mohatta2015.pdf
signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view
signal processing from power amplifier operation control point of view
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92 LINEAR EQUALIZATION<br />
sense that its distribution depends on where you sample (aligned with a symbol vs.<br />
inbetween two symbols). The interference is actually cyclostationary, in that the<br />
distribution changes periodically over time (it is the same at times t and t + T).<br />
It is possible to consider simpler models, particularly for symbols from transmitters<br />
that aren't transmitting symbols of interest. These models include the<br />
following.<br />
White, stationary noise. Interference is folded into the AWGN term, increasing<br />
the value of No. If this is applied to all ISI, we end up with matched filtering.<br />
Colored, stationary noise. This model captures the fact that interference samples<br />
are correlated in time, due to the bandlimited symbol waveform and the<br />
medium response. If only the effect of the symbol waveform is modeled, the<br />
difference between this model and the white noise model is typically small.<br />
However, if the medium response is accounted for and the medium response is<br />
highly dispersive, then the model can be significantly different from the white<br />
noise model. In essence, we are replacing the sequence of Gaussian interfering<br />
symbols with a white, stationary Gaussian noise. The symbol waveform and<br />
medium color that noise.<br />
4.4.7 Block and sub-block forms<br />
So far, we have assumed we will detect symbols one at a time. At the other extreme,<br />
we can detect a whole block of symbols all at once. Such an approach is called block<br />
equalization. There is also something inbetween, in which we detect a sub-block<br />
of symbols. The sub-block corresponds to the symbols taken from certain symbol<br />
periods, certain PMCs, and certain transmit antennas. For example, they could<br />
correspond to all symbols within a certain symbol period.<br />
With both block and sub-block equalization, the received signal vectors to be<br />
processed can be stacked into a vector r which can be modeled using (1.54), i.e.,<br />
r \= HAs + n, (4.132)<br />
where n is a vector of zero-mean, complex r.v.s with covariance C n . Unlike the<br />
purely MIMO scenario, the symbols in s do not necessarily correspond to symbols<br />
from different transmitters during the same symbol period. We would like H to<br />
have more rows than columns, so symbols at the edge of the sub-block may be<br />
folded into n.<br />
To achieve pure zero-forcing, we need H to have at least as many rows as there<br />
are columns. The decision variable vector is given by<br />
z = (ΑΗ Η ΗΑ)ΆΗ Η Γ. (4.133)<br />
Notice we need AH ff HA to be full rank. Observe that if H is square and full rank,<br />
then (4.133) simplifies to<br />
z = A _1 H _1 r. (4.134)<br />
The solution in (4.133) has several interpretations. One is that it is a leastsquares<br />
estimate of s, in that it minimizes the sum of the squares of the difference