17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

ereign wealth fund founded in 1990, which the Norwegian<br />

government uses to invest its oil money for the future good<br />

of the country (in order to fight off the “resource curse”).<br />

This fund belongs to the government <strong>and</strong> is managed by<br />

Norway’s Central Bank, Norges Bank. In November 2004, the<br />

Norwegian government developed ethical guidelines, which<br />

the fund management has to abide by concerning its investments.<br />

To apply the guidelines, a Council of Ethics was established<br />

to investigate the human rights <strong>and</strong> environmental<br />

record of companies, <strong>and</strong> report back with recommendations<br />

to the Finance Ministry.<br />

Its ultimate sanction is disinvestment in specific companies<br />

when they are found to have committed flagrant abuses.<br />

The Fund has disinvested from the following mining companies:<br />

Barrick Gold, DRD Gold, Freeport MacMoRan, Norilsk<br />

Nickel, Rio Tinto, <strong>and</strong> Vedanta Resources. Few campaigners<br />

would dispute that such exclusion has been of great value<br />

in strengthening the campaign positions of numerous community<br />

members struggling against multinationals. It is also<br />

noteworthy that Norges Bank (which maintains the Pension<br />

Fund) states that it votes on no less than 85,000 resolutions at<br />

around 10,000 AGMs every year. 14<br />

On the subject of what investors can do for the community<br />

it is worth considering the options before approaching them.<br />

Most investors, even ethical investors, will wish to talk to the<br />

company directly to raise community concerns, <strong>and</strong> to underst<strong>and</strong><br />

the responses. While wishing to assist a community, they<br />

will want to underst<strong>and</strong> the situation to assess the risk. Some<br />

will see their role as improving the policies of a company, which<br />

may not have immediate impact on the project in question. It<br />

can also become a long process, which may be useful, but also<br />

may not see the immediate results a community is looking for.<br />

It is undeniable, however, that this sort of contact, even<br />

from minority ethical investors, is likely to put serious pressure<br />

on company management. If a community just wants a<br />

company to stop <strong>and</strong> go away, then these sorts of meetings<br />

may draw concessions, but will not be ideal. What the community<br />

is likely to want, if its dem<strong>and</strong>s are not met, is the sort of<br />

disinvestment that the Norwegian Pension Fund engages in.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!