19.11.2014 Views

Download PDF - Field Exchange - Emergency Nutrition Network

Download PDF - Field Exchange - Emergency Nutrition Network

Download PDF - Field Exchange - Emergency Nutrition Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Field</strong> Article<br />

Nutriset, Niamey, Mali, 2007<br />

New method for assessing acute malnutrition<br />

in nomadic pastoralist populations<br />

By Anne-Marie Mayer, Mark Myatt, Myriam Ait Aissa and Nuria Salse<br />

Anne-Marie Mayer is a technical consultant for this project<br />

and carried out the first field test in Mali with ACH. She has<br />

a PhD in International <strong>Nutrition</strong> from Cornell University and<br />

has worked in Ethiopia with Save the Children UK on<br />

pastoralist nutrition surveys.<br />

Mark Myatt was the statistical consultant for the project. He<br />

is a consultant epidemiologist and senior research fellow at<br />

the Division of Opthalmology, Institute of Opthalmology,<br />

University College London. His areas of expertise include<br />

infectious disease, nutrition and survey design.<br />

Myriam Ait Aissa is the research manager at Action Contre<br />

la Faim- International <strong>Network</strong> (ACF-IN) since 2007.<br />

Previously, she worked as a research manager on food security<br />

issues in North Africa, South America, Canada and in<br />

research management.<br />

Nuria Salse is the <strong>Nutrition</strong> and Health Advisor for Accion<br />

Contra el Hambre (ACH) (Action Against Hunger, Spain).<br />

Previously she spent several years working on nutrition and<br />

medical programmes in Angola, Guinea Conakry, Niger and<br />

Argentina.<br />

Camels at a water point in Kidal.<br />

The authors would like to acknowledge ACF-International <strong>Network</strong> for financial and managerial support, ACF-Spain for hosting the project in Mali and the peer review<br />

group for reviewing the method and providing information on pastoralist communities: Andrew Hall (Westminster University, UK), Phil McKinney (Consultant), William<br />

Kalsbeek (University of North Carolina, USA) , Jon Pedersen (Institute for Anvendte Internasjonale, Norway), Fiona Underwood (Reading University, UK), Tina Lloren (Save<br />

the Children USA), Francesco Checchi (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK), Megan Deitchler (FANTA), Andre Briend (WHO), Chris Leather (Oxfam GB),<br />

Claudine Meyers (Oxfam GB, Kenya), Orla O’Neill (Concern, Ethiopia), Grainne Maloney (FSAU, Somalia), Peter Hailey (Unicef, Kenya), Filippo Dibari (Valid international), Lio<br />

Fieschi (Valid International), Fabienne Nackers (MSF Belgium), David Crooks (Tear Fund). The authors also acknowledge the survey team and ACF administration in Kidal,<br />

Mali and the communities of Kidal for participating in the survey.<br />

This article describes a new survey method for<br />

assessing acute malnutrition in nomadic<br />

pastoralist populations, including a case study<br />

from Mali.<br />

The work presented here was commissioned<br />

by Action Contre la Faim-International<br />

<strong>Network</strong> (ACF-IN) and took place between<br />

May 2007 and June 2008. The research<br />

aimed to identify a novel method to assess the nutrition<br />

condition of pastoralist communities in countries<br />

where ACF operates: Mauritania, Burkina<br />

Faso, Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia,<br />

Uganda, and Kenya. Pastoralist populations are<br />

vulnerable to shocks that result in nutrition risks, e.g.<br />

drought, animal disease, market disruption and<br />

closure of borders. However, the lack of a suitable<br />

sampling method for pastoralist surveys has<br />

contributed to the omission of pastoralist populations<br />

in emergency response and development<br />

programmes.<br />

The two main challenges in surveying pastoralist<br />

populations are:<br />

• Case definition for wasting (the usual weight<br />

-for-height (WH) based case definition has<br />

returned higher prevalence’s of malnutrition<br />

than Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC)<br />

in pastoralist children over 24 months of age) 1 .<br />

1<br />

Myatt, M, Duffield, A, Seal, A, and Pasteur, F. (2009). The<br />

effect of body shape on weight-for-height and mid upper arm<br />

circumference based case-definitions of acute malnutrition in<br />

Ethiopian children. Annals of Human Biology. Also see:<br />

(2008) Effect of body shape on weight-for-height and MUAC<br />

in Ethiopia. <strong>Emergency</strong> <strong>Nutrition</strong> <strong>Network</strong>. <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> 34.<br />

2<br />

(2005). Measuring Mortality, <strong>Nutrition</strong>al Status and Food<br />

Security in Crisis Situations: SMART METHODOLOGY. Version<br />

1 UNICEF and USAID<br />

3<br />

A spatial sampling method that uses a systematic spatial<br />

sample from a defined geographic area.<br />

4<br />

Myatt, M, Feleke, T, Sadler, K., and Collins, S (2005). A<br />

field trial of a survey method for estimating the coverage of<br />

• Selecting a representative sample in an area<br />

with a mobile, low density population for<br />

whom there are few reliable data on population<br />

size at the community level.<br />

Existing survey methods and their<br />

limitations in pastoralist settings<br />

Most surveys use a two-stage cluster sampling<br />

method, e.g. 30 by 30 cluster surveys and<br />

SMART surveys 2 . Both methods use primary<br />

sampling units (PSUs) selected using<br />

Probability Proportion to Size (PPS). This<br />

weights the sample according to community<br />

size, favouring large communities but does not<br />

ensure a geographically representative sample.<br />

In pastoralist areas, community-level population<br />

data are not available and hence the PPS<br />

method does not work. Furthermore, mobile<br />

communities (troupes) change size and composition<br />

throughout the year and may get smaller<br />

in crisis conditions as troupes disperse in search<br />

of scant grazing resources. Any official information<br />

is likely, therefore, to be out-of-date at the<br />

time of the survey.<br />

The Centric Systematic Area Sampling<br />

(CSAS) 3 approach has been used in estimating<br />

the coverage of feeding programmes 4 and for<br />

wide-area mapping of trachoma prevalence 5 .<br />

selective feeding programs. Bulletin of the World Health<br />

Organization 83, 20-26<br />

5<br />

Myatt, M, Mai, NP, Quynh, NQ, Nga, NH, Tai, HT, Long, NH,<br />

Minh, TH, and Limburg, H (2005). Using lot quality assurance<br />

sampling (LQAS) and area sampling to identify priority intervention<br />

areas for trachoma control activities-Experiences<br />

from Vietnam. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 83,<br />

756-763<br />

6<br />

ACF (2006). Enquete nutritionelle et de mortalite.<br />

Commune de Kidal, Mali 16-27, Dec 2006<br />

7<br />

Vincent, E, and Salse, N (June 2008). Methodology for a<br />

nutritional survey among the nomadic population of northern<br />

Mali. <strong>Emergency</strong> <strong>Nutrition</strong> <strong>Network</strong>. <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> 33, 14<br />

Trials of the use of CSAS and ‘snowball’<br />

sampling in retrospective mortality surveys are<br />

currently underway. The CSAS method has been<br />

adapted for nutrition surveys in pastoralist<br />

areas, for example in Mali in the same location as<br />

this field test 6,7 . Although addressing some of the<br />

problems of PPS methods, the main problem<br />

with CSAS is that it does not help the survey<br />

teams locate the mobile population and hence a<br />

lot of time is spent locating troupes.<br />

Development of the new method<br />

The new method was developed through a peer<br />

review process and designed to meet the criteria<br />

listed in Box 1. The peer review group were<br />

experts in the field of pastoralist society and<br />

Box 1: What are the requirements for a new<br />

method?<br />

The follow requirements were considered essential to<br />

define a new method:<br />

1. It should be a general method that can be<br />

adapted to the field situation using information<br />

gathered locally.<br />

2. The sampling method should not require population<br />

data at the start and should not require<br />

knowledge of the location of populations ahead of<br />

the survey.<br />

3. The method should be straightforward and efficient<br />

to conduct in the field.<br />

4. It should be representative of the whole population<br />

– even remote communities.<br />

5. An unbiased estimator should be used.<br />

6. The precision should be predictable across different<br />

sample sizes and be similar to that obtained by<br />

conventional cluster sampled surveys in sedentary<br />

rural populations.<br />

7. The case definition used should be appropriate for<br />

pastoralists and a good predictor of nutritionassociated<br />

mortality.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!