17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

276 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

has been set up to research the issue <strong>and</strong> implementing the<br />

United Nations “Protect, Respect <strong>and</strong> Remedy” Framework<br />

(the section on voluntary codes explains this further). It plans<br />

to hold a forum once a year, which should allow input from the<br />

victims of abuses perpetrated by multinational corporations. 12<br />

Treaty-Based Human Rights Mechanisms<br />

There are 10 Treaty bodies that monitor implementation<br />

of the core international human rights treaties. These include<br />

relevant mechanisms such as the Committee on Economic,<br />

Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural Rights (CESCR) <strong>and</strong> the Committee on<br />

the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). 13<br />

The CESCR in its recommendations to Ecuador <strong>and</strong> Colombia<br />

asserted that indigenous peoples’ consent is required in the<br />

context of extractive industry projects. 14 In 2009, the case<br />

of Poma-Poma v Peru was brought before the Human Rights<br />

Committee, using the Optional Protocol International<br />

Covenant on Civil <strong>and</strong> Political Rights (ICCPR). The Human<br />

Rights Committee stated that for indigenous participation in<br />

decision making to be effective their FPIC was required <strong>and</strong><br />

that “mere consultation” was inadequate to ensure protection<br />

of their rights under Article 27 ICCPR. 15<br />

With regard to the Treaty bodies, however, the Committee<br />

on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination<br />

(CERD) is a particularly important <strong>and</strong> relevant structure for<br />

indigenous peoples. This is because in its role dealing with<br />

racial discrimination, it has clearly defined its responsibility for<br />

addressing the rights of indigenous peoples. One of the roles<br />

of treaty bodies is clarifying issues around the conventions<br />

(treaties) on which they are based, in what are called General<br />

Comments. The CERD published its General Comment 23 on<br />

<strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>. It has many strong statements in it, including<br />

the CERD’s view that there is a requirement for free,<br />

prior, informed consent (FPIC) where rights will be affected,<br />

which has been hugely beneficial in establishing FPIC as a<br />

global st<strong>and</strong>ard. 16<br />

The CERD meets twice a year in Geneva, <strong>and</strong> there are<br />

three ways it can be useful. It conducts periodic reviews of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!