17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2.2: Challenges at the National Policy Level<br />

151<br />

Despite this, the practical erosion of native title rights <strong>and</strong> interests<br />

continue to happen. Successive governments develop policies<br />

theoretically advocating that indigenous peoples should have the<br />

capacity to determine their own futures <strong>and</strong> consistently argue the need<br />

for improved service delivery programs for the health <strong>and</strong> well-being of<br />

Aboriginal people. In practice, this seldom happens.<br />

Yet, the failure of native title legislation <strong>and</strong> the struggle for selfdetermination<br />

are not mutually exclusive <strong>and</strong> the Australian government<br />

is slowly coming to recognize that a positive outcome for l<strong>and</strong> access<br />

is fundamental to the capacity of indigenous peoples for decision<br />

making. This is where the native title legislation has facilitated some<br />

positive opportunities. In particular it has facilitated an evolving process<br />

of engagement between Aboriginal people <strong>and</strong> the wider community.<br />

This is a process that has broadened from a dialogue on l<strong>and</strong> access to<br />

include other issues such as health, education, employment, community<br />

development, <strong>and</strong> social capital. It has also allowed a seat at the table<br />

with major mining companies for economic opportunities under the “right<br />

to negotiate” or “future act” provisions of the Act. Under this provision,<br />

native title claimants <strong>and</strong> native title holders have the right to negotiate<br />

over proposed activities or developments, such as major mining<br />

developments, that may affect native title.<br />

The right to negotiate does not provide a right for Aboriginal people to veto<br />

or stop projects, which in itself is problematic. This is dealt with later under<br />

the section on free, prior <strong>and</strong> informed consent, but we are increasingly<br />

seeing organizations, from local community groups to major corporations,<br />

negotiating local <strong>and</strong> regional level agreements with Aboriginal people not<br />

only as a successful alternative to the litigation trail through the Federal<br />

Court, but to reach agreement on benefits, such as major employment<br />

<strong>and</strong> business development opportunities for local Aborigines.<br />

In this respect, the Act has facilitated the right of indigenous peoples to<br />

self-determination as set out under Article 3 of the UN Declaration on the<br />

Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>, in effect that indigenous peoples can freely<br />

pursue their economic, social <strong>and</strong> cultural development. Unfortunately,<br />

however, this is now under threat with the development of new policies<br />

by the Federal Government. In particular, the government is seeking<br />

ways of controlling the flow of monetary benefits to traditional owners,<br />

arguing that payments to individuals have been misspent <strong>and</strong> the benefits<br />

of the resources being removed from l<strong>and</strong> are being denied to future<br />

generations. While in some cases this may be true, traditional owners<br />

groups had been tackling the issue head on <strong>and</strong> were making some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!