Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links
Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links
206 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industries • Fragmentation of FPIC process, so that limited impacts (such as exploration) will be subject to consent, but will then give de facto consent to much more significant operations; • “Transferring” a consent to a different company, even where this could significantly alter the project (which effectively allows companies to “buy a consent” that provides immunity from past wrongs); • Bribery of leaders; • Misreporting of meetings or misinterpretation of leaders’ wishes; • Creation or recognition of “false leaders” or tribal organizations; • Intimidation of leaders and/or communities (especially in militarized areas); • Continual repetition of successive FPIC processes until a community is worn down into giving their consent, a process that is referred to as being “dialogued to death.” 5 These abuses happen despite the law categorically defining FPIC as “the consensus of all members of [indigenous communities] to be determined in accordance with their respective customary laws and practices free from any external manipulation, interference, coercion, and obtained after fully disclosing the intent and scope or the activity, in a language and process understandable to the community.” 6 It seems almost superfluous to point out that none of these all too common practices above seem to comply with the spirit of IPRA. The following is a quote from an Indian activist which effectively illustrates the negative feelings a “forced negotiation” can bring to a community (although it is focused on stakeholders, whereas the community should be viewed as more than that, as rights holders): The meaning of ‘stakeholder’ got ruined the day it got coined by Rio Tinto, a major mining multinational corporation, to give itself legitimacy and pose its demands of somebody else’s land as reasonable. The stakeholder engagement process is purported to be an exchange of information and
Chapter 2.4: Negotiations and Engagement with Companies 207 views between all parties concerned by one project. In fact, a ‘stakeholder engagement process’ stands for communities being continually told of companies’ plans and invited to modify them. But it does not mean that these communities are permitted to reject the projects per se. It does not mean that they are empowered to present their own development plans. 7 So, from an indigenous viewpoint the first element, if it is to be a real unforced negotiation of equals, is that it should entail an understanding of both indigenous culture, which is set within the framework of historical injustice. Therefore it must start with a recognition and respect for indigenous peoples’ rights, as codified in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). One of the clear starting points for that recognition is understanding that FPIC is a collective right for indigenous peoples, which is fundamental to indigenous peoples’ exercise of their right of self-determination with respect to developments affecting their lands, territories and natural resources. Article 26 of the UNDRIP clearly states that “Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources [my emphasis] that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.” Article 32 then notes that “Indigenous peoples have the right to determine and develop priorities and strategies for the development or use of their lands or territories and other resources.” 8 The Human Rights Committee has called upon states to act in accordance with article 1, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, emphasizing, in relation to indigenous peoples, that “the right to self-determination requires, inter alia, that all peoples must be able to freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources.” 9 FPIC is an inherent right that belongs to members of indigenous peoples by virtue of their belonging to a people with internationally recognized collective rights. FPIC is not
- Page 184 and 185: 156 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 186 and 187: 158 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 188 and 189: 160 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 190 and 191: 162 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 192 and 193: 164 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 194 and 195: 166 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 196 and 197: 168 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 198 and 199: 170 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 200 and 201: 172 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 202 and 203: 174 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 204 and 205: 176 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 206 and 207: 178 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 208 and 209: 180 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 210 and 211: 182 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 212 and 213: 184 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 214 and 215: 186 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 216 and 217: 188 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 218 and 219: 190 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 220 and 221: 192 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 222 and 223: 194 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 224 and 225: 196 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 226 and 227: 198 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 228 and 229: 200 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 230 and 231: 202 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 232 and 233: 204 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 236 and 237: 208 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 238 and 239: 210 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 240 and 241: 212 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 242 and 243: 214 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 244 and 245: 216 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 246 and 247: 218 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 248 and 249: 220 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 250 and 251: 222 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 252 and 253: 224 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 254 and 255: 226 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 256 and 257: 228 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 258 and 259: 230 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 260 and 261: 232 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 262 and 263: 234 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 264 and 265: 236 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 266 and 267: 238 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 268 and 269: 240 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 270 and 271: 242 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 272 and 273: 244 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 274 and 275: 246 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 276 and 277: 248 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 278 and 279: 250 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 280 and 281: 252 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
- Page 282 and 283: 254 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigen
Chapter 2.4: Negotiations <strong>and</strong> Engagement with Companies<br />
207<br />
views between all parties concerned by one project. In fact,<br />
a ‘stakeholder engagement process’ st<strong>and</strong>s for communities<br />
being continually told of companies’ plans <strong>and</strong> invited to<br />
modify them. But it does not mean that these communities<br />
are permitted to reject the projects per se. It does not mean<br />
that they are empowered to present their own development<br />
plans. 7<br />
So, from an indigenous viewpoint the first element, if it<br />
is to be a real unforced negotiation of equals, is that it should<br />
entail an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of both indigenous culture, which is<br />
set within the framework of historical injustice. Therefore it<br />
must start with a recognition <strong>and</strong> respect for indigenous peoples’<br />
rights, as codified in the UN Declaration on the Rights<br />
of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> (UNDRIP). One of the clear starting<br />
points for that recognition is underst<strong>and</strong>ing that FPIC is a<br />
collective right for indigenous peoples, which is fundamental<br />
to indigenous peoples’ exercise of their right of self-determination<br />
with respect to developments affecting their l<strong>and</strong>s,<br />
territories <strong>and</strong> natural resources.<br />
Article 26 of the UNDRIP clearly states that “<strong>Indigenous</strong><br />
peoples have the right to own, use, develop <strong>and</strong> control the<br />
l<strong>and</strong>s, territories <strong>and</strong> resources [my emphasis] that they possess<br />
by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation<br />
or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.”<br />
Article 32 then notes that “<strong>Indigenous</strong> peoples have<br />
the right to determine <strong>and</strong> develop priorities <strong>and</strong> strategies<br />
for the development or use of their l<strong>and</strong>s or territories <strong>and</strong><br />
other resources.” 8<br />
The Human Rights Committee has called upon states to act<br />
in accordance with article 1, paragraph 2, of the International<br />
Covenant on Civil <strong>and</strong> Political Rights, emphasizing, in relation<br />
to indigenous peoples, that “the right to self-determination<br />
requires, inter alia, that all peoples must be able to freely<br />
dispose of their natural wealth <strong>and</strong> resources.” 9<br />
FPIC is an inherent right that belongs to members of<br />
indigenous peoples by virtue of their belonging to a people<br />
with internationally recognized collective rights. FPIC is not