17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2.7: International Processes <strong>and</strong> Complaints Mechanisms<br />

303<br />

contained in this Convention.” The lack of limitation in terms of the<br />

activities of the Spanish multinationals in indigenous territory constitutes<br />

an exertion of force <strong>and</strong> intolerable violence from a human rights based<br />

perspective.<br />

To this we would have to add two further arguments:<br />

1. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, the obligations which emanate from the Constitution<br />

of the ILO, expressed, in relation to our subject matter, in Article 19 (5)<br />

(d), in which State Parties under an international labor agreement, “would<br />

adopt the measures necessary to make the regulations of said Convention<br />

effective.” From this statement, together with the text of the Convention,<br />

we can deduce that states have legal obligations in relation to it, <strong>and</strong> that<br />

extraterritoriality constitutes an important means to adopt “the necessary<br />

measures” to render the regulations of the Convention effective. To<br />

contextualize the obligations of the Convention within the specific <strong>and</strong><br />

concrete situation of each country is a dem<strong>and</strong> which acts as an indicator,<br />

as an expression of the main problems which each state encounters in<br />

terms of indigenous peoples’ rights. It is significant, in this sense, the<br />

difficulties which Spanish corporations are having in complying with the<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s of the Convention. Consequently, it is the obligation of the state<br />

to assume all the necessary measures to achieve effectiveness in terms<br />

of the Convention, <strong>and</strong> extraterritoriality is a means among many.<br />

2. A second argument is related to the practices <strong>and</strong> positions, which<br />

the Spanish state has adopted in relation to indigenous peoples’ rights<br />

in the international arena. Today, the Convention is no longer the only<br />

international text in force regarding indigenous people’s rights. In parallel<br />

with the ratification of the Convention by the Spanish state, the United<br />

Nations Declaration on the Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> also came into<br />

effect, adopted by the General Assembly, with Spain voting for it, <strong>and</strong><br />

indeed having played an active part in the group of states who sponsored<br />

the Declaration. The Declaration recognizes, in Article 42, the special<br />

role which the entire international community plays in the promotion<br />

<strong>and</strong> protection of indigenous people’s rights in the world, affirming that<br />

“The United Nations, its bodies…<strong>and</strong> specialized agencies…<strong>and</strong> States<br />

shall promote respect for <strong>and</strong> full application of the provisions of this<br />

Declaration <strong>and</strong> follow up the effectiveness of this Declaration.” 78<br />

Therefore, not only are the obligations of the Spanish state in relation to<br />

the Convention ratified, but as a consequence of the Declaration coming<br />

into effect, whose articles go significantly deeper than the Convention in<br />

terms of indigenous rights, they are energetically reinforced. This same<br />

argument, of reinforcement of legal obligations makes the extraterritorial

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!