Report on Injuries in Racing Greyhounds (2005 ... - Grey2K USA
Report on Injuries in Racing Greyhounds (2005 ... - Grey2K USA Report on Injuries in Racing Greyhounds (2005 ... - Grey2K USA
REPORT TIMEFRAME Injury records included in this report cover the following timeframes: Hinsdale Greyhound Park: Jan. 1 – Dec. 17, 2005 Jan. 1 – Dec. 20, 2006 Seabrook Greyhound Park: Jan. 4 – Dec. 27, 2005 Apr. 22 – Sept. 2, 2006 The Lodge at Belmont: Jun. 30 – Sept. 15, 2006 (not in operation in 2005) COMPARISON OF INJURIES AT NEW HAMPSHIRE DOG TRACKS Records indicate that more injuries occurred at Seabrook than at Hinsdale, even though Seabrook was only in operation for 17 months in 2005 and 2006, while Hinsdale was in operation for 24 months. Injuries by Track Injuries 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 332 Injuries 353 Injuries 31 Injuries Belmont Hinsdale Seabrook Commercial Dog Racing: A
AVERAGE INJURIES PER MONTH On average, Seabrook reported fifty percent more injuries per month than Hinsdale, and twice as many per month as Belmont. Injuries per Month (Avg.) Seabrook 21 / month Hinsdale 14 / month Belmont 10 / month 0 5 10 15 20 25 Commercial Dog Racing: A
- Page 1 and 2: A Report to the Ne
- Page 3 and 4: GREY2K USA February 1, 2007 Directo
- Page 5: REPORT: Dogs Injured While Racing i
- Page 9 and 10: INJURY EXAMPLES On Octobe
- Page 11 and 12: APPENDIX B: Sample Injury R
- Page 13 and 14: Sample Injury Report</stron
- Page 15 and 16: Sample Injury Report</stron
- Page 17 and 18: Sample Injury Report</stron
- Page 19 and 20: Sample Injury Report</stron
- Page 21 and 22: APPENDIX C: Photos of New Hampshire
- Page 23 and 24: Photo by New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel
- Page 25 and 26: Photo by New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel
- Page 27 and 28: Photo by New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel
- Page 29 and 30: Photo by New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel
- Page 31 and 32: Photo by New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel
- Page 33 and 34: Photo by New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel
- Page 35 and 36: APPENDIX D: Report
- Page 37 and 38: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 39 and 40: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 41 and 42: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 43 and 44: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 45 and 46: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 47 and 48: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 49 and 50: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 51 and 52: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 53 and 54: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
- Page 55 and 56: DATE DOG NAME TRACK INJURY TYPE INJ
REPORT TIMEFRAME<br />
Injury records <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this report cover the follow<strong>in</strong>g timeframes:<br />
H<strong>in</strong>sdale Greyhound Park: Jan. 1 – Dec. 17, <strong>2005</strong><br />
Jan. 1 – Dec. 20, 2006<br />
Seabrook Greyhound Park: Jan. 4 – Dec. 27, <strong>2005</strong><br />
Apr. 22 – Sept. 2, 2006<br />
The Lodge at Belm<strong>on</strong>t: Jun. 30 – Sept. 15, 2006 (not <strong>in</strong> operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
COMPARISON OF INJURIES AT NEW HAMPSHIRE DOG TRACKS<br />
Records <strong>in</strong>dicate that more <strong>in</strong>juries occurred at Seabrook than at H<strong>in</strong>sdale, even though Seabrook was<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> operati<strong>on</strong> for 17 m<strong>on</strong>ths <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong> and 2006, while H<strong>in</strong>sdale was <strong>in</strong> operati<strong>on</strong> for 24 m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
<strong>Injuries</strong> by Track<br />
<strong>Injuries</strong><br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
332 <strong>Injuries</strong><br />
353 <strong>Injuries</strong><br />
31 <strong>Injuries</strong><br />
Belm<strong>on</strong>t H<strong>in</strong>sdale Seabrook<br />
Commercial Dog Rac<strong>in</strong>g: A <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> to the New Hampshire General Court 2
Change language