Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links
Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links
304 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industries application of this text even more plausible as a necessary means to comply with the demands of the Declaration as well. Throughout this analysis the remedial character of the Convention, in terms of indigenous rights, becomes clear. It is, precisely, the relative demand of these rights, or the denial of them, which defines the field of application of the regulations relative to indigenous peoples, and more specifically, as we have been establishing, these obligations in relation to the Convention. It is the violations of indigenous peoples’ rights, which have summoned us to establish a connection between the proceedings of universal justice and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Due to the fact that Convention 169 constitutes the main regulatory instrument relating directly to indigenous peoples’ rights, and given the recent ratification of this text by the Spanish state, the author infers the necessity of the extraterritorial application of the Convention as a remedial measure to implement when faced with the violation of rights in indigenous territories by Spanish corporations. 3. Lastly, a final argument which supports the thesis of the extraterritorial application of the Convention would be the progressive integration of human rights into the foreign policy of the Spanish state, as much in a general sense as in relation to indigenous peoples’ rights. The efforts made, as well as the deep compromise of the Spanish state in the policies of cooperation with indigenous peoples has been expressed through the Spanish Strategy for Cooperation with Indigenous Peoples (ECEPI). This is a strategy, which although passed in 2006, was elaborated in parallel to the process of the ratification of the Convention. The Sectoral Strategy, as the main instrument of planning in relation to all cooperative action aimed at working with indigenous peoples, fully assumes the principles and rights of the Convention, including the right of self identification of indigenous peoples; the recognition of the special link between the indigenous cultures and indigenous land; the right to “self development” and the right to participate in decisions which affect them, within the framework of a “focus based…on the recognition of rights.” 79 The Strategy goes further than the Convention in recognizing as a general principle, in line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the right to free, prior, informed consent, which “includes the right to reject proposals for projects and activities of development cooperation, or of any other kind, particularly when they affect their land and territory.” 80 The Sectoral Strategy actively promotes the rights recognized in the Convention, including the “full and effective” participation of indigenous peoples in decision making processes; the development of capacity of the
Chapter 2.7: International Processes and Complaints Mechanisms 305 authorities of indigenous organizations and institutions, and the protection of indigenous territories and cultures. 81 Consequently, the Spanish state, in relation to indigenous peoples’ rights, has proceeded assuming a structural compromise reflected in different actions as different times, all pointing to the same objective. In the first place, the Spanish state accepted the commitment and the challenge of ratifying ILO Convention 169. Later, it has worked intensively within the framework of the UN for the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Finally, it has reflected its commitment in its foreign policy, which has been translated into the elaboration of the Spanish Strategy for Cooperation with Indigenous Peoples. Therefore, conscious of the problems which are caused by the presence of Spanish corporations in indigenous territory, and the framework of strategic action which the Spanish state has developed during the last few years, it is necessary to assume the extraterritorial application of international treaties and conventions concerning human rights as a necessary condition in order to be able to implement the aforementioned commitments in terms of human rights and, more specifically, the commitment of the Spanish state to the fulfillment and realization of the rights of indigenous peoples through ILO Convention 169. Endnotes 1 United Nations, 2009, State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, ST/ ESA/328, pp. 1-2, http://www.galdu.org/govat/doc/sowip.pdf. 2 UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues – http://social.un.org/ index/IndigenousPeoples.aspx; IWGIA, 2003, “The Permanent Forum for Indigenous Peoples: The struggle for a new partnership.” http:// www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_publications_files/PermanentForum.pdf. 3 EMRIP, 2012, “Follow-up report on indigenous peoples and the right to participate in decision-making, with a focus on extractive industries.” Report to the twenty first session of the Human Rights Council, 16 August, A/HRC/21/55. 4 UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples - http:// www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/IPeoples/EMRIP/Pages/EMRIPIndex.aspx. 5 S. J. Anaya, 2012, “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples to the twenty first session of the Human Rights Council.” 6 July, A/HRC/21/47, particularly paragraphs 79-81. 6 UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – http:// www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/IPeoples/SRIndigenousPeoples/Pages/
- Page 282 and 283: 254 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 284 and 285: 256 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 286 and 287: 258 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 288 and 289: 260 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 290 and 291: 262 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 292 and 293: 264 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 294 and 295: 266 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 296 and 297: 268 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 298 and 299: 270 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 300 and 301: 272 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 302 and 303: 274 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 304 and 305: 276 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 306 and 307: 278 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 308 and 309: 280 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 310 and 311: 282 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 312 and 313: 284 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 314 and 315: 286 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 316 and 317: 288 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 318 and 319: 290 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 320 and 321: 292 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 322 and 323: 294 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 324 and 325: 296 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 326 and 327: 298 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 328 and 329: 300 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 330 and 331: 302 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 334 and 335: 306 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 336 and 337: 308 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 338 and 339: 310 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 340 and 341: 312 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 342 and 343: 314 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 344 and 345: 316 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 346 and 347: 318 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 348 and 349: 320 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 350 and 351: 322 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 352 and 353: 324 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 354 and 355: 326 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 356 and 357: 328 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 358 and 359: 330 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 360 and 361: 332 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 362 and 363: 334 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 364 and 365: 336 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 366 and 367: 338 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 368 and 369: 340 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 370 and 371: 342 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 372 and 373: 344 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 374 and 375: 346 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 376 and 377: 348 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 378 and 379: 350 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 380 and 381: 352 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
304 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />
application of this text even more plausible as a necessary means to<br />
comply with the dem<strong>and</strong>s of the Declaration as well.<br />
Throughout this analysis the remedial character of the Convention, in<br />
terms of indigenous rights, becomes clear. It is, precisely, the relative<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> of these rights, or the denial of them, which defines the field of<br />
application of the regulations relative to indigenous peoples, <strong>and</strong> more<br />
specifically, as we have been establishing, these obligations in relation<br />
to the Convention. It is the violations of indigenous peoples’ rights, which<br />
have summoned us to establish a connection between the proceedings<br />
of universal justice <strong>and</strong> the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Due<br />
to the fact that Convention 169 constitutes the main regulatory instrument<br />
relating directly to indigenous peoples’ rights, <strong>and</strong> given the recent<br />
ratification of this text by the Spanish state, the author infers the necessity<br />
of the extraterritorial application of the Convention as a remedial measure<br />
to implement when faced with the violation of rights in indigenous<br />
territories by Spanish corporations.<br />
3. Lastly, a final argument which supports the thesis of the extraterritorial<br />
application of the Convention would be the progressive integration of<br />
human rights into the foreign policy of the Spanish state, as much in a<br />
general sense as in relation to indigenous peoples’ rights. The efforts<br />
made, as well as the deep compromise of the Spanish state in the policies<br />
of cooperation with indigenous peoples has been expressed through the<br />
Spanish Strategy for Cooperation with <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> (ECEPI). This<br />
is a strategy, which although passed in 2006, was elaborated in parallel to<br />
the process of the ratification of the Convention.<br />
The Sectoral Strategy, as the main instrument of planning in relation to<br />
all cooperative action aimed at working with indigenous peoples, fully<br />
assumes the principles <strong>and</strong> rights of the Convention, including the right<br />
of self identification of indigenous peoples; the recognition of the special<br />
link between the indigenous cultures <strong>and</strong> indigenous l<strong>and</strong>; the right to “self<br />
development” <strong>and</strong> the right to participate in decisions which affect them,<br />
within the framework of a “focus based…on the recognition of rights.” 79<br />
The Strategy goes further than the Convention in recognizing as a general<br />
principle, in line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong><br />
<strong>Peoples</strong>, the right to free, prior, informed consent, which “includes the right<br />
to reject proposals for projects <strong>and</strong> activities of development cooperation,<br />
or of any other kind, particularly when they affect their l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> territory.” 80<br />
The Sectoral Strategy actively promotes the rights recognized in the<br />
Convention, including the “full <strong>and</strong> effective” participation of indigenous<br />
peoples in decision making processes; the development of capacity of the