19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38 MATCHED FILTERING<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

8<br />

.C<br />

I<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

- 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3 4<br />

decision variable values<br />

Figure 2.3<br />

BPSK received PDFs.<br />

2.3.3 TDM<br />

With TDM, the channel response for symbol s(m) is h(t — mT). Thus, the decision<br />

variables z(m) are obtained by correlating to<br />

fm(t) = /o(i - mT) = h(t - mT). (2.33)<br />

We can interpret this as matched filtering using filter response g(t) = h*(—r) and<br />

sampling the output every T seconds. Thus, to obtain z(m) for different m, we<br />

filter with a common filter response and sample the result at different times.<br />

2.3.4 Maximum SNR<br />

Does MF maximize output SNR? We will show that it does. Thus, another way<br />

to derive the matched filter is to find the linear receiver filter that maximizes the<br />

output SNR. Also, we saw in the previous section that for MF, error performance<br />

depends directly on the output SNR. This is true in general. Thus, maximizing<br />

output SNR will allow us to minimize bit or symbol error rate.<br />

Consider filtering the complex received signal r(t) to produce the real decision<br />

variable for BPSK symbol s(0), denoted z r . Instead of working with a filter impulse<br />

response and a convolutional integral, it is more convenient to work with a complex

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!