19.11.2014 Views

Drug Utilization Pattern and Co-morbidtities Among ... - IOMC

Drug Utilization Pattern and Co-morbidtities Among ... - IOMC

Drug Utilization Pattern and Co-morbidtities Among ... - IOMC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Review of Global Medicine <strong>and</strong><br />

Healthcare Research<br />

Volume 2 Number 2 (2011)<br />

Publisher: DRUNPP<br />

Managed by: <strong>IOMC</strong> Group<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

Website: www.iomcworld.com/rgmhr/


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Utilization</strong> <strong>Pattern</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Co</strong>-<strong>morbidtities</strong> <strong>Among</strong><br />

Hypertensive Patients in Sub-Urban Hospital, Malaysia<br />

Baig MR 1 , Shih Yuit W 1 , Ramani M 1 , Chia Jin P 1 , Asma M 2 , Tahir MK 3 *<br />

1 Department of Pharmacy, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, 08100, Bedong, Kedah Darul<br />

Aman, Malaysia<br />

2 Chief Pharmacist, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani Malaysia<br />

3<br />

<strong>Co</strong>llege of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Alahsah, Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia<br />

* <strong>Co</strong>rresponding author; Email: tahir.pks@gmail.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: To reach an optimum blood pressure level among hypertensive patients,<br />

combinations of two or more antihypertensive drug classes may be needed.<br />

Objective: This study aimed to describe the drug utilisation pattern of anti-hypertensive<br />

agents in sub-urban government hospital, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani,<br />

Malaysia.<br />

Methodology: A cross-sectional retrospective evaluation of prescription was done from 30<br />

March 2009 to 19 June 2009. Data analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for<br />

Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 13.0. The chi-square test was used to determine the<br />

differences between proportions. Odd rations were calculated to identify the groups at higher<br />

risk of co-morbidities.<br />

Results: A total of 500 hypertensive patient’s prescriptions were screened for the study, in<br />

which 288 (57.6%) were males <strong>and</strong> 212 (42.4%) were females. The most common comorbidity<br />

found in these hypertensive patients were cardiac disease (39.8%), followed by<br />

diabetes mellitus (38%) with nephropathy. The male patients were with high risk of comorbidities.<br />

Polytherapy was found to be the most preferred prescribing pattern, 318 (63.6%)<br />

patients were given polytherapy, while 182 (36.4%) patients were given monotherapy. Beta<br />

blocker (BB), 242 times (48.4%) is the highest prescribed drug class followed by angiotensinconverting<br />

enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), 235 times (47.0%); calcium channel blockers (CCB),<br />

218 times (43.6 %); diuretics, 146 times (29.2%); <strong>and</strong> the least prescribed drug is alpha<br />

blockers, 15 times (0.03%). An increase of 42.3% was found in antihypertensive drug<br />

consumption in hospital from 2001 to 2009.<br />

<strong>Co</strong>nclusion: The study shows Polytherapy is the most preferred prescribing pattern for<br />

treating hypertension in Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim when compared to the use of a single<br />

type of antihypertensive drug, monotherapy. The use of beta blockers <strong>and</strong> short-acting<br />

preparations were commonly used both as monotherapy <strong>and</strong> combination treatment. Overall<br />

therapy was not found complaint with the Malaysian guidelines for the management of<br />

hypertension.<br />

Keywords: <strong>Drug</strong> utilisation, Anti-hypertensive agents, Diabetes mellitus, Beta blocker,<br />

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, Malaysian guidelines<br />

Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 139


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Among</strong> the developed nations like U.S there are more than 70 million adults with confirm<br />

diagnosis of hypertension [1] which latter put an addition burden due to serious adverse<br />

cardiovascular <strong>and</strong> cerebrovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), angina<br />

pectoris, stroke, <strong>and</strong> renal disease [2]. These risks can be avoided by the proper management<br />

of hypertension. <strong>Co</strong>mmonly used anti-hypertensive agents are thiazide-type diuretics such as<br />

hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting<br />

enzyme (ACE)–inhibitors, <strong>and</strong> calcium-channel blockers. 3 Mono therapy is more affective at<br />

initial stages however, in most of the case a combination therapy is recommended to control<br />

hypertension [2, 3]. It is seen that in developed countries, only 27% of hypertensive on<br />

treatment had adequate blood pressure control i.e below 140/90 mmHg [4]. The scenario is<br />

worse in developing countries [5]. In Malaysia a review from the Information <strong>and</strong><br />

Documentation System Unit of the Ministry of Health of Malaysia showed that cardiovascular<br />

disease had been the principal cause of death in government hospitals over the years,<br />

accounting for 23% to 26% of deaths from 1994 to 2001. Cardiovascular disease is the major<br />

cause of hospital admissions <strong>and</strong> death in government hospitals in Malaysia. The National<br />

Health <strong>and</strong> Morbidity survey showed 61% of Malaysians had co-morbidity along with<br />

hypertension. The prevalence of hypertension in Malaysians aged 30 years <strong>and</strong> above was<br />

42.6% in 2006 [6]. The choice of anti hypertensive drug class patients is influenced by, many<br />

factors like the presence of multiple co-morbid conditions <strong>and</strong> the possibility or risk of drugdrug<br />

interactions. To reach an optimum blood pressure level in these patients, combinations<br />

of two or more antihypertensive drug classes may be needed. This study aimed to describe the<br />

pattern of use in a sub-urban government hospital, its compliance with guidelines, <strong>and</strong> its<br />

economic impact.<br />

Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 140


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

Methodology<br />

A cross-sectional retrospective evaluation of prescription was done for the patients attended<br />

Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani.<br />

- Study Duration: The study was conducted from 30 March 2009 to 19 June 2009.<br />

- Study Design: A retrospective study was conducted based on the availability of the<br />

prescription forms of the patients with diagnosis of hypertension. A st<strong>and</strong>ard data<br />

collection form was developed <strong>and</strong> validated by a group of a Pharmacist; Medical<br />

Doctor <strong>and</strong> a Professor. The data form was designed in such a way that it collects the<br />

information about the patient’s demographic characteristics <strong>and</strong> drug utilization<br />

pattern, which includes age, gender, race, indication, dosage of commonly prescribed<br />

antihypertensive drugs in the Hospital.<br />

Sampling Method: All the information was collected with the permission of the director <strong>and</strong><br />

the ethical committee of the state with the supervision of the concern Pharmacist. This<br />

research is registered in Clinical Research Centre (CRC) with a government approval.<br />

Sample sizes of 500 prescription forms of patients with hypertension were selected.<br />

<strong>Co</strong>nvenience sampling technique was employed for the selection of patients. Information was<br />

analyses based on data regarding race, age, gender, indications <strong>and</strong> trends in the prescribing of<br />

antihypertensive medications at Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani. Data analysis<br />

was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 13.0.<br />

The chi-square test was used to determine the differences between proportions. Odd rations<br />

were calculated to identify the groups at higher risk of co-morbidities.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 500 patients’ prescription was collected. The patients receiving medications for<br />

antihypertensive agent were 288 (57.6%) males <strong>and</strong> 212 (42.4%) females. The age<br />

Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 141


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

distribution of 500 patients studied shows that the highest number of patients receiving<br />

medication of antihypertensive agent was within the age range of 51-60 years having 166<br />

(33.2%). In terms of race majority of the patients were Malay 298 (59.6%) followed by<br />

Chinese 113 (22.6%) <strong>and</strong> 89 (17.8%) of Indian (Table 1). In most of the case the patients<br />

have other medical complications in addition to hypertension. Majority, 199 (39.8%) were<br />

with cardiac disease like; angina, Myocardial infraction <strong>and</strong> ischemic heart diseases followed<br />

by Diabetes Mellitus patients <strong>and</strong> renal failure. Details are described in Table 1. However, the<br />

prevalence of comorbid diabetes mellitus was significantly higher among Malays than<br />

Chinese <strong>and</strong> Indians (Table 2). In terms of gender, men were more like to be at the risk of<br />

cardiac complications (OR 1.335 [CI 1.153-1.545]) <strong>and</strong> renal failure (OR 1.128 [CI 0.788-<br />

1.616]). While female were found at higher risk of diabetes mellitus (OR 1.114[CI 0.906-<br />

1.369]). About 318(63.6%) patients were on treatment with poly-therapy for hypertension<br />

while rest were treated with mono-therapy. Beta blockers (BB) were the most frequently<br />

prescribed drugs for antihypertensive treatment. Those receiving antihypertensive therapy, the<br />

most frequently prescribed drug types were, metoprolol 161(32.2%); perindopril 154(30.8%);<br />

amlodipine 98(19.6%); atenolol 67(13.4%); frusemide 66(13.2%); captopril 59(11.8%);<br />

vastarel 58(11.6%); felodipine 57(11.4%); chlorthiazide 42(8.4%); nifedipine 40(8.0%); <strong>and</strong><br />

the least are carvedilol, losartan, ramipril, terazosin 2(0.4% each); <strong>and</strong> doxasin 1(0.2%).<br />

Details about the various anti-hypertensive agents used are shown in Table 3.<br />

Discussion<br />

Findings of the current study demonstrate that the most frequently prescribed antihypertensive<br />

drug class were Beta-Blockers (48.4%). In about n=37 cases it is used as a<br />

single therapy however, in n=205 it is used in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.<br />

Unlike the finding of [1] the use of ACEI, CCBs, Diuretics or ARBs was found least in our<br />

study. BB was observed to be most commonly prescribed regimens. These finding are not in<br />

Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 142


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

compliance with the findings of [1]. Moreover, the compliance level to the Malaysian clinical<br />

practice guidelines for the treatment of hypertension was also low, which prefer the use of<br />

ACEI, CCBs, Diuretics or ARBs as first line of therapy. β-blockers are no longer preferred as<br />

compelling evidence showed that they were associated with 16% increase in the risk of stroke<br />

when compared to other agents [6] <strong>and</strong> an excess cardiovascular event risk of 18% in older<br />

patients (>60years) [7] It has also been shown to increase the incidence of new-onset diabetes<br />

compared to other drugs, especially in those with high metabolic risk [8]. They were the least<br />

effective agents in terms of LVH regression [9] <strong>and</strong> reduced central aortic pressure less<br />

effectively [10] than newer antihypertensive agents. β-blockers should only be prescribed<br />

when compelling indications such as heart failure or ischaemic heart disease co exist [11]. In<br />

addition its is also seen that in about 76 (%) diabetic patients, BB were used in combination or<br />

as a single line of therapy. Evidence are there that discourage the use of BB among diabetic<br />

patients which make it difficult to predict signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms of hypoglycemia such as<br />

tremors <strong>and</strong> tachycardia may be absent, making it more difficult for patients to recognize an<br />

oncoming episode. In addition, multiple effects on glucose metabolism have been reported,<br />

usually with the noncardioselective beta-blockers (e.g., propranolol, pindolol, timolol) but<br />

occasionally also with relatively beta-1 selective agents (e.g., metoprolol).<br />

<strong>Co</strong>nclusion<br />

Polytherapy is the most preferred prescribing pattern for treating hypertension in Hospital<br />

Sultan Abdul Halim when compared to the use of a single type of antihypertensive drug,<br />

monotherapy. The use of beta blockers <strong>and</strong> short-acting preparations were commonly used<br />

both as monotherapy <strong>and</strong> combination treatment. Overall therapy was not found complaint<br />

with the Malaysian guidelines for the management of hypertension.<br />

Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 143


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

References<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease <strong>and</strong> stroke statistics—2007 update:<br />

A report from the American Heart Association Statistics <strong>Co</strong>mmittee <strong>and</strong> Stroke Statistics<br />

Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007;115(5):e69–e6171.<br />

2. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh Report of the Joint National<br />

<strong>Co</strong>mmittee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, <strong>and</strong> Treatment of High Blood Pressure:<br />

The JNC 7 Report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–2572.<br />

3. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with<br />

blood pressure lowering drugs: Analysis of 354 r<strong>and</strong>omised trials. BMJ.<br />

2003;326(7404):1427.<br />

4. <strong>Co</strong>lhoun HM, DongW, Poulter NR. Blood pressure screening, management <strong>and</strong> control<br />

in Engl<strong>and</strong>: results from the health survey for Engl<strong>and</strong>. 1994. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 752–<br />

757.<br />

5. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (eds). The Global Burden of Diseases, <strong>Co</strong>mprehensive<br />

Assessment of Mortality <strong>and</strong> Disability From Diseases, Injuries <strong>and</strong> Risk Factors in 1990<br />

Projected to 2020: World Health Organisation. Harvard University Press: USA 1996.<br />

6. Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta-blockers remain first choice in the<br />

treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005;366(9496):1545-53.<br />

40<br />

7. Khan N, McAlister FA. Re-examining the efficacy of beta-blockers for the treatment of<br />

hypertension: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2006;174(12):1737-42.<br />

8. Elliot WJ, Meyer PM. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a<br />

network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369(9557):201-7.<br />

9. Schmieder RE, Martus P, Klinbeil A. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential<br />

hypertension. A meta-analysis of r<strong>and</strong>omized double-blind studies. JAMA.<br />

1996;275(19):1507-13.<br />

10. Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, et al. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering<br />

drugs on central aortic pressure <strong>and</strong> clinical outcomes: principal results of the <strong>Co</strong>nduit<br />

Artery Function Evaluation (CAFÉ) study. Circulation. 2006; 113(9):1213-25.<br />

11. Malaysian Hypertension Guideline Working Group. Clinical Practice Guidelines on<br />

Management of Hypertension. 3rd ed. 2008. MOH/P/PAK/156.08 (GU).<br />

Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 144


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

Table 1: Demographic <strong>and</strong> Medical information of patients<br />

Demographics N= 500 %<br />

Gender<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

288<br />

212<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

57.6<br />

42.4<br />

Age of Patients Range 12-98 Year<br />

Mean age= 57±12.94<br />

Race<br />

11-20<br />

21-30<br />

31-40<br />

41-50<br />

51-60<br />

61-70<br />

71-80<br />

81-90<br />

>90<br />

Malay<br />

Chinese<br />

Indian<br />

2<br />

9<br />

34<br />

90<br />

166<br />

104<br />

80<br />

13<br />

2<br />

298<br />

113<br />

89<br />

0.4<br />

1.8<br />

6.8<br />

18.0<br />

33.2<br />

20.8<br />

16.0<br />

2.6<br />

0.4<br />

59.6<br />

22.6<br />

17.8<br />

<strong>Co</strong>-morbidities<br />

Heart Disease<br />

Diabetes Mellitus<br />

Renal Failure<br />

199<br />

190<br />

17<br />

39.8<br />

38.0<br />

3.4<br />

Number of Patient with one of Multiple Medical<br />

complication<br />

HPT+DM+CD+RD<br />

HPT+DM+CD<br />

HPT+DM+RD<br />

HPT+CD+RD<br />

HPT+DM<br />

HPT+CD<br />

HPT+RD<br />

HPT alone<br />

1<br />

74<br />

5<br />

2<br />

110<br />

122<br />

9<br />

177<br />

0.2<br />

14.8<br />

1<br />

0.4<br />

22<br />

24.4<br />

1.8<br />

35.4<br />

Vol. 2 No 2 (2011) Page | 145


REVIEW OF GLOBAL MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH (RGMHR)<br />

Table 2: Prevalence of co-morbidities as per Age <strong>and</strong> Race of the Patient<br />

ISSN: 1986-5872<br />

Demographics<br />

Age<br />

Race<br />

11-20<br />

21-30<br />

31-40<br />

41-50<br />

51-60<br />

61-70<br />

71-80<br />

81-90<br />

>90<br />

Malay<br />

Chinese<br />

Indian<br />

Diabetes Mellitus<br />

N(190)<br />

0<br />

2(1.1%)<br />

6(3.2%)<br />

34(17.9%)<br />

75 (39.5%)<br />

38 (20.0%)<br />

29 (15.3%)<br />

6(3.2%)<br />

0<br />

X 2 13.581, df=8, p=

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!