mohatta2015.pdf
signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view
signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
XVII<br />
6.4 Traveling salesperson problem. 120<br />
6.5 Traveling salesperson tree search. 121<br />
6.6 Traveling salesperson trellis. 122<br />
6.7 MLSD trellis diagram, two-path channel. 123<br />
6.8 MLSD trellis diagram, three-path channel. 123<br />
6.9 Viterbi algorithm flow diagram. 126<br />
6.10 BER vs. Eb/N 0 for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />
rolloff), static, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />
path strengths 0 and —1 dB, and path angles 0 and 90 degrees,<br />
single feedback tap. 132<br />
6.11 BER vs. Eb/No for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />
rolloff), static, two-tap, half-symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />
path strengths 0 and —1 dB, and path angles 0 and 90 degrees, 3<br />
feedback taps. 133<br />
6.12 BER vs. Eb/No for 16-QAM, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping<br />
(0.22 rolloff), static, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with<br />
relative path strengths 0 and —1 dB, and path angles 0 and 90<br />
degrees, single feedback tap. 134<br />
6.13 BER vs. Eb/No for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />
rolloff), fading, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />
path strengths 0 and —1 dB. 135<br />
6.14 BER vs. Eb/No for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />
rolloff), fading, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />
path strengths 0 and —1 dB, target-C power control. 136<br />
6.15 Cumulative distribution function of effective SINR for QPSK,<br />
root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22 rolloff), fading, two-tap,<br />
symbol-spaced channel, with relative path strengths 0 and —1<br />
dB, at 6 dB average received Eb/No. 138<br />
6.16 Cumulative distribution function of effective SINR for QPSK,<br />
root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22 rolloff), fading, two-tap,<br />
symbol-spaced channel, with relative path strengths 0 and —1<br />
dB, at 6 dB target received Eb/No with ideal target-C power<br />
control. 139<br />
6.17 Scatter plot of MMSE DFE effective SINR vs. MMSE LE<br />
effective SINR for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />
rolloff), fading, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />
path strengths 0 and —1 dB, 6 dB average received Eb/No- 140