19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE LITERATURE 145<br />

EDGE is an evolution of GSM that provides higher data rates through 8-PSK<br />

and partial response signaling. To maintain reasonable complexity, reduced state<br />

forms of MLSD (RSSE and DFSE) along with channel shortening prefiltering have<br />

been developed for EDGE [AriOOa, SchOl, Dha02, Ger02a].<br />

MLSD is also an option for the second-generation (2G) cellular system known as<br />

US TDMA (see Chapter 5). The symbol rate is 24.3 kbaud, giving a large symbol<br />

period (41.2 //s) relative to typical delay spreads. It is reasonable to address ISI<br />

from at least one previous symbol, giving rise to at least a 4-state Viterbi algorithm.<br />

In [Cho96], use of 4 and 16 states are considered, and 16 states is found useful with<br />

symbol-spaced MLSD when there are two T/2-spaced paths and sampling is aligned<br />

with the first path. In [Jam97], fractionally spaced MLSD is considered using a 4-<br />

state Viterbi algorithm. In [SunOO], 4-state MLSD is only used when needed. Joint<br />

detection of cochannel interference is considered in [Haf04].<br />

6.6 THE LITERATURE<br />

MLSD and ML state detection were proposed in [Chan66]. We saw that MF gives<br />

sufficient statistics for MLSD, leading to the Ungerboeck form [Ung74]. Using a<br />

WMF leads to the Forney form [For72]. The two have been shown to be mathematically<br />

equivalent [Bot98]. An early history of MLSD can be found in [Bel79].<br />

Other front ends include a brick-wall bandlimited filter [Vac81] and a zero-forcing<br />

linear equalizer [Bar89]. In general, all MLSD receivers with access to the same<br />

data should be equivalent [Bar89].<br />

With multiple receive antennas, the Ungerboeck metric has the same form, except<br />

now there is a multichannel matched filter [Mod86]. The Forney metric becomes<br />

the sum of metrics from different antennas, sometimes called metric combining.<br />

When cochannel interference is modeled as spatially colored noise, the term<br />

interference rejection combining (IRC) is sometimes used [Bot99]. Multichannel<br />

MLSD has been applied to underwater acoustic channels [Sto93].<br />

Treating cochannel interference as noise (suppressed linearly) can also be used<br />

with DFSE [AriOOa]. In [Che94], ISI due to partial response signaling is handled<br />

with MLSD whereas ISI due to time dispersion is handled with DFE. In the GSM<br />

system, cochannel interference can be treated as improper or noncircular noise in<br />

formulating an MLSD solution [Hoe06].<br />

Extension of MLSD to time-varying channels can be found in [Bot98, Har97[.<br />

The Ungerboeck form requires channel prediction, motivating a partial Ungerboeck<br />

form that avoids this [Bot98].<br />

MLSD decision can be made on some symbols based on thresholding [OdlOO].<br />

This property can be integrated into the Viterbi algorithm to reduce the number<br />

of states at a particular iteration without loss of performance [Luo07[.<br />

Early work on MLSD for joint detection of multiple signals can be found in<br />

work on crosstalk in wireline communications [Ett76] and CDMA [Sch79, Ver86[.<br />

MLSD has been considered for joint detection of cochannel interference in TDMA<br />

[Wal95, MÍ195, Gra98] systems as well as in underwater acoustic communications<br />

[Sto96j. It has been combined with multiple receive antennas in [Mil95[.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!