Monitor Vol 39 08_Final_Nov08.pdf - tips
Monitor Vol 39 08_Final_Nov08.pdf - tips
Monitor Vol 39 08_Final_Nov08.pdf - tips
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Food Policy<br />
90<br />
Trade & Industry <strong>Monitor</strong><br />
Transactions along the corporate food chain have increased in the past<br />
two years. Between 2004 and 2006, total global food spending grew by<br />
16 percent, from US$5.5 trillion to 6.4 trillion (Planet Retail 2007a). In the<br />
same period, the sales of food retailers increased by a disproportionately<br />
large amount compared to the sales of food processors and of companies<br />
in the food input industry (Figure 4). The sales of the top food processors<br />
and traders grew by 13 percent, and the sales of the top 10 companies<br />
producing agricultural inputs (agrochemicals, seeds, and traits) increased<br />
by 8 percent. The sales of the top food retailers, however, soared by more<br />
than 40 percent. While supermarkets account for a large share of retail<br />
sales in most developed and many developing countries, independent<br />
grocers continue to represent 85 percent of retail sales in Vietnam and 77<br />
percent in India (Euromonitor 2007).<br />
The process of horizontal consolidation in the agricultural-input industry<br />
continues on a global scale. The three leading agrochemical companies—Bayer<br />
Crop Science, Syngenta, and BASF—account for roughly half<br />
of the total market (UNCTAD 2006). In contrast, the top five retailers do<br />
not capture more than a 13-percent share of the market. Global data,<br />
however, mask substantial differences between countries; while the top<br />
five retailers account for 57 percent of grocery sales in Venezuela, they<br />
represent less than 4 percent of sales in Indonesia (Euromonitor 2007).<br />
Vertical integration of the food supply chain increases the synergies between<br />
agricultural inputs, processing, and retail, but overall competition<br />
within the different segments of the world food chain remains strong.<br />
1.5. The Changing Supply-and-Demand<br />
Framework of the Food Equation<br />
The above-mentioned changes on the supply and demand side of the<br />
world food equation have led to imbalances and drastic price changes.<br />
Between 2000 and 2006, world demand for cereals increased by 8 percent<br />
while cereal prices increased by about 50 percent (Figure 5).<br />
Thereafter, prices more than doubled by early 20<strong>08</strong> (compared to 2000).<br />
Supply is very inelastic, which means that it does not respond quickly<br />
to price changes. Typically, aggregate agriculture supply increases by 1<br />
to 2 percent when prices increase by 10 percent. That supply response<br />
decreases further when farm prices are more volatile, but increases as<br />
the result of improved infrastructure and access to technology and rural<br />
finance.<br />
The consumption of cereals has been consistently higher than production<br />
in recent years and that has reduced stocks. A breakdown of cereal demand<br />
by type of use gives insights into the factors that have contributed<br />
to the greater increase in consumption. While cereal use for food and feed<br />
increased by 4 and 7 percent since 2000, respectively, the use of cereals<br />
for industrial purposes—such as biofuel production—increased by more<br />
than25 percent (FAO 2003 and 2007b). In the United States alone, the<br />
use of corn for ethanol production increased by two and a half times<br />
between 2000 and 2006 (Earth Policy Institute 2007).<br />
Figure 5: Global supply and demand for cereals, 2000 and 2006<br />
P<br />
(2000=100)<br />
153<br />
D<br />
2000<br />
S<br />
2006<br />
100<br />
S<br />
2000<br />
D<br />
2006<br />
1,917 2,070<br />
Q<br />
million tons<br />
Notes: Supply and demand of cereals refer to the production and consumption of wheat, coarse grains, and rice.<br />
Source: Data from FAO 2003, 2005, 2006b, 2007b, and 2007c.