Monitor Vol 39 08_Final_Nov08.pdf - tips

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) and FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2007. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2007–2016. Paris. von Braun, J. 2005. The world food situation:An overview. Prepared for CGIAR Annual General Meeting, Marrakech, Morocco, December 6, 2005. Pingali, P. 2006.Westernization of Asian diets and the transformation of food systems: Implications for research and policy. Food Policy 32: 2881– 298. Planet Retail. 2007a. Buoyant year forecast for global grocery retail sales. Press Release May 4. Available at:www.planetretail. net/Home/PressReleases/PressRelease.aspx?PressReleaseID=54980. ————.2007b.Top 30 ranking by Planet Retail reveals changes at the top. Press Release May 9. Available at:www.planetretail. net/Home/Press- Releases/PressRelease.aspx?PressReleaseID=55074. Ravallion, M., S. Chen, and P. Sangraula. 2007. New evidence on the urbanization of global poverty.Washington D.C.:World Bank. ————.2007. When food makes fuel—the promises and challenges of biofuels. Crawford Fund. Canberra,Australia. WFP (World Food Programme). 2007. Food aid flows 2006. International Food Aid Information System (INTERFAIS). Rome. Available at:www.wfp. org/interfais/index2.htm. Wiesmann,D., A.K. Sost, I. Schöninger, H. Dalzell, L. Kiess,T. Arnold, and S. Collins. The challenge of hunger 2007. Bonn, Washington,D.C., and Dublin: Deutsche Welthungerhilfe, International Food Policy Research Institute, and Concern. World Bank. 2007a.World development report 2008:Agriculture for development.Washington,D.C. 103 Trade & Industry Monitor Regmi,A., M. S. Deepak, J. L. Seale, Jr., and J. Bernstein. 2001. Cross-country analysis of food consumption patterns. In Changing structure of global food consumption and trade, ed. A. Regmi. Washington,D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. ————.2007b.World development indicators.Washington,D.C. Seale, J. Jr.,A. Regmi, and J. Bernstein. 2003. International evidence on food consumption patterns. Technical Bulletin No. TB1904. Washington,D. C.: United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Schmidhuber, J. 2007. Impact of an increased biomass use on agricultural markets, prices and food security:A longer-term perspective. Mimeo. Tubiello, F. N., and G. Fischer. 2007. Reducing climate change impacts on agriculture: Global and regional effects of mitigation, 2000–2080.Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74: 1030–56. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2006. Tracking the trend towards market concentration the case of the agricultural input industry. Geneva. ————.2007.World investment report 2007. Geneva. UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). 2006. The state of the world’s children 2006: Excluded and invisible. New York. The World Food Situation: new driving forces and required actions
Food Policy Questionnaire 104 Trade & Industry Monitor Please take a few minutes to respond to the following questions. Your comments are important to us and we value your input. With your feedback we can improve the Monitor, making it more interesting and valuable for you. Please tick the response that most accurately represents your thoughts. We know your time is valuable and thank you for taking time to share your opinion with us. Your name............................................................................................................................................................................ Mailing address.................................................................................................................................................................... May we call you? If yes please, provide your telephone number.................................................................................... 1. Do you enjoy reading the Monitor? Yes No 2. How much of the Monitor do you read? All of it Approximately 75% About 50% About 50% At least one article Portions of articles Skim the highlights Don’t read at all 3. How much time do you spend reading each issue? Hours Minutes 4. If you don’t read our publication, why? Not interested No time Other 5. How would you rate the visual appeal of the Monitor? Excellent Good Average Poor 6. Photographs are used in the publication. Do you think there are Too many An appropriate number More needed 7. Do you find the Monitor easy to read? Yes No Why or why not?......................................................................................................................... 8. When do you read the Monitor? Immediately The day it is received Within one week Prior to the next issue It’s in my reading file Glance and discard 9. Are there other topics you would like to see covered in the newsletter? Yes No If yes what are they? ...................................................................................................................
Page 1 and 2:
TIPS T R A D E & I N D U S T R Y M
Page 3 and 4:
TIPS Executive director: Stephen ha
Page 6 and 7:
trade policy 1 Why OECD countries s
Page 8 and 9:
Table 1: EU and U.S. Examples of Re
Page 10 and 11:
Table 3: Preferences and Utilizatio
Page 12 and 13:
The third result implies that the s
Page 14 and 15:
where “NAFTA markup” is the per
Page 16 and 17:
exports toward already high levels
Page 18 and 19:
in a multiregional trade model. Des
Page 20 and 21:
value added in least developed econ
Page 22 and 23:
11. The decline in exports to the p
Page 24 and 25:
trade policy 19 Global Trade Models
Page 26 and 27:
depending on whether or not the dat
Page 28 and 29:
Although these three studies examin
Page 30 and 31:
countries are vulnerable to trade s
Page 32 and 33:
OECD data, Gurgel et al. (2006) sho
Page 34 and 35:
The credibility of CGE models will
Page 36 and 37:
9th Annual Conference on Global Eco
Page 38 and 39:
industrial policy 33 Industrial Pol
Page 40 and 41:
1991-2004 when South Africa’s per
Page 42 and 43:
of clothing and textiles 14 . These
Page 44 and 45:
will need to be embodied in new wel
Page 46 and 47:
Second, the constraints imposed by
Page 48 and 49:
Edwards, L. and Lawrence, R. (2006)
Page 50 and 51:
environmental policy 45 Biofuels, a
Page 52 and 53:
By 2011 around 20% of Brazilian bio
Page 54 and 55:
5. Starving the People to Feed Cars
Page 56 and 57:
In policy terms, improving the bene
Page 58 and 59: environmental policy 53 Commerciali
Page 60 and 61: (PMS) with ethanol and help cushion
Page 62 and 63: The low levels of modern (commercia
Page 64 and 65: oil. Efforts are in place to establ
Page 66 and 67: since it is the first barrier that
Page 68 and 69: plant size. The optimum plant size
Page 70 and 71: the local environment). On the posi
Page 72 and 73: 15 World Bank, world development in
Page 74 and 75: environmental policy 69 Climate cha
Page 76 and 77: individual African countries are re
Page 78 and 79: Table 3: Fossil fuel production and
Page 80 and 81: The re-injection process is estimat
Page 82 and 83: References 1 IPCC, 2005, IPCC Speci
Page 84 and 85: food policy 79 Rising food prices:
Page 86 and 87: But food prices have risen since th
Page 88 and 89: 9. The Medium-term Response Rising
Page 90 and 91: food policy 85 The World Food Situa
Page 92 and 93: Figure 1: World cereal production,
Page 94 and 95: trade liberalization and the integr
Page 96 and 97: Supply and demand changes do not fu
Page 98 and 99: Figure 9: Brazil: Ethanol and sugar
Page 100 and 101: Great technological strides are exp
Page 102 and 103: Figure 12: Modeling the actual pric
Page 104 and 105: Figure 14: Changes in the Global Hu
Page 106 and 107: 4. The acute risks facing the poor
Page 110: 105 10. Currently, the Monitor is d
show all

Monitor Vol 39 08_Final_Nov08.pdf - tips

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?