Download PDF - Field Exchange - Emergency Nutrition Network
Download PDF - Field Exchange - Emergency Nutrition Network
Download PDF - Field Exchange - Emergency Nutrition Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Field</strong> Article<br />
Nutriset, Niamey, Mali, 2007<br />
New method for assessing acute malnutrition<br />
in nomadic pastoralist populations<br />
By Anne-Marie Mayer, Mark Myatt, Myriam Ait Aissa and Nuria Salse<br />
Anne-Marie Mayer is a technical consultant for this project<br />
and carried out the first field test in Mali with ACH. She has<br />
a PhD in International <strong>Nutrition</strong> from Cornell University and<br />
has worked in Ethiopia with Save the Children UK on<br />
pastoralist nutrition surveys.<br />
Mark Myatt was the statistical consultant for the project. He<br />
is a consultant epidemiologist and senior research fellow at<br />
the Division of Opthalmology, Institute of Opthalmology,<br />
University College London. His areas of expertise include<br />
infectious disease, nutrition and survey design.<br />
Myriam Ait Aissa is the research manager at Action Contre<br />
la Faim- International <strong>Network</strong> (ACF-IN) since 2007.<br />
Previously, she worked as a research manager on food security<br />
issues in North Africa, South America, Canada and in<br />
research management.<br />
Nuria Salse is the <strong>Nutrition</strong> and Health Advisor for Accion<br />
Contra el Hambre (ACH) (Action Against Hunger, Spain).<br />
Previously she spent several years working on nutrition and<br />
medical programmes in Angola, Guinea Conakry, Niger and<br />
Argentina.<br />
Camels at a water point in Kidal.<br />
The authors would like to acknowledge ACF-International <strong>Network</strong> for financial and managerial support, ACF-Spain for hosting the project in Mali and the peer review<br />
group for reviewing the method and providing information on pastoralist communities: Andrew Hall (Westminster University, UK), Phil McKinney (Consultant), William<br />
Kalsbeek (University of North Carolina, USA) , Jon Pedersen (Institute for Anvendte Internasjonale, Norway), Fiona Underwood (Reading University, UK), Tina Lloren (Save<br />
the Children USA), Francesco Checchi (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK), Megan Deitchler (FANTA), Andre Briend (WHO), Chris Leather (Oxfam GB),<br />
Claudine Meyers (Oxfam GB, Kenya), Orla O’Neill (Concern, Ethiopia), Grainne Maloney (FSAU, Somalia), Peter Hailey (Unicef, Kenya), Filippo Dibari (Valid international), Lio<br />
Fieschi (Valid International), Fabienne Nackers (MSF Belgium), David Crooks (Tear Fund). The authors also acknowledge the survey team and ACF administration in Kidal,<br />
Mali and the communities of Kidal for participating in the survey.<br />
This article describes a new survey method for<br />
assessing acute malnutrition in nomadic<br />
pastoralist populations, including a case study<br />
from Mali.<br />
The work presented here was commissioned<br />
by Action Contre la Faim-International<br />
<strong>Network</strong> (ACF-IN) and took place between<br />
May 2007 and June 2008. The research<br />
aimed to identify a novel method to assess the nutrition<br />
condition of pastoralist communities in countries<br />
where ACF operates: Mauritania, Burkina<br />
Faso, Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia,<br />
Uganda, and Kenya. Pastoralist populations are<br />
vulnerable to shocks that result in nutrition risks, e.g.<br />
drought, animal disease, market disruption and<br />
closure of borders. However, the lack of a suitable<br />
sampling method for pastoralist surveys has<br />
contributed to the omission of pastoralist populations<br />
in emergency response and development<br />
programmes.<br />
The two main challenges in surveying pastoralist<br />
populations are:<br />
• Case definition for wasting (the usual weight<br />
-for-height (WH) based case definition has<br />
returned higher prevalence’s of malnutrition<br />
than Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC)<br />
in pastoralist children over 24 months of age) 1 .<br />
1<br />
Myatt, M, Duffield, A, Seal, A, and Pasteur, F. (2009). The<br />
effect of body shape on weight-for-height and mid upper arm<br />
circumference based case-definitions of acute malnutrition in<br />
Ethiopian children. Annals of Human Biology. Also see:<br />
(2008) Effect of body shape on weight-for-height and MUAC<br />
in Ethiopia. <strong>Emergency</strong> <strong>Nutrition</strong> <strong>Network</strong>. <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> 34.<br />
2<br />
(2005). Measuring Mortality, <strong>Nutrition</strong>al Status and Food<br />
Security in Crisis Situations: SMART METHODOLOGY. Version<br />
1 UNICEF and USAID<br />
3<br />
A spatial sampling method that uses a systematic spatial<br />
sample from a defined geographic area.<br />
4<br />
Myatt, M, Feleke, T, Sadler, K., and Collins, S (2005). A<br />
field trial of a survey method for estimating the coverage of<br />
• Selecting a representative sample in an area<br />
with a mobile, low density population for<br />
whom there are few reliable data on population<br />
size at the community level.<br />
Existing survey methods and their<br />
limitations in pastoralist settings<br />
Most surveys use a two-stage cluster sampling<br />
method, e.g. 30 by 30 cluster surveys and<br />
SMART surveys 2 . Both methods use primary<br />
sampling units (PSUs) selected using<br />
Probability Proportion to Size (PPS). This<br />
weights the sample according to community<br />
size, favouring large communities but does not<br />
ensure a geographically representative sample.<br />
In pastoralist areas, community-level population<br />
data are not available and hence the PPS<br />
method does not work. Furthermore, mobile<br />
communities (troupes) change size and composition<br />
throughout the year and may get smaller<br />
in crisis conditions as troupes disperse in search<br />
of scant grazing resources. Any official information<br />
is likely, therefore, to be out-of-date at the<br />
time of the survey.<br />
The Centric Systematic Area Sampling<br />
(CSAS) 3 approach has been used in estimating<br />
the coverage of feeding programmes 4 and for<br />
wide-area mapping of trachoma prevalence 5 .<br />
selective feeding programs. Bulletin of the World Health<br />
Organization 83, 20-26<br />
5<br />
Myatt, M, Mai, NP, Quynh, NQ, Nga, NH, Tai, HT, Long, NH,<br />
Minh, TH, and Limburg, H (2005). Using lot quality assurance<br />
sampling (LQAS) and area sampling to identify priority intervention<br />
areas for trachoma control activities-Experiences<br />
from Vietnam. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 83,<br />
756-763<br />
6<br />
ACF (2006). Enquete nutritionelle et de mortalite.<br />
Commune de Kidal, Mali 16-27, Dec 2006<br />
7<br />
Vincent, E, and Salse, N (June 2008). Methodology for a<br />
nutritional survey among the nomadic population of northern<br />
Mali. <strong>Emergency</strong> <strong>Nutrition</strong> <strong>Network</strong>. <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> 33, 14<br />
Trials of the use of CSAS and ‘snowball’<br />
sampling in retrospective mortality surveys are<br />
currently underway. The CSAS method has been<br />
adapted for nutrition surveys in pastoralist<br />
areas, for example in Mali in the same location as<br />
this field test 6,7 . Although addressing some of the<br />
problems of PPS methods, the main problem<br />
with CSAS is that it does not help the survey<br />
teams locate the mobile population and hence a<br />
lot of time is spent locating troupes.<br />
Development of the new method<br />
The new method was developed through a peer<br />
review process and designed to meet the criteria<br />
listed in Box 1. The peer review group were<br />
experts in the field of pastoralist society and<br />
Box 1: What are the requirements for a new<br />
method?<br />
The follow requirements were considered essential to<br />
define a new method:<br />
1. It should be a general method that can be<br />
adapted to the field situation using information<br />
gathered locally.<br />
2. The sampling method should not require population<br />
data at the start and should not require<br />
knowledge of the location of populations ahead of<br />
the survey.<br />
3. The method should be straightforward and efficient<br />
to conduct in the field.<br />
4. It should be representative of the whole population<br />
– even remote communities.<br />
5. An unbiased estimator should be used.<br />
6. The precision should be predictable across different<br />
sample sizes and be similar to that obtained by<br />
conventional cluster sampled surveys in sedentary<br />
rural populations.<br />
7. The case definition used should be appropriate for<br />
pastoralists and a good predictor of nutritionassociated<br />
mortality.<br />
30