18.11.2014 Views

Szirmai, John - The Archaeology of Medieval Bookbinding

Szirmai, John - The Archaeology of Medieval Bookbinding

Szirmai, John - The Archaeology of Medieval Bookbinding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3 Late Coptic codices<br />

3.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> codices described in this chapter date to the period from the seventh to the eleventh<br />

centuries, when the Coptic Church, already alienated from Byzantium, suffered increasing<br />

oppression by the Arab rule. Initially tolerant towards the Copts, the new rulers later<br />

repeatedly subjected them to severe persecution: not surprisingly, some <strong>of</strong> their scriptures<br />

were found hidden in the Egyptian soil, <strong>of</strong>ten on sites <strong>of</strong> ancient monasteries or rubbish<br />

dumps. <strong>The</strong>se circumstances explain the damaged state <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the finds, <strong>of</strong>ten aggravated<br />

by neglect and carelessness on the part <strong>of</strong> the finders. Usually these codices aroused<br />

interest mainly because <strong>of</strong> the texts; their bindings were considered noteworthy only if decorated,<br />

but in fact some <strong>of</strong> the 85 Coptic 'bindings' listed by G.D. Hobson (1938-9) had<br />

rendered nothing but scraps <strong>of</strong> detached covers.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the finds were made in the 1890s (Upper Egypt, the area <strong>of</strong> Sohag, Esna<br />

and Edfu) and in 1910 (Monastery <strong>of</strong> St Michael <strong>of</strong> the Desert near Hamuli, in the Fayum<br />

region). <strong>The</strong> latter was the more important find as many <strong>of</strong> the more than 50 codices<br />

(dated from AD 827 to 999) were still in their original binding. Religious texts mostly in the<br />

Sahidic dialect prevailed (lives <strong>of</strong> Saints, homilies, synaxaries, parts <strong>of</strong> the Old and New<br />

Testaments and apocryphal works); the majority was written on parchment, some on<br />

papyrus and a few on paper. <strong>The</strong>y found their way into major collections like those in<br />

Vienna, Berlin, London and Cairo, but for the most part went into the Pierpont Morgan<br />

Library in New York. Unfortunately most <strong>of</strong> these bindings were separated from their contents<br />

without any particulars <strong>of</strong> their construction being recorded. 1<br />

As no detailed study <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> bindings has been made public yet, the<br />

present attempt to gather scattered pieces <strong>of</strong> information will inevitably contain lacunae and<br />

conjectures. <strong>The</strong> main source <strong>of</strong> information concerning the bindings <strong>of</strong> the corpus <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Hamuli codices goes back to Father T.C. Petersen, who studied the c. 50 detached covers<br />

in the Pierpont Morgan Library and recorded his detailed observations in his unpublished<br />

typescript (Petersen 1948), which also holds data on another 50 Coptic bindings or fragments<br />

in other collections. In a fundamental article <strong>of</strong> 1954 Petersen published at least<br />

some <strong>of</strong> his data on this material as well as on Islamic bindings. Some technical details <strong>of</strong><br />

the Hamuli codices are given by Miner (1957 pp. 15-18), Needham (1979 pp. 12-23) and<br />

Depuydt (1993). Little pieces <strong>of</strong> information on covers in the Berlin collections are to be<br />

found in articles <strong>of</strong> Ibscher (1911) and Adam (1912b; 1914; 1923-4); data on material in<br />

Vienna are given by Gottlieb (1910), on material in the British Library by D. Cockerell<br />

(1932) and G.D. Hobson (1939). <strong>The</strong> following description is mainly based on these data,<br />

supplemented with some <strong>of</strong> my own observations. 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!