17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2.3: International Advocacy with Companies <strong>and</strong> Their Investors<br />

185<br />

Inter-American Development Bank Group. Generally they<br />

use taxpayers’ money to provide financing for the purpose<br />

of development, although their interests can be much<br />

more varied. For instance, the World Bank Group includes<br />

the International Finance Corporation (IFC), which acts<br />

as the private sector arm of the Bank, <strong>and</strong> the Multilateral<br />

Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA). MIGA provides political<br />

risk insurance, effectively guaranteeing foreign direct<br />

investments made in developing countries against so-called<br />

“political risk.” Effectively, this is another form of corporate<br />

welfare. MIGA was instrumental in providing political risk<br />

insurance to allow finance to be raised for the construction of<br />

the much criticized Grasberg mine in West Papua/Indonesia.<br />

Once the project was completed, the mine owners—Freeport<br />

McMoRan <strong>and</strong> Rio Tinto—were able to discard the insurance<br />

as having done its job, most likely to avoid a long overdue<br />

environmental investigation. 32<br />

As noted in Chapter 2.2, the World Bank has, despite its<br />

development m<strong>and</strong>ate, a history of support for the extractive<br />

industries, which it failed to correct even when presented with<br />

evidence of the questionable development benefits in its own<br />

Extractive Industries Review (EIR). Nadia Martinez of USbased<br />

Institute for Policy Studies noted the Bank failed “to distinguish<br />

its goals <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards from the likes of Halliburton,<br />

ExxonMobil, Shell, <strong>and</strong> other profit-driven institutions.” 33 In<br />

fact, the year the Bank rejected the EIR’s findings, in the first<br />

nine months (of 2004), just half a dozen oil, gas <strong>and</strong> mining investments<br />

accounted for no less than 56 percent of all related<br />

financial returns to the IFC. 34 It could barely afford to give up<br />

such a cash cow.<br />

So the Bank keeps trying to justify such investments. Its<br />

latest initiative is called extractives for development (E4D).<br />

This is a “knowledge sharing platform” aimed at transforming<br />

the extractive industries into a force for development.<br />

Speaking in December 2011, Rachel Kyte, the Bank’s Vice<br />

President for Sustainable Development, admitted that the<br />

sector has been blighted by “corruption, rent-seeking, environmental<br />

damage, disregard for the rights of local communities,<br />

[<strong>and</strong>] conflict <strong>and</strong> fragility.” 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!