Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

17.11.2014 Views

26 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industries the surface and it would likely run under the Magela Creek, which feeds the Ramsar listed wetlands of Kakadu. There was no requirement for environmental assessment for this as it is described as “exploration activity.” ERA estimates that, if mined, Ranger 3 Deeps would yield 34,000 tons of uranium. The Mirarr have no opportunity to veto mining at Ranger and have made it clear they expect the highest level of environmental assessment and scrutiny to be applied to any new mining activity on their land. Heap Leaching—Abandoned Before It Started In 2011 plans for a large “acid heap leach facility” at Ranger were abandoned. The proposal involved spraying sulfuric acid onto heaps of low grade ore and then collecting the resulting slurry for processing into uranium oxide. This method of uranium extraction has never been tested in a wet/dry tropical environment like Kakadu and posed severe contamination threats. The Mirarr were very concerned by this proposal and made their opposition to it clear. Recommendations Uranium is a unique mineral with specific properties and risks. As such it requires special attention and scrutiny from state parties, regulators and producers. As noted in a 2009 European Commission report, 62 the vast majority of uranium exploration, mining and processing occurs on indigenous lands. This fact requires heightened attention to ensuring the necessary preconditions for the realization of free, prior and informed consent are met. There must also be clear and independent verification and dispute resolution processes for all stages of any proposed mining operation. The waste from uranium mining is dangerous and long lasting. It contains around 85 percent of the original radioactivity of the mined rock. The mining process makes the radioactivity far more available to cause harm to humans than than in its natural state. Combined with the long-lived nature of the radioactivity, this means that significantly greater attention must be given to closure and post-closure planning and management.

Chapter 1.1: Overview of Impacts of Extractive Industries on Indigenous Peoples 27 The Coal Industry and the Indigenous Peoples of Kemerovo Oblast 63 By Dmitry Berezhkov, Vice-President, Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) Kemerovo Oblast is situated in the southern part of West Siberia. The Oblast is one of the most industrially-developed regions of Russia and has a population of over 2.5 million people. Its economy is based on the coal and smelting industries. The total geological coal resources of Kuznetsky Basin (Kuzbas) are estimated at over 700 billion tons, which amounts to approximately 70 percent of all the coal resources of Russia. The region produces approximately 100 million tons of coal annually, which is around 60 percent of all the coal in Russia. Prior to the economic crisis of 2008, this was around 180 million per year. Over a hundred coal-producing companies are operating in the region. European countries are the main consumers of Kuzbas coal: the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Denmark, as well as China, South Korea and Turkey. In all, coal accounts for over 70 percent of the Oblast’s foreign trade. In 2011, around 70 million tons of coal was exported, creating total revenue of approx. US$7 billion. Russia’s largest smelting and power-producing companies are also active in the Oblast, including the OJSC Gurievsky Smelting Plant, the OJSC Koks, the OJSC Kuznetskie Ferrosplavy, the OJSC Mechel, the OJSC SUEK and Evraz Holding. The Indigenous Peoples of the Region The small number of indigenous peoples that historically populate Kemerovo Oblast are the Shorts and the Teleut. Around 13,000 Shorts live in Russia in all, of which 11,000 live in Kemerovo Oblast. There are approximately 2,500 Teleut living in the Oblast. These Turkic peoples mostly live in the south and southeast of the Oblast, generally in the mountain taiga area, known since the early 1900s as Shoria Mountain. The Shorts’ main occupation today is agriculture, including cereal crops, cattle farming and bee farming. They also continue to live according to their traditional livelihoods, however, which includes hunting, fishing and cedar nut harvesting. These indigenous peoples account for only 0.5 percent of Kemerovo Oblast’s population. There are no purely Shorts or Teleut settlements in the Oblast—settlements usually have a mixed population. There are, however, several dozen settlements with a dominant Shorts or Teleut population; in most cases, these are very small villages. The Shorts, an ancient nation from South Siberia, were among

26 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

the surface <strong>and</strong> it would likely run under the Magela Creek, which feeds<br />

the Ramsar listed wetl<strong>and</strong>s of Kakadu.<br />

There was no requirement for environmental assessment for this as it is<br />

described as “exploration activity.” ERA estimates that, if mined, Ranger 3<br />

Deeps would yield 34,000 tons of uranium. The Mirarr have no opportunity<br />

to veto mining at Ranger <strong>and</strong> have made it clear they expect the highest<br />

level of environmental assessment <strong>and</strong> scrutiny to be applied to any new<br />

mining activity on their l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Heap Leaching—Ab<strong>and</strong>oned Before It Started<br />

In 2011 plans for a large “acid heap leach facility” at Ranger were<br />

ab<strong>and</strong>oned. The proposal involved spraying sulfuric acid onto heaps<br />

of low grade ore <strong>and</strong> then collecting the resulting slurry for processing<br />

into uranium oxide. This method of uranium extraction has never been<br />

tested in a wet/dry tropical environment like Kakadu <strong>and</strong> posed severe<br />

contamination threats. The Mirarr were very concerned by this proposal<br />

<strong>and</strong> made their opposition to it clear.<br />

Recommendations<br />

Uranium is a unique mineral with specific properties <strong>and</strong> risks. As such it<br />

requires special attention <strong>and</strong> scrutiny from state parties, regulators <strong>and</strong><br />

producers.<br />

As noted in a 2009 European Commission report, 62 the vast majority<br />

of uranium exploration, mining <strong>and</strong> processing occurs on indigenous<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s. This fact requires heightened attention to ensuring the necessary<br />

preconditions for the realization of free, prior <strong>and</strong> informed consent are<br />

met. There must also be clear <strong>and</strong> independent verification <strong>and</strong> dispute<br />

resolution processes for all stages of any proposed mining operation.<br />

The waste from uranium mining is dangerous <strong>and</strong> long lasting. It contains<br />

around 85 percent of the original radioactivity of the mined rock. The<br />

mining process makes the radioactivity far more available to cause harm<br />

to humans than than in its natural state. Combined with the long-lived<br />

nature of the radioactivity, this means that significantly greater attention<br />

must be given to closure <strong>and</strong> post-closure planning <strong>and</strong> management.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!