Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

17.11.2014 Views

188 Pitfalls and Pipelines: Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industries the Inspection Panel or the CAO can be read in Section IV of the International Federation for Human Rights’ “Corporate Accountability and Human Rights Abuses.” The publication also covers other multilateral development banks. 49 So, although it is not guaranteed, there will be public funding associated with any project; if there is such funding, it is likely to provide new partners and new opportunities for complaints and campaigning. Vedanta Resources in Orissa By Roger Moody, Nostromo Research Vedanta Resources floated on the London Stock Exchange in December 2003 on a prospectus to potential shareholders, which was inadequate— to the point of misrepresentation. Concerns were raised at the time, not least about Anil Agarwal, Vedanta’s progenitor, majority shareowner and executive chairman. 50 Since then the company has gone on to become, by May 2011, the world’s 17th largest publicly-listed mining company 51 Meanwhile those early misgivings have been borne out by the company’s appalling record of violations and mismanagement in the succeeding years. Vedanta is indeed an intrinsically “bad actor” (a concept soon to be discussed by the US Securities Exchange Commission as it works on implementing one of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act), 52 In 2007 Norway’s Council on Ethics released the results of a two-year examination of Vedanta’s operations, primarily those in the Indian state of Orissa (see below). It concluded that “[C]ontinuing to invest in the… company would present an unacceptable risk of contributing to grossly unethical activities.” 53 In response to this indictment, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund sold all its Vedanta shares (valued at around US$13 million). An open invitation had already been extended by the Council to Vedanta to refute its findings and, at any future point, demonstrate a radical improvement in its modus operandi, at which time the Council would consider reversing its earlier stance. Vedanta has failed to do so, and the company remains “blacklisted.” 54 Norway is not the only government concerned at allegations of Vedanta’s behavior. In the second half of 2010, Agarwal had inked an agreement

Chapter 2.3: International Advocacy with Companies and Their Investors 189 (worth around $9.6 billion) with Cairn Energy in order to secure a controlling share of the Scottish oil enterprise’s Indian subsidiary. With this deal Vedanta would secure access to India’s largest known oilfield in Rajasthan. Although quickly bankrolled by a number of UK and other commercial banks, the arrangement raised fears within India’s stateowned oil and gas producer ONGC (itself holding a 30% stake of the field) that it would lose effective control over a prized national resource, and the sacrifice of an equitable share in the project’s future royalties. In view of this, prominent ex-civil servant E.A.S. Sarma (a former adviser on energy to India’s government planning commission) wrote to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, questioning the appropriateness of the takeover. Said Mr Sarma: “Vedanta’s track record so far in mining and power sectors has not been satisfactory… To allow that company to get hold of a sizeable share in the equity of the company that controls the extraction of hydrocarbons in Rajasthan and elsewhere may not be desirable.” As a result of this intervention, the Indian Prime Minister’s Office called for a review of Vedanta’s track record. It was an unusual move on the part of the government. More importantly, in late 2007, India’s Supreme Court had heard compelling evidence of contraventions by Vedanta’s aluminium subsidiary (VAL) of state forest and environmental regulations at the company’s costliest project to date. The Niyamgiri bauxite deposit lies at the heart of a thickly-forested Kondh tribal area, the mining of which was to be linked to the nearby Lanjigarh alumina refinery, which serves Vedanta’s Jharsaguda smelter, 335 km away—all three situated in Orissa. In rejecting Vedanta’s application to access Niyamgiri, the judges had paid tribute to the weight of allegations against the company, contained in the Norwegian Council of Ethics report. 55 Orissa: Breaking More Than One Law The Niyamgiri mountain is regarded by local tribal inhabitants as Niyam Raja—roughly translated as “Lord of the Law” or “Lord of Dharma”: ample testimony to the reverence paid by the Dongria Kondh to a deeply sacred place. 56 Home to around 200 of their villages, the source of their water, food and medicinal plants; it is densely forested and an area of rich biodiversity, as well as being the source of two major rivers.57

Chapter 2.3: International Advocacy with Companies <strong>and</strong> Their Investors<br />

189<br />

(worth around $9.6 billion) with Cairn Energy in order to secure a<br />

controlling share of the Scottish oil enterprise’s Indian subsidiary. With<br />

this deal Vedanta would secure access to India’s largest known oilfield<br />

in Rajasthan. Although quickly bankrolled by a number of UK <strong>and</strong> other<br />

commercial banks, the arrangement raised fears within India’s stateowned<br />

oil <strong>and</strong> gas producer ONGC (itself holding a 30% stake of the field)<br />

that it would lose effective control over a prized national resource, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

sacrifice of an equitable share in the project’s future royalties.<br />

In view of this, prominent ex-civil servant E.A.S. Sarma (a former adviser<br />

on energy to India’s government planning commission) wrote to Indian<br />

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, questioning the appropriateness of<br />

the takeover. Said Mr Sarma: “Vedanta’s track record so far in mining<br />

<strong>and</strong> power sectors has not been satisfactory… To allow that company to<br />

get hold of a sizeable share in the equity of the company that controls<br />

the extraction of hydrocarbons in Rajasthan <strong>and</strong> elsewhere may not be<br />

desirable.”<br />

As a result of this intervention, the Indian Prime Minister’s Office called<br />

for a review of Vedanta’s track record. It was an unusual move on the part<br />

of the government. More importantly, in late 2007, India’s Supreme Court<br />

had heard compelling evidence of contraventions by Vedanta’s aluminium<br />

subsidiary (VAL) of state forest <strong>and</strong> environmental regulations at the<br />

company’s costliest project to date.<br />

The Niyamgiri bauxite deposit lies at the heart of a thickly-forested Kondh<br />

tribal area, the mining of which was to be linked to the nearby Lanjigarh<br />

alumina refinery, which serves Vedanta’s Jharsaguda smelter, 335 km<br />

away—all three situated in Orissa. In rejecting Vedanta’s application to<br />

access Niyamgiri, the judges had paid tribute to the weight of allegations<br />

against the company, contained in the Norwegian Council of Ethics<br />

report. 55<br />

Orissa: Breaking More Than One Law<br />

The Niyamgiri mountain is regarded by local tribal inhabitants as Niyam<br />

Raja—roughly translated as “Lord of the Law” or “Lord of Dharma”: ample<br />

testimony to the reverence paid by the Dongria Kondh to a deeply sacred<br />

place. 56 Home to around 200 of their villages, the source of their water,<br />

food <strong>and</strong> medicinal plants; it is densely forested <strong>and</strong> an area of rich<br />

biodiversity, as well as being the source of two major rivers.57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!