19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64 ZERO-FORCING DECISION FEEDBACK EQUALIZATION<br />

the number of receive antennas exceeds the number of active codes, then we can<br />

tolerate ISI from the next symbol period, allowing us to use more received samples.<br />

This is usually not the case. With MIMO (same codes used on both transmit<br />

antennas), a ZF solution is possible if the number of receive antennas meets or<br />

exceeds the number of transmit antennas.<br />

For OFDM, ISI from future symbol periods is avoidable as long as the delay<br />

spread is less than the length of the CP (assuming the CP is discarded). ISI<br />

within a symbol period is avoided due the properties of the symbol waveforms.<br />

However, with MIMO, there is ISI between symbols transmitted from different<br />

transmit antennas but sharing the same subcarrier frequency. Like the CDM case,<br />

a ZF solution is possible if the number of receive antennas equals or exceeds the<br />

number of transmit antennas.<br />

Note: It is possible to use a CP with CDM. A rectangular windowing function<br />

would normally not be used, and the chip pulse shape would be root-Nyquist. As<br />

in the OFDM case, inter-block interference would be avoided by discarding the CP,<br />

as long as the delay spread is not too large.<br />

As for TDM, the possibility of multiple receive antennas provides additional flexibility<br />

in achieving a zero-forcing solution. In fact, multiple zero-forcing approaches<br />

become possible.<br />

In the remainder of this section, we will focus on two scenarios. The first is<br />

TDM with multiple transmit (cochannel) and receive antennas and dispersion. The<br />

second is the MIMO scenario (no dispersion), which is also of interest for both CDM<br />

and OFDM.<br />

3.4.1 Dispersive scenario and TDM<br />

We will continue with the assumptions of the previous section, but introduce multiple<br />

transmit and receive antennas. The model in (3.31) becomes<br />

N, , L-l<br />

r m μ £ V s « 0 Σ ëï )sii) (m -e) + u m , (3.36)<br />

¿,=i (m-¿) ) (3.37)<br />

t=i e=i<br />

which, assuming the previous decisions are correct, can be modeled as<br />

¿=1<br />

Notice that we have assumed that we are detecting all symbols from all transmitters.<br />

Often we are only interested in symbols from one transmitter. The other<br />

transmitters generate interference, which is referred to as cochannel interference.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!