19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

XVII<br />

6.4 Traveling salesperson problem. 120<br />

6.5 Traveling salesperson tree search. 121<br />

6.6 Traveling salesperson trellis. 122<br />

6.7 MLSD trellis diagram, two-path channel. 123<br />

6.8 MLSD trellis diagram, three-path channel. 123<br />

6.9 Viterbi algorithm flow diagram. 126<br />

6.10 BER vs. Eb/N 0 for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />

rolloff), static, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />

path strengths 0 and —1 dB, and path angles 0 and 90 degrees,<br />

single feedback tap. 132<br />

6.11 BER vs. Eb/No for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />

rolloff), static, two-tap, half-symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />

path strengths 0 and —1 dB, and path angles 0 and 90 degrees, 3<br />

feedback taps. 133<br />

6.12 BER vs. Eb/No for 16-QAM, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping<br />

(0.22 rolloff), static, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with<br />

relative path strengths 0 and —1 dB, and path angles 0 and 90<br />

degrees, single feedback tap. 134<br />

6.13 BER vs. Eb/No for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />

rolloff), fading, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />

path strengths 0 and —1 dB. 135<br />

6.14 BER vs. Eb/No for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />

rolloff), fading, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />

path strengths 0 and —1 dB, target-C power control. 136<br />

6.15 Cumulative distribution function of effective SINR for QPSK,<br />

root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22 rolloff), fading, two-tap,<br />

symbol-spaced channel, with relative path strengths 0 and —1<br />

dB, at 6 dB average received Eb/No. 138<br />

6.16 Cumulative distribution function of effective SINR for QPSK,<br />

root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22 rolloff), fading, two-tap,<br />

symbol-spaced channel, with relative path strengths 0 and —1<br />

dB, at 6 dB target received Eb/No with ideal target-C power<br />

control. 139<br />

6.17 Scatter plot of MMSE DFE effective SINR vs. MMSE LE<br />

effective SINR for QPSK, root-raised-cosine pulse shaping (0.22<br />

rolloff), fading, two-tap, symbol-spaced channel, with relative<br />

path strengths 0 and —1 dB, 6 dB average received Eb/No- 140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!