17.11.2014 Views

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

Pitfalls and Pipelines - Philippine Indigenous Peoples Links

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

80 <strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pipelines</strong>: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Extractive Industries<br />

The industry-financed lobbyists in the USA have had<br />

considerable negative influence on United States government<br />

policy, resulting in years of resistance to the development<br />

of a truly international response to the threats from climate<br />

change.<br />

The coal, cement <strong>and</strong> steel industries lobbied directly to<br />

weaken international efforts to impose strict limits on carbon<br />

emissions at the Copenhagen Summit in 2009. They succeeded<br />

in persuading governments to opt for actions aimed<br />

at limiting average temperature rises to two degrees Celsius<br />

by 2100. This target is viewed by some critics as inadequate<br />

in scope or strictness of implementation to avoid some of the<br />

worst impacts of climate change. 41<br />

In attempting to present a clean image of coal, its proponents<br />

in both industry <strong>and</strong> government have made strong<br />

claims for an as yet unproven experimental technical fix to<br />

be the main provider in reducing the mineral’s “carbon<br />

footprint.” This fix is “Carbon Capture <strong>and</strong> Storage (CCS),”<br />

which it is claimed will catch <strong>and</strong> safely store the carbon in<br />

underground geologic formations to reduce carbon dioxide<br />

emissions. 42<br />

According to many scientists, CCS has not been once<br />

proven to work on an industrial scale. According to some it<br />

may never be able to do so. Michael Economides, Professor of<br />

Chemical <strong>and</strong> Biomolecular Engineering at the University of<br />

Houston, Texas, states that “[G]eologic sequestration of CO2<br />

[is] a profoundly non-feasible option for the management of<br />

CO2 emissions.” He suggests that there are insufficient geological<br />

formations suitable to store the enormous quantities<br />

of carbon dioxide, which would be emitted under current<br />

energy-use projections. 43 Storage formations may not be located<br />

where most needed. Neither is there any guarantee that<br />

formations would not rupture, causing stored carbon dioxide<br />

to bubble back up to the surface <strong>and</strong> into the atmosphere. 44<br />

Yet governments have paved the way for a whole new<br />

round of coal-fired power stations based on the promise that,<br />

someday, CCS will work. European Union member states will,<br />

between now <strong>and</strong> 2015, allocate about one billion Euros to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!