19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

110 MMSE AND ML DECISION FEEDBACK EQUALIZATION<br />

5.4.5 Group decision feedback equalization<br />

As with linear equalization, group DFE is possible. The approach is similar, except<br />

that the ISI from groups already detected is subtracted rather than suppressed<br />

linearly.<br />

5.5 AN EXAMPLE<br />

US TDMA is sometimes used to refer to the second generation (2G) cellular system<br />

also known as IS-54, IS-136, American Digital Cellular (ADC), or digital AMPS<br />

(D-AMPS) [Rai91, Goo91]. The modulation is π/4-shift Differential Quadrature<br />

Phase Shift Keying (DQPSK)(2 bits per symbol), and root-Nyquist pulse shaping<br />

is employed. The symbol rate is 24.3 kbaud, giving a large symbol period (41.2 μβ)<br />

relative to typical delay spreads. In [Pro91] a variety of equalization approaches<br />

are reviewed, and a DFE design is developed. DFE with multiple receive antennas<br />

is considered in [Li99].<br />

Because of the long symbol period, path delays are on the order of a fraction of<br />

a symbol period. Because of the ringing of the pulse shape, this causes ISI between<br />

both future and past symbols. Fortunately the pulse shape ringing dies out quickly,<br />

so that a DFE with a small number of forward filter and feedback filter taps makes<br />

sense.<br />

If the receiver is not in motion, the decision error rate at typical SNR operating<br />

levels is low enough that error propagation is not severe. However, if the receiver<br />

is moving quickly (in a vehicle), the fading can change rapidly within a burst of<br />

data. Such fading can cause decision errors which then propagate. Bidirectional<br />

equalization techniques have been developed to address this issue [Ari92, Nag95,<br />

Hig89]. Another option, maximum likelihood sequence detection, is discussed in<br />

the next chapter.<br />

5.6 THE LITERATURE<br />

Early work on DFE can be found in [Aus67]. An early survey of the DFE literature<br />

is given in [Bel79]. In [Sme97] it is shown that with the perfect decision<br />

feedback assumption, the FFF and FBF filters can be optimized separately. While<br />

we have focused on ZF and MMSE designs for the FF, a WMF design can also be<br />

used [Cio95]. DFE with multiple receive antennas is explored in [Mon71, Mon84],<br />

considering self-interference as well as cochannel interference.<br />

DFE works well when the channel is minimum phase. Roughly speaking, this<br />

means that the energy is concentrated in the earlier arriving path delays. Thus,<br />

for a two-path channel, the channel is minimum phase when the first tap is larger.<br />

When the channel is minimum phase, the FF collects more of the signal energy.<br />

If the channel is or might be nonminimum phase, there are several solutions.<br />

One solution is bidirectional equalization, in which the received signal samples are<br />

equalized forward in time, backward in time, or both. Equalization is performed<br />

either forward or backward, depending on an MSE measure after training [Ari92]<br />

or after equalizing a little bit of the data [Nag95]. According to [Nag95], equalizing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!