17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

pany should also conduct its own baseline studies, but it is best<br />

if the community has its own—where possible verified—data<br />

to challenge the company both in its Environmental Impact<br />

Assessment (EIA), but also if there are later incidents of pollution<br />

or habitat destruction.<br />

Community Actions<br />

Once educated <strong>and</strong> empowered, there is an array of possible<br />

strategies with regard to a proposed extractive project.<br />

Both negotiations <strong>and</strong> legal actions are covered later (see<br />

Chapters 2.4 <strong>and</strong> 2.7), as are some actions around networking<br />

in the next part of this chapter (please see Section 2.1.2).<br />

So assuming the community plans to resist the mine, the<br />

first strategy to explore is the idea of a local referendum or<br />

vote on natural resource development. There may be a legal<br />

provision for this already, but even if this is not accepted by<br />

the national government as legally binding, it can carry moral<br />

weight <strong>and</strong> be a good indication of the strength of feeling on<br />

a project. It is also an empowering activity, <strong>and</strong> can stimulate<br />

education campaigns <strong>and</strong> debate on the issue, apart from<br />

being a popular way to democratize the decision making process<br />

around natural resources.<br />

The idea of referenda became popular in 2002, after over<br />

90 percent of a non-indigenous community in Tambogr<strong>and</strong>e<br />

in Peru voted to reject a mining proposal. Since then, the<br />

practice of local voting on mining projects has spread to other<br />

parts of Peru, <strong>and</strong> other Latin American countries including<br />

Guatemala, Costa Rica, Argentina, Mexico, <strong>and</strong> Chile. In virtually<br />

every case, voters overwhelmingly rejected extractive<br />

projects. Referenda are particularly useful where a country<br />

has ratified ILO Convention 169, but has not put in place<br />

the procedural rules to decide on broad community consent<br />

(which may explain its relative popularity in Latin America,<br />

the continent with the most countries who have ratified ILO<br />

Convention 169). 11<br />

They have also proved effective in projects with funding<br />

from the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!