17.11.2014 Views

SUFFiciENcy EcONOMy ANd GRASSROOtS DEvElOPMENt

SUFFiciENcy EcONOMy ANd GRASSROOtS DEvElOPMENt

SUFFiciENcy EcONOMy ANd GRASSROOtS DEvElOPMENt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Meaning of Sufficiency Economy <br />

International Conference<br />

187<br />

capitalist enterprises, we might do business with cooperatives, non-profits, green<br />

businesses, or socially responsible ones. And in terms of finance, we might forgo the<br />

big banks and deal with credit unions, cooperative or community banks, or<br />

microfinance institutions that keep money in the community and offer low-interest<br />

loans or sweat equity options. In revealing the entire body of the iceberg, JK<br />

Gibson-Graham and their colleagues disrupt capitalocentrism—which means<br />

defining all economic activities in terms of their relation to capitalism (e.g.,<br />

compatible with, contained within, the same as, etc.), thereby paving the way for a<br />

potentially infinite array of economic practices, relations, and identities.<br />

Their conception of community economy follows from this economic plurality<br />

and adds the ethical element:<br />

The community economy is a normative representation of the diverse<br />

economy, one in which certain ethics are valued over others. In a community<br />

economy our interdependence with each other and with all earth others is<br />

recognized and respected as we negotiate: what is necessary to personal,<br />

social and ecological survival; how social surplus is appropriated and<br />

distributed; whether and how social surplus is to be produced and consumed;<br />

[and] how a commons is produced and sustained. (“Community Economies”)<br />

These authors and activists stop short of specifying which ethics should be<br />

valued. They aim instead to open up space for debating relevant ethics and exploring<br />

alternatives. They do, however, stress interdependence, with nature as central to our<br />

communal wellbeing.<br />

One last thought on community economies. It may seem from the descriptions<br />

above that a community economy suggests small scale. Certainly, in many ways it<br />

fits into calls by some to localize in response to the ravages of globalization. But a<br />

community economy could be regional, national, or even global. Members of a<br />

given community economy need not be in geographic proximity, though they should<br />

meet or be working toward Daly and Cobb’s four community criteria. Moreover, a<br />

community economy must recognize our embeddedness in larger contexts, even our<br />

inextricable connections with the global economy. Given the dynamics of social life,<br />

it’s not reasonable to envision a “return to tradition” in terms of organization (small<br />

communities) or facilely privilege “local” over “global,” particularly in terms of the<br />

knowledge, skills, and so on that make up the commons. In reality, people select<br />

from a wide variety of ideas and techniques available to them from global, regional,<br />

local, and historical sources. In the imaginative combination of these elements,<br />

something entirely new is fashioned.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!