17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

216 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

Kanaks wanted to sign an Impact <strong>and</strong> Benefit Agreement (IBA), similar<br />

to those the Canadian company Inco had negotiated with First Nations<br />

in Canada. Scott H<strong>and</strong>, Inco Chief Executive Officer, replied that as Inco<br />

could not recognize Kanak indigenous peoples’ rights, as France did not.<br />

If they did the company would be engaged in politics, rather than mining.<br />

This is despite the 1998 Noumea Accord having a provision calling for<br />

consultations with the Kanak people on mining projects.<br />

Throughout 2005, Inco continued in its refusal to hear the claims of<br />

the Kanak people. As a result opposition increased, both in terms of<br />

the dem<strong>and</strong> for an agreement <strong>and</strong> also highlighting the need for a full<br />

environmental study of the impacts. In April 2006, the work site was<br />

blocked for several weeks by activists from Rheebu Nuu, who also<br />

blockaded Inco’s offices. There were violent clashes, <strong>and</strong> members of<br />

Rheebu Nuu were arrested. The Rheebu Nuu committee also initiated<br />

various court cases, <strong>and</strong> even appealed to the French Senate. In June<br />

2006 Rheebu Nuu won a victory challenging the Southern Province’s<br />

authorization of the project before the Administrative Tribunal of Noumea,<br />

which led to the cancellation of the lease. The company, however, failed to<br />

stop work, relying on a separate construction permit, which led to further<br />

blockades to try to enforce the decision.<br />

In September 2006, the Brazilian company CVRD (which changed its<br />

name to Vale) acquired Inco. In December 2006, CVRD announced<br />

that the start-up of the project would be delayed in order to review the<br />

situation. They started a process that led to a negotiation with the Kanak<br />

people. Vale’s first act was to change the local Goro-Nickel management<br />

team, bringing in people who were more open to accepting a dialogue with<br />

indigenous peoples.<br />

Finally, on 27 October 2008, Vale-Inco New Caledonia signed an<br />

agreement with Rheebu Nuu, representing the concerned Kanak people,<br />

the chieftains of the Southern tip of Gr<strong>and</strong>e Terre, <strong>and</strong> the Customary<br />

Senate, the latter representing the indigenous Kanak people as a whole.<br />

The agreement agreed to transparency <strong>and</strong> monitoring of environmental<br />

impacts, <strong>and</strong> measures to mitigate the cultural impacts. Neither the<br />

Government of New Caledonia or the French state interfered in the<br />

agreement, even though the company recognized the Kanaks as the<br />

owners of the l<strong>and</strong>. The Southern Province, who were a partner in the<br />

negotiations from the beginning, were eventually unwilling to make a deal<br />

with the Kanaks <strong>and</strong> quit the negotiations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!