17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

256 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

nomic, social, cultural, <strong>and</strong> environmental rights, with a specific<br />

provision for recognizing collective rights. The African<br />

Charter provided for the creation of the African Commission<br />

on Human <strong>and</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>’ Rights (ACHRP), a mechanism<br />

which in turn led to the establishment of the African Court on<br />

Human <strong>and</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>’ Rights.<br />

As the only regional human rights instrument to specifically<br />

reference peoples’ rights, it may be hoped it would be<br />

leading the way on indigenous cases. This is not the case<br />

though, as African states in general have resisted the idea<br />

of particular ethnic groups having specific inherent rights,<br />

instead arguing that all native Africans are “indigenous,” in<br />

the sense of being pre-colonial. 15 This has been countered<br />

by the ACHRP, which in 2000 set up the Working Group on<br />

<strong>Indigenous</strong> Populations/Communities in Africa, <strong>and</strong> in 2006<br />

published a summary of its work on the issue, clarifying—<strong>and</strong><br />

dispelling some misconceptions around—the definition of<br />

indigenous peoples in Africa. 16<br />

The ACHRP did not take up the chance to address the<br />

issues of indigenous peoples’ rights when it heard the 2002<br />

case of The Social <strong>and</strong> Economic Rights Centre v Nigeria, concerning<br />

the Ogoni <strong>and</strong> Shell. 17 Although it gave a positive<br />

determination in holding the Federal Government of Nigeria<br />

in violation of a number of the Charters’ articles, it failed to<br />

really address the issue of indigenous rights. The fundamental<br />

case from the ACHRP, which did affirm the rights of indigenous<br />

peoples’ to own their customary l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> to FPIC, is<br />

the 2010 decision in Endorois Welfare Council v Kenya. In doing<br />

so, the ACHPR referred to both the UN Declaration on the<br />

Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Inter-American Court’s<br />

Saramaka case in coming to their conclusions. 18<br />

Communities can directly lodge a complaint with the<br />

ACHPR against a State Party for violations of a right guaranteed<br />

by the African Charter, which includes a states’ duty<br />

to protect from harm by non-state actors, such as extractive<br />

industry companies. The African Commission has set up a<br />

Working Group on Economic, Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural Rights,<br />

which is currently working on a set of guidelines aiming at<br />

detailing states’ obligations under the Charter. The draft

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!