17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

322 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

In the 2009 Manila Conference, Loreen Jubitana of the<br />

Association of <strong>Indigenous</strong> Village Leaders in Suriname presented<br />

a case study of the problems that can come from a situation<br />

with little regulation to support community rights. 21 She<br />

pointed out that, at the time, Suriname was the only country<br />

in the western hemisphere without constitutional recognition<br />

of indigenous peoples rights, despite ratifying international<br />

agreements such as the Convention on the Elimination of All<br />

Forms of Racial Discrimination <strong>and</strong> the UNDRIP. There was<br />

also essentially no existing environmental legal framework.<br />

Meanwhile, the current draft Mining Act failed to provide for<br />

consultations with indigenous peoples <strong>and</strong> ignored the recommendations<br />

made by the UN Committee on the Elimination<br />

of Racial Discrimination to the government.<br />

In this context, BHP Billiton <strong>and</strong> Alcoa signed a joint<br />

venture for exploration in a 2,800 sq km lease area, called the<br />

Bakhuys Project. No environmental, social impact assessment<br />

(ESIA) was conducted for advanced exploration (which ended<br />

in October 2005), <strong>and</strong> there was no consultation or participation<br />

of the communities in relation to the initial memor<strong>and</strong>um<br />

of underst<strong>and</strong>ing created by the company <strong>and</strong> government. In<br />

addition, there was no cumulative assessment of the impacts of<br />

the mining phase, <strong>and</strong> communities were not informed prior<br />

to the commencement of these ESIAs. Initial communication<br />

with chiefs was inadequate, with insufficient advance notice,<br />

a lack of information, <strong>and</strong> inappropriate material. The time<br />

provided was too short for information to be processed by<br />

the communities. Initial requests by chiefs for information<br />

sessions were denied <strong>and</strong> downstream communities were excluded<br />

from processes until mid 2006.<br />

The government informed the communities that they<br />

had to discuss their issues with them rather than the companies,<br />

while the companies told them that they did not have to<br />

adhere to st<strong>and</strong>ards, such as FPIC, which were not recognized<br />

by the government. Ms Jubitana concluded that it was essential<br />

to put the government under more pressure to recognize<br />

indigenous peoples’ l<strong>and</strong> rights, which are the crux of the<br />

issue. While companies had brought the chiefs to mine sites<br />

in Colombia <strong>and</strong> Brazil, they had not shown them the real

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!