Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

17.11.2014 Views

304 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industries application of this text even more plausible as a necessary means to comply with the demands of the Declaration as well. Throughout this analysis the remedial character of the Convention, in terms of indigenous rights, becomes clear. It is, precisely, the relative demand of these rights, or the denial of them, which defines the field of application of the regulations relative to indigenous peoples, and more specifically, as we have been establishing, these obligations in relation to the Convention. It is the violations of indigenous peoples’ rights, which have summoned us to establish a connection between the proceedings of universal justice and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Due to the fact that Convention 169 constitutes the main regulatory instrument relating directly to indigenous peoples’ rights, and given the recent ratification of this text by the Spanish state, the author infers the necessity of the extraterritorial application of the Convention as a remedial measure to implement when faced with the violation of rights in indigenous territories by Spanish corporations. 3. Lastly, a final argument which supports the thesis of the extraterritorial application of the Convention would be the progressive integration of human rights into the foreign policy of the Spanish state, as much in a general sense as in relation to indigenous peoples’ rights. The efforts made, as well as the deep compromise of the Spanish state in the policies of cooperation with indigenous peoples has been expressed through the Spanish Strategy for Cooperation with Indigenous Peoples (ECEPI). This is a strategy, which although passed in 2006, was elaborated in parallel to the process of the ratification of the Convention. The Sectoral Strategy, as the main instrument of planning in relation to all cooperative action aimed at working with indigenous peoples, fully assumes the principles and rights of the Convention, including the right of self identification of indigenous peoples; the recognition of the special link between the indigenous cultures and indigenous land; the right to “self development” and the right to participate in decisions which affect them, within the framework of a “focus based…on the recognition of rights.” 79 The Strategy goes further than the Convention in recognizing as a general principle, in line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the right to free, prior, informed consent, which “includes the right to reject proposals for projects and activities of development cooperation, or of any other kind, particularly when they affect their land and territory.” 80 The Sectoral Strategy actively promotes the rights recognized in the Convention, including the “full and effective” participation of indigenous peoples in decision making processes; the development of capacity of the

Chapter 2.7: International Processes and Complaints Mechanisms 305 authorities of indigenous organizations and institutions, and the protection of indigenous territories and cultures. 81 Consequently, the Spanish state, in relation to indigenous peoples’ rights, has proceeded assuming a structural compromise reflected in different actions as different times, all pointing to the same objective. In the first place, the Spanish state accepted the commitment and the challenge of ratifying ILO Convention 169. Later, it has worked intensively within the framework of the UN for the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Finally, it has reflected its commitment in its foreign policy, which has been translated into the elaboration of the Spanish Strategy for Cooperation with Indigenous Peoples. Therefore, conscious of the problems which are caused by the presence of Spanish corporations in indigenous territory, and the framework of strategic action which the Spanish state has developed during the last few years, it is necessary to assume the extraterritorial application of international treaties and conventions concerning human rights as a necessary condition in order to be able to implement the aforementioned commitments in terms of human rights and, more specifically, the commitment of the Spanish state to the fulfillment and realization of the rights of indigenous peoples through ILO Convention 169. Endnotes 1 United Nations, 2009, State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, ST/ ESA/328, pp. 1-2, http://www.galdu.org/govat/doc/sowip.pdf. 2 UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues – http://social.un.org/ index/IndigenousPeoples.aspx; IWGIA, 2003, “The Permanent Forum for Indigenous Peoples: The struggle for a new partnership.” http:// www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_publications_files/PermanentForum.pdf. 3 EMRIP, 2012, “Follow-up report on indigenous peoples and the right to participate in decision-making, with a focus on extractive industries.” Report to the twenty first session of the Human Rights Council, 16 August, A/HRC/21/55. 4 UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples - http:// www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/IPeoples/EMRIP/Pages/EMRIPIndex.aspx. 5 S. J. Anaya, 2012, “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples to the twenty first session of the Human Rights Council.” 6 July, A/HRC/21/47, particularly paragraphs 79-81. 6 UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – http:// www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/IPeoples/SRIndigenousPeoples/Pages/

304 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

application of this text even more plausible as a necessary means to<br />

comply with the dem<strong>and</strong>s of the Declaration as well.<br />

Throughout this analysis the remedial character of the Convention, in<br />

terms of indigenous rights, becomes clear. It is, precisely, the relative<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> of these rights, or the denial of them, which defines the field of<br />

application of the regulations relative to indigenous peoples, <strong>and</strong> more<br />

specifically, as we have been establishing, these obligations in relation<br />

to the Convention. It is the violations of indigenous peoples’ rights, which<br />

have summoned us to establish a connection between the proceedings<br />

of universal justice <strong>and</strong> the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Due<br />

to the fact that Convention 169 constitutes the main regulatory instrument<br />

relating directly to indigenous peoples’ rights, <strong>and</strong> given the recent<br />

ratification of this text by the Spanish state, the author infers the necessity<br />

of the extraterritorial application of the Convention as a remedial measure<br />

to implement when faced with the violation of rights in indigenous<br />

territories by Spanish corporations.<br />

3. Lastly, a final argument which supports the thesis of the extraterritorial<br />

application of the Convention would be the progressive integration of<br />

human rights into the foreign policy of the Spanish state, as much in a<br />

general sense as in relation to indigenous peoples’ rights. The efforts<br />

made, as well as the deep compromise of the Spanish state in the policies<br />

of cooperation with indigenous peoples has been expressed through the<br />

Spanish Strategy for Cooperation with <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> (ECEPI). This<br />

is a strategy, which although passed in 2006, was elaborated in parallel to<br />

the process of the ratification of the Convention.<br />

The Sectoral Strategy, as the main instrument of planning in relation to<br />

all cooperative action aimed at working with indigenous peoples, fully<br />

assumes the principles <strong>and</strong> rights of the Convention, including the right<br />

of self identification of indigenous peoples; the recognition of the special<br />

link between the indigenous cultures <strong>and</strong> indigenous l<strong>and</strong>; the right to “self<br />

development” <strong>and</strong> the right to participate in decisions which affect them,<br />

within the framework of a “focus based…on the recognition of rights.” 79<br />

The Strategy goes further than the Convention in recognizing as a general<br />

principle, in line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong><br />

<strong>Peoples</strong>, the right to free, prior, informed consent, which “includes the right<br />

to reject proposals for projects <strong>and</strong> activities of development cooperation,<br />

or of any other kind, particularly when they affect their l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> territory.” 80<br />

The Sectoral Strategy actively promotes the rights recognized in the<br />

Convention, including the “full <strong>and</strong> effective” participation of indigenous<br />

peoples in decision making processes; the development of capacity of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!