L. Fituni, I. Abramova Resource Potential of Africa and Russia's ...
L. Fituni, I. Abramova Resource Potential of Africa and Russia's ... L. Fituni, I. Abramova Resource Potential of Africa and Russia's ...
100,000 students from almost every state in Africa have attended Chinese universities. The number of governmental scholarships has doubled between 2006 and 2009 to come to 4,000 students. In 2009 alone, over 12,000 African students were studying in China. Contacts and cooperation between the governments in such fields as culture, education, science and technology and tourism have also been expanded, providing intellectual motivation and cultural support for China-Africa cooperation 52 ; – generating revenues/hard currency and opening new markets for rival’s products. The general conclusion that stems from this analysis is that the competition between the “old” and “new” actors on the African economic playground will increase in the coming decades. The rivalry will primarily develop and intensify in the primary commodities sector. Gradually, this sector will be saturated and the external players will turn to other sectors, sub-sectors, branches and industries. This cooperation in the value-added sectors will be used as a bargaining tool to achieve better terms of access to the much desired natural resources and raw materials. In the New Millennium, Russia is neither a totally “new”, nor an “old” player on the African continent. The old Soviet heritage, especially in the sphere of political support and sometimes unparalleled altruism, staunch anti-colonial stance and massive assistance in 1960s–1970s to the creation of national economies form a very positive environment for a possible reactivation of the nation’s positions on the continent and bilateral relations with African countries. This opens for the Russian Federation a unique window of opportunity in the next ten to twelve years. On the other hand obvious stumbling blocks like the reduced economic potential, domestic problems, opportunism and profit-seeking of the bureaucracies may prove to become unsurpassable and would not allow the country to occupy a worthy place among the Africa’s privileged partners. The existing threats and challenges can be successfully tackled only by exercising a strategy, bases on a well elaborated system of measures and steps, which rely on three pillars: 1) Genuine mutually beneficial interaction; 55
2) Elaborate use of the still existing and reviving of forgotten gains and achievements of the Soviet-African cooperation; 3) Concentration on the areas of cooperation that would speed up and steady the pace of development in Africa, on the one hand, and boost the Russia’s modernization efforts, on the other. The joint cooperative work in the sphere of utilization of natural resources of both Africa and Russia, coordination of activity on the commodities markets may become the link, that will allow to pull out the whole chain of progress, development and prosperity. 1 International Energy Outlook 2008, September 2008, U.S. Department of Energy. DOE/EIA-0484(2008). Washington, 2008. P. 1. 2 The Strategic Competition for the Continent of Africa. US 110th Congress, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Washington, 2007. 3 Commission Of The European Communities Brussels, Sec (2008) 2741 The Raw Materials Initiative – Meeting Our Critical Needs For Growth And Jobs In Europe. COM(2008) 699 Brussels. 2008. P. 17. 4 Annex V to the Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. EU. Enterprise and Industry Commission. 2010. P. 4. 5 U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2010 Wash., DC. P. 42. 6 Annex V to the Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. EU. Enterprise and Industry Commission. 2010. P. 39. 7 U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2010 Wash., DC. P. 47. 8 U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, 2011 Wash., DC. P. 101. 9 U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2011 Wash., DC. P. 101. 10 Annex V to the Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. EU. Enterprise and Industry Commission. 2010. P. 121. 11 U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2010 Wash., DC. P. 99. 12 Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend: World Mining Data 2010. L. Weber, G. Zsak, C. Reichl, M. Schatz. Vienna, 2010. 13 British Geological Survey: European Mineral Statistics 2004-2008. 14 Annex V to the Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. EU. Enterprise and Industry Commission. 2010. P. 4. 56
- Page 6 and 7: INTRODUCTION IN THE GLOBALIZED WORL
- Page 8 and 9: At certain stages of their history,
- Page 10 and 11: tives. The authors are not describi
- Page 12 and 13: cations, including monographs 1 and
- Page 14 and 15: arena by the loftiest goals and ide
- Page 16 and 17: quence, their role in the world eco
- Page 18 and 19: thus the last seller of the commodi
- Page 20 and 21: Table 1.1.2. World chromium product
- Page 22 and 23: Table 1.1.3. World cobalt productio
- Page 24 and 25: shore in many parts of the world. L
- Page 26 and 27: Though US totally depends on import
- Page 28 and 29: isk of supply shortage in the next
- Page 30 and 31: long been obsolete, do exist and te
- Page 32 and 33: a European-African energy forum; th
- Page 34 and 35: upon the same ideology: the new roa
- Page 36 and 37: Force. At the request of the UN Sec
- Page 38 and 39: - The United States has sole jurisd
- Page 40 and 41: uses to track terrorists. Algerian
- Page 42 and 43: sum, in exchange for terminating th
- Page 44 and 45: UK, Greece, Italy and Spain during
- Page 46 and 47: ing Angola’s large oil resources
- Page 48 and 49: China concluded two major M&A deals
- Page 50 and 51: the continent. To help African coun
- Page 52 and 53: egy with regard to Sudan and Zimbab
- Page 54 and 55: some price-related difficulties for
- Page 58 and 59: 15 U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 2 Natural Resource Potentia
- Page 62 and 63: tion in the global division of labo
- Page 64 and 65: of other nations (manifest in an ex
- Page 66 and 67: The mineral resource base (MRB) of
- Page 68 and 69: In Nigeria, the smelter at Ikot Aba
- Page 70 and 71: ite production at Komi to reach 6.5
- Page 72 and 73: depletion. In South Africa, output
- Page 74 and 75: 25-26 thousand tons of copper conce
- Page 76 and 77: Country 75 Cost Ranges Namibia 0 20
- Page 78 and 79: The Elkon district, Southern Yakuti
- Page 80 and 81: ites and Miocene sediments extendin
- Page 82 and 83: South, Etango and Valencia alaskite
- Page 84 and 85: of competitiveness by similar produ
- Page 86 and 87: tive scenario, the above goals will
- Page 88 and 89: The concept of resource efficiency
- Page 90 and 91: vately owned. The leading enterpris
- Page 92 and 93: In this respect African and Russian
- Page 94 and 95: Table 2.2.2. Distribution of capita
- Page 96 and 97: will allow the project to overcome
- Page 98 and 99: World prices on all types of minera
- Page 100 and 101: 2.3. Competitors or Partners? Russi
- Page 102 and 103: Soviet organizations supplied Alger
- Page 104 and 105: that the gas crisis between Russia
100,000 students from almost every state in <strong>Africa</strong> have attended<br />
Chinese universities. The number <strong>of</strong> governmental scholarships has<br />
doubled between 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2009 to come to 4,000 students. In 2009<br />
alone, over 12,000 <strong>Africa</strong>n students were studying in China. Contacts<br />
<strong>and</strong> cooperation between the governments in such fields as culture,<br />
education, science <strong>and</strong> technology <strong>and</strong> tourism have also been<br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed, providing intellectual motivation <strong>and</strong> cultural support for<br />
China-<strong>Africa</strong> cooperation 52 ;<br />
– generating revenues/hard currency <strong>and</strong> opening new markets<br />
for rival’s products.<br />
The general conclusion that stems from this analysis is that the<br />
competition between the “old” <strong>and</strong> “new” actors on the <strong>Africa</strong>n economic<br />
playground will increase in the coming decades. The rivalry<br />
will primarily develop <strong>and</strong> intensify in the primary commodities<br />
sector. Gradually, this sector will be saturated <strong>and</strong> the external players<br />
will turn to other sectors, sub-sectors, branches <strong>and</strong> industries.<br />
This cooperation in the value-added sectors will be used as a bargaining<br />
tool to achieve better terms <strong>of</strong> access to the much desired<br />
natural resources <strong>and</strong> raw materials.<br />
In the New Millennium, Russia is neither a totally “new”, nor an<br />
“old” player on the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent. The old Soviet heritage, especially<br />
in the sphere <strong>of</strong> political support <strong>and</strong> sometimes unparalleled<br />
altruism, staunch anti-colonial stance <strong>and</strong> massive assistance in<br />
1960s–1970s to the creation <strong>of</strong> national economies form a very positive<br />
environment for a possible reactivation <strong>of</strong> the nation’s positions<br />
on the continent <strong>and</strong> bilateral relations with <strong>Africa</strong>n countries. This<br />
opens for the Russian Federation a unique window <strong>of</strong> opportunity in<br />
the next ten to twelve years. On the other h<strong>and</strong> obvious stumbling<br />
blocks like the reduced economic potential, domestic problems, opportunism<br />
<strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it-seeking <strong>of</strong> the bureaucracies may prove to become<br />
unsurpassable <strong>and</strong> would not allow the country to occupy a<br />
worthy place among the <strong>Africa</strong>’s privileged partners.<br />
The existing threats <strong>and</strong> challenges can be successfully tackled<br />
only by exercising a strategy, bases on a well elaborated system <strong>of</strong><br />
measures <strong>and</strong> steps, which rely on three pillars:<br />
1) Genuine mutually beneficial interaction;<br />
55