19.11.2014 Views

mohatta2015.pdf

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92 LINEAR EQUALIZATION<br />

sense that its distribution depends on where you sample (aligned with a symbol vs.<br />

inbetween two symbols). The interference is actually cyclostationary, in that the<br />

distribution changes periodically over time (it is the same at times t and t + T).<br />

It is possible to consider simpler models, particularly for symbols from transmitters<br />

that aren't transmitting symbols of interest. These models include the<br />

following.<br />

White, stationary noise. Interference is folded into the AWGN term, increasing<br />

the value of No. If this is applied to all ISI, we end up with matched filtering.<br />

Colored, stationary noise. This model captures the fact that interference samples<br />

are correlated in time, due to the bandlimited symbol waveform and the<br />

medium response. If only the effect of the symbol waveform is modeled, the<br />

difference between this model and the white noise model is typically small.<br />

However, if the medium response is accounted for and the medium response is<br />

highly dispersive, then the model can be significantly different from the white<br />

noise model. In essence, we are replacing the sequence of Gaussian interfering<br />

symbols with a white, stationary Gaussian noise. The symbol waveform and<br />

medium color that noise.<br />

4.4.7 Block and sub-block forms<br />

So far, we have assumed we will detect symbols one at a time. At the other extreme,<br />

we can detect a whole block of symbols all at once. Such an approach is called block<br />

equalization. There is also something inbetween, in which we detect a sub-block<br />

of symbols. The sub-block corresponds to the symbols taken from certain symbol<br />

periods, certain PMCs, and certain transmit antennas. For example, they could<br />

correspond to all symbols within a certain symbol period.<br />

With both block and sub-block equalization, the received signal vectors to be<br />

processed can be stacked into a vector r which can be modeled using (1.54), i.e.,<br />

r \= HAs + n, (4.132)<br />

where n is a vector of zero-mean, complex r.v.s with covariance C n . Unlike the<br />

purely MIMO scenario, the symbols in s do not necessarily correspond to symbols<br />

from different transmitters during the same symbol period. We would like H to<br />

have more rows than columns, so symbols at the edge of the sub-block may be<br />

folded into n.<br />

To achieve pure zero-forcing, we need H to have at least as many rows as there<br />

are columns. The decision variable vector is given by<br />

z = (ΑΗ Η ΗΑ)ΆΗ Η Γ. (4.133)<br />

Notice we need AH ff HA to be full rank. Observe that if H is square and full rank,<br />

then (4.133) simplifies to<br />

z = A _1 H _1 r. (4.134)<br />

The solution in (4.133) has several interpretations. One is that it is a leastsquares<br />

estimate of s, in that it minimizes the sum of the squares of the difference

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!