17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2.6: Legal Strategy from the Local to the International<br />

265<br />

holds that indigenous peoples are uncivilized, non-Christian <strong>and</strong> child-like<br />

in nature. It was on this basis that the “discovering” European nations held<br />

themselves superior to indigenous peoples.<br />

Commencing with the 1863 Treaty of Ruby Valley between the Shoshone<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Federal Government, Ms Cavanaugh-Bill traced the legal history<br />

of the Shoshone struggle. Major events in that history included the<br />

establishment of the Indian Claims Commission in 1946 <strong>and</strong> its claim<br />

in 1962 (a year after the discovery of mining process that would enable<br />

open-pit mining in Shoshone l<strong>and</strong>s) that the Western Shoshone title<br />

had been extinguished. She explained that following this, in 1973, a<br />

Trespass Action was taken by the government against the Dann sisters.<br />

Subsequent to this, in 1978, the Indian Claims Commission made<br />

a valuation of Shoshone l<strong>and</strong>s. The Department of the Interior then<br />

accepted the Indian Claims Commission money based on its valuation in<br />

payment for the Shoshone l<strong>and</strong>s in 1979. The Western Shoshone never<br />

accepted payment for their l<strong>and</strong>s. A case was taken to the US Supreme<br />

Court, but in a ruling in 1985 it failed to address the violations of the<br />

Dann’s property rights <strong>and</strong>, based on a narrow technical argument, upheld<br />

the payment transaction between the Indian Claims Commission <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Department of the Interior.<br />

Having exhausted local remedies, the Danns took their case to the Inter-<br />

American Commission on Human Rights, which in 2002 found against<br />

the U.S. It cited violations of the right to property, the right to due process<br />

<strong>and</strong> the right to equality under the law. This ruling was supported by the<br />

Early Warning Urgent Action decision of the Committee on the Elimination<br />

of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in 2006 against the US government.<br />

The CERD reconfirmed its decision in 2008. The decision addressed<br />

protections afforded to sacred sites in the context of mining operations<br />

<strong>and</strong> the rights to culture <strong>and</strong> health. In 2007, the CERD also made a<br />

recommendation to Canada regarding extraterritorial regulation of it<br />

mining companies, such as Barrick Gold <strong>and</strong> others.<br />

Western Shoshone Territory is one of the world’s largest gold producing<br />

areas with many of the major gold companies, including Barrick,<br />

Newmont, <strong>and</strong> Kennecott/Rio Tinto. There are many other Canadian junior<br />

companies who are exploring. Mining in Shoshone l<strong>and</strong>s is governed by<br />

the 1872 Mining Law, which applies to all “federal” l<strong>and</strong>s. It is open-pit<br />

cyanide heap leach mining with each mine pumping out of up to 70,000<br />

gallons of water per minute. In addition to mining projects, Shoshone<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s are also home to nuclear testing <strong>and</strong> nuclear waste disposal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!