19.11.2014 Views

need to know / leases - project update - BDO International

need to know / leases - project update - BDO International

need to know / leases - project update - BDO International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LEASES - A PROJECT UPDATE<br />

5<br />

THE IASB/FASB PROJECT TO DATE<br />

In order <strong>to</strong> address the criticisms set out above, the IASB and the FASB (the Boards) initiated a joint <strong>project</strong> <strong>to</strong> develop a<br />

new approach <strong>to</strong> lease accounting that would result in most, if not all, assets and liabilities arising from lease contracts<br />

being recognised in an entity’s statement of financial position. While the main focus was on lessee accounting, proposals<br />

were also developed for changes <strong>to</strong> lessor accounting. An exposure draft (the ED) was issued in August 2010 which set out<br />

an accounting approach based on the premise that lease contracts result in lessees obtaining the right <strong>to</strong> use an asset for a<br />

specified period (the ‘right of use’ model). The proposals were controversial, and the Boards received almost 800 comment<br />

letters.<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> publishing the ED for comment, the Boards:<br />

––<br />

Initiated over 200 outreach meetings, including 7 round tables and 15 preparer workshops<br />

––<br />

Prepared questionnaires that were completed by over 250 lessors and over 400 lessees<br />

––<br />

Carried out targeted outreach during redeliberations with over 70 organisations.<br />

There was general support for the proposed ‘right of use’ model. However, the feedback received also included many<br />

comments that the detailed approach proposed in the ED was <strong>to</strong>o complex, inconsistent with the economics underlying<br />

certain transactions and, for many companies, excessively costly <strong>to</strong> implement. In particular, there were concerns about<br />

complexity of measurement, costs associated with required reassessments during lease terms, accounting for multi element<br />

contracts (contracts which contain lease and non-lease components) and the proposed lessor accounting model. During<br />

their redeliberations, the Boards have made significant changes <strong>to</strong> the proposals set out in the ED. Consequently, as noted<br />

above, the proposals will be re-exposed in order <strong>to</strong> provide interested parties with an opportunity <strong>to</strong> comment on revisions<br />

that the Boards have proposed.<br />

<strong>BDO</strong> comment<br />

The Boards have addressed many of the concerns raised by constituents in response <strong>to</strong> the original proposals, and this has<br />

resulted in simplifications being made <strong>to</strong> the proposed model which would assist in making them more straightforward <strong>to</strong><br />

implement. We welcome these developments. However, the proposals that we expect <strong>to</strong> be re-exposed for comment also<br />

include what some might regard as a compromise for <strong>leases</strong> of real estate. While we believe that the proposals would continue<br />

<strong>to</strong> bring a significant improvement <strong>to</strong> the quality of financial reporting, the extent of this improvement in accounting for <strong>leases</strong><br />

of real estate would be more limited. The revised proposals for lessor accounting are also complex, and we anticipate that there<br />

may be calls for further simplification of the model in responses <strong>to</strong> the revised exposure draft.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!