18.11.2014 Views

Santa Clara River Trail Final Master Plan - Development Services ...

Santa Clara River Trail Final Master Plan - Development Services ...

Santa Clara River Trail Final Master Plan - Development Services ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5: Benefit Cost Analysis<br />

The benefit-cost ratio weighs the anticipated annual benefits of the pathway against the estimated<br />

construction and maintenance costs for the pathway. The estimated construction cost for this project is<br />

$7.1 million. For benefit-cost analyses, construction costs incurred from 2011 to 2015 and annual<br />

maintenance and operating costs over 30 years are adjusted to net present value (NPV). Annual benefits<br />

(2011 dollars) were calculated based on high estimates, best estimates and low estimates for the number<br />

of bicycle commuters that would use the <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Clara</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Trail</strong>, following the NCHRP Report 552<br />

methodology for both 5 percent and 2.5 percent discount rates.<br />

Existing Count Data<br />

This analysis is informed by count data on trails in areas with similar climate and number of rideable<br />

days per year. This analysis assumes that walking and bicycling use on the <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Clara</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Trail</strong> will be<br />

similar to that of the Ballona Creek Path, which is a river path connecting to the beach at Marina del Ray,<br />

a popular recreation destination. The Los Angeles <strong>River</strong> Path is a regional trail system similar to the<br />

eventual nature of the <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Clara</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Trail</strong>.<br />

Count data are available from the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition’s 2009 Bicycle and Pedestrian<br />

Count and from counts conducted as part of the Culver City Bicycle and Pedestrian <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (Draft<br />

2010). Counts are shown in Table 4.<br />

Table 4. Comparison of Pedestrian and Bicycle Counts on Similar <strong>Trail</strong>s<br />

Morning Peak Afternoon Peak Weekend Midday<br />

Location<br />

Ped Bike Ratio Ped Bike Ratio Ped Bike Ratio<br />

L.A. Bike Count<br />

Orange Line multi-use path<br />

Reseda & Orange Line 1244 104 12.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Woodman & Orange Line 195 83 2.3 133 49 2.7 68 77 0.9<br />

LA <strong>River</strong> at Baum Bridge 48 110 0.4 46 164 0.3 11 95 0.1<br />

Ballona Creek N/A N/A N/A 181 353 0.5 421 1251 0.3<br />

Culver City Bicycle & Pedestrian <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Ballona Creel at Overland 34 63 0.5 31 94 0.3 81 285 0.3<br />

Ballona Creek Duquesne 36 51 0.7 N/A N/A N/A 7 107 0.1<br />

One of the purposes of this data is to determine the typical ratio of pedestrian to bicyclists, as the<br />

NCHRP Report 552 methodology considers only the increase in bicyclists on the trail. Assuming that the<br />

ratio of pedestrians to bicyclists will remain constant provides an estimate of future pedestrian use of the<br />

trail. Table 4 shows a significantly different ratio of pedestrians to bicyclists on the Orange Line multiuse<br />

path on other, non-transit-corridor trails. The ratios from the L.A. <strong>River</strong> <strong>Trail</strong> at Baum Bridge and<br />

along Ballona Creek are similar (ranging from 0.03 to 0.01). The average of those is used in this analysis.<br />

66 | Alta <strong>Plan</strong>ning + Design

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!