Left Brain - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

Left Brain - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research Left Brain - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

dbsvresearch.com
from dbsvresearch.com More from this publisher
20.11.2014 Views

Equity Strategy and Large Cap Stock Picks Brainwaves DBS Vickers’ best ideas from across the region Left Brain Focuses on logical thinking and analysis 2Q 2009 DBS Group Research 27 March 2009 “In Singapore, this research report or research analyses may only be distributed to Institutional Investors, Expert Investors or Accredited Investors as defined in the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore.”

Equity Strategy and Large Cap Stock Picks<br />

<strong>Brain</strong>waves<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>’ best ideas from across <strong>the</strong> region<br />

<strong>Left</strong> <strong>Brain</strong><br />

Focuses on logical thinking and analysis<br />

2Q 2009<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

27 March 2009<br />

“In Singapore, this research report or research analyses may<br />

only be distributed to Institutional Investors, Expert Investors<br />

or Accredited Investors as defined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> and<br />

Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore.”


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Directory<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Directory<br />

Analyst Sector E-mail<br />

Regional<br />

Timothy Wong Head, Group <strong>Research</strong> timothywongkc@dbsvickers.com<br />

Joanne Goh Regional Equity Strategist joannegohsc@dbs.com<br />

Paul Yong, CFA Singapore & China Industrial & Transport paulyong@dbsvickers.com<br />

Ben Santoso Regional Plantation bensantoso@dbsvickers.com<br />

Lim Sue Lin Singapore and Malaysia Banking suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Hong Kong / China<br />

Alice Hui CFA Acting Co-Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Consumer alice_hui@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Gideon Lo CFA Acting Co-Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Oil & Petrochemicals, gideon_lo@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Pharmaceuticals, Shipping<br />

Carol Wu China Properties carol_wu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Dennis Lam Electronics & Technology dennis_lam@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Helen Wang Basic Materials helen_wang@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Jasmine Lai Banking & Finance jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Jeff Yau CFA Conglomerates, Property jeff_yau@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Mavis Hui Media & General Retail mavis_hui@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Patricia Yeung Industrials patricia_yeung@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Rachel Miu Infrastructure, Machinery, Agriculture Rachel_miu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Steven Liu CFA Software & Telecom steven_liu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Indonesia<br />

Agus Pramono, CFA Strategy, Banking, Consumer, agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Conglomerate/Automotive, Cement<br />

Yusuf Ade Winoto, CFA Basic Materials, Oil, Gas & Energy, Construction yusuf.winoto@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Telecommunications, Plantation research@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Malaysia<br />

Wong Ming Tek Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy mingtek@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Goh Yin Foo CFA Retail/ Technical Product yinfoo@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

June Ng Power, Oil & Gas, Conglomerates, REITs june@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Tjen San Construction, Concessionaires tjensan@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Yee Mei Hui Gaming, Property meihui@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Small-Mid Caps, IPO/ Retail Product general@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Consumer, Logistic, Motor, Plantation,<br />

Shipping, Steel, Telecommunications,<br />

Technology Services<br />

Singapore<br />

Janice Chua Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy, Industrials janicechua@dbsvickers.com<br />

Chong Wee Lee, CFA Industrials weelee@dbsvickers.com<br />

Ho Pei Hwa Industrials peihwa@dbsvickers.com<br />

Lock Mun Yee Property, Reits mumyee@dbsvickers.com<br />

Adrian Chua Property adrianchua@dbsvickers.com<br />

Derek Tan Reits derektan@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jeremy Thia Industrials, Property jeremythia@dbsvickers.com<br />

Andy Sim, CFA Consumer andysim@dbsvickers.com<br />

Patrick Xu Consumer patrickxu@dbsvickers.com<br />

Tan Ai Teng Electronics aiteng@dbsvickers.com<br />

Sachin Mittal Telecom sachin@dbsvickers.com<br />

Suvro Sarkar Electronics, Industrials survo@dbsvickers.com<br />

Thailand<br />

Chanpen Sirithanarattanakul Head of <strong>Research</strong> chanpens@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Property, REITs, Transportation<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai Telecom, Media chirasitv@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Vichitr Kuladejkhuna CFA Building Materials, Energy, Utilities, vichitrk@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Petrochemicals, Chemicals<br />

Sugittra Kongkhajornkidsuk Banks, <strong>Securities</strong> sugittrak@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Parin Kitchatornpitak Automotive, Commerce, Electronics parink@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Food & Beverage<br />

Nalyne Viriyasathien Construction Materials, Food and Beverage, nalynev@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Health Care, Transport<br />

Korea<br />

Lee Eun Young Basic Materials, Utilities eunyoung@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jung Sung Hoon Consumer sunghoon@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jay (Jaehak) Kim Automotive Jay_kim@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 2<br />

“Recipients of this report, received from <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd<br />

(“<strong>DBS</strong>VR”), are to contact <strong>DBS</strong>VR at +65 6398 7954 in respect of any matters arising from<br />

or in connection with this report.”


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Strategy Overview<br />

Market Data 4<br />

Stock Profiles Key Data 5<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity 6<br />

Regional Data Monitor 34<br />

Country Assessments & Stock Profiles<br />

Singapore Trading opportunity 37<br />

Ascendas REIT Sitting steady 52<br />

City Developments Singapore property proxy 54<br />

OCBC Sing-Malay bank proxy 56<br />

SembCorp Marine Favored rig builder 58<br />

SPH Attractive valuations 60<br />

Venture Corporation Outstanding yield 62<br />

Hong Kong / China Seek value amidst volatility 64<br />

China Communications Construction Value play 76<br />

China Mobile Fundamentals remain solid 78<br />

HSBC Broken hearts 80<br />

Malaysia Value hunting 82<br />

IJM Corp Contract visibility improving 96<br />

PLUS Expressway Steady as she goes 98<br />

Thailand Lower downside risks 100<br />

Advanced Info Service Defensive, with guaranteed yields 114<br />

Banpu Solid growth 116<br />

Bangkok Bank Strong balance sheet 118<br />

Indonesia<br />

Election season<br />

120<br />

Tambang Batubara The heat is still on! 128<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong><br />

Singapore l Hong Kong / China l Thailand l Malaysia l Indonesia<br />

Page 3


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Market Data<br />

Market Data<br />

Relative Valuations & Performance<br />

Stock Market Valuation – March 2009<br />

Market Cap EPS Growth (%) PE (x)<br />

(US$ bn) 2008 2009F 2010F 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

Hong Kong 534 (35.7) (5.9) 17.4 11.5 12.2 10.4<br />

China 754 (15.6) (1.5) 24.4 13.9 14.1 11.4<br />

Singapore 216 (0.6) (15.7) 7.3 8.4 9.9 9.2<br />

Malaysia 170 0.5 (8.3) 6.5 11.1 12.1 11.3<br />

Philippines * 50 (12.5) 7.4 11.1 11.1 10.4 9.3<br />

Thailand 66 (29.5) (3.6) 7.2 8.5 8.3 7.3<br />

Indonesia 89 (0.3) (7.7) 1.7 10.9 9.7 9.5<br />

Korea * 429 (32.7) (2.0) 48.5 13.2 13.2 8.9<br />

Taiwan * 357 (54.0) (56.6) 208.6 17.5 42.8 14.5<br />

Prices are as at 19 Mar 2009<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> coverage, except * markets from Datastream Consensus<br />

Market Performance (% change) – 19 March 2009<br />

Singapore (STI)<br />

Hong Kong (HSI)<br />

China (HSCCI/HSCEI)<br />

Kuala Lumpur (KLCI)<br />

Bangkok (SET)<br />

Philippines (PCOMP)<br />

Jakarta (JCI)<br />

Taiwan (TAIEX)<br />

Korea (KOSPI)<br />

Tokyo (Nikkei 225)<br />

New York (Dow Jones)<br />

-20.0 -15.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0<br />

1-month ago 3-months ago YTD<br />

Page 4


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Stock Profiles Key Data<br />

Stock Profiles<br />

Key Data<br />

Bloomberg Code<br />

Company<br />

Price & Index<br />

(19 Mar 09)<br />

Mkt Cap<br />

(USDm)<br />

PE<br />

09 (x)<br />

PE<br />

10 (x)<br />

EPS CAGR<br />

08-10 (%)<br />

EV/EBITDA<br />

09 (x)<br />

P/BV<br />

09 (x)<br />

ROE<br />

09 (%)<br />

SINGAPORE STI 1,585<br />

AREIT SP Ascendas REIT ** S$1.15 1,277 13.0 * 10.5 * (11) 14.0 0.7 6.8<br />

CIT SP City Development S$5.01 3,013 8.4 7.7 3 9.2 0.8 9.6<br />

OCBC SP OCBC Bank S$4.53 9,368 10.2 9.2 1 n.a. 0.9 9.5<br />

SMM SP SembCorp Marine S$1.49 2,042 6.7 6.0 4 5.2 1.9 31.8<br />

SPH SP SPH S$2.49 2,622 9.2 10.1 (8) 6.7 1.9 20.5<br />

VMS SP Venture Corporation S$4.72 856 7.1 6.7 8 3.3 0.7 9.5<br />

* DPU<br />

** FY10 & FY11 estimates<br />

HONG KONG HSI / HSCEI 13131 / 7731<br />

1800 HK China Comm Construction HK$8.45 4,825<br />

13.6 10.4 29 7.6 2.0 15.3<br />

941 HK China Mobile HK$66.70 172,596 9.6 8.8 9 4.0 2.4 26.7<br />

5 HK HSBC (Sell)<br />

HK$41.50 92,086 12.5 11.3 1 nm 0.9 6.9<br />

# H share market cap<br />

MALAYSIA KLCI 852<br />

IJM MK IJM Corporation ** RM3.80 980 11.6 9.6 17 9.0 0.7 6.3<br />

PLUS MK Plus Expressway RM2.88 3,942 12.6 12.0 6 8.8 2.4 19.6<br />

** FY10 & FY11 estimates<br />

THAILAND SET 428<br />

ADVANC TB Advanced Info Service Bt84.50 7,260 14.1 13.3 7 5.6 3.5 24.6<br />

BANPU TB Banpu Bt210.00 1,656 4.5 5.4 10 3.1 1.1 27.7<br />

BBL TB Bangkok Bank Bt76.50 4,236 8.2 8.0 (5) na 0.8 9.9<br />

INDONESIA JCI INDEX 1,342<br />

PTBA IJ Tambang Batubara IDR6,550 1,268 5.6 11.2 (11) 3.2 2.6 54.6<br />

Page 5


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Asia Equity<br />

The bumpy road to recovery<br />

The market rally driven by <strong>the</strong> US troubled asset buyout<br />

plan has arrived earlier than we had expected. Positive<br />

momentum could be sustained in <strong>the</strong> second quarter<br />

amid constructive US Treasury marketing effort and short<br />

covering against a backdrop of prevalent risk aversion.<br />

Notwithstanding <strong>the</strong> lack of fundamental support, bear<br />

market rallies can deliver respectable returns, powered by<br />

<strong>the</strong> normalization of excessive equity risk premium.<br />

Abundant USD liquidity from FED injection and low<br />

interest rates are adding fuel to <strong>the</strong> fire.<br />

An economic recovery should be on its way with all <strong>the</strong> aggressive stimulus and<br />

monetary easing policies. The remaining catalyst should be when banks start to<br />

lend again. Trying to pinpoint <strong>the</strong> timing of recovery remains challenging given<br />

<strong>the</strong> magnitude and scope of this downturn. Never<strong>the</strong>less, Asia's sound<br />

fundamentals and attractive valuations relative to potential growth , buttress<br />

our conviction that a recovery in Asia is not a question of if, but when.<br />

The more broadly investable markets should benefit from this liquidity driven<br />

rally. We recommend overweighting cyclical stocks trading at or below <strong>the</strong>ir low<br />

cycle P/Es for an eventual recovery. We prefer <strong>the</strong> developed markets of Asia<br />

(Singapore and Hong Kong) and China, which should experience a quicker<br />

recovery process due to <strong>the</strong>ir stronger fiscal balance. Potentially rising risk in<br />

Eastern Europe substantiates our underweight in emerging ASEAN countries<br />

and India against a backdrop of risk aversion. Taiwan and Korea is at Neutral as<br />

external and domestic risks are balanced.<br />

Joanne Goh • (65) 6878 5233 • joannegohsc@dbs.com<br />

Page 6<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

sa: TW<br />

"This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong> (Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited" disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

A quarter of endless downgrades<br />

Continued dismal economic data and poor equities<br />

performance in <strong>the</strong> first quarter should not be a surprise. We<br />

had expected <strong>the</strong> slew of bad economic news to continue<br />

unabated, but <strong>the</strong> outcome has again underperformed <strong>the</strong><br />

worst of expectations.<br />

What surprised us was <strong>the</strong> depth of <strong>the</strong> economic decline,<br />

which prompted <strong>DBS</strong> economics team to fur<strong>the</strong>r downgrade<br />

2009 GDP forecasts (Fig. 1). Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> downgrades are<br />

sufficient remain questionable, as some of <strong>the</strong> economic data<br />

had busted our previously forecast 'worst case' scenario. With<br />

downside risks still high in <strong>the</strong> external environment - and<br />

given <strong>the</strong> challenges that many Asian countries will face - we<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> road to recovery will be a bumpy one.<br />

Final capitulation?<br />

<strong>Equities</strong> fell again this quarter, but less than in <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

two quarters as a short rally at <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> year offset<br />

losses later in <strong>the</strong> quarter. Valuation, as measured by 12-<br />

month forward price-earnings ratio, was at its lowest point at<br />

<strong>the</strong> October capitulation. Following a 34% decline in earnings<br />

expectations, we note that current valuations are higher now<br />

than <strong>the</strong>y were in October. We hope for a final capitulation in<br />

2Q09, premised on expectations that 1Q09 will most likely be<br />

<strong>the</strong> worst quarter in terms of economic performance, and <strong>the</strong><br />

result of US banks' stress test will clear some anxiety about<br />

what US Treasury needs to do with <strong>the</strong> US banks. On <strong>the</strong><br />

valuation front, we note that <strong>the</strong> price to book value for Asia<br />

ex Japan is approaching <strong>the</strong> lows seen during <strong>the</strong> recession in<br />

1998 and 2002 (Fig. 2). A final sell down towards <strong>the</strong>se levels,<br />

could well trigger a strong market rally in Asia equities.<br />

Economic recovery should be on its way<br />

We expect fiscal and monetary stimulus policies in Asia to<br />

generate a recovery in 2H09. We are also looking for a<br />

rebound in <strong>the</strong> US and China to boost Asian economies.<br />

Asia policy makers had been hard at work, cutting benchmark<br />

rates at almost every o<strong>the</strong>r policy meeting. The lagged effects<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se rate cuts should begin to show in 2H09.<br />

Fig. 1: 2009 GDP growth estimates vs 2002 and historical low<br />

2009 forecasts as of 2002 Hist.<br />

as of Dec08 Current Ch an ge growth Low<br />

US 0.5 -0.3 -0.8 0.7 -1.9<br />

Japan -0.2 -4 .5 -4.3 0.3 -2.4<br />

Eurozone -0.3 -2.8 -2.5 0.9 -0.8<br />

Indonesia 4.8 4.3 -0.5 3.8 -13.1<br />

Malaysia 3.3 -1.2 -4.5 0.6 -7.4<br />

Singapore -0.6 -4.8 -4.2 -2.4 -2.4<br />

Thailand 1.5 -3.5 -5.0 2.2 -10.5<br />

China 8 7.5 -0.5 7.3 3.8<br />

Hong Kong -0.5 -3.5 -3.0 0.6 -5.0<br />

Taiwan 1 -3.5 -4.5 -2.2 -2.2<br />

Ko rea 1 .4 - 1 .9 - 3.3 3 .8 - 6.9<br />

In dia 6.5 4.5 -2 4.0 -5.2<br />

Source: CEIC, Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> forecasts. Historical low since 1980<br />

except Eurozone from 1992<br />

Fig. 2: Asia ex-Japan Price to book value<br />

(x)<br />

2.8<br />

2.6<br />

2.4<br />

2.2<br />

2<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream. Shaded areas are recession periods 1997/98 and<br />

2001/2<br />

Fig. 3: Change in policy rate since October<br />

Interest rate (%)<br />

Beg. Sep 08 Current Cuts<br />

US 2.0 0.25 1.75<br />

EZ 4.25 1.5 2.75<br />

Japan 0.5 0.1 0.4<br />

Aus 7.25 3.25 4.0<br />

China 7.47 5.31 2.16<br />

India 9.0 5.0 4.0<br />

Korea 5.25 2 3.25<br />

Thai 3.75 1.5 2.25<br />

Taiwan 3.625 1.25 2.38<br />

Indonesia 9.25 7.75 1.5<br />

Malaysia 3.5 2 1.5<br />

Source: Datastream, CEIC<br />

Page 7


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Asian governments have implemented stimulus packages that<br />

are expected to add 1%-8% to 2009 GDP, lifting <strong>the</strong> chance<br />

of a swift recovery, and positioning <strong>the</strong>ir economies to take<br />

advantage of opportunities when global demand recovers.<br />

Some stimulus programs are already in place and <strong>the</strong> effect of<br />

it has been felt, especially in China, while o<strong>the</strong>rs are <strong>the</strong>re to<br />

temporarily cushion against a hard landing. The major impact<br />

will mostly be felt in <strong>the</strong> second half. That said, most Asian<br />

governments are poised to inject more stimulus support should<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir economies deteriorate fur<strong>the</strong>r. Malaysia recently added a<br />

second stimulus package equivalent to 9% of GDP. Finally,<br />

Asian currencies have depreciated significantly, especially <strong>the</strong><br />

Korean won, and this should soon lift export competitiveness.<br />

Fig 4: Asia countries’ stimulus package size and highlights<br />

Country Size Highlights<br />

China<br />

Singapore<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Y4tril, or 16% of<br />

GDP over<br />

2009/2010<br />

S$20.5bln and<br />

largest ever 3.5%<br />

deficit<br />

2 triillion on large-scale infrastructure projects such as railways, roads, airports and <strong>the</strong> national grid,<br />

rebuild areas ravaged by May's Sichuan earthquake. The rest of <strong>the</strong> stimulus money will be spent on an<br />

affordable housing, rural welfare and infrastructure construction, medical and cultural development,<br />

environmental protection as well as industrial restructuring.<br />

Jobs Credit to help preserve jobs ; Special Risk-sharing Initiative (SRI) to stimulate bank lending; A wide<br />

array of tax rebates, exemptions and grants for businesses to enhance business cash-flows and<br />

competitiveness; support for households and Increase public sector construction spending to between SGD<br />

18-20bn in 2009.<br />

Budget deficit of Emphasise directions for developments and prospects on regional corperation, tourism and new economic<br />

2.4% GDP, widened developments. Include: foster HK/Guangdong/Macao cooperation, three direct links" and exchanges with<br />

from 0.3% last year Taiwan, expand coverage of Individual Visit Scheme, more progress under <strong>the</strong> "Shenzhen-Hong Kong<br />

Innovation Circle", push ahead with public works projects, tax breaks and rental reduction.<br />

Malaysia<br />

Thailand<br />

1st: MYR7bln or<br />

1.1% of GDP;<br />

2nd: MYR60bln or<br />

9% of GDP over<br />

2009/10<br />

Bt116bn or 2% of<br />

GDP<br />

Reducing unemployment and increasing employment opportunities of about 63K jobs, easing <strong>the</strong> burden<br />

of <strong>the</strong> rakyat, in particular vulnerable groups, assisting <strong>the</strong> private sector in facing <strong>the</strong> crisis with incentives<br />

on <strong>the</strong> property, airlines, auto, plantations sector, and increased investments by Khazanah; infrastructure<br />

spending.<br />

Extended <strong>the</strong> economic relief package by ano<strong>the</strong>r 6 months which includes free tap water and free public<br />

transport; maintain village funding, replace <strong>the</strong> Small, Medium and Large enterprise (SML) fund with <strong>the</strong><br />

economic sufficiency fund. Govenment purchase schemes for farmers to cope with falling commodity<br />

prices. Medium term joint investment program for infrastructure projects to be announced.<br />

Indonesia IDR 71.3trn or 1.4%<br />

of GDP<br />

Korea KRW 14trn or 1.5%<br />

of GDP<br />

Tax changes for individuals and corporates including 2%-pt cut in corporate tax; Waived taxes and import<br />

duties for busineses and certain households; Subsidies and government spending for businesses<br />

Proposed a wide range of tax cuts including corporate tax and income tax, totaling KRW 20.7trn over five<br />

years (2.2% of GDP); Spent KRW 8trn (0.8% of GDP) to help <strong>the</strong> construction industry, such as buying<br />

construction firms’ unused land and unsold new homes.<br />

Taiwan 2% of GDP A TWD 181bn fiscal stimulus program (1.3% of GDP), including public construction, tax breaks to private<br />

investment, subsidies to low-income households and preferential housing loans; distributed consumer<br />

shopping vouchers (TWD 83.5bn, 0.6% of GDP); 3) Increased budget for infrastructure investment over<br />

<strong>the</strong> next four years (a total of TWD 420bn)<br />

India 5% GDP or 6%<br />

fiscal deficit, more<br />

Defense spending, subsidy on items like food, fertilizers and petroleum, interest subsidy of two per cent on<br />

pre-shipment and post shipment credit for employment-oriented sectors; tax rebates for SMES; increased<br />

than twice budgeted approval on PPP infrastructure projects<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>, Official government websites<br />

Page 8


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

… but risks of a delay remain<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> economics team is looking for moderation in <strong>the</strong> pace of<br />

decline from this quarter to set <strong>the</strong> stage for recovery in <strong>the</strong><br />

second half. While maintaining this baseline view, we<br />

recognize that risks of a delay remain high. The global business<br />

sector adjustment has been so intense that household<br />

structural fundamentals on spending and savings patterns may<br />

be impacted as income, home and equity prices decline. In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong> global financial system is fragile; credit availability<br />

is influenced by perceptions of growth and potential<br />

delinquencies as unemployment and bankruptcies rise.<br />

In Asia, <strong>the</strong> contours of recent economic performance are<br />

giving us mixed signals - a worse than expected collapse in<br />

exports and manufacturing activities in 4Q08 is extending into<br />

January, where weakness could have been distorted by <strong>the</strong> loss<br />

of several working days during <strong>the</strong> lunar new year holidays.<br />

Korea's February exports are higher than January's, but yearon-year<br />

change continues to slide. Meanwhile, China's PMI<br />

survey has continued to dip below 50 but has shown signs of<br />

improvement, and new yuan lending in <strong>the</strong> first two months is<br />

almost half <strong>the</strong> total new lending in 2008, leading to<br />

suspicions about where <strong>the</strong> funds had been channelled to and<br />

might prompt PBOC to halt fur<strong>the</strong>r monetary easing.<br />

Additionally, still high inventory levels across <strong>the</strong> region<br />

indicate inventory is not drawing down fast enough because<br />

global demand is deteriorating at a faster pace. It is against<br />

this backdrop that we will stress test our views with upcoming<br />

data releases.<br />

Our faith in Asia's financial system keeps us believing that<br />

credit availability will resume once we see some stability in <strong>the</strong><br />

economic data, and that should be <strong>the</strong> last set of drivers<br />

needed for sustained recovery. Investors need to recognize<br />

that banks cannot "avoid lending" forever, as <strong>the</strong>ir main<br />

business is to give loans and earn a spread. Central banks have<br />

urged or encouraged banks to lend, through varying stimulus<br />

programs like risk sharing, providing low cost capital and<br />

taking over banks' bad assets to improve banks' capital base.<br />

At some point, when banks start feeling confident about <strong>the</strong><br />

economy and investors start feeling that investment returns are<br />

higher than borrowing rates, <strong>the</strong> incentive to borrow and lend<br />

will commence ano<strong>the</strong>r economic cycle. While <strong>the</strong> still fragile<br />

risk environment will no doubt cause banks to adopt a<br />

cautious stance towards lending, <strong>the</strong>re is anecdotal evidence<br />

that <strong>the</strong> government risk-sharing scheme has had a positive<br />

impact on bank lending.<br />

Against this backdrop, markets will trade within a wide range<br />

As long as <strong>the</strong> headwinds remain strong, consensus<br />

expectations are likely to remain skewed towards a deeper and<br />

more protracted recession. On <strong>the</strong> flip side, low valuations,<br />

positive news on policy response, and government<br />

interventions are providing a measure of resilience to Asian<br />

markets against a weak global equities backdrop. On a relative<br />

basis, Asia's sound economic fundamentals and stronger<br />

corporate balance sheets will need to withstand <strong>the</strong> wave of<br />

potential corporate and sovereign bankruptcies in o<strong>the</strong>r parts<br />

of <strong>the</strong> world (including major developed countries, and in<br />

Eastern Europe and Latin America.) If it is able to come<br />

through <strong>the</strong>se windstorms relatively unsca<strong>the</strong>d, Asian markets<br />

will emerge as a more attractive investment destination on <strong>the</strong><br />

path to recovery.<br />

Moreover <strong>the</strong> heavy hedge fund selling in October may not<br />

repeat itself, as that was in part possibly due to <strong>the</strong> closing out<br />

of positions by Lehman and fear of <strong>the</strong> redemptions leading to<br />

a negative asset price spiral.<br />

All said, Asia markets could continue to move sideways within<br />

a big range, pending a final capitulation move.<br />

US bailout plan <strong>the</strong> wild card – <strong>the</strong> devil’s in <strong>the</strong> details<br />

Whilst <strong>the</strong> US Treasury PPIP is a step in <strong>the</strong> right direction, <strong>the</strong><br />

ability of its efficacy to unfreeze credit remains in question.<br />

Most importantly <strong>the</strong> pricing at which <strong>the</strong>re will be willing<br />

sellers have yet to be determined. So far a couple of potential<br />

buyers have expressed interest in indicative pricing of 50-60cts<br />

to a dollar but no “interested sellers” have emerged. The<br />

actual pricing could bring more potential write-offs and fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

capital raising may be needed by <strong>the</strong> sellers of <strong>the</strong>se bad<br />

assets. Buyers of <strong>the</strong>se bad assets could potentially be stuck<br />

with <strong>the</strong>m for some time if <strong>the</strong> economy does not recover as<br />

expected. Uncertainty and <strong>the</strong> impact of which will still remain<br />

until <strong>the</strong> very first auction takes place in few weeks time. As of<br />

now <strong>the</strong> time table is still not known but reports cited May 1<br />

as <strong>the</strong> target date set by <strong>the</strong> US Treasury. Till <strong>the</strong>n we believe<br />

positive news on <strong>the</strong> PPIP, in part due to US Treasury<br />

marketing efforts, and a suppressed risk appetite, could sustain<br />

<strong>the</strong> current “PPIP” rally for some time. We believe <strong>the</strong> US<br />

market will be <strong>the</strong> main driver for Asian equities in <strong>the</strong> second<br />

quarter. We look at price to book valuations to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

trading range for <strong>the</strong> quarter. Broadly, <strong>the</strong> markets seem to be<br />

finding support at -2SD away from mean (See appendix) as in<br />

<strong>the</strong> last quarter.<br />

Page 9


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

On a technical note, 2Q08 proved to be <strong>the</strong> best performing<br />

quarter for <strong>the</strong> year. This followed <strong>the</strong> fire-sale of Bear Stearns<br />

to JPMorgan at end March 08. Short-term investors may be<br />

drawn in by <strong>the</strong> current positive momentum, thus attracting<br />

more flows and reinforcing <strong>the</strong> positive feedback loop into <strong>the</strong><br />

current rally.<br />

Our only concern is <strong>the</strong> equities market rising too much too<br />

fast, implying that volatility and risks are still high amid a still<br />

weak economic backdrop to attract serious long term investors<br />

for a sustainable rally beyond <strong>the</strong> current euphoria. Our<br />

recommendations to buy into cyclicals with low cycle P/E<br />

where long term growth forecasts have been shaved remains<br />

intact.<br />

Fig 5: MSCI Asia ex-Japan and S&P500 – 2008 quarterly<br />

performance<br />

%<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

appreciating course, we could easily see <strong>the</strong> outflow of<br />

abundant USD liquidity into o<strong>the</strong>r countries and o<strong>the</strong>r asset<br />

classes. This is however not our currency view for <strong>the</strong> first half<br />

of 2009.<br />

Fig 6: MSCI Asia ex-Japan, 50D and 100D moving averages<br />

Index<br />

750<br />

700<br />

650<br />

600<br />

550<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

J an-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 J an-09<br />

MSCI AXJ 50D MAV 100D MAV<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

12<br />

Fig 7: US M2 growth and Fed Funds rates<br />

%<br />

-20<br />

AXJ<br />

S&P500<br />

10<br />

-25<br />

Q1 2008 Q2 2008 Q3 2008 Q4 2008<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Liquidity – ano<strong>the</strong>r wild card<br />

At <strong>the</strong> conclusion of its two-day FOMC meeting on March 18<br />

<strong>the</strong> Fed announced plans to purchase ano<strong>the</strong>r $1.15trn of<br />

assets, to fur<strong>the</strong>r liquefy <strong>the</strong> financial system and promote<br />

lending / economic growth. The plan is to purchase $300bn of<br />

long-dated Treasuries over <strong>the</strong> next six months. By so doing it<br />

is lowering long term interest rates and expanding <strong>the</strong><br />

monetary base. While we have doubts if <strong>the</strong> money will work<br />

its way into <strong>the</strong> credit system to promote lending, <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

remains that expansionary monetary policy at <strong>the</strong> bottom of a<br />

cycle is like pushing on a string, as our chief economist termed<br />

it. At <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>the</strong> greenback was dumped as it<br />

reinforced <strong>the</strong> fear that Fed’s action would flood <strong>the</strong> market<br />

with USDs. Recently, China has proposed to reform <strong>the</strong><br />

international financial system by using <strong>the</strong> IMF SDR currency,<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r shaking <strong>the</strong> confidence of USD as a reserve currency<br />

and its current safe haven status. If <strong>the</strong> USD reverses its<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Page 10


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

VIX and hence risks aversion still high, but acceptable<br />

Fig 8: VIX and standard deviation bands<br />

(index)<br />

85<br />

75<br />

65<br />

55<br />

lowest. Being defensive in nature, <strong>the</strong>re is little upside to<br />

growth prospects and P/E multiples are high. The debate on<br />

defensive vs cyclicals, and external vs domestic demand on<br />

some sectors like <strong>the</strong> Singapore Telcos will provide good entry<br />

points through <strong>the</strong> cycle.<br />

Fig 9: Asia ex-Japan Long-term earnings growth forecasts and<br />

P/E Levels<br />

(%) (x)<br />

28<br />

25<br />

45<br />

35<br />

25<br />

15<br />

5<br />

93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

22<br />

16<br />

10<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Source: Datastream. Shaded areas are recession periods in 1997/98<br />

and 2001/2<br />

VIX levels have once again risen above 50, way above <strong>the</strong> two<br />

standard deviation range, suggesting <strong>the</strong> extreme re-testing of<br />

nerves in <strong>the</strong> markets, but has now returned to <strong>the</strong> 40 levels.<br />

Typically, <strong>the</strong> volatility index during recession episodes has<br />

ranged between 17 and 42. We deemed levels within this<br />

range acceptable under current economic backdrop.<br />

Long term growth at historical low, but not P/E levels<br />

Growth expectations have been reduced in anticipation of a<br />

deteriorating economy. We attempt to look for cyclical sectors<br />

trading at low cycle P/E that will benefit from a cyclical upturn.<br />

In our stress test, we attempted to find sectors that are already<br />

trading at low P/Es, combined with long-term growth forecasts<br />

which had been downgraded by analysts to <strong>the</strong>ir historical<br />

lows. The absence of such sectors supports our conclusion that<br />

<strong>the</strong> final capitulation is not yet here. The sectors to watch for,<br />

however, are <strong>the</strong> cyclical sectors in which long-term growth<br />

expectations had been shaved to historic lows, but P/E levels<br />

have not yet adjusted to reflect <strong>the</strong> lowered growth<br />

expectations. These include <strong>the</strong> external cyclicals of Korean IT,<br />

Taiwan IT, and Indian IT; domestic cyclicals of Singapore<br />

Telcos, Korean Telcos, Malaysian Financials, and Taiwan<br />

Financials, Taiwan Consumer Discretionary and Indian<br />

Consumer Discretionary. Stimulus measures to boost<br />

household demand through preventing job loss, tax cuts and<br />

increased social spending should help demand with a smaller<br />

time lag vs <strong>the</strong> external cyclicals. We will be cautious of<br />

domestic defensives like Thai Utilities, Thai Energy, and<br />

Malaysia Staples, where growth had been downgraded to <strong>the</strong><br />

4<br />

0<br />

93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Growth (L)<br />

Source: Datastream. Shaded areas are recession periods in 1997/98<br />

and 2001/2<br />

High correlation between countries and sectors<br />

P/E (R)<br />

The correlation between countries and sectors has risen to an<br />

all time high, which implies that value-add from country and<br />

sector selection has diminished significantly. There are several<br />

reasons for this: (i) forced selling in <strong>the</strong> past, suspected due to<br />

heavy fund redemptions, have led to <strong>the</strong> indiscriminate selling<br />

of equities regardless of valuations and fundamentals; (ii) <strong>the</strong><br />

selling has resulted in valuations being generally inexpensive<br />

across sectors and countries, and yet failing to provide support<br />

compounds investor confidence, thus reducing <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

diversification based on value; (iii) <strong>the</strong> synchronization of global<br />

economic cycles, particularly <strong>the</strong> spike in global commodity<br />

prices driving herd mentality last year and <strong>the</strong> current global<br />

recession driving flight to quality; (iv) economic sensitivity on<br />

sector earnings of domestic vs external, defensives vs cyclicals<br />

is not as clear cut anymore as a result of <strong>the</strong> global<br />

synchronization (v) a turn of events with <strong>the</strong> US bail out plan<br />

will raise/ reduce risk appetite across <strong>the</strong> whole equities asset<br />

class premised on a change in <strong>the</strong> perception of financial risk.<br />

Page 11


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 10: Average correlation between Asia ex-Japan countries<br />

(r)<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Fig. 11: Average correlation between Asia ex-Japan sectors<br />

(r)<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> risk of forced selling by hedge fund<br />

redemptions are lower now than before. One, <strong>the</strong> capitulation<br />

we saw was partly driven by closing out of positions by<br />

Lehman and o<strong>the</strong>r financial institutions. Secondly, that<br />

capitulation has driven valuations to historic lows and has<br />

precipitated a bear market rally of around 29% (MSCI Asia ex-<br />

Japan), with some share prices almost doubling during <strong>the</strong><br />

rally. Markets tend to have good hindsight, and if it does<br />

happen again, long-term investors will be likely be more ready<br />

to accumulate into <strong>the</strong> weakness. Thirdly, long-term investors,<br />

including sovereign funds and pension funds, remain<br />

formidable participants in today's market. US mutual funds,<br />

which we use as a proxy for pension funds, have seen net sales<br />

in December and January. National pension funds in Korea<br />

and national stabilization funds in Taiwan are purportedly<br />

intervening in market operations selectively. Our view is that<br />

<strong>the</strong> de-risking in Asian equities is more or less over.<br />

Fig. 12: US mutual fund emerging markets category - Monthly<br />

net sales<br />

US$bil<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

x<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

0.3<br />

92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

-3<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream, Investment Company Institute<br />

Page 12


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Ideas from global price assumptions<br />

Major commodity prices are trading in line with <strong>the</strong> weak<br />

economic outlook, with a slight downward bias. However,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> bottoming out in November last year, we saw some<br />

technical payback and hopes for a second half economic<br />

recovery is limiting fur<strong>the</strong>r downside to prices. That said, this<br />

year's average will be significantly lower than last year's, and<br />

we expect analysts (both in <strong>DBS</strong> and on <strong>the</strong> street) to<br />

downgrade earnings forecasts on <strong>the</strong>se global assumptions.<br />

The negative earnings sensitivity following a drop in contract<br />

prices and sale volume should outweigh <strong>the</strong> benefits of<br />

softening raw material prices as an input cost due to <strong>the</strong> time<br />

lag in inventory adjustment.<br />

There is still no sight of a demand driver, but price volatility<br />

due to supply cuts and contract price negotiations in April<br />

may provide some trading opportunity.<br />

Recent supply concerns and belief that China stimulus plans<br />

will create demand have driven up CPO prices. <strong>DBS</strong>V analyst<br />

Ben Santoso believes that this could be temporary and prices<br />

could pull back by April. CPO price should be higher by <strong>the</strong><br />

end of <strong>the</strong> year due to supply constraints as a result of lower<br />

soybean output, drought and La Nina, and flat yields. Ben<br />

believes <strong>the</strong> plantation sector is already trading at low cycle<br />

PE, but <strong>the</strong>re could be a better buying opportunity when<br />

prices pull back in April. We have recently revised up our<br />

2009 average CPO price assumption by 25% to<br />

RM1900/MT.<br />

On refinery margins, <strong>DBS</strong>V analyst Vichitr Kuladejkhuna<br />

believes that <strong>the</strong> short-term rally in refinery margins should<br />

have ended. Temporary refining capacity cutback and<br />

recovered gasoline demand had driven gasoline crack spread<br />

to exceptionally strong levels (peaked at US$20), while<br />

middle distillate (jet fuel and diesel) crack spread fell to<br />

alarming levels (below US$10), due to <strong>the</strong> weak economy.<br />

These led Singapore refining margins to peak at US$10 in<br />

mid-Feb, but it recently fell back to US$4-$5 as gasoline<br />

crack spread weakened to US$10 and middle distillate<br />

remained weak. Looking forward, <strong>the</strong> global recession will<br />

be a major threat to oil demand, which looks all <strong>the</strong><br />

ominous given that <strong>the</strong>re will be new refining capacity<br />

coming on-line. We remain cautious on <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

Fig. 13: CRB spot index<br />

Index<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

Mar-08 May-08 J ul-08 Sep-08 Nov-08 J an-09<br />

Source: Datastream, Commodities Bureau <strong>Research</strong><br />

For China spot coal price, <strong>DBS</strong>V analyst Helen Wang sees a<br />

near-term downtrend in 2Q09 to reflect <strong>the</strong> traditionally low<br />

season for coal consumption because of warmer wea<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Meanwhile, looking at fundamentals, coal inventory at<br />

Qinghuangdao port – <strong>the</strong> biggest port in nor<strong>the</strong>rn China for<br />

coal transport – had picked up recently on slowing demand<br />

from downstream end-users, particularly coal-fired utilities.<br />

Growth in <strong>the</strong> power generation industry hinges on recovery in<br />

<strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector in China. China's contract <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

coal for 2009 is still under negotiation between coal suppliers<br />

and IPPs. The results will be out next month at <strong>the</strong> earliest, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is still a big divergence on price outlook between <strong>the</strong><br />

parties. We are maintaining our assumption of a 10% YoY rise<br />

in 2009 <strong>the</strong>rmal coal contract price, but we might see 2-5ppt<br />

downward revision if near term demand does not improve<br />

significantly in China. Likewise for Indonesian coal, contract<br />

negotiations for un-priced 2009 deliveries are getting tougher.<br />

Some customers might scale back coal consumption in light of<br />

<strong>the</strong> recent economic downturn, whereas cost will not drop<br />

much because a large portion of cost comprises of mining<br />

contractor fees, which is contracted for several years.<br />

On Korean steel prices, <strong>DBS</strong>V analyst EunYoung Lee believes<br />

raw material price negotiations in April with miners will include<br />

cutting delivery of contracted volumes. That should mark <strong>the</strong><br />

end of <strong>the</strong> negative news flow for <strong>the</strong> sector, which could<br />

imply an inflection point for POSCO.<br />

Page 13


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

In line with <strong>the</strong> collapse in world trade, we expect <strong>the</strong> Baltic<br />

Dry Index (BDI) to stay weak. <strong>DBS</strong>V analyst Wee Lee Chong<br />

pointed out that freight rates are now vulnerable to downside<br />

risks. The BDI recently surged to 2,099, significantly higher<br />

than our projected average of 1,109 for 2009. We also observe<br />

that <strong>the</strong> traditional high correlation of >0.9 between <strong>the</strong> BDI<br />

and share prices of regional dry bulk shipping companies has<br />

been reinstated since early February. Hence, we expect <strong>the</strong><br />

anticipated BDI retreat to exert downward pressure on share<br />

prices of those companies (see Dry Bulk Shipping report,<br />

"Mayday, Mayday", Wee Lee Chong et. al., 24 Feb 2009)<br />

Fig. 14: BDI and World trade<br />

%<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-50<br />

-100<br />

-150<br />

-30<br />

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

BDI (yoy%, L)<br />

World exports (R,%yoy)<br />

Source: Datastream, IFS<br />

Fig. 15: Global prices and 2009 assumptions<br />

Refinery<br />

margin<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

Current<br />

2009 Avg<br />

price YTD% Assumption<br />

US$/barrel 1.81 -63.7 4<br />

Coal US$/MT 63.0 -20.3 90<br />

BDI Index 2271 193.8 1109<br />

CPO M$/MT 2051 19.1 1900<br />

Copper US$/MT 3589 11.1 3400<br />

Nickel US$/MT 9800 -25.8 15000<br />

Aluminim US$/MT 1339 -14.7 1800<br />

Tin US$/MT 10750 -7.5 12500<br />

Steel US$/MT 495 -5.7 630<br />

Rising risk from Eastern Europe<br />

We assess <strong>the</strong> risks to Asia from a potential meltdown in East<br />

Europe from three main points:-<br />

The direct impact of slower Asian exports to Eastern Europe<br />

is minimal, because <strong>the</strong> region only accounts for minimal<br />

c.3% of Asia's exports. Korea and China has <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

export exposure to Eastern Europe among Asian countries, at<br />

5-6% of total exports. This also means that with <strong>the</strong> exports<br />

to <strong>the</strong> G3 majors already falling sharply, <strong>the</strong> additional<br />

impact of falling demand from <strong>the</strong> Eastern European region<br />

won't be great, but export recovery in <strong>the</strong> second half<br />

sounds optimistic amid rising new risks.<br />

The first derivative impact should be from heightened risk<br />

aversion, as sovereign risk is again being scrutinized.<br />

Countries with high external debt and negative current<br />

account balance, such as Korea, India and Indonesia, fell into<br />

<strong>the</strong> limelight again. This becomes more salient when robust<br />

fiscal spending is required to cushion <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> crisis.<br />

Countries with high budget deficits are subject to ratings<br />

downgrades, and possibly raising costs of external<br />

borrowings. Standard & Poors downgraded India's ratings<br />

outlook last month, and if its budget deficit balloons fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

it risks being downgraded to junk bond status.<br />

Fig. 16: Regional countries: Share of exports to Eastern Europe (%)<br />

1990 1995 2000 2006 2007 2008<br />

Hong Kong 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.3<br />

Korea 0.5 2.7 2.1 5.8 7.0 5.6<br />

Taiwan NA NA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Philippines 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9<br />

Singapore 1.5 1.1 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.7<br />

Thailand 1.3 2.1 0.9 1.8 2.3 2.2<br />

India 18.3 4.8 3.8 3.3 3.8 3.1<br />

Indonesia 0.7 1.3 0.8 1.4 2.0 1.8<br />

Malaysia 1.3 0.7 0.6 1.5 1.9 1.6<br />

Asia ex Ch, Jp 1.9 1.5 0.9 2.0 2.5 2.2<br />

Japan 1.6 0.7 0.8 2.6 3.3 3.1<br />

US 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.9 2.3 2.5<br />

Europe 5.0 6.8 7.7 12.0 13.2 11.8<br />

China 5.6 2.5 2.9 5.8 6.9 6.1<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>. Current as of Mar 11.<br />

Page 14


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 17: Asian countries' current account and budget deficit<br />

As % of GDP<br />

C/A Balance<br />

Fiscal Balance<br />

2008 2009F 2007 2008 2009F<br />

Indonesia 0.4 0.2 -1.1 -1.2 -2.9<br />

Malaysia 11.4 7.8 -3.2 -5.1 -6.6<br />

Philippines 2.3 2.9 -0.2 -0.8 -2.6<br />

Singapore 13.5 14 3.4 0.8 -4.1<br />

Thailand -0.1 -0.2 -2.4 -0.6 -4.2<br />

China 10.2 6.1 0.6 -0.1 -3.6<br />

Hong Kong 9.2 9.5 7.7 -2.1 -3.7<br />

Taiwan 4.1 7.9 0.1 -1.7 -5.0<br />

Korea -0.7 1.2 3.8 0.3 -3.5<br />

India -3.6 -3.9 -2.8 -6 -6.1<br />

Source: Datastream, EIU<br />

Fig. 18: Asia countries external debt positions, 2009F<br />

Foreign Foreign Debt Total Reserves<br />

reserves Public Private ST / ST debt<br />

Sector Sector Debt (x)<br />

Indonesia 31 79.9 33.2 21.4 1.4<br />

Malaysia 93 22.5 15.5 8.1 11.4<br />

Philippines 24 41.1 16.3 4.4 5.5<br />

Singapore 181 1.1 11.3 6.8 26.5<br />

Thailand 99 11.9 23.4 17.3 5.7<br />

China 1850 88.1 64.7 171.9 10.8<br />

HK 132 2.2 41.9 27.2 4.8<br />

Taiwan 266 0.4 12.8 55.2 4.8<br />

Korea 151 51.5 63.0 65.4 2.3<br />

India 230 96.9 49.5 25.1 9.2<br />

Source: Datastream, EIU<br />

The second derivative impact is exposure to <strong>the</strong> meltdown of<br />

Eastern Europe. Western banks, especially Europeans banks,<br />

have purportedly been funding Eastern Europe's past<br />

development. Its collapse will worsen <strong>the</strong> credit crisis<br />

especially for European banks, and in turn GCC, which also<br />

gets a lot of funding from European banks. In Asia, funding<br />

to countries with high external debt like Korea and Indonesia<br />

will be affected by a fur<strong>the</strong>r credit squeeze. Credit default<br />

swaps for sovereigns are mostly higher now than in October<br />

2008 (see Fig. 19).<br />

Fig. 19: Credit default swap spreads for Sovereigns<br />

Sovereign<br />

Oct<br />

2008<br />

Beg<br />

2009 Latest Sovereign<br />

Oct<br />

2008<br />

Beg<br />

2009 Latest<br />

ECUADOR 2217 NA NA MALAYSIA 235 225 322<br />

INDIA 206 NA NA NEW YORK/STATE OF 70 279 320<br />

UKRAINE 2253 3093 4626 THAILAND 235 242 318<br />

PAKISTAN 2522 3084 3084 NEVADA STATE OF 72 290 317<br />

VENEZUELA 2100 3229 2441 NEW JERSEY 152 307 312<br />

ICELAND 921 983 1097 CZECH REPUBLIC 153 170 300<br />

LITHUANIA 450 596 847 CHILE 225 203 275<br />

RUSSIAN FEDERATION 633 748 772 ISRAEL 183 162 273<br />

DUBAI/EMIRATE OF 470 470 723 GREECE 135 240 265<br />

INDONESIA 707 633 705 CHINA 163 186 247<br />

BULGARIA 417 499 698 NEW ZEALAND 23 23 236<br />

EGYPT SEN 700 598 688 FLORIDA 129 215 235<br />

HUNGARY 315 419 638 SLOVENIA (REP.OF) 101 112 205<br />

BAHRAIN (KINGDOM OF) 338 442 618 ITALY 117 171 199<br />

EL SALVADOR 263 263 524 SLOVAKIA 150 155 195<br />

TURKEY 475 410 520 TEMASEK HLDGS 124 135 170<br />

COLOMBIA 325 308 495 UNITED KINGDOM 59 112 158<br />

PHILIPPINES 468 386 475 HONG KONG 109 104 150<br />

KOREA 370 311 458 SWEDEN 67 123 150<br />

BRAZIL 319 300 412 SPAIN 83 106 149<br />

ABU DHABI CITY OF 193 230 401 BELGIUM KINGDOM 56 80 148<br />

POLAND 178 247 371 VIRGINIA 55 55 146<br />

CALIFORNIA 143 357 339 DENMARK 66 122 142<br />

TUNISIA 245 256 336 JAPAN 40 45 110<br />

QATAR 189 219 335 FRANCE 42 55 96<br />

MOROCCO 350 288 330 FINLAND 38 59 89<br />

NEW YORK/CITY OF 178 283 325 NORWAY (KINGDOM OF) 27 38 62<br />

Source: Datastream. Highlighted countries belong to Asia<br />

Page 15


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 20: Japan's current account balance<br />

US$bln<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

-500<br />

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

The third derivative impact is from <strong>the</strong> exports collapse as a<br />

result of fur<strong>the</strong>r weaker growth and credit squeeze, which will<br />

widen current account deficits. This could cause <strong>the</strong> USD to<br />

appreciate fur<strong>the</strong>r as a narrower trade balance means less<br />

foreign currency earned. For <strong>the</strong> first time in 13 years, Japan<br />

has chalked up a current account deficit, reflecting <strong>the</strong> dire<br />

impact of plunging global demand. We expect fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

weakness in Asia currencies.<br />

Market recommendations<br />

We focus on higher beta markets of Singapore, Hong Kong<br />

and China to benefit from this liquidity rally. Fundamentally<br />

<strong>the</strong>se markets should experience a quicker recovery process<br />

due to <strong>the</strong>ir stronger fiscal muscle. The India market generally<br />

has high correlation to money supply growth, but we have we<br />

have concerns on its weak fiscal position. Taiwan is raised to<br />

Neutral as a lot of its cyclical sectors has emerged favorably<br />

from our screening of lower P/E cyclical sectors where growth<br />

has been cut aggressively.<br />

Singapore - worst case estimates built-in, waiting for<br />

capitulation<br />

We are Overweight Singapore going into 2Q.<br />

Underperformance over <strong>the</strong> past quarter was precipitated by<br />

<strong>the</strong> unexpected sharp collapse in exports. Since <strong>the</strong>n, we<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> worst foreseeable case has been priced in. <strong>DBS</strong><br />

economist has downgraded Singapore's GDP growth from -<br />

0.6% to -4.8%, which is substantially below <strong>the</strong> worst growth<br />

of -2.2% recorded in 2002. Consensus earnings growth<br />

expectations have also been slashed to -16%, in line with our<br />

expectations of -16.9% for 2009 and -10% for 2010. <strong>DBS</strong>V<br />

Singapore research team believes we are about 80% through<br />

in terms of earnings reductions. 2009 earnings growth will be -<br />

30% based on our coverage universe, if we include fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

impairment charges from property companies this year. As it is,<br />

<strong>the</strong> worst expectations have been built into stock prices -<br />

99,000 jobs lost, unemployment rate rising to 5%, 20-50%<br />

drop in property prices, banks' NPLs rose to 2.6%, and 15%<br />

cancellation rate for shipping contract orders. The wild card<br />

remains <strong>the</strong> external environment because of its high exports<br />

dependence, but to us, <strong>the</strong>re is no difference between a -5%<br />

or -10% GDP growth this year. A weaker showing this year<br />

would mean a stronger recovery next year. What is important<br />

is that corporate balance sheets are strong enough to ride<br />

through <strong>the</strong> crisis. Risk of relative US market derating could<br />

also have a strong impact on Singapore due to its higher<br />

liquidity. Our expectation for a final capitulation in 2Q09<br />

suggests outperformance for this market where valuations and<br />

growth forecasts already reflect low expectations.<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> upcoming events in Singapore to keep<br />

Singapore bustling. These include <strong>the</strong> second F1 night race in<br />

Singapore in September, after <strong>the</strong> first one last year received<br />

rave reviews. The Singapore government has also waived hotel<br />

occupancy and consumption levy for <strong>the</strong> fifth night in a bid to<br />

help <strong>the</strong> hotel industry and attract more tourists. The Marina<br />

Sands Integrated Resorts is on schedule for completion by <strong>the</strong><br />

end of <strong>the</strong> year, if not in time for <strong>the</strong> F1 race, and is<br />

accelerating <strong>the</strong> recruitment drive to hire 10,000 workers. The<br />

government is also assisting with training programs to equip<br />

<strong>the</strong> jobless with relevant skills - an effort that is greatly<br />

emphasized by <strong>the</strong> Singapore government in an effort to create<br />

jobs and prevent job loss. Some of <strong>the</strong> measures include<br />

subsidising training programs for companies to keep and retrain<br />

workers for opportunities down <strong>the</strong> road instead of dismissing<br />

workers during this downturn, as well as giving cash credit for<br />

companies to keep workers.<br />

Page 16


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 21: Singapore property sector price to book<br />

(x)<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

A big overhang in Singapore would be <strong>the</strong> oversupply in <strong>the</strong><br />

office sector in <strong>the</strong> next few years, even if we see <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

recovering from a recession. We are decidedly short in <strong>the</strong><br />

office sector. The uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> external environment,<br />

(whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> worse will be over by first half this year,) is also<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r potential risk for ano<strong>the</strong>r down leg in property prices,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> subsequent knock-on impact on banks. If this happens,<br />

it may put a lid on Singapore's outperformance. Our analysts<br />

have a forecasts drop of 20-50% currently (for mass to high<br />

end residential from <strong>the</strong> peak for physical property prices in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir earnings models, which we believe <strong>the</strong> markets had that<br />

priced in.<br />

Fig. 22: Singapore 12-month forward PER and forward growth<br />

(%) (X)<br />

28<br />

22<br />

16<br />

10<br />

4<br />

Growth (L)<br />

Source: Datastream, IBES<br />

PE (R)<br />

5<br />

93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

25<br />

23<br />

21<br />

19<br />

17<br />

15<br />

13<br />

11<br />

9<br />

7<br />

Hong Kong - private consumption revival hinges on China's<br />

stimulus<br />

Hong Kong's private consumption took a dive in recent<br />

quarters following <strong>the</strong> steep fall in property prices and stock<br />

markets, which evaporated <strong>the</strong> wealth effect that had been<br />

driving high consumption and GDP growth in <strong>the</strong> past<br />

(consumption is 61% of GDP). While <strong>the</strong> revival remains to be<br />

seen amid uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> stock market, tourist spending and<br />

arrivals from China remain a key factor preventing a total<br />

collapse of consumption in Hong Kong. We expect China to<br />

relax <strong>the</strong> quota for visitors from mainland China to visit Hong<br />

Kong in an effort to help maintain economic growth.<br />

Fig 23: Hong Kong consumption vs Hang Seng Index, yoy%<br />

(%) (%)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

PCE (L)<br />

-10<br />

88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

HSI (R)<br />

Fig 24: Hong Kong retail sales vs China tourist arrival<br />

240<br />

190<br />

140<br />

90<br />

40<br />

-10<br />

-60<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

-60<br />

% %<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Tourist arrivals from China (L)<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Retail sales value (R)<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Page 17


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

China – government still targeting 8% GDP growth<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> cumulative impact of <strong>the</strong> sizeable fiscal stimulus<br />

and aggressive monetary loosening to be more prominent in<br />

<strong>the</strong> second half of this year, and take 3Q09/4Q09 headline GDP<br />

growth back to 8% YoY. For full year 2009, we are looking at<br />

7.5% YoY GDP growth.<br />

our analyst is concerned about deteriorating asset quality and<br />

rising NPLs.<br />

Fig. 25: China M2 and credit growth, %yoy<br />

%<br />

27<br />

The external environment remains <strong>the</strong> biggest risk, in our view.<br />

However, what sets China apart from o<strong>the</strong>r countries despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> deteriorating trade performance is its strong fiscal muscle<br />

and abundant liquidity. Looking beyond <strong>the</strong> numerical<br />

significance of China targeting 8% growth, <strong>the</strong> more important<br />

implication is <strong>the</strong> message that <strong>the</strong> central government will do<br />

all it can to prevent a sharp downturn.<br />

Headline GDP will fall by 0.5% for every 10% drop in exports,<br />

assuming all o<strong>the</strong>r contributions are constant. The external<br />

environment is uncontrollable, but China can, by virtue of its<br />

strong reserves, lift domestic consumption and investment to<br />

offset slowing exports. The two sectors where fiscal spending<br />

will be concentrated are fixed asset investment, in particular<br />

infrastructure spending, as well as to lift private consumption,<br />

in particular rural spending. On top of that, <strong>the</strong> authority is also<br />

aware of <strong>the</strong> difficulties experienced by SMEs in this tough<br />

external environment - rising costs and competition. Hence,<br />

China has unveiled stimulus plans for 10 industries, to buoy<br />

confidence and support economic development. These are <strong>the</strong><br />

automobile, steel, shipbuilding, textiles, machinery, electronics<br />

and information technology, light industry, petrochemicals,<br />

nonferrous metals, and logistics industries.<br />

Money supply and loan growth had accelerated in January as a<br />

result of looser monetary controls and government calls to stepup<br />

credit support to <strong>the</strong> economy. That should lead to a more<br />

substantial pick-up in investment growth in mid-2009, which<br />

should make up for some of <strong>the</strong> shortfall in o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong><br />

economy. Jan09 PMI rose to 49 from a low of 38.8 in<br />

November. Although still below 50, <strong>the</strong> improvement shows<br />

that <strong>the</strong> fiscal stimulus is making an impact.<br />

The China 'A' share market is <strong>the</strong> best performing market to<br />

date. We expect <strong>the</strong> outperformance to continue and<br />

recommend buying into <strong>the</strong> A share ETF to sail with <strong>the</strong> macro<br />

tailwind. However, <strong>the</strong> 'H' share market, which is open to<br />

foreign investors, had underperformed in line with <strong>the</strong> Hong<br />

Kong market. We recommend buying into selective<br />

infrastructure sectors that will benefit from <strong>the</strong> stimulus plan.<br />

We also recommend buying into <strong>the</strong> banking sector on a macro<br />

call to benefit from anticipated strong loan growth, although<br />

22<br />

17<br />

12<br />

7<br />

M2<br />

2<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

credit growth<br />

2Q potential risks and drivers<br />

The worse than expected showing on <strong>the</strong> economic front, and<br />

apparent lack of progress on <strong>the</strong> financial bailout front have<br />

driven markets through our low-end targets in <strong>the</strong> first quarter.<br />

Announcements of fiscal stimulus and rate cuts in <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning of <strong>the</strong> year infused some excitement into <strong>the</strong> equities<br />

market and sparked a technical rally as markets rebounded<br />

from <strong>the</strong> October capitulation. But poor corporate results and<br />

economic data took over <strong>the</strong> limelight, and fear of fur<strong>the</strong>r US<br />

major corporate bankruptcies and US banks’ nationalization<br />

drove markets to a decade low in March.<br />

Moving into <strong>the</strong> second quarter, <strong>the</strong> market is looking to find a<br />

bottom on <strong>the</strong> economic front. Main risks ahead lie with <strong>the</strong><br />

external environment, which in turn will slow down domestic<br />

investment while rising unemployment is a threat to private<br />

consumption. The fur<strong>the</strong>r need to de-leverage and <strong>the</strong><br />

perception of growth will determine <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> credit<br />

down-cycle. Exports, machinery orders, manufacturing index,<br />

retail sales data and credit growth indicators remain to be<br />

watched.<br />

We see <strong>the</strong> broad market movements in <strong>the</strong> US as a main driver<br />

for Asian equities in <strong>the</strong> second quarter. The anxiety over <strong>the</strong><br />

result of US banks’ stress test and <strong>the</strong> appropriate remedy to be<br />

announced in April will hopefully throw a final capitulation,<br />

<strong>the</strong>reby providing an opportunity for a widening in <strong>the</strong><br />

Page 18


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

valuation gap towards an inflection point. Strain in <strong>the</strong> Eastern<br />

Europe’s economic and financial system is also a key risk to be<br />

watched in <strong>the</strong> second quarter, which may worsen <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

crisis of European banks and spark ano<strong>the</strong>r round of risk<br />

aversion.<br />

In local markets <strong>the</strong> torrent of rights issues will create a near<br />

term overhang on stocks. The rapid fall in interest rates and <strong>the</strong><br />

slew of fiscal stimulus already announced last quarter may<br />

immobilize fur<strong>the</strong>r market reaction. 1Q09 results season in US<br />

and Asia will also be closely watched. So far Citigroup had<br />

indicated it had a good beginning to <strong>the</strong> year. Hong Kong<br />

market may take a brea<strong>the</strong>r from <strong>the</strong> results season as it is not<br />

required of Hong Kong companies to report quarterly results. In<br />

China we look for more assuring data that <strong>the</strong> stimulus plan is<br />

working its way into <strong>the</strong> economy. We believe China ‘A’ shares<br />

will benefit directly from <strong>the</strong> positive macro picture while in ‘H’<br />

shares we believe targeted incentive sectors from <strong>the</strong> stimulus<br />

plan will benefit. Commodity price contract negotiations in<br />

April may induce some volatility in <strong>the</strong> coal and steel sector and<br />

an inflection point that <strong>the</strong> worst may be over for negative<br />

newsflow.<br />

Coming elections in India and Indonesia may create volatility in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se markets as <strong>the</strong> situation is still fluid. Malaysia’s UMNO<br />

elections and several by-elections may prove to be a non event<br />

as <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> current deputy prime minister (PM) being<br />

<strong>the</strong> next PM is expected. Meanwhile impeachment motion<br />

against <strong>the</strong> current PM in Thailand may bring Thai politics to<br />

<strong>the</strong> spot light again but poor economic outlook has taken<br />

precedence on <strong>the</strong> agenda right now. Our economist for<br />

Thailand, Ramya Suryanarayanan believes <strong>the</strong> downside risk to<br />

growth is high as <strong>the</strong> external environment remains fragile<br />

while stimulus plan for domestic demand growth may not be<br />

enough to offset <strong>the</strong> extreme weakness.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> last leg of <strong>the</strong> bear market rally should be as<br />

natural as <strong>the</strong> cycle itself - a potential pick up in demand and<br />

credit, low valuations, concerted global effort in confronting<br />

<strong>the</strong> financial crisis, and a plausible solution for US bad banks’<br />

assets. At this juncture some conditions seem to be in place,<br />

but all hinge on <strong>the</strong> US bailout plan and fur<strong>the</strong>r steps to be<br />

taken from <strong>the</strong> European central banks.<br />

Page 19


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

SUMMARY OF MARCO OUTLOOK<br />

(Excerpts from <strong>DBS</strong> Economics Markets Strategy 2Q09)<br />

CHINA (Chris Leung, chrisleung@dbs.com)<br />

• Bold and timely policies to counteract <strong>the</strong> global<br />

financial crisis have shown promising results. State<br />

banks have extended credit to support growth,<br />

resulting in a rebound in money and loan growth in<br />

<strong>the</strong> last few months<br />

• The government has increased <strong>the</strong> budget deficit for<br />

FY09/10 by more than four times from last year’s<br />

CNY180bn to CNY950bn. This is equivalent to 3% of<br />

GDP. High savings and low government debt will<br />

allow China to sustain an expansionary fiscal<br />

program more easily than o<strong>the</strong>r countries could<br />

• The long anticipated second stimulus package may<br />

have been postponed because of <strong>the</strong> better-thanexpected<br />

economic figures and <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />

CNY4trn fiscal package has yet to be fully unleashed<br />

• Our 2009 GDP forecast remains unchanged at 7.5%<br />

YoY<br />

• On <strong>the</strong> monetary policy front, <strong>the</strong> central bank may<br />

not cut interest rates as drastically as last year<br />

• The USD/CNY will remain stable at around 6.85<br />

despite <strong>the</strong> general weakening of exchange rates in<br />

Asia. A stable exchange rate is crucial in anchoring<br />

macroeconomic stability not only for China, but also<br />

for <strong>the</strong> rest of Asia<br />

STIMULUS<br />

Fiscal policy will remain as <strong>the</strong> key instrument for China to help<br />

prevent an economic free fall, while buying time for<br />

households and business enterprises to adjust <strong>the</strong>ir survival<br />

strategies. In fact, China has all <strong>the</strong> prerequisites to achieve a<br />

sustainable expansionary fiscal program. Firstly, aggregate<br />

savings/gross domestic savings as a share of GDP is over 50%.<br />

Secondly, public debt as a share of GDP is only estimated to<br />

reach 20% in 2008 by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Finance, and an even<br />

lower projection of 15.7% by The World Factbook. The budget<br />

deficit for FY09/10 will jump to around 3.0% of GDP to<br />

CNY950bn (more than four times from last year’s CNY180bn),<br />

compared to 1.1% and 1.9% in FY98/99 and FY99/00<br />

respectively, <strong>the</strong> government can comfortably finance <strong>the</strong><br />

deficit by issuing more domestic bonds.<br />

The fact that <strong>the</strong>re was no introduction of a second stimulus<br />

package during <strong>the</strong> National People’s Congress should be<br />

viewed positively because: 1) <strong>the</strong> government is confident<br />

China is on her way to achieve 8% YoY GDP growth; 2) <strong>the</strong><br />

impact of <strong>the</strong> CNY4trn fiscal package has yet to be fully<br />

unleashed; 3) China can still afford to wait and ‘save for <strong>the</strong><br />

rainy days’ should <strong>the</strong> global economy remain in <strong>the</strong> doldrums<br />

for a longer-than-expected period.<br />

LIQUIDITY & INTERST RATES<br />

The PBOC is unlikely to cut interest rates in 2009 as<br />

aggressively as last year. FX reserves increment amounted to<br />

only US$40bn in 4Q08, significantly smaller than <strong>the</strong> combined<br />

sum of trade surplus and FDI (US$130bn in 4Q) points to <strong>the</strong><br />

likelihood of short-term capital outflow. State banks are also<br />

shouldering <strong>the</strong> risk of high NPLs and more dramatic rate<br />

reductions may significantly impair <strong>the</strong>ir profit margins. In any<br />

case, interest rate cuts should not be viewed as <strong>the</strong> principle<br />

policy response to <strong>the</strong> current situation.<br />

CREDIT<br />

What sets China apart from <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world is <strong>the</strong><br />

absence of a credit crisis amongst state banks. State banks,<br />

under direct instructions from <strong>the</strong> authority, have rushed to<br />

extend credit to support economic growth. New loans made in<br />

<strong>the</strong> first two months of 2009 have already exceeded CNY2trn,<br />

representing over half of <strong>the</strong> total new lending in 2008.<br />

Premier Wen expects new loan growth in 2009 to exceed<br />

CNY5trn (around 15% of GDP).<br />

IMPACT<br />

With <strong>the</strong> current credit expansion under way, investment<br />

growth will show a more substantial rise in <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong><br />

year. The difference between M2 and M1, which is equivalent<br />

to deposits that are easily convertible to cash, has jumped 26%<br />

YoY in January. Quasi money has proved to be a good leading<br />

indicator of fixed asset investment of state owned enterprises<br />

in <strong>the</strong> past.<br />

Consumption indicators have been holding up decently so far.<br />

Chinese consumers are in a good position to withstand <strong>the</strong><br />

challenges ahead. Unlike o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> world, households<br />

are backed by large savings and have minimal debt burden.<br />

Easing inflationary pressure will also help support<br />

consumption. These conditions should complement <strong>the</strong><br />

country’s consumption-boosting measures well.<br />

As such, despite easing wage growth/rising unemployment, we<br />

expect household consumption to weaken only in a gradual<br />

manner. Nominal retail sales growth is forecasted to ease to<br />

around 15% YoY in <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> year, and should show<br />

signs of recovery in <strong>the</strong> latter half. Of note is also <strong>the</strong><br />

tremendous consumption potential from <strong>the</strong> rural areas, where<br />

rural population accounts for over 50% of total population.<br />

Page 20


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

SINGAPORE (Irvin Seah, irvinseah@dbs.com)<br />

• The economy shrunk by 4.2% YoY (-16.4% QoQ<br />

saar) in 4Q08, taking average growth to 1.1% in<br />

2008<br />

• Apart from <strong>the</strong> construction sector, which grew<br />

20.3%, key manufacturing and services sectors<br />

recorded slower growth of -4.1% and 4.7% last year<br />

• Singapore is expected to experience its worst ever<br />

economic performance this year with GDP growth<br />

likely to register -4.8%<br />

• Despite <strong>the</strong> dire economic conditions, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) will maintain<br />

its current neutral exchange rate policy stance in <strong>the</strong><br />

forthcoming meeting in April<br />

• A generous “Resilience Package” worth SGD 20.5bn<br />

will help to soften <strong>the</strong> pain but will not enable <strong>the</strong><br />

economy to avert a deep recession<br />

OUTLOOK<br />

On account of <strong>the</strong> sharp collapse in global demand and export<br />

sales, as well as <strong>the</strong> spillover effects from <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

meltdown to <strong>the</strong> real economy, we have recently lowered our<br />

growth for 2009 to -4.8%. This marks <strong>the</strong> worst recession in<br />

Singapore’s history, surpassing <strong>the</strong> previous low of -3.8%<br />

registered prior to independence in 1964. GDP growth will<br />

likely be stuck in negative territory for <strong>the</strong> first three quarters<br />

before reverting back to a mild positive growth in <strong>the</strong> fourth<br />

quarter. In addition, <strong>the</strong> growth contraction in <strong>the</strong> first quarter<br />

is expected to be <strong>the</strong> most severe at -7.8%, surpassing <strong>the</strong><br />

previous low of -6.5% registered in 3Q01. The outlook of <strong>the</strong><br />

Singapore economy will largely rest upon how <strong>the</strong> global<br />

economy recovers from this recession.<br />

STIMULUS<br />

Fiscal policy will shoulder <strong>the</strong> responsibility of helping <strong>the</strong><br />

economy cope with <strong>the</strong> current economic downturn. And that<br />

comes in <strong>the</strong> form of a generous “Resilience Package” worth<br />

SGD 20.5bn to help companies and households tide over this<br />

recession. Yet, despite innovative measures such as <strong>the</strong> Jobs<br />

Credit, <strong>the</strong> Special Risk Initiative (SRI) and <strong>the</strong> wide array of tax<br />

cuts, rebates, exemptions and grants, not to mention <strong>the</strong> sheer<br />

magnitude of <strong>the</strong> fiscal package - <strong>the</strong> largest ever - <strong>the</strong><br />

economy is unlikely to escape <strong>the</strong> onslaught of this global<br />

recession. The expansionary fiscal policy put forth will only<br />

soften <strong>the</strong> pain but will not be able to help <strong>the</strong> economy avert<br />

its worst ever recession.<br />

LIQUIDITY<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> tremendous risks to growth, we expect <strong>the</strong><br />

Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to stand pat on its<br />

current neutral exchange rate policy stance. Demand weakness<br />

is <strong>the</strong> key problem now, not export price competitiveness. A<br />

weaker currency will not be effective in boosting export sales if<br />

demand is not <strong>the</strong>re to begin with. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a weaker<br />

currency may be counterproductive if it increases <strong>the</strong> costs of<br />

imported materials for manufacturers who are already hit so<br />

badly on <strong>the</strong> export front. In addition, a depreciation bias has a<br />

tendency to increase expectations for more depreciation,<br />

creating more difficulties for <strong>the</strong> government to build up its<br />

foreign reserve. Asset prices will also come under pressure<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Sing dollar weakness, resulting in capital outflows,<br />

which will not be beneficial for <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

KNOCK-ON IMPACT<br />

The manufacturing sector was battered as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />

collapse in exports, underpinned by a drastic contraction of<br />

22.9% in 4Q08 in <strong>the</strong> electronics manufacturing segment. The<br />

SEMI book-to-bill ratio, a leading indicator for global<br />

electronics sales, has plunged to 0.48 in Jan09, from 0.96 in<br />

Oct08. Growth in <strong>the</strong> services sector contracted by 1.3% YoY<br />

in 4Q08, on <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong> sharp decline in <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

services sector (-8.1%). With risk appetite unlikely to improve<br />

any time soon, <strong>the</strong> financial services industry is expected to<br />

continue to languish for most part of this year. In addition,<br />

sectors such as <strong>the</strong> transport services, wholesale and retail<br />

trade services will continue to bear <strong>the</strong> downward pressure<br />

from <strong>the</strong> slowdown in global trade flows. Outlook for <strong>the</strong> real<br />

estate services will be underpinned by <strong>the</strong> down-cycle in <strong>the</strong><br />

property market while <strong>the</strong> tourism related industry will be<br />

affected by fur<strong>the</strong>r decline in tourist arrivals. In short, <strong>the</strong><br />

services sector, traditionally a stable and robust pillar of growth<br />

for Singapore, is expected to fare poorly this year. Full year<br />

growth for <strong>the</strong> sector is expected to contract by 3.1%, down<br />

from a growth of 4.7% last year. The construction sector<br />

remains <strong>the</strong> only engine in <strong>the</strong> economy that is still running<br />

hot. We expect <strong>the</strong> healthy pipeline of projects (e.g. Marina<br />

Bay Financial Centre, IRs, MRT Downtown line, Marina Coastal<br />

Expressway) as well as <strong>the</strong> injection from <strong>the</strong> government<br />

projects arising from <strong>the</strong> recent budget will keep growth<br />

buoyant in <strong>the</strong> sector going forward. This sector is expected to<br />

grow by 20.9% this year.<br />

Page 21


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

MALAYSIA (Irvin Seah, irvinseah@dbs.com)<br />

• GDP in 4Q08 grew by a mere 0.1% YoY on <strong>the</strong> back<br />

of <strong>the</strong> sharp decline in external demand and<br />

investment<br />

• All key sectors ei<strong>the</strong>r moderated or contracted, with<br />

manufacturing hit <strong>the</strong> hardest<br />

• The economy is expected to dip into a technical<br />

recession in 1H09 (two consecutive quarters of GDP<br />

contraction) and will most likely register a full year<br />

contraction of 1.2% this year<br />

• Bank Negara is expected to continue current policy<br />

rates by ano<strong>the</strong>r 50bps (to 1.50%) in 2Q09<br />

• A second stimulus package worth MYR 60bn will<br />

cushion <strong>the</strong> blow but is unlikely to avert a recession<br />

OUTLOOK<br />

Chances are high that Malaysia will enter a technical recession<br />

in 1H09 given current economic conditions. We expect <strong>the</strong><br />

Malaysia economy to experience a full-fledged recession with<br />

growth of -1.2% in 2009 with <strong>the</strong> first three quarters likely to<br />

be in negative year-on-year growth level. For 2010, we expect<br />

<strong>the</strong> economy to revert back to positive territory, but growth<br />

will likely be moderate at about 2.7%.<br />

STIMULUS<br />

In view of <strong>the</strong> deteriorating economic outlook, <strong>the</strong> Malaysia<br />

government announced a second stimulus package worth<br />

MYR 60bn in March. The package is equivalent to about 9%<br />

of GDP and will be implemented over 2009 and 2010.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> stimulus package was significantly larger than<br />

market expectations of MYR 15-30bn, our view is that even<br />

with <strong>the</strong> best plans on <strong>the</strong> table, much will depend on <strong>the</strong><br />

effective implementation of those measures in order to achieve<br />

<strong>the</strong> desired result. It is also crucial for <strong>the</strong> government to frontload<br />

<strong>the</strong>se measures, as GDP growth in 2009 will likely be<br />

worse than in 2010. More importantly, while <strong>the</strong> package will<br />

help to soften <strong>the</strong> pain on <strong>the</strong> ground, given <strong>the</strong> dire economic<br />

conditions a recession appears inevitable.<br />

LIQUIDITY & INTEREST RATES<br />

The central bank initiated its easing cycle last November, when<br />

inflation started to show clear signs of ebbing as growth,<br />

especially on <strong>the</strong> external front, headed south. Increasing<br />

downside risks to growth, as well as political impetus to<br />

support growth, could convince <strong>the</strong> central bank to ease rates<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r. We expect ano<strong>the</strong>r 50bps cut to 1.50%, by end of<br />

2Q09. Policy is likely to remain accommodative going into<br />

2010, as inflation is expected to average a modest 1.50%.<br />

KNOCK-ON IMPACT ON INVESTMENT AND CONSUMPTION<br />

The financial meltdown in Sep08 essentially delivered a<br />

massive shock wave across <strong>the</strong> global financial market and <strong>the</strong><br />

real economy. Apart from risk aversion and <strong>the</strong> credit crunch<br />

choking <strong>the</strong> banking system, global demand froze as<br />

consumers and businesses drastically cut back on expenditure.<br />

That caused <strong>the</strong> sharp collapse in exports in many regional<br />

economies. Malaysia was also affected. The sharp fall in<br />

commodity prices and collapse in global demand has taken <strong>the</strong><br />

wind out of Malaysia’s sails. More importantly, <strong>the</strong> global<br />

economy does not seem to be hitting a bottom any time soon,<br />

judging from <strong>the</strong> recent economic numbers. External demand<br />

will likely remain stuck in reverse gear, while domestic demand<br />

will not be of much help as investors and consumers are likely<br />

to rein in <strong>the</strong>ir expenditure and investments due to <strong>the</strong> gloomy<br />

outlook. Domestic business and consumer sentiment have<br />

deteriorated so rapidly that <strong>the</strong> indices compiled by <strong>the</strong><br />

Malaysia Institute of Economic <strong>Research</strong> have fallen like a rock<br />

in 2H08. Couple with <strong>the</strong> political quagmire that has been<br />

hoarding <strong>the</strong> limelight, and domestic demand will prove to be<br />

evermore absent as <strong>the</strong> economy struggles to stay afloat amid<br />

<strong>the</strong> global recession.<br />

RISKS<br />

With <strong>the</strong> inclusion of this stimulus package, <strong>the</strong> Federal<br />

Government now expects <strong>the</strong> budget deficit as a percentage<br />

of nominal GDP to increase to 7.6% this year, from an earlier<br />

estimate of 4.8%. None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> government is confident<br />

that <strong>the</strong> deficit can be financed from domestic sources and<br />

does not expect fur<strong>the</strong>r deficit financing to crowd out privatesector<br />

funding in <strong>the</strong> bond market. We believe that <strong>the</strong><br />

government should be able to manage this deficit increase<br />

given Malaysia’s strong external position, significant foreign<br />

reserves, and a robust current account surplus. However, credit<br />

rating agencies will surely be monitoring Malaysia’s fiscal<br />

position carefully for signs of fur<strong>the</strong>r deterioration. Even before<br />

<strong>the</strong> second stimulus package, Fitch had already placed<br />

Malaysia’s long-term local currency outlook (currently at A+)<br />

on negative watch. Our biggest concern is that <strong>the</strong> weakness<br />

in crude oil and palm oil prices since Jul08 could lead to a<br />

downward adjustment in revenue components like Petroleum<br />

Income Tax (PIT) which is currently Malaysia’s single biggest<br />

source of tax revenue. A decline in PIT revenues in 2009 and a<br />

worse than expected GDP could worsen <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

fiscal position. We expect <strong>the</strong> fiscal deficit position to<br />

eventually hit about 8.0% of nominal GDP by <strong>the</strong> end of FY09.<br />

Page 22


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

HONG KONG (Connie Tse connietse@dbs.com)<br />

• HK experienced its first year-on-year GDP<br />

contracted since 2003 in 4Q08<br />

• We expect a contraction of 5% YoY in Q2,<br />

before <strong>the</strong> economy begins to recover in 2H09<br />

• The 2009/10 budget focuses on measures that<br />

will have longer-term implications for <strong>the</strong><br />

economy. A substantial boost in <strong>the</strong> near-term<br />

is unlikely<br />

• Going forward, China remains key. The country<br />

has become an important driver in Asia.<br />

Importantly, recovery in Asia will not have to<br />

wait for a US recovery, as demonstrated in <strong>the</strong><br />

2000/01 crisis period. Given Hong Kong’s<br />

integration with <strong>the</strong> mainland, <strong>the</strong> territory will<br />

be among <strong>the</strong> first to benefit from recovery<br />

<strong>the</strong>re<br />

• We expect <strong>the</strong> economy to contract by 3.5%<br />

this year and to grow by 2.8% in 2010<br />

STIMULUS<br />

In <strong>the</strong> 2009/10 Budget presented last month, Financial<br />

Secretary Tsang made clear that <strong>the</strong> territory does not lack<br />

challenges. We take comfort in that <strong>the</strong> budget proposal lays<br />

<strong>the</strong> ground for plenty of long-term economic developments,<br />

ranging from fostering regional cooperation, pushing ahead<br />

with infrastructure projects, to cradling a technology-based<br />

economy. We expect fur<strong>the</strong>r details to be slowly unveiled<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> year. However, to <strong>the</strong> disappointment of<br />

some, <strong>the</strong> budget did not include substantial near-term<br />

economic boosts.<br />

LIQUIDITY & INTEREST RATES<br />

Inflationary pressure has eased on <strong>the</strong> back of weaker<br />

economic activity and lower commodity and oil prices. By<br />

Jan09, underlying inflation (which strips out <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s one-off concessions/relief measures) fell to 4.5%<br />

YoY, down from a cyclical peak of 6.3% YoY in Jul08. Going<br />

forward, we expect disinflation to persist, which should give<br />

consumer demand some support at this point of time. Apart<br />

from lower consumer goods prices, we are likely to see added<br />

downward pressure on private housing rentals amid <strong>the</strong><br />

housing downturn. The extended freeze on government fees<br />

till 2010, toge<strong>the</strong>r with o<strong>the</strong>r tax concessions, will also lessen<br />

inflationary pressure.<br />

Headline CPI inflation may dip into negative territory for a few<br />

months in mid-09, but it is expected to edge up as <strong>the</strong> effects<br />

of some of <strong>the</strong> previous concessionary measures fade out. Full<br />

year 2009 CPI inflation is projected to average 1.0% YoY,<br />

down from 4.3% YoY in 2008.<br />

KNOCK-ON IMPACT<br />

The second quarter is unlikely to be pretty. The real economy<br />

will be plagued by <strong>the</strong> lagged impacts of <strong>the</strong> previous shock<br />

caused by <strong>the</strong> credit crisis. We are likely to see steep rises in<br />

unemployment, deeper contractions in consumer spending<br />

and investments, and a fur<strong>the</strong>r correction in housing prices.<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> economy to undergo a larger contraction of<br />

over 5% YoY in Q2, before gradual recovery takes place in <strong>the</strong><br />

second half of <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> toughest challenges <strong>the</strong> territory will face is rising<br />

unemployment. As an international financial and business<br />

center, Hong Kong has been affected by <strong>the</strong> global business<br />

cost cutting exercises amid <strong>the</strong> global downturn. The<br />

deterioration in <strong>the</strong> labor market has been more rapid than<br />

anticipated. Against this backdrop, <strong>the</strong> government has<br />

allocated HK$1.6bn in <strong>the</strong> 2009/10 budget to generate jobs.<br />

Although this is a step in <strong>the</strong> right direction, we are not<br />

convinced that <strong>the</strong> generation of 62,000 jobs within a threeyear<br />

time span will have a drastic impact on <strong>the</strong> trend of rising<br />

unemployment. The grim global business outlook will continue<br />

to weigh on <strong>the</strong> labor market. We should see a persistent rise<br />

in <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate throughout <strong>the</strong> year, perhaps to as<br />

high as 6.4% by end-09.<br />

KEY DRIVER<br />

In <strong>the</strong> next few months, we are likely to receive more<br />

disappointing news from <strong>the</strong> G3, and a meaningful global<br />

recovery will take time. Our eyes, however, will be focused on<br />

China more than anywhere else. China has become an<br />

important driver in Asia. Importantly, recovery in Asia will not<br />

have to wait for a US recovery as demonstrated in <strong>the</strong> 2000/01<br />

crisis period (please refer to our note on Feb 6, 2009 by David<br />

Carbon: “Asia’s export collapse”). Given <strong>the</strong> increasing<br />

economic integration between Hong Kong and mainland<br />

China - be it through trade, financial/business services or<br />

tourism - Hong Kong will no doubt be <strong>the</strong> main beneficiary of<br />

China’s economic rebound.<br />

Page 23


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

THAILAND (Ramya Suryanarayanan, ramya@dbs.com)<br />

• Fourth quarter output dropped by a stunning 24%<br />

(QoQ, saar), led by a dramatic 50% drop in exports.<br />

We expect GDP to contract by 3.5% in 2009 and to<br />

grow by 3.8% in 2010<br />

• Since political uncertainties have curtailed domestic<br />

reforms and growth in <strong>the</strong> last few years, growth is<br />

almost entirely dependent on exports<br />

• The flip side of this drawback is <strong>the</strong> comfortable<br />

current account surplus position, low debt ratios and<br />

well capitalised banks - all major positives in this<br />

global turmoil<br />

• Apart from global developments, inventory correction<br />

is a major risk to <strong>the</strong> growth forecast. Unfortunately,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is not much more room for monetary or fiscal<br />

policy to counter <strong>the</strong> slowdown, going forward.<br />

OUTLOOK<br />

Fourth quarter output plunged a stunning 24% (QoQ, saar),<br />

almost twice market expectations. In on-year terms, output fell<br />

4.3% (YoY). This makes Thailand one of <strong>the</strong> worst hit<br />

economies in Asia. The culprit was <strong>the</strong> dramatic drop in<br />

exports which contracted 50% (QoQ, saar). Since political<br />

uncertainties have curtailed domestic reforms and growth in<br />

<strong>the</strong> last few years, Thailand depends almost entirely on exports<br />

to drive growth. The flip side of this drawback is Thailand’s<br />

comfortable current account surplus position, low debt ratios<br />

and well capitalised banks – all positives in this global turmoil.<br />

Going forward, much depends on <strong>the</strong> outlook for external<br />

demand and uncertainty remains high. In addition, from a<br />

supply-side perspective, inventory levels could prove to be a<br />

major risk to growth. We expect ano<strong>the</strong>r quarter of<br />

contraction of 5% (QoQ, saar) in 1Q09 mainly on continued<br />

inventory correction, followed by a rise in output of 5% (QoQ,<br />

saar) from 2Q09-4Q09. As <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>the</strong> low base wears<br />

off, growth should slip to 3% (QoQ, saar) in 2010. This path<br />

would imply annual average growth of -3.5% in 2009 and<br />

3.8% in 2010.<br />

STIMULUS, INTEREST RATES<br />

Going forward, <strong>the</strong>re is not much additional room for<br />

monetary or fiscal policy. Rates are already low at 1.5%. We<br />

expect at least ano<strong>the</strong>r 50bps of rate cuts in 2Q09. While our<br />

banking analyst Suggitra doesn’t forsee a sharp rise in nonperforming<br />

loans, she also doesn’t expect banks to be able to<br />

match <strong>the</strong> central bank’s rate cuts. On <strong>the</strong> fiscal side, shortfall<br />

in revenues have already pushed January’s fiscal deficit (saar)<br />

to a stunning 13% of GDP. This would make it hard for <strong>the</strong><br />

government to meet expenditure targets (though <strong>the</strong> deficit<br />

should reach 4% of GDP). Debt management laws will likely<br />

be a binding restriction on expenditure in <strong>the</strong> face of revenue<br />

shortfalls.<br />

KNOCK-ON IMPACT<br />

The only thing booming in Thailand <strong>the</strong> last few years has<br />

been exports, especially automobiles and electronics. These<br />

account for half of manufacturing exports, and are highly<br />

cyclical and dependent on credit. This may explain <strong>the</strong><br />

dramatic drop in exports in recent months. Ano<strong>the</strong>r aspect of<br />

<strong>the</strong> export dynamic is Thailand’s growing linkages with China<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r emerging markets. The share of exports heading to<br />

China has doubled from 5% in 2002 to 10% in 2007. While<br />

<strong>the</strong> recent fall-off in exports is broad-based, exports to China<br />

and HK dropped significantly in Aug08, well before <strong>the</strong><br />

escalation of <strong>the</strong> financial crisis in mid-Sep08 and well before<br />

<strong>the</strong> deterioration in exports to o<strong>the</strong>r countries. This suggests<br />

that a post-Olympics bust in China is also a major factor<br />

explaining <strong>the</strong> dramatic slowdown in Thai exports (see<br />

economic overview). This provides some consolation as<br />

demand from China could improve somewhat when <strong>the</strong><br />

‘Olympic effect’ wears off. Export levels already appear to have<br />

stabilized in Dec08 and Jan09. We expect a sequential pick up<br />

in exports going forward to restrict <strong>the</strong> annual average decline<br />

in dollar exports to -15% in 2009 (vs -25% YoY in Jan09) and<br />

for exports to register 7% growth in 2010. In contrast, imports<br />

have room to drop and fell sharply lower in Jan09. This should<br />

also help improve <strong>the</strong> net export readings and thus support<br />

economic growth in 1Q09.<br />

KEY RISK<br />

Inventory correction poses a big risk to <strong>the</strong> growth outlook.<br />

Shipments have fallen 30-40% but inventory levels have not.<br />

The inventory-shipment ratio has, <strong>the</strong>refore, risen to over<br />

140%. We cannot read too much from this data given its<br />

dubious quality, but it appears to be a reasonable estimate, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> present instance. After all, production has only fallen in<br />

line with shipments. To run down inventories, or to bring it in<br />

line with <strong>the</strong> new lower level of shipments, production would<br />

have to fall faster than shipments. It is for this reason that we<br />

pencil in a contraction in 1Q09 output, despite <strong>the</strong> sharp drop<br />

in 4Q08 and a stabilization in exports. In fact, <strong>the</strong> risk is that<br />

de-stocking is sharper than we think and lasts through 2Q09.<br />

In this case, <strong>the</strong> hit to GDP growth in 2009 would be severe<br />

(however, <strong>the</strong> up-turn when shipments pick up would be that<br />

much sharper).<br />

Page 24


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

INDONESIA (Lim Su Sian, limsusian@dbs.com)<br />

• Given <strong>the</strong> sharp global downturn, it is inevitable that<br />

growth will continue to slow. Still, owing to its low<br />

export dependency, Indonesia should be able to<br />

grow 4.3% this year. That’s <strong>the</strong> slowest pace since<br />

2001, but still <strong>the</strong> third-fastest in <strong>the</strong> region behind<br />

China and India<br />

• As external demand continues to retreat, net exports<br />

will contribute less to growth. This will continue to<br />

have spill-over effects on consumer and business<br />

spending, as was already seen in 4Q08<br />

• Both fiscal and monetary policy will help ease <strong>the</strong><br />

blow. This year’s IDR 139.5trn budget deficit (2.5%<br />

of GDP) includes a stimulus package of IDR 73.3trn.<br />

The central bank will cut policy rates by ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

100bps to 6.75%. An easing in inflation to 6% this<br />

year should provide room for fur<strong>the</strong>r policy<br />

accommodation<br />

• The key risk is external demand with data showing<br />

no arrest in <strong>the</strong> free-fall of exports. Ideally, foreign<br />

exchange reserves would be higher, though <strong>the</strong>y<br />

remain adequate. Risks on <strong>the</strong> political front remain<br />

low. Political parties will coalesce with greater<br />

intensity in <strong>the</strong> months ahead but President<br />

Yudhoyono remains <strong>the</strong> favourite to win <strong>the</strong> July 8<br />

election<br />

OUTLOOK<br />

In <strong>the</strong> coming quarters, we believe growth is likely to continue<br />

losing traction at least until 4Q09. Our forecast is predicated<br />

on <strong>the</strong> view that, as <strong>the</strong> commodity cycle continues to wind<br />

down in tandem with <strong>the</strong> retreat in global economic activity,<br />

exports will start to contract and remain in negative territory,<br />

possibly up to <strong>the</strong> third quarter. Low as Indonesia’s exportdependency<br />

is (it has an export-to-GDP ratio of around 30%),<br />

this will continue to have spill-over effects on <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

economy, as <strong>the</strong> fourth-quarter GDP figures so clearly suggest.<br />

STIMULUS, INTEREST RATES<br />

Both monetary and fiscal policies have been expansionary. This<br />

year’s budget deficit comes to IDR 139.5trn, or 2.5% of GDP.<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> largest deficit since 2001, and a similar deficit-to-<br />

GDP ratio in 2001 and in 1999, when <strong>the</strong> government needed<br />

to recapitalize <strong>the</strong> banking system following <strong>the</strong> Asian financial<br />

crisis. The deficit includes spending for a stimulus package of<br />

IDR 73.3trn, effective March 1. While any stimulus is<br />

welcomed at this point, we doubt <strong>the</strong>re will be significant<br />

multiplier effects from <strong>the</strong> package. 80% of <strong>the</strong> package will<br />

likely be in <strong>the</strong> form of tax measures, which will not give much<br />

bang for <strong>the</strong> buck considering Indonesia’s low tax –to-GDP<br />

ratio of 12%. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, while <strong>the</strong> package takes a<br />

business-centric approach with its focus on cost reduction,<br />

measures with spillover effects into business and consumer<br />

spending are lacking.<br />

BI has slashed its policy rate by 175bps since Nov08, and <strong>the</strong><br />

overnight reference rate now stands at a record low of 7.75%.<br />

Although tight liquidity conditions have prevented <strong>the</strong> rate<br />

cuts from fully translating into lower money market or lending<br />

rates, standing pat in <strong>the</strong> coming months is not an option.<br />

Assuming <strong>the</strong> rupiah does not depreciate sharply (posing<br />

upside risk to inflation), we expect it to cut rates by ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

100bps, to 6.75%. Easing inflation will certainly provide room<br />

for fur<strong>the</strong>r policy accommodation. As GDP growth falls below<br />

potential and global food and commodity prices remain much<br />

lower when compared to a year ago, we look for headline CPI<br />

to ease to 6.0% this year, from 9.3% in 2008.<br />

KNOCK-ON IMPACT<br />

We think <strong>the</strong> decline in Indonesia’s exports will start to have an<br />

even more noticeable impact on <strong>the</strong> domestic economy.<br />

Sustained output cuts by miners, manufacturers and related<br />

industries will spill over into business spending decisions –<br />

plant and equipment purchases, employment hires – with a<br />

lag. As employers cut wages and even jobs, <strong>the</strong> exporttriggered<br />

slowdown will spill fur<strong>the</strong>r out to households. Key<br />

indicators like retail and motorbike sales have softened quite<br />

rapidly.<br />

KEY RISK<br />

Key risk pertains to <strong>the</strong> level of Indonesia’s FX reserves and its<br />

adequacy in dealing with short-term capital outflows. Given<br />

<strong>the</strong> elevated sense of risk aversion facing <strong>the</strong> rupiah – as well<br />

as various o<strong>the</strong>r currencies in emerging Asia – <strong>the</strong> level of<br />

foreign exchange reserves should ideally be higher. We believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> level of reserves to be adequate. Following a USD 3bn<br />

global bond issue in February, reserves have now risen again to<br />

about USD 53.7bn, which is around 8.5 months of imports and<br />

around 1.13x times of estimated short term external debt. For<br />

now, risks to <strong>the</strong> economy stemming from political change also<br />

appear to be low. Legislative elections have been set for April<br />

9, after which presidential elections will take place on July 8.<br />

Vice President Jusuf Kalla has already announced that he will<br />

compete against President Yudhoyono in <strong>the</strong> presidential<br />

election, but polls still tip <strong>the</strong> latter as a clear favourite,<br />

regardless of his running mate.<br />

Page 25


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

INDIA (Ramya Suryanarayanan, ramya@dbs.com)<br />

• Growth will slow to 6.1% and 4.5% in FY08 and<br />

FY09, compared to 9% clocked in previous years.<br />

Yet, this is a lesser worry than <strong>the</strong> growing<br />

imbalances, especially <strong>the</strong> twin deficits, and <strong>the</strong><br />

recent monetisation of debt<br />

• In FY2008, <strong>the</strong> central government deficit (off-budget<br />

items included) has widened to nearly 10% of GDP,<br />

against an originally planned 2.5% of GDP. This is<br />

not due to stimulus measures, but is a consequence<br />

of <strong>the</strong> government’s choice of “populist” policies and<br />

“short-term” solutions<br />

• A large captive market (domestic banks), a high<br />

savings rate and a comfortable external position<br />

should limit <strong>the</strong> risks to growth and stability, but not<br />

eliminate <strong>the</strong>m<br />

• Importantly, though, <strong>the</strong> positive experience with<br />

growth and reforms in <strong>the</strong> past decade will keep<br />

policies pointed in <strong>the</strong> right direction. We expect<br />

growth to recover to 6.8% in FY10<br />

• Though inflation is not an immediate concern, <strong>the</strong><br />

room for rate cuts has fallen substantially given<br />

inflation risks from deficit financing<br />

OUTLOOK<br />

We expect GDP growth to slow to 6.1% and 4.5% in FY08<br />

(ends Mar09) and FY09, substantially lower than <strong>the</strong> 9%<br />

clocked in previous years. On <strong>the</strong> basis of our global growth<br />

outlook as well as <strong>the</strong> domestic dynamics, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

Indian economy should bottom in <strong>the</strong> first half of 2009. Yet,<br />

this is a lesser worry than <strong>the</strong> growing imbalances, especially<br />

<strong>the</strong> twin deficits.<br />

STIMULUS<br />

In <strong>the</strong> period spanning December-February, <strong>the</strong> government<br />

has come up with three stimulus packages. The policy<br />

measures consisted mainly of 200-600bps of cuts in excise<br />

duty, central sales tax, services tax and VAT. O<strong>the</strong>r measures<br />

included loan guarantees, interest subsidies, a plan to boost<br />

state bank capital ratios (average risk weighted capital<br />

adequacy ratio already at 12%), temporary suspension of<br />

interest ceilings on external commercial borrowings (ECB) and<br />

higher limits on foreign investment in domestic corporate<br />

bonds. Separately, <strong>the</strong> central bank has also introduced several<br />

measures to ease liquidity and improve credit delivery, chief of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se being a forex swap facility to banks to meet dollar<br />

liquidity requirements.<br />

INTEREST RATES<br />

Wholesale prices have fallen sharply since August in line with<br />

commodity prices but in contrast, consumer prices have not<br />

fallen at all. This restricts <strong>the</strong> manoeuvring room for <strong>the</strong> central<br />

bank. As it is, <strong>the</strong> conversion of MSS bonds into government<br />

debt would keep <strong>the</strong> central bank cautious in lowering rates.<br />

We prefer not to forecast more than 50bps of rate cuts.<br />

External commercial borrowings - an important source of credit<br />

to corporates - has shown an encouraging pick up. The<br />

average borrowings in December and January is almost twice<br />

that in October and November. Domestic credit also has picked<br />

up in recent weeks and months. Broad money growth remains<br />

decent at circa 20% YoY supported by growth in credit to <strong>the</strong><br />

government. The on-year rate would increase going forward, if<br />

<strong>the</strong> sequential growth rates are any indication. January and<br />

February (data till mid-Feb) recorded 25-30% (MoM, saar)<br />

expansion. Credit extended to <strong>the</strong> commercial sector has also<br />

jumped by almost 25% (MoM, saar) in February after two<br />

months of nearly no increase. We have also seen a big jump in<br />

vehicle sales in February, probably a reflection of lower rates as<br />

well as pent up demand.<br />

RISK<br />

While <strong>the</strong> justifications given for <strong>the</strong> fiscal deterioration is <strong>the</strong><br />

financial meltdown, <strong>the</strong> fiscal position was deteriorating even<br />

before <strong>the</strong> slowdown began. The fiscal deficit is already in<br />

double digits as a share of GDP. Deficits, at <strong>the</strong> minimum,<br />

crowd out private investment and constrain much needed<br />

social and physical investments. This, in turn, restricts <strong>the</strong> longterm<br />

growth potential. Perhaps most importantly for <strong>the</strong><br />

outlook, <strong>the</strong> weakening fiscal position is actually a<br />

consequence of <strong>the</strong> government’s choice of “populist” policies<br />

and “short-term” solutions – itself, probably a consequence of<br />

uneven growth and poor governance. These are not factors<br />

that inspire confidence over sustainability of growth. Ratings<br />

agencies have not downgraded <strong>the</strong> ratings (only <strong>the</strong> outlook<br />

on <strong>the</strong> ratings has been revised to negative), waiting to see<br />

post-election policy trend instead.<br />

Page 26


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

KOREA (Ma Tie Ying, matieying@dbs.com)<br />

• The outlook for domestic demand is worrisome given<br />

<strong>the</strong> surge in banks’ external debt servicing costs and<br />

<strong>the</strong> drop in incomes resulting from <strong>the</strong> export<br />

collapse. Deleveraging looks set to continue<br />

• Korea’s external position is likely to remain under<br />

pressure in <strong>the</strong> near term, due to uncertainty over<br />

foreign capital outflows amid prolonged global<br />

financial market volatility. The situation will only<br />

improve after global risk appetite recovers and/or <strong>the</strong><br />

current account returns to surplus<br />

• Macro policies need to be carried out carefully.<br />

Aggressive fiscal stimulus plans could tighten liquidity<br />

and push up interest rates once again. Aggressive<br />

monetary easing increases <strong>the</strong> risk of capital outflows<br />

and currency depreciation<br />

STIMULUS<br />

Like most countries in <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong> Korean government has<br />

introduced fiscal packages to counter <strong>the</strong> recession. The 2009<br />

budget approved by <strong>the</strong> parliament in Dec08 included tax cuts<br />

and higher government spending (mainly on infrastructure<br />

projects) amounting to KRW 33trn (3.5% of GDP). The finance<br />

ministry is now mulling a supplementary budget. We estimate<br />

that <strong>the</strong> consolidated central government fiscal balance will<br />

deteriorate from a small surplus of 0%-1% of GDP last year, to<br />

a deficit of 3% of GDP this year.<br />

LIQUIDITY & INTEREST RATES<br />

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has cut rates by a total of 325bps<br />

since Oct08, bringing <strong>the</strong> benchmark 7-day repo rate to a<br />

record low of 2.0%. The BOK has also actively injected liquidity<br />

into <strong>the</strong> financial system through more purchase of repos,<br />

early redemption of monetary stabilization bonds and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

measures. Governor Lee said at <strong>the</strong> February policy meeting<br />

that quantitative easing could be an option in <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

The lingering weakness in <strong>the</strong> country’s external position and<br />

downward pressure on <strong>the</strong> Korean won suggest that <strong>the</strong> BOK<br />

must tread carefully. In particular, quantitative easing could<br />

undermine investor confidence in local currency assets.<br />

We think <strong>the</strong> door is still open for continued rate cuts in 2Q09,<br />

assuming that <strong>the</strong> FX market will stabilize alongside a<br />

continuous improvement in <strong>the</strong> current account balance. The<br />

odds of <strong>the</strong> BOK cutting rates to zero and/or pursuing a<br />

quantitative easing tack are low in our view. At <strong>the</strong> end of this<br />

easing cycle, we may well find that <strong>the</strong> BOK had every<br />

intention of maintaining an interest rate differential with <strong>the</strong><br />

world’s major central banks.<br />

KNOCK-ON IMPACT<br />

Going forward, <strong>the</strong> outlook for domestic demand is weak as<br />

de-leveraging continues. Bank lending growth has been<br />

slowing since 3Q08, a result of tightening credit to smallmedium<br />

enterprises. As a result, broad money supply growth<br />

has also been trending down, even as base money has<br />

expanded on liquidity injections by <strong>the</strong> central bank.<br />

Credit as a percentage of GDP continues to grow but whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

this will continue is doubtful. Banks’ balance sheets are under<br />

pressure, owing to <strong>the</strong> surge in <strong>the</strong>ir external debt-servicing<br />

costs. Credit risks are also increasing. A rising number of<br />

companies (especially SMEs in <strong>the</strong> export-oriented industry) are<br />

suffering profit declines and delinquency ratios are rising .<br />

Households are also facing deteriorating labor market<br />

conditions. Although <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate has risen only<br />

marginally so far, it masks a very evident drop in <strong>the</strong> labor<br />

participation rate . As such, a fur<strong>the</strong>r downward correction in<br />

<strong>the</strong> credit cycle appears likely. This would drive continued<br />

weakness in domestic demand.<br />

RISK<br />

The country’s external position is likely to remain under<br />

pressure in <strong>the</strong> near term. The collapse in exports has dealt a<br />

blow to <strong>the</strong> current account balance, just when it had begun<br />

to improve on <strong>the</strong> back of cheaper commodity imports. More<br />

significantly, amid prolonged financial market volatility,<br />

uncertainty remains high over whe<strong>the</strong>r foreign investors will<br />

unload holdings of Korean financial assets and/or fur<strong>the</strong>r cut<br />

credit to Korean borrowers. So far, Korea’s sovereign credit<br />

ratings remain stable, but risks remain that fur<strong>the</strong>r economic<br />

deterioration could lead to capital outflows and future<br />

downgrades, as highlighted by Fitch’s Nov08 move. An<br />

improvement in Korea’s external position (hence underpinning<br />

<strong>the</strong> Korean won) requires a return of global risk appetite,<br />

and/or dollar inflows secured through a current account<br />

surplus. The former is difficult to predict. But <strong>the</strong> current<br />

account should return to surplus in 2Q09. In our view, <strong>the</strong><br />

recent free-fall in exports may have been exaggerated by <strong>the</strong><br />

collapse in global sentiment following <strong>the</strong> financial market<br />

meltdown. Meanwhile, imports should continue falling on <strong>the</strong><br />

back of weaker domestic demand and lower commodity prices.<br />

An already-sizeable depreciation in <strong>the</strong> Korean won to-date<br />

has also helped to narrow <strong>the</strong> services deficit, as expenditure<br />

on services overseas (such as travel and education) has been<br />

increasingly curbed by a more expensive US dollar . To that<br />

end, we continue to project a current account surplus for 2009,<br />

at around 2% of GDP.<br />

Page 27


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

TAIWAN (Ma Tie Ying, matieying@dbs.com)<br />

• The steep downturn in <strong>the</strong> economy owes to an<br />

unprecedented collapse in exports. We do not expect<br />

things to worsen fur<strong>the</strong>r from 2Q09, as <strong>the</strong> plunge<br />

may have been exaggerated due to fear / shock<br />

factors, and more importantly, China’s demand<br />

should improve this year<br />

• But until exports recover, Taiwan is unlikely to<br />

emerge from recession. The propensity to save is high<br />

and public confidence is weak. The effectiveness of<br />

macro stimulus policies will hence be limited<br />

STIMULUS<br />

Like many economies in <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong> Taiwanese government<br />

has adopted a string of fiscal stimulus measures to combat<br />

recession. The package includes distributing consumer<br />

shopping vouchers, expanding public infrastructure<br />

construction, offering various tax breaks and subsidies,<br />

promoting job creation etc. All toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> government<br />

estimates that <strong>the</strong>se measures will reduce <strong>the</strong> contraction in<br />

real GDP in 2009 by 2.77ppt.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong>re is additional scope on <strong>the</strong> fiscal front, given<br />

that government debt level is healthy at around 40% of GDP,<br />

and abundant private sector savings and extremely low interest<br />

rates. It remains to be seen whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> government will take<br />

bolder moves in <strong>the</strong> next several months.<br />

LIQUIDTY & INTEREST RATES<br />

Taiwan’s central bank has cut rates by a total of 237.5bps<br />

since Sep08, taking <strong>the</strong> benchmark rediscount rate to an alltime<br />

low of 1.25%. The overnight interbank rate has even<br />

fallen to almost zero (0.15% by mid-March). Liquidity is not<br />

really a problem in Taiwan because of strong private sector<br />

savings. Interestingly, liquidity supply has even expanded<br />

alongside <strong>the</strong> deepening of global financial crisis, because of<br />

rising funds inflows from Taiwanese residents repatriating <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

overseas investment. In addition, despite <strong>the</strong> plunge in exports,<br />

trade and current account balance continued to widen due to<br />

even faster declines in imports. Money supply growth has<br />

accelerated at <strong>the</strong> same time.<br />

CREDIT<br />

Banks still have low appetite to lend because of increasing<br />

worries on loan quality deterioration. Excess reserves among<br />

financial institutions have jumped to TWD 123.2bn in Jan09<br />

from an average of TWD 20bn last year. Bank lending growth<br />

– although <strong>the</strong>re was no overheating to begin with - has fallen<br />

since Dec08, led by loans to private enterprises especially those<br />

in export industries.<br />

To channel liquidity from banks to <strong>the</strong> productive areas in <strong>the</strong><br />

economy, <strong>the</strong> stimulus effects of rate cuts are tapering off. We<br />

believe that Taiwan’s monetary easing cycle is already close to<br />

an end. The policy focus is likely to shift to micro measures in<br />

our view, such as providing credit-guarantees for new loans,<br />

leading banks to arrange debt rescheduling with <strong>the</strong> existing<br />

borrowers who suffered cash flow difficulties, and even<br />

offering direct financial assistance to <strong>the</strong> troubled industries<br />

(such as <strong>the</strong> latest bail-out for <strong>the</strong> DRAM industry).<br />

KNOCK-ON IMPACT<br />

Taiwan’s exports plunged by <strong>the</strong> most among all <strong>the</strong> Asian<br />

economies we cover, led by demand from China, Taiwan’s<br />

largest trade partner. In our view, <strong>the</strong> factors explaining this<br />

sharp contraction in external trade are partly genuine - <strong>the</strong><br />

slowdown of China and <strong>the</strong> recession of developed<br />

economies, and partly distorted and probably short-lived - <strong>the</strong><br />

payback in demand from China following <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

Aug08 Olympics and <strong>the</strong> collapse of global business sentiment<br />

in <strong>the</strong> aftermath of <strong>the</strong> US financial meltdown in Sep/Oct08<br />

(see “Asia’s export collapse”, Feb 6th). There is a good chance<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Chinese economy to recover this year thanks to<br />

aggressive stimulus policies. Several mega Taiwanese tech<br />

companies recently announced that <strong>the</strong>y have received new<br />

orders from China, thanks to a government-backed scheme of<br />

popularizing <strong>the</strong> use of electrical & electronics products in<br />

China’s rural regions. We are relatively less pessimistic (than<br />

<strong>the</strong> markets) on this front and expect exports and also <strong>the</strong><br />

overall economy to touch a bottom in 1Q09.<br />

Until exports make a revival, Taiwan will find it hard to get out<br />

of recession relying on domestic demand. The Taiwanese<br />

economy holds persistently strong surplus savings. Taiwan’s<br />

high saving propensity is associated with structural issues,<br />

including slow wage growth and weak consumer confidence<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> political environment. Although <strong>the</strong> new<br />

government taking office last year has been striving to push<br />

forward economic reforms, external conditions have<br />

deteriorated rapidly and severely before things are given time<br />

to change. In fact, <strong>the</strong> private sector – households in particular<br />

– should have even more sufficient reasons to increase <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

savings now due to <strong>the</strong> rise in job/income insecurity. The slump<br />

in exports has heavily hit <strong>the</strong> island’s labor market.<br />

Employment growth fell into negative territory since Nov08.<br />

The jobless rate shot up to a seven year high of 5.3% (sa) by<br />

Jan09, more than 1 percentage point higher than <strong>the</strong> stable<br />

3.9% in 1Q-3Q08.<br />

Page 28


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Appendix I – Forecast trading range established from<br />

valuations. Valuation parameters are chosen from best indicator<br />

from back testing in our valuations models. Asia ex-Japan<br />

forecast return of 23% from current levels (fig 30).<br />

Fig. 26: Singapore STI and price to book value trading bands<br />

Fig. 28: Thailand SETI and price to book value trading bands<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

+1SD<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

+1SD<br />

Avg<br />

3000<br />

Avg<br />

600<br />

-1SD<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

-1SD<br />

-2SD<br />

400<br />

-2SD<br />

200<br />

0<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

-2SD -1SD Average PTBV<br />

Index range 1696 2274 2852<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price to book value trends.<br />

Current STI level: 1691, P/B 0.8x<br />

-2SD -1SD Average PTBV<br />

Index range 380 608 837<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price to book value trends.<br />

Current SET 438, P/B 1.2x<br />

Fig. 29: Korea KOSPI and price to book value trading bands<br />

2000<br />

Fig. 27: Hong Kong HSI and price to book value trading bands<br />

35000<br />

30000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

+1SD<br />

Avg<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

+1SD<br />

Avg<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

-1SD<br />

-2SD<br />

15000<br />

-1SD<br />

400<br />

10000<br />

-2SD<br />

200<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

-2SD -1SD Average PTBV<br />

Index range 10540 14117 17693<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price to book value trends.<br />

Current HSI level: 13622, P/B, 1.2x<br />

-2SD -1SD Average PTBV<br />

Index range 698 983 1269<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price to book value trends.<br />

Current KOSPI level: 1229, P/B 1.14x.<br />

Page 29


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 30: MSCI AXJ index and price to book value trading bands<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

Fig. 32: H-share index and fwd PER trading band<br />

16000<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

+1SD<br />

500<br />

400<br />

+1SD<br />

Avg<br />

-1SD<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

Avg<br />

-1SD<br />

300<br />

200<br />

-2SD<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

-2SD<br />

100<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

-2SD -1SD Average PTBV<br />

Index range 282 366 451<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price to book value trend.<br />

Current MSCI AXJ level: 366, P/B 1.38x.<br />

0<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

-2SD -1SD Average fwd PE<br />

Index range 2806 6308 9810<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price-earnings trend. Current H-<br />

share index level: 7967, fwd P/E 10.4x<br />

Fig. 31: Taiwan TWI and historical P/E trading band<br />

Fig. 33: Malaysia KLCI and dividend yield trading band<br />

16000<br />

2000<br />

14000<br />

+1SD<br />

1800<br />

Avg<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

Avg<br />

-1SD<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

-1SD<br />

-2SD<br />

4000<br />

-2SD<br />

600<br />

2000<br />

400<br />

0<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

-2SD -1SD AveragePE<br />

Index range 3487 7290 11093<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price-earnings trend. Current<br />

TWI level: 5346, P/E 9.7x<br />

200<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

-2SD -1SD Average DY<br />

Index range 1040 1333 1854<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price-earnings trend. Current<br />

KLCI level: 879, fwd dividend yield 5.4%<br />

Page 30


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 34: Indonesia JCI and dividend yield trading band<br />

Fig. 35: India Sensex and and historical P/E trading band<br />

3500<br />

20000<br />

3000<br />

Avg<br />

18000<br />

16000<br />

+1SD<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

-1SD<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

Avg<br />

1500<br />

-2SD<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

-1SD<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

-2SD<br />

0<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

-2SD -1SD Average DY<br />

Index range 1599 2084 2990<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price-earnings trend. Current JCI<br />

index level: 1419 and dividend yield 4.7%<br />

0<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11<br />

-2SD -1SD Average PE<br />

Index range 3002 7976 12949<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Shaded areas are recession periods. Bands<br />

are ‘+1SD, Average, -1SD, and -2SD price-earnings trend. Current H-<br />

share index level: 9667, historical P/E 13.3x<br />

Page 31


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Appendix II – Money supply growth and stock market<br />

performance<br />

Fig. 38: India Sensex and M2 money supply, %yoy (rsquare=46%)<br />

Fig. 36: Singapore STI and M2 money supply, %yoy (rsquare=23%)<br />

150<br />

% %<br />

30<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

% %<br />

-60<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-50<br />

-100<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Stock Index (L)<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>.<br />

M2 growth (R)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Stock Index (L)<br />

M2 growth (R)<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>.<br />

Fig. 37: Hong Kong HSI and M2 money supply, %yoy (rsquare=56%)<br />

% %<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

-60<br />

-80<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Stock Index (L)<br />

M2 growth (R)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>.<br />

Page 32


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Disclaimer:<br />

The information herein is published by <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd (<strong>the</strong> "Company"). It is based on information obtained from sources believed<br />

to be reliable, but <strong>the</strong> Company does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy,<br />

completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any<br />

recommendation contained here in does not have regard to <strong>the</strong> specific investment objectives, financial situation and <strong>the</strong><br />

particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for <strong>the</strong> information of addressees only and is not to<br />

be taken in substitution for <strong>the</strong> exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The<br />

Company, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with <strong>the</strong> group accepts no liability for any direct, special,<br />

indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any o<strong>the</strong>r loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of <strong>the</strong> information<br />

herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or o<strong>the</strong>rwise) or fur<strong>the</strong>r communication <strong>the</strong>reof, even if<br />

<strong>the</strong> Company or any o<strong>the</strong>r person has been advised of <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>the</strong>reof. The information herein is not to be construed as an<br />

offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or o<strong>the</strong>r financial instruments or to provide any<br />

investment advice or services. The Company and its associates, <strong>the</strong>ir directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r interests in, and may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform broking,<br />

investment banking and o<strong>the</strong>r banking or financial services for <strong>the</strong>se companies. The information herein is not intended for<br />

distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to<br />

law or regulation.<br />

Page 33


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Regional Data Monitor<br />

Funds Monitor<br />

US Funds Flow into Asian <strong>Equities</strong>, by Country<br />

US$m 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08<br />

Hong Kong Net purchase of -7,674 -2,171 94 -8,592 -1,513<br />

equities by US seller seller buyer seller seller<br />

HSI 29,270 23,546 24,130 20,670 14,081<br />

Singapore Net purchase of 2,021 -964 -897 543 -4,067<br />

equities by US buyer seller seller buyer seller<br />

STI 3,575 3,005 3,096 2,676 1,763<br />

Malaysia Net purchase of 371 301 -155 -419 -248<br />

equities by US buyer buyer seller seller seller<br />

KLCI 1,419 1,333 1,248 1,094 869<br />

Thailand Net purchase of 63 161 -731 89 -243<br />

equities by US buyer buyer seller buyer seller<br />

SET 871 816 812 652 423<br />

Philippine Net purchase of 119 57 -7 -13 -95<br />

equities by US buyer buyer seller seller seller<br />

PCOMP 3,653 3,127 2,679 2,612 1,932<br />

Indonesia Net purchase of -88 -364 385 11 98<br />

equities by US seller seller buyer buyer buyer<br />

JCI 2,693 2,599 2,366 2,101 1,285<br />

Korea Net purchase of -1,245 1,850 -1,034 -3,526 -1,517<br />

equities by US seller buyer seller seller seller<br />

KOSPI 1,956 1,680 1,784 1,506 1,105<br />

Taiwan Net purchase of 46 70 11 -881 -679<br />

equities by US buyer buyer buyer seller seller<br />

TWSE 8,935 8,169 8,354 6,596 4,641<br />

Total US<br />

Net purchase of Asian<br />

Equity (US$m)<br />

-6,387 -1,060 -2,334 -12,788 -8,264<br />

US Dow Jones Index 13,522 12,393 12,269 11,257 8,977<br />

US 10-yr bond yield 4.3 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.3<br />

Source: US Treasury<br />

UK Unit Trusts<br />

US$m 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09<br />

61.2 60.8 59.2 58.7 55.9<br />

% of all <strong>Equities</strong> (276.7) (279.6) (251.7) (212.1) (206.7)<br />

17.2 16.7 17.5 19.3 19.4<br />

Funds Bonds (77.9) (76.8) (74.1) (69.9) (71.5)<br />

6.2 6.3 6.1 5.8 6.3<br />

% of Asia (x Japan) (17.2) (17.7) (15.4) (12.4) (13.0)<br />

59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7<br />

Equity Domestic (163.3) (163.9) (145.9) (116.8) (113.4)<br />

34.8 35.1 35.9 39.1 38.8<br />

Funds O<strong>the</strong>rs (96.3) (98.0) (90.4) (82.9) (80.2)<br />

Source: Association of unit Trusts and investment funds.<br />

Notes: Figures in paren<strong>the</strong>ses denote value of funds in pounds bn. 'O<strong>the</strong>rs' Category include<br />

US, Japan, International and emerging markets funds. 1Q'09 data up to Jan only.<br />

Page 34


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Regional Data Monitor<br />

Earnings Monitor<br />

Revisions in Earnings Forecast<br />

Forecast revisions during 1Q09<br />

% Increase % Decrease % Net<br />

Singapore 18 48 -30<br />

Hong Kong 6 46 -40<br />

China 8 36 -28<br />

Msia 12 45 -33<br />

Thailand 38 83 -45<br />

Indonesia 13 23 -10<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of companies’ earnings that were raised (lowered) during 1Q09.<br />

Forecast revisions during 4Q08<br />

% Increase % Decrease % Net<br />

Singapore 17 37 -20<br />

Hong Kong 8 70 -62<br />

China 12 58 -46<br />

Msia 9 100 -91<br />

Thailand 20 80 -59<br />

Indonesia 6 20 -14<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of companies’ earnings that were raised (lowered) during 4Q08.<br />

Revisions in Recommendation<br />

Changes in recommendation during 1Q09<br />

% Up % Down % Net<br />

Singapore 11 18 -7<br />

Hong Kong 6 17 -11<br />

China 8 8 0<br />

Msia 6 12 -6<br />

Thailand 7 25 -18<br />

Indonesia 7 20 -13<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of recommendations that were raised (lowered) during 1Q09.<br />

Changes in recommendation during 4Q08<br />

% Up % Down % Net<br />

Singapore 8 28 -20<br />

Hong Kong 7 30 -23<br />

China 11 22 -11<br />

Msia 6 30 -24<br />

Thailand 13 47 -33<br />

Indonesia 14 34 -20<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of recommendations that were raised (lowered) during 4Q08.<br />

Page 35


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessments & Stock Profiles<br />

Country Assessments<br />

&<br />

Stock Profiles<br />

Page 36


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Singapore<br />

Trading opportunity<br />

STI : 1,584.86<br />

STI 3 / 12 mths Target : 1,800 / 2,150<br />

Expected Return : +14% / +36%<br />

The current bear market rally is being driven by a<br />

normalisation of <strong>the</strong> equity risk premium as global risk<br />

aversion subsides. This presents investors with a near<br />

term trading opportunity. However, until <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

convincing turn in <strong>the</strong> fundamentals, concerns remain<br />

that <strong>the</strong> re-emergence of systemic risk factors could<br />

curtail <strong>the</strong> nascent rebound.<br />

Equity risk premium in normalisation mode as sentiment improves and economy<br />

shows signs of bottoming. Sentiment seems to be improving with bad news well<br />

absorbed by <strong>the</strong> market, as <strong>the</strong> market searches for signs of stability in <strong>the</strong><br />

financial market. Initial signs of <strong>the</strong> economy bottoming out in US and<br />

Singapore will raise investors’ risk appetite. Equity risk premium (ERP) for <strong>the</strong><br />

Singapore market was close to its peak last quarter at 5.5%. A normalizing of<br />

ERP closer to 3% could trigger <strong>the</strong> bear market rally, even as we wait for<br />

confirmation of an eventual recovery in <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

Market bottoms when GDP bottoms – 2Q09 <strong>the</strong> inflexion point? Based on <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Economist’s forecasts, Singapore’s GDP will hit two more extreme negative<br />

quarters – <strong>the</strong> weakest quarter is in 1Q09 -7.8%, –6.9% (2Q09) and –5.2% in<br />

3Q09. We think 2Q09 holds a key inflexion point for a market bottom, and<br />

volatility will persist – we expect a trading range of 1200 to 2000, providing<br />

investors opportunity to accumulate as <strong>the</strong> market weakens.<br />

Narrowing <strong>the</strong> valuation gap to 2100 assuming PE normalizes. At 1585, <strong>the</strong><br />

STI’s PE rises to 10.2x (09F) on earnings decline of 19%. Assuming PE rating<br />

normalizes back to 1 standard deviation of 13.5x, <strong>the</strong> target STI will be 2100.<br />

Our stock picks this quarter are early cyclicals trading on low cycle PE :<br />

SembCorp Marine, City Developments, Venture Manufacturing, OCBC or stocks<br />

trading on bombed out valuation SPH and A REIT.<br />

Janice Chua . (65) 6398 7954 . janicechua@dbsvickers.com<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

sa: TW<br />

Page 37


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Index Close Chng Net -1 mth% -3 mth -6 mth -12 mth 52 week<br />

19 Mar 09 1m (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

STI 1,585 (44) (2.7) (11.7) (38.1) (44.1) 3270 1455<br />

FTSE Mid Cap 310 (23) (6.8) (14.2) (45.4) (56.9) 832 292<br />

FTSE Small Cap 249 (24) (8.9) (16.5) (43.8) (58.6) 698 236<br />

FTSE Financials 367 (20) (5.2) (16.6) (43.1) (49.5) 867 324<br />

FTSE Real Estate 312 (6) (2.0) (18.3) (43.0) (56.1) 842 284<br />

FTSE Re Hold & Dev 319 (1) (0.4) (17.3) (39.0) (54.3) 826 282<br />

FTSE Re Invest Trust 304 (14) (4.3) (19.1) (49.0) (58.7) 877 276<br />

FTSE Oil & Gas 227 (23) (9.1) (7.7) (51.0) (65.9) 829 168<br />

FTSE Basic Materials 179 (25) (12.4) (17.2) (46.8) (64.5) 688 168<br />

FTSE Industrials 328 (5) (1.6) (7.7) (41.6) (50.7) 792 286<br />

FTSE Consumer Goods 354 (14) (3.7) (1.7) (27.9) (44.4) 843 249<br />

FTSE Healthcare 368 (23) (5.8) (6.1) (34.6) (53.7) 868 335<br />

FTSE Consumer Services 452 (21) (4.4) (18.7) (35.7) (40.3) 854 428<br />

FTSE<br />

Telecommunication 604 3 0.5 (3.8) (31.7) (38.0) 1003 493<br />

FTSE Utilities 236 (48) (16.9) (19.2) (46.5) (68.1) 779 217<br />

FTSE Technology 295 (78) (20.8) (18.9) (48.8) (56.7) 810 268<br />

FTSE China 142 (27) (15.9) (25.0) (48.7) (63.7) 517 129<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn) 52<br />

Value (S$bn) 49<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

Initial euphoria gave way to reality. The STI started <strong>the</strong> year<br />

on a positive note, surging 9.3% by <strong>the</strong> second trading day,<br />

led by gains in regional markets on hopes that <strong>the</strong> US<br />

economy will stage a rebound after a dire 2008. However,<br />

worries over possible weak 4Q earnings and global economic<br />

uncertainties continued to plague <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

External factors –weakness in US banks took centrestage. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> US, President Obama’s swearing-in ceremony and <strong>the</strong><br />

US$787bn economic stimulus plan failed to support <strong>the</strong><br />

market. The lack of details on <strong>the</strong> overhaul of <strong>the</strong> banking<br />

system as well as continued weakness in <strong>the</strong> US financial<br />

system added to <strong>the</strong> woes.<br />

Domestically, weak GDP numbers overshadowed a probusiness<br />

budget dished out by <strong>the</strong> government. On <strong>the</strong><br />

economics front, a sharp plunge in January NODX (-35%<br />

yoy), coupled with <strong>the</strong> 16.9% q-o-q drop in 4Q08 GDP led<br />

<strong>the</strong> Singapore government to revise its forecast for<br />

Singapore’s GDP to a range of –2% to –5%. Even a $20.5bn<br />

pro-business budget which focuses on ‘saving jobs-saving<br />

companies’ did not manage to arrest <strong>the</strong> decline of <strong>the</strong> STI,<br />

which was swung by negative newsflow from <strong>the</strong> US.<br />

Corporate scene hit by a barrage of bad news. The corporate<br />

scene was splashed with a barrage of negative news –<br />

ranging from contract cancellations and deferrals in<br />

payments from <strong>the</strong> shipyards, poor earnings with some<br />

slipping into <strong>the</strong> red, and corporate governance issues<br />

erupting among S chips. Banks were <strong>the</strong> key culprit pulling<br />

down <strong>the</strong> market in its final leg of selldown, due to derating<br />

of global financial stocks and growing concerns over<br />

corporate bankruptcies, and rise in NPLs and provision levels.<br />

STI re-test October 2008’s low. The STI hit a low of 1456 in<br />

mid-March , close to 2008’s intra-day low of 1474, before<br />

<strong>the</strong> market staged a rebound to close at 1585 for <strong>the</strong><br />

quarter, down 9% from <strong>the</strong> previous quarter.<br />

Page 38


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Index Key Events<br />

3,900<br />

3,800<br />

3,700<br />

3,600<br />

3,500<br />

3,400<br />

3,300<br />

3,200<br />

3,100<br />

3,000<br />

2,900<br />

2,800<br />

2,700<br />

2,600<br />

2,500<br />

2,400<br />

2,300<br />

2,200<br />

2,100<br />

2,000<br />

1,900<br />

1,800<br />

1,700<br />

1,600<br />

1,500<br />

1,400<br />

Dec-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Liquidity led rally<br />

triggered by<br />

positive news<br />

Feb-07<br />

Led by 9%<br />

fall in China<br />

market<br />

Mar-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

optimism in<br />

property sector,<br />

construction<br />

recovery, RTOs,<br />

small caps<br />

outperform blue<br />

chips<br />

May-07<br />

Jun-07<br />

DC charge<br />

raised from<br />

50% to 70%<br />

Jul-07<br />

Subprime &<br />

credit<br />

market<br />

crisis;<br />

caution<br />

about<br />

property<br />

Aug-07<br />

Fed cut<br />

discount<br />

rate by<br />

50pbs to<br />

5.75%<br />

Sep-07<br />

Led by O&M<br />

and energy<br />

stocks as oil<br />

price and<br />

precious<br />

metals rallied;<br />

S-chips on<br />

QDII<br />

Oct-07<br />

Nov-07<br />

Inflation fears,<br />

more subprime<br />

related write-off<br />

US recession fear,<br />

margin squeezed;<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r write-down<br />

in CDO assets<br />

Speculation of<br />

US rate cut<br />

Dec-07<br />

Surprised 75pbs<br />

rate cut by Fed<br />

to 3.5%<br />

Jan-08<br />

Feb-08<br />

Near-collapse of<br />

Bear Stearns; Fed<br />

cut discount rate<br />

Mar-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Rebound on hopes<br />

that credit crisis has<br />

eased<br />

May-08<br />

US bailout Freddie Mac<br />

and Fannie Mae; fall in<br />

oil prices<br />

Collapse of Fed’s bailout plan,<br />

failure of European banks<br />

Rescue efforts by central banks,<br />

including government guarantee<br />

and ownership of banks<br />

Central banks cut interest rates to boost<br />

bank lending and economic growth<br />

Jun-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Inflation concerns;<br />

slowdown in global<br />

economies; more<br />

financial institutions<br />

collapsed<br />

Sep-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Collapse of Lehman<br />

Bro<strong>the</strong>rs; US bailout AIG<br />

Obama wins<br />

presidency<br />

Nov-08<br />

Optimism about global<br />

rate cuts and stimulus<br />

packgage to revi ve<br />

economy<br />

US banks more<br />

optimistic on outlook<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

US Treasury's<br />

US$1 trn plan<br />

to remove<br />

banks' toxic<br />

assets<br />

Feb-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Our strategy in 1Q09 to stay defensive paid off. Our 1Q09<br />

strategy to stay defensive with preference for companies<br />

with resilient earnings and selling asset plays on strength<br />

worked out well for investors. Top performing sectors were<br />

consumer goods and telecommunications while Real Estate<br />

and REITS were among <strong>the</strong> underperformers.<br />

Worst performing sector were Asset plays (Real Estate and<br />

REITS) on concerns over asset devaluation and refinancing<br />

issues. Property stocks were weighed down by concerns over<br />

potential cash calls, disappointing results, and write down of<br />

<strong>the</strong> value of investment properties. REITS were affected by<br />

refinancing issues and a possible reduction in DPU payout<br />

going forward in light of an increasing challenging operating<br />

environment.<br />

Banks – underperformed due to concerns over <strong>the</strong> quality of<br />

its loan books. This sector was <strong>the</strong> last to fall, resulting in a<br />

final push of <strong>the</strong> index past its Oct 2008 low. Bank stocks<br />

were hit by higher than expected provisions and concerns<br />

over <strong>the</strong> quality of its loan books. Both OCBC and UOB<br />

reported FY08 earnings that were below our expectations.<br />

Going forward, <strong>the</strong> credit cycle is expected to be fragile.<br />

SGX, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, was dragged down by softer<br />

equities markets coupled with continued uncertainties in <strong>the</strong><br />

financial markets.<br />

SPH and SIA a drag on Consumer Services performance. The<br />

key drag on Consumer Services’ performance was <strong>the</strong> sharp<br />

drop in SIA share price due to rapid decline in load factor,<br />

leading to capacity cuts amounting to –14% over <strong>the</strong> past<br />

quarter. Excluding SIA, <strong>the</strong> sector would have performed in<br />

line with <strong>the</strong> broad market. SPH’s share price took a beating<br />

on disappointing results due to <strong>the</strong> drop in Adex revenue,<br />

higher newsprint costs and investment losses.<br />

Rebound in CPO prices lifted consumer stocks- best<br />

performing sector. Consumer Goods, which include<br />

commodity stocks, performed well on <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong><br />

rebound in palm oil prices as <strong>the</strong> fall in inventory levels in<br />

Malaysia. Overall, <strong>the</strong> sector registered positive return of 6%<br />

for <strong>the</strong> month.<br />

Venture – single boost to Technology’s performance. The<br />

performance in Technology sector was boosted by Venture.<br />

Venture gained 8% over <strong>the</strong> past quarter after its FY08<br />

results shows that it continued to execute well in a tough<br />

market, coupled with a bonanza dividend payout despite its<br />

lackluster results.<br />

Page 39


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector Performance (Sorted in Descending Order on 3 months Performance)<br />

Sector 1 Mth Ago (%) 3 Mth Ago (%) 6 Mth Ago (%) 1 yr Ago (%)<br />

Consumer Goods 3 8 -9 -27<br />

Telecommunications 0 -4 -30 -37<br />

Technology -15 -6 -52 -65<br />

Health Care -5 -7 -37 -60<br />

Oil & Gas -11 -8 -57 -68<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage -3 -11 -38 -46<br />

Industrials -4 -12 -45 -53<br />

Basic Materials -12 -14 -49 -68<br />

REITS 0 -15 -44 -55<br />

Financials -7 -16 -45 -45<br />

Consumer Services -5 -17 -32 -34<br />

Real Estate -4 -22 -44 -58<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

GROWTH<br />

4Q08 earnings report card<br />

(S$m) 4Q07 4Q08 4Q08 YoY<br />

% Chng<br />

Basic Material 16 -52 nm<br />

Consumer Goods 599 833 39%<br />

Consumer Services 882 591 -33%<br />

Bank 1,425 772 -46%<br />

Financial 179 66 -63%<br />

Healthcare 39 52 34%<br />

Industrials 1,450 793 -45%<br />

Oil & Gas 195 -62 nm<br />

Real Estate 5,084 -158 nm<br />

Reits 276 322 17%<br />

Technology 86 -134 nm<br />

Telecommunication 98 89 -10%<br />

Total 11,369 3,757 -67%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Earnings cut by sector<br />

(S$m) Bef Result Aft Result % Chng<br />

Sector 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009<br />

Basic Material 77 65 78 52 0% -20%<br />

Consumer<br />

Goods 3,557 2,722 3,501 2,553 -2% -6%<br />

Consumer<br />

Services 2,518 2,402 2,364 1,851 -6% -23%<br />

Bank 6,213 5,836 5,459 4,814 -12% -17%<br />

Financial 524 418 527 419 1% 0%<br />

Healthcare 129 140 139 140 8% 0%<br />

Industrials 5,513 4,697 5,269 4,015 -4% -15%<br />

Oil & Gas 589 602 528 541 -10% -10%<br />

Real Estate 2,913 3,264 2,765 2,698 -5% -17%<br />

Reits 1,224 1,223 1,308 1,203 7% -2%<br />

Technology 275 -21 207 -237 -25% 1037%<br />

Telecom 294 309 312 316 6% 2%<br />

Plunge in 4Q08 earnings – down 67% yoy.<br />

4Q08 was a disaster. Net earnings plunged 67% yoy and<br />

44% qoq, led by financials, industrials and Consumer<br />

Services (mainly SIA and SPH). 39% of companies reported<br />

earnings below our expectations vs 14% above expectations.<br />

Key trends noted in this set of results : a) deterioration in<br />

banks’ loan books leading to higher NPLs and provision levels<br />

b) impairment losses by property companies – which we<br />

estimate at only 10% c) Decline in margins from consumer<br />

companies, specifically China companies due to <strong>the</strong> negative<br />

effects of operating leverage against weaker demand and<br />

higher provisions for doubtful debts d) weak execution on<br />

order book by shipyards including Cosco and Swiber e) forex<br />

losses hit several oil and gas companies again this quarter.<br />

Total 27,503 25,576 26,208 22,325 -5% -13%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Earnings cut by 13% for 2009 – expect decline of 22%<br />

In response to <strong>the</strong> cut in t Singapore’s GDP growth forecast<br />

for 2009 to –4.8% by <strong>DBS</strong> Economist, our team has cut STI’s<br />

EPS growth to –22% for 2009. As expected, <strong>the</strong> biggest<br />

impact came from banks – earnings were cut on assumptions<br />

of higher provisions/NPLs as well as lower fee based income.<br />

SIA’s earnings were significantly affected by its loss-making<br />

cargo business and aggressive cuts in passenger capacity over<br />

Page 40


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

<strong>the</strong> past quarter. Property sector was <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r key sector<br />

which dragged overall growth, on account of developers<br />

pushing back property launches and provisions for doubtful<br />

debts as well as lower ASPs. Including more write-downs in<br />

<strong>the</strong> value of commercial buildings – (we estimate that<br />

landlords had imputed only a 10% cut in <strong>the</strong> value of<br />

commercial buildings vs our expectations of 30%), earnings<br />

decline for 2009 could deteriorate to –30% for 2009. Weak<br />

top line and margins negate <strong>the</strong> positive impact of job credits<br />

and corporate tax cuts from <strong>the</strong> recent budget.<br />

Including asset writedowns, earnings decline would have<br />

been 35% for 2009.<br />

We downgraded earnings for 2009 from +17% growth at<br />

<strong>the</strong> start of 2008 to –22% currently, a swing of 39%.<br />

Including write–downs in <strong>the</strong> value of properties, which will<br />

hit 2009’s earnings, we expect earnings to decline by 35%<br />

this year.<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

Earnings Growth % CAGR PE (x)<br />

2008 2009 2010 08-10 2008 2009 2010<br />

Basic Materials 48.3 32.8 -16.0 5.6 4.4 3.3 3.9<br />

Consumer Goods 81.7 -21.7 11.6 -6.5 7.3 9.3 8.4<br />

Consumer Services -25.6 -22.0 1.4 -11.1 9.8 12.6 12.4<br />

Financials -12.5 -12.5 8.8 -2.4 8.6 9.8 9.0<br />

Health Care 5.9 0.5 8.0 4.2 12.5 12.5 11.5<br />

Industrials 8.1 -23.8 -3.7 -14.4 6.4 8.4 8.7<br />

Oil & Gas -30.4 2.6 6.5 4.5 4.2 4.1 3.8<br />

Real Estate 2.1 -11.4 18.9 2.7 8.3 9.4 7.9<br />

REITS 33.2 -4.4 2.0 -1.2 7.8 8.1 8.0<br />

Technology nm nm nm nm 14.8 nm 42.8<br />

Telecommunications -9.5 -2.8 2.3 -0.3 11.5 11.9 11.6<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage (Bef EI) -0.6 -15.7 7.3 -4.9 8.4 9.9 9.2<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage (Aft EI) -21.5 -16.1 5.2 -6.1 8.4 10.0 9.5<br />

STI <strong>DBS</strong>V Forecast Float Factor Avg -26.8 -19.8 8.1 -6.9 8.2 10.2 9.5<br />

STI Consensus Float Factor Avg -25.7 -19.2 9.4 -6.0 8.3 10.3 9.4<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 41


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

VALUATION<br />

Narrowing <strong>the</strong> valuation gap to 2100 assuming PE<br />

normalizes. At 1585, <strong>the</strong> STI’s PE rises to 10.2x (09F) before<br />

declining to 9.5x (10F). Assuming PE rating normalizes back<br />

to 1 standard deviation of 13.5x, <strong>the</strong> target STI will be 2100.<br />

Price to book at distress levels. Market traded at price to<br />

book of 0.9x to 1.5x during previous recession cycles.<br />

Currently, STI is trading at price to book of close to 0.79x,<br />

which is lower than previous cycles. We note that <strong>the</strong> market<br />

trades within A standard deviation of -1 and –2 during<br />

recession years, implying a trading band of 1696 to 2274 on<br />

<strong>the</strong> STI.<br />

Bear target STI of 1200. Applying 1998’s valuation matrix to<br />

target prices of key component stocks in <strong>the</strong> STI, we arrived<br />

at a target downside of 1200.<br />

How low can dividend yield (09) drop to? The 18% decline in<br />

STI’s DPS in 2009 led to lower dividend yield of 5.6%(08),<br />

declining to 4.5% in 2009(F) based on payout ratio of 47% -<br />

fairly similar to 2008’s payout ratio of 48%. Previous down<br />

cycles saw payouts lowering to 30% to 35% in initial<br />

recovery years, which will translate into dividend yield of<br />

3.4% - back to crisis low levels of 3 to 3.5% in previous<br />

cycles. The recent selldown on dividend payout concerns<br />

could have been discounted by <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

Dividend Payout vs Yield<br />

Forward PE<br />

26.0<br />

24.0<br />

22.0<br />

20.0<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

90 91 92 94 95 96 98 99 00 02 03 04 06 07 09<br />

MSCI Singapore - 12MTH FWD PE RATIO<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

P/BV<br />

2.60<br />

2.40<br />

2.20<br />

2.00<br />

1.80<br />

1.60<br />

1.40<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

6.0%<br />

5.5%<br />

5.0%<br />

4.5%<br />

4.0%<br />

3.5%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.5%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.5%<br />

0.80<br />

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

0%<br />

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

1.0%<br />

Div Payout Ratio (LHS)<br />

Div Yld (RHS)<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 42


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

OUTLOOK<br />

STI and GDP Y-o-Y Growth<br />

Singapore enters its worst recession in history. With<br />

Singapore entering into its worst recession this year,<br />

uncertainties loom. The plunge in exports will hurt<br />

Singapore’s manufacturing and logistics sector. January’s<br />

NODX tumbled 35%, worse than <strong>the</strong> 21 % fall in Dec 2008.<br />

Industrial production slumped 29.1% last month following<br />

<strong>the</strong> 12.8% slide in December 2008. The figure was <strong>the</strong> worst<br />

since <strong>the</strong> data series began in 1984, exceeding <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

record low of 22.3% contraction in September 2001. Over<br />

<strong>the</strong> past six months, <strong>DBS</strong> economist cut Singapore’s GDP<br />

growth for 2009 from +4.6% to –4.8% as of last month.<br />

Exports and manufacturing are expected to return back to<br />

positive growth only by end 2009, on <strong>the</strong> premise of a<br />

pickup in global demand.<br />

STI<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

SARS<br />

Asian Financial Crisis<br />

500<br />

Internet bubble & Sept 11<br />

0<br />

Dec-95<br />

Jun-96<br />

Dec-96<br />

Jun-97<br />

Dec-97<br />

Jun-98<br />

Dec-98<br />

Jun-99<br />

Dec-99<br />

Jun-00<br />

Dec-00<br />

Jun-01<br />

Dec-01<br />

Jun-02<br />

Dec-02<br />

Jun-03<br />

Dec-03<br />

Jun-04<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

GDP (%) STI<br />

Dec-04<br />

Jun-05<br />

Dec-05<br />

1Q09 forecast: -7.8%<br />

Jun-06<br />

Dec-06<br />

Jun-07<br />

Dec-07<br />

Jun-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jun-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

GDP (%)<br />

Worst recession in Singapore's history<br />

% YoY<br />

15<br />

10<br />

GDP growth<br />

Catalysts for a bear market rally<br />

Equity risk premium vs STI<br />

7<br />

5,000<br />

5<br />

6<br />

4,500<br />

0<br />

Mfg recession,<br />

Financial Crisis,<br />

-5<br />

1985/86<br />

1998/99<br />

1964 recession Dot.com bust, 2001<br />

Current downturn<br />

-10<br />

1961 1967 1973 1979 1985 1991 1997 2003 2009<br />

(%)<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

4,000<br />

3,500<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

STI<br />

Volatile market – difficult to catch <strong>the</strong> bottom<br />

The selldown in <strong>the</strong> past quarter has led to valuations<br />

overshooting on <strong>the</strong> downside. We expect <strong>the</strong> market will<br />

remain volatile with <strong>the</strong> murky operating environment and<br />

external risks from <strong>the</strong> U.S and stick to our trading range of<br />

1200 (bear case) and 2150 (base case).<br />

Market bottoms when GDP bottoms – 2Q09 is <strong>the</strong> inflexion<br />

point. Based on <strong>DBS</strong> Economist’s forecasts, Singapore’s GDP<br />

will hit two more extreme negative quarters – <strong>the</strong> weakest<br />

quarter is in -7.8%(1Q09), –6.9% (2Q09) and in –5.2% in<br />

3Q09. The chart below indicates that <strong>the</strong> market plunges<br />

before GDP turns down and struggles to find a bottom when<br />

GDP bottoms. We think 2Q09 holds a key inflexion point for<br />

a market bottom.<br />

-1<br />

1,000<br />

12/98 12/99 12/00 12/01 12/02 12/03 12/04 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09<br />

Source: JCF, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Risk Premium<br />

Early signs of economy bottoming out could lead to<br />

normalizing of equity risk premium<br />

Sentiment seems to be improving over <strong>the</strong> last two weeks.<br />

Bad news is well absorbed by <strong>the</strong> market as <strong>the</strong> market<br />

searches for signs of stability in <strong>the</strong> financial market on <strong>the</strong><br />

back of concerted efforts by governments and central<br />

governments. Initial signs of <strong>the</strong> economy bottoming out in<br />

US and Singapore will raise investors’ risk appetite. Equity<br />

risk premium(ERP) for <strong>the</strong> Singapore market was close to its<br />

peak last quarter, currently hovering at 5.5%. A normalizing<br />

of ERP closer to 3% could trigger <strong>the</strong> long awaited bear<br />

market rally, even as we wait for confirmations of an<br />

eventual recovery in <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

STI<br />

Page 43


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Singapore as SE Asia’s Most Open Economy – could be<br />

among <strong>the</strong> first to rebound. Being <strong>the</strong> most open economy<br />

in SE Asia, Singapore stands to benefit from a recovery in<br />

consumer and business sentiment in <strong>the</strong> US. We believe<br />

that improvements in data points on <strong>the</strong> US economy could<br />

spur an outperformance for <strong>the</strong> STI vs <strong>the</strong> region, as<br />

Singapore companies expect positive follow-through from<br />

<strong>the</strong> improving outlook for <strong>the</strong> US economy.<br />

Smaller decline in Singapore Manufacturing Output in<br />

February An Early Indicator of bottoming out on <strong>the</strong> export<br />

front? Manufacturing output in Singapore fell 22.4% in<br />

February year on-year, due to declining global demand for<br />

pharmaceutical and electronics products. However, this<br />

follows a 29.1% slump in January, and is also a marginally<br />

better result than <strong>the</strong> 23% expected by consensus. In o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, <strong>the</strong> yoy decline has improved and <strong>the</strong> manufacturing<br />

sector is outperforming (albeit very slightly) consensus<br />

expectations. This gels with <strong>the</strong> data points coming in from<br />

<strong>the</strong> US, given <strong>the</strong> extent of Singapore’s manufacturing sector<br />

to global demand. This could be an early indicator that<br />

manufacturing output could have already seen <strong>the</strong> darkest<br />

day and fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement in data points will be ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

catalyst for equities as economic confidence improves.<br />

Potential earnings upgrades for Singapore shipyards.<br />

Earnings for Spore Shipyards could be upgraded in <strong>the</strong> event<br />

order cancellations do not materialize over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months<br />

as we see credit crunch easing for <strong>the</strong> oil/gas sector. The<br />

recovery in oil price could add confidence to oil majors to<br />

place new orders, for production platforms. In addition,<br />

Singapore yards are looking to take over uncompleted<br />

contracts at overseas yards which are in financial difficulties.<br />

This could form <strong>the</strong> base for 2009’s new orders. We are<br />

assuming that SembCorp Marine and Keppel Corp will<br />

secure S$3bn each in <strong>the</strong> 2H09.<br />

Oil Price<br />

Downside Risks for <strong>the</strong> market<br />

On <strong>the</strong> corporate front, key risks which could trigger<br />

downside to <strong>the</strong> market are : 1) cash calls, 2) cuts in dividend<br />

payouts and yields 3)earnings risks and 4)external risks. With<br />

<strong>the</strong> recent rise in market, corporations looking to recapitalise<br />

its balance sheets will be tempted to take <strong>the</strong> opportunity to<br />

beef up its capital base. An example is Raffles Education,<br />

which dished out a private placement of 80m new shares at<br />

0.381cts, raising S$30m for <strong>the</strong> company.<br />

Sucking out liquidity via cash calls. Over <strong>the</strong> past quarter, <strong>the</strong><br />

amount of liquidity sucked from <strong>the</strong> system via cash calls in<br />

Singapore totaled S$7.9bn. We expect fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

recapitalisation and refinancing exercises to put added<br />

pressure on equity markets. The property and REITS sectors,<br />

shipping companies, business trusts are <strong>the</strong> most vulnerable<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> impact of asset devaluation hitting its balance<br />

sheets. As it is, net gearing ratios of property and Reits<br />

sectors are <strong>the</strong> highest at 45% and 58% respectively, which<br />

could rise in <strong>the</strong> event of sharp impairment and revaluation<br />

losses on assets.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r sectors which may require funding are oil and gas<br />

companies, including owners of offshore vessels (Jaya and<br />

Swiber) as well as shipyards in <strong>the</strong> event of defaults in<br />

payments or request for balloon payments instead of<br />

progressive payments. As a result, net gearing in <strong>the</strong><br />

industrial sector is rising from 2% to 16% next year, given<br />

that we expect a drastic drop in deposit payments coupled<br />

with slower progressive payments from clients. We provide a<br />

list of stocks which may require refinancing or recapitalisation<br />

in <strong>the</strong> near future.<br />

We expect an 18% cut in STI’s DPS in 2009, based on a<br />

payout ratio of 47%, fairly similar to 2008’s 48%. This will<br />

yield a lower yield of 4.5% in 2009, compared with 5.6% in<br />

2008.<br />

160<br />

Methanol prices (USD / Ton)<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Jan-03<br />

Jul-03<br />

Jan-04<br />

Jul-04<br />

Jan-05<br />

Jul-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Jul-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Page 44


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Stocks which may require refinancing/recapitalisation<br />

Price/ Net<br />

Mkt Price BV Debt/<br />

Company Cap (S$) (x) Equity<br />

(S$m) 19-Mar Rcmd 09F 08 (x)<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> banking sector to be pressured by writedowns<br />

and provisioning arising from asset devaluation and<br />

corp bankruptcy. Our numbers assume NPLs at 2.4-2.7%<br />

compared to 8% in 1998, while average provision levels are<br />

at 74basis pts, vs avg of 233 pts in 1998.<br />

INDUSTRIALS<br />

China XLX 285 0.29 Fully Valued 0.8x 0.32<br />

Mercator Lines 156 0.13 Fully Valued 0.3x 0.48<br />

SembCorp Industries 3,696 2.07 Hold 1.3x cash<br />

STX Pan Ocean 1,908 9.27 Fully Valued 0.6x 0.05<br />

Tat Hong 303 0.61 Fully Valued 0.7x 0.16<br />

Environmental<br />

Asia Environment 49 0.12 Hold 0.3x 0.25<br />

Hyflux 756 1.44 Buy 2.1x 0.54<br />

Oil and gas<br />

Jaya Hldgs 162 0.21 Fully Valued 0.4x 0.41<br />

Swiber Hldgs 134 0.32 Sell 0.4x 0.73<br />

Banks NPL ratios<br />

%<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

-<br />

FY97<br />

FY98<br />

FY99<br />

FY00<br />

FY01<br />

FY02<br />

FY03<br />

FY04<br />

FY05<br />

FY06<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> UOB OCBC<br />

FY07<br />

FY08<br />

FY09<br />

FY10<br />

Property<br />

Guocoland 905 1.02 Fully Valued 0.5x 1.12<br />

Ho Bee 229 0.31 Fully Valued 0.2x 1.23<br />

Keppel Land 894 1.24 Hold 0.3x 0.52<br />

SC Global 137 0.35 Fully Valued 0.3x 2.84<br />

Reits<br />

CapitaCommercial Trust 1,050 0.75 Hold 0.3x 0.37<br />

CapitaRetail China Trust 409 0.66 Hold 0.5x 0.33<br />

Frasers Commercial Trust 103 0.14 Hold 0.1x 0.56<br />

Suntec REIT 829 0.53 Hold 0.2x 0.35<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Risks to earnings : rise in oil price, asset devaluation, quality<br />

of loan books<br />

The next reporting season which kicked off from April to mid<br />

May will pose challenges for <strong>the</strong> market. With companies<br />

operating in a tough environment in 1Q09, fur<strong>the</strong>r earnings<br />

downgrade is possible. Downside is likely to come from<br />

banks, on rise in non-performing loans once <strong>the</strong> ill effects of<br />

<strong>the</strong> recession and plunge in exports work into <strong>the</strong> real<br />

economy, especially <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Banks Provision charge-off rates<br />

3.5%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.5%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.5%<br />

1.0%<br />

0.5%<br />

0.0%<br />

FY97<br />

Average:<br />

2.33%<br />

FY98<br />

FY99<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

FY00<br />

Average:<br />

0.91%<br />

FY01<br />

FY02<br />

Property stocks will be affected by fur<strong>the</strong>r asset writedowns.<br />

Rise in oil price raises risks to earnings of transport<br />

companies. SIA is suffering from weak load factor. In Feb<br />

2009, load factor plunged below 70% vs our assumption of<br />

75%. The rise in oil price to US$53/bbl, if it continues above<br />

US$60/bbl, will lead to downgrades, including land transport<br />

companies SMRT and Comfort Delgro.<br />

FY03<br />

FY04<br />

FY05<br />

FY06<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> UOB OCBC<br />

FY07<br />

FY08<br />

FY09<br />

FY10<br />

Page 45


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

STRATEGY<br />

Accumulate early cyclicals trading on low cycle PE<br />

Cyclicals have been sold down in <strong>the</strong> previous quarter and<br />

offer value buys compared to defensive stocks, which are<br />

trading at a premium to <strong>the</strong> market. With <strong>the</strong> possibility of a<br />

lowering of equity risk premium, we recommend investors<br />

accumulate early cyclicals trading on low cycle PE and beta<br />

plays.<br />

Upgraded early cyclicals – oil and gas to overweight,<br />

Technology, Real estate, and Commodity plays to Neutral.<br />

We have upgraded Oil and Gas to Overweight, on <strong>the</strong> back<br />

of <strong>the</strong> rebound in oil prices to US$53/bbl, and potential<br />

earnings upgrades as <strong>the</strong> prospect of order cancellations<br />

reduces in line with easier credit. We have also upgraded<br />

commodity plays, Real Estate and technology sectors to<br />

Neutral on valuation grounds. We cut Telecoms from Neutral<br />

to Underweight as we are bearish on Singtel due to potential<br />

weakness in earnings from Bharti(India) and currency<br />

volatility, and <strong>the</strong> threat of a cut in dividend payout.<br />

Our stock picks this quarter are mainly cyclicals trading on<br />

low cycle PE or stocks trading on bombed out valuation. The<br />

list of stocks are sorted by beta.<br />

Our large cap stock picks are :<br />

SembCorp Marine (BUY, TP $1.88) which will ride on <strong>the</strong><br />

rebound in oil prices, has <strong>the</strong> highest beta and with potential<br />

for earnings upgrade with reduced risks of order<br />

cancellations due to credit crunch easing for oil and gas<br />

sector. Stock is trading on historical low PE (lower than<br />

regional crisis) and with an attractive dividend yield of<br />

6.3%.<br />

OCBC(BUY, TP $5.70) which has <strong>the</strong> highest Tier 1 capital in<br />

Singapore and <strong>the</strong> region, and trading on bombed out<br />

valuations after <strong>the</strong> recent selldown with attractive dividend<br />

yield.<br />

City Developments (BUY, TP $5.68) trading on trough<br />

valuations and is <strong>the</strong> best Singapore Property proxy, backed<br />

by a strong balance sheet and minimal downside to book<br />

value.<br />

SPH (BUY, TP $2.93) is trading at its lowest price to book of<br />

1.8x over <strong>the</strong> past 20 years. It is a beneficiary of<br />

government’s job credits dished out in recent budget and its<br />

strong balance sheet, monopoly position will ride it through<br />

this crisis. Dividend yield is attractive at >8% despite a<br />

reduced dividend payout assumption of 74%.<br />

Venture Manufacturing (BUY, TP $6.00) – An early cyclical<br />

play with proven track record, this stock is well managed and<br />

has a strong balance sheet to ride it through this down cycle.<br />

Stock offers low cycle PE and attractive dividend yield of<br />

11%.<br />

Ascendas REIT (BUY, TP $1.51). Its balance sheet has been<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>ned with <strong>the</strong> recent placement, <strong>the</strong> stock offers<br />

stability with 43% of its income locked in Long term lease.<br />

Page 46


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Stock picks<br />

Price/<br />

Net<br />

Mkt Price Target BV Debt/<br />

Cap (S$) Price % EPS Gth (%) PE (x) (x) Div Yld (%) Equity<br />

Company (S$m) 19-Mar (S$) Upside Rcmd 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 08A 09F 08E (x) Beta<br />

Large Cap (mkt cap >S$1bn)<br />

SembCorp Marine 3,086 1.49 1.88 26% Buy -3% 11% 6.7x 6.0x 1.9x 6.3% 5.2% cash 1.51<br />

City Development 4,556 5.01 5.68 13% Buy -2% 8% 8.3x 7.7x 0.8x 1.5% 1.0% 0.62 1.16<br />

Venture Corporation 1,294 4.72 6.00 27% Buy 10% 6% 7.1x 6.7x 0.7x 10.6% 10.6% cash 1.13<br />

Ascendas REIT 1,930 1.15 1.51 31% Buy 8% -14% 8.1x 9.4x 0.6x 0.0% 13.0% 38.3% 1.10<br />

Wheelock Properties 1,077 0.90 1.24 38% Buy -29% 68% 7.2x 4.3x 0.5x 6.7% 9.8% cash 0.96<br />

OCBC Bank 14,163 4.53 5.70 26% Buy -8% 11% 10.2x 9.2x 0.9x 6.2% 4.5% cash 0.90<br />

SIA Engineering 1,725 1.60 2.10 31% Buy -5% -16% 7.1x 8.5x 1.5x 12.5% 11.9% cash 0.64<br />

SPH 3,964 2.49 2.93 18% Buy -8% -8% 9.2x 10.1x 1.9x 11.0% 8.0% cash 0.54<br />

Mid/Small Cap (mkt cap


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banks & Finance<br />

Neutral<br />

Consumer Goods<br />

Neutral<br />

Some positive signs expected to emerge in 2Q09. We remain neutral on Singapore<br />

banks although with a positive bias. While outlook for 2009 remains murky for<br />

banks, from our visits with <strong>the</strong> banks recently, we ga<strong>the</strong>r signals that things are not<br />

too bad. Positively, with banks incorporating risk into lending yields, as such, we<br />

expect NIMs to hold up if not improve y-o-y. We also believe government measures<br />

initiated would lend support to loan growth. However, we do expect asset quality<br />

to deteriorate into 2009. We have forecasted NPL ratio ranging from 2.4-2.7% for<br />

2009 and looking at higher provision charge-off rates averaging 74bps for 2009.<br />

We believe NPLs would arise more from <strong>the</strong> corporate-SME segment ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

consumers. We still do not think NPL ratios and charge-off rates will balloon up to<br />

<strong>the</strong> levels attained during <strong>the</strong> Asian crisis, although possibly near <strong>the</strong> SARS period.<br />

Banks are on a much stronger footing today coupled with more prudent risk<br />

management practices. In addition, we believe corporates are also operating on<br />

much lower gearing ratios and healthier interest cover ratios compared to <strong>the</strong> crisis<br />

period. Our preferred pick for OCBC (Buy, TP S$5.70) remains as we favour OCBC's<br />

strong Tier-1 CAR at 14.9%, sustainable absolute dividends and minimal risk for<br />

equity call. Key risk to our call for sector would be a protracted global recession,<br />

which could potentially see banks testing lower BV multiples experienced during <strong>the</strong><br />

Asian crisis.<br />

We recently raised our 09F, 10F, and 11F CPO prices by 25%, 17% and 12% to<br />

RM1,900, RM2,000 and RM2,200, respectively due to <strong>the</strong> effects of drought in<br />

South America. However, most plantation stocks have more than priced this in and<br />

we see downside potential in <strong>the</strong> near term, as CPO production volume rebounds<br />

and exports slow down. When that happens, we recommend investors to pick up on<br />

dips. Our top picks are Indofood Agri and First Resources, which are trading below<br />

peer’s historical low-cycle PE, despite sound fundamentals. We see near term<br />

correction for Wilmar on account of recent bull-run, higher soybean production<br />

outlook, flat edible oil demand and Chinese government’s reserve build up.<br />

For downstream consumer goods, we maintain our view that consumer discretionary<br />

spending will likely contract with negative/slowing GDP growth. In terms of<br />

consumer staples, whilst we believe demand for consumer staples will continue to<br />

remain resilient especially in <strong>the</strong> PRC, <strong>the</strong> recent spate of negative developments for<br />

s-chips will depress investor sentiment for <strong>the</strong> such counters. Recent developments<br />

for S-chips relates to accounting irregularities (Fibrechem), fraud (Oriental Century),<br />

pledging of shares by owner/major shareholder (Sino-Environment, Beauty China),<br />

high capex spent in <strong>the</strong> face of upcoming CB cash call (Celestial NutriFoods) and<br />

absent of dividends despite high cash level (China Hongxing).<br />

OCBC<br />

Indofood Agri, First<br />

Resources<br />

Page 48


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Consumer Services<br />

Overweight<br />

Industrials<br />

Underweight<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Overweight<br />

We maintain our overweight recommendation on Consumer services. Our top pick<br />

for this sector is SPH which we believe has priced in <strong>the</strong> weak economic outlook,<br />

falling ad revenues and mitigated by recently announced wage cuts. Counter is<br />

trading at an attractive 1.9x P/B. The last time it was this low was in 1998 at 1.95x<br />

P/B. For transport providers, we expect public transport ridership to remain firm in<br />

<strong>the</strong> downturn, albeit to retreat from ridership growth of >10% in 2008. While both<br />

(SMRT and ComfortDelGro) are trading at relatively high valuations, we prefer<br />

ComfortDelGro given its proven track record in <strong>the</strong> international arena. For SIA,<br />

given <strong>the</strong> steep fall in load factors in Feb by 7.1ppt to 69.7%, we believe investors<br />

are likely to remain cautious on SIA until <strong>the</strong>y can see signs of improvement in<br />

carriage and esp. load factors.<br />

The Industrials sector is expected to be dragged down by weakness in Chinese<br />

shipyards and dry bulk shipping. The dry bulk shipping will be affected by<br />

weakening freight rates, due to: 1) A more inverted freight futures curve now (vs.<br />

early 2009), 2) An unhealthy accumulation of iron ore inventory in China back to<br />

early December 2008 level, and 3) Drop in steel output in China. The expected fall<br />

in freight rates reinforce our view that <strong>the</strong> orders cancellation for Chinese shipyards<br />

would correspondingly pick up momentum in 2Q09, vs. delivery delay news that<br />

dominate <strong>the</strong> shipbuilding industry since 4Q08. As such, our picks for this sector is<br />

SembCorp Marine [BUY, S$1.88], a world class rig builder, and Hyflux [BUY,<br />

S$1.96], an integrated water and liquid treatment company specializing in<br />

membrane technologies.<br />

We remain contrarian with a POSITIVE rating on <strong>the</strong> Oil and Gas Sector. This is<br />

backed by <strong>the</strong> strong 2009 capex commitment to-date by oil majors (-1%) and<br />

national oil companies (+30%). We expect <strong>the</strong> overall AHTS to offshore drilling rig<br />

ratio to be at higher end of <strong>the</strong> 2.3-2.6x in <strong>the</strong> 2004-08 boom periods, as reflected<br />

in our scenario analyses for various water depths. These ratios may improve, given<br />

our view that <strong>the</strong> probability of cancellations for AHTS would pick up momentum<br />

by 4Q09, while <strong>the</strong> cancellation risk for offshore drilling rigs will drop after mid-<br />

2009. We also expect <strong>the</strong> worst of oil demand destruction to be behind us, as oil<br />

prices find support from a possible 1.2%-2.2% supply deficit as a percentage of<br />

estimated demand for 2009. Our top pick in this sector is Ezra Holding [BUY,<br />

S$1.19].<br />

SPH<br />

SembCorp Marine, Hyflux,<br />

SIA Engg<br />

Ezra Holding<br />

Page 49


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Property<br />

Neutral<br />

Reits<br />

Neutral<br />

Technology<br />

Neutral<br />

Telecom<br />

Underweight<br />

We are upgrading our call on developers to Neutral. The sector continued to<br />

underperform in 1Q09, reflecting our earlier cautious call, as a result of weaker<br />

FY08 earnings and <strong>the</strong> commencement of asset writedowns. On a qoq basis, lower<br />

valuations in 1Q09 relative to 4Q08 means even more bad news has now been<br />

priced in. Sentiment in <strong>the</strong> physical market should continue to be affected by<br />

negative macro newsflow like employment and economic data. On <strong>the</strong> equities<br />

market though, we believe that developers may start to perform in line with <strong>the</strong><br />

market even though positive catalysts within <strong>the</strong> physical market will continue to be<br />

lacking. In addition, rotational interest into beta plays could benefit <strong>the</strong> real estate<br />

developers. In terms of stock selection, we had devised a balance sheet scorecard<br />

(see sector report on 19 Mar 09) as we believe that balance sheet strength will be<br />

<strong>the</strong> armour that will shield developers through this downcycle. Based on this, any<br />

accumulation of property beta plays should continue to be focused on companies<br />

with a strong balance sheet (like City Dev, Wheelock, Wing Tai), as we look forward<br />

past <strong>the</strong> impending bottom to identify <strong>the</strong> survivors for <strong>the</strong> medium-term. Highlygeared<br />

companies like SC Global, Ho Bee and Guocoland scored poorly on our<br />

scorecard and should still be avoided for now.<br />

We maintain our NEUTRAL stance on <strong>the</strong> S-reits sector. S-reits are currently trading<br />

at an average 0.4 x P/BV and offering a yield of 15%, which in our view, is pricing<br />

in a certain degree of recapitalization prospects in <strong>the</strong> face of an asset deflation<br />

environment. These issues is likely to continue being <strong>the</strong> key overriding concerns to<br />

share price performance for <strong>the</strong> sector in <strong>the</strong> immediate term. Catalyst and data<br />

points to look out for in a re-rating, will likely hinge through S-reits addressing<br />

<strong>the</strong>se capital costs issues and <strong>the</strong> loosening of <strong>the</strong> current tight credit environment.<br />

Our choice in <strong>the</strong> sector remains <strong>the</strong> S-reits with stronger balance sheet with little<br />

short term refinancing and recapitalization requirements. We recommend A-REIT,<br />

Frasers Centerpoint Trust and Parkway Life Reit.<br />

We have upgraded our Tech sector view to Neutral from underweight as we noted<br />

tentative signs that demand decline is easing, if not stabilizing. Our checks with<br />

companies indicated some incremental orders bouncing off January lows, which we<br />

believe was a result of restocking following sharp inventory correction in Nov/Dec<br />

but not a real pick up in end demand yet. In fact, companies continue to see<br />

challenging outlook for <strong>the</strong> rest of 2009 in general. Notwithstanding, we believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> volume improvement sequentially, although still negative YoY, would boost<br />

sentiment in <strong>the</strong> near term. However, we will stick to Venture and Hi-P, which we<br />

think have dominant market positions to survive and emerge stronger from <strong>the</strong><br />

downturn, backed by strong cashflows, a flexible cost structure and a healthy<br />

balance sheet.<br />

Resilient earnings of <strong>the</strong> telecom sector are already reflected in valuations in our<br />

view. The sector trades at 12.2x FY09 PER and 11.9x FY10 PER compared to<br />

broader market at 10.6x and 9.9x respectively. Potential dividend yield of <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

is 5.4% for FY09 compared to broader market’s 4.5%. We downgrade <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

from neutral to underweight due to our bearish view on SingTel, as market could<br />

be potentially disappointed with <strong>the</strong> performance of its Indian associate Bharti in<br />

upcoming set of results, due to irrational competition in India. We prefer StarHub to<br />

M1 on valuation grounds and sustainable 9% yield, payable on quarterly basis. in<br />

our view, StarHub deserves at least 20% premium over M1 in terms of PER and<br />

EV/EBITDA to reflect its better track record and fundamentals.<br />

City Devt, Wheelock<br />

A-REIT, Frasers Centerpoint<br />

Trust and Parkway Life Reit<br />

Venture, Hi-P<br />

Starhub<br />

Page 50


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

This page has been left blank intentionally<br />

Page 51


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Ascendas REIT<br />

Bloomberg: AREIT SP | Reuters: AEMN.SI<br />

BUY S$1.15 STI : 1,584.86<br />

Price Target: 12-Month S$ 1.51<br />

Potential Catalyst: Improving Singapore economic data<br />

Analyst<br />

Derek Tan +65 6398 7966<br />

derektan@dbsvickers.com<br />

Sitting steady<br />

Ascendas REIT (A-REIT) sits pretty well amongst its S-reit<br />

peers post raising S$408m through a private placement<br />

and preferential offering in <strong>the</strong> beginning of FY09. With<br />

improved financial flexibility and a streng<strong>the</strong>ned balance<br />

sheet, we believe that A-REIT stands relatively clear of<br />

any potential re-financing/ re-capitalization concerns<br />

currently overhanging <strong>the</strong> S-reit sector. Maintain BUY,<br />

TP S$1.51.<br />

Price Relative<br />

S$<br />

3.50<br />

3.00<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

Relative Index<br />

204<br />

184<br />

164<br />

144<br />

124<br />

Improved financial metrics. Gearing ratio improved to<br />

33% currently (increasing to c37% with inclusion of its<br />

development properties), which is one of <strong>the</strong> lowest<br />

amongst <strong>the</strong> S-reits peers, with little major short-term<br />

re-financing requirements. Interest cover should remain<br />

healthy at c 4.2x over <strong>the</strong> next 2 financial years.<br />

1.50<br />

1.00<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Ascendas REIT (LHS) R e la tive ST I IN D E X (R H S)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Mar (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Gross Revenue 322 378 382 389<br />

Net Property Inc 243 286 289 294<br />

Total Return 669 197 192 192<br />

Distribution Inc 187 212 206 208<br />

EPU (S cts) 13.2 14.2 12.2 11.2<br />

EPU Gth (%) 15 8 (14) (8)<br />

DPU (S cts) 14.1 15.0 12.1 12.2<br />

DPU Gth (%) 11 6 (19) 1<br />

NAV per shr (S cts) 184.3 165.7 164.9 162.7<br />

PE (X) 8.7 8.1 9.4 10.2<br />

Distribution Yield (%) 12.3 13.0 10.5 10.6<br />

P/NAV (x) 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7<br />

Aggregate Leverage (%) 38.3 37.9 37.2 37.7<br />

ROAE (%) 7.9 7.5 6.8 6.9<br />

104<br />

84<br />

64<br />

43% of income secured on LT basis. AREIT’s income<br />

stream is estimated to remain relatively stable, in <strong>the</strong><br />

coming two financial years as 43% of it is locked in on a<br />

long-term basis (from its sale and lease back (SLB)<br />

properties). Our forward FY10-11F DPU estimates of<br />

12.1 –12.2 Scts reflect a 10-20% drop in rents coupled<br />

with a 15% drop in occupancy for its multi-tenanted<br />

(MTB) buildings.<br />

Stable DPU 10.5% yield. We remain confident of A-<br />

REIT’s ability to maintain a FY10-11F DPU yield of<br />

10.5% through <strong>the</strong> current recession. Potential softness<br />

in operational performance should be offset somewhat<br />

from <strong>the</strong> progressive addition of its development<br />

properties worth S$233.6m. Maintain BUY with a TP of<br />

S$1.51 based on DCF.<br />

Distn. Inc Chng (%): - - -<br />

Consensus DPU (S cts): 14.9 13.4 13.3<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Real Estate Investment Trust<br />

Principal Business: AREIT's portfolio focussed on business space and<br />

industrial properties.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,679<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 1,930 / 1,277<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Ascendas Pte Ltd (%) 21.5<br />

Fidelity Management (%) 5.2<br />

Free Float (%) 73.3<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 5,916<br />

Page 52<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Ascendas REIT<br />

Statement of Total Return (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Gross revenue 322 378 382 389 Investment Properties 4,174 4,596 4,736 4,736<br />

Property expenses (79) (92) (93) (95) O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 6 15 24 33<br />

Net Property Income 243 286 289 294 Cash & ST Invts 5 138 1 4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating expenses (28) (34) (38) (41) Inventory 0 0 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 14 16 17 17<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (40) (55) (60) (61) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 6 6 6 6<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Total Assets 4,205 4,771 4,784 4,796<br />

Net Income 175 197 192 192<br />

Tax 0 0 0 0 ST Debt 236 366 391 416<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liabilities 177 206 208 212<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 LT Debt 1,324 1,341 1,341 1,341<br />

Net Income After Tax 175 197 192 192 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 30 30 30 30<br />

Total Return 669 197 192 192 Unit holders’ funds 2,438 2,828 2,813 2,798<br />

Non-tax deductible Items 12 15 15 16 Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Inc available for Dist. 187 212 206 208 Total Funds & Liabilities 4,205 4,771 4,784 4,796<br />

Revenue Gth (%) 13.9 17.4 1.1 1.6 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (157) (184) (186) (189)<br />

N Property Inc Gth (%) 15.8 17.5 1.1 1.6 Net Cash/(Debt) (1,554) (1,569) (1,731) (1,753)<br />

Net Inc Gth (%) 17.9 12.4 (2.7) 0.4<br />

Dist. Payout Ratio (%) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Income 175 197 192 192 Net Prop Inc Margins (%) 75.6 75.6 75.6 75.6<br />

Dep. & Amort. 1 1 1 1 Net Income Margins (%) 54.3 52.0 50.1 49.5<br />

Tax Paid 0 0 0 0 Dist to revenue (%) 58.1 56.0 53.9 53.6<br />

Associates &JV Inc/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Managers & Trustee’s fees 8.7 9.1 9.9 10.5<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (4) 27 2 3 to sales (%)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 53 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 7.9 7.5 6.8 6.9<br />

Net Operating CF 225 224 195 196 ROA (%) 4.7 4.4 4.0 4.0<br />

Net Invt in Properties 0 (10) (10) (10) ROCE (%) 6.0 5.9 5.5 5.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts (net) (249) (422) (141) 0 Int. Cover (x) 5.3 4.6 4.2 4.2<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Current Ratio (x) 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0<br />

Div from Assoc. & JVs 0 0 0 0 Quick ratio (x) 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF (129) 0 0 0 Aggregate Leverage (%) 38.3 37.9 37.2 37.7<br />

Net Investing CF (378) (432) (151) (10) Z-Score (X) NA 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />

Distribution Paid (181) (212) (206) (208) Operating CFPS (S cts) 17.3 14.3 12.2 11.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 334 147 25 25 Free CFPS (S cts) 17.0 15.5 11.7 10.9<br />

New units issued 0 405 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Financing CF 154 340 (181) (183)<br />

Net Cashflow 1 132 (137) 3<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

P/BV<br />

FY Mar 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 3Q2009 (x)<br />

Gross revenue 84 93 97 102<br />

Property expenses (21) (23) (25) (28) 1.90<br />

Net Property Income 64 70 73 74<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating expenses<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc<br />

(14)<br />

(8)<br />

(7)<br />

(13)<br />

(7)<br />

(15)<br />

(6)<br />

(16)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1.60<br />

1.30<br />

Net Income 42 50 51 52<br />

Tax 0 0 0 0 1.00<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Income after Tax 42 50 51 52 0.70<br />

Total Return 536 50 51 52<br />

Non-tax deductible Items 7 2 2 2 0.40<br />

Net Inc available for Dist. 49 52 53 54<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Revenue Gth (%) 5 10 5 5<br />

N Property Inc Gth (%) 4 9 4 2<br />

Net Inc Gth (%) (8) 18 3 2<br />

Net Prop Inc Margin (%) 75.7 75.3 74.6 72.5<br />

Dist. Payout Ratio (%) 100.0 100.0 100.0 200.0<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 53


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

City Developments<br />

Bloomberg: CIT SP | Reuters: CTDM.SI<br />

BUY S$5.01 STI : 1,584.86<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 5.68<br />

Potential Catalyst: Pick-up in property market sentiment<br />

Analyst<br />

Adrian Chua +65 6398 7961<br />

adrianchua@dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

19.70<br />

17.70<br />

15.70<br />

13.70<br />

11.70<br />

9.70<br />

7.70<br />

5.70<br />

3.70<br />

S$<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

City Developm ent (LHS) R ela tive STI IN D E X (R H S)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 3,106 2,945 2,317 2,354<br />

EBITDA 1,135 1,043 970 1,005<br />

Pre-tax Profit 955 834 778 845<br />

Net Profit 712 568 544 593<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 686 560 544 593<br />

EPS (S cts) 78.3 62.5 59.9 65.2<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 75.4 61.6 59.9 65.2<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 268 (18) (3) 9<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 74.6 59.5 57.0 62.2<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 28.2 7.5 4.8 5.2<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 571.7 597.1 649.5 709.9<br />

PE (X) 6.4 8.0 8.4 7.7<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 6.6 8.1 8.4 7.7<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 8.1 8.1 7.3 6.9<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 8.4 9.1 9.2 8.3<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 5.6 1.5 1.0 1.0<br />

P/Book Value (X) 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 14.3 10.7 9.6 9.6<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 53.8 56.0<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Real Estate<br />

Principal Business: Principal activities are those of property<br />

developer and owner and hotel owner and operator.<br />

217<br />

197<br />

177<br />

157<br />

137<br />

117<br />

97<br />

77<br />

Singapore property proxy<br />

City Dev is trading close to trough valuations of 0.64x<br />

P/BV, and well below its long-term average of 2.1x P/BV.<br />

Given its conservative accounting policy for valuation of<br />

investment properties, downside to book value is limited.<br />

Earnings resilience and a strong balance sheet make this<br />

our top big-cap pick among <strong>the</strong> Singapore developers.<br />

Largest Listed Landbank Owner in Singapore.<br />

Among listed Singapore developers, City Dev has <strong>the</strong><br />

largest residential landbank in Singapore across a variety<br />

of market segments, allowing it to take advantage of any<br />

pick-up in market sentiment.<br />

Trading Below Book. City Dev is also trading at 0.84x<br />

P/BV. This is significantly below its long-term average of<br />

2.1x P/BV, and close to its trough of 0.64x P/BV during<br />

both <strong>the</strong> 1998 and 2003 downturns.<br />

Limited Downside to Book Value. City Dev’s<br />

traditionally conservative policy of accounting for its<br />

investment portfolio at cost means writedowns on <strong>the</strong>se<br />

valuations are likely to be limited. A scenario analysis of a<br />

potential writedown on its development landbank pegs<br />

this at around 14 cents per share, or 2% of its current<br />

book value.<br />

Strong Balance Sheet. CDL’s balance sheet remains<br />

healthy, with gearing at 0.5x, stronger than <strong>the</strong> 0.7x in<br />

FY97 at <strong>the</strong> start of <strong>the</strong> Asian Financial Crisis downcycle.<br />

Interest cover is at a robust 11x. If CDL adopted a<br />

revaluation policy, gearing would be 0.3x. We continue<br />

to like City Dev for its earnings resilience, balance sheet<br />

strength and good management track record. Our TP of<br />

S$5.68 is based on a 25% discount to its fair value<br />

(RNAV) of S$7.58.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 909<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 4,556 / 3,013<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Hong Leong Holdings (%) 16.4<br />

Hong Leong Investment (%) 15.4<br />

Aberdeen Asset Management 12.0<br />

Free Float (%) 56.2<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 3,148<br />

Page 54<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

City Developments<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 3,106 2,945 2,317 2,354 Net Fixed Assets 4,258 4,162 4,179 4,197<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (1,478) (1,271) (735) (738) Invts in Associates & JVs 831 1,043 1,041 1,050<br />

Gross Profit 1,628 1,674 1,582 1,616 Invt & Devt Properties 2,468 2,313 2,313 2,313<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (890) (894) (792) (805) O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 215 181 234 286<br />

Operating Profit 738 780 790 812 Cash & ST Invts 779 796 1,443 2,110<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc (26) (8) 9 12 Dev Props held for sale 2,578 2,920 2,703 2,608<br />

Associates & JV Inc 287 139 47 57 Inventory 15 11 6 7<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (70) (85) (67) (36) Debtors 1,075 1,099 864 878<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 26 8 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 955 834 778 845 Total Assets 12,219 12,524 12,783 13,448<br />

Tax (65) (152) (124) (134)<br />

Minority Interest (164) (101) (97) (105) ST Debt 796 860 860 860<br />

Preference Dividend (13) (13) (13) (13) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 728 830 517 527<br />

Net Profit 712 568 544 593 LT Debt 3,235 3,287 3,287 3,287<br />

Net Profit before Except. 686 560 544 593 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 542 525 525 525<br />

EBITDA 1,135 1,043 970 1,005 Shareholder’s Equity 5,199 5,430 5,906 6,455<br />

Minority Interests 1,718 1,593 1,689 1,794<br />

Sales Gth (%) 22.0 (5.2) (21.3) 1.6 Total Cap. & Liab. 12,219 12,524 12,783 13,448<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 43.1 (8.1) (7.0) 3.6<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 45.4 5.6 1.3 2.8 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 2,939 3,200 3,057 2,965<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 110.2 (20.2) (4.2) 9.0 Net Cash/(Debt) (3,253) (3,351) (2,704) (2,037)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 6.9 18.2 16.0 15.8<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 955 834 778 845 Gross Margins (%) 52.4 56.8 68.3 68.7<br />

Dep. & Amort. 136 132 124 124 Opg Profit Margin (%) 23.8 26.5 34.1 34.5<br />

Tax Paid (98) (79) (167) (124) Net Profit Margin (%) 22.9 19.3 23.5 25.2<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (287) (139) (47) (57) ROAE (%) 14.3 10.7 9.6 9.6<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (647) (312) 186 83 ROA (%) 6.1 4.6 4.3 4.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 202 12 0 0 ROCE (%) 6.3 5.5 5.5 5.4<br />

Net Operating CF 260 448 875 870 Div Payout Ratio (%) 36.0 12.0 8.0 8.0<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (496) (279) (142) (142) Net Interest Cover (x) 10.5 9.2 11.7 22.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (31) 19 (52) (52) Asset Turnover (x) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (183) (49) 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 104.6 134.7 154.6 135.1<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 67 67 48 48 Creditors Turn (avg days) 157.4 196.4 302.3 221.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 47 6 0 0 Current Ratio (x) 2.9 2.9 3.6 4.0<br />

Net Investing CF (596) (237) (146) (146) Quick Ratio (x) 1.2 1.1 1.7 2.2<br />

Div Paid (260) (236) (81) (56) Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 725 158 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 12.3 6.7 3.4 3.4<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Z-Score (X) 2.2 1.6 1.7 1.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (194) (69) 0 0 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) (357.7) (368.5) (297.4) (224.0)<br />

Net Financing CF 271 (147) (81) (56) Opg CFPS (S cts) 99.8 83.6 75.7 86.6<br />

Net Cashflow (65) 64 647 667 Free CFPS (S cts) (25.9) 18.5 80.6 80.1<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m) RNAV Estimates (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008<br />

Turnover 759 781 688 718 Estimated Valuation of Investment Properties 4,123.6<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (333) (338) (285) (315) Less: FY08 Book Value of Investment Properties (2,312.7)<br />

Gross Profit 426 443 403 402 Surplus/(Deficit) (1) 1,811.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (233) (220) (240) (201)<br />

Operating Profit 193 223 162 201 NPV Surplus of Development Properties (2) 1,732.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 1 3 3 (15)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 60 41 34 3 Market Valuation of listed subsidiaries 736.4<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (17) (18) (27) (23) Less: Book Value (as of FY08) (2,481.3)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (4) (1) 48 (35) Surplus/(Deficit) (3) (1,745.0)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 232 249 221 132<br />

Tax (42) (47) (49) (14) Surplus from commercial projects (4) 218.4<br />

Minority Interest (25) (37) (21) (17)<br />

Net Profit 165 165 151 100 Book Shareholder's Equity (6) 5,429.7<br />

Net profit bef Except. 169 166 103 135<br />

EBITDA 287 301 232 222 Less: Outflow on preference share conversion (7) (211.8)<br />

Sales Gth (%) (0.9) 2.9 (11.9) 4.3 RNAV (1+2+3+4+5+6+7) 7,234.4<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (8.8) 4.8 (22.9) (4.1) Fully Diluted Share base (m) 954.3<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (18.0) 15.9 (27.3) 24.0<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (29.8) 0.1 (8.7) (33.7) RNAV per share ($) 7.58<br />

Gross Margins (%) 56.1 56.8 58.5 56.0 Premium/(Discount) -25%<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 25.4 28.6 23.6 28.1<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 21.7 21.2 21.9 13.9 Target Price (S$) 5.68<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 55


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

OCBC<br />

Bloomberg: OCBC SP | Reuters: OCBC.SI<br />

BUY S$4.53 STI : 1,584.86<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 5.70<br />

Potential Catalyst: Upside from GEH contribution coupled with lower<br />

than expected provisions<br />

Analyst<br />

Sue Lin Lim +603 2711 0971<br />

suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

“Recipients of this report, received from <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Singapore) Pte Ltd (“<strong>DBS</strong>VR”), are to contact <strong>DBS</strong>VR at +65 6398 7954<br />

in respect of any matters arising from or in connection with this report.”<br />

Price Relative<br />

10.60<br />

9.60<br />

8.60<br />

7.60<br />

6.60<br />

5.60<br />

4.60<br />

3.60<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

OCBC (LHS) Relative STI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 2,341 2,280 2,484 2,569<br />

Net Profit 1,749 1,365 1,511 1,588<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,486 1,365 1,511 1,588<br />

EPS (S cts) 56.7 44.3 49.0 51.5<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 48.2 44.3 49.0 51.5<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (21) (8) 11 5<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 56.7 44.3 49.0 51.5<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 9.4 10.2 9.2 8.8<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 27.9 20.4 22.6 23.7<br />

Div Yield (%) 6.2 4.5 5.0 5.2<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 10.3 9.5 10.0 10.0<br />

ROAE (%) 12.2 9.5 10.0 10.0<br />

ROA (%) 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 453 477 504 532<br />

P/Book Value (x) 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9<br />

219<br />

199<br />

179<br />

159<br />

139<br />

119<br />

99<br />

79<br />

Sing-Malay bank proxy<br />

We like OCBC for its relatively robust core banking<br />

profit (ex-GEH) and higher capitalisation position relative<br />

to peers. OCBC also provides a good exposure to both<br />

<strong>the</strong> Singapore and Malaysia banking sector. Any upside<br />

in GEH’s contribution could be ano<strong>the</strong>r re-rating catalyst<br />

for OCBC. Maintain BUY, TP at S$5.70.<br />

Core banking operating parameters relatively<br />

resilient. Excluding Great Eastern Holdings’ (“GEH”)<br />

contribution to earnings, OCBC’s core banking revenues<br />

are expected to remain relatively resilient. Close to 70%<br />

of its revenue is expected to be derived from net interest<br />

income. We expect GEH to contribute only 8.5% of<br />

total revenue. Key drag to earnings would be provisions<br />

as <strong>the</strong> credit cycle deteriorates.<br />

Stressed asset quality assumptions. We have<br />

imputed higher asset quality indicators in our<br />

assumptions with NPL ratios inching up to 2.4% in 2009<br />

from 2% in 2008. We have also assumed a higher<br />

provision charge-off rate of 57bps in 2009 from 43bps<br />

in 2008 (ex CDO provisions, provision charge-off rate<br />

was approximately only 23bps). On a worst case, we<br />

project NPL ratios to inch up to 3.8%. Based on our<br />

sensitivity analysis, for every 1ppt increase in NPL ratio,<br />

OCBC’s earnings would decline by 6.3%.<br />

Still our preference for banks. Our BUY call for<br />

OCBC is maintained with TP at S$5.70. Supporting our<br />

call is OCBC’s dividends which we believe would be<br />

sustainable at 28cents per year. OCBC’s Tier-1 CAR is by<br />

far <strong>the</strong> highest compared to its peers. Aside from its<br />

core banking business exposure in Singapore and<br />

Malaysia which remains robust, key upside to our<br />

numbers would be better than expected contribution<br />

from GEH.<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 39.5 46.1 53.1<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: OCBC is <strong>the</strong> largest financial institution in <strong>the</strong><br />

combined Singapore-Malaysia market, in terms of assets S$137<br />

billion.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 3,127<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 14,163 / 9,369<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Selat Pte Ltd (%) 11.2<br />

Aberdeen Asset Management 5.0<br />

Free Float (%) 83.9<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 7,628<br />

Page 56<br />

“In Singapore, this research report or research analyses may only be distributed to<br />

Institutional Investors, Expert Investors or Accredited Investors as defined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Securities</strong><br />

and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore.”<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

OCBC<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 2,783 2,900 3,199 3,363 Cash/Bank Balance 7,028 7,978 8,456 8,964<br />

Non-Interest Income 1,458 1,428 1,494 1,588 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 13,992 16,517 19,497 23,014<br />

Operating Income 4,241 4,329 4,693 4,951 Inter Bank Assets 15,353 15,219 16,139 17,137<br />

Operating Expenses (1,900) (2,048) (2,209) (2,382) Total Net Loans & Advs. 79,808 84,550 89,663 95,207<br />

Pre-provision Profit 2,341 2,280 2,484 2,569 Investment 10,174 12,682 13,449 14,281<br />

Provisions (447) (484) (499) (485) Associates 132 138 144 150<br />

Associates 6 6 6 6 Fixed Assets 2,391 2,355 2,355 2,355<br />

Exceptionals 263 0 0 0 Goodwill 3,376 3,334 3,334 3,334<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,163 1,803 1,991 2,090 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 204,204 222,051 234,617 248,517<br />

Taxation (264) (306) (339) (355) Life Ass Fund Inv Assets 38,877 38,877 38,877<br />

Minority Interests (111) (93) (102) (107) Total Assets 181,385 194,332 205,363 217,600<br />

Preference Dividend (39) (39) (39) (39) Customer Deposits 94,078 99,723 105,706 112,048<br />

Net Profit 1,749 1,365 1,511 1,588 Inter Bank Deposits 10,113 13,948 17,126 21,040<br />

Net Profit bef Except 1,486 1,365 1,511 1,588 Debts/Borrowings 6,010 6,010 6,010 6,010<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 181,723 196,478 207,544 219,830<br />

Minorities 2,686 2,779 2,881 2,988<br />

Shareholders' Funds 4,582 4,674 4,777 4,884<br />

Life Ass Fund Liabs 39,736 39,736 39,736<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 181,385 194,332 205,363 217,600<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 4.29 4.04 4.11 4.11 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 86.5 86.7 86.9 87.2<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.18 2.14 2.16 2.21 Net Loans / Total Assets 44.0 43.5 43.7 43.8<br />

Spread 2.11 1.90 1.96 1.90 Investment / Total Assets 5.6 6.5 6.5 6.6<br />

Net Interest Margin 2.27 2.20 2.25 2.20 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 85.4 83.3 82.0 80.6<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 44.8 47.3 47.1 48.1 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 9.2 11.7 13.3 15.1<br />

Employees ( Year End) 20,402 22,442 24,687 27,155 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 12.2 17.0 17.0 17.0 NPL / Total Gross Loans 1.7 2.4 2.6 2.3<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.0<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 65.6 67.0 68.2 67.9 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 34.4 33.0 31.8 32.1 Total CAR 15.2 15.2 15.5 15.6<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 18.3 18.5 18.1 18.2 Tier-1 CAR 14.9 14.7 14.7 14.6<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 16.1 14.5 13.7 13.8 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 12 6 6 6<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 10.3 9.5 10.0 10.0 Customer Deposits 6 6 6 6<br />

ROAE 12.2 9.5 10.0 10.0<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8<br />

ROA 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008<br />

Net Interest Income 639 678 684 783<br />

Non-Interest Income 377 361 462 259<br />

Operating Income 1,016 1,039 1,146 1,042<br />

Operating Expenses (438) (485) (504) (475)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 578 554 642 567<br />

Provisions 8 (55) (156) (243)<br />

Associates 2 3 5 (3)<br />

Exceptionals 165 44 0 (51)<br />

Pretax Profit 753 546 491 270<br />

Taxation (111) (115) (81) 20<br />

Minority Interests (20) (6) (8) (40)<br />

Net Profit 622 425 402 250<br />

(S$)<br />

12.00<br />

10.00<br />

8.00<br />

6.00<br />

4.00<br />

2.00<br />

0.00<br />

97<br />

98<br />

99<br />

00<br />

01<br />

02<br />

03<br />

04<br />

05<br />

06<br />

07<br />

08<br />

09<br />

PBV 2.0x<br />

PBV 1.7x<br />

PBV 1.3x<br />

PBV 0.9x<br />

PBV 0.5x<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 57


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

SembCorp Marine<br />

Bloomberg: SMM SP | Reuters: SCMN.SI<br />

BUY S$1.49 STI : 1,584.86<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 1.88<br />

Potential Catalyst: Easing of credit crunch<br />

Analyst<br />

Wee Lee Chong CFA +65 6398 7971<br />

weelee@dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

6.10<br />

5.10<br />

4.10<br />

3.10<br />

2.10<br />

1.10<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Sem bCorp M arine (LHS) Relative STI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

R elative In d ex<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 4,513 5,064 5,159 5,454<br />

EBITDA 497 634 615 677<br />

Pre-tax Profit 365 545 567 628<br />

Net Profit 241 430 462 513<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 321 474 462 513<br />

EPS (S cts) 11.7 20.8 22.3 24.8<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 15.6 22.9 22.3 24.8<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 51 47 (3) 11<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 11.5 20.4 21.9 24.4<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 8.7 9.3 7.8 8.7<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 81.1 63.6 76.6 93.6<br />

PE (X) 12.7 7.2 6.7 6.0<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 9.5 6.5 6.7 6.0<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 13.6 7.2 6.5 6.1<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 5.6 2.0 5.2 3.9<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 5.9 6.3 5.2 5.8<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.8 2.3 1.9 1.6<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH 0.0 CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 16.0 28.7 31.8 29.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 23.7 22.1<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Industrial Engineering<br />

Principal Business: Principal activities are ship repair, shipbuilding,<br />

ship conversion rig building and offshore engineering.<br />

250<br />

230<br />

210<br />

190<br />

170<br />

150<br />

130<br />

110<br />

90<br />

Favored rig builder<br />

SMM has not seen any customer asking for order<br />

cancellation y-t-d. If this scenario persists past mid-<br />

2009, we believe that <strong>the</strong>re is upside potential to our<br />

earnings forecast, as our 15% orders cancellation<br />

assumption is removed from <strong>the</strong> earnings model. We<br />

believe that <strong>the</strong> rig cancellation risk will be smaller after<br />

mid-2009, as most of <strong>the</strong> contracts would have<br />

experienced >50% cash collection by <strong>the</strong>n, making<br />

order cancellation an undesirable choice for clients. We<br />

maintain BUY on SMM, with fair value of S$1.88.<br />

Lower cancellation risks. SMM has not seen any<br />

customer asking for order cancellation y-t-d, which is<br />

good news. We believe that <strong>the</strong> rig cancellation risk will<br />

be smaller after mid-2009, as most of <strong>the</strong> contracts would<br />

have experienced >50% cash collection by <strong>the</strong>n, making<br />

order cancellation an undesirable choice for clients.<br />

Likelihood of more cash payment re-scheduling is<br />

low. We believe that cash payment re-scheduling risks<br />

are now lower than previous expectation; after SMM<br />

updates that its work progress for all rigs is on-schedule,<br />

with high cash payment collected to date.<br />

New orders for conversions to remain healthy. While<br />

acknowledging that <strong>the</strong> pickup in new rig orders is<br />

dependent on <strong>the</strong> lifting of credit crunch, SMM is<br />

confident that 2009 is unlikely to be a barren year for<br />

new orders. The group is still getting good enquiries on<br />

offshore conversion jobs, and is exploring <strong>the</strong> possibility<br />

of getting contracts on uncompleted units from clients.<br />

Upside potential to earnings forecast. As mid-2009<br />

approaches, we believe that <strong>the</strong>re is upside potential to<br />

our earnings forecast, as our 15% orders cancellation<br />

assumption is removed from <strong>the</strong> earnings model. We<br />

maintain BUY on SMM. Our fair value of S$1.88 uses<br />

SOTP valuation metric, with 8.4x implied FY09 PE.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 2,071<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 3,086 / 2,042<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Sembcorp Industries Ltd (%) 60.8<br />

Free Float (%) 39.2<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 8,862<br />

Page 58<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

SembCorp Marine<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 4,513 5,064 5,159 5,454 Net Fixed Assets 676 698 691 684<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (4,102) (4,409) (4,538) (4,766) Invts in Associates & JVs 206 270 315 379<br />

Gross Profit 411 655 620 688 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 736 209 209 209<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (62) (153) (127) (153) Cash & ST Invts 753 2,054 544 716<br />

Operating Profit 349 502 493 535 Inventory 1,561 835 1,735 1,834<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 451 480 938 992<br />

Associates & JV Inc 82 65 56 74 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 81 66 66 66<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 14 22 18 19 Total Assets 4,463 4,612 4,498 4,880<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (80) (44) 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 365 545 567 628 ST Debt 260 202 202 202<br />

Tax (113) (94) (88) (96) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 2,138 2,909 2,161 2,522<br />

Minority Interest (11) (21) (17) (19) LT Debt 182 20 370 20<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 178 120 120 120<br />

Net Profit 241 430 462 513 Shareholder’s Equity 1,680 1,318 1,586 1,938<br />

Net Profit before Except. 321 474 462 513 Minority Interests 26 42 59 77<br />

EBITDA 497 634 615 677 Total Cap. & Liab. 4,463 4,612 4,498 4,880<br />

Sales Gth (%) 27.3 12.2 1.9 5.7 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (45) (1,528) 578 370<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 55.0 27.4 (2.9) 10.0 Net Cash/(Debt) 312 1,832 (28) 493<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 52.9 43.8 (1.7) 8.5<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 1.1 78.4 7.4 11.2<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 31.0 17.2 15.6 15.3<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 365 545 567 628 Gross Margins (%) 9.1 12.9 12.0 12.6<br />

Dep. & Amort. 64 71 66 67 Opg Profit Margin (%) 7.7 9.9 9.6 9.8<br />

Tax Paid (45) (43) (167) (88) Net Profit Margin (%) 5.3 8.5 9.0 9.4<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (82) (65) (56) (74) ROAE (%) 16.0 28.7 31.8 29.1<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 91 1,398 (2,027) 200 ROA (%) 6.1 9.5 10.1 10.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (181) 11 0 0 ROCE (%) 11.5 20.6 20.6 19.3<br />

Net Operating CF 212 1,917 (1,617) 733 Div Payout Ratio (%) 74.9 45.0 35.0 35.0<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (58) (96) (60) (60) Net Interest Cover (x) NM NM NM NM<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 229 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (1) 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 35.5 33.6 50.2 64.6<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 13 10 10 10 Creditors Turn (avg days) 104.5 127.1 113.7 101.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 0 1 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 124.5 100.7 104.9 138.6<br />

Net Investing CF 182 (85) (50) (50) Current Ratio (x) 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.3<br />

Div Paid (231) (215) (193) (162) Quick Ratio (x) 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 51 (220) 350 (350) Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH 0.0 CASH<br />

Capital Issues 24 (82) 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 13.1 43.1 10.5 27.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (1) (2) 0 0 Z-Score (X) 3.6 2.6 2.9 2.9<br />

Net Financing CF (157) (518) 157 (512) N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) 15.0 88.4 (1.4) 23.8<br />

Net Cashflow 237 1,314 (1,510) 172 Opg CFPS (S cts) 5.9 25.1 19.8 25.7<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 7.5 87.9 (81.0) 32.5<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008 FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 916 1,386 1,144 1,617 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (819) (1,248) (986) (1,356) Ship repair 731 795 823 852<br />

Gross Profit 97 138 159 262 Conversion/Offshore 1,131 1,354 1,450 2,556<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (17) (26) (16) (93) Rig Building 2,499 2,840 2,810 1,972<br />

Operating Profit 79 111 142 169 Shipbuilding 82 2 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>rs 71 73 75 74<br />

Associates & JV Inc 34 39 35 (43) Total 4,513 5,064 5,159 5,454<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 2 11 4 6<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 (44)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 115 161 181 88<br />

Tax (21) (28) (34) (11)<br />

Minority Interest (3) (5) (6) (8)<br />

Net Profit 91 128 141 69<br />

Net profit bef Except. 91 128 141 113<br />

EBITDA 129 167 196 145<br />

Sales Gth (%) (31.5) 51.3 (17.4) 41.4<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (24.3) 29.1 17.1 (26.0)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (37.3) 40.3 27.5 18.7<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 11,432.7 40.4 9.9 (50.7)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 10.6 10.0 13.9 16.2<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 8.7 8.0 12.4 10.4<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 10.0 9.3 12.3 4.3<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 59


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

SPH<br />

Bloomberg: SPH SP | Reuters: SPRM.SI<br />

BUY S$2.49 STI : 1,584.86<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 2.93<br />

Potential Catalyst: Lower than expected drop in AdEx.<br />

Analyst<br />

Andy Sim CFA +65 6398 7969<br />

andysim@dbsvickers.com<br />

Attractive valuations<br />

P/B at c.1.8x is at lowest point in <strong>the</strong> last 20 years.<br />

Previous lowest P/B was 1.95x, in 1998. Recently<br />

announced wage cuts savings will mitigate fall in ad<br />

revenues. We believe SPH’s share price (-30% since<br />

Jan’09) has already factored in <strong>the</strong> weaker economic<br />

outlook. Dividend yield is attractive at >8%. TP: S$2.93<br />

reflects a c.21% total returns upside.<br />

Price Relative<br />

S$<br />

5.10<br />

4.60<br />

4.10<br />

3.60<br />

R e la tiv e In d e x<br />

208<br />

188<br />

168<br />

148<br />

128<br />

Wage cuts savings... SPH will be cutting wages by<br />

2%-10% for 3,000 staff from 1 Apr. The estimated<br />

savings from this and profit-related bonuses is an<br />

estimated 20% in wage bill for its core operations.<br />

Wages account for c.25% of revenue and c.40% of <strong>the</strong><br />

Group’s costs. We view this as positive for <strong>the</strong> Group, to<br />

help mitigate <strong>the</strong> fall in ad revenues.<br />

3.10<br />

2.60<br />

2.10<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

SPH (LHS) R e la tive ST I IN D E X (R H S)<br />

FY Aug (S$ m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 1,160 1,301 1,301 1,201<br />

EBITDA 509 582 557 513<br />

Pre-tax Profit 576 522 522 479<br />

Net Profit 499 437 428 393<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 499 464 428 393<br />

EPS (S cts) 31.5 27.6 27.0 24.8<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 31.5 29.3 27.0 24.8<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 37 (7) (8) (8)<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 30.4 26.7 26.1 23.9<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 26.3 27.3 20.0 20.0<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 137.6 131.9 131.4 136.1<br />

PE (X) 7.9 9.0 9.2 10.1<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 7.9 8.5 9.2 10.1<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 7.1 7.9 8.1 8.8<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 7.0 6.3 6.7 7.1<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 10.5 11.0 8.0 8.0<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 23.6 20.5 20.5 18.5<br />

Earnings Rev (%): 0.0 0.0<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 25.1 24.3<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer Services<br />

ICB Sector: Media<br />

Principal Business: Publishes newspapers in Singapore and owns <strong>the</strong><br />

Paragon<br />

108<br />

88<br />

68<br />

48<br />

Offsets drop in ad revenues. According to latest data<br />

from Nelsen Media <strong>Research</strong>, advertising revenues<br />

(AdEx) for <strong>the</strong> period from Sep’08 to Feb ’09 fell by<br />

c.9.1% y-o-y. AdEx for Feb were down only 1% y-o-y, a<br />

sharp improvement from <strong>the</strong> deterioration in Jan when<br />

it fell by 25% y-o-y. We have assumed a 20% yoy drop<br />

for FY09F. This offsets our estimated savings from <strong>the</strong><br />

wage cuts.<br />

Expect a weak 2Q. We expect SPH’s 2Q09 results to be<br />

weak on a c.20% fall in ad revenues, coupled with high<br />

newsprint costs. We have taken this into account in our<br />

estimates.<br />

Outlook priced in, lowest P/B in 20 years. We<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> current share price (-30% since Jan’09) has<br />

already priced in <strong>the</strong> weak economic outlook. Valuations<br />

are very attractive at 1.8x P/B with a dividend yield of<br />

>8%, based on our 20cents DPS assumption.<br />

BUY, TP: S$2.93. Our sum-of-parts derived target price<br />

is $2.93, based on 12x on FY09F newspaper operations,<br />

RNAV for its properties and its net cash/investment. We<br />

believe its dominant position in print in Singapore, <strong>the</strong><br />

low valuation on a P/B basis and its attractive dividend<br />

yield of >8% should provide support for <strong>the</strong> share price.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,592<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 3,964 / 2,622<br />

Free Float (%) 100.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 6,142<br />

Page 60<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

SPH<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Aug 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Aug 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 1,160 1,301 1,301 1,201 Net Fixed Assets 499 490 479 469<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (557) (611) (636) (579) Invts in Associates & JVs 82 61 75 89<br />

Gross Profit 604 690 665 623 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 1,484 1,461 1,461 1,461<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (156) (169) (173) (173) Cash & ST Invts 937 854 749 856<br />

Operating Profit 448 521 492 450 Inventory 19 36 37 34<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 151 224 289 240<br />

Associates & JV Inc 3 (1) 4 4 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 19 24 24 24<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 125 29 26 25 Total Assets 3,191 3,151 3,115 3,175<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 (27) 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 576 522 522 479 ST Debt 1 1 1 1<br />

Tax (78) (86) (94) (86) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 359 367 366 350<br />

Minority Interest 0 2 0 0 LT Debt 574 574 544 544<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 75 108 108 108<br />

Net Profit 499 437 428 393 Shareholder’s Equity 2,180 2,089 2,084 2,160<br />

Net Profit before Except. 499 464 428 393 Minority Interests 3 12 12 12<br />

EBITDA 509 582 557 513 Total Cap. & Liab. 3,191 3,151 3,115 3,175<br />

Sales Gth (%) 13.6 12.1 0.0 (7.7) Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (170) (82) (15) (51)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 18.0 14.3 (4.3) (7.9) Net Cash/(Debt) 362 279 205 312<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 17.3 16.3 (5.6) (8.6)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 16.5 (12.4) (2.2) (8.1)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 13.5 16.5 18.1 18.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Aug 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Aug 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 576 522 522 479 Gross Margins (%) 52.0 53.1 51.1 51.8<br />

Dep. & Amort. 58 62 61 60 Opg Profit Margin (%) 38.6 40.0 37.8 37.4<br />

Tax Paid (86) (84) (92) (94) Net Profit Margin (%) 43.0 33.6 32.9 32.7<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (3) 1 (4) (4) ROAE (%) 23.6 20.5 20.5 18.5<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 14 (49) (69) 44 ROA (%) 16.0 13.8 13.7 12.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (139) 5 0 0 ROCE (%) 13.9 15.5 14.6 13.2<br />

Net Operating CF 420 457 418 484 Div Payout Ratio (%) 83.3 98.9 74.2 80.7<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (59) (55) (50) (50) Net Interest Cover (x) NM NM NM NM<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 46 133 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 30 (13) (10) (10) Debtors Turn (avg days) 39.5 52.6 72.0 80.4<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 70.5 70.7 64.4 67.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 0 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 19.7 18.5 23.3 25.1<br />

Net Investing CF 16 65 (60) (60) Current Ratio (x) 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.3<br />

Div Paid (383) (433) (433) (317) Quick Ratio (x) 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.1<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (40) 0 (30) 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Capital Issues 28 19 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 10.2 9.6 9.2 9.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 0 (19) 0 0 Z-Score (X) 0.0 5.8 4.3 4.3<br />

Net Financing CF (395) (433) (463) (317) N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) 22.9 17.6 12.9 19.6<br />

Net Cashflow 41 89 (105) 107 Opg CFPS (S cts) 25.6 31.9 30.7 27.7<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 22.8 25.4 23.2 27.4<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

FY Aug 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 298 344 346 340 Key Assumptions<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (137) (148) (149) (145) Adex growth y-o-y (%) 7.2 7.6 -20.0 2.0<br />

Gross Profit 162 196 197 195 Newsprint costs (US$/mt) 604 601 800 680<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (45) (57) (64) (62) Average US$/S$ 1.53 1.41 1.53 1.51<br />

Operating Profit 117 140 133 133<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates & JV Inc 3 (1) (1) (2)<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 0 21 2 (39) Sum-of-parts<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 (27) 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 120 160 108 92<br />

Tax (20) (27) (16) (21)<br />

Minority Interest 0 1 1 2<br />

Net Profit 100 133 93 73<br />

Net profit bef Except. 100 133 119 73<br />

EBITDA 135 154 148 148<br />

Sales Gth (%) (4.5) 15.5 0.6 (1.8)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (6.9) 14.0 (3.7) (0.3)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (11.3) 20.0 (4.9) (0.1)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (11.0) 33.9 (30.6) (21.1)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 54.2 57.1 56.9 57.4<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 39.1 40.6 38.4 39.1<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 33.4 38.7 26.7 21.5<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Newspaper &<br />

Magazine<br />

Properties<br />

Cash and<br />

Investment Holdings<br />

Methodology Val. (S$m) Value (S$)<br />

12x PER 2,264 1.43<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V RNAV<br />

1,933 1.22<br />

Estimate<br />

As at end 1Q09A 1,165 0.74<br />

less: debt at end<br />

(724) (0.46)<br />

1Q09A<br />

Total 4,638 2.93<br />

Page 61


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Venture Corporation<br />

Bloomberg: VMS SP | Reuters: VENM.SI<br />

BUY S$4.72 STI : 1,584.86<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 6.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Stronger than expected quarterly results<br />

Analyst<br />

Ai Teng Tan +65 6398 7967<br />

AiTeng@dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

17.50<br />

15.50<br />

13.50<br />

11.50<br />

9.50<br />

7.50<br />

5.50<br />

3.50<br />

S$<br />

R e la tive In d e x<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Venture Corporation (LHS) R e la t iv e S T I IN D E X (R H S )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 3,873 3,784 2,911 3,056<br />

EBITDA 380 246 263 277<br />

Pre-tax Profit 295 173 194 205<br />

Net Profit 300 167 183 194<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 300 167 183 194<br />

EPS (S cts) 110.0 60.8 66.8 70.8<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 110.0 60.8 66.8 70.8<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 25 (45) 10 6<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 110.0 60.8 66.8 70.8<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 58.0 50.0 50.0 50.0<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 691.2 691.8 708.6 729.4<br />

PE (X) 4.3 7.8 7.1 6.7<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 4.3 7.8 7.1 6.7<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 3.6 5.6 5.2 4.9<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 3.3 3.8 3.3 2.8<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 12.3 10.6 10.6 10.6<br />

P/Book Value (X) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 16.5 8.8 9.5 9.8<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 665 771<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Electronic & Electrical Equipm<br />

Principal Business: Venture is a global EMS player with strength in<br />

printing & imaging, PC peripherals, networking & comms & retail<br />

store solutions products.<br />

210<br />

190<br />

170<br />

150<br />

130<br />

110<br />

90<br />

70<br />

50<br />

30<br />

Outstanding yield<br />

Venture has proven that it continues to execute well in a<br />

tough market. While not recession proof, Venture is<br />

financially strong and ready to capture new opportunities<br />

and gain market share when competitors fail in this<br />

environment. Stock is trading at near trough valuations of<br />

6-7x FY09 PER and 0.7x P/NTA, backed by a 11%<br />

dividend yield. Maintain BUY with TP of S$6.00.<br />

Not without challenges but Venture strives to stay<br />

focus. Looking into Q1, historical seasonal revenue<br />

patterns will be exacerbated by <strong>the</strong> global recession,<br />

resulting in weaker than usual results. In fact, outlook<br />

statements from tech bellwe<strong>the</strong>rs point to 10-30%<br />

sequential decline in Q1. But, Venture intends to stay<br />

focus on expense control and operational efficiency to<br />

help cushion margin pressure.<br />

HP business impact could be less than expected. The<br />

addition of Foxconn to HP’s supplier base is bad news to<br />

existing suppliers but it will not be a complete loss for<br />

Venture because low value consumer printer is not a<br />

major part of HP business for Venture. In fact, in giving<br />

away non-ODM, which could be c. 10% of FY09<br />

operating profits or lesser if <strong>the</strong> relocation is phased out<br />

through FY10, Venture will see improvement in its<br />

working capital and profitability in <strong>the</strong> long run. Venture<br />

will maintain a stronghold on HP’s ODM business. In fact,<br />

our channel checks indicated that HP has parked new<br />

ODM projects with <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Good cash preservation, keeps dividend. Contrary to<br />

market’s fear of lower payout in difficult times, Ventures<br />

maintained its S$0.50 dividend, rewarding shareholder<br />

with a whopping 11% yield. Moving forward,<br />

management will maintain a tight rein on working capital<br />

management. Venture generated S$200m of FCF for Q4<br />

and exited FY08 with net cash of S$192m.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 274<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 1,294 / 856<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Aberdeen Asset Management 17.1<br />

Sprucegrove Inv (%) 8.1<br />

Ngit Liong Wong (%) 7.0<br />

Free Float (%) 67.8<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 1,118<br />

Page 62<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Venture Corporation<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 3,873 3,784 2,911 3,056 Net Fixed Assets 207 196 163 124<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (3,388) (3,315) (2,576) (2,705) Invts in Associates & JVs 112 114 114 115<br />

Gross Profit 484 469 335 351 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 992 822 802 782<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (206) (305) (143) (151) Cash & ST Invts 539 672 508 541<br />

Operating Profit 278 164 192 201 Inventory 547 539 529 556<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 32 17 5 5 Debtors 619 537 582 611<br />

Associates & JV Inc 5 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 32 37 37 37<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (20) (8) (4) (1) Total Assets 3,048 2,916 2,735 2,765<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 295 173 194 205 ST Debt 251 202 4 4<br />

Tax 8 (5) (10) (10) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 593 667 686 709<br />

Minority Interest (3) (1) (1) (1) LT Debt 259 120 70 20<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 49 29 29 29<br />

Net Profit 300 167 183 194 Shareholder’s Equity 1,885 1,896 1,942 1,999<br />

Net Profit before Except. 300 167 183 194 Minority Interests 11 3 4 5<br />

EBITDA 380 246 263 277 Total Cap. & Liab. 3,048 2,916 2,735 2,765<br />

Sales Gth (%) 23.9 (2.3) (23.1) 5.0 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 604 446 462 494<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 26.7 (35.1) 6.9 5.4 Net Cash/(Debt) 29 350 434 518<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 27.7 (41.1) 16.9 4.8<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 25.4 (44.4) 9.8 5.9<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) N/A 2.9 5.0 5.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 295 173 194 205 Gross Margins (%) 12.5 12.4 11.5 11.5<br />

Dep. & Amort. 65 65 66 71 Opg Profit Margin (%) 7.2 4.3 6.6 6.6<br />

Tax Paid (5) (16) (1) (10) Net Profit Margin (%) 7.7 4.4 6.3 6.3<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (5) 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 16.5 8.8 9.5 9.8<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 81 34 (24) (33) ROA (%) 9.9 5.6 6.5 7.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (7) 109 20 20 ROCE (%) 11.4 6.8 8.5 9.3<br />

Net Operating CF 424 365 254 253 Div Payout Ratio (%) 52.7 82.2 74.9 70.7<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (37) (33) (33) (33) Net Interest Cover (x) 14.0 19.7 52.1 142.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 39 36 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.1<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 58.6 55.8 70.2 71.3<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 2 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 50.4 51.1 64.3 63.6<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 38 (12) 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 62.0 61.0 77.7 75.2<br />

Net Investing CF 41 (8) (33) (33) Current Ratio (x) 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.4<br />

Div Paid (155) (137) (137) (137) Quick Ratio (x) 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (121) (189) (248) (50) Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Capital Issues 22 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 7.3 10.1 44.3 138.3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (47) (10) 0 0 Z-Score (X) 4.6 3.3 3.4 3.5<br />

Net Financing CF (301) (337) (385) (187) N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) 10.7 127.9 158.6 188.9<br />

Net Cashflow 164 20 (164) 33 Opg CFPS (S cts) 125.7 120.7 101.4 104.3<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 141.9 121.4 80.6 80.3<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008 FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 939 973 966 907 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (817) (853) (847) (797) Printing & Imaging 1,072 1,037 839 881<br />

Gross Profit 122 119 119 109 Computer Peripherals/Data 712 711 532 559<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (66) (53) (78) (108) Networking/Comms 711 708 497 522<br />

Operating Profit 56 66 41 2 Retail Store solutions 793 751 607 638<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 5 6 3 2 O<strong>the</strong>rs 585 577 435 457<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 (1) 2 Total 3,873 3,784 2,911 3,056<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (2) (2) (2) (2)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 59 69 41 4<br />

Tax (2) (3) (1) 1<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 56 66 40 5<br />

Net profit bef Except. 56 66 40 5<br />

EBITDA 77 86 58 6<br />

Sales Gth (%) (2.5) 3.6 (0.7) (6.1)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (20.8) 12.8 (33.3) (90.4)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (23.5) 17.5 (37.8) (96.1)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (24.2) 16.5 (38.9) (88.6)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 13.0 12.2 12.3 12.1<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 5.9 6.7 4.2 0.2<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 6.0 6.7 4.2 0.5<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 63


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Hong Kong/China<br />

Seek value amidst<br />

volatility<br />

HSI : 13,131<br />

HSCEI : 7,731<br />

HSI 3 / 12 mths Target : 15,490 / 17,790<br />

Expected Return : +18.0% / +35.5%<br />

HSCEI 3 / 12 mths Target : 8,560 / 10,700<br />

Expected Return : +10.7% / +38.4%<br />

Our bear-case analysis suggests strong support for <strong>the</strong> HS<br />

Index at 11,120 points. This is a level at which investors<br />

can find long-term value. A bear market rally may<br />

continue to unfold in <strong>the</strong> early part of Q2, as investors<br />

weigh efforts to unclog <strong>the</strong> US financial system, and<br />

policy direction in China. Even as this volatility gives rise<br />

to short-term trading opportunities, our investment stance<br />

remains defensive, given <strong>the</strong> still fragile macro backdrop,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> market’s hyper-sensitivity to news flow.<br />

In 2Q09, <strong>the</strong> markets will continue to gyrate with <strong>the</strong> news flow emanating from<br />

<strong>the</strong> financial sector in <strong>the</strong> US and Europe, and in response to economic data<br />

releases and disappointing results. However, <strong>the</strong> HK/China market will continue to<br />

be more resilient than o<strong>the</strong>r markets in <strong>the</strong> region, given <strong>the</strong> strong policy flexibility<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Chinese government. Against this backdrop, we expect <strong>the</strong> HS Index to<br />

trade within a broad range in Q2.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> two forceful tests of <strong>the</strong> HK/China cycle trough in <strong>the</strong> past 6 months, our<br />

bear-case 1x book value for HS Index and 1.2x for HSCEI have proven to be<br />

attractive entry levels for long-term investors. These fundamental support levels are<br />

based on our bear-case analysis of <strong>the</strong> market P/B and required earnings yield gaps<br />

during previous crisis periods. We estimate <strong>the</strong> upper end of <strong>the</strong> bear-rally range to<br />

be 1.4x and 1.6x book value for HS Index and HSCEI respectively.<br />

Still fragile macro fundamentals warrant a defensive investment stance. China<br />

infrastructure construction, <strong>the</strong> prime beneficiary of China’s massive stimulus<br />

package, remains our favoured sector. We stay positive on telecom equipment and<br />

pharmaceutical, while toll roads and consumer staples continued to be good<br />

choices for those looking for resiliency. Oil and gas was upgraded to positive as<br />

risk-return profile became more attractive. We remain neutral on HK and China<br />

property, and cautious on <strong>the</strong> banks.<br />

Alice Hui, CFA (852) 2971 1960 · alice_hui@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Gideon Lo, CFA (852) 2863 8880 · gideon_lo@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 64<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

Ed-LM/sa - TW


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Index Close Chng -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth - 12 mth<br />

52-Week<br />

19-Mar-09 Net 1 m (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

Hang Seng 13,131 108 1 -13 -32 -40 26,387 10,676<br />

HS China Ent 7,731 465 6 -8 -22 -32 14,783 4,792<br />

HS China Aff 3,025 27 1 -12 -19 -36 5,967 2,173<br />

HS Mid Cap 2,525 71 3 -1 -26 -41 4,942 2,065<br />

HS Small Cap 1,063 -72 -6 -5 -41 -54 2,780 832<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn shs) 3,916<br />

Value (HK$bn) 2,239<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

A review of 1Q09<br />

After a short-lived rally in December, <strong>the</strong> HK/China market felt<br />

<strong>the</strong> pinch of selling pressure again, as <strong>the</strong> global credit crisis<br />

has yet to see <strong>the</strong> light at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> dark tunnel. The fear<br />

continued to overrule greed in front of a series of bad news<br />

flow from disappointing corporate results, <strong>the</strong> drop of a series<br />

of economic data to multi-years-or-decades low and a new<br />

round of capitulation in <strong>the</strong> US market. Hang Seng Index and<br />

HSCEI fell 13% and 8% respectively in 1Q09.<br />

Among HS Index constituent sectors, Banking was <strong>the</strong> worst<br />

performing sector, due to <strong>the</strong> disappointing results of major<br />

banks and HSBC’s record-sized rights issues. The 46% collapse<br />

in <strong>the</strong> share price of HSBC has caused <strong>the</strong> HSI to fall 1,009<br />

points, accounting for 62% of <strong>the</strong> total index loss. The<br />

Commercial & Industrial and Property sub-index also fell 6.6%<br />

and 2.3%, respectively, while <strong>the</strong> utility sector outperformed<br />

on its resilient growth outlook.<br />

Economic data around <strong>the</strong> world continued to deteriorate<br />

sharply in 1Q09. Against this backdrop, China stood out for its<br />

still positive growth and debt free status. Amidst <strong>the</strong> current<br />

global financial crisis, China’s strong flexibility in fiscal and<br />

monetary policies has become <strong>the</strong> last anchor for investors to<br />

maintain <strong>the</strong>ir confidence in <strong>the</strong> HK/China equity market.<br />

Against <strong>the</strong> backdrop of strong government policy support, <strong>the</strong><br />

broader HK/China market (ex HSBC) proved relatively resilient<br />

compared with o<strong>the</strong>r markets during <strong>the</strong> past quarter. In<br />

contrast to <strong>the</strong> touch of new lows in <strong>the</strong> US market in early<br />

March, <strong>the</strong> HK/China market stayed clearly above <strong>the</strong> trough<br />

levels marked in last October. The A-share market was one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> best performing equity markets in <strong>the</strong> world, with <strong>the</strong><br />

Shanghai Composite Index up 15.9%. In Hong Kong, HSCEI<br />

also outperformed <strong>the</strong> HS Index by 5%.<br />

HS Index & HSCEI – Past 1 year<br />

28,000<br />

26,000<br />

24,000<br />

22,000<br />

20,000<br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

HSI<br />

100-day MA<br />

Mar-08 Jun-08 Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09<br />

Mar-08 Jun-08 Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

HSCEI<br />

100-day MA<br />

Page 65


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

MARKET OUTLOOK<br />

Global equity markets rallied in late March on hopes that<br />

concerted central bank reflation, and with <strong>the</strong> release of early<br />

details of <strong>the</strong> US Treasury’s PPIP plan. While momentum may<br />

be sustained in <strong>the</strong> short term, <strong>the</strong> still fragile global macro<br />

environment, and continued uncertainty over <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> US Treasury’s plans to unclog <strong>the</strong> US<br />

financial system suggests that a cautious investment stance<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> HK/China equity market is still warranted.<br />

Investors will need to get past fur<strong>the</strong>r weakness in yet-toreleased<br />

economic data points to be released in 2Q09. This<br />

includes a fur<strong>the</strong>r slump in China’s exports, deterioration in<br />

deflation and <strong>the</strong> continued slowdown in GDP growth<br />

momentum. Markets will also be buffeted by <strong>the</strong> unfolding of<br />

disappointing corporate earnings amid <strong>the</strong> results season in<br />

Hong Kong. Never<strong>the</strong>less, China’s policy flexibility would<br />

provide a cushion for HK/China market, and position it more<br />

favourably compared to <strong>the</strong> debt-laden countries in Europe<br />

and America.<br />

Our bear case analysis of HK/China market valuation suggests a<br />

strong support level of <strong>the</strong> HS Index at 11,120 points, which is<br />

equivalent to 1x 2009 book value and implied earnings yield<br />

gap of c.9%. This should be an attractively low level for longterm<br />

investors. However, fur<strong>the</strong>r bad news flow pertaining to<br />

<strong>the</strong> weakening economic figures and disappointing corporate<br />

results in 2Q09 will exert profit-taking pressure amidst <strong>the</strong><br />

current bear market rally.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> new wild card from <strong>the</strong> US bailout plan, we expect<br />

<strong>the</strong> market to enlarge its trading range in 2Q09. This rangetrading<br />

pattern will continue until <strong>the</strong> market can see more<br />

convincing recovery signals in <strong>the</strong> future. In 2Q09, we expect<br />

<strong>the</strong> HS Index to trade in <strong>the</strong> range of 11,120 to 15,490, based<br />

on 1-1.4x forward book value. The target range for HSCEI is<br />

6,420 to 8,560, based on 1.2-1.6x forward book value.<br />

China M1 and M2 growth China real GDP growth China electricity output growth<br />

%<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Jan-00<br />

Jan-01<br />

Jan-02<br />

Jan-03<br />

Jan-04<br />

M1<br />

Jan-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

M2<br />

Jan-09<br />

Yoy, %<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1Q97<br />

3Q98<br />

1Q00<br />

3Q01<br />

1Q03<br />

3Q04<br />

1Q06<br />

3Q07<br />

1Q09F<br />

Yoy, %<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

(5)<br />

(10)<br />

(15)<br />

Jan-98<br />

Jan-00<br />

Jan-02<br />

Jan-04<br />

Jan-06<br />

Jan-08<br />

Source: CEIC Source: CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong> Economics <strong>Research</strong> Source: CEIC<br />

Growth and liquidity<br />

In March, <strong>the</strong> HS Index successfully defended its previous<br />

trough of 11,016 points, which was marked in last October,<br />

despite <strong>the</strong> heavy sell-off activities in major equity markets with<br />

<strong>the</strong> US market reaching a new six-year low on renewed worries<br />

about <strong>the</strong> outlook of <strong>the</strong> banking sector and fears of a<br />

prolonged recession/depression. However, from this<br />

attractively low level, <strong>the</strong> market has suddenly staged a new<br />

round of rally in late March, driven by <strong>the</strong> US government’s<br />

announcement of <strong>the</strong> PPIP plan to free up US banks from toxic<br />

assets. Never<strong>the</strong>less, given <strong>the</strong> still-fluid nature of<br />

developments, it is still too early to conclude that this brief rally<br />

marks <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> persistent bear market.<br />

In China, <strong>the</strong> solid M2 growth and recovery in <strong>the</strong> Purchasing<br />

Managers’ Index (PMI) in China are positive signs that <strong>the</strong><br />

expansionary fiscal and monetary policies have started to take<br />

effect in certain economic segments. Banks’ reported record<br />

growth in new Rmb loans during Jan-Feb also suggests credit<br />

expansion in China in 1Q09, versus <strong>the</strong> persistent deleveraging<br />

pressure in <strong>the</strong> world’s financial markets.<br />

In February, China’s M2, <strong>the</strong> broadest measures of money<br />

supply, posted 20.5% y-o-y growth, <strong>the</strong> fastest climb in <strong>the</strong><br />

past five years. The growth of M1, <strong>the</strong> narrow measure of<br />

money supply, has also pulled up to 10.9% in February from its<br />

cycle trough of 6.7% in January. The money supply growth<br />

was mainly driven by <strong>the</strong> strong new Rmb loan growth of<br />

nearly Rmb2.7 trillion in <strong>the</strong> first two months this year.<br />

Page 66


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

As <strong>the</strong> central banks pledged to generate not less than Rmb5<br />

trillion new loans in 2009, we believe <strong>the</strong> M1 growth has<br />

already reached its cycle trough in January, and should return<br />

to a new expansion cycle. We expect <strong>the</strong> aggressive loosening<br />

of monetary policy to help alleviate <strong>the</strong> pressure from <strong>the</strong><br />

global credit crisis on <strong>the</strong> contracting export sectors and<br />

domestic enterprises in China. However, <strong>the</strong> banks’ new loan<br />

growth may slow in 2Q09, as <strong>the</strong> central government should<br />

reserve its options for fur<strong>the</strong>r policy support, if necessary, till<br />

2H09.<br />

In contrast to <strong>the</strong> balance-sheet recession risk faced by <strong>the</strong> US<br />

economy, China should see more effective monetary measures<br />

to revive its domestic economic growth, given its relatively debt<br />

free position and young consumer base. As such, we are<br />

optimistic that China’s GDP growth will recover to over 8% in<br />

2H2009, despite <strong>the</strong> lacklustre near-term economic outlook in<br />

2Q2009. This is especially <strong>the</strong> case in view of <strong>the</strong> high<br />

correlation between China’s money supply and its domestic<br />

growth in previous economic cycles.<br />

China PMI<br />

%<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Jan-05<br />

Aug-05<br />

Mar-06<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

Oct-06<br />

The expansionary monetary measures appear to have mitigated<br />

<strong>the</strong> contraction pressure in domestic manufacturing activities.<br />

This is reflected in <strong>the</strong> recovery of <strong>the</strong> PMI for <strong>the</strong> past three<br />

consecutive months, from <strong>the</strong> record low of 38.8 in November<br />

to 49 in February. The recovery of Chinese electricity output to<br />

positive growth in February added to <strong>the</strong> positive signals. These<br />

positive figures suggest that <strong>the</strong> country’s manufacturing<br />

activities are almost back to expansionary mode.<br />

Dissecting <strong>the</strong> PMI sub-indexes in February, <strong>the</strong> expansionary<br />

signals (PMI more than 50) can be found in <strong>the</strong> activities<br />

relating to new orders (50.4), production (51.2) and supplier<br />

delivery (51.3), while <strong>the</strong> contractionary pressure (PMI less than<br />

50) remained in activities relating to employment (46.1),<br />

inventories (45.6 – 47.7) and new export orders (43.4).<br />

May-07<br />

Dec-07<br />

Jul-08<br />

Feb-09<br />

Indeed, <strong>the</strong> PMI sub-indexes suggest that <strong>the</strong> key challenges to<br />

economy in 2Q09 should come from <strong>the</strong> following:<br />

1) The slump in overseas demand will exert heavy earnings<br />

pressure to enterprises and industries in <strong>the</strong> coastal regions,<br />

which depends mainly on <strong>the</strong> exports to overseas. China’s<br />

export value pulled back by nearly 21% y-o-y in <strong>the</strong> first two<br />

months this year.<br />

2) While <strong>the</strong> employment growth will lag behind <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

in manufacturing activities, we expect <strong>the</strong> unemployment rates<br />

to deteriorate continuously in <strong>the</strong> coming few months. This<br />

will adversely affect <strong>the</strong> domestic consumption markets.<br />

3) The high inventory levels imply that de-stocking activities<br />

will continue, which means fur<strong>the</strong>r deflationary pressure in<br />

China. At <strong>the</strong> micro level, this will fur<strong>the</strong>r exert pressure on<br />

enterprises’ profit in <strong>the</strong> form of impairment losses on<br />

inventory cost.<br />

China CPI and PPI<br />

Yoy, %<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

PPI<br />

2004<br />

CPI<br />

2005<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

Against this macro backdrop, corporate profits will continue to<br />

be under pressure, especially for those companies in cyclical<br />

sectors with serious problems of excess capacity. However, as<br />

<strong>the</strong> fall of PPI is faster than <strong>the</strong> CPI, it will improve <strong>the</strong> profit<br />

margin of companies in defensive sectors, like healthcare, Food<br />

& Beverage and utilities, given <strong>the</strong>ir resilient growth outlook<br />

and firm pricing power.<br />

Compared to China, Hong Kong’s economy (domestically<br />

oriented stocks) remains more vulnerable to <strong>the</strong> global financial<br />

crisis and recession, given its relatively small and open<br />

characteristics. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> new government budget for<br />

2009/10 has been viewed as being too conservative to<br />

revitalize <strong>the</strong> economy and prevent a continuous spiral of <strong>the</strong><br />

unemployment rate in <strong>the</strong> territory. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong><br />

HK/China equity market performance is hinged more to <strong>the</strong><br />

Chinese economy than to HK economy.<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

Page 67


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first three months of this year, we have cut <strong>the</strong><br />

aggregate earnings forecast for <strong>the</strong> HS Index by 20% and 26%<br />

in 2008 and 2009, respectively, which reflected mainly <strong>the</strong><br />

bearish near-term earnings outlook for <strong>the</strong> banking and oil<br />

sectors. We cut <strong>the</strong> 2009 earnings forecast of <strong>the</strong> banking<br />

sector by 34% after major Hong Kong banks announced <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

disappointing results in March. We also cut <strong>the</strong> earnings<br />

forecast of <strong>the</strong> three major oil counters by 26-39% in 2009<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> lower crude oil price targets. After <strong>the</strong> latest round<br />

of earnings revisions, we expect <strong>the</strong> aggregate earnings for <strong>the</strong><br />

HS Index to fall 35.7% in 2008 and 5.9% in 2009.<br />

Aggregate Earnings for HSI<br />

HK$m 2008<br />

08E<br />

%<br />

Chg 2009<br />

09F<br />

%<br />

Chg 2010<br />

10F<br />

%<br />

Chg<br />

Finance 143,943 -48.3 139,041 -3.4 156,452 12.5<br />

Infra & Utilities 60,816 -16.5 48,152 -20.8 62,128 29.0<br />

Properties 28,328 -25.0 26,448 -6.6 29,727 12.4<br />

Conglomerates 11,021 -67.8 15,290 38.7 18,820 23.1<br />

Comm/Ind 11,161 -41.5 13,749 23.2 20,966 52.5<br />

Telecom & Media 52,995 41.9 47,540 -10.3 52,566 10.6<br />

HSI Total 308,263 -35.7 290,220 -5.9 340,660 17.4<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

We also cut <strong>the</strong> aggregate earnings forecast of HSCEI by 15%<br />

and 18%, respectively, in 2008 and 2009. The downgrades<br />

were across all sectors, with especially heavier weight from <strong>the</strong><br />

earnings decline in oil and commodities counters due to <strong>the</strong><br />

reflection of more bearish effects from economic recession to<br />

global commodities’ prices. After <strong>the</strong> earnings downgrades,<br />

we forecast HSCEI earnings will decline 15.6% in 2008 and<br />

1.5% in 2009.<br />

Aggregate Earnings for HSCEI<br />

HK$m 2008<br />

08E<br />

%<br />

Chg 2009<br />

09F<br />

%<br />

Chg 2010<br />

10F<br />

%<br />

Chg<br />

Consumer 1,597 1.7 1,577 -1.2 1,735 10.0<br />

Energy 32,322 -20.7 30,109 -6.8 40,226 33.6<br />

Financials 63,446 9.7 62,159 -2.0 69,998 12.6<br />

Industrial Goods 1,381 -16.8 1,244 -10.0 1,311 5.4<br />

Materials 3,490 -66.1 3,907 11.9 9,787 150.5<br />

Utilities -608 -121.3 1,966 nm 2,509 27.6<br />

Ppty & Construc 5,995 3.1 7,959 32.8 10,105 27.0<br />

Services 8,640 -31.6 2,387 -72.4 2,304 -3.5<br />

Telecom & Tech 671 -87.0 3,836 471.8 5,257 37.0<br />

HSCEI Total 116,934 -15.6 115,145 -1.5 143,231 24.4<br />

Valuations<br />

Post <strong>the</strong> meltdown in Oct 2008 and <strong>the</strong> recent re-test of <strong>the</strong><br />

lows again in March 2009; we believe <strong>the</strong> 11,000 level<br />

represents an attractive entry point for value investors. It is<br />

probably too early to call start of a new bull trend, and we see<br />

<strong>the</strong> current rebound as a bear market rally, which could last<br />

into <strong>the</strong> early part of 2Q09. The bounce off <strong>the</strong> 11,000 level is<br />

consistent with fundamental support levels seen during<br />

previous crises periods.<br />

The market will remain volatile amid <strong>the</strong> extremely poor<br />

earnings visibility in market. As such, we try to explore <strong>the</strong><br />

bearish scenario of <strong>the</strong> market support level, with stress test, in<br />

order to seek an attractive entry point for long-term investors.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> PE method will lose its reliability amid a bear market,<br />

we have conducted a study to gauge <strong>the</strong> possible valuation<br />

downside in <strong>the</strong> market based on our P/BV and earnings yield<br />

analysis.<br />

Admittedly, <strong>the</strong> recent sell-off in <strong>the</strong> market, and persistently<br />

low interest rates has led to a very attractive earnings yield gap<br />

for <strong>the</strong> HS Index despite our earnings downgrades for 2008<br />

and 2009. We find that <strong>the</strong> yield gap, which is <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

between <strong>the</strong> earnings yield and <strong>the</strong> three-month HIBOR, for<br />

<strong>the</strong> HS Index has increased to a record high of nearly 8% in<br />

2009, which is well above <strong>the</strong> historical mean and <strong>the</strong> peak<br />

level of about 5-6% during previous crises.<br />

In our view, <strong>the</strong> current high yield gap should be attractive<br />

enough for long-term investors. This may reflect <strong>the</strong> higher<br />

risk premium required by investors for equity investment amid<br />

a bearish market. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> current high yield gap has<br />

already exceeded all <strong>the</strong> peak levels during previous major<br />

crises, like <strong>the</strong> Asian Financial crisis and SARS period, in <strong>the</strong><br />

Hong Kong market. Based on +1 SD of <strong>the</strong> historical range, or<br />

c. 6% required earnings yield gap, we believe <strong>the</strong> fair HS index<br />

level would sit at around 15,900, or 14.5x 2009 PE.<br />

The risk of our earnings yield gap analysis may come from<br />

possible fur<strong>the</strong>r earnings downgrade of index stocks or a sharp<br />

rise of funding costs from <strong>the</strong> current low level. However,<br />

even if we fur<strong>the</strong>r cut our earnings forecast and raise <strong>the</strong><br />

target PE for HS Index from current 12x to 15x, <strong>the</strong> earnings<br />

yield gap will remain at c. 5-6%, which is still high compared<br />

to historical levels. Regarding <strong>the</strong> funding cost, we do not see<br />

high risk of sharp rise in HIBOR in <strong>the</strong> coming 12 months due<br />

to <strong>the</strong> current bank deposit protection plan in Hong Kong.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 68


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings Yield Gap for <strong>the</strong> Hang Seng Index<br />

Historical PB for <strong>the</strong> Hang Seng Index<br />

%<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

(2)<br />

(4)<br />

(6)<br />

(8)<br />

(10)<br />

Yield Gap<br />

(Earnings Yield - 3-mth HIBOR)<br />

+1 SD<br />

Mean<br />

-1 SD<br />

x<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

Sep-93<br />

Sep-95<br />

Sep-97<br />

Sep-99<br />

Mean<br />

+2SD<br />

+1SD<br />

Sep-01<br />

Sep-03<br />

-1SD<br />

-2SD<br />

Sep-05<br />

Sep-07<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

2002<br />

2004<br />

2006<br />

2008<br />

2010<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Bands are +/- SD and average from 1993<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Price to book is ano<strong>the</strong>r reliable valuation metric amid a bearish<br />

market with low earnings visibility. Over <strong>the</strong> past 15 years, <strong>the</strong><br />

HS Index has been trading in a wide range of c. 1 – 3.5x P/B<br />

value. The current P/BV has already fallen to its previous<br />

trough of 1x during <strong>the</strong> Asian Financial crisis in 1998. At 1x<br />

P/BV, <strong>the</strong> HS Index has also been as low as minus two standard<br />

deviations, which we believe is an attractively low level for<br />

long-term investors. We also apply <strong>the</strong> 1x P/BV to derive<br />

11,120 points as <strong>the</strong> bottom level for <strong>the</strong> HS Index.<br />

Notwithstanding <strong>the</strong> above analysis for <strong>the</strong> HS Index, <strong>the</strong> same<br />

analysis has limitations for HSCEI given <strong>the</strong> relatively shorter<br />

history of H shares in Hong Kong. However, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

HSCEI should trade at a valuation premium over <strong>the</strong> HS Index,<br />

as China-related companies should be <strong>the</strong> direct and major<br />

beneficiaries from <strong>the</strong> government’s policy support. While we<br />

set our P/BV range at 1-1.4x for HS Index, we believe <strong>the</strong> HSCEI<br />

should deserve a higher range of 1.2-1.6x in 2Q2009.<br />

Historical PB of HSCEI to HSI<br />

(x)<br />

1.80<br />

1.60<br />

1.40<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

0.80<br />

0.60<br />

0.40<br />

0.20<br />

0.00<br />

Oct-01<br />

+2SD<br />

+1SD<br />

Mean<br />

Oct-02<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Oct-03<br />

Oct-04<br />

Oct-05<br />

Oct-06<br />

-1SD<br />

-2SD<br />

Admittedly, we face <strong>the</strong> risk of possible dislocation of <strong>the</strong> fair<br />

market value from its historical trend due to <strong>the</strong> existing global<br />

economic crisis. As such, <strong>the</strong> predictability of our P/BV will also<br />

have its limitation, stemming from <strong>the</strong> possible risk of<br />

depletion in index companies’ book value. However, our basis<br />

of –2SD in setting our index trough target should be prudent<br />

enough to reflect <strong>the</strong> identified market risk, due to <strong>the</strong><br />

following reasons:<br />

Oct-07<br />

Oct-08<br />

1) Despite <strong>the</strong> risk of fur<strong>the</strong>r earnings downgrades, we believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> aggregate index book value would likely continue to<br />

increase as long as <strong>the</strong> constituent companies maintain positive<br />

overall profitability.<br />

2) The overall earnings and balance sheet quality of index<br />

companies have also improved, reflected by <strong>the</strong>ir higher<br />

existing ROE and lower net gearing ratios, compared to those<br />

in previous crises.<br />

Page 69


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Strategy<br />

Until <strong>the</strong>re are concrete signs of a resolution to <strong>the</strong> current<br />

financial crisis, market sentiment should continue to be<br />

overshadowed by <strong>the</strong> ongoing economic uncertainty and<br />

possibility of fur<strong>the</strong>r deterioration in macro data. We<br />

recommend investors to stay defensive in Q209, and stick to<br />

sectors that are relatively resilient to <strong>the</strong> economic downturn or<br />

those with policy support and potential for industry<br />

restructuring. This includes transport infrastructure, telecom<br />

equipment, pharmaceutical, toll roads, environment protection<br />

and consumer staples.<br />

The transport Infrastructure sector, which is a clear beneficiary<br />

of PRC’s Rmb4tr stimulus package, remains our favourite. We<br />

have highlighted our positive views towards railway<br />

infrastructure plays in our last quarterly report, considering <strong>the</strong><br />

low penetration of railway and huge investment in this<br />

segment going forward in <strong>the</strong> PRC. While we continue to<br />

favour this sector, our top pick for this quarter is China<br />

Communication Construction, considering its more attractive<br />

valuation and earnings upside from a potential speed-up in<br />

port projects within <strong>the</strong> Bohai region.<br />

We also maintain our positive stance on <strong>the</strong> China Telecom<br />

Equipment sector, in which growth should be secured by <strong>the</strong><br />

heavy capex on 3G with longer term potential from expanding<br />

overseas exposure. ZTE, our pick in last quarter, has grabbed a<br />

handsome return of over 52%. Considering <strong>the</strong> strong<br />

performance, we recommend that investors shift to its smaller<br />

peer Comba, as we see better re-rating potential given its<br />

strong earnings growth and growing global presence.<br />

Meanwhile, we are maintaining our Neutral stance on telecom<br />

services due to ongoing industry risks, but we continue to<br />

recommend China Mobile (details in company profile) which<br />

should offer better earnings visibility with downside limited by<br />

its attractive valuation.<br />

The pharmaceutical and healthcare sector is positioned to<br />

benefit from China’s stimulus plans and healthcare reforms.<br />

The latter would benefit market leaders. A sustainable 15-<br />

20% CAGR in market size aside, <strong>the</strong> sector offers resilient<br />

earnings against <strong>the</strong> economic slowdown as well as attractive<br />

valuation (less than 0.2x PEG and low single-digit PE).<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r defensive sectors are toll roads and consumer staples<br />

(see featured stock China Yurun) considering <strong>the</strong>ir relatively<br />

resilient earnings. We are also positive on environmental<br />

protection plays, given <strong>the</strong> supportive government policy and<br />

benefits from <strong>the</strong> stimulus plan.<br />

We have raised our rating for oil & gas sector to Positive.<br />

Despite a weaker global environment, crude prices should find<br />

strong fundamental support at US$40 a barrel, a level which<br />

would motivate sizable cut in output as well as providing<br />

higher incentives for government to build strategic oil reserves.<br />

Valuations of China’s oil majors have already reached attractive<br />

levels for longer-term investors.<br />

We maintain our Cautious stance on China banking but have<br />

upgraded Hong Kong banks to Neutral in January, though risks<br />

could mount should <strong>the</strong> global financial crisis deteriorate<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r. In HK, <strong>the</strong> deepening global recession could lead to<br />

more severe capital outflow and export shrinkage than that<br />

experienced in <strong>the</strong> Asian crisis, with MTM losses to remain as a<br />

lingering concern. We have in fact downgraded HSBC to a Sell<br />

after its result and rights issue announcement in March (see<br />

stock profile). For China banks, looming NPL risks alongside<br />

<strong>the</strong> aggressive lending spurt, coupled with continual NIM<br />

pressure and uncertainties relating to fur<strong>the</strong>r stake sales by<br />

foreign strategic investors would likely to remain a key<br />

overhang.<br />

While we are maintaining a Neutral stance on both <strong>the</strong> HK and<br />

China property sectors, we are slightly more positive on <strong>the</strong><br />

latter. For China property, news flow may remain negative in<br />

<strong>the</strong> near term, especially with possible disappointment in<br />

earnings and potential for fur<strong>the</strong>r price cuts from developers.<br />

A solid recovery may still take time but <strong>the</strong> strong rebound in<br />

sales in recent months should help ease pressure on inventory.<br />

We have also seen stronger players outperforming <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

competitors and recording strong sales performance. After <strong>the</strong><br />

sell-offs in past few months, investment value has started to<br />

become compelling for some quality plays, with our favourites<br />

being China Overseas and CR Land.<br />

Meanwhile, we expect <strong>the</strong> HK property market to continue its<br />

downward spiral in view of anticipation of fur<strong>the</strong>r economic<br />

deterioration. We expect residential prices to fall 20% in<br />

2009, retail rents to drop 10-20% while office rents will<br />

plunge a total of 40-50% before end-2010. Fur<strong>the</strong>r downside<br />

risk on asset value has prompted us to maintain a Neutral<br />

stance on HK property counters despite <strong>the</strong> fact that most of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir valuations have already fallen to levels seen during <strong>the</strong><br />

previous market trough.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> remaining sectors, we are Neutral on base materials<br />

with a positive bias on coal given sound financial position of<br />

coal counters and attractive valuations. The still fragile global<br />

macro environment has prompted us to stay cautious on<br />

shipping, industrial and technology sectors.<br />

Page 70


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Economic Indicators<br />

2005A 2006A 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

China<br />

GDP Growth (%) 10.4 11.6 13.0 9.0 7.5 8.0<br />

FDI (US$bn) 72 73 84 108 87 80<br />

Exports (yoy %) 28 27 26 17 0 15<br />

Retail Sales (yoy %) 12.9 13.7 16.8 21.6 16.0 17.5<br />

CPI (yoy %) 1.8 1.5 4.8 5.9 0.0 2.5<br />

Hong Kong<br />

GDP Growth (%) 7.1 7.0 6.4 2.5 -3.5 2.8<br />

CPI (yoy %) 0.9 2.0 2.0 4.3 1.0 1.0<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> Economics <strong>Research</strong><br />

Valuation – HSI<br />

Index Earnings Growth (%) PE (x) Yield (%)<br />

19-Mar 08E 09F 10F 08E 09F 10F 08E 09F 10F<br />

Finance -48.3 -3.4 12.5 11.9 12.4 11.0 7.0 4.4 4.7<br />

Power, Infrastructure & Utilities -16.5 -20.8 29.0 10.3 13.0 10.0 4.1 3.4 4.2<br />

Properties -25.0 -6.6 12.4 12.1 13.0 11.5 3.5 3.4 2.4<br />

ex Cheung Kong -8.0 -12.5 13.5 12.9 14.8 13.0 3.4 3.3 1.7<br />

Hongs/Conglomerates -67.8 38.7 23.1 17.7 12.8 10.4 4.4 4.3 4.5<br />

ex Hutchison -82.5 209.9 4.7 33.5 10.8 10.3 4.5 4.3 4.5<br />

Comm/Ind -41.5 23.2 52.5 18.1 14.7 9.6 3.9 4.0 4.7<br />

Telecom & Media 41.9 -10.3 10.6 8.6 9.6 8.7 4.0 4.4 4.9<br />

HSI 13131 -35.7 -5.9 17.4 11.5 12.2 10.4 5.4 4.1 4.4<br />

HSI ex Cheung Kong and Hutchison -34.9 -5.5 16.8 11.5 12.2 10.4 5.5 4.1 4.4<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Valuation – HSCEI<br />

Index Earnings Growth (%) PE (x) Yield (%)<br />

19-Mar 08E 09F 10F 08E 09F 10F 08E 09F 10F<br />

Consumer 1.7 -1.2 10.0 9.7 9.8 8.9 2.0 2.1 2.3<br />

Energy -20.7 -6.8 33.6 13.4 14.4 10.8 2.8 2.4 3.1<br />

Financials 9.7 -2.0 12.6 12.3 12.6 11.2 2.1 1.8 2.0<br />

Industrial Goods -16.8 -10.0 5.4 4.6 5.1 4.8 3.4 3.1 3.5<br />

Materials -66.1 11.9 150.5 37.3 33.3 13.3 1.1 0.9 1.3<br />

Utilities -121.3 nm 27.6 nm 14.8 11.6 0.3 3.1 3.9<br />

Property & Construction 3.1 32.8 27.0 21.1 15.9 12.5 1.1 1.5 1.9<br />

Services -31.6 -72.4 -3.5 6.2 22.6 23.4 4.0 1.7 1.5<br />

Telecom & Technology -87.0 471.9 37.0 77.3 13.5 9.9 2.3 1.8 2.6<br />

HSCEI 7731 -15.6 -1.5 24.4 13.9 14.1 11.4 2.2 1.9 2.2<br />

Ex oil * -8.9 0.1 19.9 14.7 14.7 12.2 2.0 1.8 2.0<br />

* Ex 386, 857<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 71


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for Hong Kong<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK<br />

SELECTION<br />

Property<br />

Neutral<br />

Since last December, housing market has shown signs of stabilization with price having<br />

recovered slightly. However, any optimism on residential market outlook should be unjustified<br />

in view of deteriorating economic fundamentals. We project a 20% decline in home prices in<br />

2009. Office vacancy has been rising as corporate continued to downsize <strong>the</strong>ir operations<br />

resulting in lower office demand. We forecast office rentals to decline 40-50% before end-<br />

2010, after declining 11% in 4Q08. No catalyst is thus expected for sustainable re-rating for<br />

property developers and investors. This is despite <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>ir current valuations are by<br />

no means demanding from historical perspective. The Link REIT and Fortune REITs remain our<br />

preferred stocks in <strong>the</strong> sector, in view of its income resilience.<br />

The Link REIT (0823)<br />

Banking and Finance<br />

Neutral<br />

Telecom<br />

Neutral<br />

Industrial<br />

Cautious<br />

Consumer<br />

Neutral<br />

We upgraded HK banks to NEUTRAL from very CAUTIOUS in Jan-09. But we may downgrade<br />

it back to CAUTIOUS again in future if <strong>the</strong> global financial crisis deepens. Capital outflow and<br />

export shrinkage this time should be more severe than <strong>the</strong> Asian crisis on severe global<br />

financial de-leveraging. Hence, we believe HK banks should trade below <strong>the</strong> trough P/B<br />

during Asian financial crisis. Bond prices on asset-backed securities and those issued by banks<br />

& financial institutions have fallen YTD, meaning <strong>the</strong>re may be fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM losses this year.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> peak loan provision should be lower than that of <strong>the</strong> Asian crisis thanks to low<br />

private sector debts, low interest rates and a healthier property market, <strong>the</strong> problem of MTM<br />

losses will continue to be a lingering concern.<br />

Competition in <strong>the</strong> local Hong Kong telecom market has subsided somewhat since mid-2008,<br />

which was partly due to <strong>the</strong> limited room for fur<strong>the</strong>r tariff cuts and clearer differentiated<br />

services and customer positioning among telcos. In terms of corporate activity, we think<br />

PCCW would eventually go through its privatization plan. Meanwhile, HIIL has planned to<br />

spin off its Hong Kong and Macau business in May09. Given <strong>the</strong> many uncertainties with<br />

PCCW and HITL, Smartone remains <strong>the</strong> only telecom company that could offer stable<br />

business operations. Going forward, Smartone would continue to face margin pressure, in<br />

view of its aggressive handset subsidy and capex plan on network upgrade. However,<br />

Smartone remains a good yield play and appealing to long investors.<br />

We remain cautious on <strong>the</strong> industrial sector as we believe negative surprises in <strong>the</strong> coming<br />

FY08 results season will dampen investors’ appetite. Surprises are expected to come from<br />

lower than expected margin (due to squeeze in selling prices) and higher than expected<br />

inventory write-off (due to drop in commodity prices). In addition, <strong>the</strong> business prospects of<br />

most exporters are still overshadowed by global recession. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, we believe<br />

those manufacturers that serve <strong>the</strong> domestic market will fare better, on continual strong<br />

domestic demand, positive policy and regulatory controls and strong market<br />

positioning. Among <strong>the</strong> industrial companies that benefit from <strong>the</strong>se parameters are China<br />

South Locomotive & Rolling Stock (who will benefit from <strong>the</strong> accelerated railway development<br />

program by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Railway and stronger demand for technically advanced train<br />

vehicles following <strong>the</strong> construction of new high-speed train tracks) and China Everbright<br />

International (who will benefit from increasing investments to streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> environmental<br />

and ecological infrastructure).<br />

The deteriorating economy has continued to affect local consumer sentiments. While January<br />

retail sales showed 7.4% yoy growth, this was largely due to impact of an earlier Chinese<br />

New Year, which fell in January this year instead of <strong>the</strong> usual February. With unemployment<br />

expected to remain on an uptrend, consumers should likely continue to trade down and be<br />

more price sensitive. As such, <strong>the</strong> more aggressive discounting and promotions seen in <strong>the</strong><br />

past few months should likely continue, meaning increasing margin pressure for retailers.<br />

While most listed retailers are already trading at undemanding valuation and <strong>the</strong>ir strong cash<br />

position should continue to support decent dividend yield ahead, catalyst is certainly lacking<br />

and earnings uncertainty remains. Hence we maintain NEUTRAL, with a preference towards<br />

those in staple products.<br />

Wing Hang Bank (302)<br />

(Fully Valued)<br />

Smartone (315)<br />

China South Locomotive &<br />

Rolling Stock (1766)<br />

China Everbright<br />

International (257)<br />

Café de Coral (341)<br />

Page 72


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK<br />

SELECTION<br />

Banking<br />

Cautious<br />

New loan made in Feb-09 continued to beat expectation even after strong growth during Nov.08<br />

and Jan.09, which shall lead to upward revisions in loan growth and delay in NPL formation. The<br />

government may also want to leave more "bullets" for later use by delaying interest rate cuts, and<br />

hence we may need to raise our NIM assumptions. However, <strong>the</strong>se positives are offset by <strong>the</strong><br />

negative impact due to fur<strong>the</strong>r hike in CBRC's requirement on provision coverage to 150% from<br />

130% for big five banks. Aggressive loan approvals may cast doubts on how banks conduct risk<br />

management in such a short period which may result in higher NPL in future. Global investors<br />

have already paid decent premiums to Chinese banks for <strong>the</strong> more resilient economic outlook of<br />

China. NIM pressure, fur<strong>the</strong>r stake sales by foreign strategic investors and asset quality risks,<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r with negative implications for fund flows due to global financial de-leveraging, remain<br />

our key concerns for <strong>the</strong> sector. We stick to our view that investors can only start bottom-fishing<br />

when <strong>the</strong> share prices of <strong>the</strong> Chinese banks trade close to <strong>the</strong> lowest end of <strong>the</strong> trading band we<br />

suggested. We maintain our SLIGHTLY CAUTIOUS view and recommend a long on ICBC and a<br />

short on BOC as a pair trade<br />

ICBC (1398 HK)<br />

Basic Materials<br />

Positive<br />

Coal<br />

Neutral<br />

Cement<br />

Neutral<br />

Steel<br />

Cautious<br />

Base metals<br />

Construction &<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Positive<br />

We remain POSITIVE on <strong>the</strong> coal sector in 2009, though we admit <strong>the</strong> traditionally low season for<br />

coal in 2Q will lead to a short-term downward pressure on spot coal prices. 2009 domestic<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmal coal contract price talk will come to a result in due course and we keep forecast of 10%<br />

contract price rise. We like China coal companies on <strong>the</strong>ir sound financial position and potentially<br />

high dividend yield. Meanwhile, expectations of mass start-up of large-scale state infrastructure<br />

projects in 2Q09 should help underscore sustainable demand for construction materials<br />

particularly cement in central/west China. Never<strong>the</strong>less, we retain our NEUTRAL stance on cement<br />

and steel, to reflect unattractive valuation on Anhui Conch Cement and concerns over unexciting<br />

1H09 earnings prospect for steel counters. As for base metals, we maintain our CAUTIOUS rating<br />

for 2Q09. Amidst lacking concrete signs of demand pickup from industrial end-users, we<br />

recommend investors to keep sidelined from China material stocks. Our top pick for 2Q09 is Asia<br />

Cement (China) Holdings. Target price is set at HK$4.95.<br />

The recent refinement of <strong>the</strong> stimulus package should not affect total investment in railway<br />

construction significantly. This is because <strong>the</strong>re are still unspent portions on railway development<br />

under <strong>the</strong> current 11 th 5-year plan, which has a total budget of Rmb1.25tr. The amount allocated<br />

for infrastructure sector (including railway, roads/expressway, waterways, power grids, etc) under<br />

<strong>the</strong> revised stimulus plan is reduced to Rmb1.5tr, compared to Rmb1.8tr previously announced.<br />

The new railway project momentum has been strong since after <strong>the</strong> stimulus package was<br />

announced. The major railway constructors have secured some Rmb400bn worth of new<br />

contracts last year.<br />

Although railway has been <strong>the</strong> main focus under <strong>the</strong> accelerated infrastructure development<br />

program, we reckon <strong>the</strong> long-term plan is to develop new port facilities in Tianjin. The<br />

government is likely to kick start a new port project in Tianjin this year, which should benefit<br />

major port constructor, China Communications Construction (CCC). Besides, <strong>the</strong> Chinese<br />

government is also supportive on <strong>the</strong> HK-Zhuhai-Macau bridge project, which is scheduled to start<br />

by end of this year. Again, CCC, which has a strong track record in bridge construction, is<br />

expected to secure a portion of <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

Asia Cement<br />

(China) Holdings<br />

(743 HK)<br />

China<br />

Communications<br />

Construction<br />

(1800)<br />

Page 73


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK<br />

SELECTION<br />

Telecoms<br />

Neutral – Telco<br />

Services<br />

Positive –<br />

Hardware and<br />

infrastructure<br />

Property<br />

Neutral<br />

China Consumer -<br />

Food & Beverages<br />

Neutral<br />

China Consumer -<br />

Retail<br />

Neutral<br />

China Mobile (CM)’s FY08 results were in line with our and market expectations. But declines in<br />

ARPU and EBITDA margin also pointed to <strong>the</strong> difficulty CM has to face this and next year. CM<br />

raised its capex budgets to RMB130bn-RMB136bn for each of FY08-10, which would lift<br />

depreciation expenses and jeopardize profitability. The situations are not much better off for<br />

China Telecom and China Unicom. While CT is expected to suffer big loss from CDMA due to<br />

aggressive handset subsidy plan, CU’s self-borne capex on both 2G and 3G has prolonged<br />

impacts on its profitability. Hence, we have maintained our Neutral view on <strong>the</strong> sector. However,<br />

we remain positive on <strong>the</strong> sector’s long-term outlook, underpinned by <strong>the</strong> still low mobile (50%)<br />

and internet (23% penetration rates. The launches of 3G services will be driver for future ARPU<br />

expansion, which should start from 2H10. Instead, <strong>the</strong> sector valuation is on <strong>the</strong> low-end of major<br />

global telcos’ valuation, pretty much reflective of <strong>the</strong> many negatives on <strong>the</strong> sector. CM remains<br />

our sector top pick for its better earning visibility and attractive valuation.<br />

We downgraded ZTE from Buy to Hold, mainly on valuation concern. However, we remain positive<br />

on ZTE’s growth outlook and its improving fundamentals. We see high possibility to upgrade ZTE<br />

to Buy should share prices pull back to around HK$25. We have maintained our Positive view on<br />

<strong>the</strong> China telecom equipments sector. For sector picks, we have shifted our sector pick from ZTE<br />

to Comba, as we think <strong>the</strong> smaller players should deserve a new round of re-rating in <strong>the</strong> near<br />

term.<br />

Sales volume has picked up over <strong>the</strong> past three months due to policy support and aggressive price<br />

cuts. While investors are still worried about <strong>the</strong> sustainability of recent rebound in transaction<br />

volume, many investors have turned more positive and agreed with us that <strong>the</strong> outlook of <strong>the</strong><br />

sector in 2H would turn better. While we are still concerned on <strong>the</strong> impact from slowing economy<br />

on <strong>the</strong> housing market, we have turned slightly more positive on <strong>the</strong> outlook of <strong>the</strong> sector. In our<br />

view, <strong>the</strong> pick up in demand shall sustain into 2Q as developers push out more new products in<br />

this traditional high sales season. Affordability shall be fur<strong>the</strong>r improved as developers cut prices<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r. On <strong>the</strong> supply side, we foresee production volume to fall in 2009 and 2010 as developers<br />

continue to cut production volume, driven by current high inventory level. We have begun to see<br />

inventory level decline at a more meaningful pace lately. In our view, inventory is likely to drop in<br />

2H as demand continues to pick up and new supply starts to fall. We estimated asset prices will<br />

continue to fall and stabilize in 4Q. We also anticipated more M&A activities in 2H09 as asset<br />

prices bottom out, while better economic data shall improve market confidence. If <strong>the</strong>se good<br />

signs don’t happen, in <strong>the</strong> worse case scenario, we foresee a new round of new policy to be<br />

introduced from central government level to boost housing demand. In our view, <strong>the</strong> next round<br />

of new policies will be more investor-friendly, which traditionally have been proven to be more<br />

effective than mass-market focus policies. Our top picks for <strong>the</strong> sector are China Overseas Land,<br />

China Resources Land, and SOHO China.<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> F&B sector to remain a defensive choice, which offer investors some earnings<br />

resiliency at times of economic uncertainties. Relatively stable demand coupled with benefits from<br />

lower raw material costs should help drive earnings growth, with <strong>the</strong> sector expected to record<br />

c.20% average earnings growth for FY09. Among sub-segments, we expect those with<br />

discretionary demand, such as beer, would be more vulnerable to any economic downturn, hence<br />

our Cautious stance towards brewers. We are also negative on dairy company Mengniu<br />

considering <strong>the</strong> industry’s uncertainties and looming margin pressure. We prefer those involved in<br />

staple products such as China Yurun and Tingyi.<br />

As expected, total retail sales in China slowdown significantly to grow by 15.2% y-o-y in 2M09,<br />

down from 19% growth in December 2008 and 20.8% growth in November 2008. We believe<br />

operating environment for 1H09 could remain tough, especially on a high base from 1H08’s<br />

21.4% retail sales growth. At this stage, most major general retailers in China have sustained<br />

fairly steady performances from 4Q08 onwards. However, it could still be too early to draw <strong>the</strong><br />

conclusion as visibility for 2Q09 remains low. While we expect operating environment to stay<br />

challenging in <strong>the</strong> near-term, current valuations are far from demanding, prompting us to<br />

maintain our NEUTRAL view on <strong>the</strong> sector. For <strong>the</strong> full year of 2009, our economist expects CPI to<br />

stay fairly flat, and total retail sales in China to rise by 16% y-o-y to RMB12.6bn.<br />

China Mobile<br />

(941)<br />

Comba (2342)<br />

China Overseas<br />

Land (688)<br />

China Resources<br />

Land (1109)<br />

SOHO China<br />

(410)<br />

China Yurun<br />

(1068)<br />

Li Ning (2331)<br />

Page 74


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China (Cont’d)<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Industrial<br />

Transportation -<br />

Marine<br />

Cautious<br />

The recent rally in <strong>the</strong> BDI from trough does not change <strong>the</strong> gloomy earnings outlook of HK/China<br />

listed shipping companies in 2009-10, as we have yet to find solid fundamental reasons to see a<br />

sustained BDI rally at above breakeven levels for most of bulk carriers. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>re have been<br />

mixed signals from <strong>the</strong> FFA market, where <strong>the</strong> long-term forward FFA contracts are at lower<br />

rates than <strong>the</strong> near-term contracts. This reflects <strong>the</strong> persistent cautious view to <strong>the</strong> freight rate<br />

outlook in <strong>the</strong> coming 12 months. We believe <strong>the</strong> recent share price run-up to be an opportunity<br />

for investors to sell into strength. Maintain Cautious stance on <strong>the</strong> HK/China Shipping Sector.<br />

Industrial<br />

Transportation - Toll<br />

Road<br />

Positive<br />

We retain our Positive view on <strong>the</strong> China Toll Roads sector, which has done well relative to <strong>the</strong><br />

MSCI China Index in 1Q09. In particular, our BUY calls on Anhui Expressway (+17%) and Zhejiang<br />

Expressway (+13%) stood out whilst our HOLD calls on Shenzhen Expressway (-7%) and Hopewell<br />

Highway (-2%) also proved to be justified. In <strong>the</strong> mean time, we continue to like <strong>the</strong> sector for its<br />

relatively more defensive earnings profile and sustainable dividend yields, as evidenced by recent<br />

results from Anhui Expressway (60% payout) and Zhejiang Expressway (70% payout), both of<br />

which did not disappoint with <strong>the</strong>ir dividends. Our top picks are Anhui Expressway (BUY, TP<br />

HK$4.47) and Zhejiang Expressway (BUY, TP HK$5.83).<br />

Anhui Expressway<br />

(995)<br />

Zhejiang<br />

Expressway (576)<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Positive<br />

Pharmaceutical and<br />

Healthcare<br />

Positive<br />

Technology<br />

Cautious<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> weaker global economic growth, we expect fur<strong>the</strong>r negative news flow to overshadow<br />

<strong>the</strong> crude oil market until <strong>the</strong> end of 2009. Negative news will be mainly on corporate earnings,<br />

stemming from <strong>the</strong> contracted market demand, adverse effects from lower crude price to profit<br />

margins, as well as impairment loss on high-cost inventory for <strong>the</strong> next quarter. However, we<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> crude price should find strong fundamental support at US$40 a barrel, which we<br />

deem as a cycle-trough price, to motivate sizeable cut in oil output, stimulate government’s<br />

incentive to build strategic oil inventory and induce market speculation on gold / oil arbitrage. We<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> current sector’s P/BV should already provide an attractive risk / reward balance for<br />

long-term investors to accumulate <strong>the</strong> three oil majors in China.<br />

The Chinese announced a Rmb850bn three-year budget to reform <strong>the</strong> healthcare market, which<br />

should sustain <strong>the</strong> promising growth of pharmaceutical sector. The pharmaceutical industry has<br />

shown that its growth is resilient to an economic slowdown. Moreover, trading at less than 0.2x<br />

PEG and low single-digit PE, <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical sector is deeply undervalued despite concerns<br />

about low trading liquidity. Despite concerns about <strong>the</strong> small-mid cap counters being illiquid, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

distressed values and promising growth prospects justify our POSITIVE stance for <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

The knee jerk reaction to <strong>the</strong> global economic crisis was keenly felt in 4Q 2008 and <strong>the</strong> early part<br />

of 2009. Fear prevailed as orders came to a screeching halt across all areas of <strong>the</strong> technology<br />

supply chain. This means full year 4Q 2008 results as well as 1Q 2009 results are likely to be<br />

dismal. The sales outlook for <strong>the</strong> industry remains negative as both consumers and businesses will<br />

be cautious in <strong>the</strong>ir spending. We expect overall industry margins to decline on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

lowered ASPs and underutilization of capacity. Guidance from major global technology<br />

companies remains unanimously cautious, indicating a continued subdued demand. On <strong>the</strong><br />

positive side, <strong>the</strong> drastic action by customers meant that channel inventories are healthy.<br />

Stock valuations have reacted to <strong>the</strong> current situation, and have reached a low compared to past<br />

years. We believe significant downside is unlikely, as <strong>the</strong> market has digested much of <strong>the</strong><br />

negative news. This can be reflected in <strong>the</strong> lowered industry estimates, as well as companies<br />

lowering <strong>the</strong>ir capex plans and scale of operation. That being said, a significant rebound in <strong>the</strong><br />

short term is unlikely given a lack of catalysts and any improvement in fundamentals. Thus our<br />

sector view is Cautious. For exposure in this sector, we prefer leading companies such as ASM<br />

Pacific (522 HK) that are financially healthy, and will benefit from market consolidation as well as<br />

any market turnaround.<br />

Petrochina (857)<br />

Sinopec (386)<br />

Sino<br />

Biopharmaceutical<br />

(1177 )<br />

China<br />

Pharmaceutical<br />

(1093 )<br />

China Shineway<br />

(2877)<br />

ASM Pacific (522)<br />

Page 75


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

China Communications<br />

Construction<br />

Bloomberg: 1800 HK | Reuters: 1800.HK<br />

BUY HK$8.45 HSI : 13,131<br />

Price Target : 12-month HK$ 11.22<br />

Potential Catalyst: new port project<br />

Analyst<br />

Rachel Miu +852 2863 8843<br />

rachel_miu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

23.60<br />

18.60<br />

13.60<br />

8.60<br />

3.60<br />

Dec-06 Jun-07 Dec-07 Jun-08 Dec-08<br />

Relative Index<br />

China Communications Construction (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (RMB m) 2007A 2008E 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 150,601 188,012 217,145 256,550<br />

EBITDA 13,130 14,808 19,395 24,102<br />

Pre-tax Profit 9,623 9,879 12,698 16,535<br />

Net Profit 6,032 6,402 8,127 10,582<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 6,032 6,402 8,127 10,582<br />

EPS (RMB) 0.41 0.43 0.55 0.71<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.46 0.49 0.62 0.81<br />

EPS Gth (%) 39.5 6.1 26.9 30.2<br />

Diluted EPS (HK$) 0.46 0.49 0.62 0.81<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.10 0.12 0.16 0.20<br />

PE (X) 18.3 17.2 13.6 10.4<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 13.1 10.8 8.4 6.9<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 9.9 9.3 7.6 6.3<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.4<br />

P/Book Value (X) 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.7<br />

P/Book Value (X) 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 15.7 13.5 15.3 17.6<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 0.65 0.95 1.29<br />

ICB Industry: Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Construction & Materials<br />

Principal Business: The largest port construction company in China<br />

and is leveraging on its construction expertise to venture<br />

into railway line construction.<br />

369<br />

319<br />

269<br />

219<br />

169<br />

119<br />

69<br />

19<br />

Value play<br />

CCC is likely to be <strong>the</strong> key beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> mega port<br />

project in Tianjin. Also, <strong>the</strong> commencement of <strong>the</strong> HK-<br />

Zhuhai-Macau bridge project at end 2009 will be ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

earnings catalyst.<br />

Tianjin new port development. The Tianjin<br />

government is planning a large port project south of<br />

Tianjin, which should stretch over several years. CCC<br />

being <strong>the</strong> largest port constructor, should benefit from<br />

<strong>the</strong> port construction (including dredging) as well as<br />

provision of port machinery via its 47%-owned Shanghai<br />

Zhenhua Port Machinery. The local government’s<br />

growing influence on port projects is seen as positive,<br />

particularly when <strong>the</strong> overall port development is vital in<br />

rejuvenating <strong>the</strong> local industries. In addition, future port<br />

development is extended beyond containers, to include<br />

bulk, dangerous goods and o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

Major bridge project coming along. CCC is part of<br />

<strong>the</strong> consortium involved in <strong>the</strong> design of <strong>the</strong> HK-Zhuhai-<br />

Macau bridge project. We believe CCC is a strong<br />

contender for <strong>the</strong> construction role, given its past<br />

involvement in several major bridge projects in China like<br />

<strong>the</strong> Donghai Bridge (31km length) and Runyang Yangtze<br />

River Bridge (35.7km).<br />

Cheap valuation. CCC is <strong>the</strong> cheapest listed<br />

infrastructure stock on <strong>the</strong> HKEx, at 13.6x on FY09<br />

earnings. We believe <strong>the</strong> current valuation has not<br />

factored in <strong>the</strong> potential catalysts from <strong>the</strong> Tianjin port<br />

and bridge projects. Given its positive earnings outlook<br />

(with 2008-10 earnings CAGR of 29%) and potential<br />

out-performance in share price, we see <strong>the</strong> current<br />

valuation attractive. Maintain BUY and TP of HK$11.22.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital - H shares (m shs) 4,428<br />

- Non H shrs (m shs) 10,398<br />

H shs as a % of Total 30<br />

H Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 37,412 / 4,825<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

CCCG 70.13<br />

Major H Shareholders (%)<br />

Social Security Fund 9.16<br />

Barclay s PLC 7.03<br />

J P Morgan 5.99<br />

Morgan Stanley 5.25<br />

UBS AG 5.31<br />

H Shares-Free Float (%) 67.26<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 39.8<br />

Page 76<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-LM / sa- GL


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

China Communications Construction<br />

Income Statement (RMB m) Balance Sheet (RMB m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008E 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008E 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 150,601 188,012 217,145 256,550 Net Fixed Assets 26,503 34,003 35,708 37,721<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (135,033 (168,901) (194,403) (228,137 Invts in Assocs & JVs 3,592 5,703 7,506 9,427<br />

Gross Profit 15,568 19,111 22,742 28,413 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 34,553 40,809 46,378 50,593<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (4,982) (7,873) (8,335) (9,770) Cash & ST Invts 23,616 21,358 18,138 20,998<br />

Operating Profit 10,586 11,238 14,408 18,642 Inventory 5,863 8,945 9,164 10,837<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 44,782 53,087 59,947 73,599<br />

Associates & JV Inc 91 (120) (30) (4) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 28,488 32,761 37,675 41,443<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,054) (1,238) (1,679) (2,104) Total Assets 167,397 196,666 214,516 244,618<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 9,623 9,879 12,698 16,535 ST Debt 21,828 24,011 26,412 29,053<br />

Tax (2,049) (1,877) (2,540) (3,307) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 71,758 89,704 94,600 109,483<br />

Minority Interest (1,542) (1,600) (2,032) (2,646) LT Debt 12,633 14,528 15,981 17,579<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 7,216 7,706 8,277 8,674<br />

Net Profit 6,032 6,402 8,127 10,582 Shareholder’s Equity 45,145 49,946 56,042 63,978<br />

Net Profit before Except. 6,032 6,402 8,127 10,582 Minority Interests 8,817 10,771 13,205 15,851<br />

EBITDA 13,130 14,808 19,395 24,102 Total Cap. & Liab. 167,397 196,666 214,516 244,618<br />

Sales Gth (%) 31.1 24.8 15.5 18.1 Non-Cash Wkg. Cap 7,375 5,089 12,187 16,396<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 50.8 12.8 31.0 24.3 Net Cash/(Debt) (10,845) (17,181) (24,255) (25,634)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 63.2 6.2 28.2 29.4<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 88.6 6.1 26.9 30.2<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 21.3 19.0 20.0 20.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RMB m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008E 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008E 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 9,623 9,879 12,698 16,535 Gross Margins (%) 10.3 10.2 10.5 11.1<br />

Dep. & Amort. 2,453 3,691 5,018 5,463 Opg Profit Margin (%) 7.0 6.0 6.6 7.3<br />

Tax Paid (1,094) (1,542) (1,600) (2,032) Net Profit Margin (%) 4.0 3.4 3.7 4.1<br />

(Pft)/ Loss on disposal of FAs (418) 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 15.7 13.5 15.3 17.6<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (91) 120 30 4 ROA (%) 4.1 3.5 4.0 4.6<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (7,813) 1,475 (8,595) (5,952) ROCE (%) 9.9 9.0 10.2 11.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (1,063) (1,112) (1,053) (1,313) Div Payout Ratio (%) 21.6 25.0 25.0 25.0<br />

Net Operating CF 1,597 12,510 6,499 12,705 Net Interest Cover (x) 10.0 9.1 8.6 8.9<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (9,067) (10,974) (6,369) (6,711) Asset Turnover (x) 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (1) (1,662) (1,828) (1,006) Debtors Turn (avg days) 94.0 95.0 95.0 95.0<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (1,533) (2,226) (1,830) (1,920) Creditors Turn (avg days) 148.0 155.4 154.0 143.4<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 217 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 13.6 16.4 17.5 16.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF (5,172) (3,830) (3,325) (4,179) Current Ratio (x) 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1<br />

Net Investing CF (15,556) (18,692) (13,353) (13,815) Quick Ratio (x) 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7<br />

Div Paid (1,021) 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 4,099 4,078 3,854 4,239 Capex to Debt (%) 26.3 28.5 15.0 14.4<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Z-Score (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 2,561 (225) (302) (332) N.Cash/(Debt)PS (RMB) (0.8) (1.3) (1.9) (2.0)<br />

Net Financing CF 5,639 3,853 3,552 3,907 Opg CFPS (RMB) 0.72 0.84 1.16 1.43<br />

Net Cashflow (8,320) (2,329) (3,302) 2,797 Free CFPS (RMB) (0.57) 0.12 0.01 0.46<br />

Interim Income Statement (RMB m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown<br />

FY Dec 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 2H2008 FY Dec 2007A 2008E 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 58,674 91,927 75,749 112,263 Revenues (RMB m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (52,200) (82,833) (68,289) (100,612 Construction 100,452 125,753 144,754 170,998<br />

Gross Profit 6,474 9,094 7,460 11,651 Design 6,434 7,474 8,380 9,648<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (1,681) (3,301) (3,286) (4,587) Dredging 14,259 18,537 21,321 25,172<br />

Operating Profit 4,793 5,793 4,174 7,064 Port Machinery 22,694 27,396 31,573 37,356<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>rs 6,762 8,852 11,116 13,377<br />

Associates & JV Inc 45 46 (89) (31) Total 150,601 188,012 217,145 256,550<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (413) (641) (530) (708) Gross Profit (RMB m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Construction 7,303 9,535 10,965 13,456<br />

Pre-tax Profit 4,425 5,198 3,555 6,324 Design 1,792 1,687 2,061 2,567<br />

Tax (974) (1,075) (694) (1,183) Dredging 2,570 2,649 3,481 4,621<br />

Minority Interest (707) (835) (661) (939) Port Machinery 3,343 4,138 5,086 6,389<br />

Net Profit 2,744 3,288 2,200 4,202 O<strong>the</strong>rs 560 1,103 1,149 1,379<br />

Net profit bef Except. 2,744 3,288 2,200 4,202 Total 15,568 19,111 22,742 28,413<br />

EBITDA 5,914 7,216 5,590 9,218 Gross Profit Margins (%)<br />

Construction 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.8<br />

Sales Gth (%) 24.3 35.8 29.1 22.1 Design 27.1 22.0 24.0 26.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 64.6 41.1 (5.5) 27.7 Dredging 17.7 14.0 16.0 18.0<br />

Opg Profit Gth 90.4 45.9 (12.9) 21.9 Port Machinery 14.7 15.1 16.1 17.1<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 153.1 55.5 (19.8) 27.8 O<strong>the</strong>rs 7.8 12.0 10.0 10.0<br />

Gross Margins (%) 11.0 9.9 9.8 10.4 Total 10.3 10.2 10.5 11.1<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 8.2 6.3 5.5 6.3<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 4.7 3.6 2.9 3.7<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 77


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

China Mobile<br />

Bloomberg: 941 HK | Reuters: 0941.HK<br />

BUY HK$66.70 HSI : 13,131<br />

Price Target : 12-month HK$83.0<br />

Potential Catalyst: Progress in TD-SCDMA development, faster-thanexpected<br />

increase in TD-SCDMA users.<br />

Analyst<br />

Steven Liu CFA, +852 2971 1780<br />

steven_liu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

163<br />

143<br />

123<br />

103<br />

83<br />

63<br />

43<br />

HK$<br />

Relative Index<br />

23<br />

89<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

China Mobile (LHS) R elative H SI IN D EX (R H S)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (RMB bn) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 357 412 458 500<br />

EBITDA 194 217 240 262<br />

Pre-tax Profit 129 150 163 178<br />

Net Profit 87 113 124 136<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 87 113 124 136<br />

EPS (RMB) 4.35 5.63 6.15 6.70<br />

EPS (HK$) 4.94 6.39 6.98 7.61<br />

EPS Gth (%) 31.1 29.3 9.3 9.0<br />

Diluted EPS (HK$) 4.86 6.29 6.87 7.49<br />

DPS (HK$) 2.26 2.73 3.05 3.34<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 21.18 24.02 28.37 33.04<br />

PE (X) 13.5 10.4 9.6 8.8<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 7.6 6.4 5.8 5.3<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 5.1 4.6 4.0 3.5<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 3.4 4.1 4.6 5.0<br />

P/Book Value (X) 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.0<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 25.1 28.2 26.7 24.8<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 6.82 7.20<br />

ICB Industry: Telecommunications<br />

ICB Sector: Mobile Telecommunications<br />

Principal Business: Leading mobile services provider in Mainland<br />

China<br />

289<br />

239<br />

189<br />

139<br />

Fundamentals remain solid<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> three telcos in China, CM offers <strong>the</strong> best nearterm<br />

earnings visibility. Its fundamentals remain solid,<br />

evidenced by its unrivaled 2G/2.5G network coverage and<br />

RMB180bn net cash. Backed by <strong>the</strong> government, we<br />

remain optimistic about CM’s TD-SCDMA endeavor.<br />

Lowered forecasts. CM has less than 400,000 TD-SCDMA<br />

users currently, and is targeting 30m users in three years’<br />

time. The TD-SCDMA based 3G voice tariffs are similar to its<br />

2G voice tariffs, while 3G data services are still in <strong>the</strong> early<br />

stage. We estimate revenue contribution from TD-SCDMA,<br />

net of lease fee and handsets subsidy, at less than 1% by<br />

2010. Instead, CM’s higher capex budget (RMB130bn-<br />

RMB136bn for FY09-10) and opex will eat into its bottom<br />

lines in <strong>the</strong> next few years. Though we recently lowered our<br />

forecasts to include 3G assumptions, we see upward<br />

revision potential from faster-than-expect progress in <strong>the</strong><br />

TD-SCDMA.<br />

Fundamentals remain solid. Despite <strong>the</strong> gloomy nearterm<br />

outlook, CM’s earning visibility remains <strong>the</strong> best<br />

among <strong>the</strong> three China telcos. Besides, its unrivaled<br />

network coverage and dominance in <strong>the</strong> rural market is<br />

least threatened by <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two telcos in <strong>the</strong> foreseeable<br />

near future. With strong government support, CM has a<br />

winning edge with its TD-SCDMA endeavor. Its strong<br />

financial position (RMB180bn net cash as at Dec08) and<br />

strong R&D ability give it leeway in this rapid-evolving<br />

global telecoms market (like its self-launched Fetion mobile<br />

IM platform, and to-be-launched ‘Ophone’).<br />

Undemanding valuation. We have maintained our<br />

forecasts and target price at HK$83.0. Looking ahead, we<br />

expect CM to be more aggressive in its TD-SCDMA efforts,<br />

including platform, terminals and contents, etc. This could<br />

be a share price catalyst. The counter is trading at 9.6x<br />

FY09F PE, which is undemanding relative to major global<br />

peers’ valuations. Maintain BUY.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 20,055<br />

Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 1,337,672 / 172,596<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

China Mobile (HK) Group 74.28<br />

Free Float (%) 25.72<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 22.7<br />

Page 78<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa- RM


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

China Mobile<br />

Income Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (RMB bn)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 357 412 458 500 Net Fixed Assets 257 323 372 410<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (233) (270) (300) (329) Invts in Assocs & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 124 143 157 171 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 99 94 94 93<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc 3 3 2 2 Cash & ST Invts 189 193 236 298<br />

Operating Profit 127 145 160 174 Inventory 3 4 4 5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 10 11 12 13<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 6 7 7 8<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 2 4 3 5 Total Assets 563 632 725 828<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 129 150 163 178 ST Debt 2 2 2 2<br />

Tax (42) (37) (39) (42) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 153 169 184 201<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 LT Debt 10 10 10 10<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 24 24 24 24<br />

Net Profit 87 113 124 136 Shareholder’s Equity 374 426 505 589<br />

Net Profit before Except. 87 113 124 136 Minority Interests 0 1 1 1<br />

EBITDA 194 217 240 262 Total Cap. & Liab. 563 632 725 828<br />

Sales Gth (%) 20.9 15.5 11.0 9.3 Non-Cash Wkg. Cap (134) (148) (160) (175)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 21.8 11.5 10.6 9.1 Net Cash/(Debt) 177 182 224 286<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 33.6 14.4 10.0 8.7<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 31.9 29.6 10.0 9.3<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 32.5 24.6 23.8 23.8<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 129 150 163 178 Gross Margins (%) 34.8 34.6 34.4 34.3<br />

Dep. & Amort. 68 72 80 88 Opg Profit Margin (%) 35.6 35.2 34.9 34.7<br />

Tax Paid (36) (37) (39) (42) Net Profit Margin (%) 24.4 27.4 27.1 27.1<br />

(Pft)/ Loss on disposal of FAs 3 4 5 5 ROAE (%) 25.1 28.2 26.7 24.8<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 0 0 0 0 ROA (%) 16.5 18.9 18.3 17.5<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 2 14 12 15 ROCE (%) 22.3 25.1 24.2 22.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 2 (3) (2) (3) Div Payout Ratio (%) 45.8 42.9 43.8 44.0<br />

Net Operating CF 169 198 219 241 Net Interest Cover (x) NM NM NM NM<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (99) (136) (134) (131) Asset Turnover (x) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 10.0 9.4 9.3 9.3<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 133.6 124.8 126.3 130.6<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 6.9 6.5 6.7 6.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 3 6 5 6 Current Ratio (x) 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6<br />

Net Investing CF (96) (130) (129) (125) Quick Ratio (x) 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.5<br />

Div Paid (34) (63) (48) (54) Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (3) 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 829.8 1,147.6 1,127.1 1,102.5<br />

Capital Issues 2 2 2 2 Z-Score (X) 6.8 (24.9) (20.8) (17.3)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (2) (2) (2) (2) N.Cash/(Debt)PS (RMB) 10.0 10.2 12.6 16.0<br />

Net Financing CF (38) (63) (48) (54) Opg CFPS (RMB) 9.46 10.5 11.6 12.7<br />

Net Cashflow 35 5 42 63 Free CFPS (RMB) 3.98 3.52 4.81 6.18<br />

Interim Income Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Segmental Breakdown<br />

FY Dec 2H2006 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 158 167 190 196 Revenues (RMB m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (108) (113) (120) (127) Voice business 265 299 325 347<br />

Gross Profit 50 54 71 70 SMS 42 50 56 61<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc 1 2 1 1 Non SMS data 30 41 53 67<br />

Operating Profit 51 55 72 71 Voice VAS 19 22 24 26<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0 Total 357 412 458 500<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 1 1 1 2<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 52 56 73 73<br />

Tax (16) (18) (24) (18)<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 36 38 49 55<br />

Net profit bef Except. 36 38 49 55<br />

EBITDA 81 90 104 104<br />

Sales Gth (%) 23.3 21.6 20.2 17.9<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 14.1 14.7 28.6 16.1<br />

Opg Profit Gth 20.2 25.4 40.7 29.2<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 21.5 25.7 37.1 44.7<br />

Gross Margins (%) 31.6 32.1 37.1 35.6<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 32.3 33.0 37.8 36.2<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 22.6 22.8 25.8 27.9<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 79


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

HSBC<br />

Bloomberg: 5 HK | Reuters: 0005.HK<br />

SELL HK$41.50 HSI : 13,131<br />

Price Target : 12-Month HK$25.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Any financial crisis in Eastern & Central Europe, and<br />

volatility in <strong>the</strong> global banking system<br />

Analyst<br />

Jasmine Lai · +852 2971 1926 ·<br />

jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

149.70<br />

129.70<br />

109.70<br />

89.70<br />

69.70<br />

49.70<br />

29.70<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Relative<br />

Index<br />

HSBC Holdings (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (US$m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 39,951 43,147 42,459 43,945<br />

Pre-prov. Profit Gth (%) 25.6 8.0 -1.6 3.5<br />

Pretax Profit 24,212 9,307 10,112 12,548<br />

Net Profit 19,133 5,728 6,645 8,265<br />

EPS (HK$) 12.80 3.64 3.31 3.68<br />

EPS Gth (%) 17.8 (71.5) (9.1) 11.2<br />

PE (x) 3.2 11.4 12.5 11.3<br />

DPS (HK$) 7.02 5.00 2.18 2.22<br />

Div Yield (%) 16.9 12.0 5.3 5.4<br />

Book Value (HK$) 84.0 60.0 44.7 45.8<br />

P/Book Value (x) 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9<br />

ROE (%) 16.2 5.2 6.9 8.2<br />

ROE (ex exceptional) (%) 16.2 14.7 10.9 11.4<br />

ROA (%) 0.91 0.23 0.25 0.29<br />

- Earnings Rev (%)<br />

- -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$) 4.01 4.78<br />

228<br />

178<br />

128<br />

78<br />

28<br />

Broken hearts<br />

We have cut our 2009 book value forecast by 14%, and<br />

2009-10 net profit forecasts by 16% and 31% respectively.<br />

HSBC’s book value remains highly vulnerable to fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM<br />

losses on securities and continued drag from HSBC Finance.<br />

Our 12-month target price is cut to HK$25.0 (from HK$40.0),<br />

based on 0.56x Mar-10 book.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r provision on HSBC Finance & MTM losses. HSBC<br />

still have US$272bn in exposure to relatively risky securities.<br />

Besides, <strong>the</strong> run-off loan portfolio at HSBC Finance remains<br />

high at US$100bn and it will continue its credit card business<br />

which still has US$46.6bn receivables outstanding. These<br />

exposures are very high compared with US$94bn in book<br />

value as at Dec-08. The fact that HSBC’s book value shrank<br />

27% in 2008 highlighted that it is susceptible to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

deepening of global financial tsunami. For every 10% MTM<br />

loss on its US$272bn investment securities and 10%<br />

provisioning on <strong>the</strong> US$100bn run-off portfolio, it would<br />

result in US$37.2bn (or 40%) reduction in book value which<br />

is equivalent to more than double <strong>the</strong> rights issue size of<br />

US$17.7bn.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r goodwill impairment on HSBC Finance. We<br />

estimate <strong>the</strong> fair value of HSBC Finance should be negative<br />

US$9.3bn. This toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> US$14.1bn acquisition cost<br />

means that impairment on HSBC Finance could reach c.<br />

US$23.4bn ultimately. Given HSBC has already made<br />

US$10.6bn goodwill impairment in 2008, we expect fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

impairment of US$12.9bn on HSBC Finance over <strong>the</strong> next five<br />

years (i.e. when <strong>the</strong> non-core loan portfolio probably fully run<br />

off by 2013). The negative P/L impact would <strong>the</strong>refore fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reduce its book value in future.<br />

Being marginalized. With more banks being nationalized or<br />

receiving capital injection from governments, privately owned<br />

banks like HSBC may be marginalized and it may need to<br />

maintain an above-peers’ CAR. We project its tier I CAR to fall<br />

back to 8.3% as at Dec-09 (Dec-08 proforma after rights<br />

issue: 9.8%; Dec-07: 8.3%), which is slightly below <strong>the</strong><br />

median of its target range of 7.5-10%. Hence, fur<strong>the</strong>r fundraising<br />

need cannot be ruled out.<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector : Banks<br />

Principal Business: HSBC Holdings plc is <strong>the</strong> holding company for<br />

<strong>the</strong> HSBC Group. The Company provides a variety of international<br />

banking and financial services, including retail and corporate<br />

banking, trade, trusteeship, securities, custody, capital markets,<br />

treasury, private and investment banking, and insurance. The Group<br />

operates worldwide.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 17,205<br />

Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 714,000 / 92,086<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

No Substantial Shareholder<br />

Free Float (%) 100.00<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 42.6<br />

Page 80<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

Sa-GL


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

HSBC<br />

Income Statement (US$m)<br />

Income Statement (YoY%)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Net interest income 37,795 42,563 41,143 40,135<br />

Non-interest income 41,198 39,119 36,547 38,262<br />

Operating income 78,993 81,682 77,690 78,397<br />

Operating expenses (39,042) (38,535) (35,231) (34,452)<br />

Pre-provision profit 39,951 43,147 42,459 43,945<br />

Provision charge (17,242) (24,937) (29,950) (29,505)<br />

Associates 1,503 1,661 1,467 1,329<br />

Excep. (Impairment on<br />

HI)<br />

0 (10,564) (3,864) (3,220)<br />

Profit before tax 24,212 9,307 10,112 12,548<br />

Taxation & MI (5,079) (3,579) (3,467) (4,283)<br />

Attributable profit 19,133 5,728 6,645 8,265<br />

Core earnings 19,133 16,292 10,509 11,486<br />

PBT & Loan breakdown by geography (US$m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Net interest income 9.6% 12.6% -3.3% -2.5%<br />

Non-interest income 33.4% -5.0% -6.6% 4.7%<br />

Operating income 20.8% 3.4% -4.9% 0.9%<br />

Operating expenses 16.4% -1.3% -8.6% -2.2%<br />

Pre-provision profit 25.6% 8.0% -1.6% 3.5%<br />

Provision charge 63.1% 44.6% 20.1% -1.5%<br />

Profit before tax 9.6% -61.6% 8.7% 24.1%<br />

Attributable profit 21.2% -70.1% 16.0% 24.4%<br />

Core earnings 21.2% -70.1% 16.0% 24.4%<br />

Key financial ratio<br />

2008 2009F 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

(As %<br />

(As % (YoY<br />

Net cust loans (YoY%) 13.0 (5.0) (4.9) (2.7)<br />

(US$m) Total) (YoY%) (US$m) Total) %) Non-interest income ratio 52.2 47.9 47.0 48.8<br />

Pre-tax profit breakdown<br />

Cost-to-income ratio 49.4 47.2 45.3 43.9<br />

Europe 10,869 117% 26% 7,907 78% -27% Prov charge / Avg loans 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.4<br />

North America (15,528) -167% -17164% (9,087) -90% -41% Effective tax rate 15.5 30.2 25.0 25.0<br />

Hong Kong 5,461 59% -26% 4,468 44% -18% Dividend payout (%) 55.5 134.5 72.6 60.0<br />

Rest of Asia 6,468 69% 8% 5,618 56% -13% ROE 16.2 5.2 6.9 8.2<br />

Latin America 2,037 22% -6% 1,207 12% -41% ROE (ex exceptional) 16.2 14.7 10.9 11.4<br />

TOTAL 9,307 100% -62% 10,112 100% 9% ROA 0.91 0.23 0.25 0.29<br />

Loan breakdown<br />

Europe 426,191 46% -6% 409,143 46% -4%<br />

Hong Kong 100,220 11% 12% 97,715 11% -3%<br />

Rest of Asia 107,956 12% 6% 113,354 13% 5%<br />

North America 256,214 27% -12% 225,468 25% -12%<br />

Latin America 42,287 5% -12% 41,018 5% -3%<br />

TOTAL 932,868 100% -5% 886,698 100% -5%<br />

Interim Income Statement (US$m)<br />

Rolling P/B chart (x)<br />

1H07 2H07 1H08 2H08<br />

P&L items:<br />

Net interest income 18,230 19,565 21,178 21,385<br />

Non-interest income 20,263 20,935 18,297 20,822<br />

Operating income 38,493 40,500 39,475 42,207<br />

Operating expenses (18,611) (20,431) (20,140) (18,395)<br />

Pre-provision profit 19,882 20,069 19,335 23,812<br />

Prov. & o<strong>the</strong>r (6,346) (10,896) (10,058) (14,879)<br />

Associates 623 880 970 691<br />

Excep. (Impairment on<br />

HI) 0 0 0 (10,564)<br />

Profit before tax 14,159 10,053 10,247 (940)<br />

Taxation & MI (3,264) (1,815) (2,525) (1,054)<br />

Attributable profit 10,895 8,238 7,722 (1,994)<br />

x %<br />

4.0<br />

25<br />

3.5<br />

Current = 0.92x<br />

3.0<br />

20<br />

2.5<br />

15<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

10<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.68<br />

5<br />

0.0<br />

0<br />

Jan-95<br />

Jan-97<br />

Jan-99<br />

P/B<br />

Jan-01<br />

Jan-03<br />

Jan-05<br />

Jan-07<br />

ROE<br />

Jan-09<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 81


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Malaysia<br />

Value hunting<br />

KLCI Current : 852.18<br />

KLCI 3 /12 mths Target<br />

Expected Return<br />

:<br />

:<br />

800 / 900<br />

-6% / +6%<br />

By end-March 2009, <strong>the</strong> KLCI would have seen a<br />

downtrend stretching five quarters, close to 1997/98’s<br />

five and half quarters. In our view, fur<strong>the</strong>r market dips<br />

are likely in <strong>the</strong> near term, but for stocks that have<br />

experienced early capitulation, <strong>the</strong>re should be relatively<br />

less downside. We see value in selected stocks following<br />

indiscriminate selldowns. We also like defensive plays<br />

that provide attractive yields.<br />

We expect GDP to contract over <strong>the</strong> next three quarters and 2009 GDP<br />

contraction of -1.2%. Earnings are still on <strong>the</strong> downtrend. Our forecast is for<br />

earnings in our stock universe to fall 8.3% this year. That said, we believe<br />

Malaysia is on a stronger footing compared to <strong>the</strong> Asian crisis. Given <strong>the</strong> pressure<br />

on near term growth, we believe <strong>the</strong> government is likely to accelerate <strong>the</strong> pumppriming<br />

that will help revive fortunes in <strong>the</strong> construction industry, where our top<br />

pick is IJM Corp.<br />

We are keen on:- (i) defensive stocks such as PLUS, Litrak, YTL Power, Public Bank,<br />

KLCCP where yields are sustained by resilient cash flows with good visibility,<br />

utility-type business models and/or superior asset quality; and (ii) oversold/value<br />

stocks including Resorts, Genting, IJM Corp, MAHB, AMMB and EON Capital.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>re may still be downside to earnings in some cases, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

bad news for <strong>the</strong>se stocks are in <strong>the</strong> price. Our top sells/FVs are Sime Darby<br />

(expensive), BCHB (weak capital markets) and Bursa Malaysia (high valuations).<br />

Wong Ming Tek (603) 2711 0956 mingtek@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Malaysia <strong>Research</strong> Team<br />

Page 82<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SCG / sa: TW


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Indices Closed Chg Net -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth -12 mth 52-Week<br />

-1 mth (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

KLCI 852 (47) (5) (3) (17) (28) 1,301 829<br />

KLCON Index 163 (5) (3) (1) (9) (28) 247 135<br />

KLCSU Index 280 (4) (1) 0 (3) (8) 338 262<br />

KLFIN Index 6,315 (817) (11) (7) (24) (31) 10,058 6,136<br />

KLIND Index 2,054 (59) (3) (2) (7) (17) 2,741 1,995<br />

KLPRO Index 64 (3) (4) (5) (23) (30) 109 64<br />

KLPLN Index 4,386 (6) (0) 6 (9) (35) 8,034 3,119<br />

KLPRP Index 500 (39) (7) (3) (20) (31) 824 495<br />

KLSER Index 114 (5) (4) (3) (18) (26) 172 112<br />

KLTEC Index 12 (2) (12) (13) (33) (45) 23 12<br />

FBM2B Index 3,835 (167) (4) (4) (23) (33) 5,965 3,794<br />

FBMSC Index 6,093 (530) (8) (8) (25) (36) 10,874 6,024<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (billion) 20<br />

Value (RM billion) 30<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Market Review<br />

The KLCI greeted <strong>the</strong> New Year positively with a bounce to<br />

hit a recent high of 927 points in January, but subsequently<br />

spiralled downwards to 852 pts (-4.6%). This was largely on<br />

poor investor sentiments in a weak economic environment.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> quarter, Bank Negara Malaysia cut its benchmark<br />

interest rate twice. The first was in January, when <strong>the</strong><br />

Overnight Policy Rate (OPR) was reduced by 75 bps to 2.5%,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> Statutory Reserve Requirement (SRR) for banks was<br />

lowered to 2%, from 3.5%. In February, <strong>the</strong> bank fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

slashed <strong>the</strong> OPR by 50 bps to 2%, and <strong>the</strong> SRR from 2% to<br />

1%.<br />

In March, Deputy Prime Minister Dato Sri Najib Tun Razak<br />

tabled <strong>the</strong> second stimulus package valued at RM60b over a<br />

two year period, raising <strong>the</strong> government budget deficit to<br />

7.6% from 4.8% of GDP. The headline number of RM60b<br />

over two years was on <strong>the</strong> higher end of expectations. It<br />

included measures to stimulate domestic demand<br />

(acceleration of 9MP construction projects) and cushion<br />

effects of economic slowdown (reducing unemployment).<br />

The official government GDP growth forecast has been<br />

lowered to between +1 and -1% (from 3.5%).<br />

The Industrial Production Index (IPI) for Dec 2008 dropped<br />

15.6% y-o-y, after slipping 8.2% (revised) in November.<br />

Malaysia’s exports in January slid 27.8% y-o-y to RM38.3b<br />

as electrical and electronic and crude petroleum exports fell.<br />

Total imports fell 32% y-o-y to RM29.47b.<br />

The ruling coalition Barisan Nasional (BN) took over <strong>the</strong> Perak<br />

state administration after gaining <strong>the</strong> support of four<br />

opposition assemblymen.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> corporate front, both TM International Bhd (TMI) and<br />

Maybank announced plans to raise RM5.25b and RM6b,<br />

respectively via rights issues to lower <strong>the</strong>ir total debts. Both<br />

large caps saw heavy selldowns before regaining some<br />

ground. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> 4Q08 results season saw 30% of<br />

companies in our universe report disappointing earnings.<br />

This percentage remains relatively high, although lower than<br />

3Q08’s 34%.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> quarter, crude oil prices gained 7% to USD52 per<br />

barrel. Malaysian crude palm oil futures followed this trend<br />

and rose 13% to RM1,911/MT. The Ringgit weakened<br />

against <strong>the</strong> US dollar, losing 5% at <strong>the</strong> end of 1Q09 at<br />

RM3.653/USD.<br />

The country’s latest trade figures showed that <strong>the</strong> current<br />

economic downturn could be more severe than anticipated.<br />

Page 83


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Kuala Lumpur Composite Index key events<br />

1600<br />

1500<br />

1400<br />

1300<br />

J un 08<br />

4 - Subsidies revamp<br />

18 - SAPP's vote of no<br />

confidence agst PM<br />

26 - 9MP mid-term review<br />

29 - Anwar Ibrahim's<br />

sodomy case no.2<br />

Jul 08<br />

10 - PM to hand over<br />

power to Najib in 2010<br />

Aug 08<br />

23 - Fuel prices reduced<br />

28 - Anwar sworn in as MP<br />

29 - Budget 2009<br />

Sep 08<br />

11 - IPP windfall tax changed<br />

for 1 year only<br />

12 - 3 ISA arrests<br />

15 - Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

bankrupt, while Merrill Lynch<br />

sold to Bank of America<br />

16 - Congressional leaders<br />

proposed US$700b allocation<br />

to buy bad assets of troubled<br />

banks<br />

Oct 08<br />

8 - PM announced resignation<br />

in Mar 09<br />

11 - Koh Tsu Koon became<br />

Gerakan president after<br />

winning uncontested<br />

15 - Hindraf banned<br />

19 - MCA party election<br />

Nov 08<br />

2 - Deputy PM won <strong>the</strong> Umno<br />

president post uncontested<br />

4 - RM7b stimulus package<br />

announced<br />

25 - Bank Negara cuts OPR to<br />

3.25%<br />

Dec 08<br />

3 - Zaid Ibrahim sacked from<br />

Umno<br />

J an 09<br />

9 - BNM cuts OPR to 2.5%<br />

17 - PAS won T'ganu byelection<br />

F eb 09<br />

6 - BN took over Perak<br />

11 - Power tariff revised<br />

18 - Perak MB and<br />

assemblymen suspended<br />

23 - Govt vetoed East@Labu<br />

airport<br />

24 - BNM cuts OPR to 2.0%<br />

27 - Toll hike defered<br />

Mar 09<br />

3 - Perak's PKR held emergency<br />

sitting under a tree<br />

5 - Anwar's sodomy trial<br />

transferred to High Court<br />

10 - RM60b 2nd stimulus<br />

package unveiled<br />

24 - UMNO General Assembly<br />

Index pts<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 J un-08 J ul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 J an-09 Feb-09 Mar-09<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Fifth quarter of market decline; GDP growth trending down<br />

The current downtrend would have stretched close to five<br />

quarters by end March 2009. The benchmark KLCI has lost<br />

44% from its all-time high of 1,516 points on 11 Jan 2008<br />

to current levels of 852 points. This is <strong>the</strong> third longest<br />

downtrend over <strong>the</strong> last 30 years. The more recent 1998<br />

Asian Financial Crisis saw a stock market decline of 79%<br />

over 5.5 quarters.<br />

In quarterly GDP terms, we have seen slower growth in <strong>the</strong><br />

last three quarters compared to 1Q08’s 7.4% growth. <strong>DBS</strong><br />

expects quarterly GDP to deteriorate and contract y-o-y in<br />

<strong>the</strong> coming three quarters (1Q-3Q09) with 2009 GDP<br />

contraction of -1.2% (from 2008’s +4.6%). This is on <strong>the</strong><br />

back of weaker manufacturing sales. Despite <strong>the</strong> weak<br />

outlook in <strong>the</strong> coming quarters, we believe Malaysia is on a<br />

much stronger footing compared to <strong>the</strong> Asian Financial<br />

Crisis period, when GDP contracted 7.4% in 1998.<br />

Expect GDP contraction this year<br />

MY R mn<br />

% Y oY<br />

GDP<br />

170000<br />

10<br />

GDP growth<br />

150000<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> f 8<br />

6<br />

130000<br />

4<br />

110000<br />

2<br />

90000<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

70000<br />

-4<br />

50000<br />

-6<br />

Mar- 05 Mar- 06 Mar- 07 Mar- 08 Mar- 09<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Page 84


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Growth<br />

On a slippery slope. Earnings are still on a downtrend. Our<br />

universe earnings fell 38% y-o-y and 9% q-o-q in 4Q08. This is<br />

a smaller drop compared to 3Q08 earnings, which fell 29% y-oy<br />

and 30% q-o-q. We saw: (i) declining commodity prices<br />

squeeze Plantation and <strong>the</strong> Steel sectors, which booked higher<br />

provisions q-o-q. Sime Darby accounted for <strong>the</strong> largest absolute<br />

drop in net profit q-o-q (down 68% to RM278.5m for 4Q08 vs<br />

RM867.0m in 3Q08) on significantly weaker plantation earnings<br />

and weaker property and industrial divisions; and (ii) lumpy<br />

recognition of impairment on investments (Resorts), FX losses<br />

(IOI, Sime), and unwinding of fuel hedging contracts (AirAsia).<br />

Relatively high percentage of disappointments. In <strong>the</strong> recent<br />

4Q08 results season, <strong>the</strong> proportion of companies that reported<br />

disappointing earnings were still relatively high at 30% although<br />

lower than 3Q08’s 34%. Several large caps disappointed. This<br />

included IOI Corp (realized and unrealized FX losses), TMI (weak<br />

Rupiah, FX losses and lumpy provisions), KL Kepong (investment<br />

and inventory write-down), AirAsia (unwinding of fuel hedging<br />

contracts and interest rate swaps), and MISC (liner losses).<br />

Earnings still on downtrend<br />

(RMm)<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

-<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r downward revision. Since <strong>the</strong> last quarter, our 2008<br />

universe earnings growth is lowered by 5.1%. Meanwhile, 2009<br />

earnings are cut by ano<strong>the</strong>r 4.7%. The biggest cuts were in<br />

Plantation (lower resource-based manufacturing margins, FX<br />

losses), Telecommunications (weak rupiah and slower revenue<br />

growth), Steel (lower prices and volume), Financials (lower loan<br />

growth, NII, higher provisions) and Oil & Gas (slower new order<br />

flows, lower margins).<br />

Lower y-o-y net profit performance<br />

(RMm) 4Q07 3Q08 4Q08 % chg<br />

y-o-y<br />

% chg<br />

q-o-q<br />

Banking 2,483 2,532 2,498 1 -1<br />

Non-bank financial 50 20 14 -73 -33<br />

Consumer 228 320 215 -6 -33<br />

Manufacturing 185 214 202 9 -6<br />

Motor 188 245 57 -70 -75<br />

Oil & Gas 118 178 167 42 -3<br />

Conglomerate 907 1,074 573 -37 -47<br />

Construction 437 322 154 -65 -52<br />

Concessionaires 417 267 320 -23 20<br />

Gaming 1,080 529 937 -13 16<br />

Plantation 1,111 763 509 -54 -35<br />

Power 1,518 -103 711 -53 307<br />

Property 315 183 226 -28 24<br />

Telecommunication 1,039 338 405 -61 20<br />

Transportation 875 286 69 -92 -73<br />

Total 10,983 6,887 6,806 -38 -8<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Weaker operating cashflows. In terms of operating cashflow,<br />

<strong>the</strong> motor industry saw a sharp q-o-q contraction, as earnings<br />

fell and inventories rose (Proton, UMW). Sime Darby’s operating<br />

cashflow deteriorated following an abrupt surge in inventories,<br />

likely car and downstream palm oil inventories. Sectors with<br />

relatively strong cashflows for <strong>the</strong> quarter include<br />

Telecommunications (better collection at Telekom), Gaming<br />

(resilient cashflow from Genting & Resorts), and Plantation<br />

(lower inventory for IOI).<br />

Weaker operating cashflow<br />

(RMm) 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 % chg<br />

q-o-q<br />

Non-bank financial (346) 334 (146) -143.6<br />

Consumer 131 502 575 14.6<br />

Manufacturing (162) (207) 364 -276.2<br />

Motor 862 746 (66) -108.8<br />

Oil & Gas 485 (292) 233 -179.8<br />

Conglomerate 2,084 (193) (626) 224.1<br />

Construction 287 217 56 -74.2<br />

Concessionaires 545 461 585 26.8<br />

Gaming 1,495 1,786 1,351 -24.4<br />

Plantation 889 947 1,547 63.3<br />

Power 1,300 2,731 786 -71.2<br />

Property 477 240 288 20.0<br />

Telecommunication 1,232 1,427 2,454 72.0<br />

Transportation 1,667 458 582 27.0<br />

Total 11,002 9,199 7,970 -13.4<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 85


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings contraction this year. Following our earnings eursion,<br />

we expect 8.3% earnings contraction in 2009. The key drag on<br />

earnings will come from Plantation and Conglomerates (Sime<br />

Darby and PPB Group), on lower CPO price assumptions. We<br />

also expect weaker earnings for Banking (due mainly to weaker<br />

non-interest income), and Manufacturing (lower steel prices).<br />

Below consensus. Comparing our 2009 net profit forecast for<br />

each company against consensus, <strong>the</strong> sum of our universe profit<br />

is 11% below consensus. This indicates that our forecasts is<br />

relatively more conservative. Although our forecasts are broadly<br />

lower across most sectors, <strong>the</strong> biggest variances are from <strong>the</strong><br />

plantation, bank and transport (largely MISC) sectors.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, given <strong>the</strong> weaker GDP growth outlook for 1Q09<br />

and 2009, we believe <strong>the</strong>re could still be downside risk to our<br />

earnings.<br />

Downside to earnings from banks. Despite <strong>the</strong> constant<br />

downgrades last year, we believe <strong>the</strong>re could still be<br />

downside to earnings. Banks, accounting for 29% of our<br />

universe earnings, could see higher provision charge-off rates<br />

as NPLs increase with <strong>the</strong> weaker economic outlook.<br />

For every 10 bps increase in provision charge-off rates (current<br />

average at 77 bps), our bank sector earnings will fall by 5%.<br />

This is equivalent to a 10 bps increase in net NPLs to 2.4%<br />

from 2.3% (based on our universe). The higher charge-off<br />

rates will reduce our universe earnings by 1ppt.<br />

Page 86


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Malaysia Universe: Earnings Growth by Sector<br />

Net profit ex EI Earnings Growth %) PE (x)<br />

2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010<br />

Financial 10,348.8 9,578.4 10,112.5 5.0 (7.4) 5.6 9.3 10.1 9.6<br />

Consumer 1,098.8 1,192.1 1,300.8 10.6 8.5 9.1 15.5 14.3 13.1<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial 910.3 481.4 545.5 45.9 (47.1) 13.3 3.1 5.9 5.2<br />

Motor 652.3 249.7 494.6 367.8 (61.7) 98.1 11.4 29.8 15.0<br />

Oil & Gas 620.5 766.5 831.3 41.9 23.5 8.4 4.9 4.0 3.7<br />

Conglomerate 4,531.3 3,023.0 2,934.9 55.4 (33.3) (2.9) 9.7 14.6 15.0<br />

Construction 1,177.9 1,192.4 1,383.0 20.6 1.2 16.0 10.8 10.7 9.2<br />

Concessionaires 1,169.6 1,225.8 1,286.1 (8.8) 4.8 4.9 13.1 12.5 11.9<br />

Gaming 2,912.0 3,078.4 3,157.8 (12.4) 5.7 2.6 10.5 9.9 9.7<br />

Plantation 4,022.3 2,520.5 2,820.5 40.4 (37.3) 11.9 9.9 15.9 14.2<br />

Power 3,598.4 3,190.4 3,443.6 (25.7) (11.3) 7.9 10.6 11.9 11.0<br />

Property 723.8 824.5 865.2 (0.5) 13.9 4.9 10.5 9.2 8.8<br />

Telecommunication 2,488.3 2,509.1 2,619.1 (35.5) 0.8 4.4 15.2 15.0 14.4<br />

Transportation/Logistic 1,450.3 2,892.9 3,032.0 (42.9) 99.5 4.8 28.0 14.0 13.4<br />

H<strong>DBS</strong>VR’s universe 35,862.6 32,892.3 35,025.6 0.5 (8.3) 6.5 11.1 12.1 11.3<br />

Notes: (1) Companies with financial year ending Jan – Mar have been classified as preceding year’s results.<br />

(2) Earnings exclude exceptional items.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Net Profit Change by Sector<br />

RMm 2009 2010<br />

1,000<br />

586<br />

725<br />

500<br />

-<br />

(500)<br />

93<br />

95146<br />

199<br />

109 69<br />

80<br />

41<br />

(16)<br />

(398)<br />

(188)<br />

192 166<br />

14 4877 79<br />

253<br />

253<br />

10649 110 139<br />

21<br />

(408)<br />

(1,000)<br />

(772)<br />

(1,500)<br />

(2,000)<br />

(1656)<br />

(2056)<br />

(2,500)<br />

Financial<br />

Consumer<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial<br />

Media<br />

Motor<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Conglomerate<br />

Construction<br />

Concessionaires<br />

Gaming<br />

Plantation<br />

Power<br />

Property<br />

Telecommunication<br />

Transportation/Logistic<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 87


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Remaking <strong>the</strong> KLCI<br />

Effective 6 July 2009, Bursa Malaysia will restructure its primary<br />

benchmark index by swapping <strong>the</strong> prevailing Kuala Lumpur<br />

Composite Index (KLCI) with <strong>the</strong> FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBM<br />

KLCI). The 30-member FBM KLCI will capture <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

companies by market capitalization listed on <strong>the</strong> Main Board<br />

that will be free-float adjusted.<br />

The changeover is expected to prompt investors – especially<br />

index-tracking funds – to realign <strong>the</strong>ir portfolios. Probable<br />

winners are: (i) stocks presently in <strong>the</strong> FBM30 but not in <strong>the</strong><br />

KLCI, namely Resorts, YTL Power and Parkson; and (ii) stocks<br />

whose relative weightings are higher in <strong>the</strong> FBM30 than in <strong>the</strong><br />

KLCI, such as Public Bank, Bumiputra-Commerce and Sime<br />

Darby. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Petronas Gas, MISC and RHB Capital<br />

should see lower relative weightings. With <strong>the</strong> change, we<br />

should see a more sensitive benchmark index. Banks should see<br />

a similar weighting (23%) while plantations (19% from 16%)<br />

and power (16% from 13%) should have higher weightings.<br />

week of March. In addition, <strong>the</strong> media reported in March that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ministry of Finance approached <strong>the</strong> consortium led by<br />

Shimizu Corp (which put in a bid of RM1.3bn) for <strong>the</strong> tunnelling<br />

portion of <strong>the</strong> Pahang-Selangor Interstate Water transfer project<br />

after scrutinising bids. O<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong> consortium include<br />

IJM Corp, UEM Group and Nishimatsu Construction Co. We<br />

expect <strong>the</strong> acceleration of government awards to benefit <strong>the</strong><br />

construction industry.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> beginning of 2008, construction sector share prices<br />

experienced one of <strong>the</strong> sharpest drops (-63%). In February<br />

2008, Gamuda MD Dato’ Lin sold 70m shares (3.5%) in<br />

Gamuda. Since <strong>the</strong>n, Gamuda has lost 58% in share value.<br />

The shocking results of <strong>the</strong> 12th General Election in March<br />

2008 resulted in <strong>the</strong> postponement of several mega projects,<br />

including <strong>the</strong> Penang Monorail and <strong>the</strong> Penang Outer Ring<br />

Road. Construction margins collapsed with record high steel<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r material prices. Property sales slowed with waning<br />

consumer confidence.<br />

FBM’s market capitalization by sector<br />

Sharp drop in steel prices<br />

Consumer<br />

3%<br />

Gaming<br />

8%<br />

Infra<br />

3%<br />

Shipping<br />

5%<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

3%<br />

Telco<br />

9%<br />

Power<br />

16%<br />

Property<br />

0%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

3%<br />

Banking/<br />

Finance<br />

23%<br />

Plantation<br />

19%<br />

US$/MT<br />

1,300<br />

1,200<br />

1,100<br />

1,000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

-<br />

Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Jan-08 Mar-08 May-08 Jul-08 Sep-08 Nov-08 Jan-09 Mar-09<br />

Heavy Melting Scrap Average bar prices Average rod prices<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Expect pump-priming to accelerate<br />

Going forward, we expect government pump-priming to<br />

accelerate. On top of a record RM53.7bn development<br />

expenditure (+16% from RM46.3bn) announced in Budget<br />

2009, <strong>the</strong> government has announced two stimulus packages –<br />

RM7bn in November 2008 and RM60bn over two years in<br />

March 2009. The second stimulus package reiterates <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s commitment towards pump-priming to stimulate<br />

domestic demand with <strong>the</strong> planned acceleration of RM8.4bn<br />

worth of Ninth Malaysia Plan (9MP) projects.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

The investment case for <strong>the</strong> sector has since improved. Steel<br />

prices fell almost as fast as it increased. The record high<br />

development expenditure (with lower cost) and two stimulus<br />

packages point to more and greater acceleration of<br />

government project awards. Valuations are below or close to<br />

average 1998 levels. There could still be some near-term<br />

earnings weakness ahead. However, with valuations at 0.7x<br />

bk value for IJM Corp, our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector, we believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> weakness has been priced in.<br />

Newsflow on <strong>the</strong> sector is gaining momentum. Deputy Prime<br />

Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak announced that <strong>the</strong><br />

government will award RM3.2bn worth of projects in <strong>the</strong> last<br />

Page 88


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r OPR cuts<br />

KLCI forward PE<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first quarter of this year, <strong>the</strong> central bank has already cut<br />

<strong>the</strong> overnight policy rate (OPR) twice, by 125 bps to 2% (January<br />

75 bps; February 50 bps). BLR has fallen by c. 95 bps while fixed<br />

deposit rates lower by c.100 bps. SRR has also been reduced to<br />

1%.<br />

We expect a fur<strong>the</strong>r 50 bps cut in OPR to 1.5% by end 2Q09.<br />

Exact impact to bank earnings depends on <strong>the</strong> resulting moves<br />

in <strong>the</strong> BLR and FD rates. We estimate that every 10bps drop in<br />

lending yields would lower NIM by 11bps on average, and<br />

earnings by 7.7%. Meanwhile, every 10bps drop in cost of funds<br />

would raise NIM by 9bps and earnings by 7.4%. Hence, if BLR<br />

and FD rates dropped by <strong>the</strong> same quantum, NIM would fall<br />

2bps and earnings by a marginal 0.3%.<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

-<br />

Dec-97<br />

Nov-98<br />

Sep-99<br />

Jul-00<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Jun-01<br />

Apr-02<br />

Feb-03<br />

Jan-04<br />

Forward PE (LHS)<br />

Nov-04<br />

Sep-05<br />

Aug-06<br />

KLCI Index (RHS)<br />

Jun-07<br />

May-08<br />

M ar-09<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

-<br />

Sensitivity analysis: For every 10bps decline in lending yields:<br />

AMMB BCHB EON Cap HLBank Maybank Public RHB Cap<br />

Average lending yield 4.91% 5.39% 4.83% 4.11% 4.73% 4.38% 4.61%<br />

NIM 2.39% 2.54% 2.30% 1.77% 2.09% 1.86% 2.26%<br />

Net profit 920.0 1,675.4 332.0 692.4 2,232.8 2,434.0 859.3<br />

% change<br />

NIM -0.10% -0.11% -0.10% -0.09% -0.16% -0.10% -0.10%<br />

Net profit -6.3% -7.9% -8.9% -7.7% -8.6% -5.8% -8.6%<br />

Sensitivity analysis: For every 10bps decline in cost of funds:<br />

AMMB BCHB EON Cap HLBank Maybank Public RHB Cap<br />

Average cost of funds 2.48% 2.74% 2.59% 2.39% 2.33% 2.57% 2.45%<br />

NIM 2.59% 2.74% 2.49% 1.95% 2.29% 2.06% 2.45%<br />

Net profit 1,042.1 1,954.4 394.4 809.9 2,653.0 2,726.0 1,014.1<br />

% change<br />

NIM 0.10% 0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.04% 0.10% 0.09%<br />

Net profit 6.1% 7.5% 8.2% 7.9% 8.7% 5.5% 7.9%<br />

Source: Company data; <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

The rate cuts are positive for <strong>the</strong> property sector. We estimate<br />

this would boost affordability by 5.8% and reduce risk of nonperforming<br />

loans/ fire-sales which could depress selling prices.<br />

However, we do not expect it to reverse <strong>the</strong> weak demand in<br />

<strong>the</strong> near-term, given economic uncertainties and dampened<br />

sentiments.<br />

Strategy<br />

The benchmark KLCI remains one of <strong>the</strong> better performers in <strong>the</strong><br />

region YTD. However, its valuations are also among <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

at 12x 2009 earnings (11x 2010). Against its historical range,<br />

valuations are attractive, trading at close to trough PE levels. In<br />

terms of P/Bk, since 1997, only 1997-98 levels were lower. Our<br />

12-month KLCI target stands at 900, based on 12x 2010. This is<br />

close to post-crisis trough levels.<br />

In terms of sectors, apart from construction, we like<br />

concessionaires and power. Toll roads saw share prices drop in<br />

August 2008 on talks that <strong>the</strong> government plans to<br />

renegotiate toll agreements while IPPs fell in June 2008 when<br />

<strong>the</strong> windfall tax was first announced. Although toll<br />

renegotiations did not materialize and <strong>the</strong> IPP windfall tax is<br />

now only imposed for a year, share prices did not recover.<br />

Their earnings stand out as being relatively more resilient<br />

compared to many o<strong>the</strong>r sectors. Cashflows are strong,<br />

leading to sustainable dividends that are above market. PLUS,<br />

Litrak, YTLP and Tanjong have yields above 4.9%.<br />

On a stock-specific basis, we advocate:- (i) stocks with resilient<br />

earnings that provide sustainable yields; and (ii) bombedout/value<br />

stocks. Although <strong>the</strong>re may still be downside to<br />

earnings, we believe <strong>the</strong> bad news for <strong>the</strong>se stocks are in <strong>the</strong><br />

price. For example, potential drop in passenger traffic for<br />

MAHB and higher provisions for EON Capital. However, we<br />

believe this has already been more than priced in with <strong>the</strong><br />

respective stock’s low valuations.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, we see fur<strong>the</strong>r downside for Sime Darby,<br />

being <strong>the</strong> most expensive in <strong>the</strong> sector at 15.8x FY10F EPS<br />

and projected earnings and dividends contracting for <strong>the</strong> next<br />

two years. BCHB remains Fully Valued on continued weak<br />

capital market activities. There could be fur<strong>the</strong>r increases in<br />

operating expenses resulting from <strong>the</strong> consolidation of its<br />

acquisitions (i.e. Lippo-Niaga merger). We foresee weak near<br />

term earnings outlook for Bursa Malaysia, which continues to<br />

trade above regional peers.<br />

Page 89


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

FY09F Regional PE<br />

YTD change for regional bourses<br />

16.0<br />

10.0<br />

YTD % chg<br />

52-wk % chg<br />

14.0<br />

5.0<br />

12.0<br />

-<br />

09F PE (x)<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

(5.0)<br />

(10.0)<br />

(15.0)<br />

(20.0)<br />

(25.0)<br />

Singapore<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Philippines<br />

Thailand<br />

Malaysia<br />

China<br />

Indonesia<br />

Korea<br />

2.0<br />

(30.0)<br />

0.0<br />

Korea<br />

Malaysia<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Philippines<br />

Singapore<br />

China<br />

Indonesia<br />

(35.0)<br />

(40.0)<br />

(45.0)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg, Datastream<br />

Defensive and yielding picks<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP Rec PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

Public Bank - Foreign 26,489 7.50 11.90 B 8.6 7.9 2.3 2.1 9.3 10.1<br />

PLUS 14,400 2.88 3.30 B 12.6 12.0 2.4 2.2 5.5 5.5<br />

BAT 12,635 44.25 45.70 B 15.7 15.3 25.4 21.4 5.8 5.9<br />

YTL Power 11,107 1.89 2.05 B 13.4 12.5 1.9 1.8 5.3 5.3<br />

Tanjong 5,767 14.30 19.25 B 10.2 9.0 1.6 1.5 5.0 5.3<br />

KLCC Prop 2,784 2.98 3.40 B 12.4 11.6 0.8 0.7 3.8 4.0<br />

MAHB 2,739 2.49 3.20 B 8.4 8.0 0.8 0.8 5.9 6.3<br />

Litrak 943 1.90 2.40 B 10.5 11.9 2.4 2.5 13.2 10.5<br />

Axis REIT 328 1.28 1.80 B 8.3 8.4 0.7 0.7 11.4 11.3<br />

Prices as at 19 Mar. Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 90


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Top Sells/FV<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP Rec PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

Sime Darby 32,752 5.45 4.00 S 15.4 15.8 1.5 1.4 3.3 3.2<br />

BCHB 22,542 6.30 5.50 FV 12.5 11.5 1.3 1.3 2.9 2.9<br />

Bursa Malaysia 2,556 4.86 4.00 FV 24.0 22.1 3.5 3.4 3.8 4.1<br />

Prices as at 19 Mar. Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Bombed-out/value stock picks<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP Rec PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

Genting 12,519 3.38 4.20 B 9.1 8.3 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.4<br />

Resorts 11,391 1.93 2.60 B 9.2 10.4 1.4 1.2 3.3 2.9<br />

AMMB 6,671 2.45 2.90 B 7.9 7.9 0.9 0.8 3.2 3.2<br />

IJM Corp 3,579 3.80 4.60 B 13.2 11.6 0.7 0.7 2.4 2.4<br />

MAHB 2,739 2.49 3.20 B 8.4 8.0 0.8 0.8 5.9 6.3<br />

EON Capital 1,892 2.73 3.00 B 8.9 7.9 0.6 0.5 2.2 2.2<br />

Prices as at 19 Mar. Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 91


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Aviation & related<br />

Underweight<br />

Banks<br />

Neutral<br />

Construction<br />

Overweight<br />

Concessionaires<br />

Overweight<br />

Outlook for <strong>the</strong> sector remains bleak. While <strong>the</strong> sharp drop in crude oil prices could<br />

provide some relief, we expect weaker air travel demand given <strong>the</strong> global economic<br />

slowdown. Additional capacity coming from AirAsia and more route liberalizations<br />

may also intensify competition between <strong>the</strong> airlines in <strong>the</strong> domestic and regional<br />

markets. Our top pick is Malaysia Airports (Buy; PT RM3.20) for its increasing nonaeronautical<br />

business contribution (mainly rental) which could cushion earnings (hit<br />

by weak passenger traffic growth). Additionally, we expect MAHB to benefit from<br />

<strong>the</strong> financial restructuring, with FY09F-10F earnings likely to be lifted by 1-3% due<br />

to net increase in government compensation. MAHB also offers sustainable net<br />

dividend yield of 6%.<br />

Earnings outlook is on a downward bias with uncertainties lingering in asset quality<br />

indicators. We believe that banks are unlikely to experience credit costs and NPL<br />

ratios experienced during <strong>the</strong> Asian financial crisis but would never<strong>the</strong>less see inch<br />

ups after several good years of recoveries. On a stress test, we believe industry net<br />

NPL ratio could see a high of 3.8% from 2.2% in 2008. We expect operating<br />

income to remain relatively healthy although some banks may suffer from net<br />

interest margin compression as <strong>the</strong> impact from <strong>the</strong> recent OPR cuts sink in. Key<br />

beneficiary to <strong>the</strong> OPR cut is AMMB while <strong>the</strong> bank expected to be hit <strong>the</strong> most<br />

would be Hong Leong Bank. We project loan growth of 4% for 2009.<br />

We remain Neutral on <strong>the</strong> banking sector despite uncertain <strong>the</strong> international<br />

financial environment. Key risks to our calls would be higher than expected NPLs<br />

and credit cost charges should <strong>the</strong> economy take a longer time to recover. Our top<br />

pick remains Public Bank (Buy, TP RM11.90), while BCHB has <strong>the</strong> most downside to<br />

our price target (Fully Valued; TP RM5.50). We upgraded Maybank to Buy with<br />

price target of RM4.60 after a significant oversold position.<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> acceleration of contract flows and more conducive cost environment<br />

to be earnings kickers for <strong>the</strong> sector in 2009. Construction related works from <strong>the</strong><br />

second stimulus package amounted to RM15bn vs <strong>the</strong> first stimulus package of<br />

RM4bn. Still, even when combined this is just 36% of 2009’s committed<br />

development expenditure. While 3Q08 was <strong>the</strong> trough for construction margins,<br />

meaningful recovery will likely only occur in 2H09 and underpin future profitability<br />

of contractors.<br />

We expect newsflow on award of contracts to pick up momentum post transition<br />

of power end March 2009. Key risks for <strong>the</strong> sector are execution and delay in<br />

contract awards, <strong>the</strong> ability to raise financing and <strong>the</strong> lack of transparency in<br />

awarding contracts. But we do expect a flight to quality contractors as <strong>the</strong> smaller<br />

and less efficient players get weeded out. A case in point is <strong>the</strong> cancellation of<br />

PECD Construction Sdn Bhd’s RM528m KL Flood Mitigation project which has to be<br />

reawarded. Our picks are IJM (Buy, PT RM4.60) as a strong recovery story and<br />

MRCB (Buy, PT RM1.10) as GLC proxy construction stock. Gamuda and WCT<br />

remain as Fully Valued.<br />

Our positive view on <strong>the</strong> toll concessions is premised upon its strong free cash flows<br />

and resilient dividends. We think in an environment of falling interest rates and<br />

earnings volatility, <strong>the</strong>se attributes stand out. We think key issues for <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> 2009 scheduled toll rate increases and nationalisation are non events.<br />

For PLUS scheduled 2009 toll rate increase, we understand compensation will be<br />

via cash. Hence, <strong>the</strong>re will be no disruption to its FCF generating ability.<br />

Nationalisation of PLUS and Litrak are remote, in our view. We estimate <strong>the</strong><br />

government will have to fork out RM28bn to nationalise PLUS while it is also highly<br />

unlikely that <strong>the</strong> ruling government will yield to <strong>the</strong> fancies of <strong>the</strong> opposition<br />

government. Our large cap liquid pick is PLUS which will yield 5.5% for 2009 based<br />

on its 16 sen KPI. Litrak’s 20 sen final dividend recently went ex. We do not expect<br />

<strong>the</strong> stock to generate a lot of interest until it draws closer its next dividend date.<br />

Malaysia Airports<br />

Public Bank, AMMB,<br />

Maybank<br />

IJM, MRCB<br />

Litrak, PLUS<br />

Page 92


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Gaming<br />

Overweight<br />

Logistics<br />

Underweight<br />

Motor<br />

Underweight<br />

Oil & gas<br />

Neutral<br />

We upgrade Genting (TP: RM4.20, based on SOP) and Resorts (TP: RM2.60, based<br />

on 14.2x forward PE) to Buy from Hold, as we see limited downside with valuations<br />

hitting 911/SARS trough (10x 2010 PE). If we exclude Resorts’ RM4.8b cashpile<br />

(0.76sen/share), market is valuing its gaming business at only 6.5x 2010 PE.<br />

Similarly, investors would be getting <strong>the</strong> rest of Genting’s non-listed business<br />

(power, oil & gas, property) for free. We advocate investors to switch out from BST<br />

(Fully Valued) as it is priced to perfection, with high hopes of a 75% dividend<br />

payout and special dividend, which would unlikely materialize. There is also limited<br />

upside as BST's share price would likely be kept below RM5.16 in order not to<br />

trigger Berjaya Land's exchangeable bondholders to convert into BST shares.<br />

We are positive on <strong>the</strong> sector given resilient visitor arrivals and NFO spending. Risks:<br />

high foreign shareholding, corporate governance and potential cash call by Star<br />

Cruises, which we believe have been priced-in, given <strong>the</strong> massive 75% discount<br />

implied on Resorts’ net cash.<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> correction in petroleum tanker rates to persist as <strong>the</strong> supply of new<br />

vessels should continue to pressure rates until 2010 when <strong>the</strong> mandatory scrapping<br />

of single hull vessels deadline approaches as well as softer oil demand. Meanwhile,<br />

<strong>the</strong> outlook for container shipping remains challenging as <strong>the</strong> supply demand gap<br />

is projected to widen fur<strong>the</strong>r in 2009F-10F on 12% jump in new capacity p.a.<br />

Container trade volume growth is predicted to slow down to 3% y-o-y (from<br />

historical average of 11% p.a) this year on expectation that global economy would<br />

continue to weaken. We expect MISC’s (Fully Valued; PT RM7.15), earnings to<br />

continue to be dragged down by <strong>the</strong> weakness in petroleum tanker and container<br />

shipping rates.<br />

We recently downgraded our forecast 2009 total industry volume (TIV) to 408k<br />

units vs. 450k previously, following a downgrade in Malaysia’s GDP. We remain<br />

CAUTIOUS on <strong>the</strong> sector given a weak consumption outlook. Also, <strong>the</strong> weak MYR<br />

vs. <strong>the</strong> USD and <strong>the</strong> Yen continues to pressure margins of auto companies.<br />

UMW is our top FULLY VALUED stock given its large downside potential of 30% vs.<br />

only 4% net yield. It risks shifting into a net debt position (from net cash currently)<br />

considering its active investments into <strong>the</strong> oil & gas industry. Proton remains our<br />

sole BUY call in <strong>the</strong> auto sector, for its battered down valuations, with a revised<br />

price target of RM2.60.<br />

There is a lack of near term catalyst for <strong>the</strong> oil and gas sector as we expect oil price<br />

to rebound only towards 4Q09. Never<strong>the</strong>less, we see this as a short term blip and<br />

longer term fundamentals of <strong>the</strong> sector are intact, supported by resilient Petronas’<br />

capex and continuous project flow after <strong>the</strong> cost review and retendering process.<br />

Malaysia’s oil and gas players are also less vulnerable to <strong>the</strong> crude oil price as <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are mainly services and equipment providers and vessel owners and operators that<br />

benefit from increased production activities. Our pick is Alam for its attractive<br />

margins, undemanding valuations and good earnings visibility. We maintain Hold<br />

calls for o<strong>the</strong>r stocks such as KNM, WSC, Petra and Toff given <strong>the</strong>ir attractive<br />

valuations that have priced in <strong>the</strong> risk from <strong>the</strong> plunge in crude oil price. Key risks<br />

for <strong>the</strong> sector are: -1) prolonged decline in crude oil price, and 2) delay in contract<br />

due to volatile commodity prices.<br />

Genting<br />

Resorts World<br />

MISC<br />

Proton<br />

Alam Maritim<br />

Page 93


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Plantations<br />

Underweight<br />

Property<br />

Underweight<br />

We raised our 09F, 10F, and 11F CPO prices by 25%, 17% and 12% to RM1,900,<br />

RM2,000 and RM2,200, respectively due to <strong>the</strong> effects of drought in South<br />

America. However, most plantation stocks have more than priced this in and we<br />

see downside potential in <strong>the</strong> near term, as CPO production volume rebounds and<br />

exports slow down. Our top Sell/Fully Valued call is Sime Darby (for lofty multiples<br />

and earnings deterioration) and IOI Corporation (on expectations of more FX losses,<br />

potential fur<strong>the</strong>r write-downs on its Singapore property projects and slow recovery<br />

in resource-based manufacturing).<br />

We expect 2009 property sales to fall by 25% back to 2005-06’s more sustainable<br />

levels of ~RM60b, with rising concerns over job/ income security, selective lending<br />

by banks and weak sentiments. Developers’ margins are also expected to decline<br />

with higher contribution from more affordable products and increased marketing/<br />

financing expenses.<br />

Although sector valuation is depressed, it may stay cheap for a while given no<br />

significant near-term catalyst in sight. We prefer asset owners over developers<br />

given <strong>the</strong>ir more defensive earnings. Pockets of opportunities may emerge in <strong>the</strong><br />

form of M&As, privatisation and land deals.<br />

KLCC Property<br />

Steel<br />

Neutral<br />

Telco<br />

Underweight<br />

The local steel producers posted losses for 4Q08 mainly on inventory writedowns<br />

and forex loss. We do not anticipate fur<strong>the</strong>r writedowns in <strong>the</strong> coming quarters as<br />

we believe <strong>the</strong> companies have completed <strong>the</strong>ir de-stocking activities. Outlook for<br />

<strong>the</strong> local steel industry seems promising supported by <strong>the</strong> second stimulus package<br />

where we expect steel demand to be revived when construction projects resume.<br />

However, we are concerned with two issues that may hamper progress: (i) timing –<br />

project delays, and (ii) pricing – steel prices are not likely to return to previous<br />

highs. We remain Neutral on <strong>the</strong> sector and recommend a Hold on Kinsteel (TP<br />

RM0.45). Current valuations are undemanding at 0.3x FY10F NTA or 2.6x FY10F<br />

EPS.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> market would be excited about Maxis launching <strong>the</strong> first official iPhone<br />

plan in Malaysia on <strong>the</strong> 20 th March, we think it would not have a lasting effect since<br />

<strong>the</strong> iPhone is already losing its novelty. Never<strong>the</strong>less, we expect competition to<br />

remain keen in Malaysia with <strong>the</strong> possibility of high prepaid tariff (relative to<br />

postpaid rates) to fall. Competition in <strong>the</strong> mobile data segment is also expected to<br />

intensify with Digi launching its 3G services by end-Mar09 and WiMAX operator,<br />

Green Packet, having just awarded its Phase II rollout to ZTE. Fixed line operator,<br />

TM, would be <strong>the</strong> prime victim as we expect wireless operators to target <strong>the</strong>ir data<br />

services at TM’s customers.<br />

Kinsteel<br />

Power<br />

Overweight<br />

We prefer IPPs over TNB for <strong>the</strong>ir defensive earnings base and attractive dividend<br />

yield supported by strong cashflow. YTLP is poised for fur<strong>the</strong>r acquisition growth<br />

given <strong>the</strong> still high gross cash of RM7b after Power Seraya acquisition. We expect<br />

potential lower returns from Wessex after tariff adjustment in 2010 to be<br />

compensated by maiden contribution from Power Seraya from 4Q09 onwards. We<br />

also see low risk in Tanjong’s power investments in Egypt, Bangladesh, Pakistan<br />

and Sri Lanka as <strong>the</strong> capacity payments are guaranteed by <strong>the</strong> respective<br />

governments, and electricity generation remains <strong>the</strong> key infrastructure need in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se countries given <strong>the</strong> low reserve margins. Tanjong is also on track for net<br />

dividend of 5% supported mainly by <strong>the</strong> NFO operation. Key risks include:- 1) forex<br />

changes due to high proportion of overseas earnings for YTLP and Tanjong, and 2)<br />

Overhang concerns on Malaysia PPA negotiation.<br />

YTL Power, Tanjong PLC<br />

Page 94


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

REITs<br />

Neutral<br />

M-REIT will focus on organic growth given <strong>the</strong> weak equity market and low<br />

appetite for new equity raising exercises. New acquisition is unlikely to be yield<br />

accretive as a result of <strong>the</strong> high average gross yield of 11%. Financing concern is<br />

manageable as Malaysian banks are still keen to restructure short term loans to a<br />

longer tenure, and interest rate differential is small at between 0.5-1.0% ppt.<br />

Malaysian banks are also unlikely to pull back credit lines from loans with stable<br />

rental income, strong sponsors and high collateral values, given <strong>the</strong> ample liquidity<br />

in <strong>the</strong> banking system. O<strong>the</strong>r key risks include:- 1) Potential asset devaluation that<br />

may stretch REITs’ gearing ratio closer to <strong>the</strong> 50% limit, and 2) potential increase<br />

in loan spread from banks due to higher risk aversion towards property related<br />

companies. Our pick is Axis Risk for its attractive yield, attractive asset valuation<br />

and low refinancing risk.<br />

Axis REIT<br />

Page 95


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

IJM Corp<br />

Bloomberg: IJM MK | Reuters: IJMS.KL<br />

BUY RM3.80 KLCI : 852.18<br />

Price Target : 12-Month RM 4.60<br />

Potential Catalyst: Improving margins and new contract wins<br />

Analyst<br />

Chong Tjen-San, CFA +603 2711 2295<br />

tjensan@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Price Relative<br />

RM<br />

10.20<br />

9.20<br />

8.20<br />

7.20<br />

6.20<br />

5.20<br />

4.20<br />

3.20<br />

2.20<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

IJM Corp (LHS) Relative KLCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Mar (RM m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 4,637 4,231 3,852 4,141<br />

EBITDA 851 860 816 905<br />

Pre-tax Profit (145) 558 485 588<br />

Net Profit (420) 309 308 371<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 294 271 308 371<br />

EPS (sen) (48.9) 32.8 32.7 39.4<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (sen) 34.3 28.8 32.7 39.4<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 1 (16) 14 20<br />

Diluted EPS (sen) (48.7) 32.1 32.0 38.5<br />

Net DPS (sen) 0.0 9.3 9.3 9.3<br />

BV Per Share (sen) 538.6 511.6 535.3 565.7<br />

PE (X) nm 11.6 11.6 9.6<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 11.1 13.2 11.6 9.6<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) nm 8.1 8.2 7.2<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 7.9 8.6 9.0 8.0<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 0.0 2.4 2.4 2.4<br />

P/Book Value (X) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4<br />

ROAE (%) (11.6) 6.5 6.3 7.2<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (sen): 36.0 36.0 38.7<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Construction & Materials<br />

Principal Business: Construction, property development, plantations<br />

207<br />

187<br />

167<br />

147<br />

127<br />

107<br />

87<br />

67<br />

47<br />

Contract visibility improving<br />

IJM remains our top pick as a strong recovery play to <strong>the</strong><br />

construction sector. We think visibility of new contract wins<br />

remain bright with a potential of up to RM5.8bn worth of<br />

new jobs after clinching RM1.2bn for <strong>the</strong> first 3-months of<br />

2009. Reiterate BUY with TP of RM4.60, based on 12x<br />

CY10 EPS.<br />

Brighter prospects for new contract wins. In our view,<br />

IJM is a prime beneficiary from <strong>the</strong> acceleration of<br />

government awards. Besides <strong>the</strong> RM2.3bn worth of new<br />

jobs which we understand IJM is vying for, we think it has a<br />

fair chance of clinching up to RM3.5bn worth of o<strong>the</strong>r new<br />

jobs (RM2bn LCCT, RM1.3bn Intermark redevelopment and<br />

RM250m Penang airport). This is after bagging some<br />

RM1.2bn in new jobs for 1QCY09. Also, <strong>the</strong> recent 40%<br />

take up for IJM Land’s Summer Place in Penang should<br />

instil confidence that its maiden launch of ‘Light<br />

development’ in Jelutong in June should do well.<br />

Rerating catalysts. We think catalysts for a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

rerating will be progressive improvement in construction<br />

margins from 2QFY09’s trough of 0.9% and acceleration<br />

of new contract wins from <strong>the</strong> 9MP. 4QFY09 margins<br />

should continue to show fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement from<br />

3QFY09’s 1.3%. Also, our FY10 orderbook replenishment<br />

assumption of RM1bn (excluding RM649m Besraya)<br />

appears conservative vis a vis <strong>the</strong> potential pipeline of<br />

RM5.8bn.<br />

Still below 1998 levels. In spite of IJM outperforming <strong>the</strong><br />

KLCI YTD, valuations remain at a bargain, trading at 11.7x<br />

FY10 and 0.7x NTA, below 1998 average levels of 13.6x<br />

and 0.8x NTA. Our FY10 EPS is 10% below consensus.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 942<br />

Mkt. Cap (RMm/US$m) 3,579 / 980<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

EPF (%) 21.9<br />

Zelan (%) 9.6<br />

Free Float (%) 78.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 1,603<br />

Page 96<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: LM / sa: MT


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

IJM Corp<br />

Income Statement (RM m) Balance Sheet (RM m)<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 4,637 4,231 3,852 4,141 Net Fixed Assets 1,180 1,261 1,244 1,228<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (3,653) (3,431) (3,107) (3,295) Invts in Associates & JVs 1,059 1,078 1,097 1,118<br />

Gross Profit 984 801 745 846 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 3,880 3,969 4,057 4,146<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (275) (91) (77) (88) Cash & ST Invts 735 652 885 1,181<br />

Operating Profit 709 710 668 758 Inventory 342 513 564 620<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 2,179 3,268 3,595 3,954<br />

Associates & JV Inc 18 19 19 20 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 1,774 1,774 1,774 1,774<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (157) (209) (202) (191) Total Assets 11,148 12,515 13,216 14,022<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (715) 38 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit (145) 558 485 588 ST Debt 847 847 847 847<br />

Tax (155) (127) (121) (147) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 1,851 2,760 3,032 3,332<br />

Minority Interest (120) (121) (56) (70) LT Debt 2,383 2,533 2,683 2,833<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 503 503 503 503<br />

Net Profit (420) 309 308 371 Shareholder’s Equity 4,628 4,815 5,038 5,324<br />

Net Profit before Except. 294 271 308 371 Minority Interests 936 1,057 1,113 1,183<br />

EBITDA 851 860 816 905 Total Cap. & Liab. 11,148 12,515 13,216 14,022<br />

Sales Gth (%) 100.6 (8.7) (9.0) 7.5 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 2,443 2,795 2,901 3,017<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 93.0 1.1 (5.1) 10.9 Net Cash/(Debt) (2,495) (2,728) (2,645) (2,498)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 93.9 0.1 (5.9) 13.5<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (316.4) (173.5) (0.3) 20.3<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) N/A 22.8 25.0 25.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RM m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit (145) 520 485 588 Gross Margins (%) 21.2 18.9 19.3 20.4<br />

Dep. & Amort. 142 150 148 147 Opg Profit Margin (%) 15.3 16.8 17.3 18.3<br />

Tax Paid (155) (127) (121) (147) Net Profit Margin (%) (9.1) 7.3 8.0 9.0<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (18) (19) (19) (20) ROAE (%) (11.6) 6.5 6.3 7.2<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 50 (352) (106) (116) ROA (%) (4.9) 2.6 2.4 2.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 435 209 202 191 ROCE (%) 10.2 5.8 5.0 5.4<br />

Net Operating CF 307 380 589 642 Div Payout Ratio (%) N/A 28.2 28.2 23.5<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (499) (320) (220) (220) Net Interest Cover (x) 4.5 3.4 3.3 4.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (43) 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 223 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 155.0 234.9 325.2 332.7<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 12 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 158.8 252.6 353.0 365.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 129 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 29.9 47.5 66.4 68.7<br />

Net Investing CF (179) (320) (220) (220) Current Ratio (x) 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.8<br />

Div Paid (56) (85) (85) (85) Quick Ratio (x) 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 160 (59) (52) (41) Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4<br />

Capital Issues 77 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 15.5 9.5 6.2 6.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 105 0 0 0 Z-Score (X) 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3<br />

Net Financing CF 286 (143) (137) (126) N. Cash/(Debt)PS (sen) (290.3) (289.8) (281.1) (265.5)<br />

Net Cashflow 415 (83) 233 297 Opg CFPS (sen) 30.0 77.8 73.8 80.6<br />

Free CFPS (sen) (22.4) 6.4 39.3 44.9<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (RM m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown<br />

FY Mar 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 3Q2009 FY Mar 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,313 1,221 1,158 1,044 Revenues (RM m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (1,011) (964) (924) (817) Construction 2,152 1,591 1,465 1,515<br />

Gross Profit 302 258 234 227 Property 928 882 749 862<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (32) (58) (27) (50) Manufacturing & quarry 811 967 1,016 1,067<br />

Operating Profit 270 200 207 177 Plantation 478 511 327 388<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>rs 267 281 295 310<br />

Associates & JV Inc 5 10 5 (1) Total 4,637 4,231 3,852 4,141<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (45) (43) (44) (50) PBT excl Except. (RM m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Construction 166 47 93 128<br />

Pre-tax Profit 229 166 169 125 Property 107 106 120 138<br />

Tax (10) (37) (48) (38) Manufacturing & quarry 97 159 165 174<br />

Minority Interest (38) (38) (33) (29) Plantation 191 173 71 108<br />

Net Profit 181 91 88 58 O<strong>the</strong>rs 9 35 36 39<br />

Net profit bef Except. 181 91 88 58 Total 570 520 485 588<br />

PBT excl Except. Margins (%)<br />

Construction 18.4 2.2 5.8 8.8<br />

Sales Gth (%) 19.0 (7.0) (5.2) (9.8) Property 11.5 12.0 16.0 16.0<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 0.4 (26.0) 4.0 (14.7) Plantation 40.0 33.9 21.7 27.8<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 35.7 (49.6) (3.7) (34.5) O<strong>the</strong>rs 3.5 12.5 12.3 12.6<br />

Gross Margins (%) 23.0 21.1 20.2 21.8 Total 12.3 12.3 12.6 14.2<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 20.6 16.3 17.9 16.9<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 13.8 7.5 7.6 5.5<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 97


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

PLUS Expressway<br />

Bloomberg: PLUS MK | Reuters: PLUE.KL<br />

BUY RM2.88 KLCI : 852.18<br />

Price Target : 12-Month RM 3.30<br />

Potential Catalyst: Higher traffic volume growth and potential<br />

acquistions<br />

Analyst<br />

Chong Tjen-San, CFA +603 2711 2295<br />

tjensan@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Price Relative<br />

3.70<br />

3.50<br />

3.30<br />

3.10<br />

2.90<br />

2.70<br />

2.50<br />

2.30<br />

RM<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

PLUS Expressway (LHS) Relative KLCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (RM m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 2,969 2,989 3,079 3,531<br />

EBITDA 2,544 2,537 2,624 2,966<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,516 1,549 1,625 1,966<br />

Net Profit 1,079 1,146 1,203 1,455<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,079 1,146 1,203 1,455<br />

EPS (sen) 21.6 22.9 24.1 29.1<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (sen) 21.6 22.9 24.1 29.1<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (8) 6 5 21<br />

Diluted EPS (sen) 21.6 22.9 24.1 29.1<br />

Net DPS (sen) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0<br />

BV Per Share (sen) 113.6 120.5 128.6 141.8<br />

PE (X) 13.3 12.6 12.0 9.9<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 13.3 12.6 12.0 9.9<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 9.8 9.5 9.0 7.5<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 8.9 8.8 8.5 7.4<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5<br />

P/Book Value (X) 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1<br />

ROAE (%) 19.6 19.6 19.3 21.5<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (sen): 21.9 22.9 30.6<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Industrial Transportation<br />

Principal Business: Toll road concessionaire<br />

222<br />

202<br />

182<br />

162<br />

142<br />

122<br />

102<br />

82<br />

62<br />

Steady as she goes<br />

PLUS is an excellent liquid proxy to stable, high quality free<br />

cash flow and rising dividends, with its concession<br />

agreement running to 2038. It has been raising dividends<br />

since its listing from 7 sen in FY03 to 16 sen in FY08. 2009<br />

KPI is for DPS of 16 sen, translating to a 5.5% yield, above<br />

our market yield of 3.8%. Dividend payout ratio has been<br />

raised to 70% from 40-60% previously. BUY with a DCFbased<br />

target price of RM3.30.<br />

2009 KPIs realistic. PLUS exceeded its 2008 KPIs. It has set<br />

realistic KPIs for 2009 : 1) to meet balance 4.4% increase in<br />

lane-km, 2) minimum revenue growth of 5%, and 3)<br />

minimum dividend of 16 sen. It also raised its payout policy<br />

to 70% vs 40-60% previously. We are modelling +1%<br />

traffic volume growth in 2009, tying in with our in house<br />

GDP forecast of -1.2%. We view it highly improbable that<br />

PLUS’s traffic volume will test 1998’s -6.3% (GDP -7.4%).<br />

In this scenario, PLUS’s FCF per share will fall by 10% to<br />

27.0 sen, still enough to support our DPS of 16 sen.<br />

Resilient cashflows support dividends. The government<br />

has put PLUS’s toll rate increase on hold indefinitely. Even<br />

assuming if toll rates stay at 13.6sen/km with a one year<br />

delay in cash compensation, PLUS FY09 FCF will fall by<br />

10% to 27.1 sen, more than enough to support our DPS of<br />

16 sen in FY09 or yield of 5.5%. In any case, we expect <strong>the</strong><br />

government to honour <strong>the</strong> concession agreement and that<br />

compensation will be via cash (similar to 2008). There could<br />

be some upside to FCF from <strong>the</strong> restructuring of ELITE’s<br />

BAIDS that will release RM200m cash (4 sen per PLUS<br />

share).<br />

Risk of expropriation low, privatization possible? We<br />

view any risk of expropriation as low given cost and priority<br />

issues. Based on our estimates, expropriation will cost <strong>the</strong><br />

government RM28bn. A potential privatization involving<br />

Khazanah may appear cheaper at a hypo<strong>the</strong>tical RM14bn<br />

(assuming 15% premium to market price and assumption<br />

of related debt) but this, in our view, will be deemed as<br />

unfair use of government’s resources as it will not benefit<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole nation.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 5,000<br />

Mkt. Cap (RMm/US$m) 14,400 / 3,942<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Khazanah Nasional (%) 63.9<br />

EPF (%) 11.2<br />

Free Float (%) 36.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 2,241<br />

Page 98<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: LM / sa: MT


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

PLUS Expressway<br />

Income Statement (RM m) Balance Sheet (RM m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 2,969 2,989 3,079 3,531 Net Fixed Assets 12,428 12,401 12,351 12,241<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (899) (914) (941) (1,029) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 2,070 2,075 2,138 2,502 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 204 204 204 204<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc 91 85 85 4 Cash & ST Invts 2,298 2,256 2,326 1,620<br />

Operating Profit 2,161 2,160 2,224 2,506 Inventory 0 0 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 57 57 57 57<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 2,033 2,588 3,159 4,249<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (645) (611) (599) (540) Total Assets 17,021 17,507 18,098 18,372<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,516 1,549 1,625 1,966 ST Debt 952 952 952 952<br />

Tax (436) (403) (423) (511) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 279 278 278 278<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 LT Debt 9,522 9,316 9,140 8,307<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 573 916 1,278 1,730<br />

Net Profit 1,079 1,146 1,203 1,455 Shareholder’s Equity 5,678 6,026 6,431 7,088<br />

Net Profit before Except. 1,080 1,146 1,203 1,455 Minority Interests 19 19 19 19<br />

EBITDA 2,544 2,537 2,624 2,966 Total Cap. & Liab. 17,022 17,507 18,098 18,372<br />

Sales Gth (%) 30.1 0.7 3.0 14.7 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 1,811 2,367 2,939 4,029<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 27.7 (0.3) 3.4 13.0 Net Cash/(Debt) (8,175) (8,012) (7,765) (7,638)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 27.7 0.0 2.9 12.7<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (13.5) 6.2 4.9 21.0<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 28.7 26.0 26.0 26.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RM m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 1,516 1,549 1,625 1,966 Gross Margins (%) 69.7 69.4 69.4 70.9<br />

Dep. & Amort. 360 377 401 460 Opg Profit Margin (%) 72.8 72.3 72.2 71.0<br />

Tax Paid (436) (60) (60) (60) Net Profit Margin (%) 36.4 38.4 39.1 41.2<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 0 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 19.6 19.6 19.3 21.5<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 10 0 0 0 ROA (%) 6.6 6.6 6.8 8.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 366 (2) (33) (591) ROCE (%) 9.5 9.4 9.4 10.3<br />

Net Operating CF 1,816 1,864 1,933 1,774 Div Payout Ratio (%) 73.9 69.6 66.4 54.9<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (538) (350) (350) (350) Net Interest Cover (x) 3.3 3.5 3.7 4.6<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (117) 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 7.1 7.0 6.8 5.9<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 103.4 94.6 94.0 89.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF (219) 58 60 41 Inventory Turn (avg days) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Net Investing CF (874) (292) (290) (309) Current Ratio (x) 3.6 4.0 4.5 4.8<br />

Div Paid (725) (798) (798) (798) Quick Ratio (x) 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.4<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (412) (817) (774) (1,374) Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 5.1 3.4 3.5 3.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (2) 0 0 0 Z-Score (X) 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />

Net Financing CF (1,139) (1,615) (1,572) (2,172) N. Cash/(Debt)PS (sen) (163.5) (160.2) (155.3) (152.8)<br />

Net Cashflow (197) (42) 71 (706) Opg CFPS (sen) 36.1 37.3 38.7 35.5<br />

Free CFPS (sen) 25.5 30.3 31.7 28.5<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (RM m)<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008<br />

Turnover 719 738 717 793<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (199) (220) (229) (232)<br />

Gross Profit 521 519 488 561<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (4) (6) (7) (6)<br />

Operating Profit 516 512 482 554<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (132) (132) (141) (144)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 384 381 341 410<br />

Tax (109) (114) (99) (113)<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 (1)<br />

Net Profit 276 266 242 296<br />

Net profit bef Except. 275 266 242 296<br />

Sales Gth (%) 13.4 2.6 (2.9) 10.6<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (3.1) (0.8) (6.0) 15.1<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (29.8) (3.4) (9.1) 22.4<br />

Gross Margins (%) 72.4 70.2 68.1 70.7<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 71.8 69.4 67.2 69.9<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 38.3 36.0 33.7 37.3<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 99


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Thailand<br />

Lower downside risks<br />

SET Current : 427.72<br />

SET 3 / 12 mths Target : 480 / 510<br />

Expected Return<br />

: +12% / +19%<br />

With <strong>the</strong> SET Index having fallen 52% from its recent<br />

peak, we believe most of <strong>the</strong> bad news has been priced<br />

in. In addition, <strong>the</strong> political scene has stabilized since<br />

<strong>the</strong> new government took office. Hence, we are seeing<br />

lower downside risks to <strong>the</strong> market. Uncertainties,<br />

however, remain particularly from external<br />

developments. For 2Q09, we still favor defensive plays<br />

and recommend increasing exposure in domestic<br />

counters that will benefit from <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

expansionary fiscal and monetary policies.<br />

The Bank of Thailand had cut policy rate drastically from 3.75% to 1.50% in<br />

three bold moves since Dec08, and we expect ano<strong>the</strong>r 50bps rate cut to 1.0%<br />

in 2Q09. The government has also introduced several fiscal stimulus measures to<br />

lessen <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> global economic slowdown. The positive effects of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se expansionary policies should be felt in 2H09. We recommend investors to<br />

increase exposure in Banking, Energy & Utilities, Consumer Staples, Contractor,<br />

and Property counters. Our top Banking pick is Bangkok Bank (BBL) for its strong<br />

balance sheet and highest NPL coverage ratio of 109% at YE08, while <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

good value in Banpu (BANPU) and Thai Tap Water Supply (TTW) in <strong>the</strong> Energy &<br />

Utilities sector. CP All (CPALL) remains our top pick in <strong>the</strong> Consumer Staple<br />

sector, and we are turning more positive on contractors, particularly Ch.<br />

Karnchang (CK) and Sino-Thai Engineering (STEC), in anticipation of higher<br />

government spending on infrastructure development. In Property, we like<br />

Central Pattana (CPN) for its strong recurring income base, and Preuksa Real<br />

Estate (PS), Asian Property (AP) and Supalai (SPALI) for <strong>the</strong>ir large backlogs<br />

(which imply earnings visibility) and attractive valuations.<br />

Chanpen Sirithanarattanakul +66 (0) 2657 7824 chanpens@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 100<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SGC: sa: TW


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

52-Week<br />

Indices<br />

Close<br />

19-Mar-09<br />

Chg Net<br />

-1 mth<br />

-1 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-3 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-6 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-12 mth<br />

(%)<br />

High<br />

(%)<br />

Low<br />

(%)<br />

SET 428 (3.8) (0.9) (4.9) (28.3) (47.6) 887 380<br />

SET 50 297 (2.4) (0.8) (6.1) (28.8) (49.4) 644 261<br />

SET 100 631 (4.6) (0.7) (5.9) (29.6) (50.2) 1,388 553<br />

SET Banks 147 (2.3) (1.6) 3.8 (30.0) (50.5) 318 124<br />

SET Construction Materials 2,626 (85.0) (3.1) (7.6) (26.0) (53.4) 5,823 2,306<br />

SET Communication 63 0.7 1.1 2.6 (9.1) (28.0) 93 49<br />

SET Energy 9,845 (30.7) (0.3) (11.0) (30.7) (49.0) 22,979 8,453<br />

SET Electronics 312 (23.7) (7.1) (14.3) (39.6) (57.5) 763 305<br />

SET Property 55 (0.2) (0.4) (8.5) (37.1) (59.9) 206 82<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn shares) 2,304<br />

Value (Bt bn) 8,536<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

The SET Index fell 4.9% QTD. Despite easing domestic<br />

political tension, <strong>the</strong> Thai market was overshadowed by<br />

concerns about <strong>the</strong> global economic recession, weaker-thanexpected<br />

economic numbers e.g. dismal exports, weakerthan-expected<br />

4Q08 GDP growth, and poor corporate<br />

results. The SET Index slightly under-performed its regional<br />

peers, as measured by <strong>the</strong> MSCI Far East Asia (ex. Japan)<br />

that fell 3.5% during <strong>the</strong> period.<br />

Regional Comparison<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

Jun-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

MSCI F ar East ex-japan Index<br />

SET Index (RHS)<br />

Nov-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Feb-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

Electronics and Energy sectors led <strong>the</strong> decline, falling 14.3%<br />

and 11.0%, respectively. The Electronics sector was hardest<br />

hit as electronics exports fell dramatically as a result of<br />

weakening global demand; this had led to layoffs at several<br />

electronics companies. The Energy sector also plunged as oil<br />

and commodities companies booked huge inventory losses.<br />

Property share prices fell 8.5% on concerns about <strong>the</strong> sharp<br />

drop in housing demand amidst falling consumer<br />

confidence. However, Banking and Communications were<br />

<strong>the</strong> only two that emerged unsca<strong>the</strong>d, with <strong>the</strong> index rising<br />

3.8% and 2.6% QTD, respectively, thanks to Thai banks’<br />

strong capital base and relatively resilient earnings at <strong>the</strong><br />

Communications sector.<br />

Foreign investors remained net sellers of stocks valued at<br />

Bt8.9bn QTD (vs. Bt37.2bn in 4Q08), on continued concerns<br />

about <strong>the</strong> global economic recession and its potential impact<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Thai economy. What’s positive is that foreign<br />

investors just turned net buyers of Thai stocks during <strong>the</strong><br />

past one week.<br />

Thailand Stock Market: Foreign Net Buy (Sell) Position<br />

Btm<br />

50,000<br />

30,000<br />

10,000<br />

-10,000<br />

-30,000<br />

-50,000<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Net Foreign<br />

Jul-07<br />

Source: SET, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

SET Index (RHS)<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

As of 19 Mar 09<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

SET<br />

1,000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

Page 101


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Thai economy contracted 6% (QoQ, sa) and 4.3% (YoY) in<br />

4Q08, far worse than our and market expectations. This made<br />

Thailand one of <strong>the</strong> worst hit economies in Asia. The<br />

contraction was attributed to <strong>the</strong> general deterioration of <strong>the</strong><br />

global economy, which caused Thai exports (which made up<br />

72% of <strong>the</strong> country’s GDP) to drop dramatically. Additionally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> rapid deterioration was exacerbated by political uncertainty<br />

and frequent change of government in <strong>the</strong> country. This<br />

domestic uncertainty has delayed <strong>the</strong> disbursement of<br />

government budget and implementation of public projects.<br />

Thailand: Real GDP Growth – sharp contraction in 4Q08<br />

Real GDP Growth 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 2008<br />

(% Chg y-o-y)<br />

Private<br />

2.7 2.5 2.7 2.2 2.5<br />

Consumption<br />

Govt Consumption -0.4 -3.7 -2.9 10.4 0.4<br />

GFCF 5.4 1.9 0.6 -3.3 1.1<br />

Private 6.5 4.3 3.5 -1.3 3.2<br />

Public 1.9 -5.2 -5.5 -10.2 -4.8<br />

Change in<br />

377.0 -123.0 241.4 65.4 1,063.6<br />

Inventories<br />

Exports 8.9 11.9 11.2 -8.6 5.5<br />

Imports 9.3 6.7 13.1 1.0 7.5<br />

GDP 6.2 5.5 3.8 -4.3 2.6<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

2008 real GDP grew only 2.6% y-o-y. Thailand’s GDP<br />

slowed down significantly from 4.9% growth in 2007 to<br />

only 2.6% in 2008. This was below market expectation,<br />

which had expected 3.6% growth for <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

Exports hit badly in 2M09. According to Ministry of Commerce<br />

statistics, Thailand’s exports was hit badly, tumbling 19.2% y-o-<br />

y in US dollars in <strong>the</strong> first two months of this year. Exports fell<br />

sharply in all major categories, and in all major markets.<br />

Thailand: Exports<br />

US$bn<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2M09<br />

Exports (US$bn)<br />

y-o-y growth (RHS)<br />

Source: Ministry of Commerce, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

-10%<br />

-20%<br />

-30%<br />

4Q08 earnings tumbled due to inventory losses. Aggregate<br />

4Q08 bottom line of listed companies under <strong>DBS</strong>V coverage<br />

tumbled to Bt39bn net loss due to (i) a deteriorating economy,<br />

(ii) large Bt76bn inventory loss booked by oil and commodities<br />

companies, and (iii) extra losses of Bt12.2bn and Bt3.6bn,<br />

booked by THAI and ADVANC, respectively. Full year 2008 SET<br />

earnings fell 28%. Excluding Bt92bn inventory and extra<br />

losses, SET earnings plunged 46% y-o-y and 24% q-o-q in<br />

4Q08, but fell only 2.8% for full year 2008.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Universe: Quarterly aggregate net profit growth*<br />

Thailand: Contribution to Real GDP (2008)<br />

Chg in<br />

Inv entories<br />

1%<br />

Investment<br />

22%<br />

Net Exports<br />

15%<br />

Govt<br />

Consumption<br />

9%<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Stat.<br />

Discrepancies<br />

1%<br />

Private<br />

Consumption<br />

52%<br />

Btbn %<br />

120<br />

80<br />

100<br />

40<br />

80<br />

60<br />

0<br />

40<br />

-40<br />

20<br />

-80<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-120<br />

-40<br />

-160<br />

1Q06<br />

2Q06<br />

3Q06<br />

4Q06<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

Banks Energy Telecom<br />

Property Building mat. O<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Growth (RHS)<br />

Note: * Only stocks under our coverage, excludes new listing<br />

Source: SET and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 102


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sectors: growth vs. contraction. In 4Q08, sectors that<br />

reported growth y-o-y were Commerce (+35% y-o-y, +8.2%<br />

q-o-q), Property (+16.4%, 0.9%), Banks (+5.8%, -19%) and<br />

Media (+0.2%, -7.5%). Contractors experienced narrower<br />

losses in <strong>the</strong> quarter, while <strong>the</strong> rest reported y-o-y earnings<br />

contraction. The sectors that reported aggregate net losses<br />

were (i) Transportation, (ii) Energy, (iii) Construction<br />

Materials, (iv) Telecom, and (v) Petrochemical.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Universe: Aggregate 4Q08 SET net profit<br />

YE Dec<br />

(Btm)<br />

4Q07 3Q08 4Q08 Chg<br />

y-o-y<br />

Chg<br />

q-o-q<br />

Banking 14,926 19,593 15,784 6% -19%<br />

Finance 1,094 740 356 -67% -52%<br />

Petrochem. 298 276 -308 -203% -212%<br />

Con. Mat. 6,391 6,147 -5,746 -190% -193%<br />

Property 3,836 4,428 4,466 16% 1%<br />

Contractors -356 -2,146 -177 Nm. Nm.<br />

Ind. estate 895 919 450 -50% -51%<br />

Energy 46,736 21,598 -42,595 -191% -297%<br />

Commerce 1,309 1,639 1,773 35% 8.2%<br />

Media 1,126 1,220 1,129 0% -8%<br />

Transport 7,781 4,009 -15,418 -298% -485%<br />

Telecom 7,386 5,099 -157 -102% -103%<br />

Electronics 2,166 2,105 1,175 -46% -44%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,577 3,531 270 -90% -92%<br />

Total 96,166 69,159 -38,996 -141% -156%<br />

Source: Companies and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Improving political scene YTD. In our view, <strong>the</strong> Democrat-led<br />

coalition government seems to be acceptable to both <strong>the</strong><br />

anti-Thaksin group, led by <strong>the</strong> People's Alliance for<br />

Democracy (PAD), and <strong>the</strong> military. More importantly, we feel<br />

that most citizens would like to give <strong>the</strong> Democrats a chance.<br />

So far, <strong>the</strong>re had been no serious issues that would cause<br />

<strong>the</strong>m to lose popularity.<br />

Government stimulus packages. The Thai government has<br />

introduced several fiscal stimulus packages to lessen <strong>the</strong><br />

impact of <strong>the</strong> global economic recession and restore domestic<br />

economic growth. These include (i) supplementary budget of<br />

Bt116.7bn, (ii) tax measures to stimulate spending in target<br />

sectors e.g. property, (iii) plans to utilize Special Financial<br />

Institutions (SFI) to support and guarantee loans in order to<br />

increase credit in <strong>the</strong> system by Bt300bn. In addition, <strong>the</strong><br />

government plans to expedite disbursement of budget, and<br />

push forward investment projects e.g. mega projects worth<br />

Bt1.6tr. We are positive about <strong>the</strong>se measures, many of which<br />

are expected to help domestic consumption recover from<br />

2Q09 onwards. The government plans to borrow up to<br />

US$2bn (Bt70bn) from World Bank, Asian Development Bank<br />

(ADB), and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to<br />

revive <strong>the</strong> economy and for infrastructure development.<br />

Impact on Thailand’s economy. The fiscal stimulus measures<br />

will be positive for <strong>the</strong> economy. Some of <strong>the</strong> near-term<br />

measures focus on boosting confidence and local consumption<br />

e.g. Bt2,000 handout to those earning less than<br />

Bt15,000/month, and Bt500m/month handout to citizens over<br />

60 years old. The beneficiaries of this move will be Consumerrelated<br />

counters, including CP All (CPALL), Big C Supercenter<br />

(BIGC) and Advanced Info Service (ADVANC). The medium<br />

term stimulus measure is to push forward investment projects,<br />

and beneficiaries of <strong>the</strong>se spending plans will be constructioncontractors.<br />

We expect actual construction to commence<br />

mostly from next year onwards, but <strong>the</strong>re should be more<br />

progress for bids and contract signing this year for some<br />

projects. This means <strong>the</strong>re should be positive news flow from<br />

2Q09 onwards. Coupled with falling construction material<br />

costs, which should ease margin pressure, we upgraded <strong>the</strong><br />

Contractor sector to Neutral from Cautious. Our top picks for<br />

<strong>the</strong> sector are Ch. Karnchang (CK) and Sino-Thai Engineering<br />

& Construction (STEC).<br />

Public debt/GDP will rise but remain manageable. Thailand’s<br />

public debt to GDP currently stands at 38%. But with <strong>the</strong><br />

planned borrowings for various spending by <strong>the</strong><br />

government, Thailand’s public debt to GDP is expected to<br />

rise to 42.7% and 44.7% by end-Oct 2009 and Oct 2010,<br />

respectively. However, <strong>the</strong>se would still be within <strong>the</strong><br />

sustainable fiscal framework at 50% of GDP.<br />

Public Debt to GDP will rise, but still sustainable<br />

Bt bn<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009F<br />

2010F<br />

50%<br />

48%<br />

46%<br />

44%<br />

42%<br />

40%<br />

38%<br />

36%<br />

34%<br />

32%<br />

30%<br />

Public Debt (Bt bn) GDP Public Debt/GDP (RHS)<br />

Source: Public Debt Management Office, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 103


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Fiscal Stimulus Measures<br />

Remarks<br />

Btm<br />

1. Supplementary budget (Bt116.7bn)<br />

1.1 Bt2,000 handout for those earning less than Bt15,000/month Recipients:<br />

18,970<br />

8.1m Social Security Fund members<br />

1.3m civil servants (including retirees)<br />

1.2 Extend 5 public service subsidy program for 6 months 11,409<br />

1.3 1-month training and 3-months wage subsidy Recipients – around 240,000 people 6,900<br />

1.4 Free education for 15 years Recipients – around 10m students 19,000<br />

1.5 Bt600 per month stipend for community healthcare workers Recipients - around 830,000 workers 3,000<br />

1.6 Improve standards of 2,609 health service stations 1,095<br />

1.7 Sufficient Economy Fund to improve quality of life Recipients - 78,358 villages 15,200<br />

1.8 Old-age support payment of Bt500 per month Recipients - around 5m people 9,000<br />

1.9 Infrastructure development Rural irrigation network 2,000<br />

Small reservoir construction 760<br />

Rural road construction 1,500<br />

1.10 Public housing estate for low-ranked police force Total of 532 public housing estates 1,808<br />

1.11 Support tourism industry 1,000<br />

1.12 Ministry of Commerce measures to reduce living expenses 1,000<br />

1.13 Development of food industry and SMEs 500<br />

1.14 Rebuilding confidence in and image of Thailand 325<br />

1.15 For emergency use or as necessary 4,091<br />

1.16 Funds to cover treasury account withdrawals 19,140<br />

Total 116,698<br />

2. Tax measures<br />

2.1 Real Estate Payment for new residential properties is tax deductible up to<br />

Bt300,000, provided that <strong>the</strong> units are transferred in 2009<br />

Extension of property tax-cut package to 28 Mar 2010<br />

Mortgage interest expense is tax-deductible up to Bt100,000<br />

2.2 SMEs Increase minimum taxable revenue to Bt1m (from Bt0.6m)<br />

2.3 Community Businesses Increase minimum taxable revenue to Bt1.8m (from Bt1.2m)<br />

2.4 Venture Capital Minimum investment requirement in SME for 1 st year is<br />

waived for registered venture capital firms<br />

Tax on transfer of SME shares is waived<br />

2.5 Tourism Expenses related to domestic seminars in 2009 (including<br />

hotel rooms) are tax-deductible at twice actual value<br />

2.6 Debt Restructuring Taxes and fees are waived for income from debt reduction or<br />

retirement, and from transfer of assets in connection to debt<br />

restructuring (2009)<br />

2.7 Business Re-organization Taxes and fees related to transfer under partial business<br />

reorganization are waived (2009)<br />

Page 104


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Fiscal Stimulus Measures (Continued)<br />

Remarks<br />

Btm<br />

3. Special Financial Institutions<br />

3.1 Government Savings Bank Small personal loans<br />

Non-collateralized loans for small businesses<br />

3.2 Bank for Agriculture & Agricultural Co-operatives Small personal loans 10,000<br />

Non-collateralized loans for small businesses 25,000<br />

Support rubber prices 4,000<br />

Increase subsidies for agriculture 10,000<br />

3.3 EXIM Bank Export credit insurance scheme 150,000<br />

3.4 SME Bank Soft loan to banks to encourage lending 100,000<br />

3.5 Small Business Guarantee Corp Provide partial guarantees on loans to small bus. 12,000<br />

4. Expedite Budget Disbursements<br />

4.1 State budget 1,835,000<br />

4.2 State-Owned-Enterprises Investment budget 308,000<br />

4.3 Municipal investment budget 366,000<br />

5. Push forward investment projects<br />

Mega projects plan worth Bt1.6 trillion during 2010-2012<br />

5.1 Mass transit<br />

5.2 Airport Link<br />

5.3 Transportation<br />

5.4 Water Resources<br />

5.5 Education<br />

5.6 Healthcare<br />

5.7 Housing<br />

Source: Ministry of Finance, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 105


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

LIQUIDITY<br />

Thailand: Policy rate likely to fall fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Easing inflation concerns. Inflation has been falling steadily<br />

since 2H08, with headline CPI contracting 0.4% and 0.1%<br />

y-o-y in Jan and Feb 2009, respectively. The sharp drop in<br />

headline CPI was attributed to (i) lower global oil prices, and<br />

(ii) government’s 6-month fiscal package (e.g. free electricity<br />

and water for low volume household users, free bus and<br />

train rides). Meanwhile, core CPI rose 1.6% and 1.8% in Jan<br />

and Feb 2009, respectively. We expect headline inflation to<br />

rise in 2H09, and lift 2009 annual average inflation rate to<br />

contract 0.7% vs 5.5% increase in 2008.<br />

5.0%<br />

4.0%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09F<br />

2Q09F<br />

Thailand: Inflation is no longer a concern<br />

Source: Bank of Thailand, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

% (y-o-y)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

Jan-07<br />

Headline CPI<br />

Core CPI<br />

Mar-07<br />

May-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Sep-07<br />

Nov-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Source: Ministry of Commerce, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Sep-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Thai baht vs US dollar<br />

Bt<br />

42<br />

40<br />

38<br />

36<br />

34<br />

32<br />

30<br />

1/2/06<br />

3/27/06<br />

6/19/06<br />

9/11/06<br />

12/4/06<br />

2/26/07<br />

5/21/07<br />

8/13/07<br />

11/5/07<br />

1/28/08<br />

4/21/08<br />

7/11/08<br />

10/3/08<br />

12/26/08<br />

3/20/09<br />

MPC prompted to cut policy rate by 125bps in 1Q09<br />

following 100bps cut in 4Q08. Falling inflation has given<br />

room for <strong>the</strong> Bank of Thailand to implement an<br />

expansionary monetary policy. On 14 Jan and 25 Feb 2009,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) cut 1-day repurchase<br />

rate (policy rate) by 75bps and 50bps, respectively, to 1.50%<br />

with immediate effect. The MPC said <strong>the</strong> easing monetary<br />

policy was mainly to support an economic recovery, as <strong>the</strong><br />

economy is facing domestic and external risks. We expect<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r 50bps rate cut to reduce policy rate to 1% by end-<br />

2Q09. This would be <strong>the</strong> lowest in Thailand’s history.<br />

Source: Reuters<br />

Thailand: International Reserve<br />

US$bn<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Thai baht performance. The Thai baht performed relatively<br />

better than many of its Asian counterparts. The Thai baht<br />

has depreciated 3.7% YTD (to 4 Mar), which is below <strong>the</strong><br />

5.7% average depreciation for <strong>the</strong> 11 Asian currencies we<br />

monitor. And Thailand’s international reserve has grown<br />

steadily in <strong>the</strong> past 10 years, from only US$25bn at end<br />

2007 to US$113bn at end Feb 2009. Our economist expects<br />

Thai baht to end <strong>the</strong> year at Bt35.5 to <strong>the</strong> USD.<br />

0<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

Source: Bank of Thailand, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

Feb-09<br />

Page 106


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

GROWTH and VALUATION<br />

Thailand’s GDP growth cut to -3.5% for 2009. With<br />

continued bleak export outlook, <strong>DBS</strong> economist expects<br />

1Q09 to register 6.2% contraction (y-o-y), mainly due to<br />

inventory adjustments. We <strong>the</strong>n should see y-o-y GDP<br />

contraction for ano<strong>the</strong>r two quarters (-5.6% in 2Q09 and –<br />

4.9% in 3Q09), before returning to positive growth of<br />

+2.7% in 4Q09. This implies full year average growth of -<br />

3.5% for 2009, and +3.8% for 2010.<br />

Thailand: GDP Growth (y-o-y)<br />

Commerce (+17.4%) led by CPALL, and Transportation<br />

(+11.4%) led by THAI following heavy losses last year. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

sectors will likely see EPS fall on <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong> slowing<br />

global and domestic economies. The hardest hit would be<br />

Electronics (-46.5%), which depends on export, and demand<br />

has contracted sharply since late last year.<br />

Our estimated EPS contraction for 2009 is in line with regional<br />

peers, which EPS is expected to contract by an average of 8%,<br />

before rebounding 8% in 2010.<br />

Regional Earnings Growth<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

-4%<br />

-6%<br />

-8%<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09F<br />

2Q09F<br />

3Q09F<br />

4Q09F<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

(5)<br />

(10)<br />

(15)<br />

(20)<br />

China H<br />

Thailand<br />

Hongkong<br />

Indonesia<br />

09F<br />

Malaysia<br />

10F<br />

Singapore<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Thailand: Annual GDP Growth (y-o-y)<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

-4%<br />

-6%<br />

-8%<br />

-10%<br />

-12%<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009F<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Expect 2009 EPS to contract by 3.6%, in line with regional<br />

peers. Aggregate EPS for <strong>DBS</strong>V Thailand universe tumbled<br />

29.5% in 2008, due mainly to huge inventory losses at<br />

energy and construction material (particularly steel)<br />

companies. Looking forward, we expect ano<strong>the</strong>r 3.6% EPS<br />

contraction in 2009, before a rebound to 7.2% growth in<br />

2010. In 2009, sectors that will see strong earnings growth<br />

are Energy (+18.7%) after huge inventory losses last year,<br />

Petrochemicals (+19.9%) led by IRP’s capacity expansion,<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

But listed companies are in much better shape now than<br />

before. Most Thai-listed companies are in much better<br />

financial position now than <strong>the</strong>y were 10 years ago. The<br />

following chart shows <strong>the</strong> total liabilities/total equity ratio of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se companies; <strong>the</strong> ratio has improved steadily since 10<br />

years ago, when Thai companies had large US dollar loans.<br />

Total Liabilities/Equity Ratio is Falling Steadily<br />

(x)<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

Source: Stock Exchange of Thailand , <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

Page 107


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Current market P/BV is close to 1997-8 crisis level. The Thai<br />

market is now trading at 0.9x P/BV, <strong>the</strong> lowest since Sep<br />

1998, when Thailand was <strong>the</strong> epicenter of <strong>the</strong> 1997-8 Asian<br />

crisis. However, most Thai companies are in much better<br />

shape now compared to 10 years ago, with much stronger<br />

balance sheets, lower gearing, and limited exposure to<br />

offshore borrowings.<br />

Thailand: Market P/BV is now close to 1997-8 crisis level<br />

X<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

Jan-97<br />

Jan-99<br />

Jan-01<br />

Jan-03<br />

Jan-05<br />

Jan-07<br />

Thai market is still cheap relative to regional peers. The chart<br />

below shows that valuations in <strong>the</strong> Thai market are still<br />

cheap compared to regional peers. It is now trading at 2009<br />

PE of 8.3x vs 10.1x regional PE. It also offers generous 2009<br />

dividend yield of 5.5% vs regional average of 4.2%.<br />

Regional valuation comparison<br />

09 PE (x)<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

Expensive<br />

China H<br />

Malaysia<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Singapore<br />

Indonesia<br />

Thailand<br />

Cheap<br />

1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5<br />

09 Dividend yield (%)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Source: SET, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

EPS Growth %<br />

PE (x)<br />

2008A 2009F 2010F 2008A 2009F 20109F<br />

Banking 20.8 (16.0) (2.3) 6.9 7.8 7.4<br />

Construction Materials (47.6) (14.3) 7.4 6.3 6.7 6.5<br />

Chemicals & Plastics 43.9 19.9 33.4 4.2 3.5 2.6<br />

Commerce 51.0 17.4 11.2 13.3 11.3 10.1<br />

Communication (14.2) (31.2) 8.8 14.2 13.4 12.3<br />

Electronics Components (18.6) (46.5) 17.0 3.6 6.1 5.2<br />

Energy (43.2) 18.7 23.8 9.0 7.6 6.1<br />

Entertainment & Recreation (0.4) (10.2) 7.8 11.0 12.1 11.2<br />

Finance & <strong>Securities</strong> (29.2) 7.0 15.6 8.2 7.6 6.6<br />

Food and Beverage (11.2) (0.6) 17.6 9.6 9.8 8.3<br />

Property Development (0.3) (2.0) 2.9 7.8 7.9 7.7<br />

Transportation 2.7 11.4 5.5 8.2 7.4 7.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 41.2 (8.8) 5.6 8.3 9.1 8.6<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Universe (29.5) (3.6) 7.2 8.5 8.3 7.3<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 108


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

INVESTMENT STRATEGY<br />

Most bad news priced in. With <strong>the</strong> SET Index having fallen<br />

51.7% from its recent peak (887 points in May 2008) to<br />

427.72 as at 19 Mar 2009, we believe most of <strong>the</strong> bad news<br />

has been priced in. In addition, <strong>the</strong> political scene has<br />

stabilised since <strong>the</strong> new government took office. Hence, we<br />

are seeing lower downside risk to <strong>the</strong> Thai market. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are still uncertainties stemming from external<br />

developments.<br />

Increase exposure in domestic counters that will benefit<br />

from expansionary fiscal and monetary policies. We still<br />

favor defensive plays, and recommend investors increase<br />

exposure in domestic counters that will benefit from <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s expansionary fiscal and monetary policies. The<br />

positive impact of <strong>the</strong>se policies should be felt in 2H09. We<br />

recommend increasing exposure in Banking, Energy &<br />

Utilities, Consumer Staples, Contractor, and Property<br />

counters.<br />

Our top banking pick is Bangkok Bank (BBL) for its strong<br />

balance sheet and highest NPL coverage ratio of 109% at<br />

YE08, while for Energy & Utilities, we see good value in<br />

Banpu Coal (BANPU) and Thai Tap Water Supply (TTW).<br />

CP All (CPALL) remains our top pick in <strong>the</strong> Consumer Staple<br />

sector. We are turning more positive on contractors,<br />

particularly Ch. Karnchang (CK) and Sino-Thai Engineering<br />

(STEC), as we expect positive newsflow relating to<br />

potentially higher government spending on infrastructure<br />

development.<br />

For Property, we like Central Pattana (CPN) for its strong<br />

recurring income base. We also like Preuksa Real Estate (PS),<br />

Asian Property (AP) and Supalai (SPALI) for <strong>the</strong>ir large<br />

backlogs (which imply clearer earnings visibility) and<br />

attractive valuations.<br />

Bottom-up approach suggests 19% upside for SET Index by<br />

end-2009. We derived a SET Target Index of 510 based on<br />

a bottom-up approach. This suggests 19% upside for <strong>the</strong><br />

Thai market from current levels.<br />

3 main investment <strong>the</strong>mes for <strong>the</strong> Thai stock market. These<br />

are (i) defensive plays, (ii) undervalued plays, and (iii)<br />

beneficiaries of expansionary fiscal and monetary policies.<br />

3 Main investment Themes and Key Picks<br />

Theme<br />

Stock<br />

1. Defensive plays ADVANC, BEC, CPALL,<br />

TTW<br />

2. Undervalued stocks SPALI, IRP<br />

3. Beneficiary of government policies<br />

- Banks BBL, KBANK<br />

- Commerce BIGC, CPALL<br />

- Telecom ADVANC<br />

- Construction contractor CK, STEC<br />

- Property<br />

PS, AP<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Maintain quality defensive plays as core holding. Our top<br />

picks based on this <strong>the</strong>me are stocks that are less sensitive to<br />

<strong>the</strong> global and local economic slowdown. They are also<br />

leaders in <strong>the</strong>ir respective markets and earnings visibility is<br />

high. These include ADVANC, BEC, CPALL, and TTW.<br />

Defensive Plays<br />

Stock Mkt Cap Price TP Upside Div. Yield<br />

(%)<br />

(US$m) (Btm) (Btm) 2009F<br />

ADVANC TB 7,260 84.50 93.00 10% 7.5<br />

BEC TB 1,108 19.10 20.50 7% 7.2<br />

CPALL TB 1,616 12.40 14.89 20% 6.4<br />

TTW TB 528 4.56 5.84 28% 5.8<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Increase exposure in undervalued stocks. We also<br />

recommend investors accumulate selected stocks which had<br />

been beaten down, and are now trading at extremely<br />

attractive valuations. These include IRP, and SPALI. Both are<br />

now trading at 2009 PE of only 3-4x, while offering<br />

generous dividend yields of 8.5% and 14.5%, respectively.<br />

Undervalued Counters<br />

Bloomberg Mkt.<br />

Cap.<br />

Price TP Upside Share<br />

price<br />

drop<br />

Code (US$m) (Bt) (Bt) -12M<br />

IRP TB 188 4.70 6.70 43% -47%<br />

PS TB 248 3.90 6.44 65% -58%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 109


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

<br />

<br />

Accumulate stocks that will benefit from expansionary fiscal<br />

and monetary policies. These include Banking, Commerce,<br />

Contractor, and Property counters. Our top picks here are<br />

BIGC, CPALL, BBL, KBANK, CK, STEC, AP, and PS.<br />

Beneficiaries of Government Policies<br />

Bloomberg Mkt. Cap. Price TP Upside Share<br />

price drop<br />

Code (US$m) (Bt) (Bt) -12M<br />

BIGC TB 895 38.50 43.95 14% -17.7%<br />

CPALL TB 1,616 12.40 14.89 20% 12.8%<br />

BBL TB 4,236 76.50 88.00 15% -40.2%<br />

KBANK TB 3,020 43.50 62.00 43% -48.8%<br />

CK TB 133 3.18 3.50 10% -57.9%<br />

STEC TB 116 3.36 3.88 15% -32.5%<br />

AP TB 150 2.22 2.25 1% -67.3%<br />

PS TB 248 3.90 6.44 65% -57.8%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Stock picks for 2Q09. We feature six companies in 2Q09<br />

strategy. Three of <strong>the</strong>m (BBL, BANPU, and ADVANC) are bigcap<br />

counters, and <strong>the</strong> rest (IRP, PS, and TUF) are mid-cap.<br />

Advanced Info Service (ADVANC TB) will be less affected<br />

by <strong>the</strong> slowing economy as telecom services have low<br />

elasticity of demand, and ADVANC has quality<br />

subscribers. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, its minimum Bt6.3 DPS policy for<br />

each of FY09F and FY10F translates into guaranteed 7.5%<br />

yield for those years. The award of 3G licenses, expected<br />

in 4Q09, could be a medium term share price catalyst.<br />

Reiterate BUY with a DCF-based target price of Bt93.<br />

Bangkok Bank (BBL TB). The bank aims to rein in loan<br />

growth and focus more on asset quality amidst a weaker<br />

economy in Thailand. Hence, we forecast loans will<br />

contract 1.0% (from +13.4% in 2008) in FY09F vs its<br />

internal 2-4% growth target. This is premised on slower<br />

demand for corporate and SME loans and higher<br />

repayment of working capital loans in 2009. We also<br />

expect FY09F net profit to contract 15.0% after imputing<br />

(i) higher LLP of 0.75% of total loans, and (ii) 27 bps<br />

narrower NIM. However, BBL has a strong capital base to<br />

support potentially weaker asset quality and high liquidity<br />

to compete for deposits. Maintain BUY with a target price<br />

of Bt88.00, based on 0.9x 2009 P/BV.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Banpu (BANPU TB). 57% of BANPU’s Indonesian target<br />

coal sales volume for 2009 has been secured at<br />

US$79/tonne, and its coal hedging contracts (15% of<br />

sales target) should help to mitigate downside risk arising<br />

from weak spot coal prices (currently below US$65/tonne,<br />

- 50% y-o-y). Its power business should continue to<br />

provide stable cash flow. Following 39% profit growth in<br />

FY08, FY09F net profit is expected to surge 36% driven by<br />

higher coal sales volume, improved ASP and margins,<br />

lower expenses (hedging loss and high tax expense in<br />

2008), and full year contribution from AACI.<br />

Preuksa Real Estate (PS TB). PS is currently our top pick in<br />

<strong>the</strong> residential property sector, thanks to its competent<br />

management, large product range, solid balance sheet<br />

(net gearing of only 0.2x), and attractive valuation. Its<br />

market share has been increasing steadily in all product<br />

segments, thanks to its successful marketing and<br />

segmentation strategies. Its prospects remain positive<br />

despite <strong>the</strong> relative weak industry outlook that could lead<br />

to weaker bookings this year. However, we believe PS will<br />

continue to outperform <strong>the</strong> industry. The stock now offers<br />

a hefty 65% upside to our target price.<br />

Indorama Polymers (IRP TB). Despite <strong>the</strong> poor global<br />

economic outlook and <strong>the</strong> petrochemicals industry being<br />

in a down cycle, we are convinced PET demand and<br />

spread will not be as severe as for upstream<br />

petrochemicals for <strong>the</strong> following reasons: (i) limited new<br />

supply and closure of old capacities, (ii) PET is a necessary<br />

daily use product, and (iii) <strong>the</strong> lower PET price should help<br />

sustain demand. We expect PET sales volume and spread<br />

to be more resilient than o<strong>the</strong>r upstream petrochemicals,<br />

and net profit should surge 202% and 33% in FY09-10F,<br />

respectively, driven by capacity expansion.<br />

Thai Union Frozen Products (TUF TB). We remain<br />

optimistic about TUF’s growth prospect despite <strong>the</strong> global<br />

economic slowdown. In FY09, its core strategy is to<br />

integrate operations between group companies in order<br />

to save costs and streng<strong>the</strong>n its supply chain. Additionally,<br />

TUF will try to expand sales in markets which currencies<br />

are strong and economies less vulnerable to <strong>the</strong> global<br />

downturn. It will also launch new products to improve<br />

margins and expand market share.<br />

Page 110


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banks & Finance<br />

Neutral<br />

Commerce<br />

Overweight<br />

Communication<br />

Neutral<br />

Construction Materials<br />

Underweight<br />

Contractor<br />

Neutral<br />

(Upgrade from Underweight)<br />

We reiterate our Neutral stance for <strong>the</strong> Thai Banking sector. We forecast<br />

2009 loans will contract 0.2% (from +10.9% in 2008), based on revised<br />

3.5% GDP contraction for Thailand, and inorganic growth at BAY and<br />

TISCO. Excluding inorganic growth, industry loans should contract 1.5% in<br />

2009, due mainly to lower demand for working capital loans and higher loan<br />

repayment by corporates and SMEs. We are also concerned about asset<br />

deterioration in 2009 following a slower-than-expected economy that could<br />

result in higher credit costs in 2009. However, we do not expect Thai banks’<br />

fundamentals to fall to <strong>the</strong> Asian crisis levels because <strong>the</strong>y are now in a much<br />

stronger position, with stronger risk management systems via stricter credit<br />

approval processes and diversified loan portfolios. Thai corporates are also in<br />

much better financial health with lower average gearing ratio compared to<br />

10 years ago. Our top picks are BBL and KBANK. We like BBL for its strong<br />

balance sheet with <strong>the</strong> highest NPL coverage ratio and strong capital base to<br />

cover rising NPL with little need for re-capitalization. KBANK has good asset<br />

quality with <strong>the</strong> lowest NPL ratio among peers and attractive valuation.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> falling consumer confidence, we maintain Overweight for <strong>the</strong><br />

Commerce sector. All three companies under our coverage (CPALL, BIGC,<br />

and HMPRO) are major players in <strong>the</strong>ir respective markets. We expect <strong>the</strong>m<br />

to continue to grow revenue and earnings impressively this year and next, led<br />

by continuous network expansion and effective cost control. Our top pick is<br />

CPALL for its strong balance sheet, and earnings growth prospects led by<br />

continued store expansion and <strong>the</strong> recent successful divestment of lossmaking<br />

Lotus Supercenter business in China.<br />

The Telecom sector will be less affected by <strong>the</strong> economy turmoil compared to<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r sectors in <strong>the</strong> market, because telecom services have low elasticity of<br />

demand. Given its subscriber quality, ADVANC’s revenue should be <strong>the</strong> least<br />

affected, followed by DTAC. Meanwhile, TrueMove would be hurt <strong>the</strong> most.<br />

Valuations in <strong>the</strong> Thai Telecom sector are undemanding. But <strong>the</strong>re is no share<br />

price catalyst in <strong>the</strong> near term, except for <strong>the</strong> award of 3G licenses on<br />

2.1GHz, expected in 4Q09. But <strong>the</strong>re is risk of fur<strong>the</strong>r delays. Hence, we<br />

reiterate our Neutral stance on <strong>the</strong> Thai Telecom sector. Until <strong>the</strong>re is clearer<br />

visibility of <strong>the</strong> award of 3G licenses (on 2.1GHz), our recommendation is to<br />

stick with defensive stock like ADVANC, still our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

The global economic outlook has continued to deteriorate. <strong>DBS</strong>’ latest<br />

forecast for Thailand’s GDP growth is –3.5% for 2009 vs +2.6% for 2008.<br />

Demand from both consumer and commercial sectors are expected to<br />

tumble. Despite <strong>the</strong> government’s plan to push forward infrastructure<br />

spending, <strong>the</strong> real impact on construction materials demand will only surface<br />

next year at <strong>the</strong> earliest. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> poor demand could lead to more<br />

intense competition among cement producers, but we do not expect a price<br />

war that is as fierce as in 2002, although margins could be under pressure if<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic slump prolongs. We remain Cautious on <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

We upgrade <strong>the</strong> sector to Neutral from Underweight for two main reasons.<br />

Firstly, we expect more public construction projects to be open for bids from<br />

this year onwards, given that <strong>the</strong> government seriously needs to spend to<br />

boost <strong>the</strong> country’s economy amidst <strong>the</strong> global economic recession.<br />

Secondly, construction material prices have fallen sharply since 2H08, which<br />

means less pressure on contractors’ margins. The Mass Rapid & Transit<br />

Authority (MRTA)’s decision to open bids for <strong>the</strong> Purple line is a step in <strong>the</strong><br />

right direction. Our top picks for <strong>the</strong> sector are Ch. Karnchang (CK), which<br />

had recently been declared <strong>the</strong> lowest bidder for <strong>the</strong> first Purple line contract<br />

worth about Bt16bn, and Sino-Thai Engineering (STEC), which should see<br />

earnings jump this year on <strong>the</strong> back of margin improvement.<br />

BBL, KBANK<br />

CPALL<br />

ADVANC<br />

-<br />

CK, STEC<br />

Page 111


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Electronics Components We maintain Underweight on <strong>the</strong> Electronics sector, as <strong>the</strong> sharp drop in -<br />

Underweight<br />

global demand could reduce sales volumes in <strong>the</strong> next few quarters. Thai<br />

electronics exporters have tried to diversify away from <strong>the</strong> US, but given that<br />

<strong>the</strong> slowdown is now global, Thai exporters are unlikely to escape <strong>the</strong><br />

downturn. 2M09 total electronics export value fell 35.5% y-o-y. Exports to<br />

major markets have dropped sharply e.g. USA (-30.5%), China (-44.5%),<br />

Japan (-35.4%). Outlook remains poor. There had been layoffs by several<br />

operators e.g. Hana Microelectronics (HANA), K.C.E. Electronics (KCE).<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> weakening baht against <strong>the</strong> greenback is positive for <strong>the</strong><br />

industry, it is insufficient to offset <strong>the</strong> impact of weakening demand.<br />

Energy<br />

We believe crude oil price may have hit bottom at US$40/bbl, barring fur<strong>the</strong>r PTT, BANPU<br />

Overweight<br />

(Upgrade from Neutral)<br />

shocking economic news. But it could still move range bound, as we expect<br />

continued negative news flow throughout 1H09. We expect Brent crude oil<br />

price to average US$50/bbl in 2009 vs US$97 in 2008. Earnings outlook for<br />

Oil & Gas companies for 2Q09 remains uninspiring given <strong>the</strong> strong earnings<br />

base in <strong>the</strong> past year as both crude oil price and refining margin peaked in<br />

2Q08. However, <strong>the</strong>ir fundamentals are sound with strong balance sheets<br />

and undemanding valuations. Due to slipping share prices, some counters<br />

that were previously deemed unattractive are now offering better value, such<br />

as ESSO (upgrade to HOLD from FV) and PTTEP (upgrade to BUY from Hold).<br />

PTT and BANPU remain our top picks in <strong>the</strong> sector. We still like PTT for its<br />

solid fundamentals and attractive long-term growth prospect. BANPU should<br />

continue to deliver strong earnings growth in 2009, and we expect its strong<br />

management to seize <strong>the</strong> opportunity amid <strong>the</strong> economic weakness to grow<br />

its coal reserves via attractive acquisitions. We upgrade <strong>the</strong> sector to Positive<br />

from Neutral given <strong>the</strong> lower risks and improved valuations.<br />

Entertainment<br />

Thailand’s ad spending has continued to contract, from -5.5% in Jul 2008 to MCOT<br />

Neutral<br />

-7.3% in December. Earnings risk remains high because a deteriorating<br />

economy will lead to cost cutting by corporates (including ad budgets) and<br />

weaker consumer purchasing power. For example, ADVANC plans to cut its<br />

ad budget by 20% in 2009 to save costs. The sector’s valuations are<br />

undemanding, but <strong>the</strong>re is no near term share price catalyst. The economic<br />

turmoil is likely to last ano<strong>the</strong>r 2-3 quarters, which means earnings risk will<br />

continue to drag down investors’ sentiment and delay a market upturn until<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is sign of an economic recovery, possibly in 2H09.<br />

The concerns could also cap upside potential for equities share price for<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r two quarters. Hence, we prefer stocks with limited downside risks<br />

such as MCOT, for its: (i) recurring income, (ii) higher bargaining power<br />

against content providers, and (iii) strong balance sheet. Compared to BEC,<br />

MCOT has lower downside risk because of its low earnings base in 2008, and<br />

higher dividend yield (FY09:11.2% for MCOT vs. 7.2% for BEC).<br />

Property Development<br />

Neutral<br />

(Upgrade from Underweight)<br />

Political uncertainty, weakening consumer confidence, and slowing economic<br />

growth will have a negative impact on overall property demand. Presales<br />

have slowed sharply, while cancellation rates are also rising as homebuyers<br />

re-assess <strong>the</strong>ir ability to repay mortgages, which are long-term commitments.<br />

In addition, banks are more stringent in extending credit, which has resulted<br />

in higher loan reject rates.<br />

None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> good news is <strong>the</strong> stimulus measures by <strong>the</strong> government to<br />

boost demand, as well as <strong>the</strong> sharp drop in local interest rates. Both should<br />

help lessen <strong>the</strong> impact of weak demand. In addition, most bad news has<br />

been priced in, reflected in <strong>the</strong> sharp 59% drop in <strong>the</strong> Property Sector Index<br />

in <strong>the</strong> last twelve months.<br />

Our top picks are Central Pattana (CPN) and CPN Retail Growth Property<br />

Fund (CPNRF) for <strong>the</strong>ir strong recurring incomes. For residential properties,<br />

our top picks are Preuksa Real Estate (PS), Asian Property (AP), and Supalai<br />

(SPALI), which have large backlog on hand (which means clearer earnings<br />

visibility) and are now trading at deep discounts to <strong>the</strong>ir RNAVs.<br />

CPN, CPNRF, AP, PS, SPALI<br />

Page 112


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

This page has been left blank intentionally<br />

Page 113


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Advanced Info Service<br />

Bloomberg: ADVANC TB | Reuters: ADVA.BK<br />

BUY Bt84.50 SET : 427.72<br />

Price Target : 12-Month Bt 93.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Tariff rate hike and bid for 3G license on 2.1GHz<br />

Analyst<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai +66 0 26577836<br />

Chirasitv@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

116<br />

106<br />

96<br />

86<br />

76<br />

66<br />

56<br />

Bt<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Advance Info Service ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 108,454 110,792 110,638 112,979<br />

EBITDA 44,172 46,912 46,702 48,690<br />

Pre-tax Profit 23,860 26,735 25,336 26,747<br />

Net Profit 16,290 16,409 17,809 18,802<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 16,347 18,820 17,809 18,802<br />

EPS (Bt) 5.51 5.54 6.01 6.35<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) 5.53 6.35 6.01 6.35<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 0.7 15.0 (5.4) 5.6<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.3<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 6.30 6.30 6.30 6.35<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 25.31 24.62 24.19 24.21<br />

PE (X) 15.3 15.3 14.1 13.3<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 15.3 13.3 14.1 13.3<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 6.9 8.4 6.5 6.2<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 6.2 5.8 5.6 5.2<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5<br />

P/Book Value (X) 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 28.5 27.6 16.1 0.0<br />

ROAE (%) 21.5 22.2 24.6 26.2<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 5.9 6.2<br />

Sector: Telecom<br />

Principal Business: ADVANC is <strong>the</strong> largest cellular operator in<br />

Thailand with 45% market share. Its 51%-held subsidiary, ADC, is a<br />

leading provider of data in <strong>the</strong> country.<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

Defensive, with guaranteed<br />

yields<br />

Advanced Info Service (ADVANC TB) should be less<br />

affected by <strong>the</strong> slowing economy as telecom services<br />

have low elasticity of demand, and it has quality<br />

subscribers. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, its minimum Bt6.3 DPS for each of<br />

FY09F and FY10F translates into compelling guaranteed<br />

7.5% dividend yield for those years. The award of 3G<br />

licenses, expected in 4Q09, should be a share price<br />

catalyst in <strong>the</strong> medium term. Reiterate BUY with a DCFbased<br />

target price of Bt93.<br />

Signs of easing price cuts. DTAC and TRUE’s<br />

management have said <strong>the</strong>y would try to avoid a pricing<br />

strategy as <strong>the</strong> market is close to saturation. Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

price cuts during <strong>the</strong> economic turmoil could worsen<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir bottomlines. In our view, Hutch’s entry into <strong>the</strong> IC<br />

scheme, expected by mid-2009, should also ease price<br />

competition as <strong>the</strong> termination rate would be <strong>the</strong> floor<br />

for off-net tariff rate.<br />

Market in favour of defensive counters. The<br />

economic downturn is expected to stretch over <strong>the</strong> next<br />

2-3 quarters, which means <strong>the</strong> market might continue<br />

to favour defensive plays like ADVANC, which has<br />

recurring income and less volatile core profit.<br />

Maintain BUY. ADVANC has a policy to pay 100% of<br />

its earnings as dividends or maintain absolute DPS at<br />

Bt6.30, whichever is higher. The minimum Bt6.30 DPS<br />

for FY09F and FY10F implies guaranteed 7.5% dividend<br />

yield for those years. Reiterate BUY with a revised DCFbased<br />

target price of Bt93.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 2,962<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 250,268 / 7,260<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Shin Corporation (%) 42.7<br />

Singtel Strategic Investment (%) 19.2<br />

HSBC (SINGAPORE) NOMINEES PTE LTD (%) 4.0<br />

Free Float (%) 36.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 5,497<br />

Page 114<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SCG / sa: CS


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Advanced Info Service<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 108,454 110,792 110,638 112,979 Fixed assets 87,088 81,189 72,708 62,527<br />

EBITDA 44,172 46,912 46,702 48,690 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 21,268 19,934 19,258 18,594<br />

Depr/Amort (19,252) (19,378) (20,901) (22,110) Cash/ST Investments 8,440 16,527 3,400 1,940<br />

Opg Profit 24,920 27,534 25,801 26,580 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 12,146 10,431 10,417 10,637<br />

Asso & O<strong>the</strong>r Inc 286 422 420 429 Total Assets 128,942 128,081 105,782 93,698<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,345) (1,221) (886) (262) ST Debt 5,037 7,038 5,000 2,000<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 23,860 26,735 25,336 26,747 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liabilities 23,120 17,822 18,570 19,353<br />

Tax (7,562) (7,860) (7,474) (7,890) LT Debt 25,324 29,786 10,011 11<br />

Minority Interest 48 (55) (52) (55) Minority Interests 576 513 565 620<br />

Extra & Forex (56) (2,411) - - Shareholders' equity 74,884 72,923 71,636 71,713<br />

Net Profit 16,290 16,409 17,809 18,802 Total Capital 128,942 128,081 105,782 93,698<br />

Sales Growth (%) 18.6 2.2 (0.1) 2.1 Share Capital (m) 2,958 2,962 2,962 2,962<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 0.2 0.7 8.5 5.6 Net cash/(debt) (21,526) (20,285) (11,600) (60)<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 40.7 42.3 42.2 43.1 Working capital 7,742 4,532 5,151 5,564<br />

Tax Rate (%) 31.7 29.4 29.5 29.5 Gearing (%) 28.5 27.6 16.1 0.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

EBITDA 44,172 46,912 46,702 48,690 ROE (%) 21.5 22.2 24.6 26.2<br />

Change in W/C (3,578) (3,930) (147) (385) ROA (%) 12.4 12.8 15.2 18.9<br />

Taxes paid (3,620) (12,577) (7,427) (7,637) Net Margin (%) 15.0 14.8 16.1 16.6<br />

i) Operating FCF 36,974 30,405 39,128 40,669 Div. Coverage (x) 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0<br />

Net interest payment (743) (683) (558) (122) Interst Coverage (x) 14.9 17.4 25.5 67.5<br />

ii) Net FCF 36,231 29,722 38,570 40,546 Asset Turnover (x) 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2<br />

Investing cashflow (19,169) (9,932) (10,788) (10,282) Asset/Debt (x) 4.3 3.5 7.1 46.8<br />

iii) Residual cashflow 17,062 19,790 27,782 30,264 Gearing (%) 39.7 50.1 20.8 2.8<br />

Cashflow fr equity (18,437) (18,549) (19,097) (18,724) Net Gearing (%) 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0<br />

Change in net cash (1,375) 1,241 8,685 11,540 Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.0<br />

Ending net cash (21,526) (20,285) (11,600) (60) Debt/ Market Cap (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0<br />

Gross CF/Shr (Bt) 11.9 11.9 12.9 13.7 Capex/Debt (x) 0.6 0.3 0.8 5.8<br />

CF Opera/Shr (Bt) 11.5 12.0 13.5 14.0 Capex/Sales (x) 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

Net FCF/Shr (Bt) 12.2 10.0 13.0 13.7 EV (Btbn) 272 271 262 251<br />

CF Int. Cover (x) 21.5 18.7 37.8 101 EV/EBITDA (x) 6.2 5.8 5.6 5.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Revenue Breakdown (Btm)<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008 FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 28,648 28,345 27,528 26,270 -Post-paid Service 20,733 19,643 19,361 19,443<br />

EBITDA 12,382 12,323 11,702 10,505 -Prepaid Service 50,594 55,317 55,019 56,543<br />

Depr/Amort (4,721) (4,999) (4,978) (4,680) -IR 3,702 3,702 3,591 3,878<br />

Opg Profit 7,661 7,323 6,725 5,825 -Interconnection 16,530 16,213 16,604 16,937<br />

Asso & O<strong>the</strong>r Inc 192 205 184 (158) -O<strong>the</strong>rs 3,251 4,712 5,419 5,853<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (374) (394) (417) (36) -Handset Sales 13,644 11,206 10,645 10,326<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 7,478 7,134 6,491 5,631 Total Revenues 108,454 110,792 110,638 112,979<br />

Tax (2,199) (2,035) (1,942) (1,683) Regulatory (19,691) (20,021) (19,730) (20,086)<br />

Minority Interest (21) (25) 6 (15) Amortization (16,686) (17,898) (19,338) (20,470)<br />

Extra & Forex (134) 1,259 (23) (3,513) Base Station (2,312) (2,513) (2,550) (2,515)<br />

Net Profit 5,124 6,333 4,533 420 Maintenance (1,872) (1,825) (1,850) (1,796)<br />

Sales Growth (%) 21.9 25.0 22.9 (34.1) Interconnection (14,054) (15,476) (16,011) (16,491)<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 28.6 72.9 29.1 (91.8) O<strong>the</strong>rs (3,517) (3,773) (3,750) (3,593)<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 43.2 43.5 42.5 40.0 Handset cost (12,624) (10,534) (9,992) (9,472)<br />

Tax Rate (%) 29.4 28.5 29.9 29.9 Total COGS (70,757) (72,039) (73,220) (74,423)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 115


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Banpu<br />

Bloomberg: BANPU TB | Reuters: BANP.BK<br />

BUY Bt210.00 SET : 427.72<br />

Price Target : 12-month Bt 264.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: robust earnings growth, asset acquisitions<br />

Analyst<br />

Vichitr Kuladejkhuna CFA +66 0 26577826<br />

vichitrk@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

561<br />

511<br />

461<br />

411<br />

361<br />

311<br />

261<br />

211<br />

161<br />

111<br />

Bt<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Banpu ( LHS) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 32,442 50,530 62,699 61,857<br />

EBITDA 9,289 16,988 24,810 20,677<br />

Pre-tax Profit 8,415 14,329 20,845 16,657<br />

Net Profit 6,654 9,228 12,587 10,488<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 5,036 9,230 12,587 10,488<br />

EPS (Bt) 24.5 34.0 46.3 38.6<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) 18.5 34.0 46.3 38.6<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 86 83 36 (17)<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) 24.5 34.0 46.3 38.6<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 8.5 12.0 16.0 16.0<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 126.3 149.0 185.5 208.1<br />

PE (X) 8.6 6.2 4.5 5.4<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 11.3 6.2 4.5 5.4<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 15.8 9.4 4.9 5.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 7.2 4.6 3.1 3.5<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 4.0 5.7 7.6 7.6<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.0<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1<br />

ROAE (%) 23.7 24.7 27.7 19.6<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 40.0 37.2<br />

ICB Industry : Basic Materials<br />

ICB Sector: Mining<br />

Principal Business: Investment in coal and power businesses in<br />

Thailand, Indonesia, and China.<br />

317<br />

267<br />

217<br />

167<br />

117<br />

67<br />

Solid growth<br />

BANPU is among a few companies that are expected to<br />

continue to deliver robust 36% earnings growth in<br />

2009 amid <strong>the</strong> global economic slump. The earnings<br />

drivers will be (i) higher coal sales volume, (ii) sustained<br />

ASP and margins, (iii) improved earnings from China<br />

ventures (full year consolidation of AACI and improved<br />

earnings from China power business), and (iv) lower<br />

expenses (hedging loss and high tax expense in 2008).<br />

Downside risks should be mitigated by <strong>the</strong> early lock-in<br />

of coal contracts and coal hedging contracts. Maintain<br />

BUY with sum-of-parts target price of Bt264.<br />

Mitigating risks. Despite falling spot coal price, we<br />

believe our assumed US$78 ASP for 2009 is achievable.<br />

57% of its Indonesian coal sales target for 2009 has<br />

been locked in at US$79/tonne. Downside risks are<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r mitigated by coal hedging contracts, which<br />

currently account for c. 15% of sales target at an<br />

estimated US$90/tonne.<br />

Short term sentiment may be negative, as spot coal<br />

price continued to slide, hitting US$61.5/tonne on 19<br />

Mar09. However, this could be an opportunity to<br />

accumulate <strong>the</strong> stock, given BANPU’s sound<br />

fundamentals and since coal price is near bottom. At<br />

worst, we still expect flat or moderate earnings growth<br />

in 2009. The power business should continue to<br />

generate stable cashflow.<br />

Bright prospects. BANPU’s coal reserves were raised<br />

by 59% in 2008 following <strong>the</strong> acquisition of AACI and<br />

reserves revaluation, which extended its mine life to c.15<br />

years. We also expect BANPU to seize attractive<br />

acquisition opportunities amid <strong>the</strong> economic turmoil.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 272<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 57,067 / 1,656<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Thai NVDR (%) 9.1<br />

State Street Bank And Trust Company, For London (%) 6.3<br />

Littledown Nominees Limited9 (%) 4.9<br />

Free Float (%) 91.9<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 2,597<br />

Page 116<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SCG / sa: CS


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Banpu<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 32,442 50,530 62,699 61,857 Net Fixed Assets 14,719 17,579 22,637 25,617<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (20,964) (28,110) (34,433) (37,991) Invts in Associates & JVs 11,303 26,373 26,373 26,373<br />

Gross Profit 11,478 22,419 28,265 23,866 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 16,018 18,037 18,107 18,038<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (8,390) (11,729) (9,771) (9,164) Cash & ST Invts 13,304 12,850 12,877 8,790<br />

Operating Profit 3,088 10,691 18,494 14,702 Inventory 1,851 1,651 2,066 2,279<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc (238) (960) (49) (44) Debtors 3,665 6,350 6,997 6,903<br />

Associates & JV Inc 4,504 4,946 3,425 2,819 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 4,192 6,521 4,066 4,120<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,037) (836) (1,514) (1,581) Total Assets 65,051 89,361 93,123 92,121<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 1,619 (2) 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 8,415 14,329 20,845 16,657 ST Debt 4,086 11,242 10,153 8,634<br />

Tax (1,492) (3,768) (5,366) (4,138) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 7,702 13,240 10,561 10,770<br />

Minority Interest (269) (1,333) (2,892) (2,031) LT Debt 14,435 17,832 13,713 5,850<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 330 1,513 359 359<br />

Net Profit 6,654 9,228 12,587 10,488 Shareholder’s Equity 34,309 40,487 50,398 56,538<br />

Net Profit before Except. 5,036 9,230 12,587 10,488 Minority Interests 4,188 5,047 7,939 9,970<br />

EBITDA 9,289 16,988 24,810 20,677 Total Cap. & Liab. 65,051 89,361 93,123 92,121<br />

Sales Gth (%) (2.8) 55.8 24.1 (1.3) Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 2,005 1,280 2,569 2,532<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 12.3 82.9 46.0 (16.7) Net Cash/(Debt) (5,217) (16,224) (10,990) (5,694)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (31.5) 246.2 73.0 (20.5)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 84.3 38.7 36.4 (16.7)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 17.7 26.3 25.7 24.8<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 8,415 14,329 20,845 16,657 Gross Margins (%) 35.4 44.4 45.1 38.6<br />

Dep. & Amort. 1,456 1,821 2,451 2,439 Opg Profit Margin (%) 9.5 21.2 29.5 23.8<br />

Tax Paid (2,166) (1,552) (5,366) (4,138) Net Profit Margin (%) 20.5 18.3 20.1 17.0<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (4,504) (4,946) (3,425) (2,819) ROAE (%) 23.7 24.7 27.7 19.6<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 1,192 (495) (1,289) 37 ROA (%) 11.6 12.0 13.8 11.3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (1,320) (1,089) 1,882 92 ROCE (%) 5.1 11.8 17.3 13.5<br />

Net Operating CF 1,313 7,939 15,098 12,268 Div Payout Ratio (%) 34.7 35.3 34.5 41.5<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (3,313) (4,825) (7,509) (5,420) Net Interest Cover (x) 3.0 12.8 12.2 9.3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 583 97 (685) (564) Asset Turnover (x) 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (1,737) (14,024) (685) (564) Debtors Turn (avg days) 43.2 36.2 38.9 41.0<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 1,702 2,561 3,615 3,341 Creditors Turn (avg days) 12.2 17.1 20.3 21.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 296 1,251 615 632 Inventory Turn (avg days) 32.7 24.3 21.2 22.3<br />

Net Investing CF (2,469) (14,940) (4,648) (2,574) Current Ratio (x) 2.0 1.1 1.3 1.1<br />

Div Paid (2,154) (3,136) (3,261) (4,348) Quick Ratio (x) 1.4 0.8 1.0 0.8<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (393) 10,318 (7,160) (9,434) Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 17.9 16.6 31.5 37.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 12,211 (636) 0 0 Z-Score (X) 3.1 2.9 3.5 3.9<br />

Net Financing CF 9,664 6,547 (10,421) (13,782) N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Bt) (19.2) (59.7) (40.4) (21.0)<br />

Net Cashflow 8,508 (455) 28 (4,088) Opg CFPS (Bt) 0.4 31.0 60.3 45.0<br />

Free CFPS (Bt) (7.4) 11.5 27.9 25.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008 FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 8,637 11,068 14,352 16,473 Revenues (Bt m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (5,789) (6,488) (8,079) (7,754) Coal 28,429 45,976 58,699 57,857<br />

Gross Profit 2,848 4,580 6,273 8,719 Power 3,865 4,460 4,000 4,000<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (1,871) (2,444) (3,212) (4,202) O<strong>the</strong>rs 148 94 0 0<br />

Operating Profit 977 2,135 3,061 4,517 Total 32,442 50,530 62,699 61,857<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 117 209 (175) (1,111) Gross profit (Bt m)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1,282 866 1,707 1,091 Coal 10,467 21,982 27,345 22,786<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (103) (137) (320) (276) Power 956 397 920 1,080<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 253 0 0 (255) O<strong>the</strong>rs 55 40 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,526 3,323 4,513 3,967 Total 11,478 22,419 28,265 23,866<br />

Tax (326) (642) (920) (1,880) Gross profit Margins (%)<br />

Minority Interest (126) (382) (481) (343) Coal 36.8 47.8 46.6 39.4<br />

Net Profit 2,074 2,299 3,111 1,744 Power 24.7 8.9 23.0 27.0<br />

Net profit bef Except. 1,821 2,299 3,111 1,999 O<strong>the</strong>rs 37.1 43.1 0 0<br />

EBITDA 5,401 3,998 5,380 4,978 Total 35.4 44.4 45.1 38.6<br />

Sales Gth (%) (6.0) 28.1 29.7 14.8<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 277.9 (26.0) 34.6 (7.5)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 68.5 118.6 43.4 47.6<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 4.6 10.8 35.3 (44.0)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 33.0 41.4 43.7 52.9<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 11.3 19.3 21.3 27.4<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 24.0 20.8 21.7 10.6<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 117


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Bangkok Bank<br />

Bloomberg: BBL TB | Reuters: BBL.BK<br />

BUY Bt76.50 SET : 427.72<br />

Price Target : 12-Month Bt 88.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: (i) Strong franchise, (ii) good relationship with<br />

corporate clients, and (iii) highest NPL coverage ratio at 109% is<br />

sufficient to cover rising NPLs.<br />

Analyst<br />

Sugittra Kongkhajornkidsuk +662 657 7825<br />

sugittrak@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

153<br />

133<br />

113<br />

93<br />

73<br />

53<br />

Bt<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Bangkok Bank ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 33,443 38,959 34,312 36,383<br />

Net Profit 19,218 20,243 17,795 18,335<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 19,218 20,243 17,795 18,335<br />

EPS (Bt) 10.1 10.6 9.3 9.6<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) 10.1 10.6 9.3 9.6<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 8 5 (12) 3<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) 10.1 10.6 9.3 9.6<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 7.6 7.2 8.2 8.0<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5<br />

Div Yield (%) 3.9 3.9 3.3 3.3<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 12.2 11.9 9.9 9.5<br />

ROAE (%) 12.2 11.9 9.9 9.5<br />

ROA (%) 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 87 92 98 105<br />

RNAV per shr (Bt) N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

P/Book Value (x) 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 10.0 10.7<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Banking and financial services.<br />

203<br />

183<br />

163<br />

143<br />

123<br />

103<br />

83<br />

Strong balance sheet<br />

Bangkok Bank (BBL) is <strong>the</strong> largest bank in Thailand. It<br />

has a strong franchise network and good relationships<br />

with corporates and large & medium size SME clients.<br />

We forecast FY09F loan growth at minus 1.0% (2008:<br />

+13.4%) vs BBL’s internal target of 2-4%. Our<br />

assumption is premised on lower loan demand as a<br />

result of <strong>the</strong> economic slowdown. But BBL has a strong<br />

capital base to support potentially weaker asset quality<br />

and high liquidity to compete for deposits. Maintain<br />

BUY and Bt88.0 target price.<br />

Expect loans to contract in 2009. BBL aims to rein in<br />

loan growth and focus more on asset quality amidst a<br />

weaker domestic economy. Hence, we expect loans to<br />

contract 1.0% in FY09F vs its internal 2-4% target,<br />

premised on slower demand for corporate and SME loans<br />

and higher repayment of working capital loans in 2009.<br />

We also expect FY09F net profit to contract 12.0% after<br />

imputing (i) higher LLP of 0.75% of total loans, and (ii) 23<br />

bps narrower NIM.<br />

Highest NPL cover. We are concerned about its foreign<br />

loans (16% of total loans) despite its still low NPL ratio;<br />

that could rise due to <strong>the</strong> global financial turmoil. BBL<br />

faces higher risk of asset deterioration in 2009, although<br />

it has <strong>the</strong> highest NPL coverage ratio of 109% at YE08<br />

and Bt26bn excess loan loss reserve requirement. We<br />

expect BBL to book Bt8.8bn LLP for FY09F, implying<br />

0.75% of total loans. The bank’s CAR was 13.8%, with<br />

Tier-1 capital at 11.2% at YE08 (complied with Basel II).<br />

The bank believes that its current capital is sufficient for<br />

business growth and to cover rising NPLs.<br />

Maintain BUY, Bt88.0 target price. We value BBL at<br />

0.9x 2009 P/BV. BBL now offers 15% upside to our<br />

Bt88.0 target price and 3.3% dividend yield for FY09F.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,909<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 146,026 / 4,236<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

SET (%) 12.0<br />

Thai NVDR (%) 10.0<br />

HSBC (Singapore) Nominees Pte Ltd (%) 2.9<br />

Free Float (%) 97.2<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 3,685<br />

Page 118<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SCG / sa: CS


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Bangkok Bank<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Net Interest Income 47,013 52,927 50,464 52,557 Cash/Bank Balance 35,715 41,506 33,387 34,009<br />

Non-Interest Income 22,462 24,457 25,309 27,214 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 10,200 0 0 0<br />

Operating Income 69,475 77,384 75,773 79,771 Inter Bank Assets 177,365 138,897 183,628 191,298<br />

Operating Expenses (36,033) (38,425) (41,461) (43,388) Total Net Loans & Advs. 977,698 1,124,272 1,096,638 1,110,206<br />

Pre-provision Profit 33,443 38,959 34,312 36,383 Investment 311,680 283,441 260,417 269,411<br />

Provisions (5,579) (6,578) (8,800) (10,400) Associates 321 401 6,677 6,908<br />

Associates 93 92 115 130 Fixed Assets 30,189 30,823 30,823 30,823<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 Goodwill 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 28,558 29,490 25,827 26,513 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 49,768 57,772 57,772 57,772<br />

Taxation (9,220) (9,165) (7,932) (8,098) Total Assets 1,592,936 1,677,111 1,669,342 1,700,426<br />

Minority Interests (120) (81) (100) (80) Customer Deposits 1,277,371 1,322,287 1,335,487 1,362,187<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 64,156 55,899 51,888 52,501<br />

Net Profit 19,218 20,243 17,795 18,335 Debts/Borrowings 42,715 69,127 65,972 54,001<br />

Net Profit bef Except 19,218 20,243 17,795 18,335 O<strong>the</strong>rs 42,056 54,194 29,169 31,345<br />

Minorities 657 630 650 650<br />

Shareholders' Funds 165,979 174,973 186,175 199,740<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 1,592,936 1,677,111 1,669,342 1,700,426<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 5.26 5.00 4.68 4.60 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 81.8 89.6 87.8 87.8<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.46 1.95 1.83 1.67 Net Loans / Total Assets 61.4 67.0 65.7 65.3<br />

Spread 2.80 3.05 2.84 2.93 Investment / Total Assets 19.6 16.9 15.6 15.8<br />

Net Interest Margin 3.08 3.28 3.06 3.14 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 94.2 94.9 95.2 95.3<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 51.4 51.6 54.5 54.0 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7<br />

Employees ( Year End) 20,074 N/A N/A N/A Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 32.3 31.1 30.7 30.5 NPL / Total Gross Loans 7.9 4.6 5.3 5.1<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 5.2 3.3 3.7 3.6<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 67.7 68.4 66.6 65.9 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 32.3 31.6 33.4 34.1 Total CAR 15.8 13.8 15.6 16.4<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 24.0 23.7 26.2 26.8 Tier-1 CAR 12.0 11.2 13.0 13.8<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 8.3 7.9 7.2 7.3 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 9 15 (2) 1<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 12.2 11.9 9.9 9.5 Customer Deposits 4 4 1 2<br />

ROAE 12.2 11.9 9.9 9.5<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1<br />

ROA 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Btm)<br />

P/BV<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008<br />

Net Interest Income 12,783 13,131 13,511 13,501<br />

Non-Interest Income 6,513 6,045 6,028 5,923<br />

Operating Income 19,296 19,176 19,539 19,424<br />

Operating Expenses (9,267) (9,769) (9,688) (9,752)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 10,029 9,407 9,851 9,672<br />

Provisions (1,564) (1,587) (1,038) (2,389)<br />

Associates 40 19 22 11<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 8,327 7,747 6,316 7,099<br />

Taxation (2,669) (2,699) (1,979) (1,818)<br />

Minority Interests (32) (15) (21) (14)<br />

Net Profit 5,626 5,033 4,316 5,268<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 119


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Indonesia<br />

Election season<br />

JCI : 1,341.6<br />

JCI 3 / 12 mths Target : 1,448/1,583<br />

Expected Return : 8% / 18%<br />

1Q09 was a quiet quarter with trading volume and value falling<br />

50.1% y-oy and 75.4% y-oy, respectively, implying low investor risk<br />

appetite. We believe <strong>the</strong> high risk aversion is due to <strong>the</strong> impact of<br />

global economic uncertainties on Indonesia, as well as domestic<br />

political tension due to <strong>the</strong> coming elections. Political developments<br />

could be <strong>the</strong> main focus for <strong>the</strong> market going forward. The market<br />

could move sideways in 2Q09 and early 3Q09 until uncertainties<br />

caused by <strong>the</strong> upcoming presidential election are cleared. Given<br />

<strong>the</strong>se short-term uncertainties, we stick to our previous quarter’s<br />

strategy, preferring companies with strong balance sheet and good<br />

earnings visibility.<br />

Indonesia will hold parliamentary election on 9 April and presidential election on<br />

8 July 2009. Political tension is heating up with parties on <strong>the</strong> move to build and<br />

bargain for a coalition. In <strong>the</strong> parliamentary election, 38 parties will be<br />

competing at national level. A recent poll shows <strong>the</strong> dominant parties are Partai<br />

Demokrat, PDIP and Golkar. However, a black horse could emerge. Some<br />

candidates had been announced for <strong>the</strong> presidential election, but a coalition is<br />

possible. Up to now, polls still tip Yudhoyono as <strong>the</strong> most popular candidate for<br />

president. Only time will tell.<br />

The <strong>DBS</strong> economic team estimates GDP growth will slow down in 2009. It<br />

believes that fiscal and monetary policies will help to ease <strong>the</strong> impact of global<br />

recession. The government’s Rp73.3tn stimulus package as well as fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

interest rate cuts should stimulate <strong>the</strong> economy. The team estimates private<br />

consumption will grow 4%, government consumption 11.4%, and gross capital<br />

formation 2.5% in 2009.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> election season, we expect <strong>the</strong> market to move sideways. But <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are risks of earnings downgrade as consensus seems to be still bullish. We prefer<br />

stocks that are resilient to <strong>the</strong> crisis, have strong balance sheets and high<br />

earnings visibility. Our top pick for large cap is PTBA and ITMG for small cap.<br />

Agus Pramono, CFA (6221) 39832668 . agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 120<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: GC / sa: TW


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Close Chg net % Change 52 week<br />

19-Mar -09 -1mth -1mth -3mth -6mth -12mth High Low<br />

JCI 1,341.6 17.9 1.4 (0.5) (29.1) (42.3) 2,511.0 1,111.4<br />

LQ45 262.7 4.8 1.9 (2.3) (32.2) (47.3) 539.3 206.7<br />

Agriculture 999.9 (50.7) (4.8) 10.8 (30.9) (63.7) 3,077.2 615.0<br />

Basic Industries 125.0 (1.3) (1.0) (6.5) (23.9) (31.1) 225.1 99.7<br />

Consumer 342.4 (8.3) (2.4) 4.6 (8.6) (14.4) 422.7 279.5<br />

Finance 160.4 3.1 2.0 (8.3) (24.1) (25.9) 233.9 125.9<br />

Infrastructure 474.6 6.5 1.4 (3.2) (17.0) (38.1) 788.0 370.6<br />

Manufacturing 249.7 10.4 4.3 5.3 (17.6) (26.1) 364.9 189.1<br />

Mining 939.1 (23.9) (2.5) 6.0 (53.7) (64.8) 3,526.5 770.7<br />

Misc. Industry 265.8 48.1 22.1 21.4 (21.8) (33.7) 939.1 164.7<br />

Property 97.5 (0.5) (0.5) (1.4) (31.9) (48.8) 265.8 94.0<br />

Trade & Service 150.5 1.2 0.8 4.6 (44.5) (55.7) 385.7 97.5<br />

Transactions (<strong>DBS</strong>V Universe):<br />

YTD<br />

Vol (bln shrs) 99.7<br />

Val Rptr) 76.3<br />

Source: IDX<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

The JCI was flat in 1Q09 as investors preferred to wait for<br />

positive signals from global financial markets. In IDR terms,<br />

JCI lost 0.5% in 1Q09, better than its regional peers. But it<br />

under-performed regional markets in US$, losing 8.9%.<br />

JCI and regional indices performance<br />

Local Currency (%) 1Q08 4Q08 1Q09<br />

Hang Seng -19.1 -21.7 -13.2<br />

Strait Times Index -15.0 -29.8 -11.7<br />

SET Thailand 0.3 -28.5 -4.3<br />

JCI Jakarta -12.6 -28.7 -0.5<br />

US$ (%)<br />

Hang Seng -18.8 -21.4 -13.2<br />

Strait Times Index -9.9 -31.8 -15.3<br />

SET Thailand 1.5 -27.4 -1.7<br />

JCI Jakarta -10.3 -43.4 -8.9<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong>VI<br />

Indonesia: Domestic and foreign transactions<br />

Rptr Transactions (Rptr) Transactions (bn shares)<br />

Foreign Domestic Total Foreign Domestic Total<br />

1Q08 78.5 239.0 317.4 35.8 160.3 196.0<br />

4Q08 62.1 84.0 146.1 56.5 141.4 197.9<br />

2008 294.7 769.9 1,064.5 164.5 623.3 787.8<br />

1Q09* 20.0 58.0 77.9 13.5 84.3 97.9<br />

1Q09 vs<br />

1Q08 (%) -74.6 -75.7 -75.4 -62.2 -47.4 -50.1<br />

* As of 19Mar09<br />

Source: IDX<br />

Despite controversy behind <strong>the</strong> acquisitions of some<br />

companies, Bumi Resources remained <strong>the</strong> most liquid stock<br />

on <strong>the</strong> JSX, followed by Bakrieland Development. Bapepam<br />

has not decided on Bumi’s proposed acquisition. The Mining<br />

sector was <strong>the</strong> best performer in 1Q09, posting 6.0% return<br />

as mining stocks rebounded from <strong>the</strong>ir lows in 4Q08.<br />

In 1Q09, <strong>the</strong> JSX trading volume fell 50.1% while traded<br />

value slid 75.4% from <strong>the</strong> same period last year. Meanwhile,<br />

participation of foreign investors fell to 13.8% of total<br />

volume from 18.2% in 1Q08.<br />

Page 121


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

LIQUIDITY<br />

Inflation had softened to 0.14% for 2M09 (0.07% deflation<br />

in Jan09 and 0.21% inflation in Feb09), driven by deflation<br />

in transportation and communication. The government had<br />

lowered fuel price by 20% from Rp5,000 to Rp4,000 in<br />

Jan09 after international crude price fell in 4Q08.<br />

Meanwhile, inflationary pressures elsewhere were also<br />

easing. But with <strong>the</strong> weaker rupiah and raw material prices<br />

mostly in US$, prices of discretionary consumer goods have<br />

crept up.<br />

Indonesia: BI rate and deposit rate<br />

14.0%<br />

12.0%<br />

10.0%<br />

ELECTION<br />

Political tension is rising as <strong>the</strong> parliamentary election date<br />

draws near, with parties moving to build and bargain for a<br />

coalition. The parliamentary election is scheduled for 9 April<br />

2009, with 38 parties participating at national level. Based<br />

on a recent poll by polling agencies, Partai Demokrat, PDIP<br />

and Golkar are <strong>the</strong> dominant parties. We do not expect <strong>the</strong><br />

landscape to change significantly, but a black horse could<br />

emerge in <strong>the</strong> election.<br />

The presidential election is scheduled for 8 July 2009, and<br />

newspapers are reporting coalition possibilities between<br />

presidential candidates. Although Vice President Jusuf Kalla<br />

has been nominated by Golkar at its regional office meeting<br />

to run for president, a statement by Golkar’s central<br />

committee implies that this could be a bargaining strategy to<br />

build a coalition with candidates from o<strong>the</strong>r parties. Up to<br />

now, <strong>the</strong> polls still tip Yudhoyono as <strong>the</strong> most popular<br />

candidate for president. Only time will tell.<br />

8.0%<br />

6.0%<br />

Source: BI<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

BI rate<br />

1M Deposit Rate<br />

Bank Indonesia (BI) had cut BI rates by 150bps in 1Q09 due<br />

to two factors: (i) slower inflation, and (ii) to stimulate<br />

economic growth under <strong>the</strong> shadow of <strong>the</strong> global recession.<br />

However, interest rates in <strong>the</strong> financial market were firm as<br />

liquidity in <strong>the</strong> banking and financial system remained tight.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> government is pressuring <strong>the</strong> banking sector<br />

to lower interest rates, <strong>the</strong> government itself has to issue<br />

US$ and rupiah bonds at high rates. It issued 5 and 10-year<br />

US$ bonds at 10.5% and 11.75%, respectively, and 3-year<br />

IDR sukuk bonds at 12%.<br />

Indonesia: Top 5 Election Poll Results<br />

Political Parties surveys<br />

Presidential surveys<br />

Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI)<br />

Survey period: 10-22 Dec08 Survey period: Dec08<br />

% %<br />

Demokrat 23.0 Susilo Bambang Y 43.0<br />

PDIP 17.1 Megawati 19.0<br />

Golkar 13.3 Prabowo Subianto 5.0<br />

PKB 4.8 Sri Sultan HB X 5.0<br />

PKS 4.0 Wiranto 3.0<br />

Indo Barometer<br />

Survey period: 9 Jul08<br />

Survey period: Jun08<br />

PDIP 23.8 Megawati 26.1<br />

Golkar 12.0 Susilo Bambang Y 19.1<br />

Demokrat 9.6 Wiranto 7.8<br />

PKS 7.4 A. Wahid 5.3<br />

PKB 7.4 Sri Sultan HB X 4.8<br />

Source: Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI), Indo Barometer<br />

Page 122


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

GROWTH<br />

Bank Indonesia used to be more optimistic than private<br />

sector economists, but it is now more bearish on <strong>the</strong><br />

economy. BI Governor Budiono said GDP growth could<br />

drop to 4% this year with high downside risk. BI had also<br />

lowered its loan growth estimate to 15% from 18-20%<br />

previously, after it received business plans from banks.<br />

The <strong>DBS</strong> economics team is maintaining its GDP growth<br />

estimate at 4.3% for FY09, in line with market expectation<br />

on <strong>the</strong> back of Indonesia’s low export dependency. Private<br />

consumption spending accounts for 61% of GDP while netexports<br />

account for only 1%.<br />

Indonesia: Export slow in line with commodity cycle<br />

% YoY % YoY<br />

50<br />

25<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Indonesia: GDP components (2008)<br />

Less Import<br />

Goods and<br />

services, 29%<br />

Exports of<br />

Goods &<br />

Services, 30%<br />

Chg in Stock,<br />

0% General Govt<br />

Gross Domestic<br />

Expenditures,<br />

Fixed Cap<br />

8%<br />

Formation, 28%<br />

Source: BPS<br />

Indonesia: Budget deficit since 1999<br />

Surp/def % of GDP<br />

0.0<br />

Private<br />

Consumption<br />

Expenditures,<br />

61%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-1.0<br />

-20<br />

Rtrs/Jeff CRB comm px index<br />

-30<br />

GDP gds exports (RHS)<br />

Latest: 4Q08<br />

-40<br />

Mar-01 Mar-03 Mar-05 Mar-07<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>, CEIC<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> economics team believes that <strong>the</strong> fiscal and monetary<br />

policies will help to ease <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> global recession.<br />

Specifically, (i) an expansive budget with a deficit of 2.5%<br />

including <strong>the</strong> Rp73.3tr stimulus package, and (ii) <strong>the</strong> BI<br />

interest rate policy - <strong>the</strong> rate had been cut to 7.75% in<br />

Mar09 and is expected to be cut by ano<strong>the</strong>r 100bps to<br />

6.75%. As such, private consumption is estimated to grow<br />

4%, government consumption 11.4%, and gross capital<br />

formation up 2.5% in FY09.<br />

-2.0<br />

-3.0<br />

-4.0<br />

-2.8<br />

-2.5<br />

Govt forecast -2.5<br />

1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>, CEIC<br />

There was some optimism after <strong>the</strong> release of better than<br />

expected Feb09 car and motor cycle sales data – sales had<br />

risen 9.1% and 12.7% m-o-m, respectively. But checks with<br />

some bankers indicate that most are still conservative,<br />

estimating flat loan growth under a best-case scenario. We<br />

estimate loans will grow 10% this year on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

continuing growth in <strong>the</strong> economy, albeit at a slower pace,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> government stimulus package.<br />

Page 123


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Indonesia: 4W, 2W and cement sales<br />

6.0%<br />

higher risk aversion is driven by: (i) global economic<br />

uncertainties, (ii) its impact on Indonesia’s economy, and (iii)<br />

political tension due to <strong>the</strong> coming election. We believe<br />

political tension is <strong>the</strong> most dominant factor currently.<br />

3.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> uncertainties, <strong>the</strong> JCI is also facing risks of earnings<br />

downgrades as <strong>the</strong> market seems to be too bullish on<br />

economic fundamentals. We had downgraded our FY09F<br />

earnings by 1.6% in 1Q09, but we think <strong>the</strong>re is risk of fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

downgrades.<br />

-3.0%<br />

Jan-08 Mar-08 May-08 Jul-08 Sep-08 Nov-08 Jan-09<br />

Source: Gaikindo, ASI<br />

2W 4W Ce me nt<br />

The current global economic turbulence has raised<br />

uncertainties about <strong>the</strong> economic and business environment.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, we see a global economic recovery on <strong>the</strong> way,<br />

and with it recovery in Asia. But determining <strong>the</strong> timing of <strong>the</strong><br />

recovery is challenging. As such, we remain cautiously<br />

optimistic that we are currently facing a left fat tail.<br />

VALUATION AND STRATEGY<br />

Valuation of <strong>the</strong> JCI has fallen from 15.9x PER in 1Q08 to 9.7x<br />

in 1Q09. At current level, <strong>the</strong> JCI is trading at a discount to<br />

regional markets except Thailand. We believe rising risk<br />

aversion had caused a fur<strong>the</strong>r de-rating. In our opinion, <strong>the</strong><br />

We continue to prefer stocks that are resilient to <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

crisis from <strong>the</strong> business and financial perspectives. Companies<br />

with strong balance sheets and competitive advantages will<br />

benefit when <strong>the</strong> economy recovers. Among <strong>the</strong> sectors under<br />

our coverage, coal will be less affected by cyclicality because of<br />

its importance in generating electricity and as fuel for<br />

industries. At <strong>the</strong> same time, coal’s selling price will be<br />

adjusted up in 2009 as <strong>the</strong> majority price negotiations took<br />

place at <strong>the</strong> end of 2008 when coal price was still high.<br />

We feature only two stocks in our 2Q09 quarterly because risk<br />

aversion should remain high during <strong>the</strong> election season. PTBA<br />

is our top pick in <strong>the</strong> large cap category and ITMG in <strong>the</strong><br />

small/medium cap category. Our selection is premised on <strong>the</strong><br />

companies’ strong balance sheets and high earnings visibility.<br />

Both companies have locked in more than 50% of <strong>the</strong>ir 2009<br />

sales volume at higher prices.<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

EPS Growth (%) CAGR (%) PATMI (Rpbn) PER (x)<br />

07A 08F 09F 07-09 07A 08F 09F 07A 08F 09F<br />

Conglomerate/Automotive 31.3 (31.1) 1.2 (16.5) 8,557 5,896 5,969 6.8 9.9 9.7<br />

Infrastructure 24.9 (22.9) 9.4 15.4 3,604 2,779 3,039 10.8 9.2 8.0<br />

Consumer 23.8 (1.5) 14.5 15.5 2,270 2,235 2,559 5.4 5.3 4.5<br />

Banks 14.7 9.5 14.2 11.8 19,594 21,463 24,511 10.9 9.9 8.6<br />

Plantation 40.2 (30.8) (7.2) (19.9) 3,559 2,463 2,284 7.0 10.2 11.9<br />

Basic Materials (54.8) (46.1) (18.5) (33.7) 9,482 5,110 4,165 3.9 7.2 9.5<br />

Oil, Gas & Energy 43.6 11.3 (6.2) 2.2 20,335 22,638 21,242 14.7 7.7 7.8<br />

Telecommunications (11.0) (10.6) 0.7 (5.1) 13,256 11,849 11,938 14.7 7.7 7.8<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 124


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Indonesia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Conglomerate/<br />

Automotive<br />

Neutral<br />

Cement and Construction<br />

Neutral<br />

Consumer Goods<br />

Neutral<br />

Banking<br />

Neutral<br />

Plantation<br />

Neutral<br />

Basic Materials<br />

Cautious<br />

We maintain our Neutral view on <strong>the</strong> Automotive sector on <strong>the</strong> back<br />

of higher interest rates and weakening purchasing power. We had<br />

lowered our car sales growth forecast to 35% and motorcycle sales<br />

growth to 20%. Despite <strong>the</strong> BI rate being cut from 9.25% in Dec08<br />

to 8.25%, banks and financing companies are still risk averse and<br />

financing for automotives has dried up. Meanwhile, Astra<br />

International (ASII)’s subsidiaries, United Tractors (UNTR) and Astra<br />

Agro Lestari (AALI), should also see slower sales.<br />

Cement sales is expected to drop in 2009 due to two reasons: (i) last<br />

year’s sales were abnormally high, and (ii) <strong>the</strong> economy slowdown<br />

should dampen cement sales. However, we expect sales to recover<br />

next year in anticipation of <strong>the</strong> government’s plan to accelerate<br />

spending on infrastructure. We like Semen Gresik (SMGR) for its<br />

strong balance sheet and its leading position in <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

Our Consumer sector is dominated by Indofood (INDF), for which we<br />

have a Hold call. We expect raw material/commodity prices to<br />

remain firm this year, which means little scope for consumer<br />

companies to significantly reduce prices. And as <strong>the</strong> global recession<br />

drags on, purchasing power, down trading and market share erosion<br />

remain our top concerns. Against this backdrop, <strong>the</strong>re is little<br />

excitement in terms of returns for <strong>the</strong> sector, o<strong>the</strong>r than dividend<br />

yield. We recommend to wait for more attractive entry levels and to<br />

accumulate on sell-downs.<br />

We maintain our Neutral view on <strong>the</strong> Banking sector because <strong>the</strong><br />

sector faces risks of slowing loan growth as well as rising NPL ratio.<br />

A falling BI rate will help <strong>the</strong> sector, but amid <strong>the</strong> global financial<br />

crisis, <strong>the</strong> transmission of monetary policy may take longer. We like<br />

Bank Mandiri (BMRI) for its relatively high CAR, its liquidity, and<br />

attractive valuation.<br />

We recently upgraded <strong>the</strong> Plantation sector to Neutral and raised<br />

FY09-11F CPO price assumptions by 20%, 13% and 8% to US$590,<br />

US$630 and US$690, respectively, due to <strong>the</strong> drought effect.<br />

However, most plantation stocks have priced this in, and we see<br />

downside potential in <strong>the</strong> near term as exports are expected to slow<br />

down. When that happens, we recommend accumulating plantation<br />

counters on dips. Our top Sell call is AALI on valuation concerns.<br />

We remain Cautious on <strong>the</strong> Basic Materials sector, as prices remain<br />

weak and demand for metals has not shown signs of improvement.<br />

The slowdown in <strong>the</strong> global economy has reduced demand for<br />

metal, including nickel and tin; producers of <strong>the</strong>se commodities are<br />

experiencing faster revenue declines than drops in production cost,<br />

which means <strong>the</strong>re will be margin pressure. As such, we expect<br />

metal producers such as Aneka Tambang (ANTM), International<br />

Nickel (INCO) and Timah (TINS) to face earnings pressure going<br />

forward.<br />

-<br />

SMGR<br />

-<br />

BMRI<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Page 125


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Energy<br />

Neutral<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Cautious<br />

We maintain our Neutral stance on <strong>the</strong> Energy sector, on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

weak demand for energy-related commodities. Led by weak oil<br />

price, prices of o<strong>the</strong>r energy commodities such as coal and gas will<br />

also be under pressure. An economy recovery will be <strong>the</strong> key catalyst<br />

for a recovery in energy prices, but currently it seems a recovery is<br />

unlikely in <strong>the</strong> near term.<br />

Despite this, we are still positive on counters with company specific<br />

growth factors, such as Indo Tambangraya (ITMG) and Bukit Asam<br />

(PTBA). Both companies will still experience healthy earnings growth<br />

in FY09F, and have solid balance sheets to support <strong>the</strong>ir long-term<br />

strategies. Thus, <strong>the</strong>y are our top picks for <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

We downgraded <strong>the</strong> Telecommunications sector to Cautious on <strong>the</strong><br />

back of weak economic outlook, and lower revenue growth and<br />

EBITDA margin y-o-y. Also, aggressive capex spending last year could<br />

result in <strong>the</strong> full year impact of depreciation and interest charges this<br />

year. PT Telkom’s (TLKM IJ) revenue is expected to grow c. 5% y-o-y,<br />

less than <strong>the</strong> industry average due to <strong>the</strong> drag effect from its<br />

lethargic fixed line business. However, Indosat (ISAT IJ) is expected to<br />

register c. 8% y-o-y revenue growth, driven by its cellular division.<br />

Following <strong>the</strong> end of a tender offer by Qtel for 24% of ISAT shares,<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter’s share price has fallen by >20%. We reiterate our BUY call<br />

for ISAT with a DCF-based price target of Rp5,000. ISAT’s net<br />

debt/EBITDA remains manageable, at only 1.8x FY09F.<br />

ITMG, PTBA<br />

ISAT<br />

Page 126


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

This page has been left blank intentionally<br />

Page 127


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Tambang Batubara<br />

Bloomberg: PTBA IJ | Reuters: PTBA.JK<br />

BUY Rp6,550 JCI : 1,341.60<br />

Price Target : 12-Month Rp 8,359<br />

Potential Catalyst: Coal price recovery<br />

Analyst<br />

Yusuf Winoto CFA +6221 3983 2668<br />

yusuf.winoto@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

Rp<br />

17,170<br />

15,170<br />

13,170<br />

11,170<br />

9,170<br />

7,170<br />

5,170<br />

3,170<br />

1,170<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Tambang Batubara (LHS) Relative JCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Rp bn) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 4,124 7,216 10,097 8,279<br />

EBITDA 1,053 2,514 3,875 2,278<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,058 2,552 3,741 1,804<br />

Net Profit 760 1,708 2,684 1,345<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 760 1,708 2,684 1,345<br />

EPS (Rp) 330 741 1,165 584<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Rp) 330 741 1,165 584<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 57 125 57 (50)<br />

Diluted EPS (Rp) 330 741 1,165 584<br />

Net DPS (Rp) 105 165 371 582<br />

BV Per Share (Rp) 1,215 1,735 2,529 2,531<br />

PE (X) 19.8 8.8 5.6 11.2<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 19.8 8.8 5.6 11.2<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 18.1 8.5 5.4 9.8<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 12.2 4.8 3.2 6.6<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 1.6 2.5 5.7 8.9<br />

P/Book Value (X) 5.4 3.8 2.6 2.6<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 29.9 50.2 54.6 23.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): (0.3) (0.4)<br />

Consensus EPS (Rp): 1,148 865<br />

ICB Industry : Energy<br />

ICB Sector: Coal<br />

Principal Business: Coal Mining<br />

475<br />

425<br />

375<br />

325<br />

275<br />

225<br />

175<br />

125<br />

75<br />

The heat is still on!<br />

Following robust growth in FY08 that saw revenue<br />

and earnings jump 75% and 135% y-o-y, respectively,<br />

Bukit Asam (PTBA) is on track for ano<strong>the</strong>r record year<br />

in FY09. This would be driven by its ability to secure<br />

42% of FY09 coal volume at higher prices than last<br />

year. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> power plant projects under its<br />

strategic long term plan are progressing well and will<br />

fully utilize its vast coal reserves and resources.<br />

Maintain BUY.<br />

Ending 2008 on a strong note. PTBA reported FY08<br />

net profit of Rp1,707bn (+135% y-o-y) as revenue<br />

soared 75% y-o-y. The key drivers were higher sales<br />

prices (+46% y-o-y) and sales volume (+18% y-o-y). Its<br />

balance sheet was also solid, with net-cash of<br />

Rp3,042bn.<br />

2009 looks even more promising. Having locked in<br />

6.5mn tons (45% of total FY09F sales volume) of coal<br />

for <strong>the</strong> domestic market in FY09 at Rp884k/ton, 74%<br />

higher than FY08’s average domestic price, PTBA<br />

should be able to grow revenue and net profit by<br />

43% and 53%, respectively.<br />

Long term strategy progressing well. PTBA’s long<br />

term plan to boost production and utilize its vast<br />

reserves includes improving and enhancing its railway<br />

transportation capacity and building coal-fired power<br />

plants near its mines. The projects are progressing as<br />

planned, and are expected to commence operations<br />

between 2011 and 2013. PTBA also upgraded its coal<br />

reserves by 200mn tons to 2bn tons after an<br />

independent valuation by IMC Group Consulting Ltd<br />

from <strong>the</strong> UK that complies with US Geological Survey<br />

(USGS) valuation guidelines. The huge reserves will<br />

underpin PTBA’s growth going forward.<br />

Maintain BUY call for PTBA. This is premised on its<br />

strong earnings, stable balance sheet and promising<br />

outlook. Our target price is Rp8,359, based on DCF<br />

methodology with 17.3% WACC.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 2,304<br />

Mkt. Cap (Rpbn/US$m) 15,092 / 1,268<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Govt. of Indonesia (%) 65.0<br />

Free Float (%) 35.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 4,988<br />

Page 128<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: GC / sa: AP


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

Tambang Batubara<br />

Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (Rp bn)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 4,124 7,216 10,097 8,279 Net Fixed Assets 361 583 1,940 4,828<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (2,474) (3,686) (4,505) (4,708) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 1,650 3,530 5,593 3,571 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 487 574 591 609<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (704) (1,036) (1,817) (1,490) Cash & ST Invts 2,223 3,042 4,067 3,658<br />

Operating Profit 946 2,494 3,775 2,081 Inventory 271 420 602 629<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 33 (51) 0 0 Debtors 561 1,377 1,982 1,625<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 1 1 1 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 26 112 112 112<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 79 108 (36) (278) Total Assets 3,928 6,107 9,294 11,462<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,058 2,552 3,741 1,804 ST Debt 0 0 0 0<br />

Tax (297) (837) (1,047) (451) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 695 1,353 1,395 1,400<br />

Minority Interest (1) (7) (10) (8) LT Debt 0 0 1,282 3,441<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 422 676 710 710<br />

Net Profit 760 1,708 2,684 1,345 Shareholder’s Equity 2,799 3,998 5,828 5,831<br />

Net Profit before Except. 760 1,708 2,684 1,345 Minority Interests 12 80 80 80<br />

EBITDA 1,053 2,514 3,875 2,278 Total Cap. & Liab. 3,928 6,107 9,294 11,462<br />

Sales Gth (%) 16.7 75.0 39.9 (18.0) Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 163 555 1,301 966<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 59.4 138.7 54.1 (41.2) Net Cash/(Debt) 2,223 3,042 2,785 217<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 44.0 163.7 51.4 (44.9)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 56.6 124.6 57.1 (49.9)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 28.1 32.8 28.0 25.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 1,058 2,552 3,741 1,804 Gross Margins (%) 40.0 48.9 55.4 43.1<br />

Dep. & Amort. 74 70 99 196 Opg Profit Margin (%) 22.9 34.6 37.4 25.1<br />

Tax Paid (297) (837) (1,047) (451) Net Profit Margin (%) 18.4 23.7 26.6 16.2<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 0 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 29.9 50.2 54.6 23.1<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 286 (995) (746) 335 ROA (%) 21.6 34.0 34.9 13.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 19 845 (27) (26) ROCE (%) 23.0 42.0 43.0 17.4<br />

Net Operating CF 1,141 1,628 2,019 1,858 Div Payout Ratio (%) 48.0 32.0 50.0 50.0<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (300) (429) (1,456) (3,084) Net Interest Cover (x) NM NM 105.1 7.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.2 1.4 1.3 0.8<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 59.1 49.0 60.7 79.5<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 8.8 8.5 7.5 9.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 54 0 34 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 40.5 34.9 42.3 49.8<br />

Net Investing CF (246) (429) (1,422) (3,084) Current Ratio (x) 4.4 3.7 4.8 4.3<br />

Div Paid (243) (380) (854) (1,342) Quick Ratio (x) 4.0 3.3 4.3 3.8<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 0 0 1,282 2,159 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) N/A N/A 113.6 89.6<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 277 0 0 0 Z-Score (X) 12.2 11.4 8.3 4.7<br />

Net Financing CF 34 (380) 428 817 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Rp) 965 1,320 1,209 94<br />

Net Cashflow 928 819 1,025 (409) Opg CFPS (Rp) 371 1,138 1,200 661<br />

Free CFPS (Rp) 365 520 245 (532)<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Quarterly Cash Flow Statement (Rp bn)<br />

FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008 FY Dec 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008<br />

Turnover 1,234 1,654 2,079 2,249 Cash Flow From Operations<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (670) (860) (975) (1,181) Net income 286 424 611 386<br />

Gross Profit 564 794 1,103 1,068 Deprec & Amortization 11 26 21 17<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (171) (229) (294) (343) Oth Non-Cash Adj (362) 122 (51) 118<br />

Operating Profit 394 566 809 725 Cash Flow From Operations (65) 573 580 521<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc (6) 7 28 (80) Cash Flow From Investing<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 1 Disposal Of Fixed Asst - - 55 -<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 19 23 29 37 Capital Ex/Prop Add (10) (102) - (30)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Oth Investing Activities (41) (0) (234) (67)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 407 596 866 683 Cash Flow From Investing (51) (102) (179) (98)<br />

Tax (121) (174) (254) (288) Cash Flow From Financing<br />

Minority Interest 0 3 (1) (9) Dividends Paid - (380) - -<br />

Net Profit 286 424 611 386 Inc(Dec) In ST Borrow - - - -<br />

Net profit bef Except. 286 424 611 386 Increase: LT borrow - - - -<br />

EBITDA 388 573 837 646 Reimburse Of LT Borrow - - - -<br />

Inc capital stock - - - -<br />

Sales Gth (%) 11.0 34.1 25.7 8.2 Decrease In Cap Stocks - - - -<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 58.3 47.6 46.0 (22.8) Oth Financing Activities (2) (6) 4 22<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 67.6 43.7 43.1 (10.4) Cash Flow From Financing (2) (386) 4 22<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 44.0 48.0 44.1 (36.8) Net Changes In Cash (117) 85 405 446<br />

Gross Margins (%) 45.7 48.0 53.1 47.5<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 31.9 34.2 38.9 32.2<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 23.2 25.6 29.4 17.2<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 129


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V recommendations are based an Absolute Total Return* Rating system, defined as follows:<br />

STRONG BUY (>20% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, with identifiable share price catalysts within this time frame)<br />

BUY (>15% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months for small caps, >10% for large caps)<br />

HOLD (0-15% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months for small caps, 0-10% for large caps)<br />

FULLY VALUED (negative total return i.e. > -10% over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months)<br />

SELL (negative total return of > -20% over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, with identifiable catalysts within this time frame)<br />

* Share price appreciation + dividends<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> is available on <strong>the</strong> following electronic platforms: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> (www.dbsvresearch.com); Thomson<br />

(www.thomson.com/financial); Factset (www.factset.com); Reuters (www.rbr.reuters.com); Capital IQ (www.capitaliq.com) and Bloomberg<br />

(<strong>DBS</strong>R GO). For access, please contact your <strong>DBS</strong>V salesperson.<br />

GENERAL DISCLOSURE/DISCLAIMER<br />

This document is published by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VR"), a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong><br />

(Singapore) Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VS") and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> Holdings Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VH"). [This report is<br />

intended for clients of <strong>DBS</strong>V Group only and no part of this document may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or (ii)<br />

redistributed without <strong>the</strong> prior written consent of <strong>DBS</strong>VR.]<br />

The research is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not make any representation or warranty as to its<br />

accuracy, completeness or correctness. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. This document is prepared for general circulation.<br />

Any recommendation contained in this document does not have regard to <strong>the</strong> specific investment objectives, financial situation and <strong>the</strong> particular<br />

needs of any specific addressee. This document is for <strong>the</strong> information of addressees only and is not to be taken in substitution for <strong>the</strong> exercise of<br />

judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. <strong>DBS</strong>VR accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential<br />

loss arising from any use of this document or fur<strong>the</strong>r communication given in relation to this document. This document is not to be construed as an<br />

offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. <strong>DBS</strong>VH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd. <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd along with its<br />

affiliates and/or persons associated with any of <strong>the</strong>m may from time to time have interests in <strong>the</strong> securities mentioned in this document. <strong>DBS</strong>VR,<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and <strong>the</strong>ir associates, <strong>the</strong>ir directors, and/or employees may have positions in, and may effect transactions in securities<br />

mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking and o<strong>the</strong>r banking services for <strong>the</strong>se companies.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VUSA does not have its own investment banking or research department, nor has it participated in any investment banking transaction as a<br />

manager or co-manager in <strong>the</strong> past twelve months. Any US persons wishing to obtain fur<strong>the</strong>r information, including any clarification on disclosures<br />

in this disclaimer, or to effect a transaction in any security discussed in this document should contact <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA exclusively.<br />

ANALYST CERTIFICATION<br />

The research analyst primarily responsible for <strong>the</strong> content of this research report, in part or in whole, certifies that <strong>the</strong> views about <strong>the</strong><br />

companies and <strong>the</strong>ir securities expressed in this report accurately reflect his/her personal views. The analyst also certifies that no part of his/her<br />

compensation was, is, or will be, directly, or indirectly, related to specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. As of<br />

27 Mar 2009, <strong>the</strong> analyst and his / her spouse and/or relatives who are financially dependent on <strong>the</strong> analyst, do not hold interests in <strong>the</strong><br />

securities recommended in this report (“interest” includes direct or indirect ownership of securities, directorships and trustee positions).<br />

COMPANY-SPECIFIC / REGULATORY DISCLOSURES<br />

1. <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd and its subsidiaries do not have a proprietary position in <strong>the</strong> securities<br />

recommended in this report as of 26 Mar 2009.<br />

3. <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (USA) Inc ("<strong>DBS</strong>VUSA"), a U.S.-registered<br />

broker-dealer, beneficially own a total of 1% or more of any class of common equity securities of <strong>the</strong> Suntec Reit, CSE<br />

Global as of 27 Mar 2009.<br />

4. Compensation for investment banking services:<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA have received compensation, within <strong>the</strong> past 12<br />

months, and within <strong>the</strong> next 3 months may receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking<br />

services from CapitaRetail China Trust, City Development, Mapletree logistic, ASL Marine and Parkway Life<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VUSA does not have its own investment banking or research department, nor has it participated in any<br />

investment banking transaction as a manager or co-manager in <strong>the</strong> past twelve months. Any US persons wishing<br />

to obtain fur<strong>the</strong>r information, including any clarification on disclosures in this disclaimer, or to effect a transaction<br />

in any security discussed in this document should contact <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA exclusively.<br />

Page 130


Regional Equity Strategy 2Q 2009<br />

RESTRICTIONS ON DISTRIBUTION<br />

General<br />

This report is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or<br />

resident of or located in any locality, state, country or o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdiction where such distribution, publication,<br />

availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation.<br />

Australia<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Singapore<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Dubai/<br />

United Arab Emirates<br />

United States<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions<br />

This report is being distributed in Australia by <strong>DBS</strong>VR and <strong>DBS</strong>VS, which are exempted from <strong>the</strong> requirement to<br />

hold an Australian financial services licence under <strong>the</strong> Corporation Act 2001 [“CA] in respect of financial services<br />

provided to <strong>the</strong> recipients. <strong>DBS</strong>VR and <strong>DBS</strong>VS are regulated by <strong>the</strong> Monetary Authority of Singapore [“MAS”]<br />

under <strong>the</strong> laws of Singapore, which differ from Australian laws. Distribution of this report is intended only for<br />

“wholesale investors” within <strong>the</strong> meaning of <strong>the</strong> CA.<br />

This report is being distributed in Hong Kong by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> (Hong Kong) Limited which is licensed and<br />

regulated by <strong>the</strong> Hong Kong <strong>Securities</strong> and Futures Commission.<br />

This report is being distributed in Singapore by <strong>DBS</strong>VR, which holds a Financial Adviser’s licence and is regulated<br />

by <strong>the</strong> MAS. This report may additionally be distributed in Singapore by <strong>DBS</strong>VS (Company Regn. No.<br />

198600294G), which is an Exempt Financial Adviser as defined under <strong>the</strong> Financial Advisers Act. Any research<br />

report produced by a foreign <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> entity, analyst or affiliate is distributed in Singapore only to<br />

“Institutional Investors”, “Expert Investors” or “Accredited Investors” as defined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> and Futures<br />

Act, Chap. 289 of Singapore. Any distribution of research reports published by a foreign-related corporation of<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VR/<strong>DBS</strong>VS to “Accredited Investors” is provided pursuant to <strong>the</strong> approval by MAS of research distribution<br />

arrangements under Paragraph 11 of <strong>the</strong> First Schedule to <strong>the</strong> FAA.<br />

This report is being distributed in <strong>the</strong> UK by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (UK) Ltd, who is an authorised person in <strong>the</strong><br />

meaning of <strong>the</strong> Financial Services and Markets Act and is regulated by The Financial Services Authority. <strong>Research</strong><br />

distributed in <strong>the</strong> UK is intended only for institutional clients.<br />

This report is being distributed in Dubai/United Arab Emirates by <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd, Dubai (PO Box 506538, 3 rd Floor,<br />

Building 3, Gate Precinct, DIFC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates) and is intended only for clients who meet <strong>the</strong><br />

DFSA regulatory criteria to be a Professional Client. It should not be relied upon by or distributed to Retail<br />

Clients. <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd, Dubai is regulated by <strong>the</strong> Dubai Financial Services Authority.<br />

Nei<strong>the</strong>r this report nor any copy hereof may be taken or distributed into <strong>the</strong> United States or to any U.S. person<br />

except in compliance with any applicable U.S. laws and regulations.<br />

In any o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions, except if o<strong>the</strong>rwise restricted by laws or regulations, this report is intended only for<br />

qualified, professional, institutional or sophisticated investors as defined in <strong>the</strong> laws and regulations of such<br />

jurisdictions.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd – 8 Cross Street, #02-01 PWC Building, Singapore 048424<br />

Tel. 65-6533 9688, Fax: 65-6226 8048<br />

Company Regn. No. 198600295W<br />

Page 131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!