17.11.2014 Views

I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net

I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net

I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

scandalous, often impossible behavior to be in keeping with the Sufi practice<br />

of malamat (being blameworthy), in which the initiate adopts a mode of<br />

conduct that consciously alienates those around him, ruining the good<br />

reputation strived for by conventional citizens. <strong>The</strong> practice of malamat<br />

might very well have been learned by the young Gurdjieff through an<br />

encounter with the Malamti Sufi Order, an initiatory body founded in the<br />

eighth century that has exercised a powerful underground influence upon the<br />

magical tradition.<br />

Such systematic ruination of one's standing in society is of course<br />

also a standard practice of advanced left-hand path adepts, whose god-like<br />

contempt for the slave values of the pashu manifest in extreme rejection of<br />

all of the props of mass-approved comportment. If Gurdjieff did not go quite<br />

as far as the Aghori in this radical detachment from that being he disdainfully<br />

referred to as "the normal man", his actions seem to have served the same<br />

initiatory purposes, for him, and for those willing victims he entangled in his<br />

teaching.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is one frequently ignored detail in Gurdjieff's life that places<br />

his often puzzling behavior in an illuminating context. It seems fairly certain<br />

that Gurdjieff's own restless trek through Tibet and possible contact to the<br />

court of the Dalai Lama was made whilst in the service of the Tsarist<br />

intelligence service. lie seems to have carried out this assignment under the<br />

convenient guise of a spiritual seeker, and may well have continued his<br />

intelligence work for other nations after the Bolshevik revolution.<br />

Gurdjieff's withering contempt for politics, patriotism and government<br />

policy of any kind – which often dismayed his more idealistic disciples –<br />

was surely as informed by his experience as an undercover operative who<br />

had been privy to the behind-the-scenes operations of the world, as by any<br />

metaphysical understanding. Thus Gurdjieff could assume the seemingly<br />

contradictory roles of Tsarist spy and minor Nazi collaborator, among many<br />

others, with little hand-wringing over conventional ethics.<br />

Was this stance simply Gurdjieff's mystical rationalization for<br />

indulging a generally roguish character? lie never explained directly, but his<br />

life-long pattern of creating elaborate initiatory crises and traumas for his<br />

disciples, sexual or otherwise, thus forcing them to think for themselves or<br />

fail in the attempt, seems clear enough. Although it can be argued that<br />

223<br />

Crowley's similar courting of scandal and public infamy may have served<br />

the same purpose, one gets the impression that Gurdjieff was much more<br />

controlled and premeditated in applying this strategy. Like the medieval lefthand<br />

path Master Drugpa Kunley, Gurdjieff sought to awaken his pupils<br />

through shock treatment, disillusioning them as harshly as possible.<br />

Gurdjieff biographer James Webb describes the one recorded<br />

meeting of Gurdjieff and Crowley; based on what he claims are first-hand<br />

reports. (Lawrence Sutin, in his Do What Thou Wilt: A Life <strong>Of</strong> Aleister<br />

Crowley casts some doubt on this account.) If the encounter occurred as<br />

described, it can be interpreted as meaning that either Gurdjieff sensed an<br />

essential hollowness at the core of Crowley's persona, or merely felt that he<br />

had to place any likely competitor in the Western guru game in his place.<br />

After Crowley spent a fairly innocuous weekend at Gurdjieff's Institute for<br />

the Harmonious Development of Man in Fountainbleau, Gurdjieff allegedly<br />

turned upon his infamous guest and treated him to a furious public<br />

denunciation. "You are filthy, all dirty inside. You never come in my house<br />

again!", Gurdjieff shouted at the Great Beast 666, whom according to some<br />

eyewitnesses at the meeting of mages, skulked off in a rare state of<br />

embarrassment. Considering that Gurdjieff declared that one of his missions<br />

in the West was the eradication of occultism and the delusions it excites, it<br />

may be that he saw the arch-occultist Crowley as a prime target.<br />

Gurdjieff's system grants none of the special importance to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!