17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2.6: Legal Strategy from the Local to the International<br />

267<br />

Endnotes<br />

1<br />

Mines <strong>and</strong> Communities, 2007, “Congo court clears former Anvil staff<br />

of war crimes.” 28 June, http://www.mines<strong>and</strong>communities.org//article.<br />

php?a=6703.<br />

2<br />

S. Kirsch, 2009, Presentation to International Conference on<br />

Extractive Industries <strong>and</strong> <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>, 25 March, Manila,<br />

<strong>Philippine</strong>s.<br />

3<br />

Global response Guide for Communities, p. 11.<br />

4<br />

Aurelio Cal <strong>and</strong> the Maya Village of Santa Cruz v Attorney General<br />

of Belize; <strong>and</strong> Manuel Coy <strong>and</strong> Maya Village of Conejo v Attorney<br />

General of Belize, (Consolidated) Claim Nos 171 & 172, 2007,<br />

Supreme Court of Belize (18 October 2007) para 136(d); The Maya<br />

Leaders Alliance <strong>and</strong> the Toledo Alcaldes Association on behalf of<br />

the Maya Villages of Toledo District et al. v The Attorney General of<br />

Belize <strong>and</strong> the Minister of Natural Resources Environment Claim No.<br />

366, 2008 Supreme Court Of Belize (28th June 2010) para 126 (I),<br />

quoted in “The Requirement to Obtain FPIC: Natural Evolution or<br />

Groundbreaking Development?” Reflections on the UN Declaration on<br />

the Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>, Oxford 2011, p. 12.<br />

5<br />

R. Goodl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> C. Wicks. 2008, “<strong>Philippine</strong>s: Mining or Food,<br />

Working Group on Mining i, the <strong>Philippine</strong>s.” pp. 109-122. For examples<br />

of bringing a case challenging legislation see the Tampakan case<br />

later in the chapter.<br />

6<br />

The information in this part of the chapter, unless otherwise noted,<br />

comes from the excellent guide by the International Federation<br />

for Human Rights (FIDH), 2012, “Corporate Accountability <strong>and</strong><br />

Human Rights Abuses - A Guide for Victims <strong>and</strong> NGOs on Recourse<br />

Mechanisms.” pp. 99-152.<br />

7<br />

Velazquez Rodriguez v. Honduras, Inter-American Court of Human<br />

Rights, judgment on its merits, 29 July 1988, Series C No. 4.<br />

8<br />

Full details of using the mechanism can be reviewed at: International<br />

Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), 2012, “Corporate Accountability<br />

<strong>and</strong> Human Rights Abuses - A Guide for Victims <strong>and</strong> NGOs on<br />

Recourse Mechanisms.” pp. 153-173 or go to the Commission website<br />

http://www.cidh.oas.org.<br />

9<br />

C. Clarke, 2012, “Strategies of resistance: testing the limits of the law,<br />

State of the World’s Minorities <strong>and</strong> <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>.” Minority Rights<br />

Group, June, p. 28.<br />

10<br />

The Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua,<br />

Judgment of 31 August 2001, Inter-American Court of Human Rights,<br />

(Ser. C) No. 79.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!