19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE MATH 179<br />

8.3.1 Time-invariant channel and training sequence<br />

Consider the case in which the channel does not change with time (at least over the<br />

data burst being demodulated), and we wish to estimate the channel using only a<br />

set of contiguous pilot symbols. If we select received values that only depend on<br />

the training sequence, then we can model a vector of them as<br />

r = Sg + n, (8.12)<br />

where matrix S depends on the training sequence symbols, the path delays, and<br />

possibly the pulse shape, g is a vector of channel coefficients corresponding to<br />

different path delays, and n is noise.<br />

One approach, introduced earlier, is correlation channel estimation, in which<br />

the correlation of the received signal to the training sequence at the path delay of<br />

interest gives an estimate of the channel coefficient. Sometimes the first and last<br />

few symbols of the training sequence are not used, so that the channel estimate is<br />

not influenced by unknown, traffic symbols and the autocorrelation properties can<br />

be made perfect (the channel coefficient of one path is not interfered by the channel<br />

coefficient of another path).<br />

Another common approach is least-squares channel estimation. The idea is to<br />

find the channel coefficients that best predict the received samples corresponding to<br />

the training sequence. Here "best" means that the sum of the magnitude-squares<br />

of the differences between the received samples and the predicted samples is minimized.<br />

The predicted samples correspond to convolving the pilot symbols with the<br />

estimated channel. The result, mathematically, is<br />

g = (S H S)^1S H r. (8.13)<br />

The least-squares approach ensures that different paths don't interfere with one<br />

another, even if the autocorrelation properties of the training sequence are not<br />

perfect.<br />

The least-squares approach is a special case of maximum likelihood channel estimation<br />

in which the noise is assumed to be white. If noise or interference is modeled<br />

as colored noise, then the noise covariance (if known or estimated) can be used to<br />

improve channel estimation.<br />

So far, we have implicitly treated the channel coefficients as unknown, deterministic<br />

(nonrandom) quantities. Alternatively, we can treat them as random quantities<br />

with a certain distribution. A popular approach is MMSE channel estimation,<br />

which requires knowledge of the mean and covariance of the set of channel coefficients,<br />

independent of the distribution of the coefficients. Assuming the channel<br />

coefficients have zero mean and covariance C 9 , the MMSE estimate is given by<br />

g = C 9 S H (SC 9 S" + C Il )- 1 r. (8.14)<br />

If the coefficients are modeled with a Gaussian distribution, then MMSE channel<br />

estimation corresponds to MAP channel estimation. MAP channel estimation is a<br />

more general approach, as it allows for other distributions to be used.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!