20.11.2014 Views

Download - OAR@ICRISAT

Download - OAR@ICRISAT

Download - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B i o c h e m i s t r y and N u t r i t i o n<br />

The u l t i m a t e t e s t o f a l l food crops i s t h e i r<br />

cooking v a l u e ; hence, a l l improvement p r o ­<br />

grams s h o u l d i n c l u d e c o o k i n g t e s t s . E i g h t y -<br />

s i x Pusa types of a r h a r (Cajanus) and s i x<br />

h y b r i d s were t e s t e d f o r t h e i r c o o k i n g qual<br />

i t y and c l a s s i f i e d i n t o t h r e e main g r o u p s .<br />

Some c o r r e l a t i o n was p r e s e n t between t a s t e<br />

and adherence of husk to d h a l , c o l o r of raw<br />

and cooked d h a l , and cooking t i m e . No<br />

r e l a t i o n s h i p was observed between t h e t a s t e<br />

o f d h a l and t h e h a b i t , m a t u r i t y , o r f l o w e r ­<br />

i n g o f p l a n t , pod c o l o r , s i z e and shape o f<br />

g r a i n , y i e l d , percentage o f h u s k , and<br />

c o n s i s t e n c y o f cooked d h a l .<br />

BRAHAM, J . E . , M.N. ROLANDO, B. RICHARDO,<br />

and J. ROBERTO. 1965.<br />

The e f f e c t of c o o k i n g and of amino a c i d<br />

s u p p l e m e n t a t i o n o n t h e n u t r i e n t v a l u e o f<br />

the p r o t e i n o f the gandul o r pigeonpea<br />

(Cajanus indicus). ( S p a n i s h / E n g l i s h summary).<br />

Archos Venez. N u t r . 1 5 : 1 9 - 3 2 . 256<br />

S t u d i e s showed t h a t pigeonpea meal 20-mlnute<br />

a u t o c l a v e d a t 121°C, supplemented w i t h 0 . 1 %<br />

t r y p t o p h a n and 0.3% m e t h i o n i n e , was comparab<br />

l e t o c a s e i n i n r a t d i e t s f e d a t 10% p r o ­<br />

t e i n l e v e l . Cajanus seeds and meal were<br />

found d e f i c i e n t i n s u l f u r , amino a c i d s ,<br />

and t r y p t o p h a n .<br />

BRESSANI, R., and L.G. ELIAS. 1977.<br />

The problem o f legume p r o t e i n d i g e s t i b i l i t y ,<br />

pp. 6 1 - 7 2 . In N u t r i t i o n a l standards and<br />

methods of e v a l u a t i o n f o r food legume breede<br />

r s . I n t e r n a t i o n a l Working Group o n N u t r i ­<br />

t i o n a l Standards and Methods of E v a l u a t i o n<br />

f o r food legume b r e e d e r s . IDRC P u b l .<br />

TS7e. 257<br />

An a n a l y s i s of the low p r o t e i n - d i g e s t i b i l i t y<br />

of legume g r a i n s and p o s s i b l e reasons f o r<br />

i t . I f these are i d e n t i f i e d and c o u l d b e<br />

e l i m i n a t e d , beans w i l l make a b e t t e r n u t r i ­<br />

t i o n a l c o n t r i b u t i o n than they have made<br />

d u r i n g the 4,000 years s i n c e t h e i r consumpt<br />

i o n began. The paper d i s c u s s e s t h e problem<br />

o f legume p r o t e i n d i g e s t i b i l i t y and the role<br />

p l a y e d i n i t b y each o f these f a c t o r s :<br />

a n t i - p h y s i o l o g i c a l f a c t o r s , h e a t t r e a t m e n t ,<br />

w a t e r - s o l u b l e n i t r o g e n f r a c t i o n s o f cooked<br />

beans, p r o t e i n s r e s i s t a n t t o enzymatic<br />

h y d r o l y s i s , seedcoat p i g m e n t s , and r a t e o f<br />

passage o f food r e s i d u e s .<br />

CHATTOPADHYAYA, H . , and S. BANERJEE. 1 9 5 1 .<br />

S t u d i e s on t h e c h o l i n e c o n t e n t of some<br />

common I n d i a n p u l s e s . Fd Res. 1 6 ( 3 ) :<br />

2 3 0 - 2 3 1 . 258<br />

Estimates t h e c h o l i n e c o n t e n t of some<br />

common food s t u f f s in B e n g a l . The c h o l i n e<br />

c o n t e n t , expressed a s c h o l i n e c h l o r i d e o n<br />

dry b a s i s (mg/100 gm), was 201 ( ± 2 . 2 ) .<br />

V a r i a t i o n s i n c h e m i c a l c o m p o s i t i o n a r e<br />

a t t r i b u t e d t o s o i l and c l i m a t i c f a c t o r s .<br />

CHOUDHURY, KAMAL, and M.M. RAHMAN. 1973.<br />

F a t t y a c i d s in d i f f e r e n t p u l s e s produced<br />

and consumed i n Bangladesh. J . F d S c i .<br />

T e c h n o l . 2 4 ( 4 ) : 4 7 1 . 259<br />

The t o t a l f a t ranged from 1 to 1.7% of d r y<br />

w e i g h t in m u s u r i (Lens esaulenta), a r h a r<br />

{Cajanus indicus), matar (Pisum sativum),<br />

k h e s a r i (Lathyrus sativus), and m a s h - k a l a i<br />

(Phaseolus mungo). The f a t from m u s u r i ,<br />

a r h a r , m a t a r , and k h e s a r i had 18 to 28%<br />

p a l m i t i c a c i d and 54 to 57% l i n o l e i c a c i d .<br />

The u n s a t u r a t e d : s a t u r a t e d f a t t y a c i d r a t i o s<br />

i n the f a t e x t r a c t s ranged from 2.3 f o r<br />

a r h a r t o 4.4 f o r m u s u r i .<br />

CUBAS, A . C . 1950.<br />

N u t r i t i o n a l study of pigeonpea {Cajanus<br />

indiaus). A n . Fac. Farm. Bioqulm U n i v .<br />

S. Marcos (Lima, Peru) 1:87. 260<br />

DAKSHINAMURTHI, K. 1955.<br />

Choline c o n t e n t of some South I n d i a n food<br />

s t u f f s ( d h a l a r h a r ) . C u r r . S c i . 2 4 ( 5 ) :<br />

194. 261<br />

Cereals and common v e g e t a b l e s are low in<br />

c h o l i n e , a n i m p o r t a n t n u t r i t i o n a l e l e m e n t ,<br />

d h a l a r h a r {Cajanus indiaus) c o n t a i n s<br />

a p p r e c i a b l e amounts o f c h o l i n e .<br />

DANIEL, V . A . , B.L.M. DESAI, R. SUBRAMANYA,<br />

T . S . URS, S. VENKATARAO, M. SWAMINATHAN,<br />

and H.A.B. PARPIA. 1968.<br />

The supplementary v a l u e of Bengal gram,<br />

red gram, soybean, as compared w i t h skim<br />

m i l k powder to poor I n d i a n d i e t s based on<br />

r a g i , k a f f i r c o r n , and p e a r l m i l l e t .<br />

I n d i a n J . N u t r . D i e t e t . 5 ( 4 ) : 2 8 3 - 2 9 1 . 262<br />

Soybean at 5 to 6% l e v e l s was found as<br />

e f f e c t i v e as Bengal gram or red gram at<br />

15 to 16% l e v e l as a supplement to the poor<br />

I n d i a n d i e t s based o n ragi, k a f f i r c o r n ,<br />

and p e a r l m i l l e t .<br />

DANIEL, V . A . , R. LEELA, R. SUBRAMANYA,<br />

T . S . URS, S. VENKATARAO, RAJALAKSHMI,<br />

M. SWAMINATHAN, and H.A.B. PARPIA. 1965.<br />

The supplementary v a l u e of p r o t e i n s and<br />

soybean as compared w i t h those of Bengal<br />

gram, r e d gram and skim m i l k powder to<br />

poor I n d i a n d i e t s based on r i c e and<br />

w h e a t . I n d i a n J . N u t r . D i e t e t .<br />

2 ( 3 ) : 1 2 8 - 1 3 3 . 263<br />

The supplementary v a l u e of soybean ( a t 5.5<br />

to 6.0% l e v e l ) , Bengal gram, and r e d gram<br />

( a t 15.0 t o 16.0% l e v e l ) t o poor I n d i a n<br />

d i e t s based on r i c e (PRD) and wheat (PWD),<br />

p r o v i d i n g about 2.5% e x t r a p r o t e i n i n t h e<br />

case of r i c e d i e t s and 2.2% in t h e case of<br />

wheat d i e t s , has been s t u d i e d by growth<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!