Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links
Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links
26 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industries the surface and it would likely run under the Magela Creek, which feeds the Ramsar listed wetlands of Kakadu. There was no requirement for environmental assessment for this as it is described as “exploration activity.” ERA estimates that, if mined, Ranger 3 Deeps would yield 34,000 tons of uranium. The Mirarr have no opportunity to veto mining at Ranger and have made it clear they expect the highest level of environmental assessment and scrutiny to be applied to any new mining activity on their land. Heap Leaching—Abandoned Before It Started In 2011 plans for a large “acid heap leach facility” at Ranger were abandoned. The proposal involved spraying sulfuric acid onto heaps of low grade ore and then collecting the resulting slurry for processing into uranium oxide. This method of uranium extraction has never been tested in a wet/dry tropical environment like Kakadu and posed severe contamination threats. The Mirarr were very concerned by this proposal and made their opposition to it clear. Recommendations Uranium is a unique mineral with specific properties and risks. As such it requires special attention and scrutiny from state parties, regulators and producers. As noted in a 2009 European Commission report, 62 the vast majority of uranium exploration, mining and processing occurs on indigenous lands. This fact requires heightened attention to ensuring the necessary preconditions for the realization of free, prior and informed consent are met. There must also be clear and independent verification and dispute resolution processes for all stages of any proposed mining operation. The waste from uranium mining is dangerous and long lasting. It contains around 85 percent of the original radioactivity of the mined rock. The mining process makes the radioactivity far more available to cause harm to humans than than in its natural state. Combined with the long-lived nature of the radioactivity, this means that significantly greater attention must be given to closure and post-closure planning and management.
Chapter 1.1: Overview of Impacts of Extractive Industries on Indigenous Peoples 27 The Coal Industry and the Indigenous Peoples of Kemerovo Oblast 63 By Dmitry Berezhkov, Vice-President, Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) Kemerovo Oblast is situated in the southern part of West Siberia. The Oblast is one of the most industrially-developed regions of Russia and has a population of over 2.5 million people. Its economy is based on the coal and smelting industries. The total geological coal resources of Kuznetsky Basin (Kuzbas) are estimated at over 700 billion tons, which amounts to approximately 70 percent of all the coal resources of Russia. The region produces approximately 100 million tons of coal annually, which is around 60 percent of all the coal in Russia. Prior to the economic crisis of 2008, this was around 180 million per year. Over a hundred coal-producing companies are operating in the region. European countries are the main consumers of Kuzbas coal: the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Denmark, as well as China, South Korea and Turkey. In all, coal accounts for over 70 percent of the Oblast’s foreign trade. In 2011, around 70 million tons of coal was exported, creating total revenue of approx. US$7 billion. Russia’s largest smelting and power-producing companies are also active in the Oblast, including the OJSC Gurievsky Smelting Plant, the OJSC Koks, the OJSC Kuznetskie Ferrosplavy, the OJSC Mechel, the OJSC SUEK and Evraz Holding. The Indigenous Peoples of the Region The small number of indigenous peoples that historically populate Kemerovo Oblast are the Shorts and the Teleut. Around 13,000 Shorts live in Russia in all, of which 11,000 live in Kemerovo Oblast. There are approximately 2,500 Teleut living in the Oblast. These Turkic peoples mostly live in the south and southeast of the Oblast, generally in the mountain taiga area, known since the early 1900s as Shoria Mountain. The Shorts’ main occupation today is agriculture, including cereal crops, cattle farming and bee farming. They also continue to live according to their traditional livelihoods, however, which includes hunting, fishing and cedar nut harvesting. These indigenous peoples account for only 0.5 percent of Kemerovo Oblast’s population. There are no purely Shorts or Teleut settlements in the Oblast—settlements usually have a mixed population. There are, however, several dozen settlements with a dominant Shorts or Teleut population; in most cases, these are very small villages. The Shorts, an ancient nation from South Siberia, were among
- Page 4 and 5: ii Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 6 and 7: iv Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 8 and 9: vi Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 10 and 11: viii Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indige
- Page 12 and 13: x Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenou
- Page 14 and 15: xii Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 16 and 17: xiv Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 18 and 19: xvi Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 20 and 21: xviii Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indig
- Page 22 and 23: xx Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 24 and 25: xxii Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indige
- Page 26 and 27: xxiv Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indige
- Page 28 and 29: xxvi Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indige
- Page 30 and 31: 2 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenou
- Page 32 and 33: 4 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenou
- Page 34 and 35: 6 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenou
- Page 36 and 37: 8 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenou
- Page 38 and 39: 10 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 40 and 41: 12 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 42 and 43: 14 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 44 and 45: 16 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 46 and 47: 18 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 48 and 49: 20 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 50 and 51: 22 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 52 and 53: 24 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 56 and 57: 28 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 58 and 59: 30 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 60 and 61: 32 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 62 and 63: 34 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 64 and 65: 36 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 66 and 67: 38 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 68 and 69: 40 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 70 and 71: 42 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 72 and 73: 44 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 74 and 75: 46 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 76 and 77: 48 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 78 and 79: 50 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 80 and 81: 52 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 82 and 83: 54 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 84 and 85: 56 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 86 and 87: 58 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 88 and 89: 60 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 90 and 91: 62 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 92 and 93: 64 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 94 and 95: 66 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 96 and 97: 68 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 98 and 99: 70 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 100 and 101: 72 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
- Page 102 and 103: 74 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigeno
26 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />
the surface <strong>and</strong> it would likely run under the Magela Creek, which feeds<br />
the Ramsar listed wetl<strong>and</strong>s of Kakadu.<br />
There was no requirement for environmental assessment for this as it is<br />
described as “exploration activity.” ERA estimates that, if mined, Ranger 3<br />
Deeps would yield 34,000 tons of uranium. The Mirarr have no opportunity<br />
to veto mining at Ranger <strong>and</strong> have made it clear they expect the highest<br />
level of environmental assessment <strong>and</strong> scrutiny to be applied to any new<br />
mining activity on their l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Heap Leaching—Ab<strong>and</strong>oned Before It Started<br />
In 2011 plans for a large “acid heap leach facility” at Ranger were<br />
ab<strong>and</strong>oned. The proposal involved spraying sulfuric acid onto heaps<br />
of low grade ore <strong>and</strong> then collecting the resulting slurry for processing<br />
into uranium oxide. This method of uranium extraction has never been<br />
tested in a wet/dry tropical environment like Kakadu <strong>and</strong> posed severe<br />
contamination threats. The Mirarr were very concerned by this proposal<br />
<strong>and</strong> made their opposition to it clear.<br />
Recommendations<br />
Uranium is a unique mineral with specific properties <strong>and</strong> risks. As such it<br />
requires special attention <strong>and</strong> scrutiny from state parties, regulators <strong>and</strong><br />
producers.<br />
As noted in a 2009 European Commission report, 62 the vast majority<br />
of uranium exploration, mining <strong>and</strong> processing occurs on indigenous<br />
l<strong>and</strong>s. This fact requires heightened attention to ensuring the necessary<br />
preconditions for the realization of free, prior <strong>and</strong> informed consent are<br />
met. There must also be clear <strong>and</strong> independent verification <strong>and</strong> dispute<br />
resolution processes for all stages of any proposed mining operation.<br />
The waste from uranium mining is dangerous <strong>and</strong> long lasting. It contains<br />
around 85 percent of the original radioactivity of the mined rock. The<br />
mining process makes the radioactivity far more available to cause harm<br />
to humans than than in its natural state. Combined with the long-lived<br />
nature of the radioactivity, this means that significantly greater attention<br />
must be given to closure <strong>and</strong> post-closure planning <strong>and</strong> management.