17.11.2014 Views

Orientalism - autonomous learning

Orientalism - autonomous learning

Orientalism - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

278 ORIENTALISM<br />

<strong>Orientalism</strong> Now<br />

279<br />

It is no accident, therefore, that Gibb's master theme, in almost<br />

everything he wrote about Islam and the Arabs, was the tension<br />

between "Islam" as a transcendent, compelling Oriental fact and<br />

the realities of everyday human experience. His investment as a<br />

scholar and as a devout Christian was in "Islam," not so much in<br />

the (to him) relatively trivial complications introduced .into Islam<br />

by nationalism, class struggle, the individualizing experiences of<br />

love, anger, or human work. Nowhere is the impoverishing character<br />

of this investment more evident than in Whither Islam?, a<br />

volume edited and contributed to, in the title essay, by Gibb in<br />

1932. (It also includes an impressive article on North African<br />

Islam bv Massirmon.) Gibb's task as he saw it was to assess Islam,<br />

its possible future course. In such a task the<br />

different regions of the Islamic world<br />

were to be, not refutations of Islam's unity, but examoles of it<br />

Gibb himself proposed an introductor<br />

in the concluding essay, he sought to pronounce on its acmamy<br />

and its real future. Like Macdonald, Gibb seems entirely comfortable<br />

with the idea of a monolithic East, whose existential circumstances<br />

cannot easily be reduced to race or racial theory; in<br />

resolutely denying the value of racial generalization Gibb rises<br />

above what had been most reprehensible in preceding generations<br />

of Orientalists. Gibb has a correspondingly generous and sympathetic<br />

view of Islam's universalism and tolerance in letting diverse<br />

ethnic and religious communities coexist peacefully and democratically<br />

within its imperium. There is a note of grim prophecy in<br />

Gibb's singling out the Zionists and the Maronite Christians, alone<br />

amongst ethnic communities in the Islamic world, for their inability<br />

to accept coexistence. 94<br />

But the heart of Gibb's argument is that Islam, perhaps because<br />

it finally represents the Oriental's exclusive concern not with nature<br />

but with the Unseen, has an ultimate precedence and domination<br />

over all life in the Islamic Orient For Gibb Islam is Islamic<br />

orthodoxy, is also the community of believers, is life, unity,<br />

intelligibility, values. It is law and order too, the unsavory disruptions<br />

of jihadists and communist agitators notwithstanding.<br />

In page after page of Gibb's prose in Whither Islam?, we learn that<br />

the new commercial banks in Egypt and Syria are facts of Islam<br />

or an Islamic initiative; schools and an increasing literacy rate are<br />

Islamic facts, too, as are journalism, Westernization, and intellectual<br />

societies. At no ooint does Gibb speak of European colonialism<br />

when he discusses the rise of nationalism and its "toxins." That<br />

the history of modern Islam might be more intelligible for its<br />

resistance, political and nonpolitical, to colonialism, never occurs<br />

to Gibb, just as it seems to him finally irrelevant to note whether<br />

the "Islamic" governments he discusses are republican, feudal, or<br />

monarchical.<br />

"Islam" for Gibb is a sort. of superstructure imperiled both by<br />

politics (nationalism, communist agitation, Westernization) and by<br />

dangerous Muslim attempts to tamper with its intellectual soVereignty.<br />

In the passage that follows, note how the word religion and<br />

its cognates are made to color the tone of Gibb's prose, so much so<br />

that we feel a decorous annoyance at the mundane pressures<br />

directed at "Islam":<br />

Islam, as' a religion, has lost little of its force, but Islam as the<br />

arbiter of social life [in the modern world} is being dethroned;<br />

alongside it, or above it, new forces exert an authority.which is<br />

sometimes in contradiction to its traditions and its social prescripbut<br />

nevertheless forces its way in their teeth. To put the<br />

pU!>I[!Un in its simplest terms, what has happened is this. Until<br />

the ordinary Muslim citizen and cultivator had rio<br />

and no literature of easy access<br />

except religious literature, no festivals and no communal life<br />

except in connection with religion, saw little or nothing of the<br />

outside world except through glasses. To him, in consequence,<br />

religion meant everything. Now, however, more in all the<br />

advanced countries, his interests have expanded and his activities<br />

are no longer bounded by religion. He has<br />

thrust on his notice; he or has read to him, a mass of<br />

on subjects of all kinds which have nothing to do with<br />

and in which the religious point of view may not be discussea<br />

all and the verdict held to lie with some quite different nr;o,,;...jp<<br />

... [Emphasis added}9U<br />

Admittedly, the picture is a little difficult to see, since unlike<br />

any other religion Islam is or means everything. As a description<br />

of a human phenomenon the hyperbole is, I think, unique to<br />

Orientali~m. Life itself-politics, literature, energy, activity, growth<br />

-is an intrusion upon this (to a Westerner) unimaginable Oriental<br />

totality. Yet as '~a complement and counterbalance to European<br />

civilisation" Islam in its modem form is nevertheless a useful object:<br />

this is the core of Gibb's proposition about modem Islam. For "in<br />

the broadest aspect of history, what is now happening between

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!