Download - OAR@ICRISAT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y w i t h the nonpathogenic F. oxyeporum f. s p . c i c e r i and F, oxyeporum f. s p . vasinfectum. KAISER, S . A . K . , and P . K . S . GUPTA. 1975. I n f e c t i o n and p a t h o l o g i c a l h i s t o l o g y o f plgeonpea (Cajanus cajan ( L . ) M i l l s p . ) i n o c u l a t e d w i t h pathogenic and n o n - p a t h o genic formae s p e c i a l e s of Fusarium oxysporum. Z . p f l a n z k . p f l a n z s . 8 2 ( 8 - 9 ) : 4 8 5 - 4 9 2 . 942 I n o c u l a t i o n s t u d i e s u s i n g t h e s u s c e p t i b l e v a r i e t y EB-3 and t h e formae s p e c i a l e s udum, vasinfectum and c i c e r i showed F. oxyeporum f. s p . udum to be h o s t s p e c i f i c . The o t h e r formae s p e c i a l e s produced i n i t i a l w i l t symptoms b u t t h e s e e d l i n g s then r e c o v e r e d and developed new l e a v e s . Hyphae of a l l t h r e e formae s p e c i a l e s invaded t h e seedl i n g s , d i s t r i b u t i o n b e i n g s i m i l a r , b u t the e x t e n t o f i n v a s i o n b e i n g much g r e a t e r i n p a t h o g e n i c formae s p e c i a l e s . V a s c u l a r t i s s u e s were p a r t i a l l y a f f e c t e d . KALYANASUNDARAM, R. 1952. A s c o r b i c a c i d and Fusarium w i l t e d p l a n t s . P r o c . I n d i a n Acad. S c i . ( S e c t . B ) 3 6 ( 3 ) : 1 0 2 - 1 0 4 . 943 S t u d i e s in Madras on Fusarium vaeinfeotum on c o t t o n and F. udum on r e d gram (C.cajan) showed r e d u c t i o n i n a s c o r b i c a c i d c o n t e n t o f h o s t leaves and i n c r e a s e i n r e d u c i n g s u g a r s . C o n c l u s i o n i s t h a t r e d u c t i o n i n c h l o r o p h y l l and r e t a r d a t i o n o f g r o w t h p r e c e d i n g w i l t i n g causes decrease i n a s c o r b i c a c i d c o n t e n t . KAMAL, T . P . MALL, and R.P. SRIVASTAVA. 1975. Rhizosphere m y c o f l o r a s o f some v i r u s i n f e c t e d c u l t i v a r s o f a r h a r (Cajanus c a j a n ( L . ) M i l l s p . ) . Technology 1 1 ( 2 - 3 ) : 2 3 4 - 2 3 8 . 944 The r h i z o s p h e r e m y c o p o p u l a t i o n o f d i f f e r e n t a r h a r c u l t i v a r s d i f f e r e d c o n s i d e r a b l y . There were myco-organic makeup d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e r o o t s o f h e a l t h y and d i s e a s e d p l a n t s . The r h i z o s p h e r e e f f e c t was always g r e a t e r i n t h e h e a l t h y p l a n t s than i n t h e i r diseased c o u n t e r p a r t s . The minimum r h i z o sphere e f f e c t was m a n i f e s t e d b y c u l t i v a r Prabhat i n f e c t e d w i t h t h e severe s t r a i n o f the v i r u s . The r e s u l t s r e a d i l y f i t i n w i t h t h e p h y s i o l o g i c a l derangements o f t h e p l a n t s . The degree o f q u a n t i t a t i v e r e d u c t i o n i n t h e r h i z o s p h e r e m y c o f l o r a o f diseased p l a n t s appeared t o b e d i r e c t l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e degree o f t h e s e v e r i t y o f i n f e c t i o n i n c u l t i v a r T - 1 7 . KAMAL, T . P . MALL, and R.P. SRIVASTAVA. 1975. M i c r o f u n g i a t t h e r o o t - s o i l i n t e r f a c e o f a r h a r (Cajanus c a j a n ( L . ) M i l l s p . ) i n f e c t e d b y plgeonpea s t e r i l i t y mosaic v i r u s . Technology 11(4) : 434-436. 945 There was no d i f f e r e n c e in t h e t o t a l number o f species a s s o c i a t e d w i t h h e a l t h y and diseased r h i z o s p h e r e . C e r t a i n f u n g i were c o n f i n e d t o t h e r h i z o s p h e r e e i t h e r o f the h e a l t h y o r t h e diseased p l a n t s . Colony c o u n t s / g o f d r y s o i l were more i n t h e h e a l t h y p l a n t s than i n the diseased ones. S e v e r a l Penicillia and Aspergilli, p a r t i - c u l a r l y t h e members of Aspergillus ustus g r o u p , were c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f the r h i z o - sphere under b o t h diseased and h e a l t h y c o n d i t i o n s . The r h i z o s p h e r e e f f e c t was more prominent in t h e case of h e a l t h y p l a n t s . KAMAL and AJAY KUMAR VERMA. 1976. M i c r o f u n g a l f l o r a i n t h e r o o t r e g i o n o f a r h a r (Cajanus c a j a n ( L . ) M i l l s p . ) . F e r t i l . T e c h n o l . 1 3 ( 2 - 3 ) : 1 5 5 - 1 5 7 . 946 Fungal p o p u l a t i o n i n r h i z o s p h e r e - f r e e s o i l , r h i z o s p h e r e s o i l and r h i z o p l a n e o f arhar have been s t u d i e d . KAMAT, M . N . , and M.K. PATEL. 1948. Some new h o s t s of Oidiopsis taurioa ( L e v . ) Salmon in Bombay. I n d i a n P h y t o p a t h . 1 ( 2 ) : 1 5 3 - 1 5 8 . 947 This fungus was c o l l e c t e d from plgeonpea and o t h e r h o s t s . Each c o l l e c t i o n was found t o r e i n f e c t i t s own h o s t o n l y , showing t h a t t h e fungus was h i g h l y s p e c i a l i z e d . KANDASWAMY, T . K . , and K. RAMAKRISHNAN. 1960. A n e p i p h y t o t i c o f plgeonpea s t e r i l i t y mosaic a t Coimbatore. Madras A g r i c . J . 4 7 : 4 4 0 - 4 4 1 . 948 No s i g n s of t o l e r a n c e or r e s i s t a n c e to s t e r i l i t y mosaic v i r u s were n o t e d i n a group of over 100 v a r i e t i e s of Cajanus oajan, grown at t h e M i l l e t Breeding S t a t i o n , Coimbatore, I n d i a . KERNKAMP, M . F . , and G.A. HEMERIK. 1953. The r e l a t i o n of Ascochyta imperfecta to a l f a l f a seed p r o d u c t i o n i n M i n n e s o t a . P h y t o p a t h . 4 3 ( 7 ) : 3 7 8 - 3 8 3 . 949 Plgeonpea r e a c t e d p o s i t i v e l y t o i n o c u l a t i o n w i t h Aeooohyta imperfecta. 120
Pathology KHAN, W.M.A., and R.K. SINGH. 1974. Anthracnose of arhar incited by Colletotrichum truncatum- Indian Phytopath. 27:622-624. 950 Stem anthracnose of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) caused by Colletotrichum truncation (Sen.) Andrush and Moore, was observed in the last week of September 1972. Survey of varieties indicated that only some of the early maturing varieties were free from the disease during this period. 'Infection was confined to main axis and lateral branches. Defoliation and drying-up of the complete plant were the ultimate signs of the infection. KHANNA, R.N., and R.S. SINGH. 1975. Microbial populations of pigeonpea rhizosphere in amended soils. Indian J. Mycol. PI. Pathol. 5(2):131-138. 951 Count of fungi and actinomycetes had inverse relationship with plant age in nonamended s o i l , while optimum bacterial activity occurred at maximum vegetative growth of plant. Oil cake was stimulatory to microflora and sawdust was inhibitory. The inhibitory effect was overcome by supplemental nitrogen. Rhizosphere of pigeonpea significantly changed the effect of amendments on microflora. It reduced stimulatory effects of amendments on bacteria and actinomycetes but accentuated inhibitory effect of sawdust on these groups. KOSHY, P.K. 1968. Studies on the cyst-forming nematode of pigeonpea. Ph.D. (1968) Thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. 952 KOSHY, P.K., and GOPAL SWARUP. 1967. Factors affecting emergence of larvae from cyst of Heterodera oajani Koshy. Indian J. Nematol. 1:209-219. 953 Emergence took place between 15 and 37°C, with 29°C optimum. More emergence was obtained from cysts conditioned to 40°C than those at 12°C. Aeration did not affect emergence of larvae. But constant exposure to light gave a significantly higher hatch than subjecting to total darkness. Optimum pH was 10.5. Root leachates from Cajanus aajan stimulated emergence of larvae from cysts. The cysts stored in air-dried soil under laboratory conditions remained viable for at least 2 years. KOSHY, P.K., and GOPAL SWARUP. 1971. Investigations on the l i f e history of the pigeonpea cyst nematode Heterodera cajani. Indian J. Nematol. 1:44-51. 954 Temperature was an important factor governing the time required to complete the l i f e cycle. At a soil temperature of 84°F the nematode completed one generation in 16 days, whereas under cool conditions (10- 25°C/50-75°F) the time required was 45 to 80 days. The nematode was able to reproduce parthenogenetically, though it is a bisexual species. For rapid multiplication, however males were considered necessary. KOSHY, P.K., and GOPAL SWARUP. 1971. On the number of generations of Heterodera oajani, the pigeonpea cyst nematode, in a year. Indian J. Nematol. 1:88-90. 955 H. cajani could complete nine generations in a year under laboratory conditions. Duration of l i f e cycle was prolonged during winter months. The favorable multiplication of the nematode was from June to September and April to June. KOSHY, P.K., and GOPAL SWARUP. 1972. Susceptibility of plants to pigeonpea cyst nematode, Heterodera cajani. Indian J. Nematol. 2:1-6. 956 One hundred and five plant species, representing 58 genera in 21 families, were tested for their suitability as hosts of Heterodera oajani', 19 of them (family : Leguminosae) were recorded as hosts. KULDIP SINGH, B.S. DAHIYA, and J.S. CHOHAN. 1975. Evaluation of arhar (Cajanus cajan) germplasm lines against the s t e r i l i t y disease in the Punjab. PAU Res. J. 12(3): 327-328. 957 Two hundred and thirty-four lines were screened for reaction to the s t e r i l i t y virus in 1973 and 1974. L-3 and P-4785 were resistant and 16 others were tolerant. KULKARNI, Y.S., M.K. PATEL, and S.G. ABHYANKAR. 1953. A new bacterial leaf spot and stem canker of pigeonpea. Indian Phytopath. 5(1): 21-22. 958 Gives an extended account of the disease and i t s causal agent and l i s t s factors conducive to disease development. Since the pathogen infects pigeonpea alone, showing host range specificity, it is proposed as a new species to be called Xanthomonas c a j a n i . 121
Page 3 and 4:
AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PIGEON
Page 5:
To those people who are devoted to
Page 9:
F O R E W O R D I C R I S A T i s p
Page 13 and 14:
L I S T O F A B B R E V I A T I O N
Page 15 and 16:
L i s t o f A b b r e v i a t i o n
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23:
Page 26 and 27:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y A
Page 28 and 29:
Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y s
Page 30 and 31:
Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y N
Page 32 and 33:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y d
Page 34 and 35:
Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y I
Page 36 and 37:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y F
Page 38 and 39:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y p
Page 40 and 41:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y D
Page 42 and 43:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y N
Page 44 and 45:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y t
Page 46 and 47:
Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y S
Page 48 and 49:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y U
Page 50 and 51:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y c
Page 52 and 53:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y T
Page 54 and 55:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y e
Page 56 and 57:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y C
Page 58 and 59:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y K
Page 60 and 61:
Pigeonpea Bibliography MODI, J . D
Page 62 and 63:
Plgeonpea Bibliography PREMA, L., a
Page 64 and 65:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y e
Page 66 and 67:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y t
Page 68 and 69:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y l
Page 70 and 71:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y m
Page 72 and 73:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y B
Page 74 and 75:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y A
Page 76 and 77:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y a
Page 78 and 79:
Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y I
Page 80 and 81:
Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y K
Page 82 and 83: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y o
Page 84 and 85: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y R
Page 86 and 87: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y s
Page 88 and 89: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y T
Page 92 and 93: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y D
Page 94 and 95: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y m
Page 96 and 97: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y D
Page 98 and 99: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y I
Page 100 and 101: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y O
Page 102 and 103: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y I
Page 104 and 105: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y w
Page 106 and 107: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y a
Page 108 and 109: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y D
Page 112 and 113: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y J
Page 114 and 115: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y M
Page 116 and 117: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y R
Page 118 and 119: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y s
Page 122 and 123: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y S
Page 124 and 125: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y A
Page 126 and 127: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y e
Page 130 and 131: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y H
Page 134 and 135: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y K
Page 136 and 137: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y M
Page 138 and 139: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y M
Page 140 and 141: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y i
Page 142 and 143: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y P
Page 144 and 145: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y R
Page 146 and 147: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y n
Page 148 and 149: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y S
Page 158 and 159: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y P
Page 160 and 161: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y f
Page 166 and 167: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y g
Page 168 and 169: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y T
Page 170 and 171: Plgeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y o
Page 172 and 173: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y B
Page 174 and 175: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y G
Page 176 and 177: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y M
Page 178 and 179: Pigeonpea B i b l i o g r a p h y Q
Page 183 and 184:
SUBJECT INDEX AGRONOMY C r o p p i
Page 185 and 186:
S u b j e c t Index MICROBIOLOGY Cr
Page 187 and 188:
W O R D I N D E X Aoanthomia toment
Page 189 and 190:
Word Index E x e l a s t i s atomos
Page 191 and 192:
Word Index Obovate l e a f l e t s
Page 193:
Word Index Vigna nilotica, 79 Vigna
show all

Download - OAR@ICRISAT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?