Szirmai, John - The Archaeology of Medieval Bookbinding

Szirmai, John - The Archaeology of Medieval Bookbinding Szirmai, John - The Archaeology of Medieval Bookbinding

18.11.2014 Views

tion: 'Die kunstletisehe Verziemng trill nur in einfacher Form hinzu' (Eichler 1923). Schmidt (1960) castigated his predecessors, blaming them for regarding the exposed sewing on the back as decoration and not recognizing its functional aspects, a misconception which greatly impeded the understanding of die structure of limp bindings. Christ (1937) was the first to describe the earliest and entirely undecoratcd limp bindings dating from the Carolingian era; he lists a dozen of them (10 from Fulda, kept in Kassel GHB and Basle UB), but unfortunately since then much evidence has been whittled away due to harsh repairs. 2 Van Regemorter (1957) re-examined nine Basle limp bindings originating from Fulda. As she failed to recognize that most of the bindings had lost their original sewing due to later interventions and her descriptions are very sketchy and deficient, van Regemorter has left us with more questions than answers. Later careful examination of the centrefolds has revealed redundant sewing holes which proves that many of these limp bindings are not contemporaneous widi their contents (Marshall 1993). Another past misconception was to consider limp bindings as temporary and inferior and work of incompetent laymen. This might apply to simple wrappings used for keeping a few quires together before final binding or for preserving loose archival records, but certainly not to many limp bindings of a radier sophisticated structure diat testify to a high standard of workmanship. Their great diversity is reflected in this chapter, which - in contrast to the preceding ones - covers a number of different typological entities widi die common trait of a limp or semi-limp covering. Admittedly, the judgement of the quality of this feature is arbitrary: laminating a leather or parchment cover with a single sheet of paper leaves it flexible, but pasting 20 leaves togeuier yields a stiff pasteboard cover which calls for a different categorization. A systematic classification of limp bindings is by no means a straightforward matter. At first glance, the mode of attachment of the bookblock to the covering seems to be a useful gauge; however, it overlaps with other characteristics, such as die sewing, the material of the covering, the use of adhesives and the presence or absence of exterior supports. 3 Objects with analogous structures but a markedly different chronology do not make a homogeneous group, and die scarcity of data often prevents a distinction between exceptional and standard work. The following account is hardly more than sampling from a ragbag of an astonishing diversity of binding structures, which are found in the meagre literature and have been observed in my own study of about 1 20 limp bindings.' 1 The sample of my own research is admittedly too small to allow for any statistical evaluation except for one or two instances; moreover, it is biased, since the majority of the material originates from the Low Countries and comprises library books; hence limp bindings dial were so ubiquitous in archives receive too little consideration. Consequently, many important types have certainly escaped attention; others like the vade-mecum were left out as having gone beyond the scope of this account. 5 Finally, it should be emphasized that even though certain limp binding structures remained in use far beyond 1600, their later evolution, with only a lew exceptions, is not considered here.

10.2 BOOKBLOCK ATTACHMENT BY PRIMARY TACKETING Tacketing appears to be one of the most ancient methods for joining die leaves of a quire or attaching them to the covering material: it was the basic construction of the very first singlequire codex (see the Nag Hammadi codices, Figures 1.2 and 1.3). We meet it again both in the Byzantine and Western binding traditions as 'quire tacketing', the temporary joining of the leaves of a quire before they reach the binder (see section 7.4, Figure 7.15; sections 8.3 and 9.4). Tackets usually consist of loosely rolled parchment strips but may be made of leather lacing or thread; the two ends usually pass from the centrefold through two holes and are knotted but more often twisted togedier; twisting may be on the inside or outside a quire. Tackets of sufficient length can be used for joining two or three quires, representing the simplest possible binding structure. An early example of die use of tackets occurs in one of the Fulda limp bindings, namely Basle UB MS F.V.37, which seems to have been written in the second half of the tenth century. The volume contains live quires (188 x 150 mm) with texts of Isidorus; its title 'Planctus Isidoři' in a fifteenth-c en t ury hand is written on the upper cover (Figure 10.1). The back of the limp parchment covering shows knotted tackets of thick parchment (?) strips and two different exterior supports, one a piece of thick, white chamois leather at the head and another of folded parchment at the tail. Closer examination has revealed that two different mediods of racketing were used at the head and a third one at the tail (Figure 10.2), There are several redundant holes in the centrefolds at the head region, none at the tail. Figure 10.1 132 mm). Limp parchment binding with lackering onto exlerior supports (Hasle UB MS F.V.37, s, x, 182 x

10.2 BOOKBLOCK ATTACHMENT BY PRIMARY TACKETING<br />

Tacketing appears to be one <strong>of</strong> the most ancient methods for joining die leaves <strong>of</strong> a quire or<br />

attaching them to the covering material: it was the basic construction <strong>of</strong> the very first singlequire<br />

codex (see the Nag Hammadi codices, Figures 1.2 and 1.3). We meet it again both in<br />

the Byzantine and Western binding traditions as 'quire tacketing', the temporary joining <strong>of</strong><br />

the leaves <strong>of</strong> a quire before they reach the binder (see section 7.4, Figure 7.15; sections 8.3<br />

and 9.4). Tackets usually consist <strong>of</strong> loosely rolled parchment strips but may be made <strong>of</strong><br />

leather lacing or thread; the two ends usually pass from the centrefold through two holes<br />

and are knotted but more <strong>of</strong>ten twisted togedier; twisting may be on the inside or outside a<br />

quire. Tackets <strong>of</strong> sufficient length can be used for joining two or three quires, representing<br />

the simplest possible binding structure.<br />

An early example <strong>of</strong> die use <strong>of</strong> tackets occurs in one <strong>of</strong> the Fulda limp bindings,<br />

namely Basle UB MS F.V.37, which seems to have been written in the second half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tenth century. <strong>The</strong> volume contains live quires (188 x 150 mm) with texts <strong>of</strong> Isidorus; its<br />

title 'Planctus Isidoři' in a fifteenth-c en t ury hand is written on the upper cover (Figure<br />

10.1). <strong>The</strong> back <strong>of</strong> the limp parchment covering shows knotted tackets <strong>of</strong> thick parchment<br />

(?) strips and two different exterior supports, one a piece <strong>of</strong> thick, white chamois leather at<br />

the head and another <strong>of</strong> folded parchment at the tail. Closer examination has revealed that<br />

two different mediods <strong>of</strong> racketing were used at the head and a third one at the tail (Figure<br />

10.2), <strong>The</strong>re are several redundant holes in the centrefolds at the head region, none at the<br />

tail.<br />

Figure 10.1<br />

132 mm).<br />

Limp parchment binding with lackering onto exlerior supports (Hasle UB MS F.V.37, s, x, 182 x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!