19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MORE DETAILS 175<br />

8.2 MORE DETAILS<br />

In this section, we will explore parameter estimation in more detail and examine<br />

radio aspects.<br />

8.2.1 Parameter estimation<br />

In the previous section, we introduced the notion of indirect adaptation, in which<br />

intermediate parameters are estimated and used to compute linear equalization<br />

weights. Another option is to estimate the weights directly, referred to as direct<br />

adaptation. One way to do this is with an adaptive filtering approach that adaptively<br />

learns the best set of weights. An example is the least-mean squares (LMS)<br />

algorithm. Using known or detected symbols, it forms an error signal at symbol<br />

period m given by<br />

em = s m -hHr m + i»i(m)r m _ 1 ], (8.6)<br />

where we've added index m to the weights to show that they change in time. Ideally,<br />

we would like this error to be as small as possible. This can be achieved by updating<br />

the weights for the next symbol period using<br />

w 2 (m+l) = w 2 {m) + ßr m e m (8.7)<br />

wi(m+l) = wi(m)+ / ur rn _ie m . (8.8)<br />

The quantity μ is a step size, which determines how fast we adapt the weights.<br />

When we are tracking rapid changes, we want μ to be large. When the error is<br />

mostly due to noise, we want μ to be small, to minimize changing the weights from<br />

their optimum values.<br />

Returning to indirect adaptation, there are actually two types. Consider again<br />

MMSE LE. Recall that the weights can be obtained by solving a set of equations<br />

Rw = h, where R can be interpreted as a data correlation matrix. With parametric<br />

estimation of R, we estimate the channel response and noise power and use them<br />

to form a data correlation matrix. The term parametric is used because we form<br />

the data correlation values using a parametric model of the received samples and<br />

estimate its parameters.<br />

Another option is to estimate R directly form the received samples. For example,<br />

E{rir 2 } « (1/4)(Γ!Γ 2 + r 2 r 3 + r 3 r 4 + r 4 r 5 ). (8.9)<br />

This approach is also indirect adaptation, but it is nonparametric in the sense that<br />

we do not need a model of the received samples to determine the data correlation<br />

values.<br />

Parametric and nonparametric approaches also exist for channel estimation. In<br />

general, particular tracking approaches are based on a model of the channel coefficient's<br />

behavior over time.<br />

The overall set of design choices for adaptive MMSE LE is summarized in Figure<br />

8.1. Note that the channel response h can also be computed using a parametric or<br />

nonparametric approach.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!