17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

create restrictions of certain types of l<strong>and</strong> use—including<br />

forestry, agricultural production, tourism or l<strong>and</strong>s designated<br />

as the ancestral l<strong>and</strong>s of indigenous peoples. The extractive<br />

industries could be effectively banned from these designated<br />

areas. This is an interesting idea, but of course there is a<br />

potential clash here in saying that mining would, through<br />

national policy be banned from indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s. It is effectively<br />

undermining the right of those indigenous peoples to<br />

self-determination, even if it is removing development choices<br />

that they would eventually not prefer anyway! 25<br />

Finally, it is clear that any advocacy towards states to get<br />

them to legislate for “responsible mining”—including establishing<br />

specific policy frameworks that address the sustainability<br />

of the mining sector—should refer to indigenous rights,<br />

particularly the key provisions of the UN Declaration on the<br />

Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>.<br />

2.2.3 Dealing with State Repression of<br />

Protest<br />

As we have seen in Chapter 1.1, legitimate protests against<br />

extractive industry projects can far too often lead to the response<br />

of rights violations <strong>and</strong> repression. Although some of<br />

this may come from armed company security, more often than<br />

not it will be the state, which is behind this (or even in the<br />

case of company security, it will the state creating the enabling<br />

environment for such abuses to happen).<br />

In his 2009 Manila Conference presentation on Barrick’s<br />

Porgera Joint Venture mining project in Papua New Guinea,<br />

Jeffery Simon 26 explained that in response to the violence<br />

(outlined in Chapter 1.1), the state was protecting the mining<br />

company <strong>and</strong> ignoring the wishes of the affected people. The<br />

state was supplying police to enforce security at the mine site,<br />

particularly special mobile police squads at the time of evictions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> declaring a state of emergency to suppress protest.<br />

Specifically in March 2009, the Government of Papua New

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!