19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192 SIMULATION NOTES<br />

and noise realization. The corresponding received signal is then processed by one<br />

or more equalization methods. The fading coefficients are not time-varying, but<br />

remain constant for the duration of the transmitted signal. The process then repeats<br />

with a different, independent fading realization.<br />

To obtain a representative set of fading realizations within a reasonable simulation<br />

time, the number of transmitted symbols is usually not very large. To achieve<br />

good averaging over symbol and noise realizations, the symbols and noise are also<br />

regenerated with each new fading realization.<br />

The number of fading realizations to generate depends somewhat on the channel<br />

and what aspect of the receiver is being studied. To obtain a good variety of fading<br />

situations, a minimum of 1000 or 2000 fading realizations are recommended. To<br />

obtain good agreement with analytical results, as much as 10,000 realizations may<br />

be needed.<br />

A.2 MATCHED FILTER AND MATCHED FILTER BOUND<br />

Simulating the matched filter is straightforward, as the received signal is convolved<br />

with the time-reversed conjugate of the channel response and sampled at the appropriate<br />

times.<br />

As for the MFB, closed-form analytical expressions can be used (we will label<br />

these REF). One can also simulate the MFB (we will label these (MFB)). One way<br />

is to generate an isolated symbol, surrounded by empty symbol periods. This is<br />

the approach used in Chapter 2. Another way is perfectly subtract ISI from adjacent<br />

symbols before applying MF. This latter approach is useful when simulating<br />

fading channels, so that multiple symbols can be easily simulated for each fading<br />

realization.<br />

Sometimes we want to quantify performance in terms of an output SINR even<br />

though we measure an error rate, such as symbol error rate. This is particularly<br />

true when practical receiver aspects are considered as well as when nonlinear receivers<br />

are used. We can introduce the notion of an effective output SINR (effective<br />

output E s /N{)). We can compute this by measuring error rate and using analytical<br />

relationships between error rate and E s /No to determine the effective E S /NQ.<br />

A.3 SIMULATION CALIBRATION<br />

It is important to calibrate one's simulator with independently generated results.<br />

This was done for linear equalization by generating equivalent results for the channels<br />

considered in [ProOl]. For these results, the linear equalizer uses 31 symbolspaced<br />

taps centered on the first signal path. For consistency, 31 taps are used for<br />

all symbol-spaced LE results in the remainder of this book.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!