Drug Utilization Pattern and Co-morbidtities Among ... - IOMC
Drug Utilization Pattern and Co-morbidtities Among ... - IOMC
Drug Utilization Pattern and Co-morbidtities Among ... - IOMC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Review of Global Medicine <strong>and</strong><br />
Healthcare Research<br />
Volume 2 Number 2 (2011)<br />
Publisher: DRUNPP<br />
Managed by: <strong>IOMC</strong> Group<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
Website: www.iomcworld.com/rgmhr/
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Utilization</strong> <strong>Pattern</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Co</strong>-<strong>morbidtities</strong> <strong>Among</strong><br />
Hypertensive Patients in Sub-Urban Hospital, Malaysia<br />
Baig MR 1 , Shih Yuit W 1 , Ramani M 1 , Chia Jin P 1 , Asma M 2 , Tahir MK 3 *<br />
1 Department of Pharmacy, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, 08100, Bedong, Kedah Darul<br />
Aman, Malaysia<br />
2 Chief Pharmacist, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani Malaysia<br />
3<br />
<strong>Co</strong>llege of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Alahsah, Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia<br />
* <strong>Co</strong>rresponding author; Email: tahir.pks@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: To reach an optimum blood pressure level among hypertensive patients,<br />
combinations of two or more antihypertensive drug classes may be needed.<br />
Objective: This study aimed to describe the drug utilisation pattern of anti-hypertensive<br />
agents in sub-urban government hospital, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani,<br />
Malaysia.<br />
Methodology: A cross-sectional retrospective evaluation of prescription was done from 30<br />
March 2009 to 19 June 2009. Data analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for<br />
Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 13.0. The chi-square test was used to determine the<br />
differences between proportions. Odd rations were calculated to identify the groups at higher<br />
risk of co-morbidities.<br />
Results: A total of 500 hypertensive patient’s prescriptions were screened for the study, in<br />
which 288 (57.6%) were males <strong>and</strong> 212 (42.4%) were females. The most common comorbidity<br />
found in these hypertensive patients were cardiac disease (39.8%), followed by<br />
diabetes mellitus (38%) with nephropathy. The male patients were with high risk of comorbidities.<br />
Polytherapy was found to be the most preferred prescribing pattern, 318 (63.6%)<br />
patients were given polytherapy, while 182 (36.4%) patients were given monotherapy. Beta<br />
blocker (BB), 242 times (48.4%) is the highest prescribed drug class followed by angiotensinconverting<br />
enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), 235 times (47.0%); calcium channel blockers (CCB),<br />
218 times (43.6 %); diuretics, 146 times (29.2%); <strong>and</strong> the least prescribed drug is alpha<br />
blockers, 15 times (0.03%). An increase of 42.3% was found in antihypertensive drug<br />
consumption in hospital from 2001 to 2009.<br />
<strong>Co</strong>nclusion: The study shows Polytherapy is the most preferred prescribing pattern for<br />
treating hypertension in Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim when compared to the use of a single<br />
type of antihypertensive drug, monotherapy. The use of beta blockers <strong>and</strong> short-acting<br />
preparations were commonly used both as monotherapy <strong>and</strong> combination treatment. Overall<br />
therapy was not found complaint with the Malaysian guidelines for the management of<br />
hypertension.<br />
Keywords: <strong>Drug</strong> utilisation, Anti-hypertensive agents, Diabetes mellitus, Beta blocker,<br />
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, Malaysian guidelines<br />
Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 139
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>Among</strong> the developed nations like U.S there are more than 70 million adults with confirm<br />
diagnosis of hypertension [1] which latter put an addition burden due to serious adverse<br />
cardiovascular <strong>and</strong> cerebrovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), angina<br />
pectoris, stroke, <strong>and</strong> renal disease [2]. These risks can be avoided by the proper management<br />
of hypertension. <strong>Co</strong>mmonly used anti-hypertensive agents are thiazide-type diuretics such as<br />
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting<br />
enzyme (ACE)–inhibitors, <strong>and</strong> calcium-channel blockers. 3 Mono therapy is more affective at<br />
initial stages however, in most of the case a combination therapy is recommended to control<br />
hypertension [2, 3]. It is seen that in developed countries, only 27% of hypertensive on<br />
treatment had adequate blood pressure control i.e below 140/90 mmHg [4]. The scenario is<br />
worse in developing countries [5]. In Malaysia a review from the Information <strong>and</strong><br />
Documentation System Unit of the Ministry of Health of Malaysia showed that cardiovascular<br />
disease had been the principal cause of death in government hospitals over the years,<br />
accounting for 23% to 26% of deaths from 1994 to 2001. Cardiovascular disease is the major<br />
cause of hospital admissions <strong>and</strong> death in government hospitals in Malaysia. The National<br />
Health <strong>and</strong> Morbidity survey showed 61% of Malaysians had co-morbidity along with<br />
hypertension. The prevalence of hypertension in Malaysians aged 30 years <strong>and</strong> above was<br />
42.6% in 2006 [6]. The choice of anti hypertensive drug class patients is influenced by, many<br />
factors like the presence of multiple co-morbid conditions <strong>and</strong> the possibility or risk of drugdrug<br />
interactions. To reach an optimum blood pressure level in these patients, combinations<br />
of two or more antihypertensive drug classes may be needed. This study aimed to describe the<br />
pattern of use in a sub-urban government hospital, its compliance with guidelines, <strong>and</strong> its<br />
economic impact.<br />
Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 140
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
Methodology<br />
A cross-sectional retrospective evaluation of prescription was done for the patients attended<br />
Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani.<br />
- Study Duration: The study was conducted from 30 March 2009 to 19 June 2009.<br />
- Study Design: A retrospective study was conducted based on the availability of the<br />
prescription forms of the patients with diagnosis of hypertension. A st<strong>and</strong>ard data<br />
collection form was developed <strong>and</strong> validated by a group of a Pharmacist; Medical<br />
Doctor <strong>and</strong> a Professor. The data form was designed in such a way that it collects the<br />
information about the patient’s demographic characteristics <strong>and</strong> drug utilization<br />
pattern, which includes age, gender, race, indication, dosage of commonly prescribed<br />
antihypertensive drugs in the Hospital.<br />
Sampling Method: All the information was collected with the permission of the director <strong>and</strong><br />
the ethical committee of the state with the supervision of the concern Pharmacist. This<br />
research is registered in Clinical Research Centre (CRC) with a government approval.<br />
Sample sizes of 500 prescription forms of patients with hypertension were selected.<br />
<strong>Co</strong>nvenience sampling technique was employed for the selection of patients. Information was<br />
analyses based on data regarding race, age, gender, indications <strong>and</strong> trends in the prescribing of<br />
antihypertensive medications at Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani. Data analysis<br />
was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 13.0.<br />
The chi-square test was used to determine the differences between proportions. Odd rations<br />
were calculated to identify the groups at higher risk of co-morbidities.<br />
Results<br />
A total of 500 patients’ prescription was collected. The patients receiving medications for<br />
antihypertensive agent were 288 (57.6%) males <strong>and</strong> 212 (42.4%) females. The age<br />
Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 141
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
distribution of 500 patients studied shows that the highest number of patients receiving<br />
medication of antihypertensive agent was within the age range of 51-60 years having 166<br />
(33.2%). In terms of race majority of the patients were Malay 298 (59.6%) followed by<br />
Chinese 113 (22.6%) <strong>and</strong> 89 (17.8%) of Indian (Table 1). In most of the case the patients<br />
have other medical complications in addition to hypertension. Majority, 199 (39.8%) were<br />
with cardiac disease like; angina, Myocardial infraction <strong>and</strong> ischemic heart diseases followed<br />
by Diabetes Mellitus patients <strong>and</strong> renal failure. Details are described in Table 1. However, the<br />
prevalence of comorbid diabetes mellitus was significantly higher among Malays than<br />
Chinese <strong>and</strong> Indians (Table 2). In terms of gender, men were more like to be at the risk of<br />
cardiac complications (OR 1.335 [CI 1.153-1.545]) <strong>and</strong> renal failure (OR 1.128 [CI 0.788-<br />
1.616]). While female were found at higher risk of diabetes mellitus (OR 1.114[CI 0.906-<br />
1.369]). About 318(63.6%) patients were on treatment with poly-therapy for hypertension<br />
while rest were treated with mono-therapy. Beta blockers (BB) were the most frequently<br />
prescribed drugs for antihypertensive treatment. Those receiving antihypertensive therapy, the<br />
most frequently prescribed drug types were, metoprolol 161(32.2%); perindopril 154(30.8%);<br />
amlodipine 98(19.6%); atenolol 67(13.4%); frusemide 66(13.2%); captopril 59(11.8%);<br />
vastarel 58(11.6%); felodipine 57(11.4%); chlorthiazide 42(8.4%); nifedipine 40(8.0%); <strong>and</strong><br />
the least are carvedilol, losartan, ramipril, terazosin 2(0.4% each); <strong>and</strong> doxasin 1(0.2%).<br />
Details about the various anti-hypertensive agents used are shown in Table 3.<br />
Discussion<br />
Findings of the current study demonstrate that the most frequently prescribed antihypertensive<br />
drug class were Beta-Blockers (48.4%). In about n=37 cases it is used as a<br />
single therapy however, in n=205 it is used in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.<br />
Unlike the finding of [1] the use of ACEI, CCBs, Diuretics or ARBs was found least in our<br />
study. BB was observed to be most commonly prescribed regimens. These finding are not in<br />
Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 142
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
compliance with the findings of [1]. Moreover, the compliance level to the Malaysian clinical<br />
practice guidelines for the treatment of hypertension was also low, which prefer the use of<br />
ACEI, CCBs, Diuretics or ARBs as first line of therapy. β-blockers are no longer preferred as<br />
compelling evidence showed that they were associated with 16% increase in the risk of stroke<br />
when compared to other agents [6] <strong>and</strong> an excess cardiovascular event risk of 18% in older<br />
patients (>60years) [7] It has also been shown to increase the incidence of new-onset diabetes<br />
compared to other drugs, especially in those with high metabolic risk [8]. They were the least<br />
effective agents in terms of LVH regression [9] <strong>and</strong> reduced central aortic pressure less<br />
effectively [10] than newer antihypertensive agents. β-blockers should only be prescribed<br />
when compelling indications such as heart failure or ischaemic heart disease co exist [11]. In<br />
addition its is also seen that in about 76 (%) diabetic patients, BB were used in combination or<br />
as a single line of therapy. Evidence are there that discourage the use of BB among diabetic<br />
patients which make it difficult to predict signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms of hypoglycemia such as<br />
tremors <strong>and</strong> tachycardia may be absent, making it more difficult for patients to recognize an<br />
oncoming episode. In addition, multiple effects on glucose metabolism have been reported,<br />
usually with the noncardioselective beta-blockers (e.g., propranolol, pindolol, timolol) but<br />
occasionally also with relatively beta-1 selective agents (e.g., metoprolol).<br />
<strong>Co</strong>nclusion<br />
Polytherapy is the most preferred prescribing pattern for treating hypertension in Hospital<br />
Sultan Abdul Halim when compared to the use of a single type of antihypertensive drug,<br />
monotherapy. The use of beta blockers <strong>and</strong> short-acting preparations were commonly used<br />
both as monotherapy <strong>and</strong> combination treatment. Overall therapy was not found complaint<br />
with the Malaysian guidelines for the management of hypertension.<br />
Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 143
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
References<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease <strong>and</strong> stroke statistics—2007 update:<br />
A report from the American Heart Association Statistics <strong>Co</strong>mmittee <strong>and</strong> Stroke Statistics<br />
Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007;115(5):e69–e6171.<br />
2. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh Report of the Joint National<br />
<strong>Co</strong>mmittee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, <strong>and</strong> Treatment of High Blood Pressure:<br />
The JNC 7 Report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–2572.<br />
3. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with<br />
blood pressure lowering drugs: Analysis of 354 r<strong>and</strong>omised trials. BMJ.<br />
2003;326(7404):1427.<br />
4. <strong>Co</strong>lhoun HM, DongW, Poulter NR. Blood pressure screening, management <strong>and</strong> control<br />
in Engl<strong>and</strong>: results from the health survey for Engl<strong>and</strong>. 1994. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 752–<br />
757.<br />
5. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (eds). The Global Burden of Diseases, <strong>Co</strong>mprehensive<br />
Assessment of Mortality <strong>and</strong> Disability From Diseases, Injuries <strong>and</strong> Risk Factors in 1990<br />
Projected to 2020: World Health Organisation. Harvard University Press: USA 1996.<br />
6. Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta-blockers remain first choice in the<br />
treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005;366(9496):1545-53.<br />
40<br />
7. Khan N, McAlister FA. Re-examining the efficacy of beta-blockers for the treatment of<br />
hypertension: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2006;174(12):1737-42.<br />
8. Elliot WJ, Meyer PM. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a<br />
network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369(9557):201-7.<br />
9. Schmieder RE, Martus P, Klinbeil A. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential<br />
hypertension. A meta-analysis of r<strong>and</strong>omized double-blind studies. JAMA.<br />
1996;275(19):1507-13.<br />
10. Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, et al. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering<br />
drugs on central aortic pressure <strong>and</strong> clinical outcomes: principal results of the <strong>Co</strong>nduit<br />
Artery Function Evaluation (CAFÉ) study. Circulation. 2006; 113(9):1213-25.<br />
11. Malaysian Hypertension Guideline Working Group. Clinical Practice Guidelines on<br />
Management of Hypertension. 3rd ed. 2008. MOH/P/PAK/156.08 (GU).<br />
Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 144
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
Table 1: Demographic <strong>and</strong> Medical information of patients<br />
Demographics N= 500 %<br />
Gender<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
288<br />
212<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
57.6<br />
42.4<br />
Age of Patients Range 12-98 Year<br />
Mean age= 57±12.94<br />
Race<br />
11-20<br />
21-30<br />
31-40<br />
41-50<br />
51-60<br />
61-70<br />
71-80<br />
81-90<br />
>90<br />
Malay<br />
Chinese<br />
Indian<br />
2<br />
9<br />
34<br />
90<br />
166<br />
104<br />
80<br />
13<br />
2<br />
298<br />
113<br />
89<br />
0.4<br />
1.8<br />
6.8<br />
18.0<br />
33.2<br />
20.8<br />
16.0<br />
2.6<br />
0.4<br />
59.6<br />
22.6<br />
17.8<br />
<strong>Co</strong>-morbidities<br />
Heart Disease<br />
Diabetes Mellitus<br />
Renal Failure<br />
199<br />
190<br />
17<br />
39.8<br />
38.0<br />
3.4<br />
Number of Patient with one of Multiple Medical<br />
complication<br />
HPT+DM+CD+RD<br />
HPT+DM+CD<br />
HPT+DM+RD<br />
HPT+CD+RD<br />
HPT+DM<br />
HPT+CD<br />
HPT+RD<br />
HPT alone<br />
1<br />
74<br />
5<br />
2<br />
110<br />
122<br />
9<br />
177<br />
0.2<br />
14.8<br />
1<br />
0.4<br />
22<br />
24.4<br />
1.8<br />
35.4<br />
Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 145
REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />
Table 2: Prevalence of co-morbidities as per Age <strong>and</strong> Race of the Patient<br />
ISSN: 1986-5872<br />
Demographics<br />
Age<br />
Race<br />
11-20<br />
21-30<br />
31-40<br />
41-50<br />
51-60<br />
61-70<br />
71-80<br />
81-90<br />
>90<br />
Malay<br />
Chinese<br />
Indian<br />
Diabetes Mellitus<br />
N(190)<br />
0<br />
2(1.1%)<br />
6(3.2%)<br />
34(17.9%)<br />
75 (39.5%)<br />
38 (20.0%)<br />
29 (15.3%)<br />
6(3.2%)<br />
0<br />
X 2 13.581, df=8, p=