L. Fituni, I. Abramova Resource Potential of Africa and Russia's ...
L. Fituni, I. Abramova Resource Potential of Africa and Russia's ... L. Fituni, I. Abramova Resource Potential of Africa and Russia's ...
interpretations is the intensifying global rivalry for access to the shrinking reserves of natural resources a considerable proportion of which are in Russia and Africa. The paramount character of the existing conditions and tendencies objectively strengthen the positions of Africa and Russia, while both tend to increasingly take similar stands on major global issues. As a consequence, their roles in the world economy, as the lead players on the global market of natural resources is growing steadily. This may lead, on the one hand, to multi-vector confrontation or at least tensions with other global centers of power, but on the other, opens ways for consolidation of positions, and for maneuvering between them, while actively perusing national tasks and goals. Those, who erroneously hope that the global development will continue along the blueprints of the 20th century, believe that their confrontational and hegemonic approach can prevent the world from changing. They tend to underestimate the urge of peoples for a happier and more prosperous life and freedom, that can not be stopped. Disproportions in the consumption of global resources become a threat to the stability of the world economy. The centuries old patterns of distribution of commodities for manufacturing needs come into contradiction with the interests of the greater part of the population of the planet. This contradiction lies in the heart of the continued economic crises. Unfortunately, the West continues to see both Russia and Africa as passive objects of its policy and to exploit their resources. It is suspicious and negative towards all attempts by these countries to conduct independent policy with regard to resources in their own interests. It interprets as an attempt to form anti-West geopolitical alliances the resuming by Russia of economic ties with African states in the use of natural resources and the possibility to coordinate their resources-related policy. In recent years, it became increasingly evident, that no matter how much western leaders speak about resetting the relationships or reforming the world economic order, their strategic vision is still significantly dominated by the old Cold War stereotypes and zero-sum games. 209
This inevitably motivates the United States and the "united Europe" to prevent a deeper cooperation between Russia and Africa in the field of resources. At the same time, one should not reduce the complex global raw-materials policy to attempts to keep Russia out of Africa or exclude it from Africa. As seen by Russia and Africa, the problem is whether the competitors recognize as legitimate their right to have their own national interests in the area of raw-materials and protect them. The abrupt change in the situation in world raw materials markets that occurred in 2008 as a consequence of the current monetary crisis is bound to affect the future of the economic situation of African countries. Should the post-effects of the current financial crisis prove protracted (this is the most likely scenario), they would have fewer opportunities to sell their manufactured goods and buy raw materials in Africa. We should keep in mind that monetary crises follow a certain cycle: they arise, grow, reach the peak and peter out sooner of later. At the same time, global shortages of raw materials are long-term and systemic. Hence the problems will be growing and causing a tougher competition for Africa's raw materials. Thus, the new tussle for Africa's resources is of a strategic nature and is going to be protracted. Most probably and despite their desperate resistance, the old players would have to surrender some of their economic positions on the continent to new rivals. We are almost certain that, at least during the next decade, the positions of China, India, Russia, Brazil and a number of other countries in Africa will be growing stronger. Concurrently, there will be a growing competition between the old players – above all between the USA and EU countries – to once again confirm that the concept of a unipolar world is untenable and show that many "economic poles" are trying to grab African resources to advance their own interests. As for Russia, it ought to assess the actual advantages of cooperation with Africa in the field of raw materials and to re-embark the once successful course of multifaceted and mutually beneficial cooperation with the continent, to whose freedom from colonialism Moscow has contributed so much.
- Page 160 and 161: of Su-30MKA fighters. At the same t
- Page 162 and 163: etc. He also remarked that since th
- Page 164 and 165: However, there are harbingers of a
- Page 166 and 167: There was a good demand in Egypt fo
- Page 168 and 169: Another promising sphere for Russia
- Page 170 and 171: Lada users in Egypt. In 2010, a new
- Page 172 and 173: All these companies have permanent
- Page 174 and 175: ment of the Russian Federation 105
- Page 176 and 177: As of mid 2010, other areas of econ
- Page 178 and 179: cooperation and hydrocarbon product
- Page 180 and 181: tion." The participants in the Raba
- Page 182 and 183: 2009 consisted of such traditional
- Page 184 and 185: From October 21-23, 2010, the Fourt
- Page 186 and 187: (May 2009), and Ugandan President Y
- Page 188 and 189: Russia provided humanitarian aid to
- Page 190 and 191: Nigeria’s Share in Russia’s Imp
- Page 192 and 193: supplies only it is either a blatan
- Page 194 and 195: On the initiative of the Ethiopian
- Page 196 and 197: - Automotive and components - Capit
- Page 198 and 199: led by the two Chambers and attende
- Page 200 and 201: coal mixture of a new generation. T
- Page 202 and 203: cial architecture and food safety a
- Page 204 and 205: The talks in Luanda led the two cou
- Page 206 and 207: 9 Annual Report of Alexander Saltan
- Page 208 and 209: CONCLUSIONS THE RESULTS OF THE UNDE
- Page 212: Leonid FITUNI and Irina ABRAMOVA RE
interpretations is the intensifying global rivalry for access to the<br />
shrinking reserves <strong>of</strong> natural resources a considerable proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
which are in Russia <strong>and</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />
The paramount character <strong>of</strong> the existing conditions <strong>and</strong> tendencies<br />
objectively strengthen the positions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>and</strong> Russia,<br />
while both tend to increasingly take similar st<strong>and</strong>s on major global<br />
issues. As a consequence, their roles in the world economy, as the<br />
lead players on the global market <strong>of</strong> natural resources is growing<br />
steadily. This may lead, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, to multi-vector confrontation<br />
or at least tensions with other global centers <strong>of</strong> power, but<br />
on the other, opens ways for consolidation <strong>of</strong> positions, <strong>and</strong> for<br />
maneuvering between them, while actively perusing national tasks<br />
<strong>and</strong> goals.<br />
Those, who erroneously hope that the global development will<br />
continue along the blueprints <strong>of</strong> the 20th century, believe that their<br />
confrontational <strong>and</strong> hegemonic approach can prevent the world from<br />
changing. They tend to underestimate the urge <strong>of</strong> peoples for a happier<br />
<strong>and</strong> more prosperous life <strong>and</strong> freedom, that can not be stopped.<br />
Disproportions in the consumption <strong>of</strong> global resources become a<br />
threat to the stability <strong>of</strong> the world economy. The centuries old patterns<br />
<strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> commodities for manufacturing needs come<br />
into contradiction with the interests <strong>of</strong> the greater part <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
<strong>of</strong> the planet. This contradiction lies in the heart <strong>of</strong> the continued<br />
economic crises.<br />
Unfortunately, the West continues to see both Russia <strong>and</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />
as passive objects <strong>of</strong> its policy <strong>and</strong> to exploit their resources. It is<br />
suspicious <strong>and</strong> negative towards all attempts by these countries to<br />
conduct independent policy with regard to resources in their own<br />
interests. It interprets as an attempt to form anti-West geopolitical<br />
alliances the resuming by Russia <strong>of</strong> economic ties with <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />
states in the use <strong>of</strong> natural resources <strong>and</strong> the possibility to coordinate<br />
their resources-related policy. In recent years, it became increasingly<br />
evident, that no matter how much western leaders speak about resetting<br />
the relationships or reforming the world economic order, their<br />
strategic vision is still significantly dominated by the old Cold War<br />
stereotypes <strong>and</strong> zero-sum games.<br />
209