />

Course Information Sheets<br />

9:00­9:15 Student Leadership Katie<br />

Pittman/ASB<br />

9:15­9:30 <strong>WCEA</strong>/<strong>WASC</strong> Janet<br />

Vax<br />

9:30:9:45 Role of Counselor Fran<br />

Warmerdam<br />

Do’s and Don’ts<br />

Scheduling<br />

9:45­10:15 Learning Needs Eva Marlatt<br />

10:15­10:30 Break<br />

10:30­10:45 Substitutions Mary Kamian<br />

10:45­11:00 Partnership with Parents Lisa Tortorich<br />

· Parent­Student Handbooks<br />

· Rules for Students<br />

11:00­11:45 Academics Lisa Tortorich<br />

· Classroom Observations<br />

· Daily Schedule<br />

· Course Evaluations<br />

· Meeting Periods<br />

12:00­12:45 Working Lunch Development<br />

Staff<br />

12:45­1:30 Academics Lisa Tortorich<br />

· Coming Events<br />

· Weekly Meetings<br />

· Back to <strong>School</strong> Night<br />

1:30­2:00 Professional Development/NCLB Lisa Tortorich<br />

Excellence in Teaching<br />

2:00 – 3:30 Peer Mentor Program Anton<br />

Brammer<br />

Campus Tour<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

140


3:30 Social<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

141


Student Survey Questions<br />

1. Demographics<br />

I am a student in grade: 9 10 11 12<br />

I am a transfer student: Yes<br />

No<br />

I am: Male Female<br />

General Directions: Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following<br />

statements, using this scale:<br />

1: Strongly Disagree<br />

2: Somewhat Disagree<br />

3: Neither Agree nor Disagree<br />

4: Somewhat Agree<br />

5: Strongly Agree<br />

2. Mission and Philosophy<br />

· I understand the Mission and Philosophy at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.<br />

· I support the Mission and Philosophy at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.<br />

· The curriculum and instruction reflect the Mission and Philosophy.<br />

· I am aware of the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> expected­school­wide learning results<br />

(ESLRs).<br />

3. Catholic Identity<br />

· The Catholic identity of the school is clear to me.<br />

· My classes provide the support and opportunity to develop my personal faith.<br />

· Co­curricular activities provide support and opportunity to develop my personal<br />

faith.<br />

· My teachers and coaches are good role models of Catholic values.<br />

4. Campus Ministry<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> retreats provide opportunities to develop and enhance my<br />

personal faith and spirituality.<br />

· Liturgies and prayer services at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> are meaningful events for me.<br />

· Students have opportunity to provide input for liturgies through CMT (Campus<br />

Ministry Teams).<br />

· I am aware of the expanding Service­Learning program at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>.<br />

· Dollar Days and charity drives reflect the school's Mission and values.<br />

· I have learned about helping others as a result of the school's Dollar Days and<br />

charity drives.<br />

· The school provides a variety of prayer opportunities.<br />

5. Diversity/<strong>School</strong> Culture<br />

· I feel like I "belong" as a member of the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> community.<br />

· I feel respected and supported by my classmates.<br />

· The school is a good example of a diverse learning community.<br />

· I feel safe at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong>.<br />

· I represent the values of <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> both on and off campus.<br />

· The discipline code is consistent and fair.<br />

· I understand my responsibilities with regard to observing school rules.<br />

· I take pride in the school facilities.<br />

6. Learning Environment<br />

· My teachers effectively communicate their course expectations and grading<br />

system to me.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

142


· My teachers use a variety of teaching methods appropriate to the subject matter<br />

and grade level.<br />

· In my classes in general, I am able to demonstrate my learning not only through<br />

quizzes and tests, but also in other ways such as creative projects, essays,<br />

portfolios, oral presentations, and discussions.<br />

· I have developed good study habits.<br />

· Teachers discuss how we can manage our time to accomplish work efficiently.<br />

· How many hours do you normally spend on homework each night? 1 2 3 4 or<br />

more<br />

· Homework assignments reinforce and enhance my classroom learning.<br />

· Teachers treat students with respect and give help whenever possible.<br />

· My teachers are competent, knowledgeable, and well prepared.<br />

· The academic program at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> has encouraged me to<br />

express my opinion freely in class and respect the opinion of others in a positive<br />

learning environment.<br />

· Tests are graded fairly.<br />

· I have cheated on a test or homework in at least one class.<br />

· My teachers are approachable and care about me as a person.<br />

· Computers are accessible in the labs and assistance is available when I need<br />

them.<br />

· Computers are upgraded to the latest technology for my benefit and progress.<br />

· Teacher websites are well­maintained and useful.<br />

Please rate each department on general quality.<br />

· English<br />

· Mathematics<br />

· Social Studies<br />

· Religious Studies<br />

· Technology<br />

· Foreign Language<br />

· Science<br />

· Fine Arts<br />

· Physical Education<br />

Directions:<br />

For the following items, on a scale of 1 to 5 indicate whether you agree with the<br />

statement by marking the number on your answer sheet:<br />

Strongly disagree Neutral Strongly agree<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

· I receive all the individual attention I need from my teachers.<br />

· Some teachers allow students to be repeatedly disruptive in class.<br />

· I make good use of Meeting Period (MP) time.<br />

7. Counseling<br />

· Counselors help me make wise decisions that enable me to manage my time<br />

effectively so that I am able to succeed academically.<br />

· My counselor follows up on those actions he/she agreed to do.<br />

· My counselor shows concern and care for me as a person by treating my<br />

questions and problems with respect.<br />

· I understand how to use the counseling services at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>.<br />

· Counselors are knowledgeable and informative about the college application<br />

process.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

143


8. Miscellaneous Questions<br />

· The school website is clear and easy to navigate.<br />

· The library is readily available at convenient times.<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> provides meaningful and well­organized co­curriculars for me<br />

outside of sports.<br />

· I am informed of activities, events, and important information in time to<br />

participate.<br />

· Student government leaders are effective in helping communication between<br />

students, teachers, and administration.<br />

· <strong>School</strong> publications (newspaper and yearbook) are products I can be proud of.<br />

· The school facilities are well maintained.<br />

· If I had to do it again, I would enthusiastically come to <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>.<br />

· I would enthusiastically recommend <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> to other students from my<br />

community as an excellent educational experience.<br />

Areas of Strength<br />

Academics<br />

Fine Arts Department<br />

Extra Curricular Activities<br />

Teachers<br />

<strong>School</strong> Environment/Community<br />

Mathematics Department<br />

Religion<br />

Technology<br />

Bell Schedule<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

Teachers<br />

Facilities<br />

Lunch (cost, food, lines)<br />

Dress Code<br />

Foreign Language<br />

English Department<br />

Diversity<br />

Parking / Transportation<br />

Communication<br />

Dances<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

144


Student Survey Analysis<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

145


Faculty and Staff Survey Questions<br />

1. Demographics<br />

· I teach the following grade levels: 9 10 11 12 N/A<br />

· I have been a member of the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> Faculty/Staff for:<br />

1­5 years 6­10 years 11­15 years 16­20 years over 20 years<br />

General Directions: Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following<br />

statements, using this scale:<br />

1: Strongly Disagree<br />

2: Somewhat Disagree<br />

3: Neither Agree nor Disagree<br />

4: Somewhat Agree<br />

5: Strongly Agree<br />

2. Mission and Philosophy<br />

· A clearly defined Mission and Philosophy is evident at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>.<br />

· I understand and support the Mission and Philosophy.<br />

· The students understand the Mission and Philosophy.<br />

· The curriculum and instruction are congruent with the school's Mission<br />

Statement.<br />

· I make an effort to put the school's Mission into action in my everyday<br />

interactions with my colleagues and students.<br />

3. Catholic Identity<br />

· Our school is appropriately Catholic in its atmosphere and traditions.<br />

· <strong>School</strong> liturgies and prayer services are celebrations of who we are as a school<br />

community.<br />

· Our school provides students with a variety of spiritual experiences that are<br />

meaningful to young people.<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> demonstrates an openness to non­Catholic and non­Christian<br />

religious traditions.<br />

· As a member of this school community, I support the programs of spiritual<br />

formation for students and colleagues.<br />

4. Learning Environment<br />

· Our academic environment prepares students for college and university life.<br />

· I actively incorporate and implement the school's ESLRs into my curriculum and<br />

instruction.<br />

· The students understand the school's ESLRs.<br />

· I use a variety of assessment techniques to measure expected student learning<br />

results.<br />

· I am prepared for the curriculum I am asked to teach.<br />

· Our students demonstrate higher­order thinking processes.<br />

· Students, faculty, and staff have adequate access to and training for technology.<br />

· The counselors sufficiently assist me in working with the students.<br />

· Student discipline is consistently implemented and clearly communicated to<br />

students, parents, faculty, and staff.<br />

· I agree with the importance that the school places on supporting student<br />

participation in co­curricular activities.<br />

· My participation in co­curriculars has a significant impact on the student<br />

community.<br />

· I am supported in my co­curricular activities.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

146


· Leaders of Student Council and student organizations receive sufficient<br />

leadership training.<br />

· There are sufficient opportunities for students to assume leadership roles.<br />

5. <strong>School</strong> Culture/Diversity<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> is a good place to work.<br />

· Students are the first concern of every faculty and staff member.<br />

· I feel respected and supported by my department.<br />

· The school environment supports student self­esteem.<br />

· As a teacher, I consider student learning differences when planning curriculum.<br />

· There is adequate support at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> for students with learning<br />

differences.<br />

· I welcome the opportunity to teach to a diverse student body.<br />

6. Partnership with Parents<br />

· There is adequate communication between teachers and parents.<br />

· I return parent phone calls and e­mails promptly.<br />

· As a faculty or staff member, I feel prepared and supported in facilitating<br />

discussions with parents.<br />

7. Professional Environment<br />

· I am pleased with the direction in which the school is heading.<br />

· Administration, faculty, and staff work well together.<br />

· Professional evaluation is utilized as a tool for fostering the professional growth<br />

of faculty, staff, and administration.<br />

· Teachers are supported and encouraged to utilize innovative approaches to<br />

enhance student learning.<br />

· Teachers and staff are held accountable to high standards of job performance.<br />

· I work regularly with my level colleagues and contribute to the level work.<br />

· I am a positive influence among my peers.<br />

· There is sufficient support and encouragement for my academic growth.<br />

· Individual administrator's responsibilities are clearly defined and understood by<br />

faculty, staff, and other members of the school community.<br />

· Administration communicates the expectations of my job description clearly.<br />

8. Finance<br />

· I have adequate materials and resources to do my job.<br />

· I have adequate curriculum and instruction prep time.<br />

· The number of students in my classes is appropriate.<br />

· I am adequately compensated (salary/benefits) for the work I perform.<br />

· The school administration actively supports the professional development of<br />

faculty through allocation of time and use of personnel and fiscal resources.<br />

9. <strong>School</strong> Facilities<br />

· The physical plant is organized in a way that allows me to do my job.<br />

· The facilities are well­maintained.<br />

· Day­to­day repairs of the school facilities are timely and equitably performed.<br />

· I am aware of and have read the school's emergency plan.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

147


Faculty and Staff Survey Analysis<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

148


Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

149


Areas of Strength<br />

Academics<br />

Diversity<br />

Spirituality/Catholic teachings<br />

Teaching staff<br />

Athletics<br />

Sense of community<br />

Administration/leadership<br />

Safe environment<br />

Extra­curricular activities<br />

<strong>School</strong> culture, environment<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

Facility/Infra­structure<br />

Discipline<br />

Counseling<br />

Professional development of staff<br />

Finance/Resources<br />

Athletics<br />

Fine Arts<br />

Traffic/Parking<br />

Curriculum<br />

Campus Ministry<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

150


Parent Survey Questions<br />

Number of Respondents: 364<br />

General Directions: Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following<br />

statements, using this scale:<br />

1: Strongly Disagree<br />

2: Somewhat Disagree<br />

3: Neither Agree nor Disagree<br />

4: Somewhat Agree<br />

5: Strongly Agree<br />

1. Diversity<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> effectively teaches students to respect all people regardless of<br />

socio­economic background.<br />

· Teachers effectively take into account diversity issues when planning curriculum.<br />

· The school provides support for gay and lesbian students and their families.<br />

2. Charism/Catholic Identity<br />

· Our school is appropriately Catholic in its atmosphere, identity and traditions.<br />

· Faculty and staff demonstrate respect for the school's Catholic identity.<br />

· A sense of spirituality is evident at this school.<br />

· The religious education program has deepened my child's spirituality.<br />

· While Catholic in tradition, our school teaches respect for all religions.<br />

· The Campus Ministry staff provides ample opportunity for spiritual guidance and<br />

spiritual direction for students and parents.<br />

· Campus Ministry programs (retreats, days of reflection, immersion trips, liturgies,<br />

reconciliation services) support the spiritual development and personal growth of<br />

students.<br />

· The Christian Service program provides an effective, positive experience in line<br />

with the school's mission and values.<br />

3. <strong>School</strong> Culture<br />

· Parent (Teen) Challenge Evenings for alcohol and substance abuse are effective<br />

and informative.<br />

· The school has done a good job of raising my child's awareness of the dangers<br />

of drugs and alcohol.<br />

· I am aware of specific students from this school who need intervention for illegal<br />

drug usage.<br />

· I am concerned that my child is showing signs of behavioral change that might<br />

indicate depression, and/or potential for at­risk behaviors.<br />

· If a student is caught with drugs, rehabilitation should be attempted before<br />

expulsion is considered.<br />

· In addition to abstinence, the school's sex education program should include<br />

discussions of the pros and cons of all birth control and AIDS prevention<br />

methods.<br />

· The school has helped my child develop positive self­esteem.<br />

· Students are given the opportunity to build leadership skills.<br />

4. Finance<br />

· If I had to do it again, I would enthusiastically send my child to <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>.<br />

· The development office, parent association, and alumni association demonstrate<br />

effective efforts to keep tuition at a reasonable level.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

151


· The school provides appropriate allocation of financial resources for staffing,<br />

school programs, scholarships, and maintenance of safe facilities.<br />

5. Partnership with Parents<br />

· There is effective and timely communication of student progress and behavior.<br />

(report cards, conferences, parent meetings, e­mail, website)<br />

· The administration appropriately responds to parental concerns regarding<br />

curriculum, instruction, or an individual student's class schedule.<br />

· Parents are informed of events, activities, and major policy changes through the<br />

Dragon Parent, e­mail, and general mailings in an adequate and timely manner.<br />

· The administration has effective and fair systems (Dean's Office, Academic<br />

Office, Counselors) for resolving conflicts between students or between a student<br />

and a teacher.<br />

· Major changes in policies, personnel, and procedures are adequately explained<br />

in a timely manner.<br />

· The administration has adequately informed parents and students of emergency<br />

contingency plans and security procedures.<br />

· The norms for student behavior as stated in the Student Handbook are properly<br />

formed, explained, and maintained.<br />

· Counselors are available and responsive to students and parents for personal or<br />

family problems that concern the student's progress and/or development.<br />

· The College Counseling program provides parents and students with timely and<br />

accurate information for college planning.<br />

· Academic support services for students with special learning needs are readily<br />

available, well staffed, and responsive to students' and parents' concerns.<br />

6. Excellence in Teaching<br />

· Students are the first concern of our school's faculty and staff.<br />

· The students know that teachers in our school care about them as unique<br />

individuals.<br />

· I consider the teachers to be positive role models for the values I want my child<br />

to live by.<br />

· Class sizes are appropriate for learning and for forming a positive relationship<br />

between student and teacher.<br />

· Teachers use a variety of instructional techniques which are appropriate for the<br />

grade level and respond to a variety of student learning styles.<br />

· Teachers use a variety of assessment techniques (for example, portfolios,<br />

research papers, creative projects as well as tests) to measure student learning.<br />

· Teachers provide an atmosphere where students develop and demonstrate<br />

critical and analytical thinking skills and give sufficient feedback to the students<br />

on their development.<br />

· Teachers provide appropriate feedback for students to develop effective written<br />

and oral communication skills.<br />

· I am concerned that the school places too much pressure on students to achieve.<br />

· The teachers always extend themselves to assist students outside of class.<br />

· <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> offers sufficient elective courses beyond the college preparatory<br />

curriculum.<br />

How would you rate your child's educational experience in the following departments?<br />

· English<br />

· Mathematics<br />

· History & Social Science<br />

· Religious Studies<br />

· Technology<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

152


· Language<br />

· Science<br />

· Fine Arts<br />

· Performing Arts<br />

7. Mission<br />

· The school clearly communicates and operates out of its mission as a Catholic<br />

institution that promotes and effectively models Christian values.<br />

· The administration and faculty create a community which respects the dignity of<br />

all human persons, individual growth and development, and an appreciation and<br />

respect for diversity and difference.<br />

· The administration and faculty promote a learning environment conducive to high<br />

self­esteem and mutual respect between teachers and students.<br />

· The administration and faculty promote positive and healthy female and male<br />

attitudes appropriate for the challenges of adult life.<br />

· My child (our family) feels connected to the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> community.<br />

· I would enthusiastically recommend <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> to other families and children<br />

as an excellent educational experience.<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

153


Parent Survey Analysis<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

154


Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

155


Areas of Strength<br />

Academics<br />

Diversity<br />

Spirituality/Catholic teachings<br />

Teaching staff<br />

Athletics<br />

Sense of community<br />

Administration/leadership<br />

Safe environment<br />

Extra­curricular activities<br />

<strong>School</strong> culture, environment<br />

Areas of Growth<br />

Facility/Infra­structure<br />

Discipline<br />

Counseling<br />

Professional development of staff<br />

Finance/Resources<br />

Athletics<br />

Fine Arts<br />

Traffic/Parking<br />

Curriculum<br />

Campus Ministry<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

156


Alumni Survey Questions<br />

General Directions: Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following<br />

statements, using this scale:<br />

1. Strongly Disagree<br />

2. Somewhat Disagree<br />

3. Neither Agree nor Disagree<br />

4. Somewhat Agree<br />

5. Strongly Agree<br />

Your Experience as a Student<br />

1. Overall, <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> helped me become “a person of influence who is loving,<br />

open to growth, spiritual, intellectually competent, and a skilled leader committed<br />

to justice and peace.” (Taken from <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s mission statement)<br />

2. <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> provided me with an appropriate balance of academics, athletics,<br />

fine arts, and social experiences.<br />

3. Attending Masses at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> provided me with a positive experience of<br />

worship.<br />

4. My experiences of Community Service while at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd contributed to<br />

who I am today.<br />

5. My Campus Ministry retreat experiences were valuable to me spiritually and<br />

socially.<br />

6. I believe that the administration and faculty at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd create a<br />

community which respects the dignity of all humans, individual growth and<br />

development, and an appreciation and respect for diversity and difference.<br />

7. My teachers and counselors at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> were approachable, helpful, and<br />

genuinely cared for me as a person.<br />

8. My counselor(s) at <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> offered me helpful advice about my college<br />

and career choices.<br />

Using the 1­5 scale, please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following:<br />

1. “At <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd, I received an excellent education in ___”<br />

· English<br />

· Fine Arts<br />

· Foreign Language<br />

· Mathematics<br />

· Religious Studies<br />

· Science<br />

· Social Sciences (History and Government)<br />

· Technology<br />

2. “At <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd, I had positive experiences in __ (activities below)”<br />

· Athletics<br />

· Drama (plays, musicals)<br />

· Music (band, orchestra, chorus)<br />

· Student Government<br />

· Yearbook/Newspaper<br />

· Other Student Clubs<br />

· Spirit Week & Dances<br />

3. My <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> education prepared me to excel in my college coursework.<br />

4. My <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> education prepared me to succeed in my career pursuits.<br />

Your Current Involvement and Perception:<br />

Using the 1­5 scale, please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following:<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

157


1. <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd clearly communicates its mission as a Catholic institution that<br />

promotes and effectively models Christian values.<br />

2. The current administration and faculty at <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd promote a quality<br />

learning environment that fosters high self­esteem and mutual respect between<br />

teachers and students.<br />

3. I would recommend attending <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> to the young people of my<br />

community.<br />

4. I still feel I am part of the <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> community overall.<br />

5. I enjoy reading the alumni magazine (The Dragon).<br />

6. The e­mails that I receive from <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd and the Alumni Office make me<br />

feel connected to the current life of <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong>.<br />

7. I am a member of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s online alumni community.<br />

8. I went to my last class reunion.<br />

9. I have attended an alumni event or visited campus in the last two years.<br />

10. In the last two years, I have volunteered my time and/or contributed financially<br />

to <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd.<br />

11. I would like to be more involved with <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd, given the right<br />

opportunity.<br />

12. My experiences with <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd’s Alumni and Development staff have<br />

been positive.<br />

Strengths of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd:<br />

Academics<br />

Athletics<br />

Preparation for college<br />

Diversity of student body<br />

Teaching of spiritual values<br />

Sense of community; place for everyone<br />

<strong>High</strong> standards and expectations of<br />

students<br />

Loyalty, pride, school spirit, personal<br />

connections<br />

Quality of teachers, especially English &<br />

Drama programs<br />

Wide variety of clubs and extracurricular<br />

activities<br />

Areas for Growth of <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd:<br />

Improve facilities<br />

Lower the tuition and clarify how funds<br />

raised are used to help students<br />

Increase the diversity at the school<br />

Strengthen the religious/spiritual identity of<br />

the school<br />

Improve the academics, curriculum, and<br />

quality of teachers<br />

Improve the college and career aspects of<br />

the Counseling Department<br />

Increase connectedness with the<br />

surrounding community more<br />

Increase community service opportunities<br />

Increase ability to use technology effectively<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

158


Alumni Survey Analysis<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

159


Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

160


Appendix B<br />

Advanced Placement Results<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

TT PASSED TT PASSED TT PASSED TT PASSED TT PASSED TT PASSED TT PASSED<br />

ART­GENERAL 13 62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

BIOLOGY 60 82% 59 80% 58 62% 58 55% 58 50% 59 59% 55 51%<br />

CALCULUS AB 63 35% 63 62% 80 66% 85 32% 77 35% 72 18% 86 35%<br />

CALCULUS BC 21 81% 15 80% 19 95% 20 65% 20 80% 22 77% 17 88%<br />

CHEMISTRY 0 0% 1 100% 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

COMP SCI A 10 50% 15 80% 5 100% 7 71% 6 100% 9 67% 4 100%<br />

COMP SCI AB 16 100% 17 88% 9 100% 9 89% 10 90% 10 90% 8 75%<br />

ECON­MAC 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

ENG LIT/COMP 42 95% 37 92% 32 97% 34 100% 33 85% 44 100% 35 91%<br />

ENVIR. SCI. 46 59% 41 73% 49 59% 45 62% 47 53% 43 28% 49 51%<br />

FRENCH LANG 8 75% 14 50% 12 42% 12 25% 10 40% 25 12% 12 25%<br />

GERMAN LANG 0 0% 3 0% 1 100% 3 67% 0 0% 5 20% 0 0%<br />

GOV & POL COMP 44 82% 48 83% 69 78% 57 89% 45 61% 54 69% 34 71%<br />

GOV & POL US 43 79% 49 84% 71 83% 60 82% 47 66% 52 79% 37 81%<br />

MUSIC THEORY 1 100% 2 100% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%<br />

PHYSICS B 1 100% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

PHYSICS C­E&M 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 100% 4 0% 0 0% 4 50%<br />

PHYSICS C­MECH 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 3 100% 4 0% 0 0% 4 75%<br />

PSYCHOLOGY 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 58 74%<br />

SPANISH LANG 18 94% 48 69% 36 67% 24 92% 21 71% 24 75% 22 45%<br />

SPANISH LIT 7 57% 4 75% 9 56% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

STATISTICS 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

STUDIO ART­DRAW 0 0% 12 92% 10 90% 12 50% 6 83% 10 60% 5 60%<br />

STUDIO ART­2D 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100%<br />

US HISTORY 61 85% 72 85% 58 86% 54 80% 53 64% 64 81% 66 60%<br />

TOTAL 454 74% 502 78% 522 75% 493 68% 441 58% 495 60% 498 60%<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

161


NEDT Program Score Reports<br />

Adm. Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Graduation Class 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Composite 85 82 82 78 82 78 78 80<br />

Eng. Usage 79 77 75 71 75 73 69 72<br />

Math Usage 95 91 95 89 94 89 91 91<br />

Nat. Sci Reading 69 64 61 55 64 59 52 61<br />

Soc St Reading 74 71 71 55 71 58 60 62<br />

Group Size 333 306 289 301 283 323 274 325<br />

National Merit Recognition<br />

Class<br />

National<br />

Merit Semifinalist<br />

National<br />

Merit<br />

Commended<br />

National<br />

Achievement<br />

Semi­finalist<br />

National<br />

Achievement<br />

Commended<br />

National<br />

Hispanic<br />

Scholar<br />

National Hispanic<br />

Honorable<br />

Mention<br />

Total<br />

1994 4 22 4 5 4 0 39<br />

1995 6 21 0 8 0 0 35<br />

1996 5 16 0 8 0 0 29<br />

1997 6 25 1 0 1 0 33<br />

1998 6 18 2 6 2 0 34<br />

1999 5 27 0 3 2 0 37<br />

2000 10 15 1 3 4 0 33<br />

2001 7 24 2 1 3 2 39<br />

2002 3 22 5 9 3 2 44<br />

2003 7 15 4 0 7 1 34<br />

2004 2 16 2 0 3 0 23<br />

2005 2 16 0 2 1 2 23<br />

2006 1 9 3 0 2 0 15<br />

2007 1 10 4 0 2 0 17<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

162


SAT Historical Data<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

BOD ­ VERBAL MEAN 582 589 586 585 568 552<br />

CA ­ VERBAL MEAN 498 496 499 501 504 501<br />

BOD ­ MATH MEAN 576 589 589 587 577 557<br />

CA ­ MATH MEAN 517 517 519 519 522 518<br />

BOD ­ WRITING MEAN 559<br />

CA ­ WRITING MEAN 501<br />

HSPT Historical Results<br />

Adm. Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Graduation<br />

Class 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Composite 85 82 82 78 82 78 78 80<br />

English Usage 79 77 75 71 75 73 69 72<br />

Math Usage 95 91 95 89 94 89 91 91<br />

National<br />

Science<br />

Reading 69 64 61 55 64 59 52 61<br />

Social Studies<br />

Reading 74 71 71 55 71 58 60 62<br />

Group Size 333 306 289 301 283 323 274 325<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

163


Appendix C<br />

Clubs and Organizations<br />

Clubs<br />

Amnesty International<br />

Animee<br />

Asian Student Alliance<br />

Badminton<br />

Black Student Union<br />

Chess<br />

Christian Peer Ministry<br />

Computer Gamers<br />

Dance/Step<br />

Developer’s<br />

Disney<br />

Earthbound<br />

Esoterikos<br />

Esperanto Union<br />

eTech<br />

Film<br />

French Society<br />

Inventor’s<br />

Key<br />

Knitting Nation<br />

Little Italy<br />

Math<br />

Middle Eastern Dance<br />

Mock Trial<br />

Multicultural<br />

Native American Pride<br />

Outdoor Adventure<br />

Ping Pong<br />

Polynesian<br />

Ski<br />

Tzedakah<br />

Vegetarian<br />

Organizations<br />

California Scholarship Federation<br />

Close­Up<br />

Crozier<br />

Dragon Ambassadors<br />

Junior Statesmen of America<br />

Muse<br />

National Honor Society<br />

Special Service Projects<br />

Yearbook<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

164


Athletic Program<br />

Fall Sports Teams<br />

# of<br />

coaches<br />

# of players on<br />

roster<br />

Average<br />

Team Cum<br />

GPA<br />

Football Teams<br />

Varsity Football 9 35 2.89<br />

JV Football 4 24 2.72<br />

Freshmen Football 4 45 2.93<br />

Volleyball Teams<br />

Varsity Volleyball 3 14 3.64<br />

JV Volleyball 2 13 3.64<br />

Freshmen Volleyball 2 13 3.25<br />

Water Polo Teams<br />

Varsity Men's Waterpolo 1 15 3.45<br />

Varsity Women's<br />

Waterpolo 1 15 3.64<br />

JV Men's Waterpolo 2 14 3.45<br />

JV Women's Waterpolo 2 15 3.31<br />

Women's Golf 1 12 3.45<br />

Varsity Women's Tennis 1 31 3.59<br />

Cross Country 2 52 3.55<br />

Winter Sports Teams<br />

# of<br />

coaches<br />

# of players on<br />

roster<br />

Average<br />

Team Cum<br />

GPA<br />

Men's Baskeball<br />

Teams<br />

Varsity Men's Basketball 4 15 3.19<br />

JV Men's Basketball 3 13 2.95<br />

Freshmen Men's<br />

Basketball 1 15 3.03<br />

Women's Baskeball<br />

Teams<br />

Varsity Basketball 2 13 3.14<br />

JV Women's Basketball 2 13 3.04<br />

Freshmen Basketball 1 6 3.03<br />

Men's Soccer Teams<br />

Varsity Men's Soccer 2 22 3.39<br />

JV Men's Soccer 1 17 3.33<br />

Freshmen Men's Soccer 1 17 3.16<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

165


Women's Soccer<br />

Teams<br />

Varsity Women's Soccer 2 23 3.68<br />

JV Women's Soccer 1 17 3.25<br />

Freshmen Women's<br />

Soccer 1 16 3.50<br />

Spring Sports Teams<br />

# of<br />

coaches<br />

# of players on<br />

roster<br />

Average<br />

Team Cum<br />

GPA<br />

Baseball Teams<br />

Varsity Baseball 5 21 3.10<br />

JV Baseball 2 15 3.13<br />

Freshmen Baseball 2 17 3.22<br />

Softball Teams<br />

Varsity Softball 2 13 3.42<br />

JV Softball 2 20 3.38<br />

Men's Lacrosse<br />

Teams<br />

Varsity Men's Lacrosse 1 24 3.12<br />

JV Men's Lacrosse 1 20 3.15<br />

Women's Lacrosse<br />

Teams<br />

Varsity Women's<br />

Lacrosse 2 19 3.60<br />

JV Women's Lacrosse 1 15 3.48<br />

Men's Golf Teams<br />

Varsity Golf 2 18 3.36<br />

JV Golf 1<br />

Track & Field 6 86 3.15<br />

Swimming & Diving 4 49 3.51<br />

Varsity Men's Tennis 1 24 3.42<br />

JV Cheer 1 10 3.05<br />

Varsity Cheer 1 14 3.33<br />

89 850 3.37<br />

Total<br />

Coaching<br />

Positions<br />

Total Participation<br />

Roster Slots<br />

Avg. BOD<br />

Athletes GPA<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

166


Athletic Enrollment Breakdown<br />

Total Females Enrollment 573<br />

% of Female Students<br />

Participating<br />

Females Participating in<br />

Athletics 304 53%<br />

Freshmen Female Athletes 100 17%<br />

Sophomore Female Athletes 63 11%<br />

Junior Female Athletes 74 13%<br />

Senior Female Athletes 67 12%<br />

Male Student Enrollment 579<br />

% of Male Students<br />

Participating<br />

Males Participating in Athletics 346 60%<br />

Freshmen Male Athletes 128 22%<br />

Sophomore Male Athletes 79 14%<br />

Junior Male Athletes 81 14%<br />

Senior Male Athletes 58 10%<br />

Student Enrollment 1152<br />

% of Students<br />

Participating<br />

Participation Roster<br />

Opportunities 850 74%<br />

Students Participating in<br />

Athletics 650 56%<br />

Freshmen Participating in<br />

Athletics 228 20%<br />

Sophomores Participating in<br />

Athletics 142 12%<br />

Juniors Participating in<br />

Athletics 155 13%<br />

Seniors Participating in<br />

Athletics 125 11%<br />

Multi­Sport Athletes<br />

Dual Sport Athletes 168<br />

Three Sport Athletes 6<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

167


Campus Ministry and Christian Service<br />

(All figures are averages over last five years.)<br />

Retreat Attendance<br />

Freshman Retreat “Becoming”<br />

Sophomore Immersion<br />

Junior Overnight Retreat “Values”<br />

Senior Overnight Retreat “Journey<br />

Student Retreat Team<br />

(staff for frosh/soph)<br />

Faculty Retreat Team<br />

(staff for Jr & Sr overnight retreats)<br />

100% attendance<br />

100% attendance<br />

40% attendance<br />

60% attendance<br />

100 members<br />

20 faculty<br />

Yearly Liturgies<br />

All school Liturgies 8 (Entire student body & fac. =<br />

1250)<br />

Class Liturgies 4 (Entire class = approx. 285)<br />

Weekday mass weekly (app. 8 faculty)<br />

Charity Drives<br />

2/year<br />

Dollar Days<br />

9/year<br />

2006­07 Funds raised $17,000<br />

2005­06 Funds raised $18,000<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

168


Appendix D<br />

Applicant <strong>School</strong>s<br />

Catholic <strong>School</strong>s<br />

All Saints, Hayward<br />

Assumption, San Leandro<br />

Corpus Christi, Oakland<br />

Holy Spirit, Fremont<br />

Our Lady of Grace, Castro Valley<br />

<strong>School</strong> of the Madeleine, Berkeley<br />

St. Anthony, Oakland<br />

St. Barnabas, Alameda<br />

St. Bede, Hayward<br />

Other Private <strong>School</strong>s<br />

The Academy, Oakland<br />

Beacon, Oakland<br />

Bentley, Oakland<br />

Berkeley Montessori, Berkeley<br />

French­American <strong>School</strong>, Oakland<br />

Head Royce, Oakland<br />

St. Elizabeth, Oakland<br />

St. Felicitas, San Leandro<br />

St. Jarlath, Oakland<br />

St. Joachim, Hayward<br />

St. John, San Lorenzo<br />

St. Joseph, Alameda<br />

St. Joseph the Worker, Pinole<br />

St. Lawrence O’Toole, Oakland<br />

Redwood Christian, Castro Valley<br />

Redwood Day <strong>School</strong>, Oakland<br />

St. Paul’s Episcopal, Oakland<br />

Zion Lutheran, Oakland<br />

St. Leander, San Leandro<br />

St. Leo, Oakland<br />

St. Martin de Porres, Oakland<br />

St. Raymond, Dublin<br />

St. Michael, Livermore<br />

St, Philip Neri, Alameda<br />

St. Theresa, Oakland<br />

Public <strong>School</strong>s<br />

Bancroft Middle <strong>School</strong>, San Leandro<br />

Hillcrest Middle <strong>School</strong>, Oakland<br />

Lincoln Middle <strong>School</strong>, Alameda<br />

Montera Middle <strong>School</strong>, Oakland<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

169


2007 Freshmen Applicants<br />

Applicants %<br />

Catholic <strong>School</strong>s 216 41%<br />

Other Private <strong>School</strong>s 174 32%<br />

Public <strong>School</strong>s 114 21%<br />

Unspecified 33 6%<br />

Total applicants 537 100%<br />

Tuition History 2001­2008<br />

Year Fees Total Tuition Total Increase % Increase<br />

2001/02 $300 $8,150 $850 11.6<br />

2002/03 $550 $8,800 $650 8.8<br />

2003/04 $550 $9,200 $400 4.5<br />

2004/05 $750 $10,500 $1,300 14.1<br />

2005/06 $750 $11,250 $750 7.1<br />

2006/07 $750 $11,950 $700 6.2<br />

2007/08 $750 $12,600 $650 5.4<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

170


Information for College Admissions Officers<br />

September 2006<br />

THE SCHOOL: <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> is a fully accredited, Catholic<br />

coeducational college preparatory high school with an extensive honors and<br />

Advanced Placement program. The school, founded in 1951, is located in<br />

Oakland, California.<br />

In its Mission statement, the school identifies itself as a unique and diverse<br />

community which strives to develop young people of competence, conscience and<br />

compassion. The <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd community is representative of the multicultural<br />

population of the San Francisco Bay Area. The student population is<br />

comprised of 14% African American, 22% multi­racial, 13% Asian/Pacific<br />

Islander, 5% Hispanic and 46% Caucasian. Approximately 20% of O’Dowd<br />

students received nearly $1,000,000 in financial aid. The present enrollment is<br />

1164. Applicants for admission at the 9 th and 10 th grade levels are required to take<br />

an examination for entrance and placement.<br />

THE FACULTY: The faculty and administration are fully credentialed and hold<br />

numerous advanced degrees. Subject area expertise and a dedication to<br />

implementation of effective pedagogy are hallmarks of O’Dowd educators.<br />

THE CURRICULUM: <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> offers a 4 year liberal arts college<br />

preparatory education. The following required courses combine with electives for<br />

a total of 240 credits for graduation:<br />

Religion 4 years Science 2.5 years<br />

English 4 years Foreign Language 2 years<br />

Social Studies 3 years Physical Education 2 years<br />

Mathematics 3 years Fine Arts 1 year<br />

There are 13 honors courses offered in Mathematics, English, languages other<br />

than English, Chemistry, Physics and Geo­history, beginning in the 9 th grade.<br />

There are 15 Advanced Placement courses offered starting at the sophomore level.<br />

The full and diverse curriculum provides a variety of elective offerings.<br />

EXTRA­CURRICULAR: Students participate in a full co­curricular program<br />

including 38 athletic teams, 55 clubs, three bands, an orchestra, a choir and a<br />

comprehensive theater arts program. In addition to required service hours, many<br />

students are active in community volunteer programs and our Campus Ministry<br />

program.<br />

National <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> Recognition: In 2001, the Western Association of<br />

<strong>School</strong>s and Colleges awarded <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> the maximum<br />

six­year accreditation. The United States Department of Education has<br />

selected <strong>Bishop</strong> <strong>O'Dowd</strong> as a Blue Ribbon <strong>School</strong><br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

171


Profile of the Class of 2006<br />

Number of Graduates: 270<br />

Number attending<br />

college: 264<br />

SAT SCORES: (over a five­year period)<br />

Verbal<br />

Math<br />

<strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd 576 580<br />

California 501 518<br />

Students Tested 248 248<br />

Writing<br />

559<br />

One year only<br />

SAT SUBJECT TESTS MEAN SCORES: (over a five­year period)<br />

U.S. History 588 Literature 563<br />

Bio – Ecological 596 Math IIC 636<br />

Bio – Molecular 630 Spanish 567<br />

Chemistry 575 Spanish List 556<br />

French 583 Writing 614<br />

SAT II MEAN SCORES: Students who wrote both SAT and Subject tests (183) (over a five<br />

year period)<br />

Verbal<br />

Math<br />

577 579<br />

ADVANCED PLACEMENT EXAMS: Over a five year period, <strong>Bishop</strong> O’Dowd students passed the AP<br />

exam at a rate of 71%. On average, 500 exams are written each year. AP courses are offered in the<br />

following subject areas:<br />

U.S. History Government and Politics/ U.S. Government/Comparative<br />

Biology Computer Science A Computer Science B<br />

English Lit & Comp. Environmental Science French Language<br />

Psychology Calculus AB Calculus BC<br />

Spanish Language Spanish Literature Studio Art<br />

COLLEGE PLACEMENT: In 2006, 92% of graduates enrolled in a four­year college, 6% enrolled in<br />

two­year colleges. The remaining graduates were undecided. In the past two years, some students were<br />

admitted to the following schools:<br />

Academy of Art University Coastal Carolina University Marymount Manhattan U. of British Columbia<br />

American University Colgate Massachusetts Institute of Tech. University of California<br />

Arizona State Colorado College Middlebury Berkeley<br />

Baldwin Wallace Columbia Michigan State Davis<br />

Barnard Connecticut College Mills College Irvine<br />

Bennington Cornell College Montana State Los Angeles<br />

Boise State Cornell University New Mexico Tech. Merced<br />

Boston College Dartmouth New York University Riverside<br />

Boston Conservatory DePaul Northeastern San Diego<br />

Boston University Dickenson Northwestern Santa Barbara<br />

Bowdoin Dillard Northern Illinois University Santa Cruz<br />

Brown Dominican Notre Dame de Namur University of Chicago<br />

Bryn Mawr Emerson College Oberlin U. of Colorado Boulder<br />

Bucknell Evergreen State Occidental University of Hawaii<br />

Cal Lutheran Expressions for New Media Oregon State U. of Illinois, Chicago<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

172


CCA Fisk Pacific University (OR) University of Maine<br />

California State University Fordham Pepperdine University of Maryland<br />

Channel Islands Franklin Marshall Pitzer U. of Massachusetts, Amherst<br />

Chico George Washington Pomona University of Michigan<br />

Dominguez Hills Georgetown Portland State University of Montana<br />

Fresno Gonzaga Purdue University of Nevada Reno<br />

Fullerton Goucher Rutgers University of N. Carolina CH<br />

Hayward/East Bay Grinnell St. Andrew’s University of Oregon<br />

Humboldt Hamilton St. John’s University of Pacific<br />

Monterey Bay Harvard St. Joseph University University of Portland<br />

Northridge Hawaii Pacific St. Mary’s, CA University of Puget Sound<br />

Pomona Hofstra Santa Clara University University of Redlands<br />

Sacramento Holy Cross Sarah Lawrence University of Rochester<br />

San Diego Holy Names Scripps University of San Diego<br />

San Francisco Howard Seattle University University of San Francisco<br />

San Jose Ithaca Skidmore University of Southern Calif<br />

San Luis Obispo John Carroll University Smith University of Utah<br />

Sonoma Johns Hopkins Southern Methodist University of Utrecht<br />

Stanislaus Johnson & Wales Spelman University of Vermont<br />

Carleton Kalamazoo College Stanford University of Washington<br />

Case Western Langston University Syracuse Villanova<br />

Chapman Lewis & Clark Trinity Wheaton<br />

Chicago State U. Loyola College Tufts Whitman<br />

Claremont McKenna Loyola Marymount Tulane Whittier<br />

Clark Macalester University of Arizona Williamette<br />

Clemson Marymount University of Arkansas Xavier University<br />

Focus on Learning – Final Draft_v3<br />

September 22, 2007<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!