17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2.6: Legal Strategy from the Local to the International<br />

259<br />

indigenous. There are some more enlightened states, at least<br />

in terms of rhetoric or legislation. Yet, concerns of national<br />

supremacy, a preference for inter-governmental consensus,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a politicization of the debate on human rights has left it<br />

low on the regional agenda.<br />

The Association of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN) created<br />

an ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human<br />

Rights in 2009, but it has yet to move much beyond human<br />

rights promotion as opposed to protection. The good news<br />

is that an early version of the draft ASEAN Human Rights<br />

Declaration contained a reference to indigenous peoples, their<br />

collective rights <strong>and</strong> the obligation to obtain FPIC in certain<br />

conditions. The bad news, however, is that further drafts are<br />

not being transparently shared with civil society, <strong>and</strong> behind<br />

closed doors; it is quite possible that such provisions have been<br />

removed. 25<br />

Given this situation, communities in Asia are likely to look<br />

immediately beyond their own countries to the complaints<br />

mechanisms in the next chapter (see Chapter 2.7), or to the<br />

possibilities of legal action in the home country of the company.<br />

2.6.3 Extraterritorial Legal Action<br />

It the community is dealing with a multinational corporation,<br />

it can consider legal action in the home country where<br />

the company is registered. This is known as an extraterritorial<br />

legal action. It is particularly useful if the community affected<br />

by a company’s activities have a low chance of obtaining justice<br />

in their own country. It may even have some practical advantages.<br />

Because the parent company often perpetrates the alleged<br />

crime, or at least makes the decisions that lead to the<br />

violation, evidence is often located in the company’s country<br />

of origin. Any court action in the home country should also<br />

raise more publicity to highlight the issues, <strong>and</strong>, if there is<br />

a financial settlement made, it is likely to be more generous.<br />

Just the threat of a lawsuit can seriously scare current <strong>and</strong><br />

potential investors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!